DTP-201939-R001 Reva PDF

REMAINING LIFE ASSESSMENT
Equipment : Storage Tank 5000 KL

Item No. / Tag No. : T-01 / 1081-T-010
Owner : PT. PEC Tech Service Indonesia
PT DINAMIKA TEKNIK PERSADA

Golden Boulevard Blok K 1-2
Jl. Pahlawan Seribu, BSD City
Tangerang 15322 – Indonesia
Phone +62-21-50510600
Fax. +62-21-53150601
Email info@dtp-eng.com
www.dtp-eng.com
REMAINING LIFE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Equipment : Storage Tank 5000 KL

Item No. / Tag No. : T-01 / 1081-T-010
A 05 Sept 2019 Draft Report EY IS

By Apprv Apprv
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION
DTP BKI
Document No. : DTP/201939/R001

Storage Tank 5000 KL
Tag No. 1081-T-010 / SN. T-01 Page 3 of 34
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Hasil perhitungan dan penilaian yang mengacu Calculation and assessment result which based on
pada API 653 antara lain : API 653 as following :
1. Tangki Timbun Atmospheric T-01 (5000 KL) 1. Atmospheric storage tank T-01 (5000 KL) in
berada pada kondisi baik dan aman untuk good condition and fitness for service until
beroperasi sampai tahun 2023. 2023.
2. Nilai minimum sisa umur layan adalah 13 2. Minimum value of remaining life is 13 years
tahun.
3. Nilai corrosion rate maksimum adalah 0.274 3. Maximum value of corrosion rate is 0.274
mm/year. mm/year.
4. Nilai maksimum kategori resiko adalah 4. Maksimum risk category is Medium.
Medium.
5. Kondisi kemiringan dan penurunan pada tangki 5. The plumbness and settlement of the tank are
tidak melebihi toleransi berdasarkan API 653. acceptable based on API 653.
General Data
Equipment T-01 (5000 KL)
Tag no. / Serial no. T-01/1081-T-010
Material SA285 Grade C
Design Pressure ATM
Design Temperature 40 oC
Remaining Life Assessment API 653 Risk Asessement
Actual Required Corrosion
Remaining
Component Thickness Thickness Rate Plumbness Settlement 2019 2023
Life (years)
(mm) (mm) (mm/year)
Roof 6.88 4.65 0.160 13 Acceptable Acceptable Medium (2C) Medium (3C)
Shell 1 18.25 4.61 0.158 86 Acceptable Acceptable Medium (2C) Medium (3C)
Bottom 10.19 2.54 0.158 48 Acceptable Acceptable Medium (2C) Medium (3C)
Annular 19.27 4.32 0.158 94 Acceptable Acceptable Medium (2C) Medium (3C)
Inspection and Method
Damage Mechanisms Inspection methods Coverage Area Interval
Visual inspection of >95% of the exposed
Atmospheric Corrosion Visual Inspection Roof, Shell,
surface area with follow-up by UT, RT or
Annular
pit gauge as required
Uniform Corrosion Visual inspection with pit depth gage
Pitting Corrosion UT Thickness / measurements at suspect locations and Roof, Shell,
Scanning UT follow up on suspect location and as Annular Next 4 years
Erosion/corrosion general confirmation of wall thickness
Hydrogen embrittlement Examine >35% for selected welds / weld
UT Flaw Scanning or
Corrosion Fatigue area (Nozzles-to-shell, shell-to-shell, T- Weld Joint
MPI
Brittle Fracture joints)
Under Deposit Broom swept, Effective supplementary
corrosion/MIC UT Thickness/ Flaw light, Visual 100% (API 653), Pit depth
Bottom Max at 2029
Scanning gauge with UT Follow Up or Floor scan
Soil Corrosion >50%
Finding Recommendation
Cathodic protection not installed Cathodic protection should be installed as per API 651
Grounding system not installed Grounding System should be installed as per API 2003
Name plate not installed Name plate should be installed as per API 653 Sec. 13
PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

Engineering Consultancy Services
Ruko Golden Boulevard Blok K No. 1, BSD City, Tangerang 15322, Indonesia
Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Website: www.dtp-eng.com Email: info@dtp-eng.com
SUMMARY OF CHANGE SHEET
Rev No Date Page Description Approve
A 05 Sept 2019 All Draft Report

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 7
2. SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................................................................... 8
3. GENERAL DATA ......................................................................................................................... 9
4. INSPECTION ............................................................................................................................. 10
4.1 External Inspection ............................................................................................................. 10
4.2 Non Destructive Examination .............................................................................................. 11
4.2.1 UT Thickness Measurement....................................................................................... 11
4.2.2 Plumbness and Roundness Measurement ................................................................. 12
4.2.3 Settlement Measurement ........................................................................................... 12
4.2.4 Hardness Test ............................................................................................................ 13
4.2.5 Magnetic Particle Inspection....................................................................................... 13
5. METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 14
5.1 Acceptence Criteria ............................................................................................................. 14
5.2 Damage Mechanism ........................................................................................................... 15
5.3 Engineering Calculation ...................................................................................................... 16
5.3.1 Thickness minimum for Tank Shell ............................................................................. 16
5.3.2 Thickness minimum for Tank Bottom ......................................................................... 17
5.3.3 Corrosion Rate ........................................................................................................... 17
5.4 Remaining Life Assessment ................................................................................................ 19
5.5 Risk Assessment ................................................................................................................ 19
5.5.1 Probability of Failure (PoF) ......................................................................................... 19
5.5.1.1 Total Damage Factor........................................................................................ 19
5.5.1.2 Generic Failure Frequency (GFF)..................................................................... 20
5.5.1.3 Management System Factor (FMS) .................................................................. 20
5.5.2 Consequence of Failure (COF) .................................................................................. 20
5.5.3 Risk Determination ..................................................................................................... 20
5.6 Inspection Plan ................................................................................................................... 21
6. RESULT ..................................................................................................................................... 22
6.1 Damage Mechanism ........................................................................................................... 22
6.2 Thickness Calculation ......................................................................................................... 22
6.3 Remaining Life .................................................................................................................... 23
6.4 Plumbness and Roundness ................................................................................................ 23
6.5 Settlement........................................................................................................................... 24
6.6 MPI Test ............................................................................................................................. 24
6.7 Risk Assessment ................................................................................................................ 25
6.8 Inspection Plan and Method ................................................................................................ 25
7. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 28
APPENDIX A - ENGINEERING CALCULATION ............................................................................... 30
APPENDIX B - NDE REPORT .......................................................................................................... 31
APPENDIX C - PLUMBNESS AND SETTLEMENT REPORT ........................................................... 32
APPENDIX D – RISK ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 33
APPENDIX E - REMAINING LIFE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................ 34

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
LIST OF TABLES
Table 5.1 ASME PCC 3 – Damage Mechanisms Screening Table .................................................... 16
Table 5.2 Damage Factor Types and Descriptions ............................................................................ 20
Table 5.3 Range Category of PoF and CoF ...................................................................................... 21
Table 5.4 ASME PCC 3 Appendix C- Inspection and Monitoring Method .......................................... 21
Table 6.1 Damage Mechanism Screening Result .............................................................................. 22
Table 6.2 Result of Thickness Calculations ....................................................................................... 22
Table 6.3 Result of Corrosion Rate and Remaining Life Calculation.................................................. 23
Table 6.4 Plumbness Result ............................................................................................................. 23
Table 6.5 Settlement Result .............................................................................................................. 24
Table 6.6 MPI Result ......................................................................................................................... 24
Table 6.7 Result of Risk Assessment ................................................................................................ 25
Table 6.8 Inspection Method and Coverage ...................................................................................... 26
Table 6.9 Interval Inspection from Outside Tank ............................................................................... 26
Table 6.10 Interval Inspection from Inside Tank ................................................................................ 27
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.1 Plumbness Tollerance ...................................................................................................... 12

Figure 4.2 Tank Settlement Measurement Point................................................................................ 12
Figure 5.1 Flowchart of Atmospheric Storage Tank ........................................................................... 14
Figure 5.3 Matrix for Risk Category ................................................................................................... 20
Figure 7.1 Result of Risk Category .................................................................................................... 25

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
1. INTRODUCTION
Laporan ini berisikan penilaian teknis untuk This report outlines the engineering calculations
integritas mekanikal tangki timbun sesuai dengan for mechanical integrity of storage tank according
peraturan dan kode/standar yang berlaku : to applicable code/standards :
▪ Peraturan Menteri ESDM nomor 18 tahun ▪ Peraturan Menteri ESDM nomor 18 tahun
2018 tentang “ Pemeriksaan Keselamatan 2018 tentang “ Pemeriksaan Keselamatan
Instalasi dan Pealatan Pada Kegiatan Usaha Instalasi dan Pealatan Pada Kegiatan Usaha
Minyak dan Gas Bumi” Minyak dan Gas Bumi”.
▪ API RP 571, Damage Mechanisms Affecting ▪ API Standard 650, Welded Tanks for Oil
Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry Storage
▪ API RP 575, Guideline and Methods for ▪ API RP 571, Damage Mechanisms Affecting
Inspection of Existing Atmospheric and Low Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry
Pressure Storage Tanks ▪ API RP 575, Guideline and Methods for
▪ API 579, Fitness for Service. Inspection of Existing Atmospheric and Low
▪ API Standard 650, Welded Tanks for Oil Pressure Storage Tanks
Storage ▪ API 579, Fitness for Service.
▪ API RP 651, Cathodic Protection of ▪ API RP 651, Cathodic Protection of
Aboveground Storage Tanks Aboveground Storage Tanks
▪ API RP 652, Linings of Abovegrond Petroleum ▪ API RP 652, Linings of Abovegrond Petroleum
Storage Tank Bottoms Storage Tank Bottom.
▪ API Standard 653, Tank Inspecion, Repair, ▪ API Standard 653, Tank Inspecion, Repair,
Alteration and Reconstruction. Alteration and Reconstruction.
▪ API Standard 2000, Venting Atmospheric and ▪ API Standard 2000, Venting Atmospheric and
Low-pressure Storage Tanks: Nonrefrigerated Low-pressure Storage Tanks: Nonrefrigerated
and Refrigerated. and Refrigerated.
▪ API Recommended Practice 2003. Protection ▪ API Recommended Practice 2003. Protection
Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static, Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static,
Lightning, and Stray Current Lightning, and Stray Current
▪ ASME PCC-3, Inspection Planning Using ▪ ASME PCC-3, Inspection Planning Using
Risk-Based Methods Risk-Based Methods
Dengan mengetahui dan mengevaluasi integritas By knowing the conditions and evaluate the
mekanik dapat mencegah terjadinya insiden mechanical integrity can prevent process safety
seperti kebocoran yang dapat menyebabkan incident, such as loss of containment, that could
kebakaran, paparan racun atau bahaya lead to fire, toxic exposure, or other
lingkungan lainya. environmental hazard.

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
2. SCOPE OF WORK
Review Dokumen Teknis dan Laporan NDE Review of Technical Document and NDE Report
Menelaah dokumen teknis dari tangki yang akan Review the technical documents from the tank
dijadikan dasar dalam perhitungan teknis aktual which will be used as the basis for actual
dan penentuan jenis mekanisme kerusakan technical calculations and determining the type of
berdasarkan deskripsi proses. Selain itu, damage mechanis from process description. In
penelaahan hasil laporan NDE (Non Destructive addition, examine the results of NDE (Non
Examination) juga digunakan untuk Destructive Examination) reports that will be used
mengevaluasi tingkat kerusakan pada tangki. to evaluate the level of damage to the tank.
Laju Korosi & Sisa Umur Corrosion Rate & Remaining Life
Analisa secara statistik biasa digunakan untuk Statistical analysis is usually used to calculate the
perhitungan laju korosi dan sisa umur untuk tiap- corrosion rate and remaining life for each part of
tiap bagian tangki. Pendekatan ini bisa the tank. This approach can be used to determine
digunakan untuk menentukan interval the interval for carrying out internal inspections
pelaksanaan inspeksi internal.
Damage Mech. & Rencana Inspeksi Damage Mech. & Inspection Plan
Penentuan interval dan metode inspeksi Determination of intervals and inspection
sebaiknya mempertimbangkan tipe mekanisme methods shall consider the type of mechanism
kerusakan yang mungkin terjadi akibat proses damage that might occur due to fluid processes
fluida dan kondisi aktual pada tangki. and the actual conditions of the tank
Engineering and Riks Assessment Engineering and Risk Assessment

Berikut adalah beberapa factor yang perlu The following list of factors where considerated in
diperhatikan saat melakukan penilaian teknis dan the engineering and risk assessment:
resiko:
a) Korosi internal karena produk yang disimpan a) Internal corrosion due to the product stored or
atau air yang mengendap water bottoms
b) Korosi luar yang disebabkan paparan b) External corrosion due to environmental
lingkungan exposure
c) Tingkat tegangan dan tingkat tegangan yang c) Stress levels and allowable stress levels
diijinkan
d) Sifat dari produk yang disimpan seperti berat d) Properties of the stored product such as
jenis, suhu dan korosivitas specific gravity, temperature, and corrosivity
e) Design temperatur logam pada tangki yang e) Metal design temperatures at the service
bekerja location of the tank
f) Pondasi tangki dan kondisi settlement f) Tank foundation and settlement conditions.
g) Distorsi pada tangki yang telah beroperasi. g) Distorsion at existing tank.
h) Kondisi operasi seperti pengisian dan h) Operating condition such as filling & emptying
frequensi pengosongan. frequency

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
3. GENERAL DATA
Data tangki secara umum dapat dideskripsikan General data of tank can be described as follow:
sebagai berikut:
Tabel 3.1 General Data of Storage Tank
Owner PT. PEC Tech Service Indonesia

Location Futong, Pelalawan
Operation Storage Tank
Tag no. 1081-T-010
Code API 650
Diameter (mm) 29095
Tank height (mm) 8000
Max Filling Height (mm) 7800
Year built 2012
Joint efficiency 1
Number shell course 4
RT Full
Capacity (KL) 5000
Service Diesel Fuel
Specific gravity 0.88
Design Presssure (psig) ATM
Design temperature (°C) 40
Loading Static
Insulation No
CO2 (% wt) No Data
H2S (% wt) No Data
H2O (%) No Data
Asumsi Data Data Assumtions

1. Jika parameter operasi tidak diketahui maka 1. If unknown operating parameter then it was
diasumsikan dekat dengan parameter desain. assumed to be close to design parameter
2. Jika spesifikasi material tidak diketahui maka 2. If unknown material specification then the
nilai S (maximum allowable stress), Y value of S (maximum allowable stress), Y
(minimum yield strength), T (minimum tensile (minimum yield strength), T (minimum tensile
stenght) dan E (Joint Efficiency) diasumsikan stenght) and E (Joint Efficiency) was assumed
sesuai API 63 Sec. 4.3.3.1 as per API 63 Sec. 4.3.3.1
3. Jika data inspeksi terakhir tidak diketahui 3. If unknown last inspection data (including date
(termasuk tanggal dan ketebalan) maka and thickness) then it was assumed to use
diasumsikan menggunakan data manufaktur manufacturing data or baseline thickness or
atau ketebalan dasar atau tebal nominal. nominal thickness
4. Jika tidak ada data dan informasi untuk 4. If there is no data and information to calculate
menghitung laju korosi maka diasumsikan corrosion rate, it was assumed based on API
berdasarkan API 581. API 581.
5. Penilaian resiko dilakukan berdasarkan API 5. Risk assessment is carried out based on API
581 dengan perhitungan konsequensi 581 with area-based consequence calculation
berbasis Area pada bagian Shell. at shell course.

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
4. INSPECTION
4.1 External Inspection
Inspeksi visual formal, yang dilakukan atau A formal visual inspection, conducted or
diawasi oleh inspektur yang berwenang, untuk supervised by an authorized inspector, to assess
menilai semua aspek pada tangki timbun tanpa all aspects of the tank as possible without
menangguhkan operasi atau membutuhkan suspending operations or requiring tank
penutupan pada tangki timbun shutdown
Ladders, stairways, platforms and walkways Ladders, stairways, platforms and walkways
Pemeriksaan secara visual dilakukan untuk A careful visual inspection should be made to
mendeteksi bagian yang terkorosi atau rusak, detected corroded or broken parts, cracks, the
retak, kekencangan baut, kondisi cat atau tightness of bolts, the condition of paint or
material yang di galvanis, keamanan pegangan galvanizing material, the wear of ladder rungs
tangan dan kondisi dari tempat pijakan pada and stair treads, the security of handrails, and the
platform dan akses jalan. condition of flooring on platforms and walkways.
Fondation and supports Fondation and supports

Hal yang harus diperhatikan pada bagian ini They should be inspected for deterioration such
adalah terjadinya pecahan, retak dan kemiringan as spalling, cracking, and settling by :
dengan cara :
• Memeriksa beton yang rusak • Inspect for broken concrete.
• Memeriksa rongga dibawah pondasi dan • Inspect for cavities under foundation and
tumbuhan yang tumbuh di dasar Tangki. vegetation against bottom of tank
• Memastikan bahwa aliran air hujan dari • Check that runoff rainwater from the shell
dinding dialirkan menjauhi Tangki drains away from tank
Dinding Shell
Pemeriksaan visual terhadap kerusakan cat, Visually inspect for paint failures, pitting, and
pitting, dan korosi. Membersihkan area corrosion. Clean off the bottom angle area and
sambungan antara dinding dan bottom dan inspect for corrosion and thinning on plate and
memeriksa korosi dan penipisan pada pelat dan weld.
lasan.
Atap Roof
Pemeriksaan visual untuk kerusakan cat, lubang, Visually inspect for paint failure, holes, pitting,
pitting, dan kerak (hasil korosi) pada atap and corrosion product on the roof.
Nosel Nozzles
Pemeriksaan visual antara lain : Visual examinations include :
• Memeriksa kebocoran pada sambungan las • Inspect for leakage on weld joint at nozzles,
pada nosel, pintu akses orang, plat penguat. manways, and reinforcing plates.
• Memeriksa kebocoran disekitar flange dan • Inspect for flange leaks and leaks around
baut. bolting

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
• Memeriksa kondisi insulasi disekitar pintu • Inspect condition of insulation around

akses untuk orang dan nosel-nosel manways and nozzles
Peralatan Keselamatan Safety Equipment

Memeriksa kelengkapan peralatan keselamatan Check for completeness of safety equipment
seperti Breather valve (vent), Flame arrester, such as Breather valve (vent), Flame arrestors,
lightening protection, fire water sprinkler, foam lightening protection, fire sprinkler water, foam
chamber, cathodic protection, grounding, chamber, cathodic protection, grounding,
temperature indicator, pressure gauge. temperature indicator, pressure gauge.
Grounding Connection Grounding Connection

Komponen sistem pembumian tangki seperti Tank grounding system components such as
shunt atau sambungan mekanis kabel harus shunts or mechanical connections of cables shall
diperiksa secara visual sesuai dengan API 2003. be visually checked as per API 2003.
Resistensi yang disarankan adalah 5 ohm atau Recommended resistance is 5 ohms or less, and
kurang, dan resistansi tidak melebihi 25 ohm. resistance is not to exceed 25 ohms.
Protective Coating or insulation Protective Coating or insulation

Kondisi dari coating atau insulasi bejana tekan The condition of the protective coating or
harus dipastikan. Berkarat dan melepuh adalah insulation on a vessel shell should be
beberapa kegagalan pada paint yang sering determined. Rust spots and blisters are the types
ditemukan. of paint failures usually found.
Auxiliary Equipment Auxiliary Equipment

Peralatan pendukung, seperti sambungan alat Auxiliary equipment, such as gauge connections
pengukur (tekanan dan suhu), kaca untuk melihat (pressure and temperature gauge), sight glasses,
tingkat fluida di dalam (level glass) dan katup and safety valves, may be visually inspected
pengaman, sebaiknya dilakukan pemeriksaan while the unit is in service. Undue vibration of
saat bejana tekan berada dalam kondisi in- these parts should be noted.
service. Getaran yang tidak lazim harus dicatat.
4.2 Non Destructive Examination
4.2.1 UT Thickness Measurement

Pengukuran ketebalan UT meliputi beberapa UT thickness measurements were performed for
bagian berikut : the following :
• Dinding • Shell
• Atap • Roof
• Nosel-nosel • Nozzles
Hasil pengukuran ketebalan UT dapat dilihat di UT thickness results can be found at APPENDIX
APPENDIX B. B.

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
4.2.2 Plumbness and Roundness Measurement

Nilai maksimum yang diperbolehkan untuk The maximum out-of-plumbness of the top of the
plumbness pada bagian atas dari shell relatif shell relative to the bottom of the shell shall not
terhadap bagian bawah shell tidak boleh melebihi exceed 1/100 of the total tank height, with a
1/100 dari total tinggi tangki dengan maksimum maximum of 5 in. For roundness tolerance given
5in. Untuk toleransi roundness berdasarkan table at API 653 Table 10.2
API 653 Tabel 10.2.
Evaluasi kemiringan dan kebulatan mengacu Evaluation of plumbness and roundness based
pada API 653 Sec. 10. Hasil pengukuran on API 653 Sec. 10. Plumbness and roundness
plumbness dan roundness ditunjukkan dalam measurements results were presented at
APPENDIX C APPENDIX C.
Figure 4.1 Plumbness Tollerance
4.2.3 Settlement Measurement

Jenis dari tipe settlement tangki terdiri dari The principle types of tank settlement consist of
settlement yang berhubungan dengan shell dan settlements that relate to the tank shell and
bottom. Evaluasi penurunan pada tangki bottom plate. Evaluation of tank settlement based
mengacu pada API 653 Annex B. on API 653 Annex B.
Hasil pengukuran settlement ditunjukkan dalam Settlement measurements results were

APPENDIX D. presented at APPENDIX D.
Figure 4.2 Tank Settlement Measurement Point

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
4.2.4 Hardness Test

Pengujian Hardness dilakukan untuk mengetahui Hardness test is performed to determine
tingkat kekerasan dari material pada tangki. hardness number from material at tank.
Pada tangki ini tidak dilakukan pemeriksaan Hardness test was not performed at tank.
hardness.
4.2.5 Magnetic Particle Inspection

Pengujian MPI dilakukan untuk mengetahui MPI test is performed to identify crack at tank
retakan pada permukaan tangki termasuk bagian surface including at weldments area.
sambungan.
Hasil pemeriksaan MPI dapat dilihat pada MPI test result can be seen at Appendix B
Appendix B.

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
5. METHODOLOGY
Diagram alir untuk pekerjaan re-engineering, Flow chart for re-engineering, remaining life
remaining life assessment dan risk assessment assessment and risk assessment for tank
untuk peralatan tangki sebagai berikut : equipment as follows :
Figure 5.1 Flowchart of Atmospheric Storage Tank
5.1 Acceptence Criteria
Penilaian kondisi tangki, mengacu pada beberapa The assessment of tank condition based to
parameter sebagai berikut: several parameter as follow:
Atap Tangki Tank Roof

Pelat atap terkorosi dengan tebal rata-rata kurang Roof plates corroded to an average thickness of
dari 0.09 inch dalam area 100 in2 atau pelat atap less than 0.09 in. in any 100 in2 area or roof

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
yang terdapat banyak lubang harus diperbaiki plates with any holes through the roof plate shall
atau diganti berdasarkan API 653 Sec. 4.2.1.2. be repaired or replaced as per API 653 Sec.
4.2.1.2.
Dinding Tangki Tank Shell

Ketebalan minimum untuk tiap dinding yang telah The minimum acceptable thickness in inches for
dihitung harus tidak boleh kurang dari 0.1 inch each course as calculated shall not be less than
untuk setiap dinding berdasarkan API 653 Sec. 0.1 inch for any tank course as per API 653 Sec.
4.3.3.1. 4.3.3.1.
Dasar Tangki Tank Bottom

Ketebalan pelat dasar minimum di dasar tangki The minimum bottom plate thickness in the tank
harus lebih kecil dari setengah ketebalan pelat bottom shall be the smaller of one-half the
dasar asli (tidak termasuk tunjangan korosi asli) original bottom plate thickness (not including the
atau 50% dari tmin lebih rendah tetapi tidak kurang original corrosion allowance) or 50% of tmin of the
dari 0.1 inch berdasarkan API 653 Sec. 4.4.5.4. lower but not less than 0.1 inch as per API 653
Sec. 4.4.5.4.
Projection Plate Projection Plate

Ketebalan proyeksi pelat pada dasar di luar The thickness of the projection of the bottom
dinding yang diukur pada ujung lasan fillet bagian plate beyond the shell as measured at the toe of
luar dasar-ke-dinding harus tidak kurang dari 0.1 the outside bottom-to-shell fillet weld shall not be
inch. Proyeksi pelat pada bagian dasar terluar di less than 0.1 inch. The projection of the bottom
dinding-ke-dasar las harus minimal 3/8 inch plate beyond the outside toe of the shell-to-
berdasarkan API 653 Sec. 4.4.5.7. bottom weld shell shall be at least 3/8 inch as per
API 653 Sec. 4.4.5.7.
Kemiringan dan Kebulatan Plumbness and Roundness

Evaluasi kemiringan dan kebulatan mengacu Evaluation of plumbness and roundness based
pada API 653 Sec. 10. on API 653 Sec. 10.
Settlement Settlement
Evaluasi penurunan pada tangki mengacu pada Evaluation of tank settlement based on API 653
API 653 Annex B. Annex B.
5.2 Damage Mechanism
Beberapa parameter yang mempengaruhi jenis There are several parameters that influence the
kerusakan yakni material, temperature operasi, type of damage, such as material, operating
fluida, lingkungan, aliran dan beban (Tabel B-1 temperature, fluid, environment, flow, and
ASME PCC-3). loading (Table B-1, ASME PCC-3).

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Table 5.1 ASME PCC 3 – Damage Mechanisms Screening Table

Operating Environm ent
Materials of Construction in Which Tem perature (T)
Processes in Which Mechanism May Be Flow Type of
Mechanism Typically Occurs Range in Which
Suspected. Process Contains: Req. Loading
Mech. May Occur
Cyclic Stress (e.g., Vibratory)

Thermal Gradients or Shock
Fe-Ni Alloys (0.6—1.3 Fe:Ni
Dam age Dam age/Defect
Ni-Based Alloys (>50% Ni)

300 Series Stainless Steel
400 Series Stainless Steel

Mechanism Mode
Duplex Stainless Steel
Static Stress (Note 1)

Manufacturing Defect
Damage Mechanism
Motionless—Static
Water, Steam, Air
Phosphoric Acid
800<T<1,000˚F
Low Alloy Steel
Hydrodynamic
250<T<800˚F
Carbon Steel
Susceptibility
32<T<250˚F
Particulates
T >1,000˚F
Carbonate
Hydrogen
Crude Oil
Cu Alloys
Cast Iron
Ammonia
Al Alloys
Chloride
Sodium
Carbon
T<32˚F
Amines
Phenol
Impact
Sulfur
Other
HF
Ti
Atmospheric Corrosion Metal loss X X X X X X X Yes
Brittle Fracture Cracking X X X X X X X X X X No
Carbon dioxide corrosion Metal loss X X X X X X X No

Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking Cracking X X X X X X X X X X No
Corrosion under Insulation (Note 2) Metal loss X X X X X X X X X No
Creep and Stress Rupture Cracking X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X No

Erosion/Erosion-corrosion Metal loss X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X No
Fatigue (Note 3) Cracking X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X No
Fatigue, thermal (Note 3) Cracking X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X No
Galvanic corrosion Metal loss X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X No
Metallurgical
Graphitization X X X X X No
damage
Hydrogen temperature hydrogen
Cracking X X X X X X X X No
attack (HTHA)
Hydrogen Embrittlement Cracking X X X X X X X X X X X X X No
Micrbiologically Induced corrosion Metal loss X X X X X X X X X X X X No
Napthenic acid corrosion Metal loss X X X X X X X X X No
Oxidation Metal loss X X X X X X X X X No
Localized/Pitting corrosion (Note 5) Metal loss X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Yes
Soil Corrosion (Note 4) Metal loss X X X X X X X No
Sulfidation Metal loss X X X X X X X X X X X No
Metallurgical
Temper embrittlement X X X X X X No
damage
Uniform corrosion (Note 5) Metal loss X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Yes
5.3 Engineering Calculation

Wet H2S Damage
(Blistering/HIC/SOHIC/SSC) (Note 6)
Cracking X X X X X X X X X X No
5.3.1 Thickness minimum for Tank Shell

Ketika menentukan ketebalan minimum yang When determining the minimum acceptable
dapat diterima untuk seluruh tangki, tmin dihitung thickness for an entire shell course, tmin is
sebagai berikut (API 653 Sec 4.3.3.1) : calculated as follows (API 653 Sec 4.3.3.1):
2.6 (𝐻 − 1)𝐷𝐺
𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 =
𝑆𝐸
Dimana: Where :
• tmin adalah ketebalan minimum yang • tmin is the minimum acceptable thickness
diperbolehkan (inch). Namun, tmin tidak boleh (inch). However, tmin shall not be less than 0.1
kurang dari 0.1 in. untuk setiap tangki; in. for any tank course;
• D adalah diameter nominal tangki (ft); • D is the nominal diameter of tank (ft);
• H adalah ketinggian dari bagian bawah shell • H is the height from the bottom of the shell
yang sedang dipertimbangkan sampai tingkat course under consideration to the maximum
cairan maksimum (ft); liquid level (ft);
• G adalah gravitasi spesifik tertinggi dari • G is the highest specific gravity of the
konten; contents;
• S adalah tegangan maksimum yang diijinkan • S is the maximum allowable stress (lbf/in2);
(lbf/in2); gunakan yang lebih kecil dari 0.80Y use the smaller of 0.80Y or 0.429T for bottom
atau 0.429T untuk bagian bottom dan dinding and second course; use the smaller of 0.88Y
kedua; gunakan yang lebih kecil dari 0.88Y or 0.472T for all other courses.
atau 0.472T untuk dinding lain.

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
• Y adalah kekuatan luluh minimum yang dari • Y is the specified minimum yield strength of
pelat; gunakan 30,000 lbf/in2 jika tidak the plate; use 30,000 lbf/in2 if not known;
diketahui; • T is the smaller of the specified minimum
• T adalah kekuatan tarik minimum pelat yang tensile strength of the plate or 80,000 lbf/in2;
ditentukan atau 80,000 lbf / in2; gunakan use 55,000 lbf/in2 if not known;
55,000 lbf/in2 jika tidak diketahui; • E is the original joint efficiency for the tank.
• E adalah nilai efisiensi sambungan untuk Use Table 4.2 of API 653 if original E is
tangki. Gunakan Tabel 4.2 dari API 653 jika E unknown.
tidak diketahui.
5.3.2 Thickness minimum for Tank Bottom

Metode untuk mennghitung ketebalan minimum Method for calculating the minimum acceptable
pada dasar tangki adalah sebagai berikut (API bottom thickness as follows (API 653 Sec.
653 Sec. 4.4.5.1): 4.4.5.1):
𝑀𝑅𝑇 = (𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑅𝑇𝑏𝑐 𝑜𝑟 𝑅𝑇𝑖𝑝 ) − 𝑂𝑟 (𝑆𝑡 𝑃𝑟 + 𝑈𝑃𝑟 )
Dimana : Where :
• MRT adalah ketebalan minimum yang tersisa • MRT is the minimum remaining thickness at
pada akhir interval Or the end of interval Or
• Or adalah interval operasi layanan (tahun ke • Or is the in-service interval of operation (years
inspeksi internal berikutnya) to next internal inspection)
• RTbc adalah ketebalan minimum yang tersisa • RTbc is the minimum remaining thickness from
dari korosi sisi bawah setelah perbaikan bottom side corrosion after repairs
• RTip adalah ketebalan minimum yang tersisa • RTip is the minimum remaining thickness from
dari korosi internal setelah perbaikan; internal corrosion after repairs;
• StPr adalah laju korosi maksimum yang tidak • StPr is the maximum rate of corrosion not
diperbaiki di sisi atas repaired on the top side
• UPr adalah laju korosi maksimum di sisi • UPr is the maximum rate of corrosion on the
bawah. bottom side.
5.3.3 Corrosion Rate

Laju korosi dihitung berdasar rumus berikut: The corrosion rate was calculated from the
following formula:
𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 − 𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙
𝐿𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑇𝑒𝑟𝑚 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 (𝐿𝑇) =
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 (𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠)
or
𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 − 𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙
𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑇𝑒𝑟𝑚 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 (𝑆𝑇) =
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 (𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠)

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Dimana : Where :
• t sebelumnya : Tebal sebelumnya yang diukur • t previous: thick were measured during the
selama inspeksi sebelumnya. previous inspection .
• t initial : Ketebalan pada saat fabrikasi. • t initial: The thickness at fabrication
• t aktual: Ketebalan pengukuran terakhir. • t actual: The thickness at last measurement.
Apabila hasil perhitungan laju korosi tidak If the calculation of the corrosion rate cannot be
didapatkan (short term maupun long term) maka obtained (short term or long term method) ,the
akan menggunakan perhitungan laju korosi dari corrosion rate calculation from the API 581
standar API 581 Section 2.B.14 antara lain : Section 2.B.14 as following
a) Soil Side Corrosion Rate (External Corrosion) a) Soil Side Corrosion Rate (External
Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi korosi sisi Corrosion)
tanah adalah jenis tanah (FSR), jenis pad Factors affecting soil side corrosion are soil
(FPA), pengeringan air (FTD), perlindungan type(FSR), pad type (FPA), water draining
katodik (FCP), desain bottom tangki (FTB) dan (FTD), cathodic protection (FCP), Tank bottom
suhu operasi (FST) dari proses yang design (FTB) and operating temperature (FST)
disimpan. Penentuan laju korosi sisi tanah of the process stored. Determination of soil
(CRS) dihitung sebagai berikut: side corrosion rate (CRS) is calculated as
follows:
𝐶𝑅𝑠 = 𝐶𝑅𝑆𝐵 . 𝐹𝑆𝑅 . 𝐹𝑃𝐴 . 𝐹𝑇𝐷 . 𝐹𝐶𝑃 . 𝐹𝑇𝐵 . 𝐹𝑆𝑇
Dimana : Where :
• CRSB, laju korosi dasar sisi tanah. Jika data • CRSB, the soil side base corrosion rate. If this
ini tidak tersedia, maka laju korosi sisi tanah data is not available, then the base soil side
dasar dapat diasumsikan 0.13 mm/y (5 mpy). corrosion rate may be assumed to be 0.13
mm/y (5 mpy).
b) Product Side Corrosion Rate (Internal b) Product Side Corrosion Rate (Internal
Corrosion) Corrosion)
Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi korosi sisi Factors affecting product side corrosion is
produk adalah jenis produk (FPC), the stored product (FPC), operating
temperature operasi (FPT), system coil (FSC), temperature (FPT), steam coil practices (FSC)
dan keberadaan air di tangki (FWD). and the presence of water in the tank (FWD).
Penentuan laju korosi sisi produk (CRP) Determination of product side corrosion rate
dihitung sebagai berikut: (CRP) is calculated as follows:
𝐶𝑅𝑃 = 𝐶𝑅𝑃𝐵 . 𝐹𝑃𝐶 . 𝐹𝑃𝑇 . 𝐹𝑆𝐶 . 𝐹𝑊𝐷

Dimana : Where :
• CRPB, Laju korosi baku dari bagian produk. , • CRPB, the product side base corrosion rate. If
Jika data tidak tersedia, maka dapat this data is not available, then it may be
diasumsikan 0.05 mm/y (2 mpy) assumed to be 0.05 mm/y (2 mpy).
c) Tingkat Korosi Kombinasi c) Combination Corrosion Rate

Disarankan bahwa laju korosi gabungan tidak It is recommended that the combined

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
boleh ditetapkan lebih rendah dari 2 mils per corrosion rate should not be set lower than 2
tahun. mils per year.
- Opsi 1 - Dalam hal ini, laju internal dan - Option 1 –. In this case, the internal and
eksternal adalah tambahan. external rates are additive.
- Opsi 2 - Dalam hal ini, pengguna memilih - Option 2 –. In this case, the user chooses
yang lebih besar dari keduanya. the greater of the two corrosion rates.
5.4 Remaining Life Assessment
Sisa umur dari Tangki (dalam tahun) dapat The remaining life of the tank (in years) shall be
dihitung dengan rumus berikut ini : calculated from the following formula:
𝑡 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 − 𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑
𝑅𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒 =
𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒
Dimana : Where :
• t aktual, ketebalan pengukuran terakhir. • t actual: The thickness at last measurement.
• t required, tebal yang diperlukan pada • t required, the required thickness at the
komponen, sebagai pengukuran t aktual. component, as the t actual measurement. It is
Dihitung dengan rumus desain. computed by the design formulas.
5.5 Risk Assessment
5.5.1 Probability of Failure (PoF)

Persamaan yang digunakan dalam perhitungan The equation for POF calculation as follows (API
POF adalah sebagai berikut (API RP 581 2016) : RP 581 2016):
POF = DFt x GFF x FMS
Dimana : Where :
POF = Probability of Failure POF = Probability of Failure
GFF = Generic Failure Frequency GFF = Generic Failure Frequency
DFt = Total Damage Factor DFt = Total Damage Factor
FMS = Management System Factor FMS = Management System Factor
5.5.1.1 Total Damage Factor

Total damage factor dapat dilakukan dengan Total damage factor can be calculated using the
menggunakan formula sebagai berikut : following formula:
𝐷𝐹𝑡 = max[𝐷𝐹 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 , 𝐷𝐹 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑑 ] + 𝐷𝐹 𝑠𝑐𝑐 + 𝐷𝐹 𝑚𝑓𝑎𝑡
Berdasarkan API 581 – 2016, faktor kerusakan According to API 581 - 2016, the damage factor
terbagi menjadi empat jenis, yaitu : is divided into four types, namely:

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Table 5.2 Damage Factor Types and Descriptions

Damage Factor Description
The DF is subjected to damage mechanism that cause general or
Thinning
local thinning (internal corrosion)
The DF is subjected to damage mechanism that cause Stress
Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC)
Corrosion Cracking (SCC)
The DF is subjected to damage mechanism that cause general or
External Damage
local thinning (external corrosion)
Mechanical Fatigue (Piping Only) The DF is subjected to fatigue failures of piping systems
5.5.1.2 Generic Failure Frequency (GFF)

Nilai GFF mengacu pada API 581 Tabel 3.1 . GFF value based on API 581 Table 31.
5.5.1.3 Management System Factor (FMS)

Nilai FMS menggunakan nilai average 50% (API FMS value using average value 50% (API 581.
581 Sec. 3.5.4)
5.5.2 Consequence of Failure (COF)

Metodologi COF menggunakan perhitungan The COF methodology uses Level 1
Level 1 Consequence berbasis area Level 1 Consequence area-based calculations as per API
sesuai API 581 Section 4. 581 Section 4.
5.5.3 Risk Determination

Dalam istilah matematis, risiko dapat disimpulkan In mathematical terms, risk can be expressed as:
sebagai berikut:
𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑘 = 𝑃𝑂𝐹 × 𝐶𝑂𝐹
Tipe matrik yang digunakan untuk penentuan The matrix type for determination of risk category
kategori resiko adalah unbalance matrik sesuai is unbalance matrix as per API 581
dengan API 581.
Medium Medium Medium High

5 High High
High High High
Probability of Failure
Medium Medium Medium High

4 Medium Medium High
High High Medium
(POF)
Medium
3 Low Low Medium
High
High Low
Medium
2 Low Low Medium Medium
High
Medium
1 Low Low Medium Medium
High
A B C D E
Consequence of Failure (COF)
Figure 5.2 Matrix for Risk Category

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Hasil pehitungan secara kuantitatif yang telah The result of Quantitative calculation have been
dilakukan di plot pada risk matriks 5x5 plotted on a 5x5 risk matrix uses the following
menggunakan range sebagai berikut: range:
Table 5.3 Range Category of PoF and CoF

POF COF COF Range
POF Range
Categories Categories Area Based, CA (m2)
1 POF  3.06E-05 A CA  9.29
2 3.06E-05 < POF  3.06E-04 B 9.29 < CA  92.9
3 3.06E-04 < POF  3.06E-03 C 92.9 < CA  929
4 3.06E-03 < POF  3.06E-02 D 929 < CA  9290
5 POF > 3.06E-02 E CA > 9290
Interval perhitungan risiko pada static equipment Risk calculation interval on static equipment uses
menggunakan 4 tahun, dengan tujuan 4 years, for purpose equalizing time-based
menyamakan dengan interval time based. intervals.
5.6 Inspection Plan
Pemeriksaan berjangka harus dijadwalkan, Examinations must be scheduled at intervals that

berdasarkan jenis kerusakan, laju dari kerusakan, consider type of damage, rate of damage
toleransi peralatan kepada jenis kerusakan, progression, tolerance of the equipment to the
kemungkinan dari metode NDE yang digunakan type of damage, probability of the NDE method
untuk identifikasi kerusakan dan jangka waktu to identify the damage and maximum intervals as
maksimum yang disebutkan pada codes dan defined in codes and standards (ASME PCC 3
standart (ASME PCC 3 Appendix C). Appendix C).
Table 5.4 ASME PCC 3 Appendix C- Inspection and Monitoring Method

Common Examination Methods Used to Identify (Note 1)
Damage/Defect
Mode Surface Subsurface Other Methods
Wet Fluorescent Magnetic Particle
Magnetic Particle Test - MT (Note
Ultrasonics Shear Wave - UTSW

Ultrasonics Straight Beam - UTS
Liquid Penetrant Test - PT (Note
Ultrasonics for Thickness - UT

Fluorescent Liquid Penetrant -
Ultrasonics Shear Wave Adv.
Dimensional Measurements
Accoustic Emmision - AE
Visual Test - VT (Note 3)
In-Place Metallography
Techniques - UTSWA
Manufacturing Defect
Damage Mechanism
Damage
Mode (Note 2)
Eddy Current - ET
Boat/Plug Sample
Radiography - RT
Mechanism
- WFMT (Note 4)
Hardness Test
FPT (Note 3)
(Replication)
3)
4)
Atmospheric Corrorion Metal loss X X X

Brittle fracture Cracking X X
Carbon dioxide corrosion Metal loss X X X X
Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking Cracking X X X
Corrosion under Insulation (Note 2) Metal loss X X X X
Creep and Stress Rupture Cracking X X X X X X X X X X

Erosion/Erosion-corrosion Metal loss X X X X
Fatigue (Note 3) Cracking X X X X X X X X X X X X
Fatigue, thermal (Note 3) Cracking X X X X X X X X X X X X
Galvanic corrosion Metal loss X X X X
Metallurgical
Graphitization X X X X
damage
Hydrogen temperature hydrogen
Cracking X X X X X X
attack (HTHA)
Hydrogen-induced
Engineering Consultancy Services crack (HIC) Cracking X X X X X X X X X X X
Ruko Golden Boulevard Blok KEmbrittlement
Hydrogen No. 1, BSD City, Tangerang Cracking
15322, Indonesia X X X X X X X X X
Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Hydrogen Blistering
Website: www.dtp-eng.com Email: info@dtp-eng.com Blistering X X
Micrbiologically Induced corrosion Metal loss X X X X X
Napthenic acid corrosion Metal loss X X X X
Oxidation Metal loss X X X X X
Localized/Pitting corrosion Metal loss X X X X X
Soil Corrosion Metal loss X X X
Sulfidation Metal loss X X X X X
6. RESULT
6.1 Damage Mechanism
Beberapa kemungkinan jenis mekanisme Tthe following damage mechanisms are

kerusakan yang diduga terjadi pada tangki adalah expected to occurs at atmospheric storage tank:
sebagai berikut :
Table 6.1 Damage Mechanism Screening Result
No Damage Mechanisms Mode Location

1 Atmospheric Corrosion Metal Loss Roof, Annular plate, Shell
2 Uniform Corrosion Metal Loss Roof, Shell and Bottom
3 Pitting Corrosion Metal Loss Roof, Shell and Bottom
4 Erosion/corrosion Metal Loss Shell
5 Under Deposit corrosion / MIC Metal Loss Bottom
6 Soil Corrosion Metal Loss Bottom
7 Hydrogen embrittlement Metallurgical damage Welding Joint
8 Brittle Fracture Cracking Welding Joint
9 Corrosion Fatigue Cracking Welding Joint
6.2 Thickness Calculation
Ketebalan minimum pada atap, dinding, dasar dan The minimum thickness of roof, shell, bottom
pelat proyeksi pada tangki dari hasil inspeksi dan and projection plate of tank from inspection
perhitungan teknis ditampilkan dalam tabel results and engineering calculations performed
berikut: was presented in the following table:
Table 6.2 Result of Thickness Calculations

Nominal Min. Actual Required Min. Thickness
Component Thickness Thickness Thickness Calculation Remarks3
(mm) (mm)1 (mm) (mm)2
Roof 8 6.88 4.65 - Acceptable
Shell 1 18 18.25 4.61 2.83 Acceptable
Bottom Plate 10 10.19 2.54 0.26 Acceptable
Annular Plate 10 19.27 4.32 17.69 Acceptable
Note :
1. Based on latest inspection reports : minimum thickness Roof at Plate 28, Shell 1 at Plate 7, Shell 2 at Plate 8, Shell 3
at Plate 8, Shell 4 at Plate 6, Bottom Plate at Plate 86, Annular Plate at Plate 9
2. Based on calculation equation at API 653 Sec. 4.4.5.4
3. Acceptable when minimum actual thickness greater than required thickness

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
6.3 Remaining Life
Hasil perhitungan dari laju korosi dan sisa umur The calculation results of corrosion rate and
ditampilkan pada tabel berikut : remaining life was presented in the following
table :
Table 6.3 Result of Corrosion Rate and Remaining Life Calculation

Corrosion rate
(mm/year)1
T T T Remaining
Combination2
Component Nom actual required Life
Long Short Soil Product Pitting
(mm) (mm) (mm) (years)
Term Term Side Side General and
Localized
Roof 8 6.88 4.65 0.160 - - 0.050 - 0.050 13
Shell 1 18 18.25 4.61 - - 0.108 0.050 0.158 0.108 86
Shell 2 18 16.08 3.02 0.274 - 0.108 0.050 0.158 0.108 47
Shell 3 14 12.64 2.54 0.194 - 0.108 0.050 0.158 0.108 51
Shell 4 12 11.1 2.54 0.129 - 0.108 0.050 0.158 0.108 54
Bottom 10 10.19 2.54 - - 0.108 0.050 0.158 0.108 48
Annular 10 19.27 4.32 - - 0.108 0.050 0.158 0.108 94
Note :
1. Maximum value of corrosion rate between Long Term, Short Term, Soil Side, Product Side Corrosion Rate and
Combination Corrosion Rate
2. Combination corrosion rate between Soil-Side (External Corrosion) and Product-Side Corrosion Rate (Internal Corrosion)
determination based on API 581.
6.4 Plumbness and Roundness
Hasil pengukuran dan perhitungan dari The inspection and calculation results for
kemiringan dan kebulatan tangki ditampilkan plumbness and roundness of tank was presented
pada tabel berikut: in the following table :
Table 6.4 Plumbness Result
Point Angle (deg) Plumbness (mm) Max Out of plumbness tolerance (mm) Remarks1
1 0˚ 14.5 ± 80 Acceptable
2 45˚ -9.6 ± 80 Acceptable
3 90˚ -11.2 ± 80 Acceptable
4 135˚ -6.4 ± 80 Acceptable
5 180˚ -6.5 ± 80 Acceptable
6 225˚ -11.1 ± 80 Acceptable
7 270˚ -16.6 ± 80 Acceptable
8 315˚ -16.7 ± 80 Acceptable
Note :
1. Acceptable when actual plumbness lower than max-out of plumbness tolerance

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
6.5 Settlement
Hasil pengukuran dan perhitungan dari The inspection and calculation results for
penurunan tangki ditampilkan pada tabel berikut: settlement of tank was presented in the following
table :
Table 6.5 Settlement Result
Out of Plane Allowable

Elevation
Point Angle (deg) Deflection Remarks1
Value (mm) Settlement (mm) Deflection (mm) (mm)
1 0 8.012 0.254 0.254 ± 59.83 Acceptable
2 40 8.012 0.508 0.381 ± 59.83 Acceptable
3 80 8.012 -0.254 -0.508 ± 59.83 Acceptable
4 120 8.012 0 0.127 ± 59.83 Acceptable
5 160 8.012 -0.508 -0.508 ± 59.83 Acceptable
6 200 8.012 0.254 0.508 ± 59.83 Acceptable
7 240 8.012 0.508 0.381 ± 59.83 Acceptable
8 280 8.012 -0.254 -0.508 ± 59.83 Acceptable
9 320 8.012 0.254 0.381 ± 59.83 Acceptable
10 360 8.012 -0.762 -1.016 ± 59.83 Acceptable
Note :
1. Acceptable when actual out of plane (settlement and/or deflection) lower than allowable deflection
6.6 MPI Test
Dari hasil pengukuran MPI di dapatkan hasil From the results of measurements of MPI as the
sebagai berikut: following:
Table 6.6 MPI Result

No Location Result1
1 Manhole 1 Acceptable
2 Manhole 2 Acceptable
3 Nozzle 1 Acceptable
Note :
1. Acceptable result as per Appendix B for MPI Report
Dari hasil pemeriksaan MPI yang telah dilakukan, From the results of the MPI examination that has
tidak ditemukan indikasi retak pada daerah lasan. been carried out, no indications of cracks have
been found in the weld area.

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
6.7 Risk Assessment
Hasil perhitungan resiko berdasarkan nilai PoF The result of risk calculation based on PoF and
dan CoF adalah sebagai berikut CoF as follows :
Table 6.7 Result of Risk Assessment
Component Risk Assessment at 2019 Risk Assessment at 2023

Name CoF 1
PoF Risk Category CoF 1
PoF Risk Category
Shell 1 573.1998 8.4013E-05 Medium (2C) 573.1998 0.00068 Medium (3C)
Shell 2 573.1998 0.0003 Medium (2C) 573.1998 0.00147 Medium (3C)
Note :
1. Consequence of Failure (CoF) determination by Area-Based (m2) calculation
5 5
4 4
(POF)
(POF)
3 3
2 2
1 1
A B C D E A B C D E
Consequence of Failure (COF) Consequence of Failure (COF)
Risk at 2019 Risk at 2023
Figure 6.1 Result of Risk Category
Dari gambar dan tabel diatas, menunjukkan From the picture and table above, it shows that
tangki T-01 5000KL mengalami kenaikan kategori the 5000KL T-01 tank has increased in risk
resiko dari 2C (Medium) menjadi 3C (Medium) category from 2C (Medium) to 3C (Medium) for
untuk 4 tahun kedepan. Nilai PoF yang the next 4 years. The increased PoF value is
meningkat disebabkan oleh nilai laju korosi pada caused by the value of corrosion rate in shell 2
shell 2 (0.274 mm/years). Sehingga nilai total (0.274 mm / years). So the value of the total
factor kerusakan meningkat dari 11.378 (tahun damage factor increased from 11.378 (in 2019)
2019) menjadi 195.794 (tahun 2023). to 195.794 (in 2023).
Detail perhitungan resiko dapat dilihat pada Detail risk calculation can be seen at APPENDIX
APPENDIX D. D.
6.8 Inspection Plan and Method
Berdasarkan dari metode inspeksi dan monitoring, Based on inspection and monitoring methods,
perencanaan inspeksi yang diajukan untuk tangki the proposed inspection plan for this storage
timbun ini adalah sebagai berikut: tank as follow:

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Table 6.8 Inspection Method and Coverage
Damage Inspection
No Coverage Area
Mechanisms methods
Atmospheric Visual Visual inspection of >95% of the exposed surface

1 Roof & Shell
Corrosion Inspection area with follow-up by UT, RT or pit gauge as required
2 Uniform Corrosion
Visual inspection with pit depth gage measurements
UT Thickness /
3 Pitting Corrosion at suspect locations and UT follow up on suspect Shell
Scanning
location and as general confirmation of wall thickness
4 Erosion/corrosion
Under Deposit Broom swept, Effective supplementary light, Visual
5 UT Thickness /
corrosion / MIC 100% (API 653), Pit depth gauge with UT Follow Up Bottom
Scanning
6 Soil Corrosion or Floor scan >50%
Hydrogen
7
embrittlement
UT Flaw
Examine >35% for selected welds / weld area
8 Brittle Fracture Scanning or MPI
(Nozzles-to-shell, shell-to-bottom, shell-to-shell, bottom Weld Joint
plate, T- joints)
9 Corrosion Fatigue
Rekomendasi perencanaan dan metode inspeksi Recommended Inspection plan and method from
yang dilakukan dari luar tanki adalah : outside tank as follows :
Table 6.9 Interval Inspection from Outside Tank

No Inspection Subsection Remark Interval
API 653
1 Routine In-service Inspection By owner/operator 1 month 1 month
Sec. 6.3.1
API 653
Jurisdictional Regulations 4 Years
Sec. 6.2.3
API 653
2 External Inspection At Least Every 5 Years 4 years
Sec. 6.3.2.1
API 653
RCA/4N1 5 Years
Sec. 6.3.2.1
Minimum Roof Plate 13 Years
Remaining Life
Calculation Shell Plate 47 years
API 653
Ultrasonic Thickness Corrosion Rate Unknown 5 Years
3 Sec. 6.3.3.2.a 4 years
Inspection
API 653 Corrosion Rate Known (RCA/2N1) 11 Years
Sec. 6.3.3.2.b Or 15 Years
API 653
Jurisdiction requirement 4 Years
Sec. 6.2.3
API 653
4 Cathodic Protection Survey By owner/operator 3 month 3 month
Sec. 6.3.4.2
Rekomendasi perencanaan dan metode inspeksi Recommended Inspection plan and method from
yang dilakukan dari dalam tanki adalah : inside tank as follows :

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Table 6.10 Interval Inspection from Inside Tank
No Inspection Subsection Remark2 Interval3

a Initial Interval Inspection 10 Years
Present of Fiberglass-
b 0 Years
Reinforced Lining
Present of Internal Thin-Film
c 0 Years
API 653 Coating Max at
1 Internal Inspection
Sec. 6.4.2.1 d Present of Cathodic Protection 0 Years 2029
Present of Release Prevention
e 0 Years
Barrier
Cummulative Value
10 Years
(a + b + c + d + e + f)
Note :
1. RCA is the difference between the minimum measured shell thickness and the required thickness and N is the shell
corrosion rate.
2. Internal inspection is a cummulative value based on available criteria of tanks safeguard as per Table 6.1 API 653. If
tank safeguards not found, the value of years should be zero (0).
3. Interval of internal inspection is the result from addition of the last inspection of internal inspection – bottom plate (year)
and the cumulative value of tanks safeguard criteria (year).

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
7. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS

Dapat disimpulkan bahwa Storage Tank 5000 It can be concluded that Storage Tank 5000 KL
KL 1081-T-010 dalam keadaan baik dengan 1081-T-010 is in good condition to be operated
kondisi operasi sebagai berikut : as parameter below :
General Data
Equipment T-01 (5000 KL)
Tag no. / Serial no. T-01/1081-T-010
Design Pressure ATM
Design Temperature 40 oC
Remaining Life Assessment API 653 Risk Asessement
Actual Required Corrosion
Remaining
Component Thickness Thickness Rate Plumbness Settlement 2019 2023
Life (years)
(mm) (mm) (mm/year)
Roof 6.88 4.65 0.160 13 Medium Medium
Acceptable Acceptable
(2C) (3C)
Shell 1 18.25 4.61 0.158 86 Medium Medium
(2C) (3C)
(2C) (3C)
(2C) (3C)
(2C) (3C)
Bottom 10.19 2.54 0.158 48 Medium Medium
(2C) (3C)
Annular 19.27 4.32 0.158 94 Medium Medium
(2C) (3C)
Inspection and Method
Damage Mechanisms Inspection methods Coverage Area Interval
Visual inspection of >95% of the
Atmospheric Corrosion Visual Inspection Roof, Shell,
exposed surface area with follow-up
Annular
by UT, RT or pit gauge as required
Uniform Corrosion Visual inspection with pit depth gage
Pitting Corrosion UT Thickness / measurements at suspect locations
Roof, Shell, Next 4
and UT follow up on suspect location
Scanning Annular years
Erosion/corrosion and as general confirmation of wall
thickness
Hydrogen embrittlement Examine >35% for selected welds /
UT Flaw Scanning or
Corrosion Fatigue weld area (Nozzles-to-shell, shell-to- Weld Joint
MPI
Brittle Fracture shell, T- joints)
Under Deposit Broom swept, Effective supplementary
corrosion/MIC UT Thickness/ Flaw light, Visual 100% (API 653), Pit depth Max at
Bottom
Scanning gauge with UT Follow Up or Floor 2029
Soil Corrosion scan >50%
Direkomendasikan untuk merawat kondisi tanki It is recommended to maintenance the tank

dalam keadaan tetap siap beroperasi seperti conditions to stay in fit for services as the
rekomendasi berikut : following recommendations:

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
• Melakukan inspeksi eksternal rutin dan • Perform routine external inspection and UT
pengukuran ketebalan UT sesuai dengan thickness measurements based on
interval yang direkomendasikan. (API 653 recommended method and interval (API
Sec 6.3.3) 653 Sec 6.3.3)
• Melakukan internal inspeksi untuk • Perform internal inspection to ensure
memastikan integritas dari dasar tangki, integrity of the bottom, max at 2029 (API
pada tahun 2029 (API 653 Sec 6.4) 653 Sec 6.4)
• Menjaga area drainage dan pondasi dari • Keep drainage & foundation area from
rumput dan perangkap air (API 653 Sec weed and water trap. (API 653 Sec 4.4.2).
4.4.2).
• Melakukan pemasangan cathodic protection • Perform installation of cathodic protection
pada tanki ini. (API RP 651) system at this tank (API RP 651)
• Melakukan pemasangan dan pengukuran • Perform installation and routine
grounding sistem secara rutin (API 2003). measurement grounding system (API
• Memasang nameplate sesuai API 653 Sec 2003).
13 • Install nameplate as requirement of API
653 Sec 13.

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
APPENDIX A - ENGINEERING CALCULATION

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
PG 1::> ETANK FULL REPORT - 201939 - T-01
ETank2000 Full 1.9.14 (26 Oct 2010)
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1
ETANK SETTINGS SUMMARY PAGE 2
SUMMARY OF DESIGN DATA AND REMARKS PAGE 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS PAGE 4
ROOF DESIGN PAGE 7
BOTTOM DESIGN PAGE 18
CAPACITIES AND WEIGHTS PAGE 24
MAWP & MAWV SUMMARY PAGE 25
PG 2::>ETANK SETTINGS SUMMARY
To Change These ETank Settings, Go To Tools->Options, Behavior Tab.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
No 650 Appendix F Calcs when Tank P = 0 -> Default : False
-> This Tank : False
Show MAWP / MAWV Calcs : True
Enforce API Minimum thicknesses : True
Enforce API Maximum Roof thickness : True
Enforce Minimum Self Supp. Cone Pitch (2 in 12) : True
Force Non-Annular Btm. to Meet API-650 5.5.1 : False
Set t.actual to t.required Values : False
Maximum 650 App. S or App. M Multiplier is 1 : True
Enforce API Maximum Nozzle Sizes : True
Max. Self Supported Roof thickness : 5 in.
Max. Tank Corr. Allowance : 5 in.
External pressure calcs subtract C.A. per V.5 : False
Use Gauge Material for min thicknesses : False
Enforce API Minimum Live Load : True
Enforce API Minimum Anchor Chair Design Load
= Bolt Yield Load : True
PG 3::>SUMMARY OF DESIGN DATA and REMARKS
Job : 201939 - T-01

Date of Calcs. : 04/09/2019 , 06:51
Mfg. or Insp. Date : 04/09/2019
Designer : BKI PALEMBANG
Project : 201939 5000KL
Tag Number : T01
Plant : PT. PEC TECH
Plant Location : PELALAWAN
Site : FUTONG PORT
Design Basis : API-653 4th Edition, April 2009,
& API-650 11th Edition, Addendum 2, Nov 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- TANK NAMEPLATE INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Operating Ratio: 0,4
- Design Standard:
- API-650 11th Edition, Addendum 2, Nov 2009 -
- (None) -
- Roof : Unknown Carbon Steel: 0,271in. -
- Shell (4): Unknown Carbon Steel: 0,437in. -
- Bottom : Unknown Carbon Steel: 0,401in. -
- Annular Ring : Unknown Carbon Steel: 0,759in. -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Design Internal Pressure = 0 PSI or 0 IN. H2O

Design External Pressure = 0 PSI or 0 IN. H2O
MAWP = 0,1310 PSI or 3,63 IN. H2O

MAWV = -0,3430 PSI or -9,51 IN. H2O
OD of Tank = 95,46 ft
Shell Height = 26,25 ft
S.G. of Contents = 0,88
Max. Liq. Level = 20 ft
Re-Rate Temperature = 104 °F

Tank Joint Efficiency = 1
Ground Snow Load = 0 lbf/ft^2

Roof Live Load = 20 lbf/ft^2
Design Roof Dead Load = 0 lbf/ft^2
Basic Wind Velocity = 100 mph

Wind Importance Factor = 1
Using Seismic Method: NONE
DESIGN NOTES
NOTE 1 : Tank is not subject to API-650 Appendix F.7
PG 4::>SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Shell Material Summary (Bottom is 1)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shell Width Material Sd St Weight CA
# (ft) (psi) (psi) (lbf) (in)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 6,562 Unknown Carbon Steel 25.960 27.000 35.072 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Weight 183.523
Shell API 653 Summary (Bottom is 1)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shell t.design(Sd) t.test(St) t.external t.required t.actual
# (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
4 0 0 0 0,1 0,437
3 0,0541 0,0541 0 0,1 0,498
2 0,1188 0,1188 0 0,1188 0,633
1 0,1814 0,1814 0 0,1814 0,719
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Structurally Supported Conical Roof

Plate Material = Unknown Carbon Steel,
Struct. Material = Unknown Carbon Steel
t.required = 0,1832 in.

t.actual = 0,271 in.
Roof Joint Efficiency = 1
Plate Weight = 79.241 lbf
Rafters:
43 Rafters at Rad. 47,73 ft.:
Rafters Weight = 0 lbf
Girders:
Girders Weight = 0 lbf
Columns:
1 Column at Center:
Columns Weight = 0 lbf
Bottom Type: Flat Bottom: Annular

Bottom Floor Material = Unknown Carbon Steel
t.required = 0,1 in.
Bottom Joint Efficiency = 1
PG 5::> Annular Bottom Plate Material : Unknown Carbon Steel

Minimum Annular Ring Thickness = 0,17 in.
t_Annular_Ring = 0,759 in.
Minimum Annular Ring Width = 24 in.
W_Annular_Ring = 24 in.
Total Weight of Bottom = 127.459 lbf
PG 6::>SUPPORTED CONICAL ROOF (from Brownell & Young)

Roof Plate Material: Unknown Carbon Steel, Sd = 25.960 PSI, Fy = 30.000 PSI
«
(API-650 Table 5-
2b)
Structural Material: Unknown Carbon Steel, Sd = 25.960 PSI, Fy = 30.000 PSI
«
(API-650 Table 5-
2b)
R = 47,73 ft
pt = 0,75 in/ft (Cone Roof Pitch)
Theta = ATAN(pt/12) = ATAN(0,0625) = 3,5763 degrees
Ap_Vert = Vertical Projected Area of Roof

= pt*OD^2/48
= 0,75*95,46^2/48
= 142,385 ft^2
Horizontal Projected Area of Roof (Per API-650 5.2.1.f)
Xw = Moment Arm of UPLIFT wind force on roof

= 0.5*OD
= 0.5*95,46
= 47,73 ft
Ap = Projected Area of roof for wind moment
= PI*R^2
= PI*47,73^2
= 7.157 ft^2
S = Ground Snow Load = 0 lbf/ft^2

Sb = Balanced Design Snow Load = 0 lbf/ft^2
Su = Unbalanced Design Snow Load = 0 lbf/ft^2
Dead_Load = Insulation + Plate_Weight + Added_Dead_Load

= (8)(0/12) + 11,0555 + 0
= 11,0555 lbf/ft^2
Roof Loads (per API-650 Appendix R)
Pe = PV*144 = 0*144 = 0 lbf/ft^2
e.1b = DL + MAX(Sb,Lr) + 0,4*Pe

= 11,0555 + 20 + 0,4*0
= 31,056 lbf/ft^2
e.2b = DL + Pe + 0,4*MAX(Sb,Lr)
= 11,0555 + 0 + 0,4*20
= 19,056 lbf/ft^2
T = Balanced Roof Design Load (per API-650 Appendix R)

= MAX(e.1b,e.2b)
= 31,056 lbf/ft^2
e.1u = DL + MAX(Su,Lr) + 0,4*Pe

= 11,0555 + 20 + 0,4*0
= 31,056 lbf/ft^2
e.2u = DL + Pe + 0,4*MAX(Su,Lr)
= 11,0555 + 0 + 0,4*20
= 19,056 lbf/ft^2
PG 7::> U = Unbalanced Roof Design Load (per API-650 Appendix R)

= MAX(e.1u,e.2u)
= 31,056 lbf/ft^2
Lr_1 = MAX(T,U) = 31,056 lbf/ft^2
P = Max. Design Load = Lr_1

= 31,056 lbf/ft^2
= 0,2157 PSI
l = Maximum Rafter Spacing (Per API-650 5.10.4.4)

= (t - ca) * SQRT(1.5 * Fy / P)
= (0,271 - 0)*SQRT(1,5*30.000/0,2157)
= 123,79 in.
MINIMUM # OF RAFTERS
< FOR OUTER SHELL RING >
l = 84 in. since calculated l > 84 in. (7 ft)
N_min = 2*PI*R/l = 2*PI*(47,73)(12)/84 = 42,84
N_min = 43
Actual # of Rafters = 43
Minimum roof thickness based on actual rafter spacing
l = 83,69 in. (actual rafter spacing)
t-Calc = l/SQRT(1.5*Fy/p) + CA
= 83,69/SQRT(1.5*30.000/0,2157) + 0
= 0,1832 in.
NOTE: Governs for roof plate thickness.
RLoad_Max = Maximum Roof Load based on actual rafter spacing
RLoad_Max = 216(Fy)/(l/(t - ca))^2

= 216(30.000)/(83,69/(0,271 - 0))^2
= 90,6 lb/ft^2
Let Max_T1 = RLoad_Max
P_ext_1 (Vacuum limited by actual rafter spacing)

= -[Max_T1 - DL - 0,4 * Max(Snow_Load,Lr)]/144
= -[90,6 - 11,0555 - 0,4 * Max(0,20)]/144
= -0,4968 PSI or -13,77 IN. H2O
Pa_rafter_1 = P_ext_1
= -0,4968 PSI or -13,77 IN H2O.
t.required Must be >= 0,09 in. (per API-653)
t.required = MAX( 0.09 , t-Calc )

= 0,1832 in.
PG 8::>RAFTER DESIGN
Maximum Rafter Span = 47,73 ft

Average Rafter Spacing on Shell = 6,968 ft
Shell Ring: Rafter Type not yet Assigned.
* * Warning * *Rafters not yet chosen for Outer Shell
PG 9::>COLUMN DESIGN
* * * NOTE * * *
NO COLUMN DESIGN CALCS PEFORMED BECAUSE COLUMN TYPE NOT SELECTED.
Roof_Area = 36*PI*OD^2/COS(Theta)
= 36*PI*(95,46)^2/COS(9,4623)
= 1.032.623 in^2
ROOF WEIGHT
Weight of Roof Plates

= (density)(t)(PI/4)(12*OD - t)^2/COS(Theta)
= (0,2833)(0,271)(PI/4)(1.146 - 0,271)^2/COS(3,5763)
= 79.241 lbf (New)
= 79.241 lbf (Corroded)
Weight of Roof Plates supported by shell

= 79.241 lbf (New)
Weight of Rafters = 0 lbf (New)

Weight of Girders = 0 lbf (New)
Weight of Columns = 0 lbf (New)
Total Weight of Roof = 79.241 lbf (New)

<Actual Participating Area of Roof-to-Shell Juncture>
(From API-650 Figure F-2)

Wc = 0,6 * SQRT[Rc * (t-CA)] (Top Shell Course)
= 0,6 * SQRT[572,323 * (0,437 - 0)]
= 9,4888 in.
(From API-650 Figure F-2)
Wh = 0,3 * SQRT[R2 * (t-CA)] (or 12", whichever is less)
= 0,3 * SQRT[9.182 * (0,271 - 0)]
= MIN(14,965, 12)
= 12 in.
Top End Stiffener: NONE

Aa = (Cross-sectional Area of Top End Stiffener)
= 0 in^2
Ashell = Contributing Area due to shell plates

= Wc*(t_shell - CA)
= 9,4888 * (0,437 - 0)
= 4,147 in^2
Aroof = Contributing Area due to roof plates

= Wh*(t_roof - CA)
= 12 * (0,271 - 0)
= 3,252 in^2
PG 10::> A = Actual Part. Area of Roof-to-Shell Juncture (per API-650)

= Aa + Aroof + Ashell
= 0 + 3,252 + 4,147
= 7,399 in^2
< Uplift on Tank > (per API-650 F.1.2)
NOTE: This flat bottom tank is assumed supported by the bottom plate.
If tank not supported by a flat bottom, then uplift calculations
will be N.A., and for reference only.
For flat bottom tank with structural roof,

Net_Uplift = Uplift due to design pressure less
Corroded weight of shell and corroded roof weight.
= P * PI / 4 * D ^ 2 * 144 «
- Corr. shell - [Corr. roof weight + Structural weight]
= 0 * 3,1416 / 4 * 9.113 * 144 «
- 183.523 - [79.241 + 0 + 0 + 0]
= -262.764 lbf
< Uplift Case per API-650 1.1.1 >
P_Uplift = 0 lbf
W_Roof_Plates (corroded) = 79.241 lbf
W_Roof_Structure = 0 lbf
W_Shell (corroded) = 183.523 lbf
Since P_Uplift <= W_Roof,
Tank Roof does not need to meet App. F requirements.
< API-650 App. F >
Fy = Min(Fy_roof,Fy_shell)
= Min(30.000,30.000)
= 30.000 psi
A_min_a = Min. Participating Area due to full Design Pressure.

(per API-650 F.5.1, and Fig. F-2)
(using API assumption internal P of 1/32 PSI)
= [OD^2(P - 8*t)]/[0,962*30.000*TAN(Theta)]
= [95,46^2(0,0313 - 8*0,271)]/[0,962*30.000*0,0625]
= -6,558 in^2
= 0 in^2 (since can't be negative)
P_F51 = Max. Design Pressure, reversing A_min_a calculation.

= A * [0,962*30.000*TAN(Theta)]/OD^2 + 8*t_h
= 7,399 * [0,962*30.000*0,0625]/95,46^2 + 8*0,271
= 0,131 PSI or 3,63 IN. H2O
P_Std = Max. Pressure allowed (Per API-650 App. F.1.3 & F.7)
= 2,5 PSI or 69,28 IN. H2O
PG 11::> P_max_internal = MIN(P_F51, P_Std)

= MIN(3,63, 69,28)
= 0,131 PSI or 3,63 IN. H2O
P_max_external = -999 PSI or -27685,91 IN. H2O
PG 12::>SHELL COURSE RE-RATING (Bottom Course is #1)
Course # 1; Material: Unknown Carbon Steel; Width = 6,5625ft
API-653 ONE FOOT METHOD
Sd = 23.595 PSI (allowable design stress per API-653 Table 4-1 and Note
2)
RE-RATE CONDITION
G = 0,88 (per API-653)
< Re-Rate Condition G = 0,88 >
H' = Effective liquid head at design pressure

= H + 2,31*P(psi)/G
= 20 + 2.31*0/0,88 = 20ft
t-Calc = 2,6*OD*(H' - 1)*G/(Sd*E) + CA (per API-653)

= 2,6*95,46*(20 - 1)*0,88/(23.595*1) + 0
= 0,1759 in.
hMax_1 = E*Sd*(t_1 - CA_1)/(2,6*OD*G) + 1

= 1*23.595*(0,719 - 0) / (2,6 * 95,46 * 0,88) + 1
= 78,6732 ft.
Pmax_1 = (hMax_1 - H) * 0,433 * G

= (78,6732 - 20) * 0,433 * 0,88
= 22,3569 PSI
Pmax_int_shell = Pmax_1
Pmax_int_shell = 22,3569 PSI
HYDROSTATIC TEST CONDITION
< Re-Rate Condition G = 1 >

= H + 2,31*P(psi)/G
= 20 + 2.31*0/1 = 20ft
t.test = 2,6*95,46*(20 - 1)/(26.000*1) = 0,1814 in.
2)
RE-RATE CONDITION
G = 0,88 (per API-653)

= H + 2,31*P(psi)/G
= 13,4375 + 2.31*0/0,88 = 13,44ft
PG 13::> t-Calc = 2,6*OD*(H' - 1)*G/(Sd*E) + CA (per API-653)

= 2,6*95,46*(13,44 - 1)*0,88/(23.595*1) + 0
= 0,1152 in.
hMax_2 = E*Sd*(t_2 - CA_2)/(2,6*OD*G) + 1

= 1*23.595*(0,633 - 0) / (2,6 * 95,46 * 0,88) + 1
= 69,3827 ft.
Pmax_2 = (hMax_2 - H) * 0,433 * G

= (69,3827 - 13,4375) * 0,433 * 0,88
= 21,3174 PSI
Pmax_int_shell = Min(Pmax_int_shell, Pmax_2)

= Min(22,3569, 21,3174)

= H + 2,31*P(psi)/G
= 13,4375 + 2.31*0/1 = 13,44ft
t.test = 2,6*95,46*(13,44 - 1)/(26.000*1) = 0,1188 in.
2)
RE-RATE CONDITION
G = 0,88 (per API-653)

= H + 2,31*P(psi)/G
= 6,875 + 2.31*0/0,88 = 6,88ft

= 2,6*95,46*(6,88 - 1)*0,88/(25.960*1) + 0
= 0,0495 in.
hMax_3 = E*Sd*(t_3 - CA_3)/(2,6*OD*G) + 1

= 1*25.960*(0,498 - 0) / (2,6 * 95,46 * 0,88) + 1
= 60,1911 ft.
Pmax_3 = (hMax_3 - H) * 0,433 * G

= (60,1911 - 6,875) * 0,433 * 0,88
= 20,3156 PSI

= Min(21,3174, 20,3156)
PG 14::> HYDROSTATIC TEST CONDITION

= H + 2,31*P(psi)/G
= 6,875 + 2.31*0/1 = 6,88ft
t.test = 2,6*95,46*(6,88 - 1)/(27.000*1) = 0,0541 in.
2)
RE-RATE CONDITION
G = 0,88 (per API-653)

= H + 2,31*P(psi)/G
= 0,3125 + 2.31*0/0,88 = 0,31ft
H' = 1, since H' - 1 cannot be negative

= 2,6*95,46*(1 - 1)*0,88/(25.960*1) + 0
= 0 in.
hMax_4 = E*Sd*(t_4 - CA_4)/(2,6*OD*G) + 1

= 1*25.960*(0,437 - 0) / (2,6 * 95,46 * 0,88) + 1
= 52,9408 ft.
Pmax_4 = (hMax_4 - H) * 0,433 * G

= (52,9408 - 0,3125) * 0,433 * 0,88
= 20,0535 PSI

= Min(20,3156, 20,0535)

= H + 2,31*P(psi)/G
= 0,3125 + 2.31*0/1 = 0,31ft
H' = 1, since H' - 1 cannot be negative
t.test = 2,6*95,46*(1 - 1)/(27.000*1) = 0 in.
Wtr = Transposed Width of each Shell Course

= Width*[ t_thinnest / t_course ]^2,5
PG 15::> Transforming Courses (1) to (4)
Wtr(1) = 6,5625*[ 0,437/0,719 ]^2.5 = 1,89 ft

Wtr(2) = 6,5625*[ 0,437/0,633 ]^2.5 = 2,5987 ft
Wtr(3) = 6,5625*[ 0,437/0,498 ]^2.5 = 4,7337 ft
Wtr(4) = 6,5625*[ 0,437/0,437 ]^2.5 = 6,5625 ft
Hts (Height of the Transformed Shell)
= SUM{Wtr} = 15,7849 ft
INTERMEDIATE WIND GIRDERS (API 650 Section 5.9.7)

V (Wind Speed) = 100 mph
Ve = vf = Velocity Factor = (vs/120)^2 = (100/120)^2 = 0,6944
Re-Rate PV = 0 PSI, OR 0 In. H2O
<TOP END STIFFENER CALCULATIONS>

Z = Required Top Comp Ring Section Modulus (per API-650 5.1.5.9.e)
= 0,91 in^3,
For Structural Roof and OD > 60 ft,

Minimum Required Angle is 3 x 3 x 3/8 in.
<INTERMEDIATE STIFFENER CALCULATIONS> (PER API-650 Section 5.9.7)
* * * NOTE: Using the thinnest shell course, t_thinnest,

instead of top shell course.
* * * NOTE: Not subtracting corrosion allowance per user setting.
ME = 28.799.999/28.799.999
= 1
Hu = Maximum Height of Unstiffened Shell

= {ME*600.000*t_thinnest*SQRT[t_thinnest/OD]^3} / Ve)
= {1*600.000*0,437*SQRT[0,437/95,46]^3} / 0,6944
= 116,946 ft
Wtr = Transposed Width of each Shell Course

= Width*[ t_thinnest / t_course ]^2,5
Transforming Courses (1) to (4)
Wtr(1) = 6,5625*[ 0,437/0,719 ]^2.5 = 1,89 ft

Wtr(2) = 6,5625*[ 0,437/0,633 ]^2.5 = 2,5987 ft
Wtr(3) = 6,5625*[ 0,437/0,498 ]^2.5 = 4,7337 ft
Wtr(4) = 6,5625*[ 0,437/0,437 ]^2.5 = 6,5625 ft
Hts (Height of the Transformed Shell)
= SUM{Wtr} = 15,7849 ft
L_0 = Hts/# of Stiffeners + 1

= 15,7849/1 = 15,78 ft.
No Intermediate Wind Girders Needed Since Hu >= L_0
SHELL COURSE #1 SUMMARY

-------------------------------------------
PG 16::> t-Calc = MAX(t-Calc_650, t_min_ext, t.seismic)

= MAX(0,1814, 0, 0)
= 0,1814 in.
Course Minimum t shall not be less than 0,1" + CA

(per API-653 Section 4.3.3.1)
t-653min = 0,1 in.

t.required = MAX(t.design, t.min653)
= MAX(0,1814,0,1) = 0,1814 in.
< API-653 4.3.2.1 >

t1 (lowest average thickness in the shell course)
t1 must be >= t.required = 0,1814 in.
t2 (least min. thickness in an area of shell course)
t2 must be >= 0,6*(t.required - CA) + CA = 0,108840 in.
Weight = Density*PI*[(12*OD) - t]*12*Width*t

= 0,2833*PI*[(12*95,46)-0,719]*12*6,5625*0,719
= 57.691 lbf (New)

-------------------------------------------
t-Calc = MAX(t-Calc_650, t_min_ext, t.seismic)

= MAX(0,1188, 0, 0)
= 0,1188 in.

t-653min = 0,1 in.

= MAX(0,1188,0,1) = 0,1188 in.
< API-653 4.3.2.1 >


= 0,2833*PI*[(12*95,46)-0,633]*12*6,5625*0,633
= 50.794 lbf (New)

-------------------------------------------

= MAX(0,0541, 0, 0)
= 0,0541 in.
PG 17::> Course Minimum t shall not be less than 0,1" + CA

t-653min = 0,1 in.

= MAX(0,0541,0,1) = 0,1 in.
< API-653 4.3.2.1 >


= 0,2833*PI*[(12*95,46)-0,498]*12*6,5625*0,498
= 39.966 lbf (New)

-------------------------------------------

= MAX(0, 0, 0)
= 0 in.

t-653min = 0,1 in.

= MAX(0,0,1) = 0,1 in.
< API-653 4.3.2.1 >


= 0,2833*PI*[(12*95,46)-0,437]*12*6,5625*0,437
= 35.072 lbf (New)
PG 18::>FLAT BOTTOM: ANNULAR PLATE DESIGN
Bottom Plate Material : Unknown Carbon Steel

Annular Bottom Plate Material : Unknown Carbon Steel
<Weight of Bottom Plate>
Bottom_Area = PI/4*(OD - 2*t_course_1 - 2*AnnRing_Width)^2

= PI/4*(1.146 - 2*0,719 - 2*24)^2
= 943.574 in^2
Annular_Area = PI/4*(Bottom_OD)^2 - Bottom_Area
= PI/4*(1.150)^2 - 943.574
= 94.248 in^2
Weight = Btm_Density * t.actual * Bottom_Area + Ann_Density * t-AnnRing *

«
Annular_Area)
= 0,2833 * 0,401*943.574 + 0,2833 * 0,759*94.248
= 127.459 lbf (New)
< API-653 >
Calculation of Hydrostatic Test Stress & Product Design Stress

(per API-653 Table 4-5 footnote b)
t_1 : Original Bottom (1st) Shell Course thickness.
H'= Max. Liq. Level + P(psi)/(0,433)

= 20 + (0)/(0,433) = 20 ft
St = Hydrostatic Test Stress in Bottom (1st) Shell Course

= (2,34)(OD)(H' - 1)/t_1
= (2,34)(95,46)(20 - 1)/(0,719)
= 5.903 PSI
Sd = Product Design Stress in Bottom (1st) Shell Course

= (2,34)(OD)(H' - 1)(G)/(t_1 - ca_1)
= (2,34)(95,46)(20 - 1)(0,88)/(0,719)
= 5.195 PSI
--------------------------
<Non-Annular Bottom Plates>
t_min = 0,1 + 0 = 0,1 in. (per API-653 Table 4-4)
t-Calc = t_min = 0,1 in.
t-Actual = 0,401 in.
<Annular Bottom Plates> (Per API-653 Section 4.4.8),
t_Min_Annular_Ring = 0,17 + 0 = 0,17 in. (per API-653 Table 4-5)
t_Annular_Ring = Actual Annular Ring Thickness

= 0,759 in.
PG 19::> W_Annular_Ring = Actual Annular Ring Width

= 24 in.
<Annular Bottom Plates> (per API-650 Section 5.5.2),

W_int = Minimum Annular Ring Width
(from Shell ID to Any Lap-Welded Joint)
(t_Min_Annular_Ring exclusive of corrosion)
= 390*t_Min_Annular_Ring/SQRT(H*G)
= 390(0,17)/SQRT(20*0,88)
= 15,8 in.
W_int = 24 in.
< FLAT BOTTOM: ANNULAR SUMMARY >
t.required = t-Calc = 0,1 in.

Annular Bottom Plate Material : Unknown Carbon Steel
Minimum Annular Ring Thickness = 0,17 in.
t_Annular_Ring = 0,759 in.
Minimum Annular Ring Width = 24 in.
W_Annular_Ring = 24 in.
PG 20::>SHELL SETTLEMENT EVALUATION (API-653 Appendix B.2.2)
Using Newton's Method with Taylor Series, the Optimum Cosine Curve
of the Data Points is,
Y = 0,395 + (0,2172)*COS(Theta + 3,23)
CHI^2 = 1,8153
R^2 = 0,9891
In the following table, Ui = out-of-plane settlement &

Si = out-of-plane deflection
Measurement Formula Ui Si
(in.) (in.) (in.) (in.)
----------------------------------------------------------------
1 0,19 0,18 0,0100 0,0100
2 0,25 0,23 0,0200 0,0150
3 0,34 0,35 -0,0100 -0,0200
4 0,48 0,48 0,0000 0,0050
5 0,56 0,58 -0,0200 -0,0200
6 0,62 0,61 0,0100 0,0200
7 0,58 0,56 0,0200 0,0150
8 0,43 0,44 -0,0100 -0,0200
9 0,32 0,31 0,0100 0,0150
10 0,18 0,21 -0,0300 -0,0400

Number of Shell Elevations Measurements Entered = 10
S = Maximum permissible out-of-plane deflection

= (L^2*Y*11)/[2*(E*H)]
= (29,9896^2*30.000*11)/[2*(28.799.999*26,25)]
= 0,1963 ft
= 2,3556 in.
Phi = Angle of Rigid Body Tilt

= 0,26 degrees
PG 21::>NET UPLIFT DUE TO INTERNAL PRESSURE

(See roof report for calculations)
Net_Uplift = -262.764 lbf
Anchorage NOT required for internal pressure.
WIND MOMENT (Per API-650 SECTION 5.11)
vs = Wind Velocity = 100 mph

vf = Velocity Factor = (vs/120)^2 = (100/120)^2 = 0,6944
Wind_Uplift = Iw * 30 * vf
= 1 * 30 * 0,6944
= 20,8333 lbf/ft^2
API-650 5.2.1.k Uplift Check

P_F41 = WCtoPSI(0,962*Fy*A*TAN(Theta)/D^2 + 8*t_h)
P_F41 = WCtoPSI(0,962*30.000*7,399*0,0625/95,46^2 + 8*0,271)
= 0,131 PSI
Limit Wind_Uplift/144+P to 1.6*P_F41
Wind_Uplift/144 + P = 0,1447 PSI
1.6*P_F41 = 0,2096 PSI
Wind_Uplift/144 + P = MIN(Wind_Uplift/144 + P, 1.6*P_F41)

Wind_Uplift/144 = MIN(Wind_Uplift/144, 1.6*P_F41 - P)
Wind_Uplift = MIN(Wind_Uplift, (1.6*P_F41 - P) * 144)
= MIN(20,8333,30,1824)
= 20,8333 lbf/ft^2
Ap_Vert = Vertical Projected Area of Roof

= pt*OD^2/48
= 0,75*95,46^2/48
= 142,385 ft^2
Horizontal Projected Area of Roof (Per API-650 5.2.1.f)
Xw = Moment Arm of UPLIFT wind force on roof

= 0.5*OD
= 0.5*95,46
= 47,73 ft
Ap = Projected Area of roof for wind moment
= PI*R^2
= PI*47,73^2
= 7.157 ft^2
M_roof (Moment Due to Wind Force on Roof)

= (Wind_Uplift)(Ap)(Xw)
= (20,8333)(7.157)(47,73) = 7.116.769 ft-lbf
Xs (Moment Arm of Wind Force on Shell)

= H/2 = (26,25)/2 = 13,125 ft
As (Projected Area of Shell)

= H*(OD + t_ins / 6)
= (26,25)(95,46 + 0/6) = 2.506 ft^2
M_shell (Moment Due to Wind Force on Shell)

= (Iw)(vf)(18)(As)(Xs)
= (1)(0,6944)(18)(2.506)(13,125) = 411.112 ft-lbf
PG 22::> Mw (Wind moment)

= M_roof + M_shell = 7.116.769 + 411.112
= 7.527.881 ft-lbf
W = Net weight (PER API-650 5.11.3)

(Force due to corroded weight of shell and
shell-supported roof plates less
40% of F.1.2 Uplift force.)
= W_shell + W_roof - 0,4*P*(PI/4)(144)(OD^2)

= 183.523 + 79.241 - 0*(PI/4)(144)(95,46^2)
= 262.764 lbf
RESISTANCE TO OVERTURNING (per API-650 5.11.2)
An unanchored Tank must meet these two criteria:

1) 0,6*Mw + MPi < (MDL + MF_min_liq)/1,5
2) Mw + 0,4MPi < (MDL + MF)/2
Mw = Destabilizing Wind Moment = 7.527.881 ft-lbf
MPi = Destabilizing Moment about the Shell-to-Bottom Joint from Design «
Pressure.
= P*(PI*OD^2/4)*(144)*(OD/2)
= 0*(3,1416*95,46^2/4)*(144)*(47,73)
= 0 ft-lbf
MDL = Stabilizing Moment about the Shell-to-Bottom Joint from the Shell
and «
Roof weight supported by the
Shell.
= (W_shell + W_roof)*OD/2
= (183.523 + 79.241)*47,73
= 12.541.726 ft-lbf
tb = Annular Bottom Ring thickness less C.A. = 0,759 in.

Lb = Minimum bottom annular ring width
Lb = greater of 18 in. or 0,365*tb*SQRT(Sy_btm/H_liq)

= 18 in.
wl = Circumferential loading of contents along Shell-To-Bottom Joint.

= 4,67*tb*SQRT(Sy_btm*H_liq)
= 4,67*0,759*SQRT(30.000*20)
= 2.746 lbf/ft
wl = 0.9 * H_liq * OD (lesser value than above)

= 0,9*20*95,46
= 1.718 lbf/ft
wl_min_liq = Circumferential loading of Minimum-Level contents along «

Shell-To-Bottom
Joint.
= 4,67*ta*SQRT(Sy_btm*H_min_liq)
= 4,67*0,759*SQRT(30.000*0)
= 0 lbf/ft
MF_min_liq = wa_min_liq*PI*OD
= 0*3,1416*95,46
= 0 lbf
PG 23::> MF = Stabilizing Moment due to Bottom Plate and Liquid Weight.

= (OD/2)*wl*PI*OD
= (47,73)(1.718)(3,1416)(95,46)
= 24.595.558 ft-lbf
Criteria 1
0,6*(7.527.881) + 0 < (12.541.726 + 0)/1,5
Since 4.516.729 < 8.361.151, Tank is stable.
Criteria 2
7.527.881 + 0,4 * 0 < (12.541.726 + 24.595.558)/2
Since 7.527.881 < 18.568.640, Tank is stable.
RESISTANCE TO SLIDING (per API-650 5.11.4)
F_wind = vF * 18 * As
= 0,6944 * 18 * 2.506
= 31.323 lbf
F_friction = Maximum of 40% of Weight of Tank

= 0,4 * (W_Roof_Corroded + W_Shell_Corroded +
W_Btm_Corroded + RoofStruct + W_min_Liquid)
= 0,4 * (79.241 + 183.523 + 127.459 + 0 + 0)
= 156.089 lbf
No anchorage needed to resist sliding since
F_friction > F_wind
<Anchorage Requirement>
Anchorage NOT required since Criteria 1, Criteria 2, and Sliding
ARE acceptable.
ANCHOR BOLT CHAIRS NOT SPECIFIED.
PG 24::>CAPACITIES and WEIGHTS
Maximum Capacity (to upper TL) : 1.402.575 gal

Design Capacity (to Max Liquid Level) : 1.068.079 gal
Minimum Capacity (to Min Liquid Level) : 0 gal
NetWorking Capacity (Design - Min.) : 1.068.079 gal
New Condition Corroded

-----------------------------------------------------------
Shell 183.523 lbf 183.523 lbf
Roof
Plates 79.241 lbf 79.241 lbf
Rafters 0 lbf 0 lbf
Girders 0 lbf 0 lbf
Columns 0 lbf 0 lbf
Bottom 127.459 lbf 127.459 lbf
Stiffeners 0 lbf 0 lbf
Nozzle Wgt 0 lbf 0 lbf
Misc Roof Wgt 0 lbf 0 lbf
Misc Shell Wgt 0 lbf 0 lbf
Insulation 0 lbf 0 lbf
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total 390.223 lbf 390.223 lbf
Weight of Tank, Empty : 390.223 lbf

Weight of Tank, Full of Product (SG=0,88): 10.690.666 lbf
Weight of Tank, Full of Water : 12.095.272 lbf
Net Working Weight, Full of Product : 8.234.144 lbf
Net Working Weight, Full of Water : 9.303.769 lbf
Foundation Area Req'd : 7.157 ft^2
Foundation Loading, Empty : 54,52 lbf/ft^2

Foundation Loading, Full of Product (SG=0,88) : 1.494 lbf/ft^2
Foundation Loading, Full of Water : 1.690 lbf/ft^2
SURFACE AREAS
Roof 7.171 ft^2
Shell 7.872 ft^2
Bottom 7.157 ft^2
Wind Moment 7.527.881 ft-lbf

Seismic Moment 0 ft-lbf
MISCELLANEOUS ATTACHED ROOF ITEMS
MISCELLANEOUS ATTACHED SHELL ITEMS

PG 25::>MAWP & MAWV SUMMARY FOR 201939 - T-01
MAXIMUM CALCULATED INTERNAL PRESSURE
MAWP = 2,5 PSI or 69,28 IN. H2O (per API-650 App. F.1.3 & F.7)
MAWP = Maximum Calculated Internal Pressure (due to shell)

= 2,5 PSI or 69,28 IN. H2O
MAWP = Maximum Calculated Internal Pressure (due to roof)

= 0,131 PSI or 3,63 IN. H2O
TANK MAWP = 0,131 PSI or 3,63 IN. H2O
MAXIMUM CALCULATED EXTERNAL PRESSURE
MAWV = -1 PSI or -27,71 IN. H2O (per API-650 V.1)
MAWV = Maximum Calculated External Pressure (due to shell)

= -0,343 PSI or -9,51 IN. H2O
MAWV = Maximum Calculated External Pressure (due to roof)

= -999 PSI or -27.686 IN. H2O
MAWV = N.A. (not calculated due to columns)
TANK MAWV = -0,343 PSI or -9,51 IN. H2O

APPENDIX B - NDE REPORT

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
APPENDIX C - PLUMBNESS AND SETTLEMENT REPORT

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
APPENDIX D – RISK ASSESSMENT

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
Risk Date (2019) Risk Plan Date (2024) Inspection
Number of
TOTAL TOTAL Number of Effectiveness of Effectiveness of the
Component Inspections
Equipment Name Component Area Based Probability Total DF Component Area Based Risk Probability Total DF Inspections the Inspections Inspections Needed
Type GFFT POF COF Risk Category GFFT POF COF Risk Category Target Date Needed for
Consequence Risk (m2) Of Failure (RBI Date) Consequence (m2) Of Failure (Plan Date) Needed for Needed for for External
External Corrosion-
Area (m2) 2
Area (m ) Thinning Thinning Corrosion-Ferritic
Ferritic
COURSE-1 573,1998 0,0482 8,4013E-05 0,0001001 2,9518 2 C Medium (2C) 573,1998 3,9064 0,00068 0,0001001 53,7748 3 C Medium (3C) 14/01/2024 1 A 1 A
COURSE-2 573,1998 0,1548 0,0003 0,0001001 4,0849 2 C Medium (2C) 573,1998 8,42 0,00147 0,0001001 141,7615 3 C Medium (3C) 14/01/2024 1 A 1 A
T-01 5000KL
T-02 1000KL
Left Head 82,6044 0,0125 3,9739E-05 0,0000306 0,1 2 B Low (2B) 82,6044 0,0125 0,00109 0,0000306 320,2945 3 B Low (3B) 14/01/2024 1 B 1 B
T-03 850KL Right Head 82,6044 0,0125 3,8231E-05 0,0000306 0,1 2 B Low (2B) 82,6044 0,0125 0,0004 0,0000306 153,9926 3 B Low (3B) 14/01/2024 1 B 1 B
Shell 82,6044 0,0125 0,00010311 0,0000306 0,1 2 B Low (2B) 82,6044 0,0125 0,00050452 0,0000306 153,9926 3 B Low (3B) 14/01/2024 1 B 1 B
COURSE-1 42,6044 0,0025 5,7841E-05 0,0001001 0,4182 2 B Low (2B) 42,6044 9,6837 0,00057841 0,0001001 4551,1236 3 B Low (3B) 14/01/2024 1 B 1 B
T-04 110KL
APPENDIX E - REMAINING LIFE ASSESSMENT

Telp.: +62 21 531 50 601 Fax.: +62 21 531 50 601
ATMOSPHERIC STORAGE TANK BOTTOM CORROSION
GENERAL DATA
Location : Futong, Pelalawan
Operation : Storage Tank
Tag no. : T-01
Code : API STANDARD 650
Diameter (mm) : 29.095
Tank height (mm) : 8.000
Max Filling Height (mm) : 7.800
Material : SA285 Grade C
Year built : 2019
Capacity (KL) : 5.000
Service : Diesel Fuel
CORROSION RATE DETERMINATION
Service Product Product-Side Corrosion
Soil-Side Corrosion
A. Soil-Side Corrosion Rate (API 581 Sec. 2.B.14.3.1)

Factor Condition Value Unit
Silt Soil Type (Moderate-Industrial Areas, Mixed Particle

Soil Side Base Corrosion Rate (CRSB) 0,13 mm/year
Size, Variable Moisture Level)
Soil Resistivity (FSR) Mildly Corrosive (2000 - 10000 Ω-cm) 0,83 -

Pad Material (FPA) Continuous Concrete 1-
Drainage (FTD) Storm Water Does Not Collect At AST Base 1-
Cathodic Protection (FCP) None 1-
Bottom Type (FTB) Single Bottom 1-
Soil Temperature (FST) Temp ≤ 75 °F (24 °C) 1-
Soil-Side Corrosion Rate (CRS) 0,108 mm/year
B. Product-Side Corrosion Rate (API 581 Sec. 2.B.14.3.2)

Product Side base Corrosion Rate (CRPB) Estimate Corrosion Rate 0,05 mm/year
Product Condition (FPC) Dry 1-
Product Temperature (FPT) Temp ≤ 75 °F (24 °C) 1-
Product Steam Coil (FSC) No 1-
Water Draw-off (FWD) No 1-
Product-Side Corrosion Rate (CRP) 0,050 mm/year
C. Combine Corrosion Rate (API 581 Sec. 2.B.14.3.3)

Option 1 General Corrosion 0,158 mm/year
Option 2 Pitting and Localized Corrosion 0,108 mm/year
REMAINING LIFE CALCULATION FOR ATMOSPHERIC STORAGE TANK
GENERAL DATA
Location : Futong, Pelalawan
Operation : Storage Tank
Tag no. : T-01
Code : API STANDARD 650
Diameter - D (mm) : 29.095 95,45575
Tank height - H (mm) : 8.000 26,24664
Max Filling Height (mm) : 7.800 307,32
Material : SA285 Grade C
Year built : 2019
Capacity (KL) : 5.000
Service : Diesel Fuel
Total Shell Course : 4
Specific Gravity - G : 0,88
Max. Allowable Yield Strenght- Y (psi) : 30000 24000 26400
Max. Allowable Tensile Strenght - T (psi) : 50000 21450 23600
Joint Efficiency - E : 1
CALCULATION
Thickness Minimum by Calculation (API 653)
Long Term Corrosion Rate (LT)
Short Term Corrosion Rate (ST) Roof
31,52 800 Shell - 4

Soil-Side Corrosion Rate
(API 581 Sec. 2.B.14.1)
94,56 2400 Shell - 3
Product-Side Corrosion Rate Bottom

94,56 2400 Shell - 2
(API 581 Sec. 2.B.14.2)
Annular/ Projection Plate
94,56 2400 Shell - 1
Remaining Life
RESULT
Thickness (mm) Year Corrosion Rate (mm/year)

4 Remaining Life
Soil-Side Product- Combination
Component Minimum by Minimum by Previous Last Long Term Short Term
Initial Previous Required Built 2 2 Pitting and (Year)3
Actual Calculation Inspection Inspection (LT) (ST) (CRS) Side (CRP) General
Localized
Roof 8 - 6,88 - 4,65 2012 - 2019 0,160 - - 0,050 - 0,050 13
Shell 1 18 - 18,25 2,83 4,61 2012 - 2019 - - 0,108 0,050 0,158 0,108 86
Shell 2 18 - 16,08 2,16 3,02 2012 - 2019 0,274 - 0,108 0,050 0,158 0,108 47
Shell 3 14 - 12,64 1,08 2,54 2012 - 2019 0,194 - 0,108 0,050 0,158 0,108 51
Shell 4 12 - 11,1 0,21 2,54 2012 - 2019 0,129 - 0,108 0,050 0,158 0,108 54
Bottom 10 - 10,19 0,26 2,54 2012 - 2020 - - 0,108 0,050 0,158 0,108 48
Annular 10 - 19,27 17,69 4,32 2012 - 2019 - - 0,108 0,050 0,158 0,108 94
SUMMARY
Minimum Thickness : 6,88 mm Located at Roof

Maximum Corrosion Rate : 0,274 mm/year
Remaining Life : 13 Year
NOTE
1. S is the maximum allowable stress (psi); use the smaller of 0.80Y or 0.429T for bottom and second course; use the smaller of 0.88Y or 0.472T for all other courses. (API 653)
2. Soil-Side and Product-Side Corrosion Rate determination based on API 581.
3. Maximum corrosion rate between Long Term, Short Term, Soil-Side and Product-Side are using to calculate Remaining Life
4. Combination of Soil-Side (External Corrosion) and Product-Side Corrosion Rate (Internal Corrosion) determination based on API 581.
5. Detailed Thickness Measurement can be seen at APPENDIX B

DTP-201939-R001 Reva PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DTP-201939-R001 Reva PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REMAINING LIFE ASSESSMENT

Equipment : Storage Tank 5000 KL

PT DINAMIKA TEKNIK PERSADA

Equipment : Storage Tank 5000 KL

A 05 Sept 2019 Draft Report EY IS

Document No. : DTP/201939/R001

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

SUMMARY OF CHANGE SHEET

Rev No Date Page Description Approve

A 05 Sept 2019 All Draft Report

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

Figure 4.1 Plumbness Tollerance ...................................................................................................... 12

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

Engineering and Riks Assessment Engineering and Risk Assessment

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

Tabel 3.1 General Data of Storage Tank

Owner PT. PEC Tech Service Indonesia

Asumsi Data Data Assumtions

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

4.1 External Inspection

Fondation and supports Fondation and supports

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

• Memeriksa kondisi insulasi disekitar pintu • Inspect condition of insulation around

Peralatan Keselamatan Safety Equipment

Grounding Connection Grounding Connection

Protective Coating or insulation Protective Coating or insulation

Auxiliary Equipment Auxiliary Equipment

4.2 Non Destructive Examination

4.2.1 UT Thickness Measurement

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

4.2.2 Plumbness and Roundness Measurement

Figure 4.1 Plumbness Tollerance

4.2.3 Settlement Measurement

Hasil pengukuran settlement ditunjukkan dalam Settlement measurements results were

Figure 4.2 Tank Settlement Measurement Point

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

4.2.4 Hardness Test

4.2.5 Magnetic Particle Inspection

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

Figure 5.1 Flowchart of Atmospheric Storage Tank

5.1 Acceptence Criteria

Atap Tangki Tank Roof

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

Dinding Tangki Tank Shell

Dasar Tangki Tank Bottom

Projection Plate Projection Plate

Kemiringan dan Kebulatan Plumbness and Roundness

5.2 Damage Mechanism

PT. Dinamika Teknik Persada

Table 5.1 ASME PCC 3 – Damage Mechanisms Screening Table

Cyclic Stress (e.g., Vibratory)

Ni-Based Alloys (>50% Ni)

400 Series Stainless Steel

Duplex Stainless Steel

Static Stress (Note 1)

Brittle Fracture Cracking X X X X X X X X X X No

Carbon dioxide corrosion Metal loss X X X X X X X No

Corrosion under Insulation (Note 2) Metal loss X X X X X X X X X No

Creep and Stress Rupture Cracking X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X No

5.3 Engineering Calculation