Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hazard Identification & Hierarchy of Hazard Controls
Hazard Identification & Hierarchy of Hazard Controls
Dasmariñas, Cavite
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY
ENGINEERING
As a learning student, you are now aware of the various control measures that protect you
against health and safety hazards in your surroundings. You have the right to participate in
workplace health and safety issues and to know about any potential hazards and provide control
measures by applying the Heirarchy of Controls, e.g., Elimination, Substitution, Engineering
Control, Administrative Control, and Personal Protective Equipment.
Workplace hazards can be physical (i.e. constant loud noise), biological (i.e. bacteria and
viruses), ergonomic (i.e. improperly adjusted workstations and chairs) or chemical (i.e. exposure
to fumes).
The words ‘risk’ and ‘hazard’ are often used interchangeably. However, if
you are responsible for managing the health and safety in your workplace,
it’s important that you understand the difference between them. The rest of
this article focuses on hazards, including where they might be found in
different workplaces. We also provide you with a range of further resources
to make your risk assessment process as smooth as possible.
Elimination
Can the hazard be removed completely? This is the most effective method of controlling a
hazard, or eliminating the risk from that hazard e.g. provide an external cleaning system to
eliminate the need to enter a hazardous confined space to clean it. Example: a) A worker used
to clean the interior of an empty tank with a hand steel brush endangering his life because of
the lack of oxygen so he attached a wooden stick to the brush and perform the cleaning without
entering the tank, and b) A construction welder used Tank trolley to move Oxy-Acythelene tanks
instead of rolling it down the floor.
Substitution
Is there a safer alternative? E.g. replacing a solvent known to be hazardous, with one known to
be less hazardous (and still do the job effectively).
The above methods reduce the actual risk (and/or the likelihood) from the hazard. The following
controls do not reduce the risk, but lower the exposure of a person or persons to the hazard,
making the above control types much more effective. Example: a) Instead of using a thinner to
mixed with wall paint, use a water-based non-toxic paint to prevent the respiratory illness, and
b) replaced non-slid tiles to ordinary marble or vynil floor tiles.
Engineering Control
Examples include the installation of machine guards on hazardous equipment, the provision of
local exhaust ventilation over a process area releasing noxious fumes, fitting a muffler on a
noisy exhaust pipe, etc. Most engineering controls provide a physical distance between a
hazard and people - provides separation. Example: a) Putting up a hand rail at the stairs to
prevent slip and fall, and b) Putting up a steel pipe barriers for street manhole to prevent fall.
Administrative Control
Include training and education, job rotation to share the load created by demanding tasks,
planning, scheduling certain jobs outside normal working hours to reduce general exposure (eg
planning demolition and building works during summer recess), early reporting of signs and
symptoms, instructions sign (cautions, warnings), etc. For continuing levels of effectiveness it
typically require significant resources to be maintained over long periods of time . Example: a)
Training to enhance or develop awareness of a safe work practices, and b) Warning signs for
any imminent danger; repair and maintenance of uneven / damage structures;
Can equipment (i.e., personal protective equipment - PPE) be provided to a person or persons
to lessen the severity or likelihood of an injury? E.g. helmets - hard hats, hearing protection,
gloves, safety glasses and goggles, toe-capped footwear, respiratory protection, aprons, etc.
Note: Personal Protective Equipment on its own is the least effective means of controlling
hazards and must only be considered after all other more effective measures have been
assessed and dismissed as being impracticable (ineffective).
INSTRUCTIONS:
The following pages contain images of various workplaces. You have the following tasks:
a) Study the lessons on hazard identification and hierarchy of hazard controls
b) Find all the potential hazards in the workplace picture 1, 2, and 3.
c) Make a list on a separate page as shown by the sample matrices below;
Workplace 1: KITCHEN
ITEM # ACTIVITY POTENTIAL HIERARCHY OF HAZARD CONTROLS
HAZARD Elimination Substitution Engineering Administrative PPE
1 Use of Open cover N/A N/A N/A Warning N/A
oven – skin burn sign
Notes:
Activity – specific work or task where the hazards pertains to. Ex. Use of shelf, use of
machine, office works…
Potential Hazard – those visible or imaginary that has the potential to induce harm or
injury to a person/s.
c) You can also copy and make a textbox to the picture where you see a hazard and type the
hazard into the box.
B) The more potential hazards you identified, the more points who can have.
WORKPLACE 1 : KITCHEN
2
Since you have identified the potential hazards and learned about the application of hierarchy of
hazard controls, find out on each picture the common potential hazards and develop procedures
on how to prevent such hazards. For example:
1. Spillage :
Procedures:
1.1 Before using the oil fryer, wear the required PPE’s such as the Safety kitchen gloves.
1.2 Start off the fire and pour cooking oil as per required quantity on the fryer.
1.3 Place the required quantity of cut potato chunks on the grilles.
1.4 Upon reaching the required oil temperature, place the grilles on the fryer.
1.5 When the allowed cooking time elapsed, pull out the grilles and placed it on the
dripping hook device.
1.6 Allow oil to drip in few seconds and the pour the cooked French fried potatoes on the
dry pan nearby. Ensure that no hot oil is spilled out.
Worksheet:
EMERGENCY SCENARIOS
Questions
1. What went right in this situation? When the co-worker immediately responded,
called the City Fire Department and told the people to leave immediately.
2. What went wrong in this situation? The frying pan left unattended and the
employee attempting to put out the fire.
3. What steps should be taken in his workplace to make sure employees are better
protected and prepared the next time? The employees should have proper training
and knowledge about facing these circumstances. They should know what’s
the first thing to do, what’s the most important things to do, etc. Also, the
workplace should have warning signs and alarm systems.
An 28-year-old Communication technician, who was installing a axial cable in the second story
of a house, fell off his ladder yesterday, breaking both legs. He also suffered severe cuts when
he caught his arm on a metal fence during the fall. Co-workers rushed to assist him and called
for an ambulance. Local EMTs reported that the co-workers carried the fallen employee to the
front lawn and then applied pressure to the open wound to stop the bleeding.
Questions
1. What went right in this situation? The co-worker calling for an ambulance and
doing first-aid.
2. What went wrong in this situation? The co-workers should have not carried the
fallen employee to avoid addition injuries. The technician should have worn a
harness and proper clothes.
3. What steps should be taken in his workplace to make sure employees are better
protected and prepared the next time? The company should have provided PPEs
including protective clothes, harness, hard hats. Also, additional trainings for
their workers.
Office workers at R&R Business Solutions huddled under desks and doorways as a 6.1
earthquake shook their building. Once the tremors subsided, they followed lighted exit
signs to the stairwell. They made it down ten flights of stairs and outside to the street.
Gladys Radios, of Green Terrace Housing, whose son, Junio, is an employee of the
company, complained that her son, who has Down Syndrome, was left alone to figure out
what to do during and after the earthquake. The employees and supervisors had no idea
Junio had remained on the 11th floor. The company pledges to look what happen.
Question
1. What went right in this situation? The office workers knowing what they should do
during and after earthquake such as huddling under desks, following lighted exit
signs to the stairwell.
2. What went wrong in this situation? Not checking if they are complete.
3. What steps should be taken in his workplace to make sure employees are better
protected and prepared the next time? The company should provide strict
trainings to all of their employees about these given circumstances.