Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NB02005
NB02005
NB02005
RESULTS REFERENCES
1. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls
Analysis of baseline cross-sectional data
among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J
Of the 3,654 individuals in the baseline study, 3,299 (90.3 Med 1988; 319: 1701–1707.
per cent) answered the questions about falls. Of those aged 2. Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF. Risk factors for falls in
65 years and over, 29.6 per cent reported one or more a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and
falls. Tests of visual function that had a statistically older. J Gerontol 1989; 44: M112–7.
significant association with two or more falls after 3. O’Loughlin JL, Robitaille Y, Boivin JF, Suissa S. Incidence
adjustment for confounders were visual acuity (prevalence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the
ratio (PR) 1.9 for visual acuity worse than 20/30), contrast community-dwelling elderly. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137: 342–
sensitivity (PR 1.2 for a one unit decrease at six cycles per 354.
degree) and visual field screening (PR 1.5 for five or more 4. Sattin RW. Falls among older persons: a public health
perspective. Annu Rev Public Health 1992; 13: 489–508.
points missing).33 The presence of posterior subcapsular
5. Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Kidd S, Black D. Risk factors for
cataract (PR 2.1), and use of non-miotic glaucoma
recurrent nonsyncopal falls. A prospective study. JAMA 1989;
medication (PR 2.0) had a statistically significant 261: 2663–2668.
association with two or more falls, while presence of age- 6. Wolinsky FD, Fitzgerald JF, Stump TE. The effect of hip
related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a
cortical or nuclear cataract did not.33 prospective study. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 398–403.
7. Kiel DP, O’Sullivan P, Teno JM, Mor V. Health care utilization
Analysis of longitudinal data
and functional status in the aged following a fall. Med Care
Analyses were carried out after both two and five years of 1991; 29: 221–228.
follow-up. We believed that stronger associations for the 8. Dunn JE, Rudberg MA, Furner SE, Cassel CK. Mortality,
shorter period were to be expected because the level of disability, and falls in older persons: the role of underlying
visual impairment present at the time of a hip fracture disease and disability. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 395–
would be much better reflected by a recent eye 400.
examination than an eye examination performed many 9. Tinetti ME, Liu WL, Claus EB. Predictors and prognosis of
years in the past. There were 59 subjects who had sustained inability to get up after falls among elderly persons. JAMA
a fracture of the hip after five years of follow-up, and 17 1993; 269: 65–70.
subjects sustained a hip fracture after two years of follow- 10. Kosorok MR, Omenn GS, Diehr P, Koepsell TD, Patrick
up. As expected, visual impairment of any type did not DL. Restricted activity days among older adults. Am J Public
Health 1992; 82: 1263–1267.
predict risk of hip fracture during five-year follow-up.
11. Sernbo I, Johnell O. Consequences of a hip fracture: a
Risk factors that were predictive of hip fracture after two prospective study over one year. Osteoporos Int 1993; 3:
years of follow-up were: 148–53.
12. Salkeld G, Cameron ID, Cumming RG, et al. Quality of life
• corrected visual acuity (that is, the best visual acuity related to fear of falling and hip fracture in older women: a
attained after refraction); time trade off study. BMJ 2000; 320: 341–6.
• visual field deficits; 13. March L, Chamberlain A, Cameron I, et al. Prevention,
• presence of posterior subcapsular cataract (data as yet treatment and rehabilitation of fractured neck of femur. Report
unpublished). from the Northern Sydney Area Health Service Fractured
Neck of Femur Health Outcomes Project. Sydney: Northern
No other eye disease was predictive of hip fracture, Sydney Area Health Service, 1996; www.mja.com.au/public/
probably because of the small numbers involved. issues/iprs2/march/fnof.pdf>).