See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/323028874

Hazardous Waste Management in India - A Review

Research · February 2018

CITATION READS
1 10,950

3 authors, including:

Kuruva Syamala Devi Sujana Oggu

G. Narayanamma Institute of Technology and Science 1 PUBLICATION   1 CITATION   
13 PUBLICATIONS   15 CITATIONS   
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Hazardous Waste Management in India - A Review View project

Environmental Accounting/Green Accounting View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Kuruva Syamala Devi on 09 February 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

Hazardous Waste Management in India – A Review

Dr. K. Syamala Devi, O. Sujana and Dr. T. Charan Singh
1Asst. Prof, 2 Asst. Prof,, 3 Sr. Asst. Prof,
1
Department of Basic Sciences,
1
G.Narayanamma Institute of Technology & Science(for Women), Hyderabad, India

Abstract : Hazardous waste is the waste that poses substantial or potential threats to public health and the environment. The
sources of hazardous waste are basically agricultural and agro industries, medical facilities, commercial centers, household and the
informal sectors. Rapidly growing industries in the country have contributed in the production of large part of hazardous waste
material. Therefore, to reduce environmental hazardous, proper attention is required during storage, segregation, transportation and
disposal of waste, because it cannot be disposed of by common means like other by products of our daily lives. Hazardous waste
management is an important issue in our country now days. Unscientific disposal of hazardous waste and only few secured landfill
sites available in the country for disposal of hazardous waste in an environmentally sound manner posed serious risk to the
environment system. Rapid industrialization in last few decades have led to the depletion of natural resources and increase in
pollution in the country. In India though there are certain rules and regulation cited by the central government for reduction of
hazardous waste and for the minimization of hazardous effect on the environment still hazardous wastes are stored, transported,
disposed or managed unsystematically causing health and environmental (air, water, soil) related problems. This paper is a review
report about the hazardous waste management in India.
IndexTerms - Hazardous Waste, Waste Minimization, 3R’s, TSDF

I. INTRODUCTION
India is a developing country, and industries is a major source of hazardous waste in developing countries, but industrial
hazardous waste sources presents greater risks in developing countries than in developed countries because of poor management and
obsolete technologies, multinational companies often set their plants in developing countries so, that they can use technologies banned
in their house country. The accident at the Bhopal plant in India, which belonged to union carbide of USA is a prime example of this
situation (Khan Danielle J). The major source of hazardous solid wastes in our country are industrial activities, agriculture and argo-
industries, medical facilities, commercial centres, household and the informal sector. Small competitive and labour intensive
businesses that are not regulated by government is the source of hazardous solid waste that is currently recognized as major problem
in developing countries.
Hazardous waste in India has been defined as “any substance, excluding domestic and radioactive wastes, which because of
its quantity and/or corrosive, reactive, ignitable, toxic and infectious characteristics causes significant hazards to human health or
environment when improperly treated, stored, transported and disposed”. Hazardous wastes refer to wastes that may, or tend to, cause
adverse health effects on the ecosystem and human beings. These wastes pose present or potential risks to human health or living
organisms, due to the fact that they: are non-degradable or persistent in nature; can be biologically magnified; are highly toxic and
even lethal at very low concentrations. To determine the nature of hazard, the criteria that would be followed is toxicity, phyto
toxicity, genetic activity and bio-concentration of the substance.

II. CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES:

Hazardous Wastes are Classified as F, K, P, and U lists

F-List: The F-list contains hazardous wastes from non-specific sources, that is various industrial processes that may have
generated the waste. The list consists of solvents commonly used in degreasing, metal treatment baths and sludges, wastewaters from
metal plating operations and dioxin containing chemicals or their precursors. Examples: Benzene (F005), Carbon tetrachloride (F001),
Cresylic acid (F004) etc.

K-list: The K-list contains hazardous wastes generated by specific industrial processes. Examples of industries, which
generate K-listed wastes include wood preservation, pigment production, chemical production, petroleum refining, iron and steel
production, explosive manufacturing and pesticide production.

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1547

 www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

P and U lists: The P and U lists contain discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification chemicals, container
residues and residues from the spillage of materials. These two lists include commercial pure grades of the chemical, any technical
grades of the chemical that are produced or marketed, and all formulations in which the chemical is the sole active ingredient. An
example of a P or U listed hazardous waste is a pesticide, which is not used during its shelf-life and requires to be disposed in bulk.
Characteristics:
a) Ignitability:
A waste is an ignitable hazardous waste, if it has a flash point of less than 60C; readily catches fire and burns so vigorously
as to create a hazard; or is an ignitable compressed gas or an oxidizer. Ex: Naphtha, lacquer thinner, epoxy resins, adhesives, oil based
paints etc.
b) Corrosivity:
A liquid waste which has a pH of less than or equal to 2 or greater than or equal to 12.5 is considered to be a corrosive
hazardous waste. Sodium hydroxide, a caustic solution with a high pH, is often used by many industries to clean or degrease metal
parts. Hydrochloric acid, a solution with a low pH, is used by many industries to clean metal parts prior to painting. When these
caustic or acid solutions are disposed of, the waste is a corrosive hazardous waste.
c) Reactvity:

A material is considered a reactive hazardous waste, if it is unstable, reacts violently with water, generates toxic gases when
exposed to water or corrosive materials, or if it is capable of detonation or explosion when exposed to heat or a flame. Examples of
reactive wastes would be waste gunpowder, sodium metal or wastes containing cyanides or sulphides.

d) Toxicity:

To determine if a waste is a toxic hazardous waste, a representative sample of the material must be subjected to a test
conducted in a certified laboratory. The toxic characteristic identifies wastes that are likely to leach dangerous concentrations of toxic
chemicals into ground water.

Hazardous Waste can be classified into - (i) Solid wastes (ii) Liquid wastes (iii) Gaseous wastes (iv) Sludge wastes from
various anthropogenic sources (Babu and Gupta, 1997). Any product that releases hazardous substance at the end of its life, if
indiscriminately disposed of is known as hazardous waste. An efficient Hazardous Waste Management protocol needs to be executed;
other-wise it may cause land, surface and ground water pollution (Ramakrishna and Babu,1999a; Rao, 1999, Wentz,1995; Parsa et al.
1996; Chakradhar et al., 1999).

Characteristics of Hazardous Wastes

Fig:1 Characteristics of Hazardous Wastes

Hazardous Characteristics
Flammable/ Explosive This type of waste may cause damage to the surroundings by Producing
harmful gases at high temperature and pressure or by causing fire hazards.
Oxidizng Types of wastes that may yield oxygen and thereby cause or contribute to
the combustion of other materials.
Poisonous (Acute) These waste have high potential to cause death, serious injury or to harm
health if swallowed, inhaled or by skin contact.
Infectious Substances Hazardous wastes containing micro-organisms and their toxins, and
responsible for diseases in animals or humans.
Corrosives These wastes are chemically active and may cause severe damage to the
flora and fauna, or to the other materials by direct contact with them.
Eco-toxic These wastes may present immediate or delayed adverse impacts to the
environment by means of bioaccumulation and/or toxic effects upon biotic
systems.
Toxic (Delayed or Chronic) These wastes, if inhaled or ingested or if they penetrate the skin, may cause
delayed or chronic effects, including carcinogenicity.
Organic Peroxides These are organic waste containing bivalent-O-O- structure and may
undergo exothermic self-accelerating decomposition

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1548

 www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

Classification: Hazardous wastes are generally classified into five categories.

a) Radioactive Substance:
Substances that emit ionising radiation are radioactive. Such substances are hazardous because prolonged exposure to
radiation often results in damage to living organisms. Radioactive substances are of special concern because they persist for a long
period. The period in which radiation occurs is commonly measured and expressed as half-life, i.e., the time required for the
radioactivity of a given amount of the substance to decay to half its initial value. For example, uranium compounds have half-lives
that range from 72 years for U232 to 23,420,000 years for U236.
b) Chemicals:
Most hazardous chemical wastes can be classified into five groups: synthetic organics, inorganic metals, salts, acids and
bases, and flammables and explosives. Some of the chemicals are hazardous because they are highly toxic to most life forms.
c) Bio-medical Wastes:
The principal sources of hazardous biological wastes are hospitals and biological research facilities. The ability to infect
other living organisms and the ability to produce toxins are the most significant characteristics of hazardous biological wastes. This
group mainly includes malignant tissues discarded during surgical procedures and contaminated materials, such as hypodermic
needles, bandages and outdated drugs.
d) Flammable wastes:
Most flammable wastes are identified as hazardous chemical wastes. This dual grouping is necessary because of the high
potential hazard in storing, collecting and disposing of flammable wastes. These wastes may be liquid, gaseous or solid, but most
often they are liquids. Typical examples include organic solvents, oils, plasticisers and organic sludges.
e) Explosives:
Explosive hazardous wastes are mainly ordnance (artillery) materials, i.e., the wastes resulting from ordnance manufacturing
and some industrial gases. Similar to flammables, these wastes also have a high potential for hazard in storage, collection and
disposal, and therefore, they
should be considered separately in addition to being listed as hazardous chemicals. These wastes may exist in solid, liquid or gaseous
form.
Classification of Hazardous Wastes
Fig:2 Classification of Hazardous Wastes

Waste Category Sources

Radioactive substances
Toxic chemicals
Biological wastes
Flammable wastes
Explosives
Source: Tchobanoglous, et al., (1977 and 1993)
Biomedical research facilities, colleges and university laboratories, offices,
hospitals, nuclear power plants, etc.
Agricultural chemical companies, battery shops, car washes, chemical shops,
college and university laboratories, construction companies, electric utilities,
hospitals and clinics, industrial cooling towers, newspaper and photographic
solutions, nuclear power plants, pest control agencies, photographic processing
facilities, plating shops, service stations, etc.
Biomedical research facilities, drug companies, hospitals, medical clinics, etc.
Dry cleaners, petroleum reclamation plants, petroleum refining and processing
facilities, service stations, tanker truck cleaning stations, etc.
Construction companies, dry cleaners, ammunition production facilities, etc.

III. WASTE MANAGEMENT – INDIAN SCENARIO:

HPC (2001) defines Hazardous Waste as any substance, whether in solid, liquid or gaseous form, which has no foreseeable
use and which by reasons of any physical, chemical, reactive, toxic, flammable, explosive, corrosive, radioactive or infectious
characteristics causes danger or is likely to cause danger to health or environment, whether alone or when in contact with other wastes
or environment, and should be considered as such when generated, handled, stored, transported, treated and disposed off.
The hazardous waste generated in the country per annum is estimated to be around 4.4 million tonnes while as per the
estimates of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD) derived from correlating hazardous waste generation
and economic activities, nearly five million tonnes of hazardous waste are being produced in the country annually. This estimate of
around 4.4 million MTA is based on the 18 categories of wastes which appeared in the HWM Rules first published in 1989. Out o f
this, 38.3% is recyclable, 4.3% is incinerable and the remaining 57.4% is disposable in secured landfills. Thirteen States of the
country (Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Assam, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh,
Telangana, Karnataka and Rajasthan) account for 97% of total hazardous waste generation. The top five waste generating states are
Maharashtra, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Tamil Nadu. On the other hand, states such as Himachal Pradesh, Jammu &
Kashmir, all the North Eastern States excepting Assam generate less than 20,000 MT per annum. Given the wide variations in
quantity and nature of waste generated across states and union territories (UTs) and also considering the wide variations in climatic as

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1549

 www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

well as hydro-geological conditions in different regions of the country, the approach to waste management has to be essentially state
specific (NEERI).
Severe pollution of land, surface and ground water may occur (Ramakrishna and Babu, 1999a; Rao, 1999) if the options
available (Wentz, 1995; Parsa et al., 1996; Chakradhar et al., 1999) for Hazardous Waste Management (HWM) are not being
efficiently utilized by the waste generators. As per the ideal industrial siting criteria in India, the industry should have enough land
available within its premises for the treatment and disposal and or reuse/recycling of the wastes generated from it (Murali Krishna,
1995). However, very few industries in India own proper treatment and disposal facilities (Jeevan Rao, 1999). Mostly the large-scale
industries and a few medium-scale industries (Ramakrishna and Babu, 1998), and none of the small-scale industries own the above
facilities.
Disasters occur due to both the natural and man-made activities. Hazards and Disasters are categorized into four groups, viz.,
Natural events, Technological events, Man-made events and Region-wise events. There is a growing concern all over the world for
the safe disposal of HWs generated from anthropogenic sources. Hazardous Wastes (HWs) are disposed off at Treatment, Storage and
Disposal Facility (TSDF), a centralized location catering to the HW generated from the waste generators in the near vicinity. The
TSDF will help the small and medium scale industries generating HW in disposing their wastes efficiently. Literature is available on
the site selection and other related criteria of TSDF (Ramakrishna and Babu, 1999b; Lakshmi, 1999; Babu and Ramakrishna, 2000;
Babu and Ramakrishna, 2003).

IV. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK:

In India, a comprehensive legislative framework has been in place for over a decade for addressing various issues related to
hazardous waste management. However, on the implementation front, there is a significant backlog. The present paper discusses the
status of hazardous waste generation and management in India. India introduced an amendment into its constitution calling upon the
state to protect and improve the environment to safeguard public health, forests and wildlife. The forty second amendment to
the Indian Constitution was adopted in 1976, and went into effect on January 3, 1977. The Directive Principles of State Policy (Article
- 47) in the Indian Constitution requires not only that the state protect the environment, but it also compels the state to seek the
improvement of polluted environments. Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF) promulgated Hazardous Waste (Management &
Handling) Rules on 28 July 1989 under the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. In September 2008, the said rules
were repealed and new rules entitled “Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008” (here
after referred as HW (M, H & TM) Rules were notified. These rules were further amended in the year 2009 & 2010.
According to the HW (M, H & TM) Rules of 2010, any waste, which by virtue of any of its physical, chemical, reactive,
toxic, flammable, explosive or corrosive characteristics causes danger or is likely to cause danger to health or environment, whether
alone or when in contact with other wastes or substances has been defined as hazardous wastes and include wastes generated mainly
from the 36 industrial processes referred under Schedule - I of the said Rules. In addition, some wastes become hazardous by virtue of
concentration limits as well as hazardous characteristics listed under Schedule - II of the said Rules. Based on the data provided by the
State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) and Pollution Control Committees (PCCs), Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has
compiled state-wise inventory of hazardous waste generating industries The hierarchy in management of hazardous waste is to reduce,
reuse, recycle and re-process and final option of disposal of wastes having no potential for value addition, in disposal facilities in an
environmentally sound manner. The disposal facilities may be having only a secured land fill (SLF) or may be having incinerator
alone for organic wastes or combination of secured landfill &
incinerator. At present, there are 26 common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Facilities (TSDFs) in operation spread across the Country in 13 States namely Andhra Pradesh,
Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, Rajasthan,
Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal as well as in UT namely Daman, Diu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli. Thirty-five
new sites for development of TSDF have been notified by the respective State Governments and these are at different stages of
development (Central Pollution Control Board, 2010).
Waste Generation:
Hazardous Wastes generation is maximum in Maharashtra (45.47%) followed by Gujarat (9.73%). Minimum Hazardous
Wastes is reported in Chandigarh (0.0069%). The number of industries that generate Hazardous Wastes are maximum in Maharashtra
(30.38%) followed by Gujarat (22.93%) (Ramakrishna & Babu ; Agarwal & Gupta, 2011).
Characterization:
The Hazardous Wastes are categorized into three groups viz., Recyclable, Incinerable, and Disposable. The Hazardous Waste
generation trends in Maharashtra and the rest of the India are similar. The quantity of disposable Hazardous Wastes (inorganic in
nature to be disposed off in landfill) is high compared to the other two categories (Ramakrishna & Babu; Agarwal & Gupta, 2011).
Quantification:
The quantity of Hazardous Wastes generation reported in India is 4415954 TPA from 373 districts out of 525 districts.
According to one estimate (SDNP, 2003), the land required to dispose 5.3 million tons of Hazardous Wastes in an engineered landfill,
assuming the average density of waste to be around 1.2 tonnes/m3 and the depth of the landfill 4 m, would be around 1.08 km2 every
year. This information may be applied to future waste projections to arrive at future land requirements for the disposal of hazardous
waste (Ramakrishna & Babu, 1998, 1999a & 1999b ; Agarwal & Gupta, 2011).
Site Selection:

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1550

 www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

The selection of a suitable site for an effective functioning of TSDF is the key aspect and
depends upon several factors such as waste characteristics, site characteristics, public acceptance and prevailing laws & regulations.
Though the selection of an ideal site confirming with the above factors is a difficult task, few guidelines are available (Guidelines,
1991) in India for selection of best site for the same purpose. In India, unauthorized dumping of Hazardous Waste is however
continuing and in most of the places, the Hazardous Waste is being utilized to fill the low-lying areas (HPC, 2001), which is not
acceptable.

Waste Management Strategy:

Waste Avoidance and Waste Minimization at Source:
In the hierarchy of waste management, waste avoidance and waste minimization have to be attempted first. For this a close
look at the processes generating hazardous waste has to incorporate to find feasible processes and technologies for waste avoidance
and minimization and this should be done on a regular interval. As far as possible cleaner processes needs to be considered.
Reuse, Recovery and Recycling of Hazardous Waste:
Second in the hierarchy of waste management is reuse, recycle and recovery of useful resources from wastes, in that order.
MoEF may, therefore, consider constituting dedicated waste specific Task Forces so as to explore options/opportunities of reusing,
recovery and recycling of the hazardous wastes in an environmentally sound manner.

Fig. 1. Reuse, Reduce and Recycling

E-Waste:
The recycling of e-waste such as components of waste electrical and electronic assemblies
comprising accumulators and other batteries, mercury- switches, activated glass cullets from cathode- ray tubes and other activated
glass and PCB capacitors etc. is also required to be regulated
due to the presence of hazardous constituents. The guidelines in this regard have already been issued so as to ensure environmentally
sound recycling of e-waste. The producers of electronic equipment may be required to have a centralized facility for e-waste of their
brand as extended producer responsibility.
Safe Disposal of Hazardous Waste:
Waste which cannot be reused or recycled has to be disposed of in an environmentally sound manner. Depending on the
waste category, physico-chemical/bio-logical treatment, secured land disposal, incineration or any other mode of safe and
environmentally sound disposal should be adopted. Design and operational norms of such facilities, either captive or common should
strictly adhere to the guidelines framed by the Central Pollution Control Board. Supervision of such facilities during construction
stage would be necessary to ensure quality of the construction of the disposal facilities as per guidelines of Central Pollution Control
Board. Post-closure monitoring of the disposal facilities would also be necessary.
Setting-up of the Common Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities (TSDF)
Currently there are 25 Common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities in operation in 13 States. In
addition to this, 64 sites have been identified and 35 sites have been notified for setting up of the disposal facilities. The notified sites
are at different stages of development. The annual capacities of the TSDFs range from 10,000 T/annum to 1.2 lakhs
T/annum with an operating life span of 15-30 years. At the initial stages, a certain level of assistance from the State Governments
could significantly accelerate the process of setting up of
these facilities and also ensure their viability in the initial years which is vital.

Disposal of Date-Expired Drugs and Pesticides:

There are significant quantities of date –expired drugs and pesticides lying in various States, which need to be disposed of.
The options available are (i) to have these reprocessed wherever possible by the industry which supplied them (ii) to appropriately
incinerate them either through dedicated incinerators of individual industries or through incinerator available with common facilities
(TSDF).

National Hazardous Waste Management Strategy:

1. Effective management of hazardous waste, so as to avoid environmental pollution and adverse health effects due to its
improper handing & disposal.

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1551

 www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

2. To have an appropriate strategy for the regulatory bodies, generators of hazardous waste, its recyclers and operators of
facilities to minimize, recycle, treat and dispose of left over hazardous waste in an environmentally sound manner.
3. To facilitate implementation of the action plan brought out in “National Environment Policy 2006” on management aspects
of hazardous waste, and to fulfil obligations under the Basel Convention on Transboundary movement of hazardous wastes
including their
minimization environmentally sound management and active promotion of transfer and use of cleaner technologies.
V. THE BASEL CONVENTION:
India is a Party to the Basel Convention on transboundary movement of hazardous wastes. The Basel Convention is a tool for
controlling and reduction of transboundary movements of hazardous and other wastes subject to the Convention, Prevention and
Minimization of their generation, environmentally sound management of such wastes and for active promotion of the transfer and use
of cleaner technologies. As a party to the Convention, India is obliged to regulate and minimize the import of hazardous waste or
other wastes for disposal or re-cycling and also to prohibit export of waste to parties, which have prohibited the import of such wastes.
India is also required to minimize generation of hazardous waste in the country taking into account social, technological and
economic aspects (NEERI).

VI. SUMMARY & CONCLUSION:

The Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF) has elaborately identified various treatment and disposal options of different
hazardous waste streams that include physical/chemical treatment, landfill, biological, treatment, incineration etc. still secured landfill
is the most used option for disposal of waste. The rules framed by Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF) regarding hazardous
waste should be followed strictly by the industries and regulatory body should be assigned for regular monitoring purpose. Proper
treatment, storage prior to treatment or disposal and safe disposal of hazardous waste is essential for environmental health.

The Indian government promulgated the Environment (Protection) Act in 1986, which is umbrella legislation to protect and
improve the environment and to regulate the management and handling of hazardous substances and chemicals. The Ministry of
Environment and Forests continuously monitors the progress made by various state governments and union territories with respect to
the implementation of India’s Hazardous Wastes Rules. Experience in India shows that most industries respond to environmental
issues by complying with Government regulations, but if corporations do take an antagonistic position towards regulations, they
continue to be burdened with ever-increasing regulations and adverse judicial pronouncements. In the future, the corporations need to
be proactive and set voluntary standards for environmental protection and safety that minimize the chance that illogical and ill-
conceived regulations and standards are adopted. This, in turn, requires a comprehensive, constructive and cooperative policy-making
process to shape national environmental policies and regulations. Even after efforts to reduce waste are undertaken, some residuals
will remain that warrant innovative treatment and disposal methods. Developing countries should learn from the experiences of
developed nations regarding their hazardous waste management system and its related problems and also keep looking for new and
innovative solutions that achieve a better fit with the limited resources available to developing
countries.

REFERENCES
1) Agarwal, D and Gupta, A.K, 2011. Hazardous Waste Management: Analysis of Indian and Perspective Governance.
2) Babu S. and J.P. Gupta. 1997. “Waste Characterization and Treatment”, Chemical Business, October, pp. 39-42.
3) Babu, B.V. and Ramakrishna, V., 2003. Hazardous Waste Management in India.
4) Babu, B.V. and V.Ramakrishna. 2000. "Mathematical modeling of Site sensitivity indices in the site selection criteria for
hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facility", Journal of the Institution of Public Health Engineers India,Vol.
2000 (1), pp 54-70. Also available via internet as .pdf file at http://bvbabu.50megs.com/custom.html/#30.
5) Babu, B.V. and V.Ramakrishna. 2003. "Extended Studies on Mathematical Modeling of Site Sensitivity Indices in the Site
Selection Criteria for Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility", Journal of the Institution of Public Health
Engineers India. Vol. 2003 (2), pp 11-17. Also available via internet as .pdf file at
http://bvbabu.50megs.com/custom.html/#43.
6) Banerjee R. 2001. “Man made Natural Disasters”, Proc. of Conference on Disaster Management: Lessons learnt from Orissa
Cyclone and Gujarat-Rajasthan Drought, BITS, Pilani, March 5-7, pp. 14-15.

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1552

www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

7) Bhoyar R,V, S.K. Titus, A.D. Bhide, and P.Khanna. 1996. “Municipal and Industrial Solid Waste Management”, Journal
IAEM, Vol. 23 (1996), pp. 53-64.
8) Chakradhar B, Prabha Padmakaran, Deepti Mishra and R.K. Rawlley. 1999. “Development of treatment technology for
stabilization of hazardous waste”, Proceedings of National Seminar on Waste Management, Samrat Ashok Technological
Institute (Engineering College), Vidisha, India, pp. D4-24-D4-32.
9) CPCB, 2010. Performance Evaluation and Monitoring of the Common Hazardous Waste Treatment Storage and Disposal
Facilities including Common Hazardous Waste Incinerators,
10) Dutta,S.K , Upadhyay, V.P & Sridharan, U., 2006. Environmental Management of Industrial Hazardous Wastes in India.
11) E&DM. 2003. Homepage of “Emergency Disaster Management Inc.”, as on 20th Oct. 2003, the URL of which is:
http://www.emergency-management.net/. Guidelines.
12) Freeman, M. H.1988. Standard Handbook of Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New
York.
13) Guidelines for Hazardous wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, Ministry of Environment and Forests, India.
14) Guidelines for Setting up of Operating Facility. 1998. Hazardous Waste Management, Documents Series: HAZWAMS/
11/1998-99, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB).
15) HPC. 2001. “A Report of High Powered Committee on Management of Hazardous Wastes”, available via internet at
http://www.cpcb.nic.in/hpcreport/.
16) H.P.C, 2001. Report of the High Powered Committee on Management of Hazardous Wastes, Volume I. ( P - 351),Volume II
(P - 569 ) and Volume III (P - 245).
17) Identification of Hazardous Waste Generating Industry in the States of Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Punjab,
Haryana and Himachal Pradesh, Hazardous Waste Management Series: HAZWAMS /3/ 1995, Central Pollution Control
Board, March, 1995.
18) Identification of Hazardous Waste Generating Industry in Southern States (Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka and Tamil
Nadu), Hazardous Waste Management Series: HAZWAMS / 4/ 1995-96, Central Pollution Control Board, November, 1995.
19) Inventorisation of Hazardous Waste Generation in Five Districts (Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Bharuch, Surat and Valsad of
Gujarat) Hazardous Waste Management Series: HAZWAMS / 6/ 1995-96, Central Pollution Control Board.
20) Inventorisation of Hazardous Waste Generating Industries in Punjab, Hazardous Waste Management Series: HAZWAMS /
10/ 1996-97, Central Pollution Control Board, June, 1997.
21) Inventorisation of Hazardous Waste Generating Industries in Orissa, Hazardous Waste Management Series, HAZWAMS / 9/
1997-98, Central Pollution Control Board, July, 1997.
22) Inventorisation of Hazardous Waste Generation in Kerala, Hazardous Waste Management Series: HAZWAMS /8 /1996-97,
Central Pollution Control Board, June, 1997.
23) Inventorisation and Management of Hazardous Waste in Andhra Pradesh, Hazardous Waste Management Series:
HAZWAMS / 13/ 1998-99, Central Pollution Control Board, June, 1999.
24) Inventorisation and Management of Hazardous Waste in National Capital Region, Noida (Gautam Buddha Nagar,
Ghaziabad, Meerut and Faridabad), Hazardous Waste Management Series: HAZWAMS /14/1999-2000, Central Pollution
Control Board, September, 1999.

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1553

www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

25) Jeevan Rao K. 1999. “Environmental issues in developing countries”, Environment & People, Vol. 6 (1), pp. 21-23.
26) Khan, D.J , Kaseva, M.E & Mbuligue S.E., Hazardous waste issues in developing countries.
27) Khanna, P., Kumar, R., Kulkarni, V., Hazardous waste issues in india. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazardous_waste.
28) Kulkarni V.S. 1996. “Environmental Impact Assessment of Industrial projects”, Industrial Safety & Pollution Control
Handbook, A joint publication of National Safety Council and Associate (Data) Publishers Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, 2 nd edition
(1995), Second print (1996), pp. 467-471.
29) Khare D. 2001. “Warning Precursors in Disaster Management”, Proc. of Conference on Disaster Management: Lessons
learnt from Orissa Cyclone and Gujarat-Rajasthan Drought, BITS, Pilani, March 5-7, pp. 12-13.
30) Lakshmi R. 1999. “Remote Sensing application in siting of waste disposal facilities with special reference to hazardous
wastes”, in Remote Sensing Applications in Applied Sciences, edited by Saumitra Mukherjee, Manak Publications Pvt. Ltd.,
New Delhi, pp. 141-179.
31) Maudgal S.C. 1995. “Waste management in India”, Journal IAEM, Vol. 22, pp. 203-208.
32) Murali Krishna K.V.S.G. 1995. Air pollution and control, Kaushal & Co., Kakinada (A.P), India, pp. 307.
33) NGDC. 2003. Homepage of “Natural Hazards Resource Directory”, as on 20th Oct. 2003, the URL of which is:
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/hazard/resource.
34) Parsa J., H.M. Stuart and R. Steiner. 1996. “Stabilization/solidification of hazardous wastes using fly ash”, J. Environ. Engg.,
ASCE, Vol. 122 (10), pp. 935-940.
35) Phelps, H.O., Heinke. G. W., Jonker, J.F., Ouano, E.A.R. and Vandecasteele, C. 1995. Management of Solid Wastes,
UNESCO, Paris. Unit 9: Hazardous Waste: Management and Treatment 423.
36) Ramakrishna V and B.V. Babu. 1998. “Positive decision making in waste management towards achieving sustainable
development – A perspective”, Proceedings of 14th National Convention of Environmental Engineers, Institution of
Engineers (India), A.P. State Center, Hyderabad, India, pp. 9-14. Also available via internet as .pdf file at
http://bvbabu.50megs.com/custom.html/#16.
37) Ramakrishna V and B.V. Babu. 1999a. “Fresh water depletion – a crisis: Causes & remedies”, Environment & People, Vol. 6
(1), pp. 33-39. Also available via internet as .pdf file at http://bvbabu.50megs.com/custom.html/#23.
38) Ramakrishna V and B.V. Babu. 1999b. “Site selection criteria for hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facility”,
Proceedings of National Seminar on Waste Management, Samrat Ashok Technological Institute (Engineering College),
Vidisha, India, pp. D2-8-D2-15. Also available via internet as .pdf file at http://bvbabu.50megs.com/custom.html/#25.
39) Rao P.N. 1999. “Protection of environment and basic needs of mankind”, Environment & People, Vol. 6 (4), pp. 5-8.
40) Ready Recknor. 1998. Hazardous Waste Management, HWM Series: HAZWAMS / 12/ 1998-99, Central Pollution Control
Board.
41) Status of Hazardous Wastes Generation, Treatment and Disposal in Himachal Pradesh, Hazardous WasteManagement Series:
HAZWAMS / 2/ 1994-95, Central Pollution Control Board, August, 1994.
42) Status of Hazardous Wastes Generation in Karnataka, Hazardous Waste Management Series:HAZWAMS / 1/ 1994-95,
Central Pollution Control Board, March, 1995.
43) SDNP. 2003. “Hazardous waste: special reference to municipal solid waste management”, as on 20th Oct. 2003, available
via internet as .pdf file at http://sdnp.delhi.nic.in/soer/ind_waste.pdf.

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1554

www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 1 January 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882

44) Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H. and Eliassan, R. 1977. Solid Wastes-Engineering Principles and Management Issues,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
45) TEDDY. 1998. “Teri Energy Data Directory & Yearbook, 1998/99”, Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi, pp. 285.
46) Venugopalan V. 1986. “Environmental Impact Assessment”, Proceedings of “World Environment day celebrations – 5th June
1986”, organized by Institution of Engineers, A.P. State Center and A.P. Pollution Control Board, Hyderabad, pp. 1.2.2-
1.2.3..
47) Wentz Charles A. 1995. Hazardous waste management, McGraw Hill International editions, Chemical Engineering series,
McGraw Hill Inc., 2nd edition, Singapore, pp. 80-86, 296-351.

IJCRT1705220 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 1555

View publication stats