Professional Documents
Culture Documents
N - PNB v. Uy Teng Piao
N - PNB v. Uy Teng Piao
N - PNB v. Uy Teng Piao
VICKERS, J.:
4. In finding that said Mr. Pecson, granting that the latter has
actually given such promise to condone, could bind the appellant
corporation.
chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
Uy Teng Piao failed to comply with the order of the court, and the
sheriff of the City of Manila sold the two parcels of land at public
auction to the Philippine National Bank on October 14, 1924 for
P300 and P1,000 respectively. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
The bank brought the present action to revive the judgment for the
balance of P11,574.33, with interest at 7 per cent per annum from
August 1, 1930. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
P. No recuerda usted muy bien? - R. No recuerdo. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
Sr. ENDRIGA. Es alternativa la pregunta. Me opongo. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
One of the attorneys for the plaintiff testified that the defendant
renounced his right to redeem the parcel of land in Calle Ronquillo,
Exhibit 1, because a friend of the defendant was interested in
buying it. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library