Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    MECH 488L: Capstone Design: Notes

    Uploaded by

    walterbircher
    This document provides the grading rubric for Deliverable 10 of the MECH 488L Capstone Design course, which involves experimental evidence or technical demonstrations. It is out of 100 total points and evaluates: 1) the explanation of the experimental apparatus, procedure, and motivation (30 points); 2) the results, interpretation, and recommendations (65 points); and 3) references (5 points). Higher scores require more thorough, justified, coherent, and logically concluded work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    MECH 488L: Capstone Design: Notes

    Uploaded by

    walterbircher
    15 views1 page
    This document provides the grading rubric for Deliverable 10 of the MECH 488L Capstone Design course, which involves experimental evidence or technical demonstrations. It is out of 100 total points and evaluates: 1) the explanation of the experimental apparatus, procedure, and motivation (30 points); 2) the results, interpretation, and recommendations (65 points); and 3) references (5 points). Higher scores require more thorough, justified, coherent, and logically concluded work.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Deliverable 10 Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides the grading rubric for Deliverable 10 of the MECH 488L Capstone Design course, which involves experimental evidence or technical demonstrations. It is out of 100 total points and evaluates: 1) the explanation of the experimental apparatus, procedure, and motivation (30 points); 2) the results, interpretation, and recommendations (65 points); and 3) references (5 points). Higher scores require more thorough, justified, coherent, and logically concluded work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    15 views1 page

    MECH 488L: Capstone Design: Notes

    Uploaded by

    walterbircher
    This document provides the grading rubric for Deliverable 10 of the MECH 488L Capstone Design course, which involves experimental evidence or technical demonstrations. It is out of 100 total points and evaluates: 1) the explanation of the experimental apparatus, procedure, and motivation (30 points); 2) the results, interpretation, and recommendations (65 points); and 3) references (5 points). Higher scores require more thorough, justified, coherent, and logically concluded work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    MECH 488L: Capstone Design

    Assignment: Deliverable 10 (Engineering Experimentation)


    Graded by: Walter Bircher & Andy Morgan

    Total Points: 100

    Notes:
    This deliverable provides experimental evidence for your engineering analyses (D7) and/or
    more detailed and systematic encapsulation of the technical demos (D9).

    Grade Description

    30 - Explanation of Experimental Apparatus Excellent: the group identifies critical


    and Procedure, and Motivation performance-related capability to evaluate,
    thoroughly describes experimental apparatus,
    with good justification (30)
    Average: the group identifies somewhat
    appropriate performance-related capability to
    evaluate, partially describes experimental
    apparatus, with some justification (20)
    Poor: group does not identify appropriate
    performance-related capability, does not fully
    describe experiment, with little justification for
    choices (10)

    65 - Results, Interpretation, and Excellent: group clearly displays all


    Recommendations experimental results in coherent way with all
    appropriate figures and labels, interprets
    results in detailed logical way, makes
    recommendations based on logical
    conclusions (65)
    Average: group displays experimental results
    with good clarity, provides fair interpretation,
    and makes recommendations (40)
    Poor: Results are not properly displayed,
    interpretations are not well thought out,
    recommendations not based on results (20)

    5 - References Completeness

    You might also like