Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 3 Materials Technology Esrmnotes - In-1 PDF
Unit 3 Materials Technology Esrmnotes - In-1 PDF
Unit 3 Materials Technology Esrmnotes - In-1 PDF
UNIT II
III YR /V SEM
ACADEMIC YEAR :2015-2016
By
Mr. S.SHAKTHIVEL
A.P(Sr.G)
Department of Mechanical
Engineering
SRM Univeristy
Kattankulathur
---------1
where a is the length of a surface crack (or one-half the length of an internal
crack) and γ is the surface energy per unit area. Again, this equation shows
that even small flaws severely limit the strength of the ceramic.
By rearrange the stress intensity factor K equation as
-------2
This equation is similar to equation 1
The slope of the steady-state portion of the creep curve is the creep rate
Having climbed, the dislocation proceeds along the new slip plane
until it encounters another resistant obstacle, whereupon it climbs (or
descends) to another parallel plane and the process repeats. Since
dislocation motion depends on both dislocation glide and climb, the term
climb-glide creep is used to describe this form of creep.
. Climb-glide creep depends more strongly on stress than does
diffusion creep. At temperatures in excess of 0.5 Tm, dislocations can
escape from the obstacles by climbing out of the slip plane and thus can
continue to glide.
MSE 527
General Procedures
16 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Definition of Failure
17 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Definition of Failure Analysis
18 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Fundamental Sources of Failure
* Deficiencies in design.
* Deficiencies in selection of materials.
* Imperfections in materials.
* Deficiencies in processing.
* Errors in assembly.
* Improper service conditions.
19 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Impact of Failure Analysis on
Society
* Cost of failure.
* Cost of failure analysis.
* Improvement of products.
20 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
14 Stages of Failure Analysis
1. Background data. 8. Metallography
2. Preliminary exam. 9. Failure mode.
3. Nondestructive tests. 10. Chemical analysis.
4. Mechanical tests. 11. Fracture mechanics
5. Sample selection. 12. Simulated tests.
6. Macroscopic exam. 13. Analysis & report.
7. Microscopic exam. 14. Recommendations.
21 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
1. Collection of background data
and samples.
22 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Fracture A preceded fracture B.
23 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Fracture A preceded fractures B and C.
24 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
2. Preliminary Examinations.
25 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
3. Nondestructive Inspections.
26 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
4. Mechanical Testing.
* Hardness testing.
* Tensile testing.
* Shear testing.
* Impact testing.
* Fatigue testing.
* Fracture mechanics testing.
27 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
5. Selection and Preservation of
Fracture Surfaces.
28 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
6. Macroscopic Examinations
29 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
30 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
31 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
32 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
7. Microscopic Examinations
* Light microscopes:
shallow depth of field.
* Transmission Electron Microscopes (TEM):
sample preparation problems.
* Scanning Electron Microscopes ( SEM):
conductivity problems.
coating and replication techniques.
33 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Dimples typical of a ductile overload fracture by
micro-void coalescence mechanism
34 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Striations typical of fatigue failures
35 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Cleavage fracture typical of brittle overload fracture
36 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Rock candy structure typical of intergranular fracture
37 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
8. Metallographic Examination
* Class of Material:
Cast or Wrought
* General Microstructure.
* Crack Path:
Transgranular and/or Intergranular
* Heat Treatment Problems:
Decarburization, Alpha-Case, etc….
38 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Lap defect in forging
39 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Interganular crack in copper tube
40 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Crack branching in martensitic steel
41 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
9. Failure Modes
* Ductile:
Plastic Deformation
Equiaxed or Shear Dimples
Dull, Gray and usually Transgranular.
* Brittle:
No Macroscopic Plastic Deformation
Cleavage, Intergranular or Striations
Difficult to diagnose.
42 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Modes of Fracture
* Monotonic Overload
Brittle
Ductile
* Sub-Critical Crack Growth
Static Loads
Dynamic Loads
43 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Mechanisms of Fracture
* Overload - Fracture with application of load.
Ductile or Brittle
* Crack Growth - Under Load Over Time.
Fatigue
Stress Corrosion Cracking
Hydrogen Embrittlement
Creep
44 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Sub-Critical Crack Growth under
Dynamic Loads
* Fatigue
* Corrosion Fatigue
* Thermal Fatigue
45 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Sub-Critical Crack Growth under
Static Loads
46 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Some Common Fractographic
Features
Brittle Overload Cleavage
Ductile Overload Dimples
Stress Corrosion Cracking Intergranular
Hydrogen Embrittlement Intergranular
Creep Rupture Intergranular
Fatigue Striations
47 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
10. Chemical Analysis
* Optical Emission Spectroscopy
* Wet Chemical Analysis
* X-ray, Electron & Neutron Diffraction
* X-ray Fluorescence
* Infrared & Ultraviolet Spectroscopy
* Energy and Wavelength Dispersive X-ray
Analysis.
* Surface Analysis Techniques
48 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
11. Fracture Mechanics
49 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
12. Simulated-Service Testing
* Of Limited Value.
* Simulated Corrosion Tests.
* Deciding between several possible
mechanisms.
* Errors by Changing Severity of Conditions.
50 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
13. Conclusions and Report
51 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
14. Recommendations
52 of 37
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Analyze
Opportunity Part 1
2
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Benefits
Allows us to identify areas of our process that most impact
our customers
Helps us identify how our process is most likely to fail
3
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Application Examples
Manufacturing: A manager is responsible for moving a
manufacturing operation to a new facility. He/she wants to be
sure the move goes as smoothly as possible and that there are no
surprises.
Design: A design engineer wants to think of all the possible ways a
product being designed could fail so that robustness can be built
into the product.
Software: A software engineer wants to think of possible problems
a software product could fail when scaled up to large databases.
This is a core issue for the Internet.
4
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
What Can Go
Wrong?
5
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
FMEA
Why
Methodology that facilitates process improvement
Identifies and eliminates concerns early in the development of
a process or design
Improve internal and external customer satisfaction
Focuses on prevention
FMEA may be a customer requirement (likely contractual)
FMEA may be required by an applicable
Quality Management System Standard (possibly ISO)
6
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
FMEA
A structured approach to:
Identifying the ways in which a product or process can fail
Estimating risk associated with specific causes
Prioritizing the actions that should be taken to reduce risk
Evaluating design validation plan (design FMEA) or current
control plan (process FMEA)
7
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
When to Conduct an FMEA
Early in the process improvement investigation
When new systems, products, and processes are being
designed
When existing designs or processes are being changed
When carry-over designs are used in new applications
After system, product, or process functions are defined,
but before specific hardware is selected or released to
manufacturing
8
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Examples
History of FMEA
First used in the 1960’s in the Aerospace industry during
the Apollo missions
In 1974, the Navy developed MIL-STD-1629 regarding
the use of FMEA
In the late 1970’s, the automotive industry was driven by
liability costs to use FMEA
Later, the automotive industry saw the advantages of
using this tool to reduce risks related to poor quality
9
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
A Closer Look
Types of FMEAs
Design
Analyzes product design before release to production,
with a focus on product function
Analyzes systems and subsystems in early concept and
design stages
Process
Used to analyze manufacturing and assembly processes
after they are implemented
11
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Team Input
Required
12
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Process Steps
FMEA Procedure
1. For each process input (start with high value inputs), determine
the ways in which the input can go wrong (failure mode)
2. For each failure mode, determine effects
Select a severity level for each effect
13
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Process Steps
14
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Information
Flow
Inputs Outputs
C&E Matrix List of actions to
Process Map prevent causes or
Process History detect failure
Procedures FMEA modes
Knowledge
Experience History of actions
taken
15
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Analyzing
Severity, Occurrence, Failure &
Effects
and Detection
Severity
Importance of the effect on customer requirements
Occurrence
Frequency with which a given cause occurs and
creates failure modes (obtain from past data if possible)
Detection
The ability of the current control scheme to detect
(then prevent) a given cause (may be difficult to estimate early
in process operations).
16
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Assigning
Rating
Weights
Rating Scales
There are a wide variety of scoring “anchors”, both
quantitative or qualitative
Two types of scales are 1-5 or 1-10
The 1-5 scale makes it easier for the teams to decide on
scores
The 1-10 scale may allow for better precision in
estimates and a wide variation in scores (most common)
17
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Assigning
Rating
Weights
Rating Scales
Severity
1 = Not Severe, 10 = Very Severe
Occurrence
1 = Not Likely, 10 = Very Likely
Detection
1 = Easy to Detect, 10 = Not easy to Detect
18
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Calculating a
Composite
Score
19
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.
Key Points
Summary
An FMEA:
Identifies the ways in which a product or process can fail
Estimates the risk associated with specific causes
Prioritizes the actions that should be taken to reduce risk
FMEA is a team tool
There are two different types of FMEAs:
Design
Process
Inputs to the FMEA include several other Process tools such as
C&E Matrix and Process Map.
20
esrmnotes.in | Class notes made easy.