Sign in Join now

Is CDC Borrowing Pneumonia Deaths

"From Flu" for "From COVID-19?
Published on April 3, 2020

James Lyons-Weiler Follow

50 14 0
Editor In Chief at Science, Publ…

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD

The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, Pittsburgh, PA

4/3/2020

Numerous media outlets have attempted to draw comparisons between COVID-19 death
rates and influenza virus death rates.

Historically, CDC reported influenza case and death rates separately from pneumonia. After
2014, however, they inexplicably began combining influenza and pneumonia rates and
reportin them as "influenza disease deaths". Let me show you.

From CDC website, we see easily accessible case numbers for influenza were reported for
2014. In 2015 and 2016, however, influenza cases were combined with pneumonia cases.

In 2014, CDC reported 55,227 deaths from influenza or pneumonia, of which only 8.1%
(4605) were attributed to influenza. The rest were attributed to pneumonia from any cause,
including other respiratory viruses.

In 2015 and 2016, you can see no break-down is given between influenza and pneumonia,
which 57,062 deaths from "influenza/pneumonia" in 2015, and 51,537 deaths from
"influenza/pneumonia".

Using the ratio of 11 to 1, or 8.1% from 2014 and applying those rates to 2015 and 2016, we
see only 4,708 and 4,297 deaths from influenza in 2015 and 2016. There have been so far
6099 deaths (4/2/2020) attributed to COVID-19 in the US. CDC must stop combining deaths
from "Verified Influenza or Pneumonia", creating a category "Pneumonia, Unidentified
Cause" and also separate out deaths from "Verified Coronavirus" and "Pneumonia,
Unidentified Cause" so true apples-to-apples causes can be tracked weekly.

Looking at other material from CDC, we see them using the term "Influenza" for cases and
deaths varying over the years from when referencing a combined heterogeneous group
"Influenza/Pneumonia"; the number of combined deaths varied from year to year: 37,000 in
2010-2011, 32,000 in 2011-2012, 43,000 in 2012-2013, 38,000 in 2013-2014 season, 51,000
in 2014-2015, 23,000 in 2015-2016, 38,000 in 2016-2017, and estimated for 2017-2017,
61,000. From Influenza (not Influenza/Pneumonia). These numbers look much less serious if
an 8.1% rate is applied

By not parsing out other causes of pneumonia, CDC has, for years, misled the public and the
media with the term "Influenza Disease", causing everyone to believe "Influenza Disease" is
influenza and not Influenza + Pneumonia from other causes.

As a result, they have scared hundreds of millions of people into receiving an influenza
vaccine over 4500 deaths per year:

The data on COVID-19 is shining a bright light on CDC's flawed testing, flawed
bookkeeping, and their dangerous game with the American psyche.

"Underlying Conditions"

Numerous media reports attribute deaths from COVID-19 to "Underlying Conditions", with
one report claiming that 88% of deaths involving COVID-19 deaths were not caused by
COVID-19, and another claiming that 99% of COVID-19 deaths are not caused by the virus.

The age- and clinical-condition associated increased risk, however, paints a different picture.
Diabetics have a case fatality risk of over 6%, and while most deaths are in the elderly, 1/3
of deaths fall into the 20-30 year-old range. Based on egalitarian, non-agist principles,
knowing that most of the deaths are in the elderly is no assurance at all without control of
the exponential increase in deaths.

It's important to understand that causal logic dictates that the phrase "died with COVID-19"
as different from "died from COVID-19" is not a legitimate distinction capable of being
made on classes of individuals per category, because we do not know which of those cases
would have recovered from their underlying condition. Any case with double pneumonia
with COVID-19 clinical diagnoses, or with a positive RT-PCR test might be considered
death from COVID-19; cases with CT scan (live or autopsy) showing glassy opacities
characteristic of lung damage observed in known cases of COVID-19 are certainly deaths
from COVID-19 because were it not for the virus, asphyxiation and lack of oxygen, the
individual may have survived to die another day.

The subtraction of cases of high-death risk with COVID-19 infection cases from COVID-19
cases would make COVID-19 appear to be less of a threat via mortality than other
conditions, such as influenza - but remember that only 8.1% of "Flu+Pneumonia" cases were
bona fide flu cases. A valid question remains: what percentage of Influenza cases also had
underlying conditions? It is reasonable to presume that approximately the same percentage
as in COVID-19 cases. Thus, Influenza is still likely to far less deadly than COVID-19 on an
annual basis. It is difficult to assess how much more likely, but we can acknowledge that if
the typical influenza numbers of deaths in the US per year - let's say 4500 per year - have, in
2020, already been surpassed by COVID-19 cases - before both are adjusted, appropriately
or not, by the percentage of cases that allegedly "died with" vs. "died from" (a) COVID-19
and/or (b) influenza.

Indirect Effects of Social Distancing

There are concerns that social distancing may cause, in the long-run, more deaths than
would be prevented. Here is an all-cause mortality chart (seeking the source, sorry) from
CDC's Wonder . It would appear that social distancing is reducing all-cause mortality this
year, compared to other years. The concerns over net loss of life should include the lives
being saved due to fewer car and industrial accidents - as well as fewer deaths due to
influenza infections and other illnesses from transmissible viruses.

(UPDATE 4/6/2020: I found the authors, contacted them, and requested their preferred
reference. This was their reply: "We have retracted our preliminary report since we
received the following note from our network at CDC-NCHS regarding total deaths
on CDC FluView "'The data are most incomplete in the first two weeks after the week
of death but it can take up to 8 weeks for all of the deaths to be reported.'

As per the meaning of percent complete: "Percent completeness in FluView is

calculated based on the average number of deaths per week using data from the past
3 years and doesn’t take seasonality into account.

In summary, it would only be in the release of June first week will we be able to say
something conclusively about total weekly deaths by the end of March. We will share
our updated figures sometime around then and In the meantime, we would prefer if
you can refrain using the figures. We’d be happy to talk to you once the report has
been updated around the same time."

This means we will have data on the effects of social distancing on all causes of death. A
whole-society simulation should be conducted with all of the known causes of death are
included that might be attributed - both the deaths prevented and the deaths caused. Job
losses can add up to 45,000 suicides per year in the US (Mens' Health). We don't know how
long joblessness will last - if people got behind the IPAK Back to Work program w/private,
in home antibody testing so they would know their COVID-19 immunity status, we could
end the isolation in 5-7 days for most people.

So for now, the life-for-life tradeoff is something of a wash.

CDC Cooks the Books on Influenza

Under regulatory practices in the US, a condition acquires "epidemic" status if it is

responsible for 7% of deaths. This allows "Flu" to be designated as an epidemic.

Of the 1.2M specimens of respiratory illness testing in the US between Sept 29, 2019 and
the present, only 242,330 tested positive for Influenza virus (20.1%) (CDC). Thus, only
between 8.1% and 20.1% of "Flu" cases reported as "Influenza/Pneumonia" are in fact
Influenza. The correct estimate is likely far closer to the former than the latter. Here is a
revised history of Influenza in the United States:

One thing is for certain - CDC is not reporting Influenza in a manner truly useful for
comparisons between Influenza and COVID-19. In all likelihood, "Influenza" does not
qualify as an epidemic when it is reported separately from "Influenza + Pneumonia".
Does CDC combine "Influenza + Pneumonia", to force "epidemic status" to favor their push
for the influenza vaccine? Will CDC now have a COVID-19 statistic that separates
pneumonia from COVID-19 (the disease caused by SARS-2-CoV) or are they/will they
lump in pneumonia from other causes to sustain an appearance of an epidemic? The Trump
administration has admitted that their task force is missing over 50% of the test results from
COVID-19 PCR testing. We have no studies showing accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of
CDC's PCR test. How will CDC even know which numbers to cook?

In this context, people should realize that influenza vaccination can be associated with
increased risk of infection with other, non-influenza respiratory viruses. For example,
Cowling et al. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/ compared the risk
of non-influenza respiratory viral infection in two groups: individuals receiving thimerosal-
free influenza vaccines and those receiving thimerosal-containing vaccines, and found
higher risk (overall) of non-influenza viral infections in individuals who receive thimerosal-
containg influenza vaccines. In the US, 80% of flu vaccines include thimerosal for multi-
dose vial cost-savings. They also found no immunity induced to influenza via thimerosal-
containing vaccines compared to inert placebo.

Influenza vaccine also appears to increase coronavirus and metapneumovirus infection (See
Wolff et al., 2020):

“Examining noninfluenza viruses specifically, the odds of both coronavirus and

human metapneumovirus in vaccinated individuals were significantly higher when
compared to unvaccinated individuals (OR = 1.36 and 1.51, respectively) (Table 5).”

There is insufficient information on risk factors of death associated with COVID-19. Were
those who have died recently vaccinated with thimerosal-containing vaccines, which can be
expected to impair their immune response? Thimerosal, after all, inhibits the protein ERAP 1
(See: Screening Identifies Thimerosal as a Selective Inhibitor of Endoplasmic Reticulum
Aminopeptidase 1 (ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters; Stammogiannos et al., 2016).

The reasons why the US is in lock-down are (1) the CDC wanted their own test and (2) the
CDC refused a validated PCR test available in mid-January and insufficient testing. These
decisions have prevented contact tracing.

Did CDC hopefimmun to be able to just use symptomatic Coronavirus statistics and
combine COVID-19 cases with other conditions, or vice versa, as they have done with
"Influenza/Pneumonia"? What about pathogen specificity of the testing? Are we lumping
COVID-19 in w/other coronaviruses? CDC must publish accuracy studies, and soon, like
those that were published on the German test CDC refused to adopt on January 16, 2020
when they decided to make - and ship - their own flawed test.

Clearly the full costs of CDC's fast-and-loose bookkeeping on our public health is coming to
light. We cannot assess relative risk of death from influenza and COVID-19 because CDC
has been cooking the books on Influenza for years. Both the press and those in the scientific
professions alike - including those who have drawn comparisons between "Influenza" and
COVID-19 are really making comparisons between "Influenza or Pneumonia" AND
COVID-19.

I'll close the article with a reminder that we need to be like South Korea on testing -
accurate, fast testing. They used Biomedomic's COVID-19 antigen test, one that is suitable
for private, in-home testing - results in 15 minutes - so American citizens can know if they
have been exposed, and with reasonable guidelines on self-isolation, they can return to work
in weeks, not months.

No alt text provided for this image

FDA won't allow asymptomatic testing for COVID-19, preferring instead to allow perfectly
healthy - and immune Americans to sit at home while the economy rots into the earth. That's
insane. How will people who are immune due to prior exposure get back to work? How will
people who have been in lock-down but who have no symptoms know they can go back to
work? This lock-down won't last. We need to be like Korea. Get behind IPAK's Back-To-
Work program so Americans who have been exposed can take control of their lives again.

CDC is not the solution. CDC is the problem. The centralization of risk is a terrible strategy
for public health - and for biodefense. It's time to end the CDC's stranglehold on logic,
reason, and the American public's future and allow all of the scientific infrastructure and
talent and wisdom in Academia and in creative, ethical corporations to usher in a new era of
bona fide, objective science. It's time to end American-style Fascist control over US
regulatory policy. It's time to put the Pharma Bulls out to pasture. It's time for a return to
basic science, science for the sake of knowing. It's time for a new day.

Published By

Jame James Lyons-Weiler Follow

Editor In Chief at Science, Public He…
s
Lyons-
COVID-19 is shedding a very bright light on some unsavory and risky public health bookkeeping by CDC. In fact, it could
Weiler
cos them their influenza vaccine program. #publichealth

14 comments

Sign in to leave your comment

19h
Sharon Sinclair
Sharon Lifestyle and Nutrition are the cornerstone of good health
Sinclair
Magda Marshall
Like Reply

1d
Bruni Bruni Brewin
Brewin President Emeritus - Australian Hypnotherapists' Association - in therapy practice since 1989

Unsavoury and risky is putting it mildly. Deliberate more likely to feather their own nest. I was
gobsmacked when I saw that all the fraudulent or ignorant doctors kept coming out and saying
that the research shows that vaccines do not cause Autism. Yet they did not have one properly
conducted research to prove that it didn't. They also refuse to do a research between
unvaccinated children versus vaccinated children. Why? one can only assume they are
concerned about the outcome.
Like Reply 1 Like 1 Reply

Bruni Bruni Brewin 1d

Brewin President Emeritus - Australian Hypnotherapists' Association - in therapy practice since 1989

* President Emeritus is an honorary title. All writing in my emails, website, workshops,

articles, media, or elsewhere, are my thoughts alone. They should not be seen to be or
interpreted as the thinking of the current National Executive of the AHA
Like Reply

2d
Matt Matt Olsen
Olsen

Thank you James for another excellent post. I loved the closing paragraph.
Like Reply

2d
Dr. Dr. Matthew Loop
MatthewSocial Media Made Me Rich: Here's How it Can Do the Same for You
Loop
The CDC should be taken out with the trash. Way too many conflicts of interest. This is not the
first time they've manipulated data.
Like Reply 1 Like

Katie Katie Koller 2d

Koller Healthcare Cash Management Sales at PNC Bank

Interesting yet not surprising. Thanks for your research and putting this article together James!
Like Reply

Mehrtash Olson 2d
MehrtashTechnology Teacher at Durham Public Schools
Olson
Typo in your third sentence: "reportin"
Like Reply

Show more comments.

More from James Lyons-Weiler 34 articles

Special Report: Social Distancing in the United 3/28/2020 COVID-19 Effective R0 in the US: We CDC's Deadly Testing Fiasco: Centralization of
States is Working 4-2-2020 are Still Not Doing Enough Public Health Authority a Threat to National
Security
Special Report: Social Distancing in the… 3/28/2020 COVID-19 Effective R0 in the
April 2, 2020 US:… CDC's Deadly Testing Fiasco:
March 28, 2020 Centralization…
March 25, 2020

© 2020 About User Agreement Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Copyright Policy Brand Policy Guest Controls Community Guidelines Language