Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kasaysayan Saysay Salaysay
Kasaysayan Saysay Salaysay
HISTORY
from the Greek word “historia”
inquiry designed to elicit the truth
investigation
information
learning
TRADITIONAL DEFINITION
records of the past
record of human past
past of mankind (Gottschalk, p.43)
based only on written accounts
interviews /oral history /oral traditions and cultural artifacts are not considered records
MODERN DEFINITION
reconstruction of the past based on available written records, oral history, cultural artifacts, and folk
traditions
study of EVENTS and DEVELOPMENTS
involves the collection, analysis, and synthesis of sources
historians should do the important tasks of:
interpreting and recreating facts in an orderly and intelligible manner
discovering patterns and trends (Theories in History)
KASAYSAYAN
saysay
katuturan, kabuluhan, kahulugan
salaysay
kuwento
samakatuwid, angkasaysayan ay salaysayhinggilsanakaraanna may saysay para sasarilinglipunan at
kultura
HISTORY
interpretative and imaginative study of surviving records of the past, either written or unwritten, in
order to determine the meaning and scope of human existence
the soul of a nation that provides information of past events.
DIVISIONS OF HISTORY
• unrecorded history (pre-historic)
– refers to those early times of which there are no written records
– no system of writing existed
– Paleolithic, Neolithic, Metal Age
• recorded history (historic)
– refers to that period of which there are written records of some kind
– Ancient, Middle Ages, Modern, Contemporary (western)
SOURCES OF HISTORY
primary sources
written at the time the event occurred, by someone who was part of the event or witness of the
event
graphic / visual materials and artifacts
fossils
oral tradition(oral literature, interviews)
secondary sources
based on primary sources
usually found in textbooks,
encyclopedias, journal articles
SOURCES OF HISTORY
writtenprimary sources
chronicle, diary, memoirs, report, letter, diplomatic dispatch, surveyor’s notes
social documents:
birth, death, marriage certificates
church, police, school, government, business, hospital records
title deeds, census reports, directories, souvenir programs
statistical tables, graphs, charts
dictionaries, inscriptions, literary works
unwrittenprimary sources
archeological evidence:
tools, weapons, utensils, coins
old structures and landmarks, old maps
buried artifacts, skeletal remains, funeral paraphernalia
creative expressions, arts and crafts
old sketches/ drawings/ graffiti
photographs, heirlooms, keepsakes
oral evidence, recordings
tales, folk songs, protest songs, popular rituals
METHOD OF DETERMINING AGE RANGE PROCESS
AGE OF ARTIFACTS
1. CULTURAL DATING Up to 5,000 years ago Use written records of known age to date
(Use of Written Records) artifacts along with them
a. Absolute Dating Archeologists decide based on years of an
object
b. Relative Dating Comparison with other objects
2. SCIENTIFIC DATING
a. Dendrochronology Up to about 8, 000 years ago Match the pattern in wooden object to a
master tree ring pattern; count the rings
b. Radiocarbon Dating From about 1,000 to 60, 000 Measure the amount of radiocarbon remaining
years ago in the object (remains of plants and animals)
c. Potassium Argon Dating More than 500, 000 years ago Compare the amounts of potassium and argon
present in volcanic rock (bones and tools inside
rocks)
ORAL HISTORY
pass knowledge, culture, tradition and history through word of mouth
• usually in the form of stories, songs, folktales, epics, myths and legends.
• although they are not written, can be considered as history because they provide a clear description of
society’s past
LEVELS OF HISTORY
scope
biography
genealogy
local history
national history
focus
political history
cultural history
special history
metahistory
2 COMPONENTS IN HISTORY
sources
historian
HISTORICAL METHODOLOGY
Choosing a topic
Gathering of sources
Examination of sources or
Historical Criticism(External and Internal Criticism)
Extraction of data from authentic and credible sources
Writing of history
must be well-organized, coherent and elegantly written
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
External Internal
question of authenticity problem of credibility, reliability
check materials for forgery/anachronism higher level criticism
examines the physical appearance of the source criticism
document genesis of source (provenance) –by whom
(eg: color of paper used, condition and interpretation – deciphering intended
characteristics of the paper, ink used, meaning of author
handwriting style, etc. ) authorial authority – with what authority does
examines the words used in the document the author speak?
auxiliary tools competence of eyewitness – psychological
paleography (handwriting) state of author, selectivity of report,
diplomatics (charters, conventions) prejudices, outside influences especially of
archaeology (archaeomagnetic higher authorities
analysis, dendrochronology) could observer have understood what
statistics (marriage, birth records, s/he saw
economic growth) was observer technically or socially
sigillography (seals) qualified to understand what s/he saw
chronology (ways of keeping, marking could observer actually believe what
time) he saw
codicology (handwritten books- difference between what observer
material, binding, cataloging, might consciously know and be able to
preservation) report and the way her/his
papyrology (writing on papyrus) consciousness is affected by the
epigraphy (texts written on stone / culture s/he inhabits
metal) trustworthiness of observer – tendency of
heraldry (coats of arms people to lie necessitates the study of the
numismatics (coins) author’s life
linguistics (grammar vocabularies) check for inconsistencies, lapses,
genealogy (family relationships) suppressions in the story
proposography (biographical political motives, pressures (fear for
materials to construct group portraits life, or well-being, job security,
influence, connections), vanity