Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design of Goods and Services
Design of Goods and Services
5
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
6
Goods and Services Selection (1 of 3)
7
Goods and Services Selection (2 of 3)
8
Goods and Services Selection (3 of 3)
9
Product Decision
10
Product Strategy Options
• Differentiation
– Shouldice Hospital
• Low cost
– Taco Bell
• Rapid response
– Toyota
11
Product Life Cycles
12
Product Life Cycle (1 of 4)
13
Life Cycle and Strategy
Introductory Phase
• Fine tuning may warrant unusual expenses for
1) Research
2) Product development
3) Process modification and enhancement
4) Supplier development
14
Product Life Cycle (2 of 4)
Growth Phase
• Product design begins to stabilize
• Effective forecasting of capacity becomes necessary
• Adding or enhancing capacity may be necessary
15
Product Life Cycle (3 of 4)
Maturity Phase
• Competitors now established
• High volume, innovative production may be needed
• Improved cost control, reduction in options, paring down
of product line
16
Product Life Cycle (4 of 4)
Decline Phase
• Unless product makes a special contribution to the
organization, must plan to terminate offering
17
Product Life Cycle Costs
18
Product-By-Value Analysis
19
Generating New Products
20
Figure 3 Product Development Stages
21
Quality Function Deployment (1 of 2)
22
Quality Function Deployment (2 of 2)
23
QFD House of Quality
24
House of Quality Sequence
25
House of Quality Example (1 of 9)
26
House of Quality Example (2 of 9)
27
House of Quality Example (3 of 9)
28
House of Quality Example (4 of 9)
29
House of Quality Example (5 of 9)
30
House of Quality Example (6 of 9)
31
House of Quality Example (7 of 9)
32
House of Quality Example (8 of 9)
33
House of Quality Example (9 of 9)
Completed House of Quality
34
House of Quality Sequence
35
Organizing for Product Development (1 of 3)
36
Organizing for Product Development (2 of 3)
• Team approach
– Cross functional – representatives from all disciplines
or functions
– Product development teams, design for
manufacturability teams, value engineering teams
• Japanese “whole organization” approach
– No organizational divisions
37
Organizing for Product Development (3 of 3)
38
Manufacturability and Value Engineering
• Benefits:
1. Reduced complexity of the product
2. Reduction of environmental impact
3. Additional standardization of components
4. Improvement of functional aspects of the product
5. Improved job design and job safety
6. Improved maintainability (serviceability) of the product
7. Robust design
39
Figure 5 Cost Reduction of a Bracket via
Value Engineering
40
Issues for Product Design
• Robust design
• Modular design
• Computer-aided design (CAD)
• Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)
• Virtual reality technology
• Value analysis
• Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
41
Robust Design
42
Modular Design
43
Computer Aided Design (CAD)
44
Extensions of CAD
45
Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM)
46
Benefits of CAD/CAM
1. Product quality
2. Shorter design time
3. Production cost reductions
4. Database availability
5. New range of capabilities
47
Virtual Reality Technology
48
Value Analysis
49
Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment
(LCA)
50
Product Development Continuum (1 of 3)
51
Figure 6 Product Development Continuum
52
Product Development Continuum (2 of 3)
53
Product Development Continuum (3 of 3)
• Alliances
– Cooperative agreements between independent
organizations
– Useful when technology is developing
– Reduces risks
54
Defining a Product
55
Monterey Jack Cheese (1 of 2)
56
Monterey Jack Cheese (2 of 2)
57
Product Documents
• Engineering drawing
– Shows dimensions, tolerances, and materials
– Shows codes for Group Technology
• Bill of Material
– Lists components, quantities and where used
– Shows product structure
58
Engineering Drawings
59
Bills of Material (1 of 2)
60
Bills of Material (2 of 2)
61
Make-Or-Buy Decisions
62
Group Technology
63
Group Technology Scheme
Figure 10 A Variety of Group Technology Coding Schemes
Move Manufactured Components from (a) Ungrouped to (b)
Grouped (families of parts)
64
Group Technology Benefits
1. Improved design
2. Reduced raw material and purchases
3. Simplified production planning and control
4. Improved layout, routing, and machine loading
5. Reduced tooling setup time, work-in-process, and
production time
65
Documents for Production
• Assembly drawing
• Assembly chart
• Route sheet
• Work order
• Engineering change notices (ECNs)
66
Figure 11(a) Assembly Drawing
67
Figure 11(b) Assembly Chart
68
Route Sheet
Lists the operations and times required to produce a
component
69
Work Order
70
Engineering Change Notice (ECN)
71
Configuration Management
72
Product Life-Cycle Management (PLM)
• Integrated software that brings together most, if not all,
elements of product design and manufacture
– Product design
– CAD/CAM
– DFMA
– Product routing
– Materials
– Layout
– Assembly
– Maintenance
– Environmental
73
Service Design
74
Process-Chain-Network (PCN) Analysis (1 of 3)
75
Process-Chain-Network (PCN) Analysis (2 of 3)
76
Process-Chain-Network (PCN) Analysis (3 of 3)
77
Adding Service Efficiency (1 of 2)
78
Adding Service Efficiency (2 of 2)
80
Application of Decision Trees to Product
Design (1 of 2)
82
Application of Decision Trees to Product
Design (2 of 2)
Procedure
1. Include all possible alternatives and states of nature –
including “doing nothing”
2. Enter payoffs at end of branch
3. Determine the expected value of each branch and
“prune” the tree to find the alternative with the best
expected value
83
Figure 13 Decision Tree for Development of a New Product
Decision Tree Example (1 of 4)
Silicon, Inc., a semiconductor manufacturer, is
investigating the possibility of producing and
marketing a microprocessor. Undertaking this project
will require either purchasing a sophisticated CAD
system or hiring and training several additional
engineers. The market for the product could be
either favorable or unfavorable. Silicon, Inc., of
course, has the option of not developing the new
product at all.
With favorable acceptance by the market,
sales would be 25,000 processors selling for $100
each. With unfavorable acceptance, sales would be
only 8,000 processors selling for $100 each. The
cost of CAD equipment is $500,000, but that of
hiring and training three new engineers is only
$375,000. However, manufacturing costs should
drop from $50 each when manufacturing without
CAD to $40 each when manufacturing with CAD.
The probability of favorable acceptance of
the new microprocessor is .40; the probability of
unfavorable acceptance is .60. 85
Decision Tree Example (2 of 4)
Figure 13 [Continued]
86
Decision Tree Example (3 of 4)
Figure 13 [Continued]
87
Decision Tree Example (4 of 4)
Figure 13 [Continued]
88
Example 2
• Ritz Products's materials manager, Tej Dhakar, must determine whether to make
or buy a new semiconductor for the wrist TV that the firm is about to produce.
One million units are expected to be produced over the life cycle. If the product is
made, start-up and production costs of the make decision total $1 million, with a
probability of .4 that the product will be satisfactory and a .6 probability that it will
not If the product is not satisfactory, the firm will have to reevaluate the decision.
If the decision is reevaluated, the choice will be whether to spend another $1
million to redesign the semiconductor or to purchase. Likelihood of success the
second time that the make decision is made is .9. If the second make decision
also fails, the firm must purchase. Regardless of when the purchase takes place,
Dhakar's best judgment of cost is that Ritz will pay $0.50 for each purchased
semiconductor plus $1 million in vendor development cost.
• a) Assuming that Ritz must have the semiconductor (stopping or doing without is
not a viable option), what is the best decision?
• c) What is the worst that can happen to Ritz as a result of this particular decision?
What is the best that can happen? 89
If the product is made, start-up and production costs of the make decision total $1 million, with a probability of .4
that the product will be satisfactory and a .6 probability that it will not If the product is not satisfactory, the firm will
have to reevaluate the decision. If the decision is reevaluated, the choice will be whether to spend another $1
million to redesign the semiconductor or to purchase. Likelihood of success the second time that the make
decision is made is .9. If the second make decision also fails, the firm must purchase. Regardless of when the
purchase takes place, Dhakar's best judgment of cost is that Ritz will pay $0.50 for each purchased
semiconductor plus $1 million in vendor development cost
• a) Assuming that Ritz must have the semiconductor (stopping or doing without is not a
viable option), what is the best decision?
• c) What is the worst that can happen to Ritz as a result of this particular decision?
What is the best that can happen?
Answer
• (a) The best decision would be to buy the semiconductors. This decision has an
expected payoff (cost) of $1,500,000.
• (c) The worst that can happen is that Ritz fails at its attempt to make semiconductors,
ends up buying them instead, and spends $3,500,000. The best that can happen is
that they make the semiconductors and spend only $1,000,000.
91
Transition to Production (1 of 2)
92
Transition to Production (2 of 2)
93
Copyright
94