Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Method of Research
Method of Research
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Research Paper
Submitted to:
Dr. Juris C. Ponio
Submitted by:
Kim Arrianne A. Cunanan
Women and men aren't as different as you might think: A review of dozens of studies
found that men and women are basically alike when it comes to personality, thinking ability and
leadership. The differences that do exist may reflect social expectations, not biology. Despite
this evidence, the media continue to spread the idea that the sexes are fundamentally different
and running a new business, which typically begins as a small business, such as a start-up
company, offering a product, process or service. It has been defined as the "...capacity and
willingness to develop, organize, and manage a business venture along with any of its risks in
For centuries females have taken the back seat in male oriented social systems.
Globally, the number of women entrepreneurs lags behind the number of men. In the
Philippines, though women are playing a key role in society, still their entrepreneurial ability has
not been properly tapped due to the lower status of women in society. The main purpose of this
paper was to find out the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of women in a rural area.
The researchers used the quantitative research with survey questionnaire and a total of 150
women was targeted as respondents of this study. Other relevant information was gathered
through an online researches. The adequate related literature and studies gave the researchers
the proper direction on how the investigation was done. Most of the women were aged 26 - 30,
married, with at least two children, and a baccalaureate degree holders. They managed their
own businesses and earning a monthly income of Php 10,001 to Php 20,000. The women
entrepreneurs were good in marketing (selling), record keeping, business management, critical
thinking, planning and research, decision-making, organization, and oral communication skills.
However, they needed training in written communication and managerial skills. The local
skills in the identified areas, and community must promote and institutionalize the women's
increased and sustained economic development and growth. While this is particularly the case
in developing countries with significant poverty and high unemployment rates, it also relates to
growth as opposed to stagnating growth (Ambrish, 2014; Meyer, 2017; Meyer and Meyer,
2017).
According to the Asian Development Bank (2007), females in Asia contribute significantly
towards economic development, but face different constraints and opportunities when compared
to males. McAdam (2013) adds to this by indicating that female entrepreneurship has drawn
enormous attention to policy formulation, literature studies and practical research since
countries’ economies. Furthermore, female entrepreneurial activity has been accepted as a vital
part of the economic profile of a country, as has the argument that empowering female
entrepreneurs act as fuel for flourishing economies (Ambrish, 2014; Kot et al.,2016).Carter et
al., (2006) assert that females are becoming essential change agents within the social and
economic environments and are globally responsible for making valuable contributions towards
job and wealth creation and economic growth. Notwithstanding the impact and role females
have in today’s economies, their contribution is often understated and undervalued (Carter et
noteworthy proportion of economic production in many economies, women still face tremendous
challenges when it comes to the growth and expansion of their businesses. In some cases,
even starting a business can be a challenge for some females (Gatewood et al., 2009). Over the
have been formulated. Schumpeter’s definition during the early 1930 considers entrepreneurs to
“be those who create new combinations, new markets, product, or distribution systems” (De
Bruin et al., 2006). More recent definitions by Shane (2003) and Ambrish (2014) also refer to an
entrepreneur as an individual who possesses the skill to exploit opportunities by introducing new
or better ways to provide goods and services to the economy, to enhance methods and improve
ways of organising and by establishing a new business or revitalising an existing one by such
means as improved service or product delivery. Historical and recent definitions in the field of
designing new combinations of processes; while one of the principal traits of entrepreneurship is
ultimately starting new organisations (Bird and Brush, 2002). Various definitions for female
entrepreneurs have also been established in recent years. In the UK and US, a female-owned
business refers to one that is either fully or majority (51% or more) owned by females. The
business and ensuring that at least 51 percent of employment provided by the business should
posed: If the concept of entrepreneurship has been clearly defined by so many researchers and
experts in this field, why is it so important that continuous new research paths focussing on
As more females venture into the field of entrepreneurship globally, research approaches and
theoretical perspectives to understand the role women play within this sector require clearer
definition (De Bruin et al., 2007; Onyishi and Agbo, 2010).Since females have been formally
entering the sector of entrepreneurship during the last few decades, they can be considered as
one of the fastest growing entrepreneurial populations in the world (Brush and Cooper, 2012).
economic movement and growth that creates not just jobs for themselves, but for others as well.
In addition, females in some cases often provide society with alternative solutions to various
social problems. Secondly, the topic of female entrepreneurship has previously been neglected
in social sciences and in general society. However, this is slowly changing as more women are
entering into the market and policies assisting in the development and management of such
entrepreneurship are gradually becoming more prevalent in many countries. The World Bank
sustainable development and that succeeding in this endeavour could enhance economic
efficiency. Because business and entrepreneurship are still perceived in many countries and
cultures as a male dominated sphere, it remains a priority to provide women with equal access
to opportunities and continuous research on female entrepreneurship could assist in doing so.
Bird and Brush (2002) and De Bruin et al., (2006) suggest that historical theory and research on
entrepreneurship focussed on men and that the perception was created that entrepreneurship is
formed around male experience and capabilities. Various allusions regarding entrepreneurship
as a male dominated field have been made in the past. In 1921, a reference was made to the
(Scranton, 2010). This trend continued with a statement made in 1968 terming an entrepreneur
as a “hero who perceives the gaps and connects markets” (Bird and Brush, 2002) whereas, in
1982 Hebert and Link referred to an entrepreneur as the “key man”. It makes sense that the
literature and theory was viewed from a male perspective in the past, because for many years
females were not active in the business and economic sector. But as times have changed and
women are entering this previously male dominated industry, the need for new and female-
relevant research is growing (Heber and Link, 1982). Leading researchers in the field of female
entity as there are significant differences between male and female motivations, characteristics
distinguishing features in some of the methods and ways that female entrepreneurs manage
their businesses and compile strategies(Bird and Brush, 2002; Greene et al., 2003; Brush et al.,
2006; Carter et al., 2006; Meyer and Mostert, 2016). Carter et al., (2006) specifically refer to
women being more risk and debt averse, which could lead to certain conclusions about why
their businesses are in many cases not attracting the investment opportunities that their male
counterparts so often do. In addition, Botha et al., (2007) suggest that some women might need
more assistance with regard to self-esteem and confidence than traditional male entrepreneurs.
Barsh and Yee (2011) further contend that women face different structural obstacles, lifestyle
issues and individually embedded mind-sets when compared to men. While there is proof that
similarities between certain entrepreneurial traits in men and women exist, there are clear
differences in many other aspects. Greene et al., (2003) report that over the last 25 years
various research have identified similarities between male and female entrepreneurs, but that
these investigations lack substantial discussion of the differences. Some of the most compelling
differences between male and female entrepreneurs include: reasons for starting a business,
the choice of business, how they finance their start-ups, governance structures, growth patterns
and some aspects of the entrepreneurial process. Various differences are present in the
The dimensions of the entrepreneurial process: time, concept of reality, action and interaction,
ethics and power are all often performed in a different and more subtle manner when viewed
from a female perspective. In addition to this, Bird and Brush (2002) further explain that there
are clear differences in the way that traditional and new ventures and organisations are started
and the way that they would be managed from a female perspective. For example, the way a
traditional entrepreneur might make use of resources would be to “lease” people, show low
commitment and be a promoter, whereas a female entrepreneur might take a different approach
by committing to people and taking the form of a trustee. There are also differences in the
asserts that there are many similarities in the operating profile of small businesses despite the
varying traits of the owners, but that there is indeed a significant difference within the operating
profiles of female owners. Many still follow a feminised working pattern, trying to balance work,
home and childcare. While some might say this pattern is acceptable, many may see it as
discrediting the value and growth potential of the business (McAdam, 2013). This need for
emerging countries where culture still plays a huge role in the development and empowerment
of women. Many cultures still believe that women are solely responsible for home and family
related tasks as well as purposes of reproduction (De Bruin et al., 2006; Karanja and Bwisa,
2013). This could restrict women from starting a business or hinder their growth potential owing
to their status within the community. Many African cultures still implement a policy where
women are not allowed to own any assets and which holds that everything they own actually
belongs to their husbands, creating structural and cultural challenges for female entrepreneurs
(Chitsike, 2000; Mungai and Ogot, 2012). According to the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
(GEM) women tend to lack confidence compared to their male equals when it comes to
business matters, despite their origin, education level, work status and so forth (Herrington et
al., 2009). Research has also consistently confirmed that early-stage entrepreneurial activity
(TEA) is gender sensitive due to societal, cultural and economic issues (Singer et al.,
2015).Furthermore, perceptions that women are less capable than males in the field of
business, are still widely held by many cultures; even by some westernised economies.
McAdam (2013) asserts that females are a diverse group and that deeper studies into culture,
ethnicity, class and education are also important and could indeed influence the way women
perceive business ownership and manage their ventures. As research in many cases have a
direct and indirect link to management policies and improvements in strategies, having more
high impact data available could contribute to improved management in certain cases.
many would agree that more, and a better body of research is needed in the area of female
entrepreneurship. One of the discussions by experts in the literature concerns the gap in
research into female entrepreneurship. Despite more studies in this area being undertaken over
the past few decades, there is still a gap in the available literature. From the studies on female
entrepreneurship, one may note that many of them focus on investigating individual level and/or
country or regional profiles. Few studies pursue general research on entrepreneurship that
involves analysis at firmlevel and integrated-level (De Bruin et al., 2007). It has also been
suggested that cross-country studies will be desirable in future. In addition to this, comparisons
between different women groups or samples are necessary. For example, will women from a
rural African community display the same entrepreneurial characteristics as women from a
sophisticated first world country? Greene et al., (2003) furthermore suggest that additional
research is required on the role of human capital, strategic choices and structural barriers in
female entrepreneurship. A report issued by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) in
South Africa indicated that there is a major absence of high quality empirical studies on female
entrepreneurs and that statistical data is lacking (Jiyane et al., 2012). Brush and Cooper (2012)
further assert that female entrepreneurship is understudied and not well-documented. De Bruin
et al. (2006) scrutinised the number of publications placed in the top eight entrepreneurship
journals between 1994 and 2006 and found that a mere six to seven percent related to female
entrepreneurship. In addition to this, Greene et al.,(2003) prepared a similar study on nine of the
leading entrepreneurial journals from 1976 to 2001 and found that in 661 issues published
during that time, a mere 129 articles concentrated on women entrepreneurship or business
development. Adding to this is the fact that most of these publications appeared after 1990 and
that just 7 percent of these articles used a conceptual approach or were based on literature
reviews. Ahl (2002) found that some of the so-called “A-journals” in the field of management did
not publish noticeably on entrepreneurship and even if they did, there was almost nothing on
and Administrative Science Quarterly) between the years 1985 and 1999 just 97 articles out of
5291 were entrepreneurship related and of these, just three reported on female
entrepreneurship. This equals a mere 0.056 percent of all articles from these journals. She
conducted a similar search in five leading European journals ranging from 1981 to 1993 (first
publication issues of each journal) until 2002 and found just 12 research articles that were on
the topic of entrepreneurship while none of these addressed female or gender related
entrepreneurship.
entrepreneur emerged in the 1930s. The late 1970s witnessed the emergence of an explicit
sub-domain of women entrepreneurship (Jennings and Brush, 2013). This section outlines the
In 1976, Schwartz published the first academic paper on female entrepreneurship in the Journal
of Contemporary Business and the first policy report in this area titled “The bottom line: Unequal
enterprise in America” was released in 1979 in Washington DC. Hisrich and O’Brien (1981)
made the first academic conference presentation on women entrepreneurs at the Babson
Initial research on entrepreneurship assumed that male and female entrepreneurs were
generally the same and there was no specific need for a separate investigation (Bruni et al.
2004). As a result, the sub-domain of women entrepreneurship did not develop as a significant
area until the late 1990s to early 2000s (Jennings and Brush, 2013) with the launch of two
enterprises was held in 1998. Second, an academic conference Diana International was held in
2003.
It was not until 2009 that a niche journal titled the International Journal of Gender and
Entrepreneurship area recognized the growing need for research in this area. The journal of
2006 and 2007 (de Bruin et al. 2006) and then again in 2012 (Hughes et al., 2012).
special report on women and entrepreneurship in 2006 followed by subsequent reports in 2010,
2012 and 2015. In 2015, Global Entrepreneurship Development Institute published the Female
Entrepreneurship Index report that analyzed conditions for fostering women entrepreneurship in
77 countries. As per the report, the top ten countries for female entrepreneurs in 2015 were-
United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Denmark, Netherlands, France, Iceland, Sweden,
In recent years, the debate about the marginality of women in academic science has
been extended to academics’ engagement with industry and their commercial efforts
key driver of economic growth and job creation. Indeed, an estimated $4.5 trillion would be
added to Asia and the Pacific’s gross domestic product by 2025 by closing the gender
significantly to advancing women’s rights and increasing their influence (The Asia Foundation,
2018). Women form a nation’s significant human resource (Pierce, Achdiawan, & Roshetko,
development of the economy as well as to their community. Women, on the other hand, are
willing to take up business and lend their contributions to the growth of the nation. Women are
now ready to do all business and enter all professions like trade, industry, engineering, etc.
(The Asia Foundation, 2018; Pedro, 1942; Pierce et al., 2016) The role and participation of
women are recognized and steps are being taken for the promotion of women entrepreneurship,
women must be shaped up properly with other entrepreneurial traits and skills to face the
challenges of world markets, meet the changes in the trends, be competent enough to
sustain and strive for excellence in the entrepreneurial field (Bumatay, Sulabo, & Ragus,
2008; Fini, Marzocchi, & Sobrero, 2009; Holwerda, 2018). Complete entrepreneurial
development in a nation can be achieved by the participation of women and therefore the
entrepreneurship culture and qualitative business development services are the major
requirements for industrials growth, especially contribute to the growth of every woman.
Entrepreneurial skills are essential for industrialization and for the alleviation of mass
unemployment and poverty. Today, women in advanced market economics own more than 25
percent of all businesses and women-owned businesses in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe,
and Latin America are growing rapidly. In some regions of the world, the transformation of the
economically more powerful than as a mere worker because ownership not only confers
control over assets and liabilities but also gives her the freedom to make decisions. Through
entrepreneurship development a woman will not only generate income for other women in the
locality, but also will have a multiplier effect in the generation of income and poverty
alleviation (Emm, Ks, Gomolemo, & Oa, 2017; García-rodríguez & Gil-soto, 2017; Junior,
Antonio, Gimenez, & Wendling, 2018; Mamun, Binti, Nawi, Farhah, & Binti, 2016; Sánchez-
entrepreneur is economically more powerful than as a mere worker because ownership not only
confers control over assets and liabilities but also gives her the freedom to make decisions.
Through identifying entrepreneurial skills, a woman generation the skills for their own self-
development (I. Ismail, Husin, Abdul, Mohd, & Che, 2016; Jovane, Seliger, & Stock, 2017;
Wickstrøm, Liu, & Schøtt, 2017). Empowering women is a challenge. Micro-enterprises not
only enhance national productivity, generate employment, but also help to develop
development and at least the nation development (D. Ismail, Khairy, & Domil, 2014; Schneider,
2017; Suzana et al., 2014). Entrepreneurship development among women can be considered
technology are the two important factors of growth in the new economic order. To activate
entrepreneurship. Further, the growth of women entrepreneurship has been relatively high in
2011; Nardi & Fella, 2017; Rachwa, 2011; Sánchez & Sahuquillo, 2012; Stephany, Fontinele,
Maria, Barros, & Moraes, 2017; Yang, Liu, & Mai, 2018).
The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Report for Women 2016/17 reports that
274 million women were already running their own businesses across 74 economies, of which
down the barriers that limited businesses by cultures, gender and geography, many partnership
and trade agreements have been developed in an attempt to encourage global economic
activity among women. Women are known to give back about 90 percent of their earnings to the
health and education of their communities and families, contributing to development directly, so
it’s easy to see why it is critical. Understanding women’s entrepreneurial attitudes, trends and
activity from all over the globe will help shape government policies at various levels along with
the numerous educational and training programs aimed at improving the business environment
for women.
Here are some interesting findings -- and paradoxes -- from the GEM Women report:
1. Developing economies see a higher male-female parity among entrepreneurs than developed
economies.
Asia and Latin America showed the highest parity between male and female entrepreneurs,
the innovation-driven stage of development saw women start businesses at 60 percent the rate
of men -- a surprisingly sharp decline from factor-driven economies. Despite the advantage of
entrepreneurship.
More women than men, about 20 percent more, cite opportunity as the primary reason for
venturing into business even in factor-driven economies. This only becomes more pronounced
in the innovation-driven group, where women are three and a half times more likely to cite
that women entrepreneurs have a 5 percent greater likelihood of innovativeness than men
Related: Danica Patrick Spent Years Preparing to Retire -- by Laying the Groundwork for a New
Career
Though the number of women who aspire to start their businesses is closer to the number of
men, the gap widens among business-owners, indicating that women are less likely to start their
business and also more likely to exit at early stages or between phases of transition (4 out of 10
Business discontinuance among women is associated with lower growth expectations and
dealing with their expected roles as primary caregivers for their families.
In the developed economies, more than half of women-led businesses are seen to be clustered
around government, health, education and social services. The report shows that women are
geared towards sectors typically dependent on human capital -- possibly due to women’s
While developing countries showed higher entrepreneurial activity, fewer enterprises were likely
for sustainable businesses but registered slower growth than men-owned businesses.
Laurel Delaney, founder of Women Entrepreneurs Grow Global and author of the bestselling
book “Exporting: The Definitive Guide to Selling Abroad Profitably,” says “Even in a developed
economy, women business owners are less likely to explore and expand their products or
services because they think they can’t do it, or that they don’t have access to the right training,
education, advisory networks, mentorships and community programs. This perceived deficiency
makes it difficult for women to access markets, conduct marketing and establish relationships.”
Related: A Day in the Life of Jen Gotch, the Female Badass Behind the Multimillion-Dollar
Company Ban.do
Entrepreneurial participation was seen to decline with an increase in the level of education,
suggesting that general education is less relevant for building entrepreneurial skills or
competencies.
This fact is demonstrated by the emergence of entrepreneurial activities in the most unexpected
of places. A refugee camp in South Sudan was found to be flourishing with micro-enterprises
and small businesses, mostly led by women. Technology, the massive game changer is
crushing barriers between geographies and cultures, and unifying businesses with the perfect
with the world, and employs a heightened awareness to the sensitivity of cross-cultural
especially starting a firm. This begs the question, what explains entrepreneurial intention?
People’s intentions have been considered consequences of their personal traits, demographic
background, cognitive make-up, and their context. Here we combine these approaches into a
two-level model to account for how intention is shaped by individual and cultural conditions
around the world. We hypothesize that intention is promoted by perceived capabilities, risk
propensity and awareness of opportunities, and that these are affected by demographic
attributes, especially formal education and entrepreneurial training, and by cultural context. We
use the GEM adult population survey in 2008 in all the 34 nations where people were asked
about their entrepreneurial training. We also use the World Values Survey in which national
culture is measured along two major dimensions, traditionality versus secular-rationalism and
materialism versus self-expressionism. The hypotheses are tested by regressions. We find that
and especially their perceived capabilities. This entrepreneurial mindset is variously shaped by
demographics, notable gender in the way that men more often than women consider
also shaped by their cultural context in the way that traditionality, more than secular-rationalistic
culture, promotes perceived capabilities, and also in the way that self-expressionism, more than
Social psychology offers strong models of behavioural intentions with significant demonstrated
predictive value for several behaviours. Such models offer sound hypothetical structures that
particularly delineate the procedures underlying intentional acts. Metaexaminations (Kim &
(states of mind) effectively predicts intentions.” Over an extensive variety of studies identifying a
wide range of behaviours and intentions to take part in those behaviour’s, attitudes explain more
than half of the changes in intentions. Intentions clarify at least 30% of the changes in
behaviour. Clarifying 30% of the difference in behaviour analyses positively to the 10% level and
is ordinarily clarified straightforwardly by quality measures or attitudes (Ajzen, 1987). More distal
marvels, for example, profession decisions will probably bring about a smaller effect. Still,
intentions remain a huge, unbiased indicator of career choice (Lent et al., 1994).
The theory of reasoned action (TRA) (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980)
generally asserts that “The central cause of an action/behaviour is the intention, more
specifically behavioural intention, that is, what one anticipates doing or not doing.” The intention,
on the other hand, is dictated by attitude (evaluation of the action/behaviour) and a subjective
norm (evaluation of other available options) (Trafimow, 2009). TRA is comprised of three
noteworthy constructs: (1) the behavioural intention that relies upon (2) subjective standards
(nor) (3) dispositions (attitudes). The more grounded the inspirational dispositions toward
conduct are and the more grounded the social standards toward conduct are, the more
Behavioural Intentions measures the quality of the intention to execute a predefined activity.
Subjective standards depict the weight by associates or companions to conform to standards. If,
assumptions about the outcomes of performing a predefined activity. Behavioural beliefs are
action/behaviour; normative beliefs on the other hand impact one’s subjective norm towards
The TPB (Ajzen, 1985) extends the limit of unadulterated volitional control indicated by the TRA.
This is accomplished by including convictions with respect to the ownership of essential assets
and opportunities to proceed with a given conduct. The more assets and opportunities people
think they have, the more prominent their apparent behavioural control over their conduct ought
to isolate these convictions and regard them as halfway autonomous determinants of conduct
(behaviour) (Madden et al., 1992). Marketing researchers, as well as social psychologists, have
fundamental research. Such reliable, vigorous and replicable ideal models have been generally
coupon use (Ajzen, 1987; Kim & Hunter, 1993). TPB distinguishes three attitudinal
predecessors of expectation. Two mirror the apparent attractive quality of playing out behaviour:
individual attitude toward results of the behaviour and perceived social standards/norms. The
third, perceived behavioural control reflects observations that the behaviour is individually
controllable. Perceived behavioural control reflects the apparent feasibility of playing out
behaviour and is accordingly identified with a view of situational competence (self-efficacy). TPB
Shapero’s model of the Entrepreneurial Event (SEE) is another important theory in the
entrepreneurship intentions world. It has been referred to as an implicit intention model specific
to the entrepreneurship domain (Krueger et al., 2000). In this model, the intention to venture into
business is said to be derived from the propensity to act upon opportunities, perceptions of its
attractiveness and lastly, likelihood of its success (Krueger et al., 2000). The model assumes
that “human behaviour is guided by inertia until an outside force interrupts that inertia.” The
interruption of the inertia can be due to positive events such winning a lottery (Shapero & Sokol,
1982). The interruptions trigger a change in behaviour and the victim is always forced to make
decisions that seek the best opportunity available. (Krueger et al., 2000) According to Shapero,
both feasible and desirable. Thus, entrepreneurial events require both in order for the desired
as a result of cultural, social and personal factors further, Shapero defines perceived desirability
as the attractiveness of starting a business, i.e., both intra and extra personal impacts and
defines perceived feasibility as the level to which one feels capable of venturing into the
entrepreneurship world. This is achieved empirically by using his proposed testable, eight-item,
inventory questions that aim at various aspects of perceived feasibility and desirability.
“People act on decisions based on their own personal disposition and thus reflect the aspects of
intentions.” Acting on an opportunity is highly dependent on control perceptions; the urge to gain
References: