- NAME TITLE OF OBJECTIVES DIMENSIONS/V RESEARC TIMING

OF THE THE ARIABLES H S

AUTHOR PAPER METHOD
1 Liza Internation To assess the Independent Qualitative 2012
estino al Journal employee variable:age and
diaoanis of performance ,gender. quantitative
p.h.d Economics appraisal system Dependent research
and and it’s effect on variable:performan methods
Manageme performance of ce
nt the employees
science
2. Gary E. Employee factors that Independent Descriptive 2003
Roberts Performanc attenuate the variable: employee analysis
e Appraisal effectiveness of engagement
System participation ,efficiency
Participatio including lack of ,effectiveness.
n training, absence Dependent
of rater variable:
accountability performance
strategies,sub- appraisals
ordinate
feedback etc.,
3. Gary Employee succinctly Workers self- Statistical 2002
E.Roberts performanc summarize the evaluation ,two- method
e appraisal key elements way
system that make communication,
participatio employee appraisal
n performance interview .
appraisal
participation an
essential
component of an
effective system
4. Francis O. Employee focused on Attitude and Descriptive Received:
Boachie- perception employees’ perception of survey Septembe
Mensah of perceptions of respondents design r 22, 2011
Aswin performanc performance research Accepted:
seidu .p e appraisal appraisal biases method October
systems or errors, and 11, 2011
examined the Published
implications for : January
developing and 16, 2012
implementing an
effective
appraisal
systems
5. Jill cook, Satisfaction  the inter‐ Compensation and Descriptive 1-july
alf with relationship between employee survey -2004
crossman performance a person's role as satisfaction method
appraisal appraisee and/or
systems appraiser in a
performance
appraisal system
(PAS) and level of
satisfaction
expressed with the
 system
6. CASCIO, W. IMPLICATIO Implications for Employee Graphical June
F., & NS OF personnel Productivity method 1981
BERNARDI PERFORMA
N, H. J NCE decision making ,efficiency
APPRAISAL ,effectiveness and
LITIGATION performance
FOR appraisals
PERSONNEL
DECISIONS
7. Angelo S. Performanc research on Performance and Trends 2006
DeNisi e performance satisfaction analysis
and Appraisal, appraisal and method
Robert D. Performanc performance
Pritchard1e management has
Manageme focused on
nt and measurement
Improving issues and
Individual accuracy
Performanc
e: A
Motivation
al
Framework
8. MK Employee study the Independent Questionnair 2014
Sanyala , Motivation performance variables: age, e method
SB Biswas from appraisal gender, motivation ,regression,c
Performanc process across from appraisal o-rrelation .
e Appraisal the IT process.
Implication industry,to find Dependent
s out variables :feedback
interrelationship intents
between the ,organisational
factors affecting commitment .
the employee
motivation.
9. Robert A due Problems Availability of Paired 1992
folger , process is associated with reliable and valid comparison
Mary A. metaphor test and political outcome analysis
konvsky,a for metaphors. measures method
nd Russell performanc ,knowledge of the
cropanzan e appraisal transformation
o process ,
10. Danielle Evoluation  Researcher and Performance Quantitative 1-
s.wiese , of the practitioner appraisals and their method september
M. Ronald performanc attention in satisfaction -1998
buckley e appraisal employee
performance
process appraisal
11. Paul SO, Modelling Therefore, this Rewards Survey 2015
Olumuyiw the study ,training research
a FO and Relationship concentrates on ,promotion effect mrthod
Esther OA between ‘what’, ‘why’ the comittement of
Performance
and ‘how’ as the employees
Appraisal
and
factors generate
Organization extreme
al dissatisfaction
 Productivity among
employees and
employers
12. Rabia Examining aims to examine Independent Sample December
Karimi the e the relationship variable survey 2011
,Muhamad Relationshi of employee :performance method
Imran p of performance appraisal system ,correlation ,
Malik ,Dr. Performanc appraisal system Dependent variable regression.
Saddam e Appraisal (PER) and :employee
Hussain System and employee satisfaction
Employee satisfaction
Satisfaction (SAT)
13. Salleh, M., Performanc to examine the Fairness of Sample Received
Amin, A., e appraisals perception of performance survey : 28
Muda, S., and public servants appraisal , methods october20
& Halim, organisatio towards the Satisfaction of ,statistical 12
M. A. S. nal fairness of performance methods Accepted:
A. commitmen performance appraisal , Novembe
t appraisal and its Organizational r 21, 2012
effect on commitment Published
organizational : January
commitment 28, 2013
14. Gabris, G. Does the relationship MPS Score ,MBI Sample June- 1-
T., & Performanc between Phase Level survey 2001
Ihrke, D. e Appraisal employee method ,
M. Contribute perceptions of correlation
to performance method
Heightened appraisal and
Levels of both employee
Employee performance and
Burnout? job satisfaction
15. B retz, R. The To improve Independent Correlation 1992
D., Current research on variables : and
Milkovich State of oerformance gender ,age regression
, G. T., & Performanc appraisal Dependent methods
Read, W. e Appraisal usefulness as a variables :
Research managerial performance and
and decision makig job analysis
Practice:
Concerns,
Directions,
and
Implication
s