Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hints For Selected Exercises: Exercise Q Q
Hints For Selected Exercises: Exercise Q Q
Exercise 1.3. It has to be shown that given any q ¢ r there exists a polynomial of
degree d - 1 vanishing on r but nonzero at q. There are many ways to do this, the
fastest being perhaps induction on d.
Exercise 1.11 (b). For what it's worth, the line Lp., v is given by the equations
Exercise 1.27. Show that the line IXZl - PZ2 meets the curve defined by zozi = Z~
exactly in the points [1,0, OJ and /1([P, IXJ); similarly for v.
Exercise 1.28. Observe that homogeneous polynomials of degree 3 on [p2 pull back
via v to homogeneous polynomials of degree 9 on [pi, and that this pullback map
cannot be an isomorphism.
Exercise 1.29. Observe that for [ZO, ... , Z3J = v([Xo, X1J), we have ZdZo =
Z3/Z2 = XdX o , giving us a quadratic polynomial vanishing on the image. Now
express Z2/Z0 and Z3/Zl in terms of these ratios to find two cubic polynomials
cutting out e ll • p'
Exercise 2.12. First, show that for a suitable choice of homogeneous coordinates
[Zl' ... , Z2kJ, any three mutually disjoint (k - I)-planes in [p2k-l can be taken
Hints for Selected Exercises 309
to be the planes (Xl = ... = X k = 0), (Xk+1 = ... = X 2k = 0) and (Xl = X k+1 = ... =
X k = X 2k ). For part (ii), use the fact that the Segre variaty is the zero locus of
quadratic polynomials.
Exercise 2.14. Probably the most efficient way to do this is simply to take P,
P' E pl, Q, Q' E p2 and show that any linear combination of a(P, Q) and a(P', Q')
lies in 1: 2, 1 only if P = P' or Q = Q'.
Exercise 2.19. Again, there are many ways to do this. One would be to observe that
of the two families of lines on the surface S, the members of one meet the curve C
exactly once each, while all but a finite number of the lines of the other family meet
C three times. This finite subset of the lines of one family generally consists of four
lines (if C is given by a bihomogeneous polynomial of bidegree (1, 3), this is the zero
locus of the discriminant of F with respect to the second variable), and so has a
cross-ratio.
Exercise 2.29 (last part). Observe that if the map qJ were so given, the inverse image
of most hyperplanes in p5 would be the zero locus of a bihomogeneous polynomial
of balanced bidegree, which is not the case.
Exercise 4.12 (parts (b) and (c)). The key fact is that the rank of a skew-symmetric
matrix is always even.
Exercise 4.13. One possible (and relatively elementary) way: first argue that it
is sufficient to do this for the family of conics {X2 + a y2 + bZ 2 } parametrized
by A,2. To see that this family cannot have a rational section, show that this
would entail a pair of rational functions Y(a, b), Z(a, b) satisfying the equation
ay2 + bZ 2 + 1 == 0, or equivalently four polynomials P, Q, R, S in a and b sat-
isfying (QS)2 + a' (PS)2 + b· (RQf == O. (There are other approaches that involve
more machinery but may provide more insight; for example, you can argue that
any five-dimensional subvariety of f!{ will meet the general fiber of f!{ ~ p5 in an
even number of points.)
Exercise 4.14. One possible way: choose points p and q E p3 such that the line pq
does not meet every member of the family. For any member Xb c: p3 of the family,
let Q be the (unique) quadric surface containing X b , p and q, 1 c: Q the line of the
ruling of Q whose members meet Xb once passing through p and r(b) = 1n Xb E X b.
Exercise 5.13. Use induction on d. For the second part, show that d ~ 2n + 1
points in p2 will fail to impose independent conditions on curves of degree n if and
only if n + 2 of them are collinear.
Exercise 6.16. It may be helpful to know that a line 1 c: p3 will meet the twisted
cubic C only if the restriction to 1 of the three quadrics cutting out Care
dependent; in this way we can write the equation of~l(C) as a 3 x 3 determinant.
310 Hints for Selected Exercises
Exercise 7.8. This can be done in exactly the same fashion as the proof of Proposi-
tion 7.16.
Exercise 8.2. Probably the most instructive way to do this is to use the construction
suggested in Exercise 6.18.
Exercise 8.6. This can be done directly by calculation; alternately, look at the
quadrics containing C U {p}.
Exercise 8.7. One way to crank this out would be to project from a point on the
rational normal curve C; the image of a point r E 1P4 will lie on a unique chord to
the image of C, and we can write out the condition that r itself lie on the corre-
sponding chord to C. A slicker way to do it would be to use the determinantal
description of C suggested in Example 1.16 (with k = 2), bearing in mind that a sum
of two rank 1 matrices can have rank at most 2.
Exercise 8.8. As in Exercise 8.7, this can be done by hand; but it is easier to
use the determinantal description of the Veronese surface given in Example 2.6.
Exercise 8.13. The union of the trisecant lines to Ca..fl is just the (unique) quadric
containing Ca.,fl'
Exercise 9.18. Count parameters; that is, compare the number of coefficients in a
polynomial of degree d to the number in a d x d matrix of linear forms.
Exercise 10.11. This can be done directly, but one approach is to use the determi-
nantal description of the rational normal curve described in Example 9.3.
Exercise 10.14. The answer is C and ~; the key ingredient in the solution is the
j-function.
Exercise 10.22. One way is to look at the discussion of Zariski tangent spaces in
Lecture 14.
(Note that the Zo in the lower right corner of the second determinant could be any
linear form.)
Exercise 11.19. To shvw the isomorphism of'll with the scroll X 2 ,2,l fix distinct
points q, r E 10 and a line M c [p3 disjoint from 10 and consider the images under
the Segre embedding of G(1, 3) x 10 of the three curves
{(lo, p)}PE1o
{(qs, q)}sEM
{(rs, r)}sEM'
Exercise 11.35. m = n is the smallest number; this is required for polynomials of
the form xn + x n- l (e.g., corresponding to points on a tangent line to the rational
normal curve).
Exercise 12.11. The key is to observe that the plane A in the construction is a
general (n - 2)-secant plane to the rational normal curve.
Exercise 12.13. You would expect a general cubic surface S to contain a one-
dimensional family of conics; it does because every conic on S is coplanar with a
line contained in S.
Exercise 12.25. Three of the skew lines will lie on a unique smooth quadric
Q~ [pl X [pI C [p3; the fourth line will in general meet this quadric in two distinct
points q, r and be determined by them. Check that the automorphism group of Q
fixing the three lines and the points q and r is one-dimensionaL
Exercise 12.26. The trick to look at the hyperplanes spanned by the lines pairwise.
The answer to the general question is "no", but I don't know an elementary proof.
Exercise 13.S. The genera are, respectively, -1,0,0, and 1. The interesting point
here is that the genera of three coplanar concurrent lines is different from that of
three noncoplanar concurrent lines; indeed, we will see in Lecture 14 that they are
not isomorphic varieties.
Exercise 13.13. For this (and the two following) use your knowledge of the Hilbert
function; e.g., if you want to show F l , ... , Fk E I (X) generate, show that
dim ((Sj(FI , ... , Fk))m) = hx(m).
Exercise 14.9. The fastest way to see that Y and Z are not isomorphic is by
comparing the codimension of the conductor ideals in their local rings at the
origin; alternatively, see the discussion of multiplicity in Lecture 20.
Exercise 15.5. This can be ground out directly; one shortcut might be to realize [p3
as the space of homogeneous cubic polynomials in two variables mod scalars, the
312 Hints for Selected Exercises
twisted cubic as the locus of cubes (as in Lecture 10) and show that the tangential
surface TC is the zero locus of the discriminant.
Exercise 15.6. If a general point of a general tangent line lrpX to X lay on more
than one tangent line, every tangent line to X would meet lrpX.
Exercise 15.18. Observe that fffll(X) is the locus oflines L such that the restriction
FIL of F to L has a multiple root for every polynomial F E J(X) in the ideal of X.
Exercise 15.19. The cone over an irreducible nondegenerate curve C c [plr for
r ~ 4 will in general have all strict inequalities.
Exercise 16.16. Consider the projection from the plane spanned by lrPl X, ... , lrp,X.
Exercise 17.21. This has to be done in two stages. Show that a general surface
containing C is smooth away from C (Bertini) and that it is smooth along C
(Bertini applied to the blow-up of [pl3 along C, plus other considerations).
Exercise 20.15. One way to do this (not the only way) is to deform the union of two
conic curves having a point of contact of order 3.
Exercise 20.17. (a), (b) and (c) are all quartic curves; (d) is a sex tic.
Hints for Selected Exercises 313
Exercise 22.1. If A = 0:» W for some W c V, show that Q' is given by the composi-
tion
W -4 V -4 V* -4 W*
where the middle map is Q.
Exercise 22.35. For the first part, observe that a general two-plane in o:»N = 0:»5 will
meet <1>2 in a smooth cubic curve and miss <1>1 altogether; take L a flex line to this
cubic in such a plane. What does the corresponding family of plane conics look
like?
Exercise 22.39. The quartic with a tacnode occurs when P is a smooth point of one
of the four singular quadrics in the pencil containing X; the double conic when P
is a vertex of one of those quadrics.
References
Basic Sources
[AM] Atiyah, M. F., and MacDonald, I. G. Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-
Wesley, 1969.
[E] Eisenbud, D. Commutative Algebra, in press.
[EH] Eisenbud, D., and Harris, J. Schemes: the Language of Modern Algebraic Geometry,
Wadsworth,1992.
[F] Fulton, W. Algebraic Curves, W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1969.
[GH] Griffiths, P. and Harris, J. Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley and Sons, 1978.
[H] Hartshorne, R. Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-
Verlag, 1977.
[M] Mumford, D. Algebraic Geometry I: Complex Projective Varieties, Grundlehren der
math. Wissenschaften 221, Springer-Verlag, 1976.
[M1] Mumford, D. Red Book, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1358,
1988.
[SR] Semple, J., and Roth, L. Introduction to Algebraic Geometry, Oxford Univ. Press,
1949.
[S] Serre, J.-P. "Faisceaux Algebriques Coherent," Annals of Math, 61, 1955, 197-278.
[Sh] Shararevich, I. Basic Algebraic Geometry, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.
Specific References
[A] Ahlfors, L. Complex Analysis, McGraw-Hili, 1953.
[BM] Borel, A., and Moore, J. "Homology theory for locally compact spaces." Michigan
Math. J., 7,1960,137-159.
[BK] Brieskorn, E., and Knorrer, H. Plane Algebraic Curves, Birkhauser Boston, 1981.
[C] Coolidge, J. A Treatise on Algebraic Plane Curves, Dover, 1931.
[CG] Clemens, H., and Griffiths, P. "The intermediate Jacobian of a cubic threefold."
Annals of Math., 95,1972,281-356.
References 315
[D] Donagi, R. "On the geometry of Grassmannians." Duke Math. J., 44,1977,795-837.
[Ein] Ein, L. "Varieties with small dual varieties." Invent. Math., 86, 1986, 63-74.
[El] Eisenbud, D. "Linear sections of determinantal varieties." Am. Jour. Math., 110,
1988,541-575.
[Fl] Fulton, W. Intersection Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1984.
[FH] Fulton, W., and Harris, J. Representation Theory: A First Course, Springer-Verlag,
1991.
[FL] Fulton, W., and Lazarsfeld, R. "Connectivity and its applications in algebraic geom-
etry." In Algebraic Geometry, A. Lidgober and P. Wagreich (Eds.), Springer-Verlag
Lecture Notes in Mathematics 862,1981,26-92.
[GHl] Griffiths, P., and Harris, J. "Algebraic geometry and local differential geometry."
Ann. Ec. Norm. Sup. 4" serie, 12 (1979),355-432.
[GLP] Gruson, L., Lazarsfed, R., and Peskine, C. "On a theorem of Caste1nuovo, and the
equations defining space curves," Invent. Math., 72, 1983, 491-506.
[GM] Green, M., and Morrison, I. "The equations defining Chow varieties." Duke Math.
J., 53, 1986, 733-747.
[Hi] Hironaka, H. "Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of
characteristic 0," Annals of Math., 79, 1964, I: 109-203; II: 205-326.
[Hil] Hironaka, H. "Triangulations of algebraic sets." In Algebraic Geometry, Arcata,
1974, AMS Proc. Symp. Pure Math, 29,1975,165-184.
[1M] Iskovskih, V. A., and Manin, Ju. I. "Three-dimensional quartics and counterexam-
ples to the Liiroth problem." Math USSR-Sbornik, 15, 1971, 141-166.
[JLP] J6sefiak, T., Lascoux, A., and Pragacz, P. "Classes of determinantal varieties asso-
ciated with symmetric and skew-symmetric matrices." Math. USSR Izv., 18, 1982,
575-586.
[K] Kleiman, S. "The Enumerative Theory of Singularities." In Real and Complex
Singularities, Oslo 1976, P. Holm (Ed.), Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1977,297 -396.
[Kl] Kleiman, S. "The transversality of a general translate." Composition Math., 28, 1974,
287-297.
[L] Lawson, H. B. "Algebraic cycles and homotopy theory." Annals of Maths., 129,
1989,253-291.
[MM] Mumford, D., and Morrison, I. "Stability of projective varieties." l'Enseign. Math.,
24, 1977, 39-110.
[Ml] Mumford, D. Lectures on Curves on an Algebraic Surface Annals of Math. Studies,
59, Princeton Univ. Press, 1966.
[P] Pinkham, H. "A Caste1nuovo bound for smooth surfaces," Invent. Math., 83, 1986,
321-332.
[SI] Serre, J.-P. Groupes Algebriques et Corps de Classe, Hermann, 1959.
[S2] Serre, J.-P. "Geometrie algebrique et geometrie analytique," Ann. Inst. Fourier,
Grenoble, 6, 1956, 1-42.
[W] Wilson, G. "Hilbert's sixteenth problem." Topology, 17, 1978,53-73.
Index
Note: Where there are several entries under a given heading, the ones giving the definition
of an object or the statement of a theorem are indicated by italic numbers
A B
action (of a group), 116 base (of a family), 41
examples of, 100, 116-123, 125-129, 161, base locus (of a pencil), 301
280 Bertini's theorem, 216, 218, 231, 234, 244
affine Betti numbers, 173
coordinates, 4 Bezouttheorem,173,227,228,237,248
space, 3 bidegree, 27
tangent space, 175 bihomogeneous polynomial, 27
variety, 3 binary quantic, 120
algebraic group, 114 birational, 77
dimensions of, 138 isomorphism, 77
examples of, 114, 115, 116 isomorphism with hypersurface, 79
analytic isomorphism with smooth variety, 219,
coordinates, 187 264
topology, 17 map, 77
variety, 8, 77, 175 examples, 157, 288; see also rational
area of a variety, 227 maps
arithmetic genus, 167, 173 bitangent lines, 195
associated curve, 214 blowing down, 84; see also blowing down
tangent line to, 214 blowing up, 81,82
associated map, 214 examples of, 84, 85, 86, 92,192, 220-221,
automorphism group, 116 254,259,277,288,298
of Grassmannians, 122 Nash,221
of projective space, 228 resolving rational maps by, 84
318 Index
L
Lefschetz principle, 176, 187, 204 N
lemniscate, 264 Nakayama'a lemma, 179
I-generic matrix, 102 Nash blow-up, 221
lima~on, 263 nodal plane cubic, 15, 36~37, 54~55, 79,
lines, 5, 9 220,221
families of, 47,63 node, 220, 260
on a general surface, 152 Noetherian
incident, 69 ring, 57, 58
meeting four lines, 245~246 topology, 18
Index 323