Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NVMI Denial
NVMI Denial
Action Proposed:
Staff recommends denial of the renewal petition for North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory
Academy (“Charter School”), located in Board District 6 and Local District Northeast, for five (5) years,
beginning July 1, 2018 until June 30, 2023, to serve 725 students in grades 4-12 in year one, and up to 915
students in grades 4-12 by the end of the charter term, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact In Support
of Denial of the Charter Petition for North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy.
Background:
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy is a 6-12 independent charter school currently
serving 610 students on the campus of Sun Valley High School, as a co-location at 12105 Allegheny Street, Sun
Valley, CA 91352 in Board District 6 and Local District Northeast. Charter School was initially approved by the
LAUSD Board of Education on March 25, 2003 as Imagine Academy Charter. During the 2005-06 academic
year, the school underwent a name change from Imagine Academy Charter to North Valley Charter Academy
(NOVA) and was renewed on June 24, 2008. Upon its second renewal on January 15, 2013, Charter School
submitted its petition under the name of North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy.
On September 13, 2017, North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy submitted its charter
renewal petition application to the Charter Schools Division. The 60-day statutory timeline for Board action on
this renewal petition runs through November 12, 2017.
Based on a comprehensive review of the charter petition application and the record of performance of North
Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy, staff has determined that the charter school has not met
the requirements set forth in Education Code 47605 and therefore recommends denial of the renewal petition.
Statutory Framework
Education Code section 47605(b) sets forth grounds for denying a charter petition. Section 47605(b) states that
"[t]he governing board of the school district shall grant a charter for the operation of a school under this part if
it is satisfied that granting the charter is consistent with sound educational practice. The governing board of the
school district shall not deny a petition for the establishment of a charter school unless it makes written factual
findings, specific to the particular petition, setting forth specific facts to support one or more of the following
findings:
(1) The charter school presents an unsound educational program for the pupils to be enrolled in the charter
school.
(2) The petitioners are demonstrably unlikely to successfully implement the program set forth in the
Los Angeles Unified School District Page 1 of 4 Printed on 10/26/2017
powered by Legistar™
889
File #: Rep-182-17/18, Version: 1
(2) The petitioners are demonstrably unlikely to successfully implement the program set forth in the
petition.
(3) The petition does not contain the number of signatures required by subdivision (a) [of section 47605].
(4) The petition does not contain an affirmation of each of the conditions described in subdivision (d) [of
section 47605].
(5) The petition does not contain reasonably comprehensive descriptions of all of the [fifteen elements set
forth in section 47605, subdivision (b) (5)].
(6) The petition does not contain a declaration of whether or not the charter school shall be deemed the
exclusive public employer of the employees of the charter school for purposes of Chapter 10.7
(commencing with Section 3540) of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code.” (Ed. Code § 47605,
subd. (b).)
(1) Petitioners are demonstrably unlikely to successfully implement the educational program set forth in the
petition.
(2) The charter school presents an unsound educational program for the pupils to be enrolled in the charter
school.
(3) The petition does not contain reasonably comprehensive descriptions of all of the fifteen elements
required in a charter school petition.
Due Diligence
Current North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy governing board members did not
complete questionnaires regarding conflicts of interest. A due diligence review of the charter school and its
governing organization, school leader, and on-site financial manager, was not performed by the Office of the
Inspector General because the requisite information was not submitted by Charter School.
The petition is available for perusal in the Charter Schools Division and online at the District’s Board of
Education website at <http://laschoolboard.org/charterpetitions>.
Expected Outcomes:
Denial will prevent the Charter School from continuing its operations as a charter school under the terms of the
renewal petition.
“No” If the Board does not adopt the recommendation of denial of the charter petition and the attached
Findings of Fact in Support of Denial of the Charter Petition for North Valley Military Institute College
Preparatory Academy, and instead takes specific action to approve the renewal charter petition, North Valley
Military Institute College Preparatory Academy would be authorized to continue operating as a charter school
under the terms of the approved renewal petition for a five (5) year period beginning July 1, 2018. Within 30
days, the Board requires that the school submit to the Charter Schools Division a revised renewal charter
petition that meets all LAUSD requirements, including but not limited to a reasonably comprehensive
description of all fifteen required elements and compliance with current District Required Language.
Policy Implications:
There are no policy implications at this time.
Budget Impact:
The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and various other income sources of the District are reduced when
current District students enroll at a charter school, and corresponding reduction in expenditures may not occur
in such cases. If the Board adopts staff recommendation of denial of the petition, the action will not have a
budget impact. If the Board does not adopt the staff denial recommendation and the petition is approved, the
impact on the budget will be commensurate with the terms of the specific Special Education Local Plan Area
(SELPA) MOU (Option 1, 2, or 3) executed by the charter school and the District.
Student Impact:
As stated in the Board of Education’s Policy on Charter School Authorizing, “[W]hen the Board of Education
authorizes a charter school, it establishes a partnership to advance its vision and mission and to accelerate gains
in academic achievement and accountability for all of its students and public schools (Policy, p.1).” Based on a
comprehensive review and assessment of Charter School’s renewal petition application and its record of
performance, staff has determined that Charter School has not met the requirements for charter school renewal
and therefore recommends denial of the renewal petition. Please see Attachment A.
Attachments:
Staff Assessment and Recommendation Report with Data Set
Findings of Fact In Support of Denial of the Charter Petition for North Valley Military Institute College
Preparatory Academy.
Informatives:
Not applicable
PROPOSED N/A
BENCHMARKS:
Page 1 of 13
893
STAFF ASSESSMENT
I. ACTION PROPOSED
Staff recommends denial of the renewal petition for North Valley Military Institute College
Preparatory Academy (“NVMI” or “Charter School”), located in Board District 6 and Local District
Northeast, for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2018, until June 30, 2023, to serve 725 students in
grades 4-12 in year one, and up to 915 students in grades 4-12 by the end of the charter term.
A. School History
Most Recent The charter, submitted as North Valley Military Institute College
Renewal Preparatory Academy, was renewed on January 15, 2013, to serve
up to 192 students in grades 6-12.
Page 2 of 13
894
B. Educational Program
Page 3 of 13
895
C. Student Population
Socio- economically
American Indian or
Native Hawaiian or
Black or African
English Learner
Pacific Islander
Disadvantaged
Students with
Alaska Native
Foster Youth
Two or More
Enrollment
Disabilities
Homeless
American
F/R Meal
Filipino
Races
GATE
Latino
White
Asian
School
Page 4 of 13
896
a. Summary
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy’s comparative performance
on the CAASPP (SBAC) from 2015-2016 to 2016-2017 reflects a 10.16 percentage point
increase of students who Met or Exceeded performance standards in English Language Arts
(ELA) and a 1.93 percentage point decrease of students who Met or Exceeded performance
standards in Math. Its 2016-2017 CAASPP (SBAC) results show levels of academic
performance that are below the Resident Schools Median and Similar Schools Median in
English Language Arts (ELA) and in Mathematics. Please see attached North Valley
Military College Preparatory Academy Data Set.
Page 5 of 13
897
Students with
Students with
Combined %
Combined %
Met/Exceeds
Met/Exceeds
% Standard
% Standard
% Standard
% Standard
% Standard
% Standard
Nearly Met
Nearly Met
% Exceeds
% Exceeds
Standard,
Standard,
Subgroup
Standard
Standard
from 2016-
Not Met
Not Met
Scores
Scores
Met
Met
School 17
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy All Students 324 69.00 20.00 10.00 1.00 11.00 345 57.10 21.74 15.36 5.80 21.16 10.16
American Indian or Alaska
1 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Native
Asian 2 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
English Learner 73 93.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 77 90.91 7.79 1.30 0.00 1.30 0.30
Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Homeless -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Latino 302 70.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 11.00 327 58.10 22.02 15.29 4.59 19.88 8.88
Native Hawaiian or Pacific
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Islander
Socioeconomically
280 69.00 21.00 9.00 1.00 10.00 318 58.18 22.33 14.78 4.72 19.50 9.50
Disadvantaged
Students with Disabilities 69 91.00 6.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 76 77.63 13.16 7.89 1.32 9.21 6.21
White 7 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Similar Schools Median All Students 157 16.50 27.50 39.00 15.00 55.00 179 16.53 26.55 35.20 18.31 56.38 1.38
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE All Students 471 23.50 29.00 33.00 11.00 44.50 459 27.34 27.42 27.41 10.94 35.56 -8.94
Students with
Combined %
Combined %
Met/Exceeds
Met/Exceeds
% Standard
% Standard
% Standard
% Standard
% Standard
% Standard
Nearly Met
Nearly Met
% Exceeds
% Exceeds
Standard,
Standard,
Subgroup
Standard
Standard
from 2016-
Not Met
Not Met
Scores
Scores
Met
Met
School 17
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy All Students 325 72.00 21.00 6.00 2.00 8.00 346 72.83 21.10 5.20 0.87 6.07 -1.93
American Indian or Alaska
1 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Native
Asian 2 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
English Learner 73 96.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77 93.51 6.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Homeless -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Latino 303 74.00 19.00 5.00 2.00 7.00 328 74.39 20.73 4.57 0.30 4.88 -2.12
Native Hawaiian or Pacific
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Islander
Socioeconomically
281 73.00 20.00 6.00 1.00 7.00 319 73.67 21.63 4.39 0.31 4.70 -2.30
Disadvantaged
Students with Disabilities 69 90.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76 86.84 11.84 1.32 0.00 1.32 1.32
White 7 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Similar Schools Median All Students 163 46.50 30.00 18.50 4.50 22.50 177 50.00 28.87 16.98 4.42 20.49 -2.01
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE Median All Students 467 52.50 30.00 13.50 4.00 18.00 455 52.62 27.55 11.86 4.57 18.55 0.55
Note: 2015 and 2016 achievement level percentages were reported to the nearest whole number. Beginning in
2017, achievement level percentages were reported to the nearest hundredths.
Page 6 of 13
898
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy’s reclassification criteria are
as follows:
Page 7 of 13
899
Reclass Rate
Reclass Rate
Reclass Rate
Reclass #
Reclass #
Reclass #
13-14
14-15
14-15
14-15
15-16
15-16
15-16
16-17
16-17
EL #
EL #
EL #
School
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy has 17.6% of its English
Learners identified as Long Term English Learners (LTELs), which is higher than the
Resident Schools Median of 12.2% and Similar Schools Median of 12.1%. In addition, the
charter school has 0.6% of its English Learners identified as “At-Risk” of becoming
LTELs, based on the CDE’s 2016-17 “At-Risk” and Long-Term English Learners (LTEL)
report.
English Learners
EL 4+ Years RFEP RFEP Total
School EL EL At-Risk At-Risk LTEL LTEL EL 4+ Years
Not At-Risk Number Percent (Ever-EL)
0-3 Years 0-3 Years 4-5 Years 4-5 Years 6+ Years 6+ Years Not At-Risk
or LTEL
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent or LTEL
Percent
North Valley Military Institute College
18 5.1% 2 0.6% 62 17.6% 35 9.9% 236 66.9% 353
Preparatory Academy
Similar Schools Median 20 3.1% 3 0.3% 52 12.1% 17 3.8% 412 78.7% 483
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE Median 37 4.5% 4 0.7% 107 12.2% 47 5.6% 489 73.7% 708
Page 8 of 13
900
Graduation Rate
Graduation Rate
Graduation Rate
2015-16 cohort
Change from
Number of
Subgroup
students
2015-16
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
School
2015-2016 2016-2017
Annual Oversight Evaluation Report Rating in Category of 2 2
Student Achievement and Educational Performance Developing Developing
*Note: The annual oversight rating represents the Charter Schools Division staff evaluation of the school’s performance as
outlined in the Annual Performance-Based Oversight Visit Report on or about the date of the annual oversight visit.
h. Additional Information
None
2. Governance
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy has achieved the rating of
Proficient in the category of Governance on its annual oversight evaluation reports for the last
two years.
2015-2016 2016-2017
Annual Oversight Evaluation Report Rating in Category of 3 3
Governance Proficient Proficient
*Note: The annual oversight rating represents the Charter Schools Division staff evaluation of the school’s performance as
outlined in the Annual Performance-Based Oversight Visit Report on or about the date of the annual oversight visit.
a. Summary
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy has achieved the ratings of
Unsatisfactory and Proficient in the category of Organizational Management, Programs,
and Operations on its annual oversight evaluation reports for the last two years. The
unsatisfactory rating in 2015-16 was due to compliance issues related to clearances and
credentialing. The school immediately addressed all concerns and resolved all issues
related to this.
Page 9 of 13
901
2015-2016 2016-2017
Annual Oversight Evaluation Report Rating in Category of 1 3
Organizational Management, Programs, and Operations Unsatisfactory Proficient
*Note: The annual oversight rating represents the Charter Schools Division staff evaluation of the school’s performance as outlined
in the Annual Performance-Based Oversight Visit Report on or about the date of the annual oversight visit.
2016-17 SUBGROUPS
2016-17 AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENTS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITY
# Events 2016-17
Susp. Event Rate
# Days 2016-17
Rate 2014-15
Rate 2015-16
Susp. Event
Susp. Event
Susp. Event
Single Std.
Single Std.
# Enrolled
# Enrolled
# Enrolled
# Events
2016-17
2016-17
2016-17
Susp. %
# Days
Rate
School
Socio- economically
Native Hawaiian or
Black or African
English Learner
Pacific Islander
Disadvantaged
Students with
Alaska Native
Foster Youth
Enrollment
Disabilities
Homeless
American
F/R Meal
Filipino
GATE
Latino
White
Asian
School
d. Special Education
According to the 2016 CASEMIS report, North Valley Military Institute College
Preparatory Academy has a 16.69% special education enrollment, which is slightly
higher than the Resident Schools Median of 15.60%. The CSD has conferred with staff
Page 10 of 13
902
in the Division of Special Education and found that IEP timelines and service tracking
continue to be issues. The Division of Special Education staff has provided on-site
support multiple times and continues to assist the school as needed.
OCT 2016
Incidence
Incidence
Enroll #
Enroll %
Enroll #
# DEAF
# OHI*
# SLD*
% High
# HOH
# EMD
% Low
# SLI*
# AUT
# TBI
Sp Ed
Sp Ed
# MR
# DB
# ED
# OI
# VI
School
e. Additional Information
None
4. Fiscal Operations
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory’ s record of performance and related
information demonstrate that the school has had negative net assets for the last two years
and net loss for the last four years. The school has unresolved fiscal operations issues in
this category. Please see the Findings of Fact in Support of Denial of the Renewal Petition
for North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory for further detail.
a. Summary
North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory (NVMI) has achieved the ratings of
Developing and Unsatisfactory in the category of Fiscal Operations on its annual oversight
evaluation reports for the last two years.
During the 2016-2017 oversight visit, the CSD noted that the school had been continuously
cited for not having clear and thorough Fiscal Policies with clearly written guidelines in
some fiscal areas. NVMI revised its Fiscal Policies, which were approved by its governing
board on May 25, 2017. The revised Fiscal Policies have not addressed all the areas
identified in 2016-2017 oversight report. Examples of the areas noted for further
improvement that are not included in NVMI’s current Fiscal Policies include:
Page 11 of 13
903
2015-2016 2016-2017
Annual Oversight Evaluation Report 2 1
Rating in Category of Fiscal Operations Developing Unsatisfactory
*Note: The annual oversight rating represents the Charter Schools Division staff evaluation of the school’s performance
as outlined in the Annual Performance-Based Oversight Visit Report on or about the date of the annual oversight
visit.
b. Fiscal Condition
NVMI’s fiscal condition is weak and has been downward trending since the 2012-2013
fiscal year. According to the 2015-2016 independent audit report, the school had negative
net assets of ($1,010,884) and net loss of ($727,973). The 2016-2017 Unaudited Actuals
project negative net assets of and net income. See additional information under the Other
Significant Fiscal Information section below.
Page 12 of 13
904
The CSD issued a Notice of Concern dated December 7, 2016, requiring that NVMI
provide monthly financial reports for monitoring purposes. The Notice of Concern also
required that the school provide supporting documents to the CSD, in order to demonstrate
immediate sources of revenue necessary to maintain a viable budget or financial plan. The
documentation provided by NVMI did not support the full amount of school-site
fundraising revenues and donations budgeted by the school. As a result, the CSD issued a
Notice to Cure on August 1, 2017.
Please see the Findings of Fact in Support of Denial of the Renewal Petition for North
Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy for further details.
C. Does the Petition Contain the Required Affirmations, Assurances, and Declarations?
This criterion has not been determined to be a finding.
Page 13 of 13
905
Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Homeless -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Latino 302 70.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 11.00 327 58.10 22.02 15.29 4.59 19.88 8.88
Native Hawaiian or
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Pacific Islander
Socioeconomically
280 69.00 21.00 9.00 1.00 10.00 318 58.18 22.33 14.78 4.72 19.50 9.50
Disadvantaged
Students with
69 91.00 6.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 76 77.63 13.16 7.89 1.32 9.21 6.21
Disabilities
Two or More Races 4 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
White 7 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Similar Schools
E 2 8729 Abraham Lincoln Senior High All Students 171 16.00 23.00 37.00 23.00 60.00 179 20.11 27.37 35.20 17.32 52.51 -7.49
0 0 7750 Academy of Environmental & Social Policy All Students 24 17.00 33.00 46.00 4.00 50.00 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
XR 2 8823 Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High All Students 106 7.00 13.00 32.00 48.00 80.00 117 3.42 17.09 31.62 47.86 79.49 -0.51
XR 2 8626 Alliance Gertz-Ressler Richard Merkin 6-12 Complex All Students 571 17.00 27.00 39.00 17.00 56.00 557 20.11 27.29 36.45 16.16 52.60 -3.40
XR 1 8825 Alliance Ouchi-O'Donovan 6-12 Complex All Students 581 30.00 31.00 29.00 10.00 39.00 586 26.45 26.11 32.08 15.36 47.44 8.44
XR 2 8827 Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High All Students 141 10.00 24.00 42.00 24.00 66.00 149 11.41 32.21 30.20 26.17 56.38 -9.62
XR 7 8504 Animo Pat Brown All Students 143 6.00 17.00 48.00 29.00 77.00 147 14.97 16.33 38.10 30.61 68.71 -8.29
NE 6 8609 Arleta High All Students 319 12.00 22.00 49.00 18.00 67.00 363 16.53 26.72 39.12 17.63 56.75 -10.25
XR 5 7733 Aspire Pacific Academy All Students 239 31.00 29.00 34.00 6.00 40.00 205 24.88 28.78 38.05 8.29 46.34 6.34
E 5 8536 Bell Senior High All Students 535 18.00 29.00 40.00 12.00 52.00 628 13.38 21.82 37.10 27.71 64.81 12.81
XR 2 8570 Camino Nuevo Charter High All Students 74 23.00 28.00 38.00 11.00 49.00 95 16.84 26.32 29.47 27.37 56.84 7.84
XR 6 8605 Discovery Charter Preparatory School #2 All Students 83 35.00 24.00 29.00 12.00 41.00 49 38.78 22.45 20.41 18.37 38.78 -2.22
E 2 8606 Esteban Torres East LA Performing Arts Magnet All Students 114 30.00 37.00 29.00 4.00 33.00 75 16.00 37.33 29.33 17.33 46.67 13.67
C 2 8774 Contreras Learning Center-Los Angeles School of Global Studies All Students 59 10.00 34.00 47.00 8.00 55.00 77 24.68 29.87 35.06 10.39 45.45 -9.55
E 5 8882 Maywood Academy High All Students 309 13.00 32.00 39.00 16.00 55.00 241 15.77 29.05 40.25 14.94 55.19 0.19
S 7 8779 Nathaniel Narbonne Senior High All Students 471 27.00 25.00 34.00 15.00 49.00 475 25.68 33.47 28.42 12.42 40.84 -8.16
C 2 8206 School for the Visual Arts and Humanities All Students 67 16.00 24.00 46.00 13.00 59.00 71 18.31 23.94 39.44 18.31 57.75 -1.25
906
Note: 2015 and 2016 achievement level percentages were reported to the nearest whole number. Beginning in 2017, achievement level percentages were reported to the nearest hundredths.
Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Homeless -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Latino 303 74.00 19.00 5.00 2.00 7.00 328 74.39 20.73 4.57 0.30 4.88 -2.12
Native Hawaiian or
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Pacific Islander
Socioeconomically
281 73.00 20.00 6.00 1.00 7.00 319 73.67 21.63 4.39 0.31 4.70 -2.30
Disadvantaged
Students with
69 90.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76 86.84 11.84 1.32 0.00 1.32 1.32
Disabilities
Two or More Races 4 * * * 4.00 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
White 7 * * * * -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Similar Schools
E 2 8729 Abraham Lincoln Senior High All Students 182 43.00 24.00 20.00 13.00 33.00 177 49.15 24.29 14.69 11.86 26.55 -6.45
0 0 7750 Academy of Environmental & Social Policy All Students 24 58.00 42.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
XR 2 8823 Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High All Students 106 23.00 20.00 31.00 26.00 57.00 116 12.93 27.59 36.21 23.28 59.48 2.48
XR 2 8626 Alliance Gertz-Ressler Richard Merkin 6-12 Complex All Students 571 33.00 36.00 21.00 11.00 32.00 554 36.10 34.30 19.31 10.29 29.60 -2.40
XR 1 8825 Alliance Ouchi-O'Donovan 6-12 Complex All Students 580 52.00 29.00 14.00 5.00 19.00 585 51.11 28.55 15.38 4.96 20.34 1.34
XR 2 8827 Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High All Students 141 45.00 31.00 20.00 4.00 24.00 149 54.36 24.16 18.12 3.36 21.48 -2.52
XR 7 8504 Animo Pat Brown All Students 143 24.00 42.00 24.00 10.00 34.00 147 37.41 28.57 25.17 8.84 34.01 0.01
NE 6 8609 Arleta High All Students 319 39.00 35.00 19.00 7.00 26.00 371 49.33 30.19 16.98 3.50 20.49 -5.51
XR 5 7733 Aspire Pacific Academy All Students 238 45.00 32.00 18.00 5.00 23.00 209 31.58 35.41 22.97 10.05 33.01 10.01
E 5 8536 Bell Senior High All Students 532 48.00 34.00 14.00 3.00 17.00 613 38.34 28.87 24.31 8.48 32.79 15.79
XR 2 8570 Camino Nuevo Charter High All Students 72 67.00 21.00 11.00 1.00 12.00 95 63.16 26.32 8.42 2.11 10.53 -1.47
XR 6 8605 Discovery Charter Preparatory School #2 All Students 75 44.00 27.00 25.00 4.00 29.00 49 67.35 22.45 8.16 2.04 10.20 -18.80
E 2 8606 Esteban Torres East LA Performing Arts Magnet All Students 115 63.00 32.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 74 50.00 29.73 17.57 2.70 20.27 16.27
C 2 8774 Contreras Learning Center-Los Angeles School of Global Studies All Students 59 51.00 29.00 14.00 7.00 21.00 77 62.34 29.87 7.79 0.00 7.79 -13.21
E 5 8882 Maywood Academy High All Students 306 51.00 30.00 14.00 6.00 20.00 240 58.33 29.17 10.42 2.08 12.50 -7.50
S 7 8779 Nathaniel Narbonne Senior High All Students 470 38.00 30.00 22.00 10.00 32.00 471 42.89 32.06 19.96 5.10 25.05 -6.95
C 2 8206 School for the Visual Arts and Humanities All Students 67 55.00 22.00 19.00 3.00 22.00 71 57.75 25.35 14.08 2.82 16.90 -5.10
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy All Students 119 45.00 30.00 21.00 4.00 25.00 113 31.86 41.59 22.12 4.42 26.55 1.55
E 5 8881 South East High All Students 413 49.00 32.00 18.00 1.00 19.00 461 51.84 28.85 14.97 4.34 19.31 0.31
908
Percentages
American Native Socio-
Black or Students Two or
Loc F/R Indian or English Foster Hawaiian or economically
LD BD School Enrollment GATE Asian African Filipino Homeless Latino with More White
Code Meal Alaska Learner Youth Pacific Disadvant-
American Disabilities Races
Native Islander aged
XR 6 8106 North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy 593 86.8 0.0 0.3 0.7 1.5 19.7 0.0 1.0 4.7 85.8 0.0 89.9 19.2 0.7 2.2
Similar Schools
E 2 8729 Abraham Lincoln Senior High 1,005 92.9 18.7 0.4 22.9 1.3 16.9 0.3 0.5 2.6 73.2 0.0 93.9 15.7 0.2 1.4
0 0 7750 Academy of Environmental & Social Policy 216 91.2 11.6 0.9 4.2 2.3 15.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 90.3 0.0 92.1 19.0 0.0 1.9
XR 2 8823 Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High 439 94.5 10.7 0.0 0.7 0.5 12.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 98.4 0.0 96.4 8.4 0.0 0.5
XR 2 8626 Alliance Gertz-Ressler Richard Merkin 6-12 Complex 986 95.3 15.9 0.1 0.1 1.1 12.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 98.6 0.0 97.0 9.9 0.0 0.1
XR 1 8825 Alliance Ouchi-O'Donovan 6-12 Complex 1,010 94.9 14.8 0.1 0.1 6.3 20.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.4 0.0 96.6 8.0 0.0 0.1
XR 2 8827 Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High 620 94.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 11.5 0.0 0.3 2.4 99.2 0.0 95.6 10.2 0.0 0.3
XR 7 8504 Animo Pat Brown 612 97.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 11.6 0.0 0.0 2.9 98.9 0.0 98.4 9.5 0.0 0.0
NE 6 8609 Arleta High 1,434 82.0 13.2 0.1 0.5 0.8 14.3 1.3 0.8 1.7 94.6 0.1 87.6 13.1 0.1 2.5
XR 5 7733 Aspire Pacific Academy 441 92.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 14.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 99.1 0.0 93.4 10.4 0.0 0.0
E 5 8536 Bell Senior High 2,953 89.6 21.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 13.8 0.1 0.5 2.5 96.4 0.0 91.9 9.3 0.0 2.8
XR 2 8570 Camino Nuevo Charter High 357 94.4 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.3 24.1 0.6 0.3 2.8 95.5 0.0 95.8 8.4 0.0 0.3
XR 6 8605 Discovery Charter Preparatory School #2 243 93.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 21.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 99.6 0.0 95.1 14.4 0.0 0.0
E 2 8606 Esteban Torres East LA Performing Arts Magnet 424 88.0 15.6 0.5 0.0 3.5 12.0 0.0 0.5 3.3 93.9 0.0 90.8 16.7 0.0 2.1
C 2 8774 Contreras Learning Center-Los Angeles School of Global Studies 340 93.2 10.3 0.3 1.2 1.2 25.3 0.3 0.3 7.4 96.5 0.0 95.6 8.8 0.3 0.3
E 5 8882 Maywood Academy High 1,354 89.1 15.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 17.7 0.1 0.3 1.0 99.0 0.1 91.6 16.7 0.0 0.5
S 7 8779 Nathaniel Narbonne Senior High 2,367 84.3 17.6 0.2 2.1 20.7 8.4 6.0 1.0 3.3 63.2 1.7 85.3 11.7 0.8 4.9
C 2 8206 School for the Visual Arts and Humanities 452 87.2 11.5 0.4 7.7 1.5 25.7 1.5 0.2 3.1 86.9 0.2 89.2 14.6 0.2 1.3
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy 526 90.3 14.8 0.2 0.2 1.5 9.5 0.0 0.8 5.9 95.8 0.0 92.0 10.3 0.2 2.1
E 5 8881 South East High 2,121 90.3 16.9 0.2 0.1 1.7 15.0 0.0 0.6 3.3 97.3 0.0 92.6 10.7 0.0 0.6
E 5 8871 South Gate Senior High 2,832 86.4 14.9 0.3 0.1 1.3 12.1 0.1 0.4 3.5 97.4 0.0 88.2 11.4 0.1 0.5
Similar Schools Median 616 92.0 14.0 0.2 0.1 1.2 14.5 0.1 0.4 2.6 96.5 0.0 93.0 10.6 0.0 0.5
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE
NE 6 7658 Sylmar Biotech Health Academy 288 99.3 12.5 0.3 1.0 4.2 9.0 1.7 1.4 5.2 92.0 0.0 99.3 15.3 0.0 0.7
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy 526 90.3 14.8 0.2 0.2 1.5 9.5 0.0 0.8 5.9 95.8 0.0 92.0 10.3 0.2 2.1
NE 6 7717 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Academy of Scientific Exploration (ASE) 463 79.3 13.6 0.0 0.6 0.9 11.0 0.6 0.4 4.5 94.6 0.0 83.2 14.3 0.2 2.8
NE 6 8843 San Fernando Senior High 2,006 93.2 16.2 0.4 0.3 1.0 13.9 0.4 0.6 5.7 95.7 0.0 94.2 12.3 0.0 1.5
NE 6 8878 Sylmar Charter High 1,777 90.0 16.6 0.2 0.5 1.4 12.0 0.5 1.0 4.2 94.6 0.1 93.0 14.2 0.2 2.7
NE 6 8901 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Technology Preparatory Academy 431 88.9 7.7 0.2 0.0 2.3 18.8 0.5 0.7 10.7 95.8 0.0 91.4 17.2 0.0 1.2
NW 3 8513 Northridge Academy High 1,058 72.8 17.7 0.3 2.6 3.2 6.2 6.5 0.4 1.3 69.3 0.3 75.0 16.4 1.2 16.5
NW 6 8768 James Monroe High 2,230 85.7 12.6 0.1 1.5 2.7 25.5 3.0 1.7 7.8 88.6 0.4 89.8 13.9 0.2 3.2
NW 3 8898 Valley Academy of Arts and Sciences 1,163 67.2 20.5 0.6 3.5 4.2 5.7 7.3 0.6 1.5 58.3 0.4 68.5 19.9 2.0 23.6
NW 6 8363 Francisco Sepulveda Middle 1,442 87.9 18.0 0.3 3.2 3.3 28.2 3.5 0.8 6.9 85.9 0.5 90.6 13.9 0.3 3.0
NE 6 8117 Vista Middle 1,183 92.3 9.0 0.1 1.8 1.5 34.9 2.2 0.6 4.1 92.2 0.6 94.8 16.2 0.1 1.4
NE 6 8321 Pacoima Middle 1,241 86.0 13.2 0.2 0.2 1.5 15.2 0.1 1.0 5.0 95.6 0.1 89.1 12.8 0.2 1.9
NE 6 8080 Richard E. Byrd Middle 1,489 86.2 14.8 0.1 2.2 0.2 16.1 2.5 0.5 1.7 92.1 0.1 89.0 14.0 0.2 2.6
NE 6 8093 Sun Valley High 456 84.6 5.9 0.4 0.7 0.7 30.9 0.0 0.7 2.2 96.1 0.0 87.5 22.8 0.2 2.0
NE 6 8306 Olive Vista Middle 1,082 85.9 13.2 0.0 0.7 0.7 20.1 0.7 0.9 6.0 95.7 0.1 88.7 17.6 0.2 1.8
NE 6 6501 San Fernando Institute of Applied Media 402 91.0 12.9 0.0 0.2 0.5 22.9 0.2 0.5 4.7 97.3 0.0 93.3 20.4 0.2 1.5
NE 6 8358 San Fernando Middle 739 90.1 11.5 0.1 0.4 1.4 28.4 0.4 0.9 3.7 95.3 0.3 92.2 20.4 0.0 2.2
NE 6 8636 John H. Francis Polytechnic 2,806 86.9 16.8 0.1 1.7 1.1 14.0 2.3 0.3 4.1 91.4 0.2 90.4 13.0 0.2 2.9
NW 3 8725 John F. Kennedy High 2,133 79.0 23.3 0.3 2.3 2.8 8.2 3.0 0.5 1.7 81.5 0.2 81.1 16.5 0.5 9.3
NE 6 8228 Charles Maclay Middle 653 89.9 8.3 0.2 0.0 2.6 28.3 0.3 0.9 6.7 95.9 0.0 93.0 15.9 0.0 1.1
NE 6 8396 Sun Valley Magnet 1,488 87.4 11.2 0.1 1.0 1.7 26.1 0.8 0.5 4.0 92.7 0.1 89.2 16.4 0.1 3.3
910
Percentages
American Native Socio-
Black or Students Two or
Loc F/R Indian or English Foster Hawaiian or economically
LD BD School Enrollment GATE Asian African Filipino Homeless Latino with More White
Code Meal Alaska Learner Youth Pacific Disadvant-
American Disabilities Races
Native Islander aged
NE 6 8142 Robert Fulton College Preparatory School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NE 3 8230 James Madison Middle School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NW 4 8406 John A Sutter Middle School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NW 3 8590 Grover Cleveland Charter High 3,198 67.3 34.4 0.3 13.4 4.4 12.6 4.3 0.4 2.2 58.9 0.3 69.4 10.9 1.3 17.1
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE Median 1,173 87.1 13.4 0.2 0.9 1.5 15.7 0.8 0.7 4.4 93.7 0.1 90.1 15.6 0.2 2.4
Los Angeles Unified 633,621 78.8 9.9 0.2 3.7 8.3 24.9 1.9 0.8 2.5 74.0 0.3 80.7 12.0 1.2 10.1
This page displays the number of English learners (ELs) on Census Day, the number of students reclassified since the prior Census Day, and the reclassification rate for each specified
year. The reclassification rate, displayed in percentage, is calculated by dividing the number reclassified by the number of prior year ELs.
a
14-15 14-15 15-16 15-16 16-17 16-17
Loc 13-14 14-15 15-16
LD BD School Reclass Reclass Reclass Reclass Reclass Reclass
Code EL # EL # EL #
# Rate # Rate # Rate
XR 6 8106 North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy 39 1 2.6 63 0 0.0 92 0 0.0
Similar Schools
E 2 8729 Abraham Lincoln Senior High 273 49 17.9 209 27 12.9 154 23 14.9
0 0 7750 Academy of Environmental & Social Policy 49 16 32.7 23 4 17.4 17 3 17.6
XR 2 8823 Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High 59 21 35.6 47 16 34.0 49 4 8.2
XR 2 8626 Alliance Gertz-Ressler Richard Merkin 6-12 Complex 145 18 12.4 139 33 23.7 116 20 17.2
XR 1 8825 Alliance Ouchi-O'Donovan 6-12 Complex 177 27 15.3 173 30 17.3 183 24 13.1
XR 2 8827 Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High 98 15 15.3 85 19 22.4 76 20 26.3
XR 7 8504 Animo Pat Brown 127 21 16.5 100 26 26.0 81 14 17.3
NE 6 8609 Arleta High 245 51 20.8 182 26 14.3 184 32 17.4
XR 5 7733 Aspire Pacific Academy 42 6 14.3 70 10 14.3 69 13 18.8
E 5 8536 Bell Senior High 682 162 23.8 487 74 15.2 417 52 12.5
XR 2 8570 Camino Nuevo Charter High 38 4 10.5 70 23 32.9 72 6 8.3
XR 6 8605 Discovery Charter Preparatory School #2 81 9 11.1 78 10 12.8 58 0 0.0
E 2 8606 Esteban Torres East LA Performing Arts Magnet 90 14 15.6 63 5 7.9 55 4 7.3
C 2 8774 Contreras Learning Center-Los Angeles School of Global Studies 77 14 18.2 83 15 18.1 101 15 14.9
E 5 8882 Maywood Academy High 199 52 26.1 179 20 11.2 212 15 7.1
S 7 8779 Nathaniel Narbonne Senior High 283 31 11.0 231 25 10.8 234 27 11.5
C 2 8206 School for the Visual Arts and Humanities 131 34 26.0 116 12 10.3 121 21 17.4
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy 63 9 14.3 56 17 30.4 49 10 20.4
E 5 8881 South East High 419 93 22.2 398 47 11.8 353 60 17.0
E 5 8871 South Gate Senior High 501 121 24.2 395 63 15.9 413 74 17.9
Similar Schools Median 129 21 17 108 22 16 109 18 16
912
This page displays the number of English learners (ELs) on Census Day, the number of students reclassified since the prior Census Day, and the reclassification rate for each specified
year. The reclassification rate, displayed in percentage, is calculated by dividing the number reclassified by the number of prior year ELs.
a
14-15 14-15 15-16 15-16 16-17 16-17
Loc 13-14 14-15 15-16
LD BD School Reclass Reclass Reclass Reclass Reclass Reclass
Code EL # EL # EL #
# Rate # Rate # Rate
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE
NE 6 7658 Sylmar Biotech Health Academy -- 0 0.0 31 4 12.9 37 6 16.2
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy 63 9 14.3 56 17 30.4 49 10 20.4
NE 6 7717 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Academy of Scientific Exploration (ASE) 84 12 14.3 56 15 26.8 54 14 25.9
NE 6 8843 San Fernando Senior High 430 78 18.1 360 35 9.7 329 60 18.2
NE 6 8878 Sylmar Charter High 341 68 19.9 265 53 20.0 272 61 22.4
NE 6 8901 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Technology Preparatory Academy 102 7 6.9 104 18 17.3 90 6 6.7
NW 3 8513 Northridge Academy High 85 17 20.0 72 24 33.3 54 9 16.7
NW 6 8768 James Monroe High 572 103 18.0 525 80 15.2 508 88 17.3
NW 3 8898 Valley Academy of Arts and Sciences 88 16 18.2 67 15 22.4 69 16 23.2
NW 6 8363 Francisco Sepulveda Middle 433 64 14.8 425 46 10.8 430 80 18.6
NE 6 8117 Vista Middle 424 106 25.0 349 54 15.5 399 98 24.6
NE 6 8321 Pacoima Middle 310 86 27.7 219 36 16.4 235 66 28.1
NE 6 8080 Richard E. Byrd Middle 336 95 28.3 269 32 11.9 285 72 25.3
NE 6 8093 Sun Valley High 189 19 10.1 151 12 7.9 145 12 8.3
NE 6 8306 Olive Vista Middle 241 56 23.2 200 34 17.0 233 42 18.0
NE 6 6501 San Fernando Institute of Applied Media 80 27 33.8 66 2 3.0 85 18 21.2
NE 6 8358 San Fernando Middle 218 53 24.3 166 11 6.6 206 32 15.5
NE 6 8636 John H. Francis Polytechnic 491 108 22.0 439 63 14.4 414 56 13.5
NW 3 8725 John F. Kennedy High 218 42 19.3 179 21 11.7 180 29 16.1
NE 6 8228 Charles Maclay Middle 230 65 28.3 218 26 11.9 227 45 19.8
NE 6 8396 Sun Valley Magnet 302 44 14.6 302 41 13.6 354 58 16.4
NE 6 8142 Robert Fulton College Preparatory School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NE 3 8230 James Madison Middle School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NW 4 8406 John A Sutter Middle School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NW 3 8590 Grover Cleveland Charter High 402 93 23.1 332 49 14.8 360 42 11.7
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE Median 241 55 19.6 209 29 14.6 230 42 18.1
Los Angeles Unified 179,322 29,694 16.6 164,349 19,952 12.1 165,453 27,793 16.8
# OI
# DB
# ED
# MR
# TBI
# AUT
# SLI*
# EMD
# HOH
# OHI*
# SLD*
# DEAF
# %
XR 6 8106 North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy 593 99 16.69 0.89 0.11 9 -- -- -- -- 2 -- 26 -- 61 1 -- --
Similar Schools
E 2 8729 Abraham Lincoln Senior High 1,005 158 15.72 0.68 0.32 24 -- -- 1 -- 3 16 15 4 93 -- 1 1
0 0 7750 Academy of Environmental & Social Policy 216 39 18.06 0.56 0.44 7 -- -- -- -- 1 9 5 -- 17 -- -- --
XR 2 8823 Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High 439 37 8.43 0.92 0.08 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 -- 28 1 -- --
XR 2 8626 Alliance Gertz-Ressler Richard Merkin 6-12 Complex 986 96 9.74 0.86 0.14 10 -- -- -- -- 3 -- 14 -- 65 4 -- --
XR 1 8825 Alliance Ouchi-O'Donovan 6-12 Complex 1,010 81 8.02 0.89 0.11 9 -- -- -- -- -- -- 12 -- 58 2 -- --
XR 2 8827 Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High 620 62 10.00 0.85 0.15 7 -- -- 1 -- -- -- 8 1 44 1 -- --
XR 7 8504 Animo Pat Brown 612 57 9.31 0.84 0.16 6 -- -- 2 -- 1 -- 8 -- 39 1 -- --
NE 6 8609 Arleta High 1,434 186 12.97 0.89 0.11 11 -- -- 6 -- 2 -- 28 2 137 -- -- --
XR 5 7733 Aspire Pacific Academy 441 54 12.24 0.70 0.30 11 -- 1 1 -- 1 1 10 -- 28 -- -- 1
E 5 8536 Bell Senior High 2,953 274 9.28 0.81 0.19 29 -- -- -- -- 5 11 25 5 196 2 -- 1
XR 2 8570 Camino Nuevo Charter High 357 31 8.68 0.90 0.10 2 -- -- 1 -- -- -- 4 -- 23 1 -- --
XR 6 8605 Discovery Charter Preparatory School #2 243 37 15.23 0.86 0.14 4 -- -- -- -- 1 -- 3 -- 28 1 -- --
E 2 8606 Esteban Torres East LA Performing Arts Magnet 424 69 16.27 0.80 0.20 12 -- -- 1 -- 1 -- 7 -- 46 2 -- --
C 2 8774 Contreras Learning Center-Los Angeles School of Global Studies 340 28 8.24 0.89 0.11 1 -- -- 1 -- 1 -- 2 -- 23 -- -- --
E 5 8882 Maywood Academy High 1,354 222 16.40 0.73 0.27 39 -- -- 2 -- -- 13 28 7 133 -- -- --
S 7 8779 Nathaniel Narbonne Senior High 2,367 263 11.11 0.72 0.28 32 -- -- 3 -- 1 18 25 9 162 2 1 10
C 2 8206 School for the Visual Arts and Humanities 452 66 14.60 0.76 0.24 15 -- -- -- -- 1 -- 6 -- 44 -- -- --
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy 526 51 9.70 0.88 0.12 4 -- -- -- -- 2 -- 8 -- 37 -- -- --
E 5 8881 South East High 2,121 228 10.75 0.67 0.33 18 -- -- 3 -- 2 40 16 12 135 2 -- --
E 5 8871 South Gate Senior High 2,832 318 11.23 0.71 0.29 63 -- -- 1 -- 5 16 29 4 197 1 2 --
Similar Schools Median 616 68 10.93 0.83 0.17 11 -- 1 1 -- 1 15 9 5 45 2 1 1
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE
NE 6 7658 Sylmar Biotech Health Academy 288 44 15.28 0.91 0.09 3 -- -- -- -- 1 -- 6 -- 33 1 -- --
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy 526 51 9.70 0.88 0.12 4 -- -- -- -- 2 -- 8 -- 37 -- -- --
NE 6 7717 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Academy of Scientific Exploration (ASE) 463 66 14.25 0.82 0.18 11 -- -- -- -- -- 1 7 -- 44 3 -- --
NE 6 8843 San Fernando Senior High 2,006 246 12.26 0.81 0.19 12 -- -- 4 -- 2 21 27 6 168 5 1 --
NE 6 8878 Sylmar Charter High 1,777 255 14.35 0.82 0.18 9 -- -- 7 -- 1 21 32 8 175 1 1 --
NE 6 8901 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Technology Preparatory Academy 431 72 16.71 0.67 0.33 17 -- -- 2 -- 2 2 9 -- 39 -- -- 1
NW 3 8513 Northridge Academy High 1,058 172 16.26 0.78 0.22 27 -- -- 2 -- 3 1 37 3 98 -- 1 --
NW 6 8768 James Monroe High 2,230 306 13.72 0.82 0.18 23 -- -- 12 -- 3 15 38 1 212 -- -- 2
NW 3 8898 Valley Academy of Arts and Sciences 1,163 232 19.95 0.71 0.29 19 -- -- 3 -- 2 21 45 8 117 2 -- 15
NW 6 8363 Francisco Sepulveda Middle 1,442 198 13.73 0.79 0.21 16 -- -- 1 -- 2 17 28 3 125 4 -- 2
NE 6 8117 Vista Middle 1,183 192 16.23 0.81 0.19 11 -- 2 5 -- 15 1 33 1 123 -- -- 1
NE 6 8321 Pacoima Middle 1,241 158 12.73 0.91 0.09 9 -- -- 6 -- -- -- 19 -- 120 4 -- --
NE 6 8080 Richard E. Byrd Middle 1,489 209 14.04 0.80 0.20 25 -- -- 2 -- 3 -- 23 8 138 6 1 3
NE 6 8093 Sun Valley High 456 107 23.46 0.80 0.20 2 -- -- 2 -- 2 12 7 3 79 -- -- --
NE 6 8306 Olive Vista Middle 1,082 190 17.56 0.73 0.27 36 -- -- -- -- 3 13 23 -- 111 4 -- --
NE 6 6501 San Fernando Institute of Applied Media 402 81 20.15 0.89 0.11 6 -- -- -- -- 1 -- 10 2 56 6 -- --
NE 6 8358 San Fernando Middle 739 153 20.70 0.78 0.22 12 -- -- -- -- 1 17 19 3 99 2 -- --
914
# OI
# DB
# ED
# MR
# TBI
# AUT
# SLI*
# EMD
# HOH
# OHI*
# SLD*
# DEAF
# %
NE 6 8636 John H. Francis Polytechnic 2,806 362 12.90 0.77 0.23 28 -- -- 5 -- 3 35 58 10 218 1 2 2
NW 3 8725 John F. Kennedy High 2,133 351 16.46 0.66 0.34 85 -- -- 5 -- 4 18 53 4 177 3 1 1
NE 6 8228 Charles Maclay Middle 653 104 15.93 0.83 0.17 15 -- -- 1 -- -- 2 12 -- 67 7 -- --
NE 6 8396 Sun Valley Magnet 1,488 243 16.33 0.77 0.23 19 -- -- 3 -- 4 28 26 1 157 4 -- 1
NE 6 8142 Robert Fulton College Preparatory School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NE 3 8230 James Madison Middle School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NW 4 8406 John A Sutter Middle School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NW 3 8590 Grover Cleveland Charter High 3,198 349 10.91 0.82 0.18 42 -- 1 6 -- 1 11 39 1 244 3 -- 1
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE Median 1,173 191.00 15.60 0.81 0 16 -- 2 4 -- 2 15 25 3 119 4 1 2
2016-17 SUBGROUPS
2016-17
AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENTS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITY
Susp. Susp. Susp. # Days Susp. Single Std. # Days Susp. Single Std.
Loc Single Std. # Events # # Events
LD BD School Event Rate Event Rate Event # Enrolled # Events # Days # Enrolled 2016- Event Rate Susp % 2016- Event Rate Susp %
Code Susp. % 2016-17 Enrolled 2016-17
2014-15 2015-16 Rate 17 2016-17 2016-17 17 2016-17 2016-17
XR 6 8106 North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy 7.7% 4.6% 2.0% 2.0% 593 12 39 9 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 114 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
Similar Schools
E 2 8729 Abraham Lincoln Senior High 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1,005 0 0 13 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 158 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
0 0 7750 Academy of Environmental & Social Policy 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 216 3 9 5 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 41 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
XR 2 8823 Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High 0.9% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2% 439 1 2 2 1 2 50.0% 50.0% 37 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
XR 2 8626 Alliance Gertz-Ressler Richard Merkin 6-12 Complex 0.0% 0.6% 0.9% 0.9% 986 9 12 11 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 98 1 1 1.0% 1.0%
XR 1 8825 Alliance Ouchi-O'Donovan 6-12 Complex 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1,010 0 0 64 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 81 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
XR 2 8827 Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High 4.4% 3.1% 3.4% 3.2% 620 21 32 1 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 63 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
XR 7 8504 Animo Pat Brown 2.6% 1.6% 0.7% 0.7% 612 4 6 6 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 58 3 4 5.2% 5.2%
NE 6 8609 Arleta High 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1,434 0 0 12 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 188 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
XR 5 7733 Aspire Pacific Academy 0.2% 0.8% 3.6% 2.0% 441 16 67 3 1 2 33.3% 33.3% 46 5 19 10.9% 8.7%
E 5 8536 Bell Senior High 0.1% 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 2,953 5 25 3 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 275 1 5 0.4% 0.4%
XR 2 8570 Camino Nuevo Charter High 12.0% 4.9% 3.9% 3.4% 357 14 39 1 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 30 2 4 6.7% 3.3%
XR 6 8605 Discovery Charter Preparatory School #2 9.0% 8.1% 1.2% 1.2% 243 3 2 1 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 35 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
E 2 8606 Esteban Torres East LA Performing Arts Magnet 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 424 0 0 15 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 71 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
C 2 8774 Contreras Learning Center-Los Angeles School of Global Studies 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 340 1 1 4 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 30 1 1 3.3% 3.3%
E 5 8882 Maywood Academy High 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 1,354 4 16 1 1 1 100.0% 100.0% 226 3 11 1.3% 1.3%
S 7 8779 Nathaniel Narbonne Senior High 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 2,367 1 2 491 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 276 1 2 0.4% 0.4%
C 2 8206 School for the Visual Arts and Humanities 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 452 0 0 7 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 66 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy 0.0% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% 526 4 16 8 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 54 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
E 5 8881 South East High 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 2,121 2 10 36 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 228 1 5 0.4% 0.4%
E 5 8871 South Gate Senior High 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 2,832 4 16 38 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 323 1 5 0.3% 0.3%
Similar Schools Median 0.2% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 616 3 8 7 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 69 1 1 0.2% 0.2%
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE
NE 6 7658 Sylmar Biotech Health Academy 1.1% 1.2% 1.7% 1.7% 288 5 5 12 1 1 8.3% 8.3% 44 2 2 4.5% 4.5%
NE 6 7716 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy 0.0% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% 526 4 16 8 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 54 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
NE 6 7717 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Academy of Scientific Exploration (ASE) 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 463 2 2 4 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 66 1 1 1.5% 1.5%
NE 6 8843 San Fernando Senior High 3.0% 1.1% 2.3% 2.2% 2,006 47 60 20 1 2 5.0% 5.0% 247 10 14 4.0% 3.6%
NE 6 8878 Sylmar Charter High 0.0% 0.6% 0.2% 0.2% 1,777 4 12 24 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 253 1 2 0.4% 0.4%
NE 6 8901 Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Technology Preparatory Academy 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 431 0 0 10 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 74 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
NW 3 8513 Northridge Academy High 0.0% 0.4% 1.0% 1.0% 1,058 11 23 34 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 173 4 11 2.3% 2.3%
NW 6 8768 James Monroe High 1.3% 1.3% 4.0% 3.0% 2,230 89 173 61 15 27 24.6% 16.4% 310 31 65 10.0% 6.1%
NW 3 8898 Valley Academy of Arts and Sciences 0.4% 0.7% 0.4% 0.4% 1,163 5 7 49 3 3 6.1% 6.1% 231 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
NW 6 8363 Francisco Sepulveda Middle 1.5% 0.9% 3.3% 2.3% 1,442 48 53 48 4 4 8.3% 4.2% 200 12 12 6.0% 5.0%
NE 6 8117 Vista Middle 2.6% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 1,183 1 2 18 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 192 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
NE 6 8321 Pacoima Middle 3.8% 4.1% 1.0% 0.9% 1,241 12 12 18 1 1 5.6% 5.6% 159 3 3 1.9% 1.9%
NE 6 8080 Richard E. Byrd Middle 0.7% 1.2% 0.7% 0.6% 1,489 10 15 3 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 208 7 10 3.4% 2.9%
NE 6 8093 Sun Valley High 0.5% 1.4% 0.7% 0.7% 456 3 9 3 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 104 2 7 1.9% 1.9%
NE 6 8306 Olive Vista Middle 0.4% 0.5% 1.2% 1.2% 1,082 13 17 8 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 190 4 4 2.1% 2.1%
NE 6 6501 San Fernando Institute of Applied Media 0.3% 2.0% 1.0% 1.0% 402 4 5 2 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 82 1 2 1.2% 1.2%
NE 6 8358 San Fernando Middle 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 739 3 15 10 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 151 1 5 0.7% 0.7%
NE 6 8636 John H. Francis Polytechnic 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2,806 1 5 31 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 366 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
NW 3 8725 John F. Kennedy High 0.4% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 2,133 6 14 60 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 352 1 1 0.3% 0.3%
NE 6 8228 Charles Maclay Middle 2.8% 3.4% 2.5% 2.0% 653 16 22 17 1 1 5.9% 5.9% 104 4 8 3.8% 3.8%
918
2016-17 SUBGROUPS
2016-17
AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENTS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITY
Susp. Susp. Susp. # Days Susp. Single Std. # Days Susp. Single Std.
Loc Single Std. # Events # # Events
LD BD School Event Rate Event Rate Event # Enrolled # Events # Days # Enrolled 2016- Event Rate Susp % 2016- Event Rate Susp %
Code Susp. % 2016-17 Enrolled 2016-17
2014-15 2015-16 Rate 17 2016-17 2016-17 17 2016-17 2016-17
NE 6 8396 Sun Valley Magnet 0.6% 2.1% 0.9% 0.7% 1,488 13 27 26 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 244 6 13 2.5% 1.6%
NE 6 8142 Robert Fulton College Preparatory School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NE 3 8230 James Madison Middle School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NW 4 8406 John A Sutter Middle School -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NW 3 8590 Grover Cleveland Charter High 3.0% 1.4% 3.8% 3.3% 3,198 120 158 141 16 16 11.3% 9.9% 347 39 65 11.2% 9.8%
LAUSD Resident Schools from CDE Median 0.5% 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 1,173 6 15 18 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 191 2 4 1.9% 1.8%
Filipino * -- -- 100.0 --
Foster Youth -- -- -- -- --
Homeless -- -- -- -- --
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 13, 2017 the Los Angeles Unified School District (“District”) received a petition
(“Petition”) for the renewal of the North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy
charter for a term of five years. North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy
(“NVMI”) is a 6-12 independent charter school currently serving 610 students in grades 6-12 on
the campus of Sun Valley High School, as a co-location through Proposition 39 currently at 12105
Allegheny Street, Sun Valley, CA 91352, in Board District 6 and Local District Northeast.
Based on a comprehensive review of the renewal petition application and the record of
performance of NVMI, staff has determined that the charter school has not met the requirements
set forth in Education Code sections 47605 and 47607 and therefore recommends denial of the
renewal petition.
The Charter Schools Act of 1992 (“Act”) governs the creation of charter schools in the State of
California. The Act includes Education Code section 47605, subdivision (b), which sets out the
standards and criteria for petition review, and provides that a school district governing board in
considering whether to grant a charter petition “shall grant a charter for the operation of a school
under this part if it is satisfied that granting the charter is consistent with sound educational
practice.”
The Act further provides that renewals and material revisions of charter petitions are governed by
the same standards and criteria set forth in Education Code section 47605 “and shall include but
not be limited to, a reasonably comprehensive description of any new requirement of charter
schools enacted into law after the charter was originally granted or last renewed.” (Ed. Code §
47607, subd. (a)(2).)
According to the California Code of Regulations, title 5, section 11966.4, subdivision (a)(1), a
charter school must also provide documentation with its petition for renewal showing that it has
satisfied at least one of the following academic performance criteria specified in Education Code
section 47607, subdivision (b):
1. Attained its Academic Performance Index (API) growth target in the prior year or in two of
the last three years, or in the aggregate for the prior three years; or
Doc# 571159
1
2. Ranked in deciles 4 to 10, inclusive, on the API in the prior year or in two of the last three
years; or
3. Ranked in deciles 4 to 10, inclusive, on the API for a demographically comparable school in
the prior year or in two of the last three years; or
4. The entity that granted the charter determines that the academic performance of the charter
school is at least equal to the academic performance of the public schools that the charter school
pupils would otherwise have been required to attend, as well as the academic performance of
the schools in the school district in which the charter school is located, taking into account the
composition of the pupil population that is served at the charter school. This determination
shall be based upon all of the following: a) documented and clear and convincing data; b) pupil
achievement data from assessments, including, but not limited to, the Standardized Testing and
Reporting Program established by Article 4 (commencing with Section 60640) for
demographically similar pupil populations in the comparison schools; and c) information
submitted by the charter school; or
5. Qualified for an alternative accountability system pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 52052.
Section 47605(b) states that “[t]he governing board of the school district shall grant a charter for
the operation of a school under this part if it is satisfied that granting the charter is consistent with
sound educational practice. The governing board of the school district shall not deny a petition
for the establishment of a charter school unless it makes written factual findings, specific to the
particular petition, setting forth specific facts to support one or more of the following findings:
1. The charter school presents an unsound educational program for the pupils to be enrolled in
the charter school.
2. The petitioners are demonstrably unlikely to successfully implement the program set forth in
the petition.
3. The petition does not contain the number of signatures required by subdivision [47605] (a).
4. The petition does not contain an affirmation of each of the conditions described in subdivision
(d) [of section 47605].
5. The petition does not contain reasonably comprehensive descriptions of all of the [fifteen
elements set forth in section 47605 (b) (5)].
6. The petition does not contain a declaration of whether or not the charter school shall be deemed
the exclusive public employer of the employees of the charter school for purposes of Chapter
10.7 (commencing with Section 3540) of division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code.”
Doc# 571159
2
State regulations provide:
A petition for renewal submitted pursuant to Education Code section 47607 shall be considered by
the district governing board upon receipt of the petition with all of the requirements set forth in
this subdivision:
1. Documentation that the charter school meets at least one of the criteria specified in Education
Code section 47607(b).
Pursuant to the requirements of SB 1290, the District “shall consider increases in pupil academic
achievement for all groups of pupils served by the charter school as the most important factor in
determining whether to grant a charter renewal.” (Ed. Code § 47607(a)(3)(A).)
In addition, state regulations require the District to “consider the past performance of the school’s
academics, finances, and operation in evaluating the likelihood of future success, along with future
plans for improvement if any.” (5 CCR § 11966.4.)
As discussed above, charter schools that have operated for at least four years must first meet one
of the minimum academic performance criteria listed in Education Code section 47607,
subdivision (b) or Education Code sections 52052(e)(2)(F) and 52052(e)(4)(C) before the renewal
request is analyzed further. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 11966.4; Ed. Code, § 47607, subd. (b).)
(Exhibit B – NVMI Renewal Petition, Element 1).
Based on a comprehensive review of the renewal petition and the school’s record of performance,
District staff has concluded that North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy has
not met the minimum criteria for renewal eligibility and standards and criteria for renewal, in that
the Charter School has not presented clear and convincing evidence of academic performance that
is at least equal to or greater than the academic performance of Resident Schools and District
Similar Schools (Exhibit A1- NVMI Data Set). For two consecutive years (2015-2016 and 2016-
2017), NVMI’s CAASPP (SBAC) results show levels of academic performance that are
significantly below the Resident Schools Median and Similar Schools Median in both English
Language Arts (ELA) and in Math.
Doc# 571159
3
Minimum Renewal Criteria
Yes/No
(School must meet at least one of the following criteria (Ed. Code § 47607(b).)
Has the charter school attained its Academic Performance Index (API) growth target
in the prior year or in two of the last three years, both schoolwide and for all significant N/A
subgroups?
Has the charter school ranked in deciles 4 to 10, inclusive, on the API in the prior year
N/A
or in two of the last three years?
Has the charter school ranked in deciles 4 to 10, inclusive, on the API for a
N/A
demographically comparable school in the prior year or in two of the last three years?
Has the charter school presented clear and convincing evidence of academic
performance that is at least equal to or greater than the academic performance of No
Resident Schools and District Similar Schools*?
*“Resident Schools” = Public schools that the charter school students would have otherwise attended based on their
addresses. “District Similar Schools” are LAUSD schools on the CDE’s Similar Schools list for this charter school.
(Exhibit A1- NVMI Data Set.)
On the 2016-2017 CAASPP (SBAC) assessment in English Language Arts, 21.16% of NVMI’s
students Met or Exceeded the performance standards, which is lower than the Resident Schools
Median of 35.56% and the Similar Schools Median of 56.38%. In Math, 6.07% of NVMI’s
students Met or Exceeded the performance standards, which is lower than the Resident Schools
Median of 18.55% and the Similar Schools Median of 20.49%. On the 2015-2016 CAASPP
(SBAC) assessment, the same pattern emerged. In English Language Arts, 11.00% of NVMI’s
students Met or Exceeded the performance standards, which was lower than the Resident Schools
Median of 44.50% and the Similar Schools Median of 55.00%. In Math, 8.00% of NVMI’s
students Met or Exceeded the performance standards, which was lower than the Resident Schools
Median of 18.00% and the Similar Schools Median of 22.50% (Exhibit A1- NVMI Data Set).
Pursuant to the requirements of SB 1290, the District “shall consider increases in pupil academic
achievement for all groups of pupils served by the charter school as the most important factor in
determining whether to grant a charter renewal.” (Ed. Code § 47607(a) (3) (A).) The Charter
School’s record of academic performance indicates that NVMI’s numerically significant
subgroups (English Learners, Students with Disabilities, Latino and Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged) have achieved some growth in academic performance, but the results reveal single
digit proficiency levels for half of the charter school’s subgroups in ELA, and for all of the charter
school’s subgroups in Math.
Based on the past two years of CAASPP (SBAC) data, comparison of the percentages of students
that Met or Exceeded the performance standards reveals that NVMI’s English Learners increased
by 0.30 percentage points in ELA, as a result 1.30% of students scored at Met or Exceeded
categories. In Math, the English Learner subgroup exhibited no growth and remained the same at
0 percent proficient. For the Students with Disabilities subgroup, there was an increase of 6.21
percentage points in ELA, (resulting in 9.21% who Met or Exceeded standards) and in Math,
Doc# 571159
4
increased to 1.32% from the previous year’s performance level of 0 percent proficient. For the
Latino subgroup, students increased by 8.88 percentage points in ELA, (resulting in 19.88% who
scored at Met or Exceeded categories) but decreased by 2.12 percentage points in Math, as a result
4.88% of students scored at Met or Exceeded categories. Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
students increased by 9.50 percentage points in ELA, as a result 19.50% of students scored at Met
or Exceeded categories, and decreased by 2.3 percentage points in Math, as a result 4.70% of
students scored at Met or Exceeded categories. (Exhibit A1- NVMI Data Set).
Furthermore, when comparing the percentage of students who Met or Exceeded the performance
standards in ELA, NVMI was lower than 20 out of 22 Resident Schools; in Math, NVMI was
lower than 19 out of 22 Resident Schools. (Exhibit A1- NVMI Data Set).
Moreover, NVMI’s record reveals persistently low English Learner reclassification rates. For the
past two years, NVMI’s reclassification rate was 0%, and in 2014-2015, was 2.6%. Conversely,
the rate of reclassification over the past three years for Similar Schools was at least 16%, and for
Resident Schools at least 14%. It is noteworthy that the number of English Learners at NVMI has
increased during the same timeframe when its reclassification rate decreased. The charter school
went from having one (1) English Learner (EL) student in 2014-2015, to 63 EL students in 2015-
2016, and 92 EL students in 2016-2017 (Exhibit A1- NVMI Data Set).
While the school’s four-year cohort graduation rate for the 2015-2016 school year is 95%, higher
than the Resident Schools Median of 86.7% and Similar Schools Median of 91.2%, staff is
concerned with the low levels of proficiency noted above in the CAASPP (SBAC) data, including
in comparison with Resident and Similar Schools. (Exhibit A1- NVMI Data Set).
After a careful and thorough review of the Petition, the school’s record of performance, and all
documentation submitted by North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy,
District staff recommends that the Board of Education adopt these Findings of Fact for the Denial
Doc# 571159
5
of the North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy Charter Renewal and deny
the renewal petition based on the following grounds:
(A) Petitioner is demonstrably unlikely to successfully implement the program set forth in the
petition; (Ed. Code § 47605(b)(2).)
(B) The charter school presents an unsound educational program for the pupils to be enrolled in
the charter school; (Ed. Code § 47605(b)(1).)and
(C) The petition does not contain reasonably comprehensive descriptions of all required
elements. (Ed. Code § 47605(b)(5).)
The renewal petition contained inaccurate data to support its presentation of student
achievement. Petitioners included a table with reclassification rates that do not match
the rates reported by the California Department of Education (CDE). In addition, the
table entitled “CDE School Dashboard with 2017 DF3 Projections” was provided as
evidence of academic success, that was contradicted by official (CDE) data (Exhibit
A2 ELA and Math Assessment Report, CA School Dashboard, Spring 2017 and
Exhibit B – NVMI Renewal Petition, p. 17). The CDE Dashboard reveals that the
schoolwide and subgroup student performance levels in English Language Arts and
Math are at the “Lowest” performance levels as denoted by the color “Red.” The
Status is “Very Low” in both ELA and Math for schoolwide and for all numerically
significant subgroups. Finally, the “Change” column for schoolwide indicates
“Declined Significantly” in ELA and “Maintained” in Math. (Exhibit A2- ELA and
Math Assessment Report, CA School Dashboard, Spring 2017.)
On February 28, 2017, the Charter Schools Division (CSD) issued a letter to NVMI
expressing concerns about the academic progress of their students. The CSD
requested a detailed description of how the school intended to improve student
performance in both ELA and Math as measured by the CAASPP (SBAC)
assessments schoolwide and for all subgroups (Exhibit C1- Student Achievement and
Educational Performance Notice). On May 6, 2017, over two months after the initial
correspondence, NVMI responded with their plan. A review of NVMI’s response
revealed insufficient detail that raised concerns about the school’s capacity for
effectuating change and accomplishing academic improvements. (Exhibit C2- NVMI
Response to Student Achievement and Educational Performance Notice).
On September 20, 2017, after receiving NVMI’s renewal application, the CSD gave
NVMI an additional opportunity to share, in detail, their plans for student academic
growth. The petitioners’ responses either lack specific operational, organizational and
educational plans, or lack alignment with the renewal charter petition, further
Doc# 571159
6
indicating that the petitioner is demonstrably unlikely to successfully implement the
program. Moreover, as noted further below, the school’s precarious fiscal position
limits its ability to infuse additional resources to make improvements.
Petitioners have presented an unsound financial plan for the proposed charter school:
o The petition does not provide an adequate plan describing how the school intends
to meet its enrollment projection for grades 4 and 5. The Charter School’s five-
year cash flow budget projections, submitted with the petition, include the
elementary grades that the Charter School is proposing to add, namely, grades 4
and 5, beginning with the 2018-2019 fiscal year. Student enrollment is projected
at 725, 805, 905 and 915 for the four years beginning with Fiscal Year 2018-2019,
compared to the current enrollment of 610 in 2017-2018, as indicated in the
Charter School’s budget. When grades 4 and 5 are removed from the Charter
School’s assumptions, student enrollment projections would be lowered to 655,
665, 695, and 705 for the four years starting 2018-2019. As described above, the
Petitioners have not operated an elementary school before, and the Petition fails to
describe the instructional program specifically geared for the elementary grades it
is proposing to add.
o The Charter School uses an Average Daily Attendance (ADA) of 97% across the
five years in its budget, which is higher than the historical trend of 93%, 97% and
94% in 2016-2017, 2015-2016, and 2014-2015, respectively, based on the data
reflected on the California Department of Education’s website. This is significant
because the assumption of 97% ADA creates an inaccurate projection as explained
below:
Doc# 571159
7
o The Charter School’s five-year cash flow budget projections, submitted with the
petition, project the receipt of $2,375,000 in fundraising revenues and donations
over the next five years. Even with the anticipated and scheduled fundraising
events for 2017-2018 per the Petitioners, which include a $118,000 donation
received to date from a single donor, the Charter School did not provide
documentation or evidence to fully support the likelihood that the Charter School
will actually be able to obtain such anticipated funds in its budget. The Charter
School’s basis for the fundraising revenues and donations in its budget is built on
the assumption that it will be able to achieve at least the same level of fundraising
and donations it did in 2016-2017 (approximately $320,000), including the
assumption of a fundraising target at $550/ADA each year going forward
(compared to $212/ADA or $73,000 in 2014-2015, $231/ADA or $112,000 in
2015-2016, and $400/ADA or $221,000 in 2016-2017). The Charter School does
not have a history supporting the significant increase per ADA going forward in
school-site fundraising or consistent major contributors in the past years.
Fundraising revenues or donations should be considered supplemental revenue
sources for the school, and without written agreements or firm commitments, may
vary from year to year. These revenue amounts (totaling $475,000 for each of the
five years, as presented in its budget), represent a significant portion of the Charter
School’s budgeted revenue, and the Charter School relies on these non-guaranteed
sources for a significant portion of its operational budget. Should the Charter
School not receive the amount of funds it assumes, it is unlikely that the Charter
School will be able to meet its financial obligations, which would significantly
impact its ability to successfully operate its educational program.
Petitioners have not presented clear and thorough fiscal policies. During the 2016-
2017 annual performance-based oversight visit, the CSD noted that the Charter School
had been continuously cited for not having robust fiscal policies with clearly written
guidelines in some fiscal areas. The Charter School’s recently revised, governing
board-approved fiscal policies still have not addressed all the areas identified in the
2016-2017 Annual Performance-Based Oversight Visit Report.
B. The charter school presents an unsound educational program for the pupils to be
enrolled in the charter school.
NVMI’s petition did not contain essential descriptions to demonstrate its sound
educational program for English Learners. The renewal petition does not include a
description of designated English Language Development (ELD), nor is it found in
any proposed class schedule. (Exhibit B- NVMI Renewal Petition p. 29). The petition
does not include detailed reclassification criteria nor does it address the process for
monitoring RFEPs, LTELs, and those “At-Risk” of becoming LTEL students. (Exhibit
G1- 2016-2017 “At-Risk” and Long-Term English Learners (LTEL) by Grade Report
and Exhibit A1- NVMI Data Set).
NVMI’s student discipline policy contradicts the School Discipline Policy and School
Climate Bill of Rights passed by the LAUSD Board of Education. The NVMI
Cadet/Parent Handbook, and renewal petition Element 10, states, “the successful
Doc# 571159
8
operation of any military organization, a cadet’s refusal to comply with established
grooming and uniform regulations is regarded as an act of defiance. Therefore, all
such acts of non-compliance are grounds for suspension and/or expulsion.” (Exhibit
D1-2016-2017 NVMI Cadet/Parent Handbook, p. 145). In addition, NVMI states,
“Cadets who do not meet our expectations for conduct, integrity, and/or who do not
fulfill their duties are given extensive supports and multiple opportunities to modify
behaviors and attitudes, but may forfeit their opportunity to attend NVMI if they do
not take advantage of those opportunities and supports” (Exhibit B- NVMI Renewal
Petition, p. 6).
The charter school’s admissions procedures include requirements which are contrary
to statute that requires charter schools to enroll all student who wish to attend.
NVMI’s renewal petition states, “[a]ll students enrolling in NVMI must successfully
complete an Entrance Camp….”
C. The Petition does not contain reasonably comprehensive descriptions of all of the
[fifteen elements set forth in section 47605, subdivision (b)(5)]:
The Petition fails to describe the instructional program specifically geared for the
elementary grades that school is proposing to add, namely grades 4 and 5. The petition
states, “The demanding academic program includes language arts, math, science and
history, as well as world languages, leadership, and physical fitness training.” (Exhibit
B- NVMI Renewal Petition, pp. 6, 70, and 81). However, petitioners do not describe
the elementary school program nor do they address or identify textbooks related to the
elementary school grades. The current petition only describes “textbooks currently in
use as of August 2017” (Exhibit B- NVMI Renewal Petition, p. 110-111) which are
those currently utilized in grades 6-12. The petition states that “textbooks for grades
4-5 are currently under consideration by the NVMI Curriculum Committee using the
regular textbook adoption process…” (Exhibit B- NVMI Renewal Petition, p 111).
The Petition does not include details about how charter school will support Foster
Youth. For example, the petition acknowledges that, “Almost every enrolled [student]
has experienced one…of the following characteristics:…English Learners…Foster
Youth…” (Exhibit B- Renewal NVMI Petition, p. 14 and 73). However, a detailed
explanation about how Foster Youth will be identified, how their needs will be met,
what supports will be provided and how and by whom progress will be monitored are
missing from the submitted petition.
The Petition fails to identify how and by whom school will monitor the progress of
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged/Low Income Students (Exhibit B- NVMI Renewal
Petition, p. 122).
Doc# 571159
9
The Petition fails to identify how and by whom school will monitor the progress of
Students Achieving Above Grade Level (Exhibit B- NVMI Renewal Petition, pp. 123-
124).
The Petition does not identify the specific criteria for passing “A-G” courses. Instead,
the Petition states in general terms, “Students must pass all required courses taken
while in attendance at the school and have a minimum of 260 credits.” (Exhibit B-
Renewal NVMI Petition, p. 84).
The Petition does not ensure that the school is committed to remain Western
Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC) accredited, which raises concerns for
the future graduates of NVMI.
NVMI’s renewal petition does not include required language for Special Education
and the Modified Consent Decree (MCD). The Petition does not contain an affirmation
that the school is required to utilize MiSiS directly or interface with MiSiS via a web
based Application Programming Interface (API) in compliance with the requirements
of the MCD and applicable timelines.
The petition does not include a description of the major roles and responsibilities, within
the governance structure, of any executive-level employees (e.g., the Superintendent
who is “also known as Executive Director” per Bylaws Article V, section 7(a);
Commandant, etc.).
The petition fails to provide a sufficient description of how the Charter School will
comply with the Brown Act. While the petition specifies that the Charter School will
comply with the Brown Act, neither the petition nor NVMI corporate Bylaws (which
are not signed/adopted and were inserted as text in the petition), specify locations for
posting regular or teleconference meeting agendas to ensure adequate notice and
participation of the public. Further, the Bylaws, and petition, fail to describe other
requirements for conducting a meeting by teleconference including accessibility of the
location(s) to interested stakeholders. Also, Article V, section 15 of Bylaws allows
Trustees to continue to transact business in the absence of a quorum at a “meeting at
which a quorum is initially present notwithstanding the withdrawal of Trustees, if any
action taken is approved by at least a majority of the required quorum for that meeting”
instead of meeting as a committee or adjourning per the California Attorney General
(Brown Act publication 2003), thereby violating the open meeting laws of the Brown
Act.
The Charter School’s corporate Board Bylaws, inserted within the petition, allow for
practices that may run contrary to conflict of interest laws including Government Code
section 1090 et seq. and District policies applicable to the Charter School. For instance,
Doc# 571159
10
the Bylaws in Article V, section 4 provides for officers of the corporation to designate
a new board of Trustees in the absence of any remaining Board members to elect new
members while Article VI, section 3(a) describe the composition of an Executive
Committee to include “all of the officers of the Corporation who are also Trustees….”
Both provisions indicate that officers, who are paid employees are allowed to designate
and could also be members of the Board of Trustees. While Article V, section 17
provides that Trustees may not receive compensation, there is clearly an overlap in
powers and roles of officers and Trustees which could present violation in conflict of
interest laws including Government Code section 1090.
The Petition inadequately addresses the Governing Board’s responsibility for public
accountability and transparency.
o Charter School shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and
regulations, and District policy as it relates to charter schools, as they may be
amended from time to time.
o Charter School shall comply with all applicable federal and state reporting
requirements, including but not limited to the requirements of CBEDS, CALPADS,
the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999, and Education Code section
47604.33.
o Charter School shall comply with the Brown Act and the Public Records Act.
o Charter School and all employees and representatives of Charter School, including
members of Charter School’s governing board, members of Charter School or
governing board committees and councils, Charter School administrators, and
managers, shall comply with federal and state laws, nonprofit integrity standards,
and LAUSD charter school policy, regarding ethics and conflicts of interest. Charter
School shall enter into all transactions and conduct business with all persons and
entities at arm’s length or, in the case of otherwise permissible related party
transactions, in a manner equivalent to arm’s length.
o Charter School shall notify parents, guardians, and teachers in writing within 72
hours of the issuance of a Notice of Violation, Notice of Intent to Revoke, Final
Decision to Revoke, Notice of Non-Renewal, or equivalent notice, by the LAUSD
Board of Education.
The Petition does not include provisions for compliance with Title IX, Section 504 and
Uniform Complaint Procedures which is required to inform its stakeholders, including
students and parents, of their rights pursuant to those laws.
Doc# 571159
11
The Petition does not include an assurance that the Charter School and its nonprofit
corporation shall promptly respond to all reasonable inquiries, including but not limited
to inquiries regarding financial records from the District, and shall cooperate with the
District regarding any inquiries. The petitioner does not acknowledge that the Charter
School, including but not limited to its nonprofit corporation, is subject to audit by
LAUSD, including, without limitation, audit and investigation by the District Office of
the Inspector General if an allegation or other evidence of waste, fraud, abuse, or other
material violation of law related to Charter School’s operations, or breach of the Charter,
is received or discovered by the District, Charter School, including but not limited to its
nonprofit corporation, employees, and representatives.
Charter School does not acknowledge that persons and entities that directly exercise
control over the expenditure of Charter School’s public funds shall be subject to all
necessary and appropriate District charter school oversight for accountability and
protection of public funds.
Petition does not contain a provision that the Charter School shall not require a parent
or legal guardian of a prospective or enrolled student to perform volunteer service hours,
or make payment of fees or other monies, goods, or services in lieu of performing
volunteer service, as a condition of his/her child’s admission, continued enrollment,
attendance, or participation in the school’s educational activities, or otherwise
discriminate against a student in any manner because his/her parent cannot, has not, or
will not provide volunteer service to Charter School.
Petition does not fully contain the following provisions to ensure the health and safety of pupils
and staff, including the following:
o Charter School shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements related
to school and student health, safety, and emergency preparedness.
o If Charter School occupies and/or operates on a District facility, Charter School shall
comply with all District health, safety, and emergency procedures and requirements
applicable to District facilities and related operations, and shall be subject to inspection by
the District’s Facilities Services Division, Office of Environmental Health and Safety, and
other District offices in the same manner as other LAUSD campuses.
o Charter School shall stock and maintain the required number and type of emergency
epinephrine auto-injectors onsite and provide training to employee volunteers in the storage
and use of the epinephrine auto-injector as required by Education Code section 49414 and
section 4119.2 of the Business and Professions Code, as they may be amended from time to
time.
Doc# 571159
12
o Charter School shall comply with the requirements of Education Code section 49475, with
respect to any athletic program (as defined in Education Code § 49475) offered by or on
behalf of Charter School.
o Charter School shall provide all employees, and other persons working on behalf of Charter
School who are mandated reporters, with annual training on child abuse detection and
reporting, which shall occur within the first six weeks of each school year, or within the first
six weeks of a person’s employment if employed after the beginning of the school year, in
accordance with the requirements of AB 1432 (2014).
o Charter School shall periodically review, and update and/or modify as necessary, its Health,
Safety, and Emergency Preparedness Plan, and keep it readily available for on-site use.
Charter School shall provide a copy of the Health, Safety, and Emergency Preparedness
Plan for review upon CSD request.
The Petition does not contain a provision that it shall comply with all requirements of the
Crawford v. Board of Education, City of Los Angeles court order and the LAUSD Integration
Policy adopted and maintained pursuant to the Crawford court order by the District’s Student
Integration Services (collectively the “Court-ordered Integration Program”). The Court-
ordered Integration Program applies to all schools within or chartered through LAUSD.
Element 8 failed to describe the timelines and procedures related to admission and lottery
requirements, including:
Doc# 571159
13
the procedures and timelines under which parents/guardians must respond in order to
secure admission
Method for documenting the fair execution of lottery and waitlist procedures
Element 8 provides that “[a]ll students enrolling in NVMI must successfully complete
an Entrance Camp….” This is a conditional admission practice contrary to the law
requiring charter schools to admit all who wish to attend.
Further, Element 8 includes a requirement that “each admitted student is required to
participate in an interview with a member of the NVMI Admissions Staff.” This is a
concern in that an interview is mostly understood to be an evaluation process and may
be used to weed out students who do not meet expectations of the highly regimented
military structure of the Charter School.
The Petition does not contain a provision acknowledging requirements under applicable
federal and state laws regarding homeless and foster youth, including but not limited to the
provisions of AB 379 (2015) and Chapter 5.5 (commencing with Section 48850) of Part
27 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education Code. The Petition also does not contain a
provision that Charter School shall extend its uniform complaint procedure to complaints
filed pursuant to the applicable provisions of AB 379.
o The Petition does not contain the following provisions to ensure nondiscriminatory
admissions processes:
Charter School shall not request or require submission of a student’s IEP, Section
504 Plan, or any other record or related information prior to admission,
participation in any admissions or attendance lottery, or pre-enrollment event or
process, or as a condition of admission or enrollment.
14
o Statistical Report – monthly according to Charter School’s Calendar of Reports
In addition:
P1, first week of January
P2, first week of April
o Instructional Calendar – annually five weeks prior to first day of instruction
o Other reports as requested by the District
The petition’s description of the Charter School’s procedures for the discipline of students
seems to conflict with the District’s 2013 School Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of
Rights (applicable to LAUSD-authorized charter schools through Board’s adoption of this
Resolution) prohibiting student suspension and expulsion for “willful defiance.” Specifically,
the petition states that a Charter School student may be suspended or expelled for offences
which include the following:
o Failure to show military courtesy
o Willful disobedience or defiance (including serious misconduct of an unsafe nature in a
school science laboratory)
o Extreme disruption or defiance (includes recording of inappropriate campus activities for
the purpose posting to the internet)
Violation of the above offences are tantamount to discipline on the grounds of “willful defiance”
which is contrary to the District’s 2013 School Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of
Rights. Moreover, the petition is inconsistent with Education Code section 48900(k)(1) which
states that except as provided in Section 48910, a pupil enrolled in kindergarten or any of grades
1 to 3, inclusive, shall not be suspended for disruption of school activities or willful defiance
and that pupil enrolled in kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive, shall not be grounds
for expulsion.
The Petition fails to describe how and where the Charter School will provide students with
meaningful access to education during the term of the suspension by failing to include the
protocol regarding the provision of instruction and materials for suspended students (e.g.,
homework, missed tests).
The Petition does not contain the following provisions which would ensure due process for
students facing suspension or discipline:
o Charter School shall provide due process for all students, including adequate and timely
notice to parents/guardians and students of the grounds for all suspension and expulsion
recommendations and decisions and their due process rights regarding suspension and
expulsion, including rights of appeal.
Doc# 571159
15
o Charter School shall ensure that its policies and procedures regarding suspension and
expulsion will be periodically reviewed, and modified as necessary, in order to conform to
changes in state law.
o Charter School shall be responsible for the appropriate interim placement of students during
and pending the completion of Charter School’s student expulsion process and shall
facilitate the post-expulsion placement of expelled students.
o Charter School shall document and implement the alternatives to suspension and expulsion
that Charter School utilizes in response to attendance-related concerns, e.g. truancy or
excessive tardiness.
o Charter School’s governing board shall adopt rules establishing a procedure for processing
reinstatements, including the review of documents regarding the rehabilitation plan. Charter
School is responsible for reinstating the student upon the conclusion of the expulsion period
in a timely manner.
The Petition does not include the following language that would ensure adherence to the Chanda
Smith Modified Consent Decree pertaining to the discipline of students with disabilities:
o Charter School shall ensure that its staff is knowledgeable about and complies with the
District’s Discipline Foundation Policy and/or current equivalent policy, as required by the
Modified Consent Decree. Charter School shall comply with the terms of the School
Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights resolution adopted by the LAUSD
Board of Education on May 6, 2013.
V. RECOMMENDATION
Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends that the Petition be denied for the following reasons:
(1) The charter school presents an unsound educational program for the pupils to be enrolled in
the charter school; (2) it is demonstrably unlikely that the Petitioners will successfully implement
the program set forth in the Petition; and, (3) the Petition does not contain reasonably
comprehensive descriptions of certain required elements set forth in Education Code section
47605, subdivision (b)(5)(A-O).
As stated in the comments to SB 1290, “This bill specifies that a charter authorizer must consider
increases in pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils served by the school, as measured
by the [Academic Performance Index (API)], ‘as the most important factor’ for renewal and
revocation. This does not mean the charter school is automatically not renewed or revoked, but it
does mean that the charter authority must consider this information as the most important factor in
making its decision. In other words, the charter authority must give extra weight to this factor
when it considers all the factors for renewal or revocation.”
In review of the Charter School’s Petition, the District has considered increases in pupil academic
achievement for all groups of pupils served by the charter school as the most important factor in
determining whether to grant the charter renewal.
Doc# 571159
16
VI. CONCLUSION
In order to deny the Petition on the grounds set forth above, Education Code section 47605,
subdivision (b), requires the Board to make “written factual findings, specific to the particular
petition, setting forth specific facts to support one or more” grounds for denying the Petition.
Should the Board decide to deny the Petition, District Staff recommends that the Board adopt these
Findings of Fact as its own.
Doc# 571159
17
EXHIBIT D1