Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structural Analysis of Steel Structures Under Fire Loading: Acta Polytechnica Hungarica January 2009
Structural Analysis of Steel Structures Under Fire Loading: Acta Polytechnica Hungarica January 2009
net/publication/236016000
CITATIONS READS
9 386
1 author:
Chiara Crosti
Sapienza University of Rome
40 PUBLICATIONS 92 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Chiara Crosti on 21 May 2014.
Keywords: Thermo-plastic material, non-linear analysis, steel structure, thermal buckling, bowing effect, structural collapse.
F Y
6
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 X
Elem.1 Elem.2 Elem.3 Elem.4 Elem.5 Elem.6 Elem.7 Elem.8 Elem.9 Elem.10
A thermo-plastic material requires the use of Finite Ele- the chosen model to be validated, evaluating how two dif-
ment Code (FEC), which enables the correct implementation ferent finite element codes, see Adina [2] and Strand [3],
of these well-known evolutive parameters. Not all FECs allow approach the fire resistance of steel structures.
the evaluation of thermo-plastic material behavior. These cases also enable us to deal with some typical be-
The calculation method finds numerical results by means havior of a simple structure in which the collapse is due to loss
of an iterative procedure: i.e., a procedure that predicts of resistance and stiffness [4].
the updating of parameters with temperature increase. For
solving the problem, it is therefore necessary to develop a 3.1 Structural elements with unconstrained
nonlinear analysis, which is the only way to obtain a realistic lateral expansion
representation of the problem.
A three-meter-long simply supported beam has been con-
In particular, geometric effects are very important for the sidered, with a rectangular section of 0.3×0.3 meters. This
study of structures under fire action. In fact, where these ef- beam is subjected to a constant vertical force (F) at the mid-
fects are not taken into consideration, buckling phenomena span of 1410 kN (Fig. 1).
are not included in the analysis. This can be an important
By means of analyses accounting for the material and geo-
error, especially in the case of redundant structures. This
metric nonlinearity, it is possible for example to evaluate how
aspect will be highlighted in the course of the paper.
two finite element codes, see Adina [2] and Strand [3], man-
In this paper, the fire action is applied to the element as a age to gather some of the phenomena that frequently emerge
temperature curve, and the curve assigned is the parametric in steel elements subject to fire action.
curve called ISO834 [1], which has a zero thermal gradient in
One important consideration is the trend of the displace-
the single finite element. This particular curve is used for
ments in time, i.e., during the temperature increase. As an
identifying the class of fire resistance for a general structure as
example, the trend of the vertical displacement of the node at
well as the evaluation of a general conventional assessment of
the midspan of the beam is shown in Fig. 2.
fire resistance.
Fig. 2 shows that after 400 sec, there are noteworthy dis-
placements, due to the fact that that this time limit represents
3 Numerical analysis on isolated a critical time of fire resistance for the considered element. A
similar consideration can be made observing the trend of the
elements simple support horizontal displacement (Fig. 3), in which
This section shows two basic examples related to steel nevertheless it is possible to point out a phenomenon very fre-
elements subjected to fire action. These two examples enable quent in structures subjected to fire.
t (sec)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
0
-0.2
-0.4
ADINA
Dy (m)
-0.6 STRAUS
-0.8
-1
-1.2
t (sec)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
0.2
0.0
ADINA
-0.2
Dx (m)
STRAUS
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
In fact, after an initial progressive lateral expansion, due (ISO834) [1] and to a lateral force F = 14 kN at mid-length to
to the initial temperature rise that generates positive dis- simulate initial member imperfections. In this case, the beam
placements, the trend of the displacement is inverted. This is assumed to be restrained against lateral torsional buckling
inversion is because, after a certain time and due to the tem- and so only in-plan overall buckling checks need to be made,
perature rise, the beam is no longer able to support the this being the most critical case. The beam is of hypothetical
applied load. This is due to the progressive temperature rise square section in order to simplify the analysis. The restrained
that leads to a noteworthy reduction in the load-bearing thermal expansion produces an indirect axial force that must
capacity of the structural element, thus leading to the pro- be taken into account for a correct assessment of fire resis-
gressive approaching of the external nodes, a phenomenon tance, as shown in Fig. 4.
known in the literature as the bowing effect [5]. A square section of 0.1×0.1 meters has been considered.
Therefore, referring to the horizontal node displacement For this section, the analysis provides a solution only when the
of node no. 11 of the beam, it is simple to see how the cou- axial reaction produced by the thermal expansion is below the
pling between material and geometric nonlinearity enables critical buckling load value, as shown in Fig. 4.
us to pick the progressive approaching of extreme nodes of With an increase in element section, for example from
the beam, when the temperature increases and the resistance 0.1×0.1 to 0.2×0.2 meters, the solution is stopped when the
and the stiffness decrease. This factor is perfectly pointed out axial reaction curve crosses the yield development curve, as
in both codes used here. shown in Fig. 5. Above this yield load, there is an important
fall in the critical buckling load, which becomes smaller than
3.2 Structural element with constrained lateral the yield load in such a way that the axial reaction cannot in-
crease. In fact, with entrance into the plastic domain, Euler’s
expansion equation, used to determine the critical buckling load in
This paragraph analyzes the thermal buckling of an axi- the elastic domain, can still be used as long as the Young’s
ally loaded beam, with both ends fixed against rotation. The modulus is replaced by the Tangent Modulus value. This for-
beam considered here is 3 meters long, subjected to fire mula is known as Shanley’s equation [6].
2.50E+06
Pcr Elastic
2.00E+06 Rx STRAUS
Pcr Yield
Pcr, Rx (N)
1.50E+06 Rx ADINA
1.00E+06
5.00E+05
0.00E+00
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
T (°C)
3.5E+07
1.0E+07
5.0E+06
0.0E+00
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
T (°C)
Fig. 5: Collapse for thermal buckling of an element with section 0.2×0.2 meters
2.5E+08
Pcr Elastic
2.0E+08 Rx STRAUS
Pcr Yield
Pcr Elastic-Plastic
Pcr, Rx (N)
1.5E+08 Rx ADINA
1.0E+08
5.0E+07
0.0E+00
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
T (°C)
Fig. 6: Collapse for thermal buckling of an element with section 0.6×0.6 meters
By increasing the cross section from 0.1×0.1 to 0.2×0.2 decrease in stiffness, denoted by the trend of the curves of the
meters, it can be observed that the solution is blocked in cor- axial reaction (Fig. 6).
respondence to the attainment of the yield strength (Fig. 5). The results are synthesized in Table 2, where the critical
When this is exceeded, a noteworthy decrease in the critical temperature is also determined. For further considerations,
buckling strength is observed, which reaches a value lower the reader is referred to [4].
than the yield strength. As a matter of fact, in the plastic field,
the Euler formula, used for calculating the critical load in a
linear elastic field, is still valid if the value of the elastic 4 Structural analysis of steel
modulus (E) is substituted by the tangent modulus (Shanley
theory [6]). By increasing the cross section dimensions even
structures under fire
more (up to 0.6×0.6 and 0.8×0.8 meters) it is possible to This section investigates the structural behavior of a real
gather the post-yield strength, characterized by a noteworthy steel structure. The objective of the analyses is, firstly, to high-
Table 2: Comparative results
light some of the peculiar effects arising from the fire loading, As stated above, the fire action is modeled by means of the
and, secondly, to evaluate how changing the scenarios of the ISO834 parametric curve applied directly to the elements
fire also changes the collapse of the structure. The analyses involved in the fire.
(implemented in commercial FEC Strand) account for the Therefore, for example, in Scenario 1, this curve is ap-
material and geometry nonlinearities, and are thus able to de- plied to some secondary and principal beams and to the two
scribe accurately the actual behavior of the structure. To carry columns of the central frame.
out the fire resistance analyses, only vertical loads are applied By means of non linear analyses, it was possible to include
to the structure, in accordance with the Italian Code [7] for considerations of structural fire resistance, and also to figure
structures subjected to fire action. out how some elements, such as the columns, are fundamen-
tal for the stability of the whole structure.
Scenario n°
n°1 Scenario n°
n°2
Scenario n°
n°3 Scenario n°
n°4
formed shape for the first scenario, where the columns are ture is more important than a study of the individual elements
involved in the fire. composing the structure. This leads to some considerations
From the figure, we can evaluate how the application of regarding the structural dependability of the facility [8], in
fire to the columns leads to a critical state for the structure, terms of collapse resistance [9]. In fact, when a structure is re-
due to the appearance of buckling phenomena. In fact, from dundant, there are many alternative load paths, large defor-
the moment it loses its load bearing capacity, the column is no mations can develop without a loss of its load bearing capac-
longer able to withstand the applied load and it sags towards ity, and structural failure must be accounted for in a different
its weak direction. way. This phenomenon creates a sufficient reserve capacity to
The situation in Scenario 4 is different. Here, the fire is allow most of such structures to survive fires with reasonable
applied only to some secondary beams and does not involve structural damage.
any columns; in Fig. 10, the zone involved by the fire is high- Fig. 11 shows the final deformed shapes for the first three
lighted. From that scenario, it is also possible to evaluate how scenarios, in which there are columns involved in the fire.
the structure seems to retain a good bearing capacity, even Finally, Fig. 12 summarizes the deformed shape, the criti-
when there are large displacements on the secondary beams. cal time and temperatures for each considered scenario, lo-
This is because the damage is localized and does not compro- cating in Scenario 1 the worst case for the stability of this
mise the stability of the whole structure. We can conclude that, structure subjected to fire, having the lowest critical time and
in performance fire analyses, the global behavior of the struc- temperature of fire resistance.
1° SCENARIO 2° SCENARIO
3° SCENARIO 4° SCENARIO
Fig. 12. Summary of critical states for the four scenarios considered here