Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Video-Aided Self-Reflection A Pedagogical Tool in Teaching Biology
Video-Aided Self-Reflection A Pedagogical Tool in Teaching Biology
1, MARCH, 2020
SHIELA M. ACEVEDA
http://orcid.org/: 0000-0003-3994-0764
shiela.aceveda001@deped.gov.ph
Governor Feliciano Leviste Memorial National High School
Lemery, Batangas, Philippines
ABSTRACT
Advancement and evolution of different kinds of gadgets, mobile phones, laptops and computers are
highly appreciated by most of the students today. These become effective tools to enhance their
motivation and active engagement inside the classroom. However, these also change the continuity of
lesson because students confine themselves in using gadgets and playing mobile games at home.
Decline in students’ performance becomes visible. In educational system where technology cannot be
withdrawn, an intensive effort of a teacher to integrate it constructively can revamp technology as an
effective tool for learning. With this explosive space of change and development, the researcher
decided to check out the effectiveness of video as a tool for learning in a form of video-aided self-
reflection in teaching Biology. The study used quasi-experimental research design. The participants of
this study were 100 Grade 8 students from two different sections handled by the researcher in the
School Year 2018-2019. A researcher- made pre-test was steered out to the controlled group and
experimental group at the beginning of the fourth quarter. Controlled group used traditional means of
self-reflection while the experimental group used video-aided self-reflection. At the end of the quarter
the same test was administered to both controlled and experimental group. Mean, standard deviation
and t-test were used as statistical tools to navigate the results of the study. Findings revealed that
both groups showed differences in their score implying that they had different level of performance in
Biology after the utilization of video-aided self-reflection. This revealed that the use of video-aided self-
reflection was an effective pedagogical tool in teaching Biology.
The study used quasi-experimental This part deals with the presentation,
research design. The participants were tested in analysis and interpretation of data gathered to
the controlled condition and experimental answer the specific questions posted in the
condition. Both control and experimental groups objectives of the study.
were compared, however, the groups were
chosen and assigned out of convenience 1. Performance of the Controlled and
rather than through randomization. The Experimental Group of Students in Pre-
participants were asked to participate in a one test in Biology
quarter program. The students’ pre-test score
prior to the start of the implementation of the In every subject area, teachers must first
pedagogical tool was measured and then again determine the level of students’ performance
after the implementation. Two sections were before beginning the chapter of every topic. This
used: one acted as control group and the other is to effectively target the area needed by the
acted as treatment group. The participants of learners. In this study, the researcher used the
this study were 100 Grade 8 students from two pretest to determine the level of performance of
different sections handled by the researcher in the two groups of student-respondents of the
the School Year 2018-2019. Fifty students from study.
section American Robin were the controlled Table 1 shows the computed mean and
group and another 50 students from section standard deviation to describe students’
Egret were under the experimental group. performance in their pre-test. Findings revealed
These sections were selected due to their same that controlled group obtained the highest score
performance in science in the previous grading.
P – ISSN 2651 - 7701 | E – ISSN 2651 – 771X | www.ioer-imrj.com
ACEVEDA, S. M., Video-Aided Self-Reflection a Pedagogical Tool in Teaching Biology, pp.84 – 90 86
3
IOER INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL, VOL. 2, NO. 1, MARCH, 2020
of 21 and the lowest score was one. The two groups did not differ significantly in their
computed mean of this group was 8.1 with performance in relation to their pre-test.
standard deviation of 2.74. The experimental
group had the highest score of 17 and the Table 2
lowest score was zero. Significant Difference in the Pre-Test Results of the Two
Groups of students.
Table 1 t- p-
Performance of the Controlled and Experimental Group of tc value value Decision Interpretation
Students in Pre-test in Biology Pre Not
Test 2.01 1.59 0.118 Accepted significant
Paired
Samples N HS LS Mean SD
Controlled
Meanwhile, the computed p-value of
Group 50 21 1 8.1 2.74 0.118 associated with the test statistics was
Experimental higher than the level of significance set in the
Group 50 17 0 6.4 2.34 study (p>0.05), therefore, the difference in the
mean pre-test scores of the two groups of
This group of students garnered the participants was not significant. In view of these,
mean of 6.4 and standard deviation of 2.34. The the null hypothesis of no significant difference in
computed mean value of controlled and the mean scores of the controlled and
experimental group showed that their experimental group was accepted for the pre-
performance in pre-test in Biology was relatively test result in Biology. This result implies that at
low. This implies that there was a need to provide the start of the study, the prior knowledge
students with intervention to increase and students were low. To enhance students’
deepen their skills and knowledge and to provide performance in Biology there is a great need to
them the needed support to make progress. provide students with appropriate intervention
According to Shukla (2015) to increase students’ suitable for the learning needs of the students. In
motivation in learning there is a need to apply line with the findings was the study of
trendy and fashionable means of learning. Linnnansaari et al. (2015) which found out that
Integration of technology in providing students overall interest in Biology is positive but
intervention has great impact on students’ not high. Hence, there was a need to have high
performance. level of interest and motivation so that
engagement will rise which will result to the
2. Significant Difference in the Pre-test
Results of the Two Groups of Students improvement of students’ performance.
Based on the findings and results the Scott, S.E., Kucan, L., Correnti, R. & Miller, L.A.
following recommendations are given: (2013). Using video records to mediate
teaching interns’ critical reflection. Journal of
1. The strategy may be used in other areas Technology and Teacher Education, 21(1),
of science. 119-
2. Teachers may be equipped with ICT 145.https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/40
skills to address the needs of the 21st 547/.
century learners.
3. All schools may be provided with the Shukla, A. (2015). Constructivism and Integration of
information and communication ICT: Powerful Blend of Teaching-Learning
technology facilities to maximize Process. International Journal of Sciences,
students’ learning. 1(1),82-90.
4. Further study may be conducted to https://grdspublishing.org/index.php/people/ar
validate the effectiveness of video-aided ticle/view/217
self-reflection in teaching.
Smith, S. (2015). (Re)Counting meaningful learning
experiences: Using student-created reflective
REFERENCES videos to make invisible learning visible during
PjBL experiences. Interdisciplinary Journal of
Ayan, D. (2010). Promoting EFL Pre-service
Problem-Based
Teachers’ Self-directed Learning Through
Electronic Portfolios, Unpublished Master’s Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-
Thesis, Middle East Technical University, 5015.1541
Ankara, Turkey
Xiao, B., & Tobin, J. (2018). The use of video as a
Coffey, A. M. (2014). Using Video to Develop Skills tool for reflection with preservice
in Reflection in Teacher Education Students. teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher
Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 328-
Education,39(9). 345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1
https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n9.7
516705
DO 42, S. 2016 – Policy guidelines on daily lesson
preparation for the K to 12 basic education
P – ISSN 2651 - 7701 | E – ISSN 2651 – 771X | www.ioer-imrj.com
ACEVEDA, S. M., Video-Aided Self-Reflection a Pedagogical Tool in Teaching Biology, pp.84 – 90
6
89
IOER INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL, VOL. 2, NO. 1, MARCH, 2020
AUTHOR’S PROFILE
COPYRIGHTS