Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter-1: Working Capital
Chapter-1: Working Capital
1. Introduction:
Working Capital:
In simple terms working capital means that the amount of funds that a business require
finance for its day-to-day operations of the business and hence it is considered as the life
blood of any business. It is an excess of current assets over current liabilities. In other words
the amount of current assets which is more than current liabilities is known as working
capital. If current liabilities are nil then, working capital will equal to current assets. It shows
strength of business in short period of time. If a company have some amount in the form of
working capital, it means Company have liquid assets, with this money company can face
every crises position in market. Working capital management involves managing the
relationship between a firm’s short term assets and its short-term liabilities. The management
of working capital assumes great importance because shortage of working capital funds is
perhaps the biggest possible cause of failure of many business units in recent times. There it
is of great importance on the part of management to pay particular attention to the planning
and control for working capital. Sometimes, if creditors demand their money from company,
at that time company's high working capital saves company from that situation. We know that
selling of current assets is easy in small period of time but Company cannot sell their fixed
assets with in small period of time. So, if Company has sufficient working capital, Company
can easily pay off the creditors and create his reputation in market. But if a company has zero
working capital and then company cannot pay creditors in emergency time and either
company becomes bankrupt or takes loan at higher rate of Interest. In both condition, it is
very dangerous and always Company's Account Manager tries to keep some amount of
working capital for creating goodwill in market.
Aluminium:
Aluminium occurs in abundance on the surface of the earth. It is available in various forms
such as oxides, sulphates, silicates, phosphate, etc. But is commercially produced mainly
from Bauxite. It is one of the most common non-ferrous metals and it is used for a range of
particular applications. These include , utilization in the aerospace industry , food and drink
packaging/storage , kitchen wear , electronics , construction , automotive industry , shipping
and many more too numerous to list. Aluminium is the third most abundant element (after
oxygen and silicon) and the most abundant metal, in the Earth’s crust. It makes up about 8%
by weight of the Earth’s solid surface. Aluminium surface can be reinforced to protect from
weather and chemical corrosion. Aluminium is equivalent in conductance while being 50%
lighter. Aluminium permits rapid heat dissipation. The metal and its sources are non-toxic
and it is, therefore, an important packaging material for food. Many possibilities are available
for treating and texturing aluminum surface.
In the last several years, aluminium has accelerated its applications in a multiple of
sectors by replacing other metals. The demand of aluminium is based on its enviable
combination properties. While rate of growth in other countries is low due to the fact that
they have reached towards the peak, the same in Asia and in particular India is increasing.
Presently the per capita consumption of aluminium in India is only 0.5 kg compared to 32 kg
in Japan, 27 kg in USA and 3.6 kg in Brazil.
NALCO:
The discovery of over one billion tones of bauxite deposits in the east coast of India in the
mid-seventies has placed India on the world bauxite map. As a major step towards exploiting
these vast bauxite deposits, the Government of India established National Aluminium
Company Limited (NALCO) as a public sector enterprise on January 7, 1981, with its
registered office at Bhubaneswar. The foundation stone of the project was laid by the Prime
Minister of India, Late Mrs. Indira Gandhi on March 29, 1981 at Damanjodi in the tribal
District of Koraput, Odisha. It is Asia’s largest integrated aluminium complex, encompassing
bauxite mining, alumina refining, aluminium smelting and casting, power generation, rail and
port facilities. The NALCO has won many laurels including Star Trading House Status,
APEXIL Awards etc. in 1998. The profit of the NALCO has steadily increased from Rs.19
crore in 1988-89 to Rs.1342 Crore (PAT) in 2017-18.
NALCO is a Navratna CPSE under ministry of Mines. The company is a group ‘A’
CPSE , having integrated and diversified operations in mining , metal and power. The
company has a 68.25 lakh TPA Bauxite mine and 21.00 lakh TPA (normative capacity)
Alumina Refinery located at Damanjodi in Karaput district of Odisha and 4.60 lakh TPA
Aluminium smelter and 1200MW captive power plant located at Angul , Odisha.
NALCO is the first Public Sector NALCO in the country to venture into international
market in a big way with London Metal Exchange (LME) registration since May, 1989. The
NALCO is listed at Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) since 1992 and National Stock Exchange
(NSE) since 1999. Besides, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18000 & SA 8000 certification;
the NALCO has also adopted ISO 50001 standards for energy management system.
2. Objective:
3. Literature Review:
Smith Keith V. (1973) believes that Research which concerns shorter range or working
capital decision making would appear to have been less productive. The inability of financial
managers to plan and control properly the current assets and current liabilities of their
respective firms has been the probable cause of business failure in recent years. Current
assets collectively represent the single largest investment for many firms, while current
liabilities account for a major part of total financing in many instances. This paper covers
eight distinct approaches to working capital management. The first three - aggregate
guidelines, constraints set and cost balancing are partial models; two other approaches -
probability models and portfolio theory, emphasize future uncertainty and interdepencies
while the remaining three approaches - mathematical programming, multiple goals and
financial simulation have a wider systematic focus.
Natarajan Sundar (1980) is of the opinion that working capital is important at both, the
national and the corporate level. Control on working capital at the national level is exercised
primarily through credit controls. The Tandon Study Group has provided a comprehensive
operational framework for the same. In operational terms, efficient working capital consists
of determining the optimum level of working capital, financing it imaginatively and
exercising control over it. He concludes that at the corporate level investment in working
capital is as important as investment in fixed assets. And especially for a company which is
not growing, survival will be possible only so long as it can match increase in operational
cost with improved operational efficiency, one of the most important aspects of which is
management of working capital.
Singh (1988) studies on Managing Working Capital by Strategic Choice is innovative one
which effectively requires an understanding of the processes underlying the cash cycle.
Managers project and evaluate working capital needs using three different approaches —
industry norms, economic model, and strategic choice. Singh illustrates the processes
underlying working capital flow and discusses the problems in each of the three approaches
to managing working capital. Some companies have shifted to using the strategic choice
approach to gain competitive advantage. To solve the working capital related problem he has
targeted the following objectives: to know the risk in WCM i.e. Liquidity Risk, Risk of
opportunity Loss, Delay centers.
Zaman M. (1991) studies the working capital management practices of Public Sector Jute
Enterprises in Bangladesh which have been found to be seriously affected. This has been
attributed to several factors like low demand for jute goods and serious competition in the
international market, insufficient inventory management policy, poor collection policy and
inefficient cash policy. The author has formulated a long term flexible and operational
working capital management model. In conclusion he has suggested the model which would
certainly help improve the working capital management practices of the jute industry in
particular and other public enterprises as well in Bangladesh.
Peel et al (1996) submitted that for small companies to manage and control their working
capital effectively; both internal and external working capital drivers must be taken into
consideration, and also consideration of how sensitive such drivers are to changes in the
business or market. Thus, a firm must be able to minimise inventory, control supply and
apply payment pressure on customers. Due to inefficient management of working capital,
many corporations lose billions annually. A good example is the study published by REL
Consultancy Group on IT companies in 2002. . A problem that is exacerbated when the
economy worsens as it did during 2001. REL examined operational data from 90 of the
largest publicly traded IT companies in the United States, with annual minimum revenue of
$450 million. It took the companies an average of 69 days to convert sales into cash in 2001,
nine days longer than the average in 2000, a lag that cost $10 billion in lost cash flow,
according to REL. This is to say, vendors took longer to collect on their sales.
Hossain Saiyed Zabid and Akon Md. Habibur Rahman (1997) emphasise the basic
objective of working capital management i.e., to arrange the needed working capital funds at
the right time, at right cost and from right source with a view to achieving a trade-off between
liquidity and profitability. The analysis reveals that BTMC had followed an aggressive
working capital financing policy taking the risk of liquidity. There was uninterrupted
increasing trend in negative net working capital throughout the period of the study which
suggested that BTMC had exploited the entire short-term sources available to it without
considering the actual needs.
Ahmed Habib (1998) points out that when the interest rate is included; money loses its
predictive power on output. The study explicates this finding by using a rational expectations
model where production decisions of firm required debt finance working capital. Working
capital is an important factor and its cost, the rate of interest, affects the supply of goods by
firms. Monetary policy shocks, thus, affect the interest rate and the supply side, and as a
result price and output produced by firms. The model indicates that this can cause the
predictive power of monetary shocks on output to diminish when the interest rate is used in
empirical analysis. The model also alludes to the effects of monetary policy on the price level
through the supply side (cost push) factors.
Shin and Soenen (1998) pointed out a firm‘s working capital results from the time lag
between the expenditure for the purchase of raw materials and the collection from sale of
finished goods. According to their submission, this entails various areas of company‘s
operational management that includes receivables, inventories management, management and
use of trade credit, etc.
Batra G. S. and Sharma A. K. (1999) analyze the working capital position of Goetze (I)
Ltd. with the help of various ratios. They are of the view that the working capital position in
the company is quite satisfactory although they have suggested a few measures for further
improvement in management of working capital, like necessity of greater attention in the
inventory control; active sales department, speedy dispatch of orders and reduction of
dependency on trade creditors.
Garg Pawan Kumar (1999) suggests that working capital should be financed with both the
sources – long-term as well as short-term sources of funds. He further suggests that
permanent working capital should be obtained with the help of long-term sources of finance
while variable/ fluctuating working capital should be collected through short-term sources of
finance. Efficient utilization of working capital enhances operating efficiency as well as
income of the units.
Jain P. K. and Yadav Surendra S. (2001) study the corporate practices related to
management of working capital in India, Singapore and Thailand. In this paper the authors
have tried to understand the working capital management and current assets and current
liabilities, and their inter-relationship. Further the authors have shown an aggregative analysis
of current assets and current liabilities in terms of major liquidity ratios. It also states working
capital position in terms of these ratios pertaining to various industries. From the paper one
can infer that the available data in respect of the sample companies from the three countries
confirm the wide inter-industry variations in liquidity ratios. Towards the end, the authors
suggest that serious consideration needs to be given by the respective governments as well as
industry groups in these three countries in order to take corrective measures to take care of
and rectify the areas of concern.
Howorth Carole and Westhead Paul (2003) have tried to find out the working capital
management routines of a large random sample of small companies in the UK. Considerable
variability in the take-up of eleven working capital management routines was detected.
Principal components analysis and cluster analysis confirmed the identification of four
distinct ‘types’ of companies with regard to the patents of working capital management.
While the first three ‘types’ of companies focused upon cash management, stock or debtors
routines respectively, the fourth ‘type’ was less likely to take-up any working capital
management routines. The objective of the study is to encourage additional research rather
than to provide an exhaustive overview of all the factors associated with the take-up of
working capital management routines by small companies. The results suggest that small
companies focus only on areas of working capital management where they expect to improve
marginal returns.
Meszek Wieslaw and Polewski Marcin (2006) examine the profiles of selected
construction companies from the viewpoint of working capital formation and their
management strategies applied to working capital. The analysis is based on the financial
ratios. The authors conclude with the observation that complex working capital management
requires controlling methodology to be developed. A specific character of the construction
industry, including operational factors and market requirements make working capital
management a task exceeding the financial sphere, as it embraces the issues of organization
of investment processes, the organization of production processes and logistics.
Dinesh M. (2008) explicates the concepts of working capital, the different challenges being
faced by the business firms in managing working capital and the strategies to be adopted for
its prudent management. The author concludes with the view that most of the businesses
failed not for want of profit but for lack of cash. The fast growth in production and sales may
cause the business to utilize all of the financial resources seeking growth and making assets
such as inventories, accounts receivable and other assets as more illiquid.
Dr.Khatik S. K. and Jain Rashmi (2009) state that the management of working capital is
one of the most important and key resources of an organization for its day-to-day operations.
Working capital can be taken as funding resources for routine activities of business. It is the
most vital and important part of fund management and profitability for business. The writer
has analyzed the working capital position of MPSEB (Madhya Pradesh State Electricity
Board) by ratio analysis technique and it was found that the position of current ratio, quick
ratio, acid-test ratio, working capital ratio, inventory turnover ratio are not up to the standard
benchmark.
Narender, Menon and Shwetha (2009) focuses on the Factors Determining Working
Capital Management in Cement Industry. This paper investigates the use of net liquid balance
(NLB) and working capital requirement (WCR) as measures of investing Working Capital
Management of the industry. The authors studied the effect of dependent variable i.e. WCR
and NLB that are influenced significantly by the size, debt-equity ratio, business indicator,
firm performance, growth of the firm, operating cash flow. A sample of 50 companies has
been considered for the purpose of the study. The data consist of companies in cement
industry for period of ten years commencing from 1995 to 2006. The results of the study
show that NLB is affected by two independent factors such as size and debt-equity ratio. On
the one hand the WCR is considered as dependent variable where as the independent factors
that impact significantly are size of the firm, operating cash flow, business indicator, growth
of the firm. From the study it can be concluded that only the size of the firm affects both of
the NLB and WCR in the company‘s working Capital management.
Ramudu(2009) conducted an empirical study on Working Capital Structure and Liquidity
position of Indian Commercial Vehicles Industry. As working capital plays a key role in the
process of wealth maximization of shareholders, so the author attempted to study the
effectiveness of structuring the working capital. The data relating to six variables such as
current ratio, quick ratio, ratio of current ratio to total sales, current assets turnover ratio, and
working capital turnover ratio, for a period of ten years (1995-2004) were used for the
purpose of the analysis. Applying statistical tools like average, correlation and one-way
ANOVA in the study, he concluded that inventories formed the highest percentage in the
working capital structure followed by trade receivables and loans and advances whereas cash
and bank balances formed very negligible part. Further, the study revealed the variation
between current assets turnover ratio and working capital turnover ratio was very high across
the industry, which in turn, implies the sample companies achieved higher sales with less
working capital.
Bardia and Kastia(2010) carried out a comparative study with respect to liquidity
management in two leading pharmaceuticals of India, Torrent Pharma and Cipla. It covers a
period of nine years (2000-01 to 2008-09) and uses six different liquidity ratios such as
current ratio, quick ratio, inventory turnover ratio, debtor turnover ratio, current assets
turnover ratio, working capital turnover ratio. The study result reveals that both the
companies are following more or less same working capita practice. However credit and
collection policy of Torrent is more effective than Cipla.
Chawala, Harkwat and Khairnar (2010), studies on Working capital management and its
impact on profitability of the firm is a comprehensive one in the field of working capital
management. In this study, they have selected a sample of 3 firms from petrochemical
industry for a period of 5 years from 2004-2009. They have studied the effect of different
variable of working capital management including the average collection period, inventory
turnover in days, average payment period, cash conversion cycle (CCC) and current ratio on
the gross operating profitability of the firms. Person‘s correlation and linear regression t-test
are used for analysis. The results show that there is a strong negative relationship between
variables of the working capital management (WCM) and profitability of the firm. It means
that as the cash conversion cycle increases it will lead to decreasing profitability of the firm,
and managers can create a positive value for the shareholders by reducing the cash
conversion cycle to a possible minimum level. They found that there is a significant negative
relationship between liquidity and profitability. They also found that there is a negative
relationship between net working capital of the firm and its profitability.
Negi. Sankpal, Chakraborty and Mathur (2010) carried out a study on Working Capital
Management and firm‘s performance considering sample size of fifty manufacturing
companies. The period of study was for five years i.e. from 2003- 2008. The study was
carried out by developing a regression model where operating profit margin is taken as
dependent variable where as asset turnover ratio debt to total asset ratio current asset to total
asset ratio, trade debtor to current asset ratio, current liability to total asset ratio, no. of
inventory days, no. of days for accounts payable, current asset to current liabilities are
considered as independent variable. The findings of the study indicate that current asset to
total asset, total debtors to total asset and inventory days are directly related variables with
working capital management and have significantly negative effects on firm profitability.
Agarwal (2011) carried out an empirical study on the management of working capital in
Maruti Suzuki India Limited. Considering the data for a period of 9 years, the author focuses
on the relationship between liquidity and profitability and risk. The study result discloses that
there is no relation between profitability and liquidity while profitability has a positive
relationship with risk. This indicates that the firm gives little importance to the liquidity
issues related with working capital management.
Jain,Singh and Kapoor(2011) carried out a study on the working capital management
practices in Reliance Industries Limited. Covering the period of ten years i.e. from 2001-2009
they sought to analyse the significance of debtor, cash, loans & advances, inventory and their
Turnover Ratios in the management of working capital. The study also focuses on the
practice of zero working capital in Reliance Industries. The study result concluded that RIL
has maintained satisfactory liquidity ratio, and at the same time, the components of current
assets have not occupied substantial share, vis-a-vis, its total sales which may be an
indication of its efficiency in managing its working capital.
Rahman Mohammad M. (2011) focuses on the co-relation between working capital and
profitability. An effective working capital management has a positive impact on profitability
of firms. From the study it is seen that in the textile industry profitability and working capital
management position are found to be up to the mark.
Dr Panigrahi Ashok Kumar (2012) studies the relationship between working capital
management and profitability of ACC Cement Company, the leading cement manufacturer of
the country for assessing the impact of working capital management on profitability during
the period 1999-2000 to 2009-10. The study is based on secondary data. The main objective
of the study was to find whether the working capital management affects the performance of
the firm. It can be deduced that there is a moderate relationship between working capital
management and the firm’s profitability.
Kushalappa S.and Kunder Sharmila (2012) closely study the relationship between working
capital management policies and profitability of the thirteen listed manufacturing firms in
Ghana. At the end of the study, a significantly negative relationship between profitability and
accounts receivable days is found to exist. Profitability is significantly positively influenced
by the firm’s cash conversion cycle (CCC), current assets ratio and current asset turnover. It
is also suggested that managers can create value for the shareholders by creating incentives to
reduce their accounts receivable to 30 days.
Turan M. S., Bamal Sucheta, Vashist Babita and Turan Nidhi (2013) attempt to examine
the relationship between working capital management and profitability by making an inter
sector comparison of two manufacturing industries i.e. Chemical industries and
Pharmaceutical industries. 50 companies from each sector based on market capitalization and
listed on BSE and 500 indices were selected for the research for the period from 2002 to
2011. At the end of the analysis it was concluded that in spite of similar nature of both the
industries in the manufacturing sector, working capital management variables affect
profitability indices more strongly in the chemical industry than in the pharmaceutical
industry. It was also observed that both the industries have a significant relationship between
profitability and working capital management variables. Besides, working capital
management variables affect more strongly the profitability indices of chemical industry than
those of pharmaceutical industry.
Kaur Harsh V. and Singh Sukhdev (2013) analyse empirically BSE 200 manufacturing
companies spread over 19 industries for the period 2000 to 2010. The study explores scope to
increase the efficiency and profitability of 145 companies by improving the parameters of
analysis. The study tests the relationship between the working capital score and profitability
measured by income to current assets and income to average total assets. This article
concentrates on cash conversion efficiency and planning the operating cycle days. At the end,
the study emphasizes that efficient management of working capital significantly affects
profitability.
Akoto Richard K., Vitor Dadson A. and Angmor Peter L. (2013) closely study the
relationship between working capital management policies and profitability of the thirteen
listed manufacturing firms in Ghana. At the end of the study, a significantly negative
relationship between profitability and accounts receivable days is found to exist. Profitability
is significantly positively influenced by the firm’s cash conversion cycle (CCC), current
assets ratio and current asset turnover. It is also suggested that managers can create value for
the shareholders by creating incentives to reduce their accounts receivable to 30 days.
3. Research Methodology:
This project is carried out by considering NALCO as the sample unit which is the largest
aluminium producer in India. The report is completely based on the data collected from the
secondary source which includes Annual Report of the company and collected from
NALCO website etc. The data were processed and analysed using MS Excel. The whole
study is based on secondary data of National Aluminium Company Limited and two of its
units, mine and Refinery plant situated at Damanjodi.
Sampling:
Sampling refers to the process through which the population is presented in a study , whereby
a small selection is made to give a depiction of the entire population profile. Sampling is
necessary when there is a challenge in collecting and analysing data from each single member
of the population, whether they are objects, people or organisations. In the present case,
sampling helps reduce the time and cost it would take to investigate the entire population of
NALCO.
Time period:
In order to accomplish the present study the data have been taken for a period of 6 years i.e
from 2012-13 to 2017-18.
Types of Research:
Types of research are very important to research something in the company or somewhere
else. There are many researches which suits for different areas to find out the problems in an
organisation. I have been used two types of Researches for my project work that is historical
Research and quantitative Research.
Historical Research:
Through historical research I have found the growth strategy of NALCO and its actual
progress towards achievement that.
Quantitative research:
This research has been undertaken to measure the quantity or amount of the company.
I glanced at company’s Balance sheet and profit and loss account to have an idea of
the financial performance of NALCO since last 6 years.
Sources of data collection:
a. Annual Report of NALCO , Damanjodi.
b. Annual Audited Accounts.
c. Balance Sheet.
d. Profit and Loss Accounts.
Tools and Techniques:
CHAPTER – 2
Every running business needs working capital. Even a business which is fully equipped
with all types of fixed assets required is bound to collapse without
adequate supply of raw materials for processing;
cash to pay for wages, power and other costs;
The ability to grant credit to its customers.
All these require working capital. Working capital is thus like the lifeblood of a business.
The business will not be able to carry on day- to-day activities without the availability of
adequate working capital.
While managing the working capital, two characteristics of current assets should be kept in
mind viz. (a) short life span, and (b) swift transformation into other form of current assets.
Each constituent of current asset has comparatively very short life span. Investment remains
in a particular form of current assets for a short period. The life span of current assets depend
upon the time required in the activities of procurement; production, sales and collection and
degree of synchronization among them. A very short life span of current assets results into
swift transformation into other form of current assets for a running business.
Working capital management has a significant role in financial management due to
the fact it plays a pivotal role in keeping the wheels of a business enterprise running. In
common, the management of current assets is called the Working Capital Management. In
any business firm whether it is a trading business or a manufacturing business, they need
some asset, in terms of money. As we know that money is the lifeblood of any business,
shortage of funds for working capital has caused many businesses to fail and in many cases
has retarded their growth. Lack of efficient and effective utilization of working capital leads
to earn low rate of return on capital employed or even compel sustain losses. The need for
skill working capital management has become greater in recent years. These assets may be
for short term or temporary purpose or long-term purposes. Long-term funds may be required
for many purposes like acquisition of fixed asset, diversification and expansion of business
on modernization of plants and machinery and research and development. But funds are also
needed for short-term purposes i.e for day-to-day requirement. We will hardly find that any
business does not require any amount of working capital for its normal operations. The
requirements of working capital varies from firm to firm, its dependence upon the nature of
the business like production policies, market conditions, season ability of operations,
conditions of supplies, etc. Working capital is used for procurement of raw materials,
payment of wages to workmen and for meeting the routine expenses.
As well all know that only a successful sales progress can earn profit for the business but
these days credit system is prevailing in the present competitive market. So the sale is not
converted into cash instantly. This system requires some times lag between sales of goods
and receipt of payment. So need for short term funds in the form of current assets are required
in case of lack of immediate realization of cash against goods sold. Another problem may
arise if the finished goods are in the stocks and within the given period it could not be sold
and some goods like raw materials, semi finished goods are also in the stock and hence funds
are blocked in different types of inventory. For the successful running of the business, it
require sufficient amount of funds. So the management of these funds or current assets is
termed as Working Capital Management is carried out effectively, efficiently and consistently
will assure the health of an organisation.
2. Meaning of Working Capital:
Working capital is defined as the “excess of current assets over current liabilities”.
a) Current Assets:
Current assets are those assets that will be converted into cash within the current
accounting period or within the next years as a result of ordinary operations of the
business.
Resources of current assets:-
Cash and bank balance
Trade receivables
Period expenses
Short term advances
Temporary investments
Cash is used for purchasing the raw materials, to pay wages and other manufacturing things.
After manufacturing the product, finished goods are put in the stock-in- inventory and then
goods will be sold for the receivable accounts.
b) Current Liabilities:
Current liabilities are those debts of the firm that have to be paid during the current
accounting period or within a year. Current liabilities includes:-
Creditors for goods purchased
Outstanding expenses
Short term borrowing
Advance received against sales
Taxes and Dividends payable
Other liabilities maturing within a year
3. Classification of Working Capital:
Working capital can be classified into two ways:-
I. On the basis of concept
II. On the basis of time
I. On the basis of concept:
On the basis of concept working capital is classified as:
i. Gross working capital
ii. Net working capital
(i) Gross Working Capital:
The term Gross Working Capital is referred to the firm’s investment in current assets.
(ii) Net Working Capital:
The term “Net Woking Capital” can be defined into two ways i.e
It is the difference between current assets and current liabilities.
Net working capital is that portion of a firm’s assets which is financed with long-
term funds. As we know that the task of financial manager is to manage the
working capital efficiently to ensure sufficient liquidity of any business firm is
measured by its ability to satisfy short-term obligations as they become due.
II. On the basis of time:
On the basis of time the working capital may be classified as:
i. Permanent or fixed working capital
ii. Temporary or variable working capital
(i) Permanent or Fixed Working Capital:
Permanent or fixed working capital is the minimum amount that is required to ensure
effective utilisation of fixed facilities and for maintaining the circulation of current assets.
There is always a minimum level of current assets, which is continuously required by the
enterprise to carry out its normal business operations.
This minimum level of current assets is called permanent or fixed working capital as this
part of capital is permanently blocked in current assets. As the business grows, the
requirement of permanent working capital also increases due to the increase in current assets.
The permanent working capital can be further classified as regular working capital and
reserve working capital required to ensure circulation of current assets from cash to
inventories, from inventories to receivables and from receivables to cash and so on. Reserve
working capital is the excess amount over the requirement for regular working capital that
may arise at unstated periods such as strikes, rise in prices, depression, etc.
There are five important sources of permanent or long term working capital:-
(a) Shares:-
Issue of shares is the most important sources for raising the permanent or long-term
capital. A company can issue various types of shares as equity shares, preference shares and
deferred shares. Preference shares carry preferential rights in respect of dividend at fixed rate
and in regard to the repayment of capital at the time of winding up of the company. Equity
shares do not have any fixed commitment charge and the dividend in these shares is to be
paid subject to the availability of sufficient profits.
(b) Debentures:-
A debenture is an instrument issued by the company acknowledging its debt to its holder.
The debenture holders are the creditors of the company. A fixed rate of interest is paid on
debentures. The interest on debenture is a charge against profit and loss account. The
debentures may be of various kinds such as simple, unsecured debentures, secured or
mortgaged debentures, redeemable debentures, irredeemable debentures, convertible
debentures and non-convertible debentures.
(c) Public Deposits:-
Public deposits are the fixed deposits accepted by a business enterprise directly from
the public. Public deposits as a source of finance have a number of advantages such as very
simple and convenient source of finance, taxation benefits, trading on equity, low need of
securities and an inexpensive source of finance but it is not free from danger such as
uncertain, unreliable, unsound and inelastic source of finance.
(d) Ploughing Back of Profits:-
It means the reinvestments by concern of its surplus earnings in its business. It is an
internal source of finance and is most suitable for an established firm for its expansion,
modernization and replacement. The various advantages are cheaper; there is no need to keep
securities; there is no dilution of control; it ensures stable dividend policy and gains
confidence of the public.
(e) Loans from Financial Institution:-
Financial institutions such as Commercial Bank, Life Insurance Corporation, etc. provide
short-term, medium-term and long-term loans. This source of finance is more suitable to meet
the medium-term demand of working capital. Interest is charged on such loans at a fixed rate
and the amount of the loan is to be repaid by way of instalments in a number of years.
Research Type:
This Research is purely based on Secondary Research.
Ratio Analysis:
Ratio analysis is the powerful tool of financial statements analysis. A ratio is define as
“the indicated quotient of two mathematical expressions” and as “the relationship between
two or more things”. The absolute figures reported in the financial statement do not provide
meaningful understanding of the performance and financial position of the firm. Ratio helps
to summaries large quantities of financial data and to make qualitative judgment of the firm’s
financial performance.
First of all, various components of working capital as taken from the financial statements of
NALCO for the 6 years is studied.
1. CURRENT ASSETS:
a) Inventories:
(Rs in Crores)
AMOUNTS
1,000.00
800.00
1,380.64
600.00 1,173.66 1,165.56 1,126.97 1,155.93 1,194.08
400.00
200.00
0.00
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-1
Analysis: Here the figure no.1 shows that the total inventory on NALCO was maximum in
the year 2012-13 while it was minimum in the year 2015-16. However, otherwise the trend of
inventories over the period remains same. Overall, the picture depicts a healthy figure.
b) Trade receivables:
(Rs in crores)
TRADE RECEIVABLES
300
250
200
AMOUNTS
150
243.57 258.13
235.21
100 184.25
142.99 120.82
50
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-2
Analysis: Here figure no.2 shows that the trade receivables were less in the year 2014-15 and
it was highest in the year 2017-18. The sale of goods (Alumina and Aluminium) is made
against either advances received from customer letter of credit. The advance received from
customer is adjusted on supply of material. There is no credit period allowed for such sales
and accordingly no interest is charged. The average credit period for sale of wind power is 30
days from the date of metering which is considered as collection period.
So, the trade receivables mostly constitutes wind power sale and income from other sources
like rent or electricity charges for shops given on rent in townships. The portion of trade
receivables is very negligible in relation to the turnover. The company is able to sell its core
products in cash and it is healthy sign for the company.
3,000.00
4,627.98 4,933.53
2,000.00 4,048.29
3,504.38
2,287.23 2,768.95
1,000.00
0.00
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-3
Analysis: Here the figure no. 3 show, if we see the cash and bank balance, in 2015-16, there
were surplus funds in the company’s account. These surplus funds of Rs 4933.53 Crores was
deposited as term deposit for its utilization in the future. It was deposited as short term
deposits so that the company could earn some interest. If the money would have been
deposited in current account, the company would not have earned any interest. However, the
cash & bank balance is 2016-17 has been drastically reduced to 2287.23 crores. This has
resulted because of high dividend payment of Rs 541.22 crores in 2016-17 and buyback of
share worth Rs 2835 crores. The excessive cash was distributed among the owners and even
after that the cash balance looks attractive. The company’s cash position is very healthy.
Figure no:-4
Analysis: Here the figure no.4, other current assets are highest in the year 2017-18. It
includes investments made in mutual funds and joint ventures. The same figure in the year
2012-13 is lowest. The reason being the current investment in 2016-17 stands out at Rs
592.96 crores.
There are another two most important items in other current assets, which contributes,
maximum towards this. Those are income tax receivables and payments towards sales tax /
VAT demand.
400
300 607.54 586.67
525 481.38
200
100 193.19 181.84
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no: 5
Analysis : Here the figure no: 5 show, the loans to employees has increased from Rs 525
Crores in 2012-13 to Rs 586.67 Crores in 2015-16. Normally, the company gives loans to
employees so as to maintain a good social relationship with the employees. If the employees
get easy loans from the company, this will help in increasing the productivity of the
company. The employees will be motivated and this will contribute towards the achievement
of company’s goal. However, in the year 2016-17 and 2017-18, this figure has been reduced
drastically to Rs 193.13 crores and Rs 181.84.
5000
4000 7426.2 7712.18
7075.81 7182.02
3000 5655.79 5613.9
2000
1000
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no: 6
Analysis: Here the figure no. 6 show, the total current assets have also increased from Rs
7075.81 Crores in 2012-13 to Rs. 7712.18 Crores in 2014-15and slightly it has decreased to
Rs. 7182.02 Crores in 2015-16. Then after in the year 2016-17 and 2017-18 again it has
decreased Rs. 5655.79 Crores and Rs 5613.90. The ratio of current assets to the total asset is
almost 40% in 2017-18, which depicts a healthy sign for the company.
2. CURRENT LIABILITIES:
2500
2000
AMOUNTS
1500
2545.75 2564.38
1000
1325.37 1350.45 1170.21
500
545.45
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-7
Analysis: In the figure no. 7, the current liabilities have slightly increased from Rs 2545.7
Crores in 2012-13 to Rs 2564.38 Crores in 2013-14. Then there was sharp decline in
liabilities i.e. from Rs 2564.38 Crores in 2013-14 to Rs 545.45 Crores in 2017-18. The
reduction in current liabilities is a very positive sign for the company as it is able to meet its
current obligations in time along with minimum impact on future.
b) Total Net Provision:-
(Rs in crores)
250
200 375.88
150 277.41
100 186.21
162.67 147.25
50 117.07
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-8
Analysis: Here in figure no. 8, the net provision has increased from Rs 162.67 Crores in
2012-13 to Rs 277.41 Crores in 2016-17 and it has decreased to Rs 117.07 Crores in 2016-17.
Again suddenly it has increased to Rs 375.88 in 2017-18.
2,000.00
1,500.00 3,211.93 3,242.75
2,651.93 2,440.93
1,000.00 1,967.04 2,209.24
500.00
0.00
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-9
Analysis:- In the figure no. 9, the total current Liabilities have slightly increased from Rs
3211.93 Crores in 2012-13 to Rs 3242.75 Crores in 2013-14. Then in suddenly decreased to
Rs 1967.04 Crores in 2014-15. Then again it increased to Rs 2651.93 Crores in 2016-17 and
slightly decreased to Rs 2440.93 crores in 2017-18. The major contributors to the increase in
current liability in 2016-17 is trade payables which is increased from Rs 640 crores in 2015-
16 to Rs 845 crores in 2016-17. Again, certain statutory obligations has also been increased
in 2016-17.
d) Working Capital:-
(Rs in crores)
Particulars 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Total current assets(A) 7075.81 7426.20 7712.18 7182.02 5655.79 5613.90
Total current liabilities(B) 3211.93 3242.75 1967.04 2209.24 2651.93 2440.93
Working Capital(A-B) 3863.88 4183.45 5745.14 4972.78 3003.86 3172.97
7000 WORKING CAPITAL
6000
5000
AMOUNTS
4000
3000 5745.14
4972.78
2000 3863.88 4183.45
3003.86 3172.97
1000
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-10
Analysis: One of the most important points in working capital management is to maintain the
levels of current assets twice the level of current liabilities. A weak liquidity position poses a
threat to the solvency of the company and makes it unsafe and unsound. A negative working
capital means a negative liquidity and may prove to be harmful for the company’s reputation.
Here, the figure.10, shows that the working capital was maximum in 2014-15 i.e. Rs 5745.14
Crores and the working capital was minimum in 2016-17 i.e. Rs 3003.86 Crores. There
should be neither excessive working capital nor inadequate working capital.
Liquidity ratio measures the ability of the firm to meet its current obligations
(liabilities). Liquidity ratio establishes a relationship between cash and other current assets to
current obligations, which will provide a quick measure of liquidity. The failure of a
company to meet its obligations due to lack of sufficient liquidity, will result in a poor credit
worthiness, loss of creditors’ confidence or even in legal tangles resulting in the closure of
the company. So it is necessary to strike a proper balance between high liquidity and lack of
liquidity.
Current ratio is the ratio of current assets of a business to its current liabilities. It is the most
widely used test of liquidity of a business and measures the ability of a business to repay its
debts over the period of next 12 months.
Formula:
Current ratio is calculated using the following formula:
Both the above figures can be obtained from the balance sheet of the business. Current
assets are the assets of a business expected to be converted to cash or used up in next 12
months or within the normal operating cycle of the business. Current liabilities on the other
hand are the obligations of a business which need to be settled within next 12 months or
within the normal operating cycle.
Figure no:-11
Analysis:-The current ratio is one of the best known measures of short term solvency. The
main question this ratio address is “Does your business have enough current assets to meet
the payment schedule of its current debts with a margin of safety for possible losses in current
assets?” The thumb rule 2:1 in current ratio is considered to be very ideal and satisfactory.
Seeing the figure no 11, it can be clearly seen that NALCO has always a better current ratio
and its short term liquidity position is very healthy.
Quick ratio is the ratio of the sum of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and
accounts receivable to the current liabilities of a business. It measures the ability of a
company to pay its debts by using its cash and near cash current assets (i.e. accounts
receivable and marketable securities).
Formula:
Quick ratio is calculated using the following formula:
Marketable securities are those securities which can be converted into cash quickly.
Examples of marketable securities are treasury bills, saving bills, shares of stock-exchange,
etc. Receivables refer to accounts receivable. Alternatively, quick ratio can also be calculated
using the following formula:
QUICK RATIO
3.5 3.33
3 2.74
2.5
PERCENTAGE
1.93 1.81
2
1.77 1.7
1.5
1
0.5
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-12
Analysis: Quick ratio establishes a relationship between quick or liquid assets and current
liabilities. An asset is liquid if it can be converted into cash immediately or reasonably soon
without a loss of value. Cash is the most liquid asset. Other assets that are considered to be
relatively liquid and included in quick assets are debtors, bill receivables and marketable
securities. Inventories are considered to be less liquid. Inventories normally require some
time for realizing into cash, their value also has a tendency to fluctuate. The thumb rule of 1:1
quick ratio is considered to be ideal and represents a satisfactory financial position. NALCO
has always maintained the ratio way above 1:1 as clearly indicated in the graph. The
reduction in ratio from 3.33 in 2014-15 to 1.70 in 2016-17 is mostly because of reduction in
cash and bank balance resulted from high dividend payment and buy back of shares. It has
slightly increased from 1.70 in 2016-17 to 1.81 in 2017-18.
Formula:
(Rs in crores)
Particulars 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Cash and bank balance(A) 3504.38 4048.29 4627.98 4933.53 2287.23 2768.95
Short-term Investments(B) 1329.02 1244.00 950.00 66.00 1221.13 592.96
Total current liabilities(C) 3211.93 3242.75 1967.04 2209.24 2651.93 2440.93
Cash ratio (A+B)/C 1.50 1.63 2.84 2.26 1.32 1.38
CASH RATIO
3 2.84
2.5 2.26
PERCENTAGE
2
1.63
1.5
1.5 1.32 1.38
0.5
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-13
Analysis: Since cash is the most liquid asset, a financial analyst may examine cash ratio and
its equivalent to current liabilities. Though the cash ratio of NALCO is varying in all the
years but then also it able to meet its financial requirements. A cash ratio of more than 1 is
always a healthy sign for the company as it will be able to meet all its current liabilities in
time along with helping in other capital investments also. However, higher cash ration may
indicate idle cash / bank balance which could have utilized elsewhere to earn more return.
Overall, NALCO have a strong cash reserves and it has maintained it throughout the 6 years.
(iv) Net Working Capital Ratio:-
(Rs in crores)
Particulars 2012-23 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Total current assets(A) 7075.81 7426.20 7712.18 7182.02 5655.79 5613.90
Total current liabilities(B) 3211.93 3242.75 1967.04 2209.24 2651.93 2440.93
Total assets(C) 16326.95 16548.5 16177.6 16518.9 14501.6 14613.80
1 7 9 5
Net working capital(A-B)/C 0.24 0.25 0.36 0.30 0.21 0.22
0.24
0.25
0.21 0.22
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-14
Analysis: The difference between current assets and current is called net working capital or
net current assets. The company with larger net working capital has the greater ability to meet
its current obligations. Net working capital, however, measures the firm’s potential reservoir
of funds. It can be related to net assets (or, capital employed). Seeing the graph for last 6
years, it is observed that NALCO has always maintained the ratio more than 20% with
highest of 36% in 2014-15. A healthy net working capital ratio indicates sound solvency and
liquidity position of NALCO.
8% 7%
6%
6%5% 5%
4%
2%
0%
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-15
Analysis: Here the figure no. 15show, the return on net worth also seems to be around 6-
10%, which is also low. It poses a concern for the company as it need to generate more return
from the total assets or total capital employed.
60.00%
54.35%
50.00% 43.96%
40.00% 34.11%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
YEARS
Figure no:-16
Analysis: The figure no 16 depicts the earnings per share and dividend payout ratio. The EPS
was highest in the year 2017-18 (6.94) and lowest in 2012-13. Baring 2017-18, the EPS is on
increasing trends. Nalco was declaring good amounts of dividends throughout as clearly from
the chart, but it has increased drastically in 2015-16 to 70.42% and in 2016-17 to 93.96% and
slightly decreased in 2017-18 to 82.13%. The company is now paying more dividends to the
shareholders which has ultimately reduced the cash & bank balances. However, even after
paying hefty dividends, the cash position as well as liquidity position of the company is quite
good.
CHAPTER-4
CONCLUSIONS
The year 2017-18 has been path breaking year for the journey of NALCO. The operation of
new mine i.e. South Block of Panchpatmali Bauxite Mines started w.e.f. 22.05.2017. Bauxite
transportation from the new mine started in the 4 th quarter of financial year 2017-18.
Transportation from South Block is 2 lakh MT and combined transportation of both the
Mines is 70.25 lakh MT, highest ever since inception. Total Bauxite excavation of 70.84 lakh
MT during the year is also highest ever since inception registering a growth of 3.8% over last
year. Alumina Refinery has achieved highest ever production with alumina hydrate
production of 21.06 lakh MT (100% of normative capacity) during the year is also highest
ever since inception registering a growth of 3.9% over last year. Aluminium Smelter
achieved cast metal production of 4.26 lakh MT, registering a growth of 9.8 % over previous
year. CPP achieved ‘Net Power Generation’ of 6,547 MU, registering a growth of 7.9% over
previous year.
The cash position of Nalco is at good levels and it can cater the current liabilities as well as
fund for the expansion projects in pipeline. Working capital of the company constitutes
around 20% of the total assets and with the higher capacity utilization and expansion projects
it will definitely increase from now on. Day to day working capital requirement is funded by
State Bank of India and cost of such funding is almost negligible thanks to strong credit
rating of Nalco in the industry.
The company being debt free since many years and with piling of cash & bank balances was
able to deliver high dividend payout. But, keeping in mind the expansions programs Nalco
has, it can take loan from the market to fund those projects. As a premium public sector
company with high credit rating as well as positive global scenario of aluminium industry,
Nalco will be able to raise fund at a lower rate.
The only major concern found through the study was lowering return on capital employed.
With the plant being old and increasing cost of production, the ROCE has been on lower side.
Company must take steps to maintain it at a reasonable level.
FINDINGS:-
The liquidity position is very sound. So NALCO is liquid enough to fulfill its short
term obligations.
Current ratio of NALCO is 2.29 and it shows that company has enough Current
Assets to settle its Current Liability.
Quick ratio of NALCO is 1.81 it means for each ₹1.00 of Liability Company has
₹1.81to repay.
Working capital turnover ratio is 1.76 in the year 2012-13; it shows that company has
enough money to support its sales growth.
Asset turnover ratio is 0.42 which indicate that NALCO is not making the optimum
utilization its assets towards production.
Operating profit margin is decreased as compare to its previous year, mainly due to
the bad economy condition, shortage of domestic coal, high cost ofimported coking
coal(six times cost more as compared to domestic coal)
NALCO has followed a very good investment strategy for its surplus amounts as they
are not keeping their surplus amount idle.
References:-
Smith, Keith V., (1973), State of the Art of Working Capital Management, Financial
Management, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 50-55.
Natarajan, Sundar, (1980), Working Capital Management and Finance, Economic
and Political Weekly, Vol.15 No.8, pp. M25+M27-M31.
Bhattacharyya, Hrishikes, (1987), Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Working
Capital: A Techno-Financial Approach, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 22 No.
35, pp. M101-M110.
Singh S. (1988) “Managing Working Capital by Strategic Choice”, Vikalpa, Jan-Mar,
Vol. 13, No.1, pp. 17-23.
Zaman, M., (1991), Working Capital Management Practices of Public Sector Jute
Enterprises in Bangladesh, Indian Journal of Accounting, Vol. XXII, pp. 45-60.
Peel, M., Wilson, N (1996) "Working capital and financial management practices in
the small firm sector", International Small Business Journal, Vol. 14, pp.52-68.
Hossain, Saiyed Zabid, and Akon, Md. Habibur Rahman, (1997), Financing of
Working Capital: Case Study of Bangladesh Textile Mills Corporation, Journal of
Financial Management and Analysis, Vol.10, No. 2, pp. 37-43.
Ahmed Habib, (1998), Responses in Output to Monetary Shocks and the interest Rate:
Working Capital, Economics Letters, Vol.61, pp. 351-358.
Shin, H. & Soenen, L (1998) “Efficiency of Working Capital Management and
Corporate Profitability”, Financial Practice and Education 8, pp. 37-45.
Batra G. S., and Sharma A. K., (1999), Working Capital Management in Corporate
Sector, Working Capital Management, Edited by Rao Mohana D and Pramanik
Alokkumar, Deep and Deep Publications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 51-64.
Garg Pawan Kumar, (1999), Financing and Utilisation of Working Capital in Public
Sector Industrial Enterprises, Working Capital Management, Edited by Rao Mohana
D and Pramanik Alokkumar, Deep and Deep Publications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp.
147-163.
Jain, P. K., and Yadav, Surendra S., (2001), Management of Working Capital: A
Comparative Study of India, Singapore and Thailand, Management and Change, Vol.
5, No. 2, pp. 339-355.
Howorth, Carole, and Westhead, Paul, (2003), The Focus of Working Capital
Management in UK Small Firms, Management Accounting Research, Vol.14, pp. 94-
111.
Meszek, Wieslaw, and Polewski, Marcin, (2006), Certain Aspects of Working Capital
in a Construction Company, Technological and Economic Development of Economy,
Vol. 12, No.3, pp. 222-226.
Ganesan Vedavinayagam, (2007), An Analysis of Working Capital Management
Efficiency in Telecommunication Equipment Industry, Rivier Academic Journal, Vol.
3, No. 2, pp. 1-10.
Dinesh, M., (2008), Working Capital Management: Challenges and Strategies, The
Accounting World, ICFAI University Press, April 2008, pp. 37-40.
Dr.Khatik S. K. and Jain Rashmi, (2009), Working Capital Analysis of Public State
Undertaking (A Case Study of Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board, Indian
Journal of Finance, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 31-38.
Narender, V., Menon, S. and Shwetha, V. (2009), “Factor determining working
capital management in cement industry” South Asian Journal of Management, Vol.
15, No.4, pp 65-75.
Ramudu P Janaki (2009) Working capital structure and liquidity analysis: An
empirical research of Indian Commerce vehicles industry, Journal of Accounting and
Finance, Oct, Vol.24, No.1, pp44-59.
Bardia and Kastiya (2010): Liquidity Management and Control: A comparative Study
of Torrent Pharma and Cipla, The icfai Journal of Accounting Research and Audit
Practices, Vol. IX, No. 3, pp 81-91.
Chawala Prakash, Harkawat Sandhya and Khairnar Ilas (2010), “ working capital
management and profitability- case of Indian petrochemicals company – RIL, HPCL,
GAIL.
Negi, P., Sankpal, S., Chakraborty, A. and Mathur, G. (2010): Working Capital
Management and Firm‘s Performance- A Study of Indian Manufacturing Companies,
Abhigyan,, pp 37- 44.
Agarwal, A. (2011): How to Manage Working Capital: An Empirical Study of Maruti
Suzuki India Limited, Journal of Accounting and Finance, Apr-Sept, Vol.25, No.2, pp
85-92.
Jain, P.K., Singh, S. and Kapoor, S. (2011): Working Capital Management of
Reliance Industries Limited- A Case Study, Journal of Accounting and Finance, Apr-
Sept, Vol.25, No.2, pp 3-16.
Rahman Mohammad M., (2011), Working Capital Management and Profitability: A
study on Textiles Industry, ASA University Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 115-132.
Dr Panigrahi Ashok Kumar, (2012), Impact of Working Capital Management on
Profitability- A Case Study of ACC Ltd, Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 3, No. 4,
pp. 210-218.
Kushalappa S., and Kunder Sharmila, (2012), Working Capital Management in
Manufacturing Industry: A Study With Reference to Selected Manufacturing
Industries in India, International Journal of Research in Computer Application and
Management, Vol. 2, No. 12, pp. 101-105.
Turan M. S., Bamal Sucheta, Vashist Babita and Turan Nidhi, (2013), “Relationship
between Working Capital Management and Profitability: A Comparison of Chemical
and Pharmaceutical Industries.” Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol.27, No. 1,
pp.59-69.
Kaur Harsh V., and Singh Sukhdev, (2013), Managing Efficiency and Profitability
Through Working Capital: An Empirical Analysis of BSE 200 Companies, Asian
Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 197-207.
Akoto Richard K., Vitor Dadson A. and Angmor Peter L., (2013), Working Capital
Management and Profitability: Evidence from Ghanaian Listed Manufacturing Firms,
Journal of Economics and International Finance, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 373-379.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:-