Results interpretation Draft: The data we gathered suggests that there is no statistically significant trend

in visitation frequency with respect to nectar volume in Epilobium Flowers (Insert Scientific name). This
data was collected by manipulating nectar volume in Epilobium Flowers (Insert Scientific name) either
by adding 10.0 microliters of a manmade nectar equivalent, made of table sugar and water, or siphoning
as much nectar as possible from flowers.

Fig 1: Effect of Nectar volume reduction and addition vs control (no treatment), on visitation frequency
in Epilobium flowers (Insert Scientific name). “A” represents added nectar volume, “N” represents
control or no treatment, “R” represents reduced nectar volume. Bars represent proportion of flowers
with pollen grains after aprox. 1.5 hours after treatment. (N=32 flowers/treatment with a single
mislabeled flower from “Natural” group as “Added” group.)

Fig 1: Effect of Nectar volume reduction and addition vs control (no treatment), on visitation
frequency in Epilobium flowers (Insert Scientific name). “A” represents added nectar volume,
“N” represents control or no treatment, “R” represents reduced nectar volume. Bars represent
proportion of flowers with pollen grains after approx. 90 minutes after treatment. (N=32
flowers/treatment with a single mislabeled flower from “Natural” group as “Added” group.)

Mention herbivory what it means

Fig 2: Effect of nectar volume reduction, addition, and control (no treatment) on frequency of visitation
by Carpenter Bees (Insert Scientific name) in Epilobium flowers (Insert Scientific name). “A” Represents
addition of nectar, “N” represents control/ no treatment, “R” represents reduction of nectar. Bars
represent proportion of flowers with carpenter bee slits after 1.5 hours of treatment. (N=32
flowers/treatment with a single mislabeled flower from “Natural” group as “Added” group.)
Fig 3: Effects of Nectar volume reduction, addition, and control (no treatment) on frequency of visitation
in Epilobium Flowers (Insert Scientific name) separated by bush. “A” represents added nectar volume,
“N” represents control or no treatment, “R” represents reduced nectar volume. Bars represent
proportion of flowers with pollen grains after aprox. 1.5 hours after treatment. (N=8 flowers/treatment
with a single mislabeled flower from “Natural” group as “Added” group in bush 2.)
Fig 4: Effect of nectar volume reduction, addition, and control (no treatment) on frequency of visitation
by Carpenter Bees (Insert Scientific name) in Epilobium flowers (Insert Scientific name) separated by
bush. “A” Represents addition of nectar, “N” represents control/ no treatment, “R” represents reduction
of nectar. Bars represent proportion of flowers with carpenter bee slits after 1.5 hours of treatment.
(N=8 flowers/treatment with a single mislabeled flower from “Natural” group as “Added” group in bush
2.)