Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Received: 21 October 2019 

|  Revised: 22 December 2019 


|  Accepted: 12 January 2020

DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12617

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Adverse birth outcomes and the risk of dental caries at age


3 years

Fernanda Cunha Soares1   | Göran Dahllöf1,2,3   | Anders Hjern4   |


Annika Julihn1,2,5

1
Division of Orthodontics and Pediatric
Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine,
Abstract
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Background: Since birth outcome is associated with maternal and newborn health,
2
Center for Pediatric Oral Health Research, it can be a predictor of the future health of the child.
Stockholm, Sweden
Aim: To investigate the association between adverse birth outcomes and dental
3
Center for Oral Health Services and
caries.
Research, Mid-Norway, TKMidt,
Trondheim, Norway Design: The present registry-based cohort study included all children born in 2000-
4
Clinical Epidemiology, Department of 2003, residing in Stockholm County, Sweden and who received a dental examination
Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Centre at the age of 3 years (n = 74 748). National registries supplied data on socioeconomic
for Health Equity Studies, Stockholm,
Sweden conditions, maternal health, maternal health behavior, and birth outcomes. Forward
5
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, stepwise binary logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of caries
Eastman Institute, Public Dental Service, experience in the 3-year-olds.
Stockholm, Sweden
Results: Of the subjects, 6.0% had caries experience (decayed, extracted, and filled
Correspondence teeth [deft] ≥ 1), 5.6% were born preterm (<37 weeks); 2.2% were born small (SGA)
Fernanda Cunha Soares, Division of and 3.7% large (LGA) for gestational age. Of the studied adverse birth outcomes,
Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry,
Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska
only SGA was significantly associated with caries experience at 3 years of age, and
Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. only for mothers who had refrained from smoking during pregnancy.
Email: fercsoares@gmail.com Conclusions: SGA is associated with caries experience in 3-year-old children; how-
ever, this relationship occurs only in mothers who did not smoke during pregnancy.

KEYWORDS
child dentistry, oral health, risk indicator, small for gestational age

1  |   IN T RO D U C T ION preterm birth and low birth weight due to intrauterine growth
retardation.4 In Sweden, low birth weight occurs in 2.5% of
From a life course perspective, birth outcome is particularly newborns, 6% are born preterm, and ~2.5% are born small
relevant as an indicator of maternal and newborn health; birth for gestational age (SGA). These levels have remained un-
outcome represents both reproductive outcomes of the mother changed over the past decade.4
and predictors of well-being of the child.1-3 Infants with ad- Viral infections, as well as various maternal diseases such
verse birth outcomes are vulnerable to serious medical prob- as diabetes, conditions like preeclampsia, and maternal life-
lems. The most common causes of neonatal morbidity are style factors such as smoking and stress affect fetus growth,

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
work is properly cited.
© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry published by BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;00:1–6.  |


wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ipd     1
|
2       SOARES et al.

and thus newborn birth weight.5-7 Children born preterm are


more often SGA than those born full-term.8 SGA is asso- Why this paper is important for paediatric
ciated with increased risks of metabolic and cardiovascular dentists
complications as well as suboptimal cognitive development
later in life.9 Children born very preterm run a higher risk • There is a stable incidence of adverse birth out-
of developing chronic lung disease,10 cerebral palsy, and im- comes such as low birth weight, preterm birth, and
paired vision4 and hearing.11 In addition, children with high small for gestational age.
birth weight (≥4000  g) have been reported to have higher • In this large cohort, small for gestational age was
risks of being overweight during adolescence,12 and later in associated with caries experience at 3  years of
life, of developing obesity,13,14 cancer,15 and diabetes.16 age, but only in mothers who had refrained from
An adverse birth outcome may also affect the oral health smoking during pregnancy.
of the preschool child.17,18 Preterm birth has been associated • The results suggest that adverse birth outcomes
with enamel defects in the dentition,19 with molar incisor should be explored as part of a comprehensive
hypomineralization, and with other developmental defects history, since this information can contribute to
in first molars.20,21 These types of developmental defects caries risk assessment of the child.
in enamel may increase susceptibility to dental caries.22,23
Although the association of dental caries with adverse birth
outcomes such as preterm birth, low and high birth weight, the probe under slight pressure. Proximal manifest caries was
and SGA has previously been studied, the results were in- diagnosed on bite-wing radiographs and defined as a lesion
conclusive.24-27 Julihn et al28 show that high birth weight clearly extending into the dentin.30 Only when indicated were
(>4500  g) is associated with higher caries risk in teenag- children radiographically examined.
ers, most likely due to an increased risk of obesity and other This study analyzed these adverse birth outcomes: SGA,
chronic disorders. large for gestational age (LGA), microcephaly, the Apgar
In light of these conflicting results concerning the associ- score, gestational age, weight at birth, and resuscitation. We
ation between adverse birth outcomes and dental caries, we retrieved birth outcomes from the Medical Birth Register
designed the present registry-based study. We hypothesized (MBR) at the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.
that adverse birth outcomes would be significantly associated SGA and LGA were based on the intrauterine growth curve
with caries experience in 3-year-old children. and calculated using the cut-offs of weight <10th percentile
(SGA) and >90th percentile (LGA). Weight at birth was clas-
sified as low (<2500  g), normal (≥2500 and ≤4000  g), or
2  |  M AT E R IA L S A N D ME T HODS macrosomic (>4000 g). The head circumference was catego-
rized into tertiles, considering microcephaly children in the
In the present registry-based cohort study, data were obtained smallest tertile.
from the Public Health Care Administration in Stockholm We grouped the 5-min Apgar score into ≤8 or >8 and
and registries at the National Board of Health and Welfare gestational weeks into <37 weeks or ≥37 weeks. From the
and Statistics Sweden (SCB). The complete methodology MBR, we also retrieved data on maternal smoking habits
was previously published.29 This study included all children during early pregnancy (yes or no), maternal obesity, and
residing in Stockholm County, Sweden, who were born in maternal age at delivery: <25, 25-34, or ≥35  years. Body
2000-2003 and had a dental examination at 3 years of age at mass index (BMI) of the mother was calculated and grouped
a Public Dental Service clinic; with a private practitioner; or into <30 and ≥30. The Swedish National Tax Board supplied
at the Department of Dental Medicine, Division of Pediatric information on disposable family income in 2003; we cate-
Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet. The Regional Ethics Board gorized income as ≤20% (the lowest quintile) and >20% (all
in Stockholm and the Swedish Data Inspection Board, a na- other quintiles).
tional agency that serves as an institutional review board for
studies using database linkage, approved the protocol for this
study (Daybook no. 2010/1563-31/1). 2.1  |  Statistical analysis
Data on manifest caries lesions and on extracted and filled
teeth were collected from clinical and radiographic examina- We used STATA (Version 14.0; StataCorp LP) to manage and
tion records. The decayed, extracted, and filled primary teeth statistically analyze all data. Differences between categori-
(deft) index measured the severity of the caries experience in cal variables were assessed using the chi-square test. Forward
children aged 3 years. Manifest caries was defined as caries stepwise binary logistic regression was done to determine pre-
on smooth surfaces at the lowest level that can be verified as a dictors of caries experience in the 3-year-olds. The dependent
cavity and detectable by probing or, in fissures, by a catch of variable was dichotomized into caries free (deft = 0) and caries
SOARES et al.   
   3
|
experience (deft ≥ 1) at 3 years of age. All variables with a P- 3  |  RESULTS
value lower than 0.05 in the chi-square test were entered in the
regression models as independent variables. Odds ratios (OR) The study sample of 3-year-olds comprising 74 748 children
with a 95% CI and all Ps < 0.05 were considered significant, had a slightly higher proportion of boys (51.2%). Mean birth
based on two-tailed tests. We tested two models to verify the weight was 3539  ±  581  g, and mean gestational age was
association between adverse birth outcomes and caries expe- 39.4 ± 1.9 weeks. In the study sample, 5.8% of the children
rience. In addition, the analyses were stratified into maternal had untreated caries and 0.2%, dental restorations.
smoking and no maternal smoking. At birth, 5.6% were preterm (<37 weeks); 2.2%, SGA; and
3.7%, LGA. Prevalence of microcephaly was 1.2%, and 0.6%
had been resuscitated. A 5-minute Apgar score of <8 was re-
T A B L E 1   Prevalence of adverse birth outcomes among all ported for 2.1%, and low birth weight, for 4.0% (Table 1).
Stockholm County 3-year-olds born 2000-2003 (n = 74 748) Table 2 presents a univariate analysis of the association be-
Birth outcomes Category n % tween adverse birth outcomes and caries experience (deft ≥ 1)
at 3 years. SGA was the only outcome associated with caries
SGA No 70 421 97.8
experience (OR, 1.49; 95% CI  =  1.24-1.78). A multivariate
Yes 1553 2.2
logistic regression model adjusting for gender, family income,
LGA No 69 294 96.3
maternal age at delivery, and maternal obesity found SGA to be
Yes 2680 3.7 significantly associated with caries experience at 3 years of age.
Apgar 5 ≥8 72 407 97.9 The second model adjusted for all of the first-model factors and
<8 1529 2.1 added maternal smoking, which was found to attenuate the OR
Gestational age (wk) ≥37 70 458 94.4 of the association of SGA with caries experience by approxi-
<37 4154 5.6 mately 50%, rendering this estimate non-significant (P = .102).
Weight at birth (g) Low 2986 4.0 To explain the relationship between maternal smoking,
SGA, and caries experience at 3 years of age, we stratified
Normal 56 828 79.7
the analyses by maternal smoking and no maternal smoking
Macrosomic 14 499 20.3
during pregnancy. There was no association between SGA
Resuscitation No 74 294 99.4
and caries experience at 3 years of age when evaluating ma-
Yes 454 0.6 ternal smoking during pregnancy; however, in analyses of
Abbreviations: LGA, large for gestational age; SGA, small for gestational age. non-smoking mothers only, we observed that children who

T A B L E 2   Adverse birth outcomes and


deft ≥ 0 deft ≥ 1
the potential risk of caries experience at age
3 years Variable Category n % n % P
SGA No 66 317 94 4104 6 <.001
Yes 1422 91 131 9
LGA No 65 215 94 4079 6 .887
Yes 2524 94 156 6
Head circumference, Lowest 26 623 94 1686 6 .199
tertile Medium 32 516 94 2033 6
Highest 9565 95 554 4
Apgar 5 ≥8 68 169 94 4238 6 .788
<8 1442 94 87 6
Gestational age, ≥37 66 334 94 4124 6 .557
weeks <37 3920 94 234 6
Weight at birth, g Low 2791 94 195 6 .209
Normal 53 499 94 3329 6
Macrosomic 13 673 94 826 6
Resuscitation No 69 949 94 4345 6 .191
Yes 434 96 20 4
Abbreviations: SGA, small for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age; deft, decayed, extracted, and
filled teeth.
|
4       SOARES et al.

were small for their gestational age were 1.3 times (OR, 1.3;

.343
95% CI = 1.01-1.71) more likely to have caries experience

P
compared with those who were not (Table 3).

Adjusted I

(0.77-2.12)
(CI 95%)
4  |   D IS C U SS ION

1.28
OR

Notes: Adjusted I: maternal age, family income, gender, foreign-born mother, maternal obesity. Adjusted II: maternal age, family income, gender, foreign-born mother, maternal obesity, maternal smoking.
1
This study found a significant association between SGA and

T A B L E 3   Crude and adjusted logistic regression analysis models exploring the association between small for gestational age (SGA) and caries experience at age 3 years

.235
Maternal smoking

P
caries experience in 3-year-old children; however, the as-
sociation between SGA and caries experience at the age of

(0.85-1.94)
(CI 95%)
three was only significant if the mother had refrained from

Crude
smoking during pregnancy.

1.28
OR
The reported prevalence of adverse birth outcomes in this

1
study are similar to in other population-based studies. In a

.044
registry-based study of singleton birth in women with autism,

P
Sundelin et al (2018) reported that among controls, the prev-

Adjusted I

(1.01-1.71)
alence of preterm birth was 4.7%; of SGA, 9.5%; of LGA,

(CI 95%)
9.9%; and of Apgar 5 < 7, 1.3%.31 The corresponding figures

1.31
OR
in this study are 5.6% for preterm birth, 2.2% for SGA, and

1
3.7% for LGA.

No maternal smoking

<.001
This study found registry reports of caries experience in
6.0% of the study sample among 3-year-old children. In 2006,

P
the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare reported the national

(1.19-1.83)
caries experience in 3-year-olds to be 5%, less than we found.32

(CI 95%)
Crude
One consideration is that our cohort lived in Stockholm County,

1.48
OR
where the capital is situated. In Sweden, dental health in metro-

1
politan areas is somewhat poorer than elsewhere.32

.116
The association between various adverse birth out-
P
comes and dental caries has not been extensively studied,
Adjusted II

and most of the studies have had few participants. Despite

(0.95-1.53)
(CI 95%)

an epidemiological-sized cohort, the present registry-based


study was also unable to show a significant association 1.21
OR

between adverse birth outcomes and caries experience in


3-year-old children, except for the variable SGA in moth-
.012
P

ers who had refrained from smoking during pregnancy.


The mechanism proposed in the literature is that develop-
Adjusted I

(1.07-1.69)
(CI 95%)

mental defects of enamel increase susceptibility to dental


caries.23,33,34 Several studies have failed to find a higher
1.34
OR

prevalence of dental caries in children born preterm or


1

with low birth weight and have been unable to establish an


<.001

association between developmental defects of enamel and


P

dental caries.35-37
This study found an association between SGA and caries
(1.24-1.79)
(CI 95%)

experience at 3 years of age, but this association occurred


Crude
Total

only in mothers who did not smoke during pregnancy.


1.49
OR

When we only analyzed mothers who smoked during preg-


nancy, there was no association between SGA and caries
Birth outcome (SGA)

experience, probably because smoking during pregnancy


is a known risk factor of SGA.38 Cigarette smoking during
pregnancy is the single most important risk factor for SGA,
Not SGA

and the relationship between SGA and smoking is dose-de-


pendent.39 Nicotine, the active ingredient in tobacco, has
SGA

been found to have a 15% higher concentration in the


SOARES et al.   
   5
|
placenta than the maternal blood. Nicotine causes uterine AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTION
vasoconstriction by inducing maternal catecholamine re- FC Soares contributed to data acquisition, analysis, and in-
lease.40 Furthermore, maternal smoking increases carboxy- terpretation; she also drafted and critically revised the manu-
hemoglobin levels of the umbilical arteries, which results script. G. Dahllöf and A. Hjern contributed to design, data
in fetal hypoxia.41 analysis, and interpretation; they also drafted and critically
Apart from an association with enamel hypoplasia, low revised the manuscript. A. Julihn, contributed to conception,
Apgar scores have been found to be associated with compro- design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; she also
mised immunity and impaired resistance to infection, both of drafted and critically revised the manuscript. All authors
which may increase susceptibility to dental caries.42 In our gave their final approval of the text and agree to be account-
study, however, a low Apgar score was not associated with able for all aspects of the work.
caries experience.
An important strength of this study is that adverse birth ORCID
outcome data could be sourced from national registries of high Fernanda Cunha Soares  https://orcid.
quality. In contrast, most previous studies collected information org/0000-0001-6465-3164
on birth outcomes via questionnaires to the parents. In partic- Göran Dahllöf  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8536-5292
ular, questions regarding perinatal health are difficult to verify Anders Hjern  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-2058
without access to medical records. The sample size we used Annika Julihn  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3052-6017
was large and made possible by the public health care admin-
istration in Stockholm; this reduced the possibility of selection R E F E R E NC E S
bias and increased generalizability of the results. 1. Rich-Edwards JW, Buka SL, Brennan RT, Earls F. Diverging asso-
The limitations were the dental examination performed by ciations of maternal age with low birthweight for black and white
Public Dental Service dentists, who were not calibrated for mothers. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(1):83-90.
2. Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y. A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease
this study; however, the large size of the study lowered the
Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2004.
effect of random errors compared with smaller studies, and
3. Misra DP, Caldwell C, Young AA, Abelson S. Do fathers matter?
continuing to increase the size of the study by adding data Paternal contributions to birth outcomes and racial disparities. Am
from other Swedish counties would have reduced such errors J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(2):99-100.
even more.43 Our study involved a cohort of 74,748 children; 4. Hjern A. Children's health: Health in Sweden: The National Public
thus, the risk of random error is minor. No information on Health Report 2012. Chapter 2. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(9
dietary or oral hygiene habits could be retrieved, because Suppl):23-41.
Swedish national registries do not collect this information. 5. Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodolog-
ical assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ.
Since data on oral hygiene and other factors related to oral
1987;65(5):663-737.
health in general were not collected, the results of this study
6. Cnattingius S, Haglund B. Decreasing smoking prevalence during
should be interpreted with caution. pregnancy in Sweden: the effect on small-for-gestational-age
births. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(3):410-413.
7. Borders AEB, Grobman WA, Amsden LB, Holl JL. Chronic stress
5  |   CO NC LU S ION and low birth weight neonates in a low-income population of
women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):331-338.
This study found an association between small for gestational 8. Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Bharatha A, Montanera WJ, Park AL.
Association Between MRI Exposure During Pregnancy and Fetal
age and caries experience in 3-year-old children; however,
and Childhood Outcomes. JAMA. 2016;316(9):952-961.
the association was only significant in mothers who refrained 9. Saenger P, Czernichow P, Hughes I, Reiter EO. Small for gestational
from smoking during pregnancy. The results suggest that ad- age: short stature and beyond. Endocr Rev. 2007;28(2):219-251.
verse birth outcomes should be explored as part of a com- 10. Greenough A. Long-term pulmonary outcome in the preterm in-
prehensive history, since this information can contribute to fant. Neonatology. 2008;93(4):324-327.
caries risk assessment of the child. 11. Jiang ZD, Brosi DM, Wilkinson AR. Hearing impairment

in preterm very low birthweight babies detected at term
by brainstem auditory evoked responses. Acta Paediatr.
2001;90(12):1411-1415.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
12. Rugholm S, Baker JL, Olsen LW, Schack-Nielsen L, Bua J,
This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Patent Sorensen TIA. Stability of the association between birth weight
Revenue Research Fund. and childhood overweight during the development of the obesity
epidemic. Obes Res. 2005;13(12):2187-2194.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST 13. Wang T-N, Tseng M-H, Wilson BN, Hu F-C. Functional perfor-
The authors declare no conflict of interest concerning author- mance of children with developmental coordination disorder at
ship or publication of this article. home and at school. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(10):817-825.
|
6       SOARES et al.

14. Zhao G, Ford ES, Li C, Tsai J, Dhingra S. Balluz LS. Waist circum- 30. Koch G. Effect of sodium fluoride in dentifrice and mouthwash on
ference, abdominal obesity, and depression among overweight and incidence of dental caries in schoolchildren. Odontologisk Revy.
obese U.S. adults: national health and nutrition examination survey 1967;18(Suppl. 12):1-125.
2005–2006. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:2005-2006. 31. Sundelin HE, Stephansson O, Hultman CM, Ludvigsson JF.
15. Risnes KR, Vatten LJ, Baker JL, et al. Birthweight and mortality in Pregnancy outcomes in women with autism: a nationwide popula-
adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. tion-based cohort study. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:1817-1826.
2011;40(3):647-661. 32. Landsting H. sjukvårdsnämndens förvaltning. S läns. Tandhälsans
16. Harder T, Rodekamp E, Schellong K, Dudenhausen JW, Plagemann utveckling bland barn och ungdomar i Stockholms län.
A. Birth weight and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-anal- TANDHÄLSORAPPORT.2008; 2009.
ysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(8):849-857. 33. Targino A, Rosenblatt A, Oliveira A, Chaves A, Santos V. The re-
17. Seow WK. Effects of preterm birth on oral growth and develop- lationship of enamel defects and caries: A cohort study. Oral Dis.
ment. Aust Dent J. 1997;42(2):85-91. 2011;17(4):420-426.
18. Paulsson L, Bondemark L, Soderfeldt B. A systematic review of 34. Caufield PW, Li Y, Bromage TG. Hypoplasia-associated se-
the consequences of premature birth on palatal morphology, dental vere early childhood caries – a proposed definition. J Dent Res.
occlusion, tooth-crown dimensions, and tooth maturity and erup- 2012;91(6):544-550.
tion. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(2):269-279. 35. Takaoka LAMV, Goulart AL, Kopelman BI, Weiler RME. Enamel
19. Cruvinel VRN, Gravina DBL, Azevedo TDPL, de Rezende CS, defects in the complete primary dentition of children born at term
Bezerra ACB, de Toledo OA. Prevalence of enamel defects and and preterm. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33(2):171-176.
associated risk factors in both dentitions in preterm and full term 36. Prokocimer T, Amir E, Blumer S, Peretz B. Birth-weight, preg-
born children. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(3):310-317. nancy term, pre-natal and natal complications related to child's
20. Brogardh-Roth S, Matsson L, Klingberg G. Molar-incisor hy- dental anomalies. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(4):371-376.
pomineralization and oral hygiene in 10- to-12-yr-old Swedish 37. Wagner Y. Developmental defects of enamel in primary teeth
children born preterm. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(1):33-39. - findings of a regional German birth cohort study. BMC Oral
21. Arrow P. Risk factors in the occurrence of enamel defects of the Health. 2017;17(1):10.
first permanent molars among schoolchildren in Western Australia. 38. Cardenas VM, Cen R, Clemens MM, et al. Use of electronic nic-
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(5):405-415. otine delivery systems (ENDS) by pregnant women I: Risk of
22. Seow WK. Developmental defects of enamel and dentine: chal- small-for-gestational-age birth. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17(May):1-12.
lenges for basic science research and clinical management. Aust 39. Cnattingius S. The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy:
Dent J. 2014;59(Suppl 1):143-154. Smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy out-
23. Nelson S, Albert JM, Lombardi G, et al. Dental caries and comes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(Suppl 2):125-140.
enamel defects in very low birth weight adolescents. Caries Res. 40. Horta BL, Victora CG, Menezes AM, Barros FC. Environmental
2010;44(6):509-518. tobacco smoke and breastfeeding duration. Am J Epidemiol.
24. Lai PY, Seow WK, Tudehope DI, Rogers Y. Enamel hypoplasia 1997;146(2):128-133.
and dental caries in very-low birthweight children: a case-con- 41. Lambers DS, Clark KE. The maternal and fetal physiologic effects
trolled, longitudinal study. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19(1):42-49. of nicotine. Semin Perinatol. 1996;20(2):115-126.
25. Nelson S, Albert JM, Geng C, et al. Increased enamel hypoplasia 42. Willwerth BM, Schaub B, Tantisira KG, et al. Prenatal, perinatal,
and very low birthweight infants. J Dent Res. 2013;92(9):788-794. and heritable influences on cord blood immune responses. Ann
26. Tanaka K, Miyake Y. Low birth weight, preterm birth or Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;96(3):445-453.
small-for-gestational-age are not associated with dental caries in 43. Rothman K. Biases in study design. In: Epidemiology: An
young Japanese children. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):38. Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002:94-95.
27. Saraiva MCP, Chiga S, Bettiol H, Silva AA, Barbieri MA. Is low
birthweight associated with dental caries in permanent dentition?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(1):49-56. How to cite this article: Soares FC, Dahllöf G, Hjern
28. Julihn A, Jansson P, Regnstrand T, Modeer T. Is congenital mal- A, Julihn A. Adverse birth outcomes and the risk of
formation a risk factor for caries development in Swedish adoles- dental caries at age 3 years. Int J Paediatr Dent.
cents? Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(6):1636-1644.
2020;00:1–6. https​://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12617​
29. Brandquist E, Dahllöf G, Hjern A, Julihn A. Caesarean section
does not increase the risk of caries in Swedish children. JDR Clin
Transl Res. 2017;2(4):386-396.

You might also like