Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Monitoring of Abandoned Quarries by Remote Sensing and in Situ Surveying
Monitoring of Abandoned Quarries by Remote Sensing and in Situ Surveying
Abstract
In Italy quarrying causes relevant environmental damages and alterations to the land and the ecosystems. Despite the present
Italian legislation requiring the restoration of the sites after exploitation, most of the quarries, both the abandoned and the still
operational ones, are not restored.
The objective of this work is to indicate a monitoring methodology in order to survey the present state of the quarry sites and
their evolution in time, which are the basic data needed to implement an adequate land reclamation project.
Such methodology has been applied to several abandoned limestone quarries in the Latina province (close to Rome), charac-
terised by a typical Mediterranean vegetation, but it can be applied to any other kind of litology and vegetation.
The land monitoring has been realised both by using remote sensing techniques, supported by a Geographic Information
System of the studied area, and by in situ surveying. The in situ surveying was able to assess the capability of the remote sensing
model to describe the state of each site.
© 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Quarry sites; Land monitoring; Reclamation; Restoration; Remote surveying
0304-3800/$ – see front matter © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00228-X
214 G. Bonifazi et al. / Ecological Modelling 170 (2003) 213–218
The methodology used in this work to assess the Fig. 3. Landsat 5 TM image (4 May 1994) of the quarry A3
state of restoration of abandoned quarries is based on after processing. b4 /b5 values are equal to 0.58 for limestone rock
two different types of monitoring techniques: remote (lightest areas) and 1.43 for the surrounding undisturbed vegetation
(darkest areas). Though the quarry is abandoned since 1970, 24
sensing surveying (Aronoff, 1989; Banchini et al., years later the difference is still evident in vegetation between the
1999) and in situ monitoring, through data and soil surveyed quarry and the surrounding undisturbed woods (Quercus
samples collection. The soil samples have been anal- Ilex).
G. Bonifazi et al. / Ecological Modelling 170 (2003) 213–218 215
Table 1
Data collected in situ (sampling strip S1, quarry A3)
Sampling Soil cover Grass Number of Number of Number of trees φ foliage
plot (%) cover (%) shrubs trees higher than 0.5 m (m)
1 70 60 2 0 0 0.9
2 50 40 3 0 1 0.5
3 20 10 0 0 0 0.0
4 30 10 0 0 0 0.0
5 30 10 0 0 0 0.0
6 20 20 0 0 0 0.0
7 60 20 0 0 0 0.0
8 100 90 0 0 0 0.0
9 100 100 0 0 0 0.0
10 100 100 0 0 0 0.0
11 40 40 7 0 6 10.9
12 70 60 0 0 0 0.0
13 40 20 0 0 0 0.0
14 20 10 0 0 0 0.0
15 90 80 0 0 0 0.0
216 G. Bonifazi et al. / Ecological Modelling 170 (2003) 213–218
Table 2 Table 3
Normalisation values adopted Partial restoration indices obtained (strip S1, quarry A3)
Parameters Partial restoration Normalisation Sampling I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6
indices value plot
Soil cover I1 100% 1 0.70 0.60 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.06
Grass cover I2 100% 2 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.00 0.08 0.03
Number of shrubs I3 10 3 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Number of trees I4 2 4 0.30 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Number of trees I5 12 5 0.30 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
higher than 0.5 m 6 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
φ foliage I6 15 7 0.60 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8 1.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
aspect of the restoration process (type of vegetation, 9 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
plants size, soil condition, etc.);
11 0.40 0.40 0.70 0.00 0.50 0.73
• selection of one or more sampling strips that must 12 0.70 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
be representative of the state of restoration of the 13 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
whole quarry (Fig. 4); 14 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• creation of a comprehensive restoration index (Irq ) 15 0.90 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
able to describe the state of restoration of the whole
quarry, starting from the surveyed parameters.
The results of these elaborations are presented in
Each sampling strip is made of square plots of 5 m× Table 4. According to the Irq definition, the initial
5 m as shown in Fig. 5. state is characterised by Irq = 0 (naked rock), the
In each square plot the following parameters have final state by Irq = 1 (undisturbed vegetation).
been evaluated:
1. soil cover percentage; 3.3. Soil characterisation
2. grass cover percentage;
3. number of shrubs; Soil samples coming from the sampling square plots
4. number of trees; have been analysed in laboratory. At least two soil
5. number of trees higher than 0.5 m; samples were taken from each quarry: one sample rep-
6. diameter of the tree foliage. resentative of a plot showing a scarcely developed soil
and one sample representative of a plot showing the
Concerning the last parameter, if more than one tree most evolved soil in the quarry.
is present in a square plot, it has been considered the pH (soil reaction test) and organic matter content
sum of the diameters of all tree foliage (φ foliage). analyses have been carried out on the soil samples
The data collected for each square plot of each sam- (AA.VV., 1993).
pling strip, as shown in Table 1, have been normalised The data coming from these analyses have been
by dividing each parameters by a reference normalisa- correlated to the Ir (total restoration index) obtained
tion value (Table 2), corresponding to the final state of
restoration, as surveyed in the in situ monitoring. The
Table 4
result of this elaboration is shown in Table 3 (partial Comprehensive restoration indices (Irq ) obtained for each studied
restoration indices) for the quarry named A3 (Acqua- quarry (A3, P9, A4) and for the initial state (naked rock) and the
puzza). final state (undisturbed vegetation)
The average values of the partial restoration indices Class of restoration Irq
(Ī1 , Ī2 , Ī3 , Ī4 , Ī5 , Ī6 ) for each quarry have been used
Initial state 0.00
to calculated a comprehensive restoration index (Irq ),
Quarry A3 0.27
as follows: Quarry P9 0.42
Quarry A4 0.46
Ī12 + Ī22 + Ī32 + Ī42 + Ī52 + Ī62
Irq = Final state 1.00
6
G. Bonifazi et al. / Ecological Modelling 170 (2003) 213–218 217
Fig. 7. Correlation between Ir versus the organic matter content (%) (rhombus points) and between pH versus the organic matter content
(%) (square points). Regression curves are the best fitting the data points among the interpolation options available by MS Excel. Regression
equations and correlation coefficients are shown above each regression curve.
for the corresponding plot as follows: data points, assessed through R2 (R is the correlation
coefficient), among the ones available by MS Excel.
I12 + I22 + I32 + I42 + I52 + I62 Regression equations are shown in Figs. 6 and 7.
Ir =
6
References