Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study of AXIS Bank: Society, Stakeholder
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study of AXIS Bank: Society, Stakeholder
Mr,V,T,Vasagan,
Asst. Professor,
Department of Management
ICFAI University Nagaland
ABSTRACT
‘Success’ is the main mantra of every corporate business house. While selling goods and services to the
customers, they seek the recognition of customers and the society to earn a brand image for a company to
promote their business which yield a competitive edge. The adoption of different CSR strategies through
economic, legal, ethical and discretionary obligations helps in fulfilling their mission to achieve the established
objectives. This paper focus on the need and importance of CSR in promoting business, the strategies adopted by
Axis Bank in CSR and its impact in business. This research paper deals with an understanding about the CSR,
delving into its concepts and finding out its scope by taking the case study of AXIS Bank and identifying the sense
of responsibility towards the upliftment of common masses and protection of the environment and development of
the nation.
Introduction: „Success‟ is the main mantra of any business house. Business houses seek
recognition from external and internal stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility is a public
movement that has gained momentum over the past few decades. This movement has resulted
in business becoming more transparent and socially responsible in their actions. Business
houses have started building social criteria into their strategic decision to build their business
and expose to the world that they are socially responsible organizations. In order to get
appreciation from customers and the society, they involve in various social cost activities for
which they adopt CSR strategies and principles. The business houses speds a little percentage
of their profit for CSR implementation. The adopting of CRS promote the company‟s business
which increases profit.
According to Bowen, “CSR refers to the obligation of businessmen to pursue those
policies to make those decisions or follow those line of relations which are desirable in terms
of the objectives and values of our society.” Fredrick (1960) stated “Social Responsibility
means that businessmen should oversee the operation of an economic system that fulfills the
expectations of the people.”
Review of literature
Milton Friedman (1970) expressed that CSR is an executive perk, in the sense that
managers use CSR to advance their careers or other personal agendas. He also advocate that
“One and only one social responsibility of business (is) to increase profit so long as it stays
within the rules of the game that is to say, engages in open and free completion without
deception or fraud.” But present day businesses are expected to shoulder much more social
responsibility. The effectiveness of an organisation now days depend on its ability to develop
itself into a social organisation.
Donaldson and Davis, (1991) Another perspective, stewardship theory is based on the
idea that there is a moral imperative for managers to 'do the right thing', without regard to how
such decisions affect firms financial performance. Donaldson and Preston (1995), who
stressed the moral and ethical dimensions of CSR, as well as the business case for engaging in
such activity.
Russo and Fouts (1997) tested this theory empirically using firm-level data on
environmental and accounting profitability and found that firms with higher levels of
environmental performance had superior financial performance, which they interpreted to be
consistent with the RBV theory adopted by the World Bank Committee for Sustainable
Development (WBCSD) in 1998 .
McWilliams et al. (2002) applied the RBV framework to demonstrate how US firms
can use political strategies based on CSR to raise regulatory barriers that prevent foreign
competitors from using substitute (e.g. low labour cost) technology.
Goyder (2003) argues that “Industry in the 20th century can no longer be regarded as
private arrangement for enriching shareholders. It has become a joint enterprise in which
workers, management, consumers, the locality, Govt. and trade union officials all play a part. If
the system which we know by the name private enterprise is to continue, some way must be
found to embrace many interests whom we go to make up industry in a common purpose.”
Wood (1991) “CSR implies some sort of commitment, through corporate policies and actions.
This operational view of CSR is reflected in a firm‟s social performance, which can be
assessed by how a firm manages its societal relations, its social impact and the outcomes of its
CRS policies and actions.”
Research found that company which adopts CSR programs influence 70 per cent of all
consumers purchasing decisions, with many investors and employees also being swayed in
their choice of companies.
Need/importance of the study: To understand the concept and scope of Corporate Social
Responsibility and getting an insight in CSR practices in the light of the case study of Axis
Bank . It also aims to study whether Axis Bank practices CSR principles and how it is
practiced .
Objectives of the Study:
To understand the concept of CSR
To study the different models of CSR
To study the different strategies of CSR adopted by Axis Bank and the activities carried
towards CSR.
Research methodology
Literature review related to the topic has been collected from various secondary
sources which includes books, research papers, newspapers, magazines and website for the
purpose of the study. The report of Axis Bank 2012 -13 is main source of information to study
the case.
Corporate Social Responsibility Models
There are some models which describe the evaluation and scope of social orientation of
companies. These include Carroll‟ Model, Halal‟s Model, and Ackerman‟s Model.
1) Carroll’s Model
Archie B. Carroll has defined CSR as the complete range of duties that has to
performed by the business houses towards the society. He has proposed 3-D conceptual model
of corporate performance. According to Carroll, a firm has the following four categories of
obligations of corporate performance.
Hierarchy of Responsibilities of Business Houses
Economic: The business houses are responsible to satisfy the economic needs of the society
through the generation of surplus income after rewarding stakeholders and further expansion of
business and diversification.
Legal: The business houses carry on their business operation as per the law of the land. MNCs
which are operating cross the globe follow international laws of trade and commerce as per the
host country in which it operates.
Ethical: Ethical responsibilities are the norms which the society expect from the business
houses to follow. Unethical practices such as hording, black marketing other malpractice that
business houses should not adopt while doing business.
Discretionary: Discretionary responsibilities refers to the purely voluntary obligations that a
corporation assumes such as philanthropic contribution and training the unemployed, the
involvement in community development, social project pertaining to health and awareness of
the mass.
2. Halal’s Model
Hala‟s return on resources model recognizes the fact that the corporate social
responsibility is quite difficult task to follow and fulfill the value demanded. Business houses
can only attempt to form a workable coalitions among having diverse interest, engaged in
creating value for distribution among the members of coalition. The social issues may become
conflicting beyond a certain level of economic activity. The coordination of economic and
ethical activities is necessary so that the future of the firm and shareholders may be
safeguarded.
3. Ackerman’s Model
This model defines CSR in three different phases:
First Phase: Top Management recognizes social problem.
Second Phase: Staff specialists are appointed to look into the issues and find measures to
tackle it.
Third Phase: Implementation of the strategy derived by the specialists.
Results & discussion
Axis Bank is a private sector bank which, as on 31st March 2013, has 1,947 domestic
branches including extension counters. The Bank also has branches in Singapore, Hong Kong
and Colombo, as well as representative offices in Shanghai, Dubai and Abu Dhabi. The three
major product and services offered by the Bank are:
a. Deposits
b. Loans
c. Investments and foreign exchange.
Financial Information
The Bank has a balance sheet size of Rs.340,560.66 crores, and paid-up capital of
Rs7.95 crores as on 31st March 2013. The Bank earned a total income of Rs.33,733.68 crores
for the financial year 2012-13 and the profit after tax for the year was Rs. 5,179.43 crores. The
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives of the Bank are channeled through Axis
Bank Foundation (ABF), a Trust which gives strategic direction to the philanthropic activities
of the Bank.
Corporate Social Responsibility Policy based on the principles of National Voluntary
Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities of Business. The Policy
has been framed taking into account the expectations of diverse stakeholders, recognizing the
needs of society and the environment. CSR Policy has been approved by the Board and signed
by the MD & CEO. CSR Committee was formed to oversee the implementation of the Policy.
Principle 1 - Governance
It has been the endeavor of the Bank to attain corporate governance standards of the
highest level. The Bank has put in place various Codes of Conduct and covers the aspects of
ethics, bribery and corruption. The Code guides employees to discharge their duties with
integrity, honesty, devotion and diligence and to not act in a manner that is likely to tarnish the
image of the Bank. The Bank has put in place grievance redressal mechanisms to ensure that
customer and employee concerns are addressed promptly and fairly.
Principle 2 – Sustainability of Products and Services
The Bank has recently adopted an “Environment & Social Safeguard Policy” (ESSP),
for carrying out environmental and social due diligence, formulated in compliance with the
International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards. The Bank offers products and
services that serve the under-privileged and vulnerable groups. The ESSP sets guardrails for
environmental and social considerations while appraising and financing projects which may
help prevent or mitigate any adverse impact/risk to the environment or people. The Bank has
negotiated a Line of Credit of USD 70 million from IFC to facilitate the funding of projects in
renewable energy, clean technology and other energy-efficiency projects.
Table No.-1
Table No.-6
References
Ackerman, Robert and Raymond Bauer (1976) Corporate Social Responsiveness: The
Modern Dilemma, VA: Reston.
Archie B.Carrol, (1991), „The pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the
moral management of organizational stakeholder from Business Horizons, The Foundation for
the school of Business at Indian University. http://www.cba.ua.edu/-
aturner/MGT341%20Reading/Pyramid.pdf [6]
Bowen, H.R, (1953),„Social Responsibilities of the Businessman‟, Harper & Row, New York.
Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston (1995). "The stakeholder theory of the corporation:
Concepts, evidence, and implications." Academy of Management Review Vol 20 No.1: pp.65-
91.
Donaldson Lex, Davis James H.(1991),"Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO
Governance and Shareholder Returns", Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, The
University of New South Wales.
Frederick, W.C,(1960), „The growing concern over business responsibilities.” California
Management Review, Vol. 2, pp. 54-61.
Halal, W.E, (2000), „Corporate Community: A theory of the firm uniting profitability &
responsibility, strategy & leadership, Vol.28, No. 2, pp. 10 – 16.
Mark Goyder,(2003) „Redefining CRS: From the Rhetoric of Accountability to the Reality of
Earning, Trust Company, London.
McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D. D. and Cory, K. (2002). „Raising rivals‟ costs through
political strategy: an extension of the resource-based theory‟. Journal of Management Studies,
39, 707–23.
Milton Friedman,(1970), “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,”
New York Times. Magazine, New York
Russo, M.V and Fouts, P.A, (1997), “A Resource Based Perspective on Corporate
Environmental Performance and Profitability”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 40, No.
3, pp. 534-559.
Srivastava Amit Kumar, Negi Gayatri, Mishra Vipul, Pandey Shraddha,(
2012),"Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study Of TATA Group"IOSR Journal of
Business and Management (IOSRJBM), Vol. 3, No. 5, pp 17-27
Wood, D.J, (1991), „Towards improving corporate social performance‟, World Business
Council for Sustainable Development, Business Horizons, Vol. 34, No. 4. Pp. 66-73