Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) and Cadastral Land Proceedings
Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) and Cadastral Land Proceedings
> The Law allows indigenous people to obtain recognition of their right of ownership over
ancestral lands and ancestral domains by virtue of a native title.
> Constitutional/ legal basis: SECTION 5, ARTICLE XII of the 1987 Constitution
> Landmark case: Cruz v. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, G.R. No.
135385, December 6, 2000 :
Facts: Petitioners Isagani Cruz and Cesar Europa filed a suit for prohibition and
mandamus as citizens and taxpayers, assailing the constitutionality of certain provisions of
Republic Act No. 8371, otherwise known as the Indigenous People’s Rights Act of 1997 (IPRA)
and its implementing rules and regulations (IRR). The petitioners assail certain provisions of the
IPRA and its IRR on the ground that these amount to an unlawful deprivation of the State’s
ownership over lands of the public domain as well as minerals and other natural resources
therein, in violation of the regalian doctrine embodied in Section 2, Article XII of the
Constitution.
Ruling: As the votes were equally divided (7 to 7) and the necessary majority was not
obtained, the case was redeliberated upon. However, after redeliberation, the voting remained the
same. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 56, Section 7 of the Rules of Court, the petition was
dismissed, and the questioned law was deemed upheld as valid.
Separate Opinion: Justice Puno stressed that ancestral lands and ancestral domains are not
parts of the public domain. Domains and lands held under the native title are, therefore,
indisputably presumed to have never been public lands and are private.
Concept of Native Title in the IPRA was taken from the 1909 case of CARINO v.
Insular Government
Justice Katipunan:
It is readily apparent from the constitutional records that the framers of the
Constitution didn’t intend Congress to decide whether ancestral domains shall be public or
private property. Rather, they acknowledged that ancestral domains shall be treated as private
property, and that customary laws shall merely determine whether such private ownership is by
the entire indigenous cultural community, or by individuals, families, or clans within the
community.
Ancestral Land- It refers to land occupied, possessed and utilized by individuals, families
and clans who are members of the ICCs/IPs since time immemorial, by themselves or
through their predecessors-in-interest, under claims of individual or traditional group
ownership, continuously, to the present
-except when interrupted by war, force majeure or displacement by force,
deceit, stealth, or as a consequence of government projects and other voluntary
dealings entered into by government and private individuals/corporations,
including, but not limited to, residential lots, rice terraces or paddies, private
forests, swidden farms and tree lots.
Native Title- It refers to pre-conquest rights to lands and domains which, as far back as
memory reaches, have been held under a claim of private ownership by ICCs/IPs, have
never been public lands and are thus indisputably presumed to have been held that way
since before the Spanish Conquest.
MODE OF ACQUISITION:
“SEC. 11. Recognition of Ancestral Domain Rights. — The rights of ICCs/IPs to their
ancestral domains by virtue of Native Title shall be recognized and respected. Formal
recognition, when solicited by ICCs/IPs concerned, shall be embodied in a Certificate of
Ancestral Domain Title (CADT), which shall recognize the title of the concerned ICCs/IPs over
the territories identified and delineated.
Sworn Statement of the elders as to the scope of territories as to determine the traditional
territories
Census of all community members shall be undertaken by the Ancestral Domains Office
(ADO) upon filing of the application by the ICCs
Claims shall include testimony of the elders of the community under oath in concept of
owners
A copy of the each document, translated, shall be posted for 15 days in prominent places,
local, provincial and reginal offices of NCIP
Published in a newspaper of general circulation (once a week for two consecutive weeks
in order for claimants to file opposition within 15 days of publication
On conflicting claims, ADO shall ask the contending parties to form a resolution without
prejudice
Determined and officially delineated ancestral domain shall be issued a Certificate of
Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) in the name of the community concerned.
(b) by Torrens title under the Public Land Act and the Land Registration Act (now Property Registration
Decree) with respect to ancestral lands only
“SEC. 12. Option to Secure Certificate of Title Under Commonwealth Act 141, as
amended, or the Land Registration Act 496. –– Individual members of cultural communities,
with respect to their individually-owned ancestral lands who, by themselves or through their
predecessors-in-interest, have been in continuous possession and occupation of the same in
the concept of owner since time immemorial…
preceding the approval of this Act and uncontested by the members of the same ICCs/IPs
shall have the option to secure title to their ancestral lands under the provisions of
Commonwealth Act 141, as amended, or the Land Registration Act 496 (now Property
Registration Decree).
The option granted under this section shall be exercised within twenty (20) years from the
approval of this Act.”
An individual or recognized head of a family or clan may file such application in his
behalf or in behalf of his family or clan, respectively.
If the NCIP finds such claim meritorious, it shall issue a certificate of ancestral land,
declaring and certifying the claim of each individual or corporate (family or clan)
claimant over ancestral lands.
The ADO may, upon written request from the ICCs/IPs, review existing claims which
have been fraudulently acquired by any person or community. Any claim found to be
fraudulently acquired by, and issued to, any person or community may be cancelled by
the NCIP after due notice and hearing of all parties concerned.
RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS
O
v
u
h
liti
D
w
t
b
N
/
s
IC
p
o
P
d
n
r
a
e
H
L
fF
g
m
c
y
T
A NCIP shall hear and decide after proper notice to parties, ancestral
domains as delineated in the survey plan
NCIP shall hear and decide according to customary process,
between and/or among ICCs/IPs regarding the traditional boundaries of
their respective ancestral domains
o
e
c
ffi
O
C
N
Pf
I
p
i
(
d
e
n t
e
d
n
e
h
t
n
P
e
g
a
)
y
c
d
i
s
r t
n
s
t
e
c
n
A l
a
r
Functions
a
m
o
D
n
i
m
o
C
l
a
s
n
ti
N
i
s
n
o
i
ancestral lands/domains.
D
A
(
)
O of the ICCs/IPs as provided in Chapter III of the
IPRA
-For this purpose, said individually-owned ancestral lands, which are agricultural in character and
actually used for agricultural, residential, pasture, and tree farming purposes, including those with a
slope of eighteen percent (18%) or more, are hereby classified as alienable and disposable agricultural
lands.
-The option granted under this section shall be exercised within twenty (20) years from the approval of
this Act.”
a. Nature and purpose of cadastral proceedings- Under the cadastral system, pursuant to initiative
on the part of the government, titles for all the land within a stated area are adjudicated whether or not
the people living within the area desire to have titles issued. The purpose, is to serve the public interest
by requiring that the titles to any unregistered lands “be settled and adjudicated.
4. Filing of answer
Third and last action - devolves upon the Land Registration Authority
g. Cadastral answer may not be thrown out upon a mere motion of adverse claimants
j. New titles may be issued for private lands within the cadastral survey.