Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ms. Humaira Erum: "Assignment" "Business Research Methods"
Ms. Humaira Erum: "Assignment" "Business Research Methods"
Rimsha (LCM-3535)
What is Questionnaire?
E.g.
Advantages of Questionnaire:
Disadvantages:
Dishonest answers
Unanswered questions
Differences in understanding and interpretation
Hard to convey feelings and emotions
Some questions are difficult to analyze
Accessibility issues
Characteristics of a Questionnaire:
Uniformity
Exploratory
Question Sequence
Uniformity:
E.g.
The retail store evaluation questionnaire template contains questions for evaluating retail store
experiences. Questions relate to purchase value, range of options for product selections, and
quality of merchandise. These questions are uniform for all customers.
Exploratory:
E.g.
Question Sequence:
E.g.
1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25... This sequence has a difference of 3 between each number.
Types of Questionnaires:
e.g.
An interviewer
Advantages:
In expensive
No biasness
Can ask complex, detailed questions
Can reach many people
Wide geographical coverage
Providing thoughtful answers
Ability to ask sensitive questions
Better control
Anonymity
Clarity
Disadvantages:
Mail Questionnaire:
E.g.
Census
Advantages:
Sensitive Questions
Respondent conveniences & anonymity
No interviewer bias
Longer surveys
Wide geographical regions
Token gifts can be enclosed to seek compliance
Can be administered electronically, if desired
Easy to analyze
Less intrusive
Flexibility to complete
Disadvantage:
Electronic Questionnaires:
E.g.
Online surveys
Advantages:
Easy to administer
Can reach out globally
Very inexpensive
Fast delivery
Cost-effective
Time-efficient
More accurate
Convenience
Increased Response Rate
Respondents can answer at their convenience, as with the mail questionnaire
Disadvantages:
Survey Fraud
Limited Sampling and Respondent Availability
Possible Cooperation Problems
No Interviewer
Computer literacy is essential
Respondents must have access to the facility
Respondent must be willing to complete the survey
Lack of quality
Poorly chosen distribution channels
Difficulty reaching certain types of participants
Phone Questionnaires:
E.g.
Less expensive
Faster
Can reach wider geographical range
Anonymity
Convenience
Timeliness
Opportunity for Explanations
High Accessibility
Good Quality Control
Quick Data Processing and Handling
Disadvantages:
Time-Constrained Interviews
Hard-to-Reach Respondents
Unseen Product
Call Screening or Hang-Ups
Quality Measures
Trained Interviewers Required
Non-verbal cues cannot be read
Interviewers have to be kept short
Obsolete numbers could be contacted
Expensive
Questionnaire Design
(6) Sampling
Sound questionnaire design principles should focus on three areas. The first relates to the
wording of the questions. The second refers to the planning of issues with regard to how the
variables will be categorized, scaled, and coded after receipt of the responses. The third pertains
to the general appearance of the questionnaire. All three are important issues in questionnaire
design because they can minimize bias in research. These issues are discussed below. The
important aspects are schematically depicted in Figure.
Principles of wording
Open‐ended questions
An open-ended question is a question that cannot be answered with a "yes" or "no" response, or
with a static response. Open-ended questions are phrased as a statement which requires a
response. The response can be compared to information that is already known to the questioner.
A Closed Question
For instance, instead of asking the respondent to state any five aspects of the job that she finds
interesting and challenging, the researcher might list 10 or 15 aspects that might seem interesting
or challenging in jobs and ask the respondents to rank the first five among these in the order of
their preference. All items in a questionnaire using a nominal, ordinal, Liker, or ratio scale are
considered closed.
Double-barreled questions
This may result in inaccuracies in the attitudes being measured for the question, as the
respondent can answer only one of the two questions, and cannot indicate which one is
being answered.
An example of a double-barreled question would be the following: "do you think that
students should have more classes about history and culture?" This question asks about
two different issues: "do you think that students should have more classes about history"
and "do you think that students should have more classes about culture?" Combining both
questions into one makes it unclear what exactly is being measured, and as each question
may elicit a different response if asked separately there is an increased likelihood of
confusing the respondents. In other words, while some respondents would answer "yes"
to both and some "no" to both, some would like to answer both "yes and no".
Ambiguous questions
Ambiguous question is a question which has more than one meaning and the intended
answer is vague.
For example, consider the question “Did Sara see the girl with the telescope?”.
This question does not indicate whether the girl was holding the telescope or Sara was
holding the telescope.
Recall-dependent questions
Some questions might require respondents to recall experiences from the past that are
hazy in their memory.
Answers to such questions might have bias. For instance, if an employee who has had 30
years’ service in the organization is asked to state when he first started working in a
particular department and for how long, he may not be able to give the correct answers
and may be way off in his responses.
A better source for obtaining that information would be the personnel records.
Leading questions
Loaded questions
Social desirability
Social desirability bias intervenes in the last stage of the response process when the
response is communicated to the researcher.
In this step, a more or less deliberate editing of the response shifts the answer in the
direction the respondent feels is more socially acceptable.
Length of questions
Finally, simple, short questions are preferable to long ones. As a rule of thumb, a question or a
statement in the questionnaire should not exceed 20 words, or exceed one full line in print.
4. Sequencing of questions
Principles of measurement
There some principles of measurement to be followed to ensure that the data collected are
appropriate to test our hypotheses.
These refer to the scales and scaling techniques used in measuring concepts, as well as
the assessment of reliability and validity of the measures used.
Appropriate scales have to be used depending on the type of data that need to be
obtained. The different scaling mechanisms that help us to anchor our scales
appropriately should be properly used.
Wherever possible, the interval and ratio scales should be used in preference to nominal
or ordinal scales. Once data are obtained, the “goodness of data” should be assessed
through tests of validity and reliability.
Validity establishes how well a technique, instrument, or process measures a particular
concept, and reliability indicates how stably and consistently the instrument taps the
variable. Finally, the data have to be obtained in a manner that makes for easy
categorization and coding, both of which are discussed later.
Not only is it important to address issues of wording and measurement in questionnaire design,
but it is also necessary to pay attention to how the questionnaire looks. An attractive and neat
questionnaire with appropriate introduction, instructions, and well‐arrayed set of questions and
response alternatives will make it easier for the respondents to answer them. A good
introduction, well‐organized instructions, and neat alignment of the questions are all important.
These elements are briefly discussed with example.
Organizing the questions logically and neatly in appropriate sections and providing instructions
on how to complete the items in each section will help the respondents to answer them without
difficulty. Questions should also be neatly aligned in a way that allows the respondent to
complete the task of reading and answering the questionnaire by expending the least time and
effort and without straining the eyes. A specimen of the portion of a questionnaire incorporating
the above points follows
A good introduction
A proper introduction that clearly discloses the identity of the researcher and conveys the
purpose of the survey is absolutely necessary. It is also essential to establish some rapport with
the respondents and motivate them to respond to the
questions in the questionnaire wholeheartedly and
enthusiastically. Assurance of confidentiality of the
information provided by them will allow for less biased
answers. The introduction section should end on a courteous
note, thanking the respondent for taking the time to respond
to the survey. The following is an example of an appropriate
introduction.
Personal data
Demographic or personal data could be organized as in the example that follows. Note the
ordinal scaling of the age variable.
Although demographic information can be sought either at the beginning or at the end of the
questionnaire, information of a very private and
personal nature such as income, state of health, and so
on, if considered at all necessary for the survey, should
be asked at the end of the questionnaire, rather than the
beginning. Also, such questions should be justified by
explaining how this information might contribute to
knowledge and problem solving, so that respondents
do not perceive them to be of an intrusive or prying
nature (see example below). Postponing such questions
to the end will help reduce respondent bias if the
individual is vexed by the personal nature of the question.
The questionnaire could include an open‐ended question at the end, allowing respondents to
comment on any aspect they choose. It should end with an expression of sincere thanks to
respondents. The last part of the questionnaire could look as follows.
1. Comprehensible
2. Clear
It sounds obvious, but questions need to be clear and unambiguous. Using vague buzz words,
unfamiliar terms or everyday language can blur your results. Even though respondents may think
they understand what you mean, everyone will have something different in mind, when
answering your question. Sometimes being clear runs contrary to being comprehensible,
especially if you try to be overly precise. Being clear
should never lead to these extremely long and awkward
questions that nobody will read thoroughly, especially
when completing the questionnaire on a mobile device.
Always keep the respondent in mind.
3. Neutral
4. Operationalize
Very often, you will want to find out about attitudes and behaviours that can’t be evaluated
directly. Try to operationalize these concepts and translate them into clear and tangible
indicators. Instead of asking directly whether someone is “lifestyle oriented”, rather ask for
specific products or activities, the respondent may have had contact with during the last weeks.
Not only will it be easier for the respondent to find an answer but also lead to much more
accurate results.