Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Movs) : Division of Misamis Occidental Oroquieta City
(Movs) : Division of Misamis Occidental Oroquieta City
Means of Verification
(MOVs)
Division of Misamis Occidental
Oroquieta City
June 19, 2018
Accountability Management
& Continuous Of
Improvement Resources
budget allocation
development plan
Level of practice
innovation
research partnership
assessment PPAs linkages
Teaching strategies
Learning action cell
Instructional materials
Basic Steps in
Assessment Process
Step4: Assessment proper
Step 5: Conduct process validation
Step 6: Discussion of Documents and Process
Evidence
Documentary- analysis
Discussion
Observation
Documentary- analysis
R A C C S criteria
c u
c r
u r
r e
a n
c c
y y
Criteria Description
Relevance Appropriate to the indicator being
assesses
Document or artifact is a tool or a
product of a practice expressed in the
indicator
Accuracy Evidence must be correct
(i.e lesson plan: both content must be
correct)
Currency Present
Existing or actual
Consistency Verifiable and generates same results
from the most of the sources
Sufficiency Adequate or enough
C Descripti SBM Principle Document/ Rating
rit on Artifact
er
ia
Appropri 0 1 2 3
ate to the
No The DP The DP The DP
indicator In place is a guided is is
School evide
being Development by the evolved enahnce
Improveme nce school’s
assesses Plan(e.g. SIP) through d with the
R developed nt PLan VMG is
develope
the communit
collaboratively shared y
e d through
leadershi performin
by the the
le p of the g the
(SIP
stakeholderrs leadershi
p of the
school leadershi
v Docume of the school school & and the p roles
nt or and communit and the
a the
n
artifact is community
a tool or a
) participati
on of
some
y
stakehold
ers
school
providing
technical
c product of invited support
e a practice communi
expresse ty
stakehold
d in the ers
indicator
Cri
ter Description SBM Document/ Rating
ia Principle Artifact
correct 0 1 2 3
No The The The
In place is a eviden DP DP is DP is
Development School enahnc
ce guided evolved
Plan(e.g. SIP) Improvement by the through ed with
A (i.e LP, developed PLan school’s the
VMG is shared
the
commu
c then both collaboratively develop leaders nity
content and by the ed
hip of perform
c
(SIP
procedure stakeholderrs through ing the
the
the
u must be of the school leaders
school leaders
and the hip
r correct) and hip of
a
community
) the
school
& the
commu
nity
stakeho
roles
and the
school
c participa lders providin
g
Y tion of
some technic
invited al
commu support
nity
stakehol
ders
C Descripti SBM Principle Document/ Rating
rit on Artifact
er
ia
present 0 1 2 3
r
stakeholderrs
of the school (SIP) through
the
leaders
the
school
ing the
leaders
and hip
e hip of and the
roles
community the commu
n school nity and the
stakeho school
c & the
participa lders providin
y tion of g
some technic
invited al
commu support
nity
stakehol
ders
C Dcescript SBM Principle Document/ Rating
rit ion Artifact
er
ia
verifiabl 0 1 2 3
e The
No The The
In place is a DP is
School eviden DP DP is
Development guided evolved enahnc
Improvement ce
Plan(e.g. SIP) ed with
C developed PLan
by the through
school’s the the
VMG is commu
o Generat collaboratively shared
develop leaders nity
es the by the ed
n hip of perform
s
same
results
stakeholderrs
of the school (SIP) through
the
leaders
the
school
ing the
leaders
from most and hip
i hip of and the
roles
of the community the commu
s sources school nity and the
stakeho school
t & the
participa lders providin
e tion of g
some technic
n invited al
commu support
c nity
y stakehol
ders
Cri
ter Description SBM Document/ Rating
ia Principle Artifact
Adequate 0 1 2 3
or enough The
No The DP The
In place is a guided DP is
School eviden DP is
Development by the evolved enahnc
Improvement ce school’s
Plan(e.g. ed with
S SIP) Plan VMG is
develop
through
the the
Self- developed shared commu
u ed
leaders nity
directed collaborativel through
f hip of perform
(SIP,
learning y by the the
leadersh the ing the
f stakeholders ip of the school leaders
of the school hip
i school and the
c
and
community
AIP) & the
participa
tion of
commu
nity
stakeho
roles
and the
school
i some lders providin
e invited
commun
g
technic
n ity al
stakehol support
c ders
Y
O-observations (process evidence)
cooperative learning
Interactive learning
problem solving
decision making
Learner-centered
D- discussion
friendly and non-confrontational
conversation:
1. explain 2. verify 3. clarify
4. augment the evidence/s
Invite school community member/s
who were engaged in the collection and
presentation of evidence
Arrives at a consensus on the level of
practice
Synthesized documentary & process evidence
Basic Steps in
Assessment Process
Step4: Assessment proper
Step 5: conduct process validation
Step 6: Discussion of Documents and process
evidence