From: Kevin Sanders

To: Ivan Sikora

Subject: RE: [Indico] Abstract Submission confirmation (#15)
Date: 05 November 2019 13:46:01
Sensitivity: Confidential

No problem at all J
 
The relative impact of journal titles is something of a misnomer, particularly in the age of article-
level discovery. Indeed, URSEC will be discussing our institutional position in relation to the San
Francisco Declaration of Research Assessment.
 
The Metrics Toolkit can help to identify a responsible metric for helping your assessments.
 
In terms of turn around, open access titles tend to expedite the publication process. However, as
the University does not have funds to cover an APC, you would need to ensure that any such
open access title does not charge publication fees.
 
Many thanks,
 
Kevin
 
 
 
From: Ivan Sikora
Sent: 05 November 2019 13:36
To: Kevin Sanders <Kevin.Sanders@uwl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [Indico] Abstract Submission confirmation (#15)
Sensitivity: Confidential
 
Kevin,

Thank for your email.

It is very informative having in mind your experience.

Would you be able to give us some guidance how to assess impact of potential journals
and their turn around time for papers submitted ;)?

Ivan

Get Outlook for Android

 

From: Kevin Sanders <Kevin.Sanders@uwl.ac.uk>

Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 12:26:26 PM
To: Ivan Sikora <Ivan.Sikora@uwl.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: [Indico] Abstract Submission confirmation (#15)
 
Hi Ivan,

Each journal will have slight variations in their policy, and in turn this is likely to vary by
discipline. However developing ideas from conferences into papers is not uncommon, in my
experience.

Do you have a journal in mind? As the editor is likely to make a judgement call, It is the sort of
thing that it might be worth contacting the editor about in advance of submitting a paper to a
journal.

Many thanks,

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Ivan Sikora
Sent: 02 November 2019 13:52
To: Kevin Sanders <Kevin.Sanders@uwl.ac.uk>
Subject: FW: [Indico] Abstract Submission confirmation (#15)
Sensitivity: Confidential

Dear Kevin,

I hope that this email finds you well.

I have been coauthoring a paper with my students for a few months now.

Not knowing to me one of the coauthors have submitted this paper to a conference (as shown
below).

I wonder now would that prevent us from submitting a paper or the version of the same to a peer-
reviewed journal? If that is possible, would there be guidance on how different this submission
has to be compared to the version submitted (and not yet accepted) to a conference?

Finally in case the similarity has to be substantial would you know whether it would be possible
to retrieve the conference submission to get more formal recognition through the peer-reviewed
journal publication?

I look forward to your answer, please.

With kind regards,

Ivan

Ivan Sikora
020 8231 2317
WK.01.003.
“What the superior man seeks is in himself; what the small man seeks is in others.”  - Confucius

-----Original Message-----
From: noreply-events@isae.fr [mailto:noreply-events@isae.fr]
Sent: 02 November 2019 13:13
To: Ivan Sikora <Ivan.Sikora@uwl.ac.uk>;
Subject: [Indico] Abstract Submission confirmation (#15)

...,

We've received your abstract "Human Factors Approaches and Models in LOC-I Accident
Analysis and Prevention: Flight Crew Resource Management Techniques as a Risk Mitigation
Tool" to which we have assigned id #15.

Kind regards,
The organizers of ICCAS 2020

--
Indico :: Call for Abstracts
https://events.isae-supaero.fr/event/2/