Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • HS-Stewardship - Right Is Always Right - Facilitator Card

    Uploaded by

    Vikas Gupta
    17 views1 page
    This case study discusses an incident during combat where an enemy combatant who killed a U.S. soldier was discovered barely alive. The NCO asks the company commander what to do, and is told to leave the enemy to die. The case study promotes discussion around army values of honorable service and stewardship in this situation, and the impact on trust within the unit. Participants are asked questions about who is responsible for the unit climate, if commanders and soldiers served honorably, and the consequences of treating or not treating the wounded enemy.

    Original Description:

    Case Study

    Original Title

    HS-Stewardship_Right is Always Right_Facilitator Card

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This case study discusses an incident during combat where an enemy combatant who killed a U.S. soldier was discovered barely alive. The NCO asks the company commander what to do, and is told to leave the enemy to die. The case study promotes discussion around army values of honorable service and stewardship in this situation, and the impact on trust within the unit. Participants are asked questions about who is responsible for the unit climate, if commanders and soldiers served honorably, and the consequences of treating or not treating the wounded enemy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    17 views1 page

    HS-Stewardship - Right Is Always Right - Facilitator Card

    Uploaded by

    Vikas Gupta
    This case study discusses an incident during combat where an enemy combatant who killed a U.S. soldier was discovered barely alive. The NCO asks the company commander what to do, and is told to leave the enemy to die. The case study promotes discussion around army values of honorable service and stewardship in this situation, and the impact on trust within the unit. Participants are asked questions about who is responsible for the unit climate, if commanders and soldiers served honorably, and the consequences of treating or not treating the wounded enemy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Honorable Service & Stewardship: “Right is Always Right” Written Case Study

    Facilitator: This two-part case study promotes discussion Part 1: Situation


    about Honorable Service and Stewardship. Reading each • What Army Values are involved in this situation?
    part of the Case Study twice often ensures that participants Describe the behavior that shows the Value.
    are prepared to discuss the issues. Additional questions for • Describe the type of climate that exists in this unit. Who
    discussion follow the story. is responsible for that climate?
    • Describe how the situation will affect Trust relationships
    Facilitator’s Summary: During intense action, it was with the Soldiers/Leaders. With the Army.
    discovered that the enemy who killed a U.S. Soldier was still • Is the Special Force Commander serving honorably? Why
    alive, though barely. Still under heavy fire, an NCO asks the or why not?
    Company Commander what to do with that enemy • Were the other members of the unit serving honorably?
    combatant. Why or why not?
    • What would be the consequences to treating, and not
    Notes: treating this man?
    • Would it have been dishonorable to simply have allowed
    the enemy to die? Explain your answer.

    Part 2: Conclusion
    • Why didn’t the NCO want to take proper action in this
    situation?
    • Did the Special Force Commander act as a Steward? Why
    or why not? What message did he send to the unit?
    • What does it mean that the Army Profession must be
    “self-regulating”? Who performs that function in this
    scenario? How?

    You might also like