Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Listening Styles
Listening Styles
Professor Gonzalez
Interpersonal Communications
24 March 2020
Listening styles
perceive feelings, needs, wants, and just a part of how we communicate with others. By
listening you can just tell with their tone or intensity if they are upset, happy, or etc.
to understand how the other person is feeling. We can define listening as the process of
listeners’ use when they want to show they identify with the speaker (Alder et al. 197 &
214). The four types of listening styles are Relational, Analytical, Task Oriented, and
Critical. Each of these styles play important roles listening when building and
hearing are two very different terms, hearing is the process in which sound waves strike
the eardrum and cause vibrations that are transmitted to the brain. Listening occurs
when the brain reconstructs these electrochemical impulses into a representation of the
original sound and then gives them meaning. (Alder et al. 198). An example of listening
versus hearing would be hearing is when you can hear people talking in a restaurant but
are not actually listening to the words and processing them, in other words it would just
sound like background noise. Listening would be talking with someone, taking in the
There are four types of listening styles, Relational, Analytical, Task oriented and
people. My results from this were thirty-five. I think this score is pretty good because I
tend to try and relate with the person I am talking to when communicating. According to
the book, people who primarily use this style are typically extroverted, attentive and
friendly (Alder et al. 199). Although I may not be extroverted, I think of myself as friendly
and attentive.
attending to the full message before coming to judgement. People who default to this
style of listening want to hear details and analyze an issue from a variety of
perspectives. Analytical listeners can be a big help when the goal is to investigate
difficult questions, taking into account a wide range of perspectives (Alder et al. 201).
My score for this was thirty. I personally think that I tend to not quickly judge a book by
it’s cover, mainly because that’s how I was raised but here and there I notice myself
The third style of listening is Task Oriented. This type of listening is most
concerned with efficiency and accomplishing the job at hand. It’s most appropriate when
the primary focus is taking care of business; such listeners encourage others to be
organized and concise (Alder et al. 199). My score for this was Forty. This was my
highest score because I tend to get impatient with people who take forever to get the
point across.
The last style of listening is critical. This would be defined as having the desire to
evaluate messages like critical thinking. These types of people are concerned not with
just understanding messages, but with assessing their quality, focusing on accuracy
and consistency (Alder et al. 201). A con for critical listeners is they can at times
frustrate others by seeming to find faults about small details. My score for this was
nineteen. My score was so low for this one because I don’t usually tend to interrupt
Based on my data, I can conclude that my listening is pretty good, but could
always improve. My highest score came from task-oriented listening and my lowest
relationships at work or at home is to just be a more effective listener and pay closer
attention to detail. Whichever style I use, it is important to recognize that I can control
the way I listen (Alder et al. 201). I can also become a more effective listener by
my lowest score, what I plan to do to improve my listening for the future is to pay closer
tend to forget what my boss specifically wanted done or what my parents wanted me to
do. I can also use more nonverbal skills such as making eye contact, showing good
body language to show that I am being attentive and listening to what someone else
has to say. Oculesics is the study of how the eyes can communicate. Gazes and
glances are usually signals of the looker’s interest (Alder et al. 179).
Works Cited
Alder, Ronald. Interpersonal Communications. Madison Ave, New York. 2001 Accessed
February 7, 2020