Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Obama Has Lost The World
Obama Has Lost The World
After the 2010 elections, it's not exactly news that Obama has lost America. But in a less
public referendum, he also lost the world. Obama's cocktail party tour of the world's
capitals may look impressive on a map, but is irrelevant on a policy level. In less than
two years, the White House has gone from being the center of world leadership to being
irrelevant, from protecting world freedom to serving as a global party planning commit-
tee.
Even the Bush Administration's harshest critics could never have credibly claimed that
George W. Bush was irrelevant. He might have been
hated, pilloried and shouted about-- but he couldn't be
ignored. However Obama can be safely ignored. In-
vited to parties, given the chance to show off his cos-
mopolitan sophisticated by reciting one or two words in
the local lingo, read off a teleprompter, along with
some cant about the need for everyone to pull together
and make the world a better place, and then dismissed
for the rest of the evening.
The only countries who take Obama seriously, are the ones who have to. The leaders of
Great Britain, Israel and Japan-- who have tied their countries to an enduring alliance
with America based on mutual interests and values, only to discover that the latest fel-
low to sit behind the Oval Office desk no longer shares those values and couldn't give
less of a damn about American interests. It's no wonder that European leaders ignore
him as much as possible. Or that Netanyahu visited America, while Obama was abroad.
Or that Japanese politics have become dangerously unstable.
On the enemy side, the growing aggressiveness of China, North Korea, Iran, Hezbollah
and Al Qaeda can all be attributed to the global consensus that no one is at home in the
White House.And if no one is at home in the White House, then that's a perfect time to
slap the big boy around the yard. China is doing it economically, the rest are doing it
militarily. They're all on board with Obama's Post-American vision of the world. But
unlike him and most liberals, they have a clear understanding of what that means. The
America of some years back, which actually intimidated Libyan dictator Khaddafi into
giving up his nuclear program, without lifting a hand against him is long gone. So is the
Cedar Revolution. Syria and Iran are back in charge in Lebanon. And in Afghanistan, the
Taliban are laughing at our soft power outreach efforts.
Obama's soft power approach emphasizes the 'soft' and forgets the 'power'. It neglects
even Clinton era understandings about the role of America in the world, and reverts in-
stead to a Carter era sense of guilt that bleeds into hostility toward American interests
and allies. While the rest of the world puts their own interests first, they act like a cog in
some imaginary global community, turning and turning toward the distant horizon of in-
ternational brotherhood. While China, Russia and most of the world walk down their
backs and up their jellyfish spines, laughing all the way. And America's allies gird them-
selves and prepare for the worst.
From the first, this administration has curried favor with America's enemies by betraying
and humiliating its allies. But these hideous acts of
moral cowardice have not won Obama the approval of
America's enemies. Only their contempt. And a Nobel
Peace Prize from a committee of elderly left wing
Swedes, awarded not for any accomplishment, but for
the lack thereof. For being a man without a country, a
leader without a spine and a representative of America
who gives no thought for the interests of that country.
Obama has no mandate at home, and he has even less of one abroad. America's enemies
do not fear him. Only our allies do. Kim Jong Il does not sit up nights worrying what
Obama will do. Because the consensus in North Korea, Iran and the rest of the world is
that the sea will rise, the sun will set and Obama will do nothing. Except maybe write a
strongly worded letter, offset by some quiet backchannel diplomacy from his coterie of
international left wing stooges reassuring the offender that, "No, Barry really isn't mad at
you. He's just concerned. Really, really concerned."
Liberal pundits mock the rough and ready style of conservatives like Reagan, Bush or
Palin in world affairs, but what they fail to realize is that the over-educated naivete,
trendy cosmopolitanism and buzzword rich approach of a Kerry or Obama come off as
laughably pathetic on the world stage. Republicans might be hated, but they can't be ig-
nored. Democrats on the other hand are catspaws and pawns, fools who are so sure of
their cleverness and determined to embrace every culture in the way that only the gradu-
ates of Ivy League institutions can, that any Third World vendor could twirl them around
his fingers.
World leaders are rarely liked, but effective ones are respected. And effective world
leaders don't lead with appeasement, don't compromise before the other side has even
made an offer and negotiate on behalf of their country, rather than some intangible
global consensus. They understand that they represent a country, not a popularity con-
test. They don't travel abroad to be adored or be greeted with parades and gifts, but to
achieve tangible results on specific issues. To do otherwise is not to be a world leader,
but a celebrity who happens to have picked up a big title along the way.