Persistence of K103N-Containing

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

BRIEF REPORT

and effective for prevention of HIV-1 mother-to-child trans-


Persistence of K103N-Containing mission (pMTCT). However, exposure to SD NVP is associated
HIV-1 Variants after Single-Dose with selection of NVP-resistant HIV-1 variants. Using a pop-
Nevirapine for Prevention of HIV-1 ulation sequencing–based genotyping assay (ViroSeq), the por-
tion of women with NVP resistance detected 6–8 weeks after
Mother-to-Child Transmission SD NVP varied among HIV-1 subtypes (C1D1A) [3]. The most
common NVP resistance mutation detected in women with all
Tamara S. Flys,1 Deborah Donnell,2 Anthony Mwatha,2
Clemensia Nakabiito,3 Philippa Musoke,3 Francis Mmiro,4 3 subtypes was K103N. ViroSeq reliably detects the K103N
J. Brooks Jackson,1 Laura A. Guay,1 and Susan H. Eshleman1 mutation when it is present in ⭓20% of the viral population
1
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, [4]. Using a sensitive and quantitative point mutation assay
Baltimore, Maryland; 2Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research (LigAmp), the portion of women with detectable K103N
and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle,
Washington; Departments of 3Paediatrics and 4Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
(10.5% K103N) 6–8 weeks after SD NVP was 41.7% for subtype
Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda A, 55.3% for subtype D, and 69.8% for subtype C. The highest
mean levels of K103N were found in women with subtype C
(2.2% for subtype A, 5.5% for subtype D, and 11.7% for sub-
K103N-containing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–1 type C) [5]. Differences in detection of K103N in women with
variants are selected in some women who receive single-dose these 3 subtypes did not appear to reflect differences in the
(SD) nevirapine (NVP) for prevention of HIV-1 mother-in- viral loads of the samples or differences in HIV-1 sequences
fant transmission. We examined the persistence of K103N in at the binding sites of oligonucleotides used in the LigAmp
women who received SD NVP prophylaxis. K103N was de- assay [5].
tected using the LigAmp assay (assay cutoff, 0.5% K103N). K103N-containing variants can persist at low levels for years
K103N was detected at 6–8 weeks in 60 (41.7%) of 144
in the absence of antiretroviral drug exposure in patients who
women. Fading (lack of detection) of K103N was documented
are infected with resistant strains [6] and in patients who dis-
in 16 women by 2 years, 43 women by 3 years, and 55 women
continue treatment with a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase
by 4 and 5 years. Slower fading was independently associated
with HIV-1 subtype (D1A) and higher pre-NVP viral load. inhibitor (NNRTI) [7]. Long-term persistence of K103N-con-
taining variants in women after SD NVP could potentially re-
duce the efficacy of SD NVP for pMTCT in subsequent preg-
The HIV Network for Prevention Trials (HIVNET) 012 regimen
nancies or the efficacy of NNRTI-based regimens for future
of single-dose (SD) nevirapine (NVP) [1, 2] is safe, inexpensive,
treatment of their HIV-1 infection. In the HIVNET 012 trial,
1–2-year follow-up samples were available for 9 women who
Received 24 May 2006; accepted 19 October 2006; electronically published 18 January
2007. had NVP resistance mutations detected at 6–8 weeks (3 of
Potential conflicts of interest: S.H.E. is a coinventor of the LigAmp assay, and Johns Hopkins subtype A and 6 of subtype D). Using the LigAmp assay, we
University has filed a patent application with the US Patent and Trademark Office. The inventors
may receive royalty payments if the patent is awarded and licensed. All other authors report
detected low levels of K103N-containing variants in 3 of those
no potential conflicts. women 1–2 years after SD NVP, all with subtype D [8]. In this
Presented in part: XV International HIV Drug Resistance Workshop, Sitges, Spain, 13–17
report, we used the LigAmp assay to analyze the persistence of
June 2006 (abstract 45).
Financial support: HIV Network for Prevention Trials, National Institute of Allergy and K103N-containing variants in women with subtype A and D
Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and HIV-1 who were enrolled in a 5-year follow-up study of the
Human Services (DHHS) (contract N01-AI-35173 to Family Health International, contract N01-
AI-45200 to Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and subcontract NOI-AI-35173-417 to HIVNET 012 trial.
Johns Hopkins University); HIV Prevention Trials Network, NIAID, National Institutes of Child Subjects, materials, and methods. Two-hundred thirty-
Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute
of Mental Health, and Office of AIDS Research, NIH, DHHS (grants U01-AI-46745, U01-AI- two (75.8%) of 306 antiretroviral drug–naive Ugandan women
48054, U01-AI-068613); NIH, NICHD (grant R01-HD042965-01). who received SD NVP in HIVNET 012 were subsequently en-
Reprints or correspondence: Dr. Susan Eshleman, Dept. of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins
Medical Institutions, Ross Bldg. 646, 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205 (seshlem@
rolled in a follow-up study with annual study visits 2–5 years
jhmi.edu). after their original SD NVP exposure. Eighty-eight of the 232
The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2007; 195:711–5 women were excluded from analysis for the following reasons:
 2007 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
0022-1899/2007/19505-0017$15.00
(1) the receipt of SD NVP in a subsequent pregnancy during
DOI: 10.1086/511433 the follow-up period (n p 39), (2) the presence of a subtype

BRIEF REPORT • JID 2007:195 (1 March) • 711


other than A or D (3 of subtype C, 23 recombinant, and 5 of analyzed in duplicate, and the results for the percentage of
undetermined subtypes), (3) the receipt of treatment with com- K103N were averaged.
bination antiretroviral therapy during the follow-up period HIV-1 subtyping was performed previously by phylogenetic
(n p 2), (4) the lack of a 6–8-week sample available for analysis analysis of HIV-1 pol region sequences [3]. Baseline HIV-1 load
(n p 7), (5) the failure of the 6–8-week sample to amplify and CD4 cell count were measured before NVP administration
(n p 4), (6) the occurrence of the 6–8 week-study visit 1100 in the HIVNET 012 trial, as described elsewhere [1, 2]. In-
days after receiving SD NVP (n p 4 ), and (7) the presence of formed consent was obtained from all subjects for participation
an unusual K103Q polymorphism in HIV-1 reverse transcrip- in HIVNET 012 and the follow-up study. HIVNET 012 and
tase (n p 1). In the woman with the K103Q polymorphism, the follow-up study were approved by the local institutional
3%–6% K103N was detected in samples both before and up review boards in Uganda and at Johns Hopkins University
to 5 years after SD NVP exposure. Analysis of HIV-1 clones School of Medicine. Guidelines of the US Department of Health
from the pre-NVP sample confirmed that detection of K103N and Human Services and the authors’ institutions were followed
represented a false-positive test result. In contrast, analysis of in the conduct of this research.
other samples with 0.5%–1% K103N with an independent assay Results. Among 144 women in this study, 60 (41.7%) had
confirmed the presence of low levels of K103N-containing var- K103N detected at the 6–8-week visit (⭓0.5% K103N). We an-
iants [8]. alyzed persistence of K103N among those 60 women by use of
The LigAmp assay involves a mutation-specific oligonucle- samples collected 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after SD NVP adminis-
otide ligation step followed by a universal real-time polymerase tration. For each woman, after fading of K103N was docu-
chain reaction (PCR) detection step [4]. The LigAmp assay was mented (!0.5% K103N detected in a sample), samples from
performed using PCR products remaining after HIV-1 geno- subsequent study visits were not tested. Many of the 60 women
typing with ViroSeq (assay cutoff, 0.5% K103N). Samples were did not have 2-year samples because approval of the amend-

Figure 1. Analysis of K103N-containing variants in women after single-dose nevirapine administration. The present study analyzed women enrolled
in the long-term follow-up study of the HIV Network for Prevention Trials 012 cohort (see Subjects, materials, and methods). Sixty of those women
had K103N detected at the 6–8-week visit by use of the LigAmp assay (assay cutoff, 0.5% K103N) and 84 did not. Follow-up samples were analyzed
with the LigAmp assay. For each subsequent study visit, samples were tested from women who either had no sample available from the prior visit
or who had K103N detected at the prior visit. For each woman, after fading of K103N was documented (!0.5% K103N), samples from subsequent
study visits were not analyzed. Data are the no. of women tested at each study visit who had positive results (K103N was detected at ⭓0.5% with
the LigAmp assay), negative results (K103N was not detected with the LigAmp assay), or no sample available for testing.

712 • JID 2007:195 (1 March) • BRIEF REPORT


Table 1. Turnbull estimates of the percentage of women with !0.5% K103N in plasma
samples among all women (n p 144) and among the women with K103N detected 6–8
weeks after single-dose (SD) nevirapine (NVP; n p 60).

Group, study visit Subtype A Subtype D Total


All womena
6–8 weeks 65.9 (55.4–75.0) 46.4 (33.9–59.4) 58.3 (50.1–66.1)
2 years 96.4 (86.1–99.1) 70.2 (49.4–85.1) 87.6 (78.9–93.0)
3 years 98.7 (91.6–99.8) 81.1 (67.8–89.7) 91.9 (85.7–95.5)
4 years 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 97.6 (85.2–99.7) 99.1 (93.9–99.9)
5 years 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 97.6 (85.2–99.7) 99.1 (93.9–99.9)
Women with K103N detected
6–8 weeks after SD NVPb
2 years 89.4 (64.4–97.5) 30.1 (10.9–60.2) 63.0 (45.5–77.7)
3 years 96.3 (77.9–99.5) 65.2 (45.5–80.7) 80.7 (67.8–89.2)
4 years 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 95.6 (75.0–99.4) 97.8 (86.3–99.7)
5 years 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 95.6 (75.0–99.4) 97.8 (86.3–99.7)

NOTE. Data are estimated cumulative percentages (95% confidence intervals) of women in whom
fading was documented. Fading was defined as failure to detect K103N using the LigAmp assay, with an
assay cutoff of 0.5%. A survival analysis approach was used to estimate fading of K103N-containing variants.
Estimates of time to fading were obtained using a modified Kaplan-Meier estimator (Turnbull estimator)
with discrete time steps (visits 1–5 corresponding to the 6–8-week, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, and 5-year visits).
Women were considered right-censored at their last sample collection visit if they were still resistant at
this last visit (5 women). Women were considered interval-censored if fading was observed between visits
(55 women). Finally, women were considered left-censored if no K103N was detected at the 6–8-week
visit (84 women). In those women, the event (fading) was considered to have occurred before the obser-
vation period began. Both univariate and multivariate analysis of baseline factors associated with fading
used a Weibull survival model for time to fading of resistance. To compute P values for the difference
between point estimates at a given visit, a 2-sided Z test was used, with pointwise SEs obtained from the
Turnbull estimator. Analyses were conducted using SAS (version 9.1; SAS Institute).
a
Subtype A, n p 88; subtype D, n p 56; total, n p 144.
b
Subtype A, n p 30; subtype D, n p 30; total, n p 60.

ment for the follow-up study and their consent for the follow- not have 2-year results but did have 3-year results (interval
up study were obtained 12 years after they received SD NVP censored), standard Kaplan-Meier estimates could not be used
in HIVNET 012. The level of K103N detected at 6–8 weeks to estimate the cumulative probability of fading at each study
was similar among women with 2-year samples (median, 2.2%) visit. The Turnbull estimate (a Kaplan-Meier–type estimate
to that of those without 2-year samples (mean, 2.3%; P p modified for interval censored data) uses the intuitive as-
.44); however, there is some imbalance in subtype. Women with sumption that the distribution of missing test data at each study
subtype A compose a higher proportion of those with samples visit can be estimated from available test data from the same
at 2 years (14/20 of those who were tested at 2 years were visit. This approach provides estimates and corresponding con-
subtype A vs. 16/40 of those who were not tested; P p .055). fidence intervals (CIs) of the cumulative percentage of women
Among all 144 women, we documented undetectable K103N with undetectable K103N at each study visit (cumulative rate
in a total of 100 women by 2 years, 127 by 3 years, and 139 of fading). The estimated cumulative rates of fading for all 144
by 4 and 5 years (figure 1). The remaining women either had women at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years by use of this model were 87.6%,
K103N detected or had no sample available for testing. Figure 91.9%, 99.1%, and 99.1%, respectively (table 1). When the
1 shows the number of women tested at each study visit. Among analysis was limited to the 60 women with K103N detected at
the 60 women who had K103N detected at 6–8 weeks, we 6–8 weeks, the estimated cumulative rates of fading at 2, 3, 4,
documented undetectable K103N in 16 women by 2 years, 43 and 5 years were 63.0%, 80.7%, 97.8%, and 97.8%, respectively
by 3 years, and 55 by 4 and 5 years. Whenever K103N was (table 1). The estimated rates of fading were consistently lower
detected in samples after the 6–8-week visit, the level of K103N in subtype D than A, both among all 144 women and among
in the viral population was low. The mean percentage of K103N the subset of 60 women who had K103N detected at 6–8 weeks
among women with detectable K103N was 1.2% at 2 years (30 women with subtype A and 30 women with subtype D)
(n p 4 women; range, 0.9%–1.8%) and 0.8% at 3 years (n p (table 1). Among those 60 women, the mean number of years
9 women; range, 0.5%–1.2% K103N). to the first available follow-up sample was similar for women
A statistical model was used to estimate the cumulative rate with subtype A, compared with those with D (2.9 years for
of fading of K103N. In this study, in which many women did both subtypes; P p .94, t test).

BRIEF REPORT • JID 2007:195 (1 March) • 713


In univariate models examining predictors of fading among likely to have NVP-resistant strains detected after SD NVP
all 144 women, subtype (D1A), higher baseline viral load, and exposure. We now show that K103N-containing variants are
lower baseline CD4 cell count were significant predictors for a also more likely to persist in the years following delivery among
longer time to fading of K103N. In a multivariate model, sub- women with higher HIV-1 loads. These findings emphasize the
type (hazard ratio [HR] for D vs. A, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.33–0.77]; importance of evaluating HIV-1 disease status in pregnant HIV-
P p .0007) and baseline viral load (HR per log increase in 1–positive women and the importance of providing eligible
baseline viral load, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.48–0.83]; P p .0006) were women with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) dur-
independently associated with time to fading, but baseline CD4 ing pregnancy, if it is available.
cell count was not (HR per decrease of 100 cells, 0.97 [95% Unfortunately, HAART is still not available to pregnant
CI, 0.90–1.05]; P p .43). The time to fading was approximate- women in many countries that shoulder the greatest burden
ly twice as long for women with subtype D, compared with of the HIV-1 epidemic, because of cost, lack of needed infra-
women with subtype A, and a log increase in baseline viral structure, and other factors. Additionally, many women in re-
RNA increased time to fading by a factor of 1.57. Among the source-limited settings do not know their HIV-1 infection
subset of 60 women who had K103N-containing variants de- status and do not present for medical care until close to or at
tected at 6–8 weeks, time to fading was predicted by the level the time of delivery; in such situations, initiation of HAART
of K103N at the 6–8-week visit in a univariate model but not during pregnancy, even if available, would not be possible. Our
in a multivariate model. In a multivariate model, results for findings demonstrate fading of NVP resistance to very low levels
this subset of 60 women were similar to those obtained for all after SD NVP exposure, and recent clinical studies suggest that
144 women; only subtype and viral load predicted time to the response to NNRTI-based HAART is not compromised by
fading (HR for subtype, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.17–0.68] [P p .005]; prior SD NVP exposure if treatment initiation occurs at a time
HR for viral load, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.22–0.90] [P p .003]). distant from the exposure. These observations support contin-
Discussion. This report demonstrates that HIV-1 variants ued use of SD NVP as an important option for pMTCT in
with K103N can persist at very low levels for years in some settings where more complex regimens are not available.
women following SD NVP exposure and that HIV-1 subtype
(D1A) and higher baseline viral load are both associated with Acknowledgments
slower fading of those variants. Since we first described selection
We thank the staff in Uganda and Johns Hopkins for assistance with
of K103N-containing variants after SD NVP [9], concerns have sample processing. We also thank Clinical Trials Specialist Melissa Allen
been raised about whether persistence of NVP-resistant HIV- (Family Health International) for assistance and Lynne M. Mofenson (Na-
1 would lower the efficacy of SD NVP for pMTCT in subse- tional Institutes of Child Health and Human Development) for critical
review of the manuscript.
quent pregnancies. Two preliminary studies found no signifi-
cant difference in the efficacy of the HIVNET 012 regimen for
pMTCT with first versus second use [10, 11]. Early reports of References
NVP resistance after SD NVP also raised concerns that prior
1. Guay LA, Musoke P, Fleming T, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal single-
exposure to SD NVP would adversely affect the response of dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-
women to future treatment with NNRTI-containing regimens. to-infant transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda. HIVNET-012
Available studies suggest that NVP-resistant variants that emerge randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354:795–802.
2. Jackson JB, Musoke P, Fleming T, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal
after SD NVP exposure are unlikely to compromise subsequent single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of
treatment of women with NNRTI-containing regimens, pro- mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: 18
vided that there is sufficient time between the initial NVP ex- months follow-up of the HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet 2003;
362:859–68.
posure and treatment initiation to allow fading of NVP-resis- 3. Eshleman SH, Hoover DR, Chen S, et al. Nevirapine (NVP) resistance
tant strains [12–15]. Data in this report suggest that the rate in women with subtype C, compared to subtypes A and D, after ad-
of fading of NVP-resistant strains may vary from one geo- ministration of single dose NVP. J Infect Dis 2005; 192:30–6.
4. Church JD, Jones D, Flys T, et al. Sensitivity of the ViroSeq HIV-1
graphic region to another, depending on which subtypes are Genotyping System for detection of the K103N resistance mutation in
prevalent. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether sub- HIV-1 subtypes A, C, and D. J Mol Diagn 2006; 8:420–2.
type-based differences in the fading of NVP-resistant HIV-1 5. Flys TS, Chen S, Jones DC, et al. Quantitative analysis of HIV-1 variants
with the K103N resistance mutation after single dose nevirapine in
variants influence clinical or virologic outcome in NVP-ex-
women with HIV-1 subtypes A, C and D. J Acquir Immune Defic
posed women who are subsequently treated with NNRTIs. Syndr 2006; 42:61–3.
Many countries now offer pregnant women potent antiret- 6. Little SJ, Dawson K, Hellmann NS, Richman DD, Frost SDW. Persis-
tence of transmitted drug-resistant virus among subjects with primary
roviral regimens for pMTCT and for treatment of their own
HIV infection deferring antiretroviral therapy. Antivir Ther (Suppl)
HIV-1 infection. Women with higher HIV-1 loads are more 2003; 8:S129.
likely to transmit HIV-1 to their infants and are also more 7. Palmer S, Boltz V, Maldarelli F, et al. Selection and persistence of non-

714 • JID 2007:195 (1 March) • BRIEF REPORT


nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 in patients 12. Jourdain G, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Le Coeur S, et al. Intrapartum ex-
starting and stopping non-nucleoside therapy. AIDS 2006; 20:701–10. posure to nevirapine and subsequent maternal responses to nevirapine-
8. Flys T, Nissley DV, Claasen CW, et al. Sensitive drug resistance assays based antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:229–40.
reveal long-term persistence of HIV-1 variants with the K103N nevi- 13. Lockman S, Shapiro RL, Smeaton LM, et al. Response to antiretroviral
rapine (NVP) resistance mutation in some women and infants after therapy after a single, peripartum dose of nevirapine. N Engl J Med
single dose NVP: HIVNET 012. J Infect Dis 2005; 192:24–9. 2007; 356:135–47.
9. Jackson JB, Becker-Pergola G, Guay L, et al. Identification of the K103N 14. Coovadia H, Marais B, Abrams E, et al. Virologic responses to NNRTI
resistance mutation in Ugandan women receiving nevirapine to prevent treatment among women who took single-dose nevirapine 18 to 36
HIV-1 vertical transmission. AIDS 2000; 14:F111–5. months earlier [abstract 641]. In: Program and abstracts of the 13th
10. Eure C, Bakaki P, McConnell M, et al. Effectiveness of repeat single-
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Denver).
dose nevirapine in subsequent pregnancies among Ugandan women
Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Retrovirology and Human Health,
[abstract 125]. In: Program and abstracts of the 13th Conference on
2006:278.
Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Denver). Alexandria, VA:
Foundation for Retrovirology and Human Health, 2006:93. 15. Zijenah L, Kadzirange G, Rusakaniko S, et al. Community-based ge-
11. Martinson N, Ekouevi D, Gray G, et al. Effectiveness of single-dose neric ART following single-dose nevirapine or short-course zidovudine
nevirapine in consecutive pregnancies in Soweto and Abidjan [abstract in Zimbabwe [abstract 544]. In: Program and abstracts of the 13th
722]. In: Program and abstracts of the 13th Conference on Retroviruses Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Denver).
and Opportunistic Infections (Denver). Alexandria, VA: Foundation Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Retrovirology and Human Health,
for Retrovirology and Human Health, 2006:311. 2006:236.

BRIEF REPORT • JID 2007:195 (1 March) • 715

You might also like