Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparative Rhetorical Analysis of Amber Rose and Henry Rollins
Comparative Rhetorical Analysis of Amber Rose and Henry Rollins
Comparative Rhetorical Analysis of Amber Rose and Henry Rollins
Alexis La Rosa-Joe
Dr.Arini
2/17/20
The two motivational speakers that I chose to analyze are Henry Rollins and Amber
Rose. Henry Rollins is an activist, musician, comedian, actor, etc. What caught my attention
about Henry was the fact that he often shines a light on the gay and young community.
have similar concerns, have a history with the music industry and make a large difference in
society. However, the ways that they share their beliefs and encouragement are different.
Henry starts off the video "Letter to a Young American" by referring to the watchers as a
“Young Person”. Henry has grey hair, and it is safe to assume he isn't “young”. With that, he is
easier to listen to because of his experience based on his age. He is utilizing Ethos here. He goes
frustrating to those who are less privileged to observe more fortunate people. He steers the
audience’s focus by giving the example of an influential figure, Abraham Lincoln who had an
extremely poor upbringing. Here Henry is creating a reachable environment by employing ethos
In another similar style video titled "Henry Rollins on Gay Marriage". Henry is giving
his opinion on gay marriage. A moment of exigency for Henry was in high school. Henry
witnessed extended bullying to one of his classmates until the point of attempted suicide. Henry
believes it was a time when his anti-homophobia developed. In the video, Henry says, “I am not
convinced that, that many people really have a problem with gay marriage”. He goes on to
support this with a theory that those who claim to hate gays are just using this topic as a means of
entertainment. Henry then says, “Hating the gay, that one always performs”. He refers to “that
one” as the hate for gay people. The word performs has a negative connotation because a
person's preference should not be up for display or used for amusement. Here the
word performs implies inappropriateness and mistreatment. The word choice is bothersome and
impactful. He uses pathos to arouse the audience's sympathy for gay people and gay marriage.
He continues his video with some kind words, such as, “If two people are crazy enough to be that
in love with each other, it's a great thing, give them a break, life is really short, let them have a
La Rosa-Joe 3
little happiness. “ This description of love is touching and another great example of pathos. Later
on in the video, Henry mentions that “ That's why we have amendments to the constitution so it
has wiggle room. I think that gay marriage is already covered under the first amendment, so I
think this conversation is over.” Henry is applying logos, we can look to amendments as facts
If you visit Henry’s Instagram page, you will notice that he has a large growing number
of 176k followers. This followership that he has let us know that a lot of people look up to him
as a public figure which is an example of ethos. His Instagram page bio consists of Henry's name
and his friend Heidi’s name, they share an Instagram account and are often sharing silly posts of
one another laughing. He and Heidi also host a podcast; that information is shared in his
Instagram bio with a link. All of Henry's experiences and accomplishments really work as ethos
because he is extremely credible and has multiple responsibilities. If you watch the first video
Henry has on his page he is being recorded by a woman who asks him, “ what are you doing?”
and he responds with “ Signing books”. Henry has just recently released and written a book
called Stay fanatic Vol 1. Henry has written around 29 books, topics ranging from travel
experiences where he meets all different kinds of people to his search for interesting music
records.
Amber at her home to discuss confidence, and how exactly Amber deals with the continuous
judgment that comes with her lifestyle based on her past. Amanda is an American woman who
served time in an Italian prison for murder, which she was later acquitted. She claims the Italian
police justified her for murder by portraying her as sexually promiscuous. As Amanda enters
Ambers home, she is greeted by Amber who is smiling and gives Amanda a hug. Pathos is
La Rosa-Joe 4
applied here creating a warm and comfortable environment for the audience and Amanda. They
went on a slight tour of Ambers home where there was a poster that read, “ Reclaim the word
slut” next to a baseball hat that was studded and also read “slut”. As the two women sat, they
began to talk about women being vilified through their sexuality. Amber openly shares that she
used to be a stripper, however she does not look at this point of her life as something that was
negative. Amber says, “It was the best time of my life. “She has established ethos here, Amber
was a stripper but she is now a millionaire. As the video continues, Amber says,” It was a form
of business school for me” here she is using situational irony. The audience has to be thrown for
a loop when they hear this comparison. It is extreme, but you can believe her because of her
current status.
On Amber’s Instagram, her profile photo is her topless wearing boxing gloves and she is
covering her breasts with one hand and biting on the other. The message that the pictures send is
empowerment along with sex appeal. Her bio reads, “Empowering women & LGBTQ+
community while ending sexual and social injustice, derogatory labeling & gender inequality”. If
you continue to scroll, you will notice several posts containing supportive captions. A moment of
exigency for Amber was in 2011 when a Toronto police suggested to a group of college women
that they shouldn’t dress like sluts if they didn’t want to be sexually assaulted. Women began
taking a stand, and Amber saw a photo of a woman wearing pasties and wrote on her bare skin,
“Still not asking for it.”Amber became interested and wanted to take part in the movement. She
tweeted that she was having a Slutwalk that year, and it began trending and has had a growing
population since then. One post is a poster board being held by a participant at the
annual Slutwalk with different color handwriting that spells out “ The empowered woman is
powerful beyond measure and beautiful beyond description”; the post is gripping, pathos is
La Rosa-Joe 5
demonstrated here. On another post, there is a woman smiling and posing in front of a large
chalkboard where there are several different writings but the largest one reads “SLUT” and the
implemented again, people are often being called sluts with a negative connotation. This page is
normalizing the word with hopes to end Slut-shaming and it’s working towards that with 67k
While listening to Loveline with Amber Rose, where there are 29k followers I noticed
that each episode is hosted with Dr. Chris Donahue who practices general psychology &
specializes in individual therapy, couples & sex therapy. The audience who calls and asks for
advice can expect credibility and knowledge from not just Amber because of her experience but
also Chris. Her platform employs ethos just by the cast members. In one of her episodes, she
addresses a celebrity who quickly attacked Amber’s Slutwalk movement. Her response was “
Hey, one day someone will call your daughter a slut, hoe, whore, etc for no reason at all besides
the fact that she is beautiful, confident, possibly if she wears something sexy/god forbid gets
sexually assaulted or victim-blamed. Please educate yourself on what the movement is before
you speak so ignorantly. You’re welcome to visit Amberose.com for more info.” She has a
personal experience without shaming here and handles it well by utilizing pathos to respond to
her attacker. In another episode, she covers defining gender. She and Chris emphasize how
important it is to ask people what they want to be referred to because they had both accidentally
Both Amber and Henry speak encouraging words to a large audience and their
knowledge stems from experience. I think both speaker's approach is something you have to
have an open mind to listen to. They both say things that are a bit raw, however, they are genuine
La Rosa-Joe 6
and ultimately kind people. I would say that Henry’s approach is probably more admired because
Amber's sex appeal can be found offensive. Overall, both speakers employ a lot of pathos, ethos
and a very small amount of logos in their speaking. I feel fascinated when hearing them speak
and since discovering both speakers I have found that I do take a step back before passing
judgements on others.
La Rosa-Joe 7
Works Cited
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kF7vNVmb2fo
https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?
fr=mcafee&p=letter+to+young+american#id=1&vid=95c783d0f52e3568c71fd53d39b3fc17&act
ion=click
Rollins, Henry. “Henry Rollins & Heidi May (@Henryandheidi) Instagram photos and
videoshttp://www.instagram.com/henryandheidi/?hl=en
Rose, Amber. “Amber Rose SlutWalk (@slutwalk_la) Instagram photos and Videos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WximQA0vPwk