RIGHTS TO LIBERTY

RIGHTS TO TRAVEL BOOK

Morocco/Al Moroc/Maroco/Al Marikanos

Greater Moorish/Moroccan Empire

Moorish Society Foreign Ministry of America

Free Moslem Society – Moorish Nation - Islamism
Know Thyself and Allut
Presented by Presiding Officer, Chief Consul,

FOR MOORS - MOORISH AMERICANS

In Morocco Media – IMM
PRESENTS:
A Scott Bey Publishing – SBPub,
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
INCORPORATED - LICENSE - COPYRIGHT – TRADEMARK

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

 Recorded for the record into record the
(19 R 32; 18 R 119, DURHAM COUNTY COMMON LAW PUBLIC RECORD), Certificate Identifications, RSTEA-ART I.;
(MSFM -COI-009); (MSFM-COLI-009); (MSFM-CPY-009) (MSFM-TR-009) ÒÓÔ2019

In Morocco Media – IMM

PRESENTS:

A Scott Bey Publishing – SBPub,

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
INCORPORATED - LICENSE - COPYRIGHT – TRADEMARK
recorded for the record into record the (19 R 32; 18 R 119, DURHAM COUNTY COMMON LAW PUBLIC RECORD), Certificate
Identifications, RSTEA-ART I.;
(MSFM -COI-009); (MSFM-COLI-009); (MSFM-CPY-009) (MSFM-TR-009) ÒÓÔ2019
This is made in accord with the honoring of my family bloodline / pedigree / birth rights, unalienable rights,
vast inheritance and in exercising my natural substantive rights and religious Islamism heritage and following
The covenant of the great God-Allah, “Honor thy Father and thy Mother that thy day maybe longer
upon the earth land, which the Lord thy God Allah hath given thee!”

THIS IS MADE IN ACCORD WITH THE HONORING OF MY FAMILY

BLOODLINE / PEDIGREE / BIRTH RIGHTS, UNALIELANBLE RIGHTS,
VAST INHERITANCE AND IN EXERCISING MY NATURAL
SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS AND RELIGIOUS ISLAMISM HERITAGE AND
FOLLOWING
The covenant of the great God Allah,” Honor thy Father and thy Mother
that thy day maybe longer upon the earth land, which thy God Allah hath
given thee!”

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

 EXTRATERRITORTALITY LAW
ANCIENT MOORISH LAW
TO GOVERN OVER LAWS
ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION 1777-1781
PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP:
TREATY OF AMITY AND MOROCCO AND UNITED: STATES 1786-87
‘FREE NATIONAL’ CONSTITUTION 1787 – SUPREMACY CLAUSE VI
CIRCLE 7 HOLY KORAN DIVINELY PREPARED BY PROPHET NOBLE DREW ALL
FOR FREE MOSLEM SOVERIEGN MOORISH AMERICANS
ARTICLES 20 & 21 - MOHAMMEDAN LAW

Evidence of Proof [Exhibits 1 – 9 in order by years affirmed]:

1.Treaty of Peace and Friendship (Amity and Commerce) Between Morocco and The United
States 1786-87;

6. Amity and Commerce 1786 Articles 16, 20, & 21

16. In case of a War between the Parties, the Prisoners are not to be made Slaves, but to be exchanged
one for another, Captain for Captain, Officer for Officer and one private Man for another; and if there shall
prove a deficiency on either side, it shall be made up by the payment of one hundred Mexican Dollars for
each Person wanting; And it is agreed that all Prisoners shall be exchanged in twelve Months from the Time of
their being taken, and that this exchange may be effected by a Merchant or any other Person authorized by
either of the Parties.

1930 English Translation by Dr. C. Snouck Hurgronje, of Leiden

The sixteenth article has been well rendered in all essentials in the translation of 1786, but the words
"are not to be made slaves" are not in the original, and the "Mexican dollar" is represented in Arabic by
"royal" only.

To Note: Mexican dollar did not exist in 1786-87 therefore ‘royal’ inferred as Gold and Pursuant to the
Constitution 1787 - Section. 10. Clause 1 No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters
of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment
of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title
of Nobility.

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

20. If any of the Citizens of the United States, or any Persons under their Protection, shall have any
disputes with each other, the Consul shall decide between the Parties and whenever the Consul shall require
any Aid or Assistance from our Government to enforce his decisions it shall be immediately granted to him.

1930 English Translation by Dr. C. Snouck Hurgronje, of Leiden

The twentieth article is that if a person of our [can only mean hero the American] nation or under our
flag is guilty of misdemeanor, the Consul of his nation shall pass sentence upon him. If the Consul wants the
assistance of the officials of the Pasha of the place, it shall be granted to him.

21. If a Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or on the contrary if a Moor shall kill or
wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place and equal Justice shall be
rendered, the Consul assisting at the Tryal, and if any Delinquent shall make his escape, the Consul shall not
be answerable for him in any manner whatever.

1930 English Translation by Dr. C. Snouck Hurgronje, of Leiden

The twenty-first article is that if there has been killed a Christian out of them or the reverse [sic] or
has wounded him [sic], then he will be sentenced according to the rules of the Sacred [Mohammedan] Law,
neither more nor less, and the trial is to take place in the presence of the Consul. If the delinquent escapes
before having been sentenced, the Consul shall not be held responsible for him nor for the crime he committed.
[The redaction of Article 21 is extremely inept.]

2.Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (more) 19 How. 393; 15 L. Ed. 691; 1856 WL 8721; 1857
U.S. LEXIS 472

Dred Scott Case Decision (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that African
descent, whether free or enslave, were not citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court
also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared
that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves
were categorized as property.

3. U.S. Constitution 1787 – Article 6

(All Debts, Supremacy Clause, Oaths)

Section 1 All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution,
shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

Section 2 This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance
thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall
be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the
Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003



Section 3 The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State
Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall
be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a
Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

4. Constitution of The UNITED STATES 1787

13th Amendment with the open 20 sections
Signed into law by President of the UNITED STATES,
Abraham Lincoln on February 1, 1865 and 100-4 House vote at the state
capitol on Dec. 4, 1865, made North Carolina the next-to-last state to approve the Thirteenth
Amendment.

SECTION 12 – The traffic in Slaves with Africa is hereby forever prohibited on pain of death
and the forfeiture of all the rights and property of persons engaged therein; and the descendants
of Africans shall not be citizens.

5. Circle 7 Holy Koran, for Moorish American 1926 - Divinely Prepared by the Holy
Noble Prophet El Hajj Sharif Abdul Ali/Noble Drew Ali 1926

CH XLVII - EGYPT, THE CAPITOL EMPIRE OF THE DOMINION OF AFRICA

6. The Moabites from the land of Moab who received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to
settle and inhabit North-West Africa; they were the founders and are the true possessors of the present
Moroccan Empire. With their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren who sojourned. From the land of
Canaan seeking new homes.

9. The covenant of the great God-Allah, “Honor thy Father and thy Mother that thy day
maybe longer upon the earth land, which the Lord thy God Allah hath given thee!”

10. What your ancient forefathers were you are today without contradiction.

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

6. House Joint Resolution No. 75 - page 4367 April 17, 1933, adopted May 4, 1933

The Resolution was read by the Clerk as follows:

In the House of Representatives, April 17, 1933. Many sons and daughters of that proud and handsome race
which inspired the architecture of Northern Africa and carried into Spain the influence of its artistic
temperaments have become citizens of this Nation.

In the City of Philadelphia there exists a Moorish-American Society made up of Moors who have
found here the end of their quest for a home and of the children of those who journeyed here from the plains of
Morocco.

This Society has done much to bring about a thorough absorption by these people of those principles which
are necessary to make them good American citizens. These Moorish-Americans have since
being here missed the use of the titles and name annexations that were so familiar at home and

which are used in accordance with the doctrines of the religious faith to which they are adherents therefore be
it, Resolved That this House bringing about a speedy and thorough Americanization of these former Moors
and that in accordance with the fullest right of religious independence guaranteed every citizen we recognize
also the right of these people to use the name affixes El or Ali or Bey or any other prefix or suffix to
which they have heretofore been accustomed to use or which they may hereafter acquire the right to use.

7. Universal Declaration of United Nations Human Rights 1948

Article 15
1. Everyone has the right to a nationality.
2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his
nationality.

8. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2007

Signed by President of the UNITED STATES, Barack Obama in 2010

Article 6 – Every indigenous individual has the right to a nationality.

9. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)

“No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution
without violating his undertaking to support it.”

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

 PEOPLE’S RIGHTS ARE
UNLIENABLE-INALIENABLE
(NOT LIEN ABLE)

Moorish Society Foreign Ministry of America

Free Moslem Society – Moorish Nation - Islamism

In the Constitution of the United States, the 9th Amendment states, in its
entirety, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” The
other rights are common-law and natural rights.

Therefore the U.S. Constitution recognizes natural rights, and all laws in
the USA should be consistent with the 9th Amendment, although in
practice, the 9th is ignored and not widely understood.

JUDICAL ENGAGEMENT - [ju-di-cial en-gage-ment] (noun): The act of properly
judging, by focusing on the facts of every case, remaining impartial, and requiring the
government to justify its actions with reliable evidence.

“No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.”
(Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)

“If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and
fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.”
(Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

Right to Travel:
10. "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property
thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may
prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness."- Thompson v Smith, 154 SE 579

11. "Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another
according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free
transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the l4th Amendment
and by other provisions of the Constitution." - Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287,
293.

12. It is settled that the streets of a city belong to the people of a state and the use thereof
is an inalienable right of every citizen of the state. Whyte v. City of Sacramento, 65 Cal.
App. 534, 547, 224 Pac. 1008, 1013 (1924); Escobedo v. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles
(1950), 222 Pac. 2d 1, 5, 35 Cal.2d 870 (1950).

13. This right of the people to the use of the public streets of a city is so well established
and so universally recognized in this country, that it has become a part of the alphabet of
fundamental rights of the citizen. Swift v. City of Topeka, 23 Pac. 1075,1076, 43 Kansas
671, 674.

14. "Complete freedom of the highways is so old and well established a blessing that we
have forgotten the days of the Robber Barons and toll roads, and yet, under an act like this,
arbitrarily administered, the highways may be completely monopolized, if, through lack of
interest, the people submit, then they may look to see the most sacred of their liberties
taken from them one by one, by more or less rapid encroachment." Robertson vs.
Department of Public Works, 180 Wash 133,147.

15. Public ways, as applied to ways by land, are usually termed “highways” or “public
roads,” are such ways as every citizen has a right to use. Kripp v. Curtis, 11 P. 879; 71
Cal. 62

16. Every citizen has an inalienable right to make use of the public highways of the state;
every citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and
liberty. People v Nothaus, 363 P.2d 180, 182 (Colo.-1961).

17. Americans' "freedom to travel throughout the United States has long been recognized
as a basic right under the Constitution," according to multiple cases including Williams v
Fears, 179 US 270, 274; 21 S Ct 128; 45 L Ed 186 (1900); Twining v New Jersey, 211 US
78, 97; 29 S Ct 14; 53 L Ed 97 (1908), as listed in the case of United States v Guest,
383 US 745; 86 S Ct 1170; 16 L Ed 2d 239 (1968), a case involving criminally prosecuting

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

people for obstructing the right (obstruction is a federal crime pursuant to federal criminal law 18
USC 241).
19. Case law shows that the "liberty" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment extends
beyond freedom from bodily restraint and includes a much wider range of human activity,
including but not limited to the opportunity to make a wide range of personal decisions
concerning one's life, family, and private pursuits. See Meyer v, 262 US 390, 399; 43 SCt
625, 626; 67 L Ed 1043 (1923), and Roe v Wade, 410 US 113, 152-153; 93 S Ct 705, 726-
727; 35 L Ed 2d 147 (1973). One of these life, family, private pursuits is obviously driving.

20. In effect, as per the Supreme Court decision in the case of Crandall v Nevada, 73 US
35; 18 L Ed (1867), speed limits and other traffic control devices, being non-fact-based, are
simply an unlawful tax or impost on travel, and thus unconstitutional for the reason cited in
Crandall. (Crandall involved a tax on travelers! which is what in essence speed limits,
unscientific stop signs, etc., simply are, stripped of all the phony fraudulent politician
folderol pretending them to relate somehow to safety, not to mention that are extortion
violating the federal anti-racketeering act (RICO), 18 USC 1961 and the law against
obstructing federal rights, 18 USC 241).
Colorado Article 42-2-101 clearly states, licensing is for commercial drivers, not private
citizens..

21. "...For while a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport
his property thereon, that right does not extend to the use of the highways...as a place for
private gain. For the latter purpose, no person has a vested right to use the highways of this
state, but it is a privilege...which the (state) may grant or withhold at its discretion..." State
v. Johnson, 245 P 1073.

22. "The right to travel is part of the Liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without
due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles 357 U.S. 116, 125.
Reaffirmed in Zemel v. Rusk 33 US 1.

23. "Where activities or enjoyment, natural and often necessary to the well being of an
American citizen, such as travel, are involved, we will construe narrowly all delegated
powers that curtail or dilute them... to repeat, we deal here with a constitutional right of the
citizen..." Edwards v. California 314 US 160 (1941).

24. "Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the
highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure,
though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience.
- Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago, 169 NE 22 ("Regulated" here means stop lights,
signs, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission or unconstitutional taxation; i.e. -
licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc., requiring financial consideration,
which are more illegal taxes.)

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

25. "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property
thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may
prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness."- Thompson v Smith, 154 SE 579.

26. "The right to travel is protected by the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th
Amendment."
"Right to travel is constitutionally protected against private as well as public
encroachment."
Volunteer Medical Clinic, Inc. V. Operation Rescue, 948 F2d 218; International Org. Of
Masters, Etc. V. Andrews, 831, F2d 843; Zobel v. Williams, 457 US 55, 102 Sct. 2309.

27. "License: In the law of contracts, is a permission, accorded by a competent authority,

conferring the right to do some act which without such authorization would be illegal, or
would be a trespass or tort." Blacks Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1910).

28. "Where an individual is detained, without a warrant and without having committed a
crime (traffic infractions are not crimes), the detention is a false arrest and false
imprisonment."
Damages Awarded: Trezevant v. City of Tampa, 241 F2d. 336 (11th CIR 1984)

29. "License: In the law of contracts, is a permission, accorded by a competent authority,

conferring the right to do some act which without such authorization would be illegal, or
would be a trespass or tort." Blacks Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1910).

30. "The license means to confer on a person the right to do something which otherwise he
would not have the right to do." City of Louisville v. Sebree, 214 S.W. 2D 248; 308 Ky.
420.

31. "The object of a license is to confer a right or power which does not exist without it."
Pavne v. Massev, 196 S.W. 2D 493; 145 Tex. 273; Shuman v. City of Ft. Wayne, 127
Indiana 109; 26 NE 560, 561 (1891); 194 So 569 (1940).

32. "A license is a mere permit to do something that without it would be unlawful."
Littleton v. Buress, 82 P. 864, 866; 14 Wyo.173.

33. "A license, pure and simple, is a mere personal privilege...River Development Corp. V.
Liberty Corp., 133 A. 2d 373, 385; 45 N.J. Super. 445.

34. "A license is merely a permit or privilege to do what otherwise would be unlawful, and is
not a contract between the authority, federal, state or municipal granting it and the person

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003

to whom it is granted..."American States Water Services Co. Of Calif. V. Johnson, 88
P.2d 770, 774; 31 Cal. App.2d 606.
36. "A license when granting a privilege, may not, as the terms to its possession, impose
conditions which require the abandonment of constitutional rights." Frost Trucking Co. V.
Railroad Commission, 271 US 583, 589 (1924); Terral v. Burke Construction Company,
257 US 529, 532 (1922).

37. "It is clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business,
trade or calling; thus when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of
business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the
natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation." Wingfield v.
Fielder (1972) 29 CA3d 213.

38. "The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an
obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the regulations
prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States." W. W. CARGILL
CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452

39. "The word privilege is defined as a particular benefit, favor, or advantage, a right or
immunity not enjoyed by all, or it may be enjoyed only under special conditions." Knoll
Gold Club v. U.S., 179 Fed Supp. 377, 380.
"...those things which are considered as inalienable rights which all citizens possess cannot
be licensed since those acts are not held to be a privilege." City of Chicago v. Collins, 51
N.E. 907, 910

ScottBey Publishing - 2019#SCBY003