Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Soil Bioeng Manual
Soil Bioeng Manual
1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 8
5 DESIGN SOFTWARE............................................................................................................................. 86
5.1 Maccaferri River Analysis (MACRA 1) Software.......................................................................... 86
5.2 Maccaferri Stability Analysis of Reinforced Slopes (MACSTARS) Software............................... 88
5.3 Maccaferri Analysis of the environmental quality of a river training works (MAQUA) software . 89
7 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................... 91
TABLE OF FIGURES
TABLE OF PHOTOS
TABLE OF TABLES
TABLE OF APPENDICES
1 INTRODUCTION
This manual has been written for the benefit of engineers, landscape architects, biologists, soil
conservationists and anyone who is concerned and interested in the protection and mitigation of
ecosystems. It illustrates the compatibility of incorporating environmentally sound concepts into the
design of engineering solutions.
It must be stressed from the onset that any soil bioengineered technique adopted, must, primarily be
technically sound from an engineering aspect, and secondarily satisfy environmental requirements.
This manual not only gives a background into soil bioengineering and ecological systems and the
products and techniques which may be adopted, but also goes through the concept of greening
traditional gabion structures, and how to account for this in the engineering design.
Guidance to solutions that combine engineering practices and ecological principles is provided.
For further information, please contact your nearest African Gabions office.
PLEASE NOTE
The information in this manual reflects our best knowledge at the time of issue. This manual is
subject to changes arising from new developments and findings; the same applies to our products. It
should be viewed as a working document, which is subject to regular updates. We undertake no
liability for the results of usage of our products and information.
Soil bioengineering techniques, which have proven successful in North America and Europe, have
not, as yet, been thoroughly tested in Africa, and therefore should be used with caution.
2 SOIL BIOENGINEERING
2.1 Definitions
The method of construction using living vegetation and non-living organic matter, often in
combination with structural elements and manufactured products, is referred to by a host of
terminology as shown below.
2.1.1 Bioengineering
Bioengineering is the use of biological, mechanical and ecological concepts to control erosion while
preserving ecological value. It relies on living and non-living plants, typically in combination with
traditional construction material, to stabilise soil and to provide good wildlife and fisheries habitat in
riparian systems (University of Minnesota, 1999). In its strictest definition, it refers to a plant-only
solution.
2.1.3 Eco-engineering
Ecological engineering (Eco-engineering) entails the use of mechanical elements (or structures) in
combination with biological elements (or plants) to arrest and prevent slope failures and erosion.
Both biological and mechanical elements must function together in an integrated and complementary
manner.
Irrespective of the terminology chosen, each technique refers to the integration of sound engineering
practices with ecological principles. It is a method of construction using living vegetation and non-
living organic matter, often in combination with structural elements and manufactured products.
For the purposes of this manual, this technique will be referred to as soil bioengineering.
Soil bioengineering is often used in combination with conventional engineering, offering an enduring
alternative that increases permanence, effectiveness and aesthetic appeal.
difficult conditions and nature needs a helping hand at erosion control. In this case, inert materials
need to be brought into the solution.
Soil bioengineering brings together biological, ecological, and engineering concepts to produce living,
functioning systems. The structural components initially protect the site mechanically and develop a
stable, healthy environment for the plants to establish.
Vegetation will have a protective function in waterside applications: The stems and leaves reduce the
hydraulic loads (active role of the vegetation) while the roots improve the stability of the subsoil
against erosion (passive role of the vegetation). In some cases the vegetation plays only an aesthetic
role. (Pilarczky, 1997).
BENEFIT FEATURE
Natural plant Enhances conditions for the natural colonisation and establishment of plants from the
colonisation surrounding plant community.
Increase in soil Dries excessively wet sites through transpiration as the vegetation grows.
stability by reducing Provides for surface drainage and can positively affect the direction of seepage flow.
soil moisture
Increase soil stability
Reinforces the soil as roots develop, adding significant resistance to shallow sliding
due to plant growth and shear displacement for smaller slopes.
Soil temperature Plants provide protection from the extremes of heat and cold, which lead to a healthier
moderation environment for plant germination and growth.
Improves water The heavily vegetated banks filter and slow storm water runoff and trap sediment,
quality thereby improving water quality.
Air quality The removal of harmful airborne chemicals and dust offer air quality improvement and
improvement increased oxygen production.
Low maintenance The bioengineered structure becomes self-maintaining and self-repairing.
Noise reduction Absorption of sound waves by the soil and the vegetation.
Versatile Can be used in conjunction with conventional engineering systems.
Job creation Soil bioengineering applications are often labour intensive, due to difficult access to
sites and hand planting requirements for vegetation.
Environmental Supports indigenous plant species and wildlife habitat and speeds up ecological
benefits succession.
Positive impact on Vegetation provides:
wildlife * • Shelter and nesting sites – protection from predators and floods;
• Shade – keeping the water cooler in summer and slowing the growth of algae;
• A source of food.
Aesthetics Bioengineered structures support indigenous plant species and wildlife habitats, which
improve the aesthetic appeal of the structure.
Durable As the structure becomes filled with soil and plant roots, its durability is no longer
restricted to the life of the inert materials.
Shelter Plants find shelter from the inert materials in order for their roots to flourish.
Vandalism Vegetating the structure “removes” it from sight, assisting with the prevention of
vandalism.
Improved biological The filtering of water through the structure, the consequent siltation within the voids,
conditions and the growth of vegetation tend to improve the biological conditions thereby
restoring the natural ecosystem.
* Environment Agency, undated.
• The usefulness of soil bioengineering techniques may be limited by the following conditions:
o Lack of fertile soil or moisture to support the required plant growth;
o Soil-restrictive layers, such as igneous intrusions, may prevent required root growth;
o Banks exposed to high velocity water flow or constant inundation; and,
o Climatic constraints.
• Particularly in urban stream environments, vegetative techniques alone are often insufficient for
reversing channel instability due to constrained space and modifications in the hydrological and
sediment transport regime. Consequently a combination of hard and soft engineering is required
to restore the natural channel geometry.
• Soil bioengineering practices are most successful where the medium has sufficient fines,
nutrients, sunlight, and moisture to support plant growth.
• It is highly recommended to consult specific practitioners for specialised areas such as biological,
geotechnical and hydraulic assessment. A multidisciplinary approach allows the engineer to
conduct static and hydraulic checks, the landscape architect to take care of the environmental
impact of the river works, the botanist and the zoologist to choose grasses, trees and shrubs
suitable for the region and to indicate the need for maintaining / creating areas different in water
level in order to promote the settlement of species typical of that region.
• The design engineer must always recognise the possibility of complete failure of the vegetation
and consequent increased risk of slope instability. For this reason, vegetation would not normally
be allowed to be the prime factor governing slope stability where the consequences of failure
threaten life or property. (Greenwood, 2001).
Further design considerations regarding the soil and plant selection are found in Sections 2.8 (Soil)
and 2.9 (Vegetation) respectively.
The most appropriate solution will be that defined by the “Minimum Energy Level”. This is
commonly defined as the minimum amount of intervention on the environment, which is required to
solve the problem. It is illustrated in Figure 2.6.1 and ranges from the lowest level of no intervention
through to the highest energy level, which may necessitate the construction of a massive retaining
structure, or a similar type of intervention.
A design index, which will help for choosing the most appropriate solution, is shown in Table 2.6.1.
The mechanism of soil reinforcement is straightforward. The inclusion of a reinforcement in the soil
serves to form a composite material whose shear strength is greater than that possessed by the soil
alone. The enhanced shear strength enables the soil reinforcement combination to carry loads
considerably greater than those that would be carried by the un-reinforced soil. For example, a slope
can be constructed at an angle greater than the natural angle of repose of the constituent soil by the
inclusion of appropriate horizontal reinforcement elements within the slope.
A comparison of reinforcement data for inert materials and biomaterials is shown in Table 2.6.2.
Biomaterials refer to both dead and living plants or their by-products. Examples range from
biodegradable soil blankets to deep-rooted planting systems.
Slope instability often requires the evaluation of both hydraulic and soil geotechnical parameters.
Experience indicates that there are three main causes of instability (Di Pietro, 2000). The causes,
which influence the solutions are summarised in Table 2.6.3. This is a continuation of the “minimum
energy level concept”.
Please contact African Gabions should you require assistance with stability analysis of earth slopes.
The bioengineered solution, which combines inert materials and biomaterials, must create (or
recreate) new habitats suitable for the life of animals and vegetal communities to improve the global
local environmental quality.
Table 2.7.1 outlines inert materials, whilst Table 2.7.2 outlines biomaterials, which can be used for
soil bioengineering. The information was partially taken from what has been established for the
International Geosynthetic Society (Italian directory of geosynthetics BE.MA (1998)). A summary of
the inert materials and biomaterials functions are given in Table 2.7.3 and Table 2.7.4 respectively.
When establishing plants, most failures are due to lack of appreciation of the meaning of the term
topsoil. What is well understood by geotechnical engineers are the properties of compacted soils.
Topsoil, however, must be consolidated – never compacted, as this will limit root growth in the soil.
Breaking down dead plant and animal matter by microbes results in a sticky material, humus. Around
which mineral particles adhere to form aggregates. These aggregates are irregular in shape, but are
generally 2–7 mm in diameter. Consequently, soil made of aggregates will have air spaces in its
profile.
Aggregates are referred to as crumbs by horticulturists. The humus of the crumbs provides the
nutrient resource and also absorbs moisture infiltrating through the soil. (See Figure 2.8.1).
The features of topsoil that are significant to successful plant growth and therefore soil bioengineering
are:
• Air in the soil profile is important as roots derive air for biochemical activity from the soil and not
from the leaves.
• Aerated soils will also regulate the soil temperature, making it suitable for plant growth.
• Moisture retained by the humus is constantly available to be drawn on by the root system while
plants are actively growing.
• Nutrients are maintained in the humus, and are available over an extended period.
The quality of the soil will directly determine the growth of surface vegetation.
1. The organic ‘Humus’ core that contains the nutrients and absorbs and holds moisture available to plant roots
2. The inorganic mineral particles that adhere to the irregular shaped ‘humus’
3. Spaces between ‘crumbs’ that allow excess water to drain away and then become the air spaces vital for root activity.
A soil analysis will identify any shortcomings in the suitability of topsoil for vegetating. Fertiliser
and compost requirements for “fixing” the soil should be specified.
Where reference is made to the use of soil in vegetating a structure, incorporation of local seed
varieties into the topsoil may help to promote the vegetation process.
2.9 Vegetation
It is recommended to consult a local plant specialist when determining which vegetation to use for
a project.
Increased shear strength of root permeation is a function mainly of the tensile strength of the roots and
the cross sectional area occupied by root fibres; the roots must be long and frictional enough to resist
pullout.
Another important positive effect of the vegetation is soil moisture depletion and interception, thus
increasing soil strength by mitigating or delaying the onset of saturated conditions in the soil.
Trees, together with grasses and shrubs, have been use to control erosion on slopes and to stabilise
landslides for many years. In a review on vegetation and slope stability Greenway (1987) indicated
that the majority of studies concluded that vegetation had a net stabilising effect on most slopes. He
did point out, however, that a few researches found the opposite to be the case. A summary of the
findings is shown in Table 2.9.1.
The study of tree roots and slope stability has received considerable attention in the last few decades.
Various models now exist to describe how tree roots contribute to slope stability, although many of
these models have yet to be validated by field data. Quantification of various aspects of tree roots is
not easy because of the difficulties of exhuming the root networks. Thus many models on slope
stability have been tested with little or no field data.
Choosing the most appropriate solution requires consideration of a number of factors, which are
summarised in the form of a checklist in Table 2.9.2.
A bio diverse application will give the best results. This type of application usually incorporates a
nursing (pioneer) species, which establishes easily, is fast growing and gives immediate protection.
The pioneer species are often dependent on a lot of nutrients, so their initial growth rate starts slowing
and they start to die off as initially high nutrient contents in the soil are depleted. At this stage, the
main vegetation, which is more sustainable and does not need as many nutrients, but grows slowly,
takes off.
Another important consideration is what the end function of the plant will be, for example:
• Woody vegetation has stronger and deeper root systems than herbaceous plants; therefore they are
better suited for shallow mass stability applications, where the roots can penetrate the subsoil for
“passive” anchorage.
• Herbaceous plants, such as grasses, legumes, and emergent aquatics provide a dense groundcover
that is well suited for preventing surface erosion and intercepting rainfall. This provides “active”
anchorage.
• Emergent aquatic plants may be tolerant to submerged conditions.
Plant establishment is the most critical phase. Adequate watering requirements must be met at this
stage of the plant life cycle. Care must be taken not to over-water the site, as this could lead to failure
of the structure due to slope instability.
• Plants and material should be monitored for three to four weeks after installation to ensure the
success and survival of the plants and integrity of the material.
• The plant roots need to be covered and kept moist.
• All material should be checked periodically or after storms to ensure they remain properly
secured. Make necessary repairs promptly.
• All temporary and permanent erosion control practises shall be maintained and repaired as needed
to ensure continued performance of their intended use.
Jute Netting (BioJute): BioJute is a coarse, biodegradable fabric woven into an open mesh from
rugged heavy jute yarn.
EcoLog™: An EcoLog™ is a cylindrical biodegradable roll, lined with BioMac™ coir blanket and
bound together with twine. The EcoLog™ can be pre-filled with organic matter and/or a combination
of rocks and soil.
Coir Roll: Coir rolls are cylindrical, biodegradable rolls manufactured from a high-density coconut
husk fibre with an exterior netting of 100% coir mesh. The coir material is natural, long lasting and
has high a tensile strength.
EcoGabion: The EcoGabion is a PVC coated gabion that has been modified to facilitate greening.
Type 1 is a trapezoidal gabion made with an inclined front face of 70 degrees. Type 2 is a rectangular
gabion and is also referred to as an EnviroLog.
Green Terramesh™: Green Terramesh™ is an environmentally friendly modular system used for
soil reinforcement in mechanically stabilised earth slopes and embankments.
Gabions and Reno mattresses: Gabions and Reno mattress units are made from hexagonally woven
double twist wire mesh. They are filled with stones to form monolithic flexible structures that are free
draining.
GeoMac™ mattresses: A GeoMac™ mattress is a Reno Mattress that has been modified to facilitate
greening of steep and impermeable slopes.
3.1.1 Definition
BioMac™ is a biodegradable coir mat manufactured from randomly arranged coconut husk fibres
layered between photosensitive polypropylene netting.
3.1.2 Purpose
BioMac™ is an Erosion Control Blanket (ECB).
BioMac™’s three-ply composite provides immediate erosion control and a stable medium to support
healthy plant growth. The closely arranged fibres intercept the energies of impacting raindrops and
water scour, keeping the underlying soil in place. The dense mat acts as mulch, creating a localised
water reservoir for the soil below.
With time the coir material biodegrades, enhancing the soil fertilisation and the cohesive strength of
the root systems. At this point the flexible nature of the plants becomes the primary stabilising and
protecting element. Depending on climate conditions, the biodegradation period is typically 2-3
years.
BioMac™ provides nature with a helping hand at erosion control and vegetation generation.
3.1.3 Specifications
BioMac™ specifications are listed in Table3.1.1.
BIOMAC™
BENEFIT FEATURE
3.1.5 Applications
Areas of application include:
• Greening of engineered structures such as Gabions, Reno mattresses and retaining structures e.g.
Terramesh™.
• Embankments and slopes.
• Sound barriers.
• Protection and restoration of wetlands.
• Streams, rivers, canal banks and drainage channels.
• Beach and sand dune stabilisation.
• Quarry, landfill and spoil heap restoration.
• Mulch mats.
• Golf courses, amenity areas, parks and sports fields.
• Manufacture of other soil bioengineering products e.g. Ecologs™.
• Pegs, whether they are steel, wooden or live stakes should be used to secure the mat. (Refer to
Appendix A for fixing guideline).
• Vegetation such as rooted seedlings can be planted through the coir mats.
• Coir mats can also be vegetated by seeding the slope. Seeding can be done before or after
installation of the mat, using either seeded topsoil or hydroseeding.
• Put topsoil above BioMac™ before pinning it down to ensure better contact with the underlying
soil, thereby preventing the plants from lifting the mat. This will also help to prevent tearing of
the mat.
BioMac™ ECB installation guidelines for slope installation are shown in Table 3.1.3 and Figures
3.1.1 and 3.1.2. Channel installation considerations are listed in Table 3.1.4.
3.2.1 Definition
BioJute is a coarse, biodegradable fabric woven into an open mesh from rugged heavy jute yarn.
3.2.2 Purpose
BioJute is an Erosion Control Blanket (ECB).
BioJute’s woven mesh provides immediate erosion control and a stable medium to support healthy
plant growth.
Approximately 60% of the area is open, allowing light, water and nutrients to pass through easily to
the underlying soil. The open mesh provides a “trap” for soil, seeds, water and nutrients. The jute
retains water, creating a localised water reservoir for the soil below.
With time the jute material biodegrades, enhancing the soil fertilisation and the cohesive strength of
the root systems. At this point the flexible nature of the plants becomes the primary stabilising and
protecting element. Depending on climate conditions, the biodegradation period is typically 1-2 years.
BioJute provides nature with a helping hand at erosion control and vegetation generation.
3.2.3 Specifications
BioJute specifications are listed in Table 3.2.1
BIOJUTE
BJ250 BJ500
Mass (g/m²) 250 500
Max. water retention (l/m²) 1.25 2.5
Yarn Diameter (mm) 2-4 4-7
% open area 70 60
Supply Size Bales: 10 pieces (1.22m x 50m) = 610 m² *
*Mini-packs are available on request i.e. One piece (1.22m x 50m) = 61m²
3.2.4 Benefits and features
The benefits and features of BioJute are shown in Table 3.2.2.
BENEFIT FEATURE
Growth promotion The open mesh structure allows light, water and nutrients to easily pass
through to the underlying soil.
Ideal for soil bioengineering Useful with the use of vegetation for erosion control.
applications
Environmentally friendly The BioJute biodegrades completely within 1-2 years.
Soil fertiliser Decomposition of the natural fibres within the net improves the soil
organic content, permeability and moisture retention ability.
Cost effective Lower costs compared to synthetic geotextiles.
Ease of installation BioJute is lightweight and easy to install on sites with difficult access. It is
easily cut and shaped by unskilled labour to accommodate existing
topographical conditions.
Successful technical performance Studies have been conducted by the “Institut fur Geotechnik und
Grundbau” of the University GH Siegen, Germany.
3.2.5 Applications
BioJute is used where soil surfaces require protection from erosion prior to the establishment of
vegetation cover. It is ideally suited for the protection of slopes.
Slope installation guidelines for BioJute ECB are shown in table 3.2.3.
3.3.1 Definition
MacMat™ is a three-dimensional geomat consisting of entangled polypropylene monofilaments that
are heat bonded at the contact points to provide a dimensionally stable matrix for soil erosion
protection from wind, rainfall, run-off or flooding. It is a permanent erosion control product
composed of UV stabilised, non- degradable synthetic fibres.
3.3.2 Purpose
MacMat™ provides permanent erosion protection on upland slopes, stream banks, wetland
boundaries, and shorelines. The mats provide a stable medium to encourage natural colonisation and
support healthy plant growth.
Initially the geomat blanket works to shield the soil slope form the effects of wind and rainfall,
preventing the soil from washing out before the vegetation has a chance to become established. Then,
as the vegetation matures, the roots anchor the mat to the soil to provide superior soil reinforcement
strength, capable of handling steeper embankment slopes and higher run-off flow velocities.
3.3.3 Specifications
MacMat™ specifications are listed in Table 3.3.1.
MACMAT™
3.3.4 MacMat-R™
MacMat-R™ is a unique composite material of MacMat™ and African Gabions’ double twisted
hexagonal mesh reinforcement.
This unique combination marries the excellent anti-erosion properties of the three-dimensional
MacMat™ geomat and the well-known strength properties of the African Gabions mesh, thus
extending the range of applications and diversity of MacMat™.
More specifically:
Due to the extra strength, MacMat-R™ can be used in more critical applications and in applications
complementary to other existing African Gabions products, including:
• Steep Slopes and embankments.
• Combination rockfall netting /slope-vegetation.
• Liner cappings to hold a topsoil cover.
• Lids to Reno Mattresses (GeoMac).
• Green Terramesh™ - ‘Water’ Type
The Utah Water Research Laboratory (UWRL) performed a research project on MacMat™ at the
Utah State University. MacMat™’s performance in a high velocity, erodable-bed flume was tested
and compared to bare soil control conditions. The tests were conducted between August 1995 and
March 1996. Contact African Gabions for a copy of the test results.
Vegetate the ECB as per the design with grasses, aquatic plants, rooted cuttings, seeded topsoil or
hydroseeding.
The site should be watered within 24 hours and thereafter at regular intervals, as required until such time as
acceptable vegetation cover has been established. Keep animal stock off until this time.
3.4 EcoLog™
3.4.1 Definition
An EcoLog™ is a cylindrical biodegradable roll, lined with BioMac™ coir blanket and bound
together with twine. The EcoLog™ can be pre-filled with organic matter and / or a combination of
rocks and soil.
Reinforced EcoLogs™ are lined with a mesh reinforcement made of galvanised PVC coated wire, for
heavy-duty applications (Photo 3.4.1.)
3.4.2 Purpose
The EcoLogs™ are designed to reduce erosion and assist in the germination, establishment and / or
anchorage of vegetation by trapping sediments and provide a biodegradable medium for plant
nutrition.
3.4.3 Specifications
EcoLog™ specifications are shown in Table 3.4.1.
ECOLOG™
3.4.5 Applications
• Immediate and long-term erosion control protection for embankments.
• Prevention of gully formation.
• Aids the establishment of vegetative cover by creating hospitable conditions.
• EcoLogs™ help to slow water velocities and trap sediment down embankments – intercept sheet
flow.
• Greening of gabion structures.
• Used in conjunction with other bioengineering techniques, e.g. Vetiver Grass technology.
3.5.1 Definition
Coir rolls are cylindrical, biodegradable rolls manufactured from a high-density coconut husk fibre
with an exterior netting of 100% coir mesh. The coir material is natural, long lasting and has high a
tensile strength.
3.5.2 Purpose
Coir rolls are commonly used for stream bank stabilisation and shoreline protection on low energy
flows. These components provide immediate erosion control and a stable medium to support healthy
herbaceous plant growth. Eventually (4–8 years), the coir material biodegrades and the cohesive
strength of the root systems and flexible nature of the plants become the primary stabilising element.
3.5.3 Specifications
Coir Roll specifications are listed in Table 3.5.1
COIR ROLL
Length (m) 2 to 6
Diameter (m) 0.2 0.3 0.4
Weight (kg/m) 4 8 14
Material 100% coir fibre
Netting Coir fibre netting of 50 mm squares; immovable, knotted coir yarn.
3.5.5 Applications
• To provide stabilisation along low energy stream and wetland boundary, and along shoreline
systems.
• Provides immediate erosion control and creates favourable conditions for healthy plant
establishment.
• Protection and mitigation of wetlands.
NOTE: Rooted/ leafed condition of the plant material is not representative at the time of installation.
FIGURE 3.5.1: CROSS SECTION OF A COIR ROLL
3.6 EcoGabion
3.6.1 Definition
The EcoGabion is a PVC coated gabion that has been modified to facilitate greening. Type 1 is a
trapezoidal gabion made with an inclined front face of 70 degrees (Figure 3.6.1.). Type 2 is a
rectangular gabion and is also referred to as an EnviroLog (Figure 3.6.2). Both types of EcoGabions
are lined with a coconut fibre blanket (BioMac™). BioMac™ is used to contain soil and act as a
substrate for insertion of rooted plants. The unit is filled with a combination of stone and soil.
3.6.2 Purpose
EcoGabions are used as revetments for erosion control or for stream bank and shoreline protection.
They provide immediate erosion protection and create hospitable conditions for healthy plant growth
on steep embankments.
The inclined front face of the Type 1 EcoGabion facilitates the deposition of sediment and growth of
plants.
3.6.3 Specifications
Specifications for EcoGabions are shown in Table 3.6.1.
• Various vegetation techniques can be used with this system, including: live stakes, brush layers,
rooted woody plants, herbaceous emergent aquatics and grasses. Vegetation techniques can be
incorporated during or after installation.
• Use site reconnaissance to identify plant species, growth form, soil and site conditions on adjacent
sites and compare their conditions to the construction site. Planting will be more successful as
soil, site and species selected match stable, vegetated nearby sites.
• The system provides increased strength and function once the vegetation is established.
• The toe of the slope and structure will be protected from undermining by installing the units into
the bed below the scour depth. These units are typically filled with stone.
Typical cross-sections of Type 1 and Type 2 EcoGabion structures are shown in Figure 3.6.3 and
Figure 3.6.4.
EcoGabions
Note: Rooted / leafed condition of the plant material is not representative at the time of installation.
FIGURE 3.6.4: CROSS SECTION OF AN ECOGABION: TYPE 2 STRUCTURE
Note: Rooted / leafed condition of the plant material may not be representative at the time of installation.
FIGURE 3.6.5: ECOGABION: TYPE 1 INSTALLATION
3.7.1 Definition
Green Terramesh™ is an environmentally friendly modular system used for soil reinforcement in
mechanically stabilised earth slopes and embankments.
5
1: Green
1: Green Terramesh
Terramesh™ unit
units H
2: Filling fill
2: Structural material
3: ECB
3: Geosynthetic blanket (ECB or TRM)
4: Vegetative
4: Vegetativecovercover
5: Vegetative soil fill
The main unit is fabricated from continuous, heavily galvanised and PVC coated steel wire, which is
woven into a double twisted hexagonal mesh configuration. Attached to the inside facing is a
geosynthetic or a biodegradable erosion control blanket (ECB), a welded steel panel, and two steel
brackets; pre-formed to a 700 slope angle.
Top Tail
Steel Bracket
Anchor
MacMat™ is generally recommended for applications where the slope will be in contact with running
water at a moderately low velocity (< 3 m/s), such as on riverbanks. It is also suitable for applications
where vegetation will take a long time to establish. BioMac™ is recommended in all other cases.
The welded steel panel placed behind the erosion blanket adds strength and provides support to the
facing while holding the blanket in place during the construction.
The top section of the main wire mesh unit is used to anchor and connect the unit to the one above.
3.7.2 Purpose
Green Terramesh™ systems are used as soil reinforcement in slope stability applications. This system
prevents erosion and integrates well into natural surrounding environments.
3.7.3 Specifications
Specifications for Green Terramesh™ are shown in Table 3.7.1.
BENEFITS FEATURES
Aesthetically pleasing Provides a wide variety of aesthetic “looks” ranging
from very natural using indigenous plants to tailored
using exotics.
Traps sediment Helps to slow water velocities near banks and trap
sediment.
Eco-friendly Aids in the establishment of a vegetative covering by
creating hospitable conditions for plant establishment.
3.7.5 Applications
• Green Terramesh™ is an alternative to near vertical retaining structures.
• Provides protection for rivers, stream banks and shorelines.
• Green Terramesh™ is ideal for land development projects on steepened landscape sites.
• Provides aquatic and riparian cover and wildlife habitat benefits.
• Provides a wide variety of aesthetic “looks” ranging from very natural using indigenous plants to
tailored using exotics.
• Provides immediate and long-term protection from surface erosion and geotechnical failures.
African Gabions provides computer software and technical support to assist in the design of Green
Terramesh™ structures. The MACSTARS program performs internal and external stability checks of the
reinforced structure and provides a detailed calculation report, cross sections, and stability analysis.
A typical cross section of a Green Terramesh™ structure is shown in Figure 3.7.2. Figure 3.7.3
shows Green Terramesh™ installation.
For detailed instructions refer to the Green Terramesh™ product installation guide.
3.8.1 Definitions
Gabions and Reno mattress units are made from hexagonally woven double twist wire mesh. They
are filled with stones to form monolithic flexible structures that are free draining.
3.8.2 Purpose
Gabion structures provide immediate and long-term protection from erosion and geotechnical failure.
They can be used for retaining walls, revetments, weirs and channel linings.
Vegetation and gabions / Reno mattresses have shown us their ability to co-exist by providing one
another with favourable conditions to develop. Once gabions and Reno mattresses are covered with
soil and roots, their durability, no longer restricted to the life of the wire, increases. Meanwhile,
plants find shelter for their roots in the structure and are able to flourish.
The growth of natural vegetation on a gabion structure is well documented by a long list of
photographic comparisons and technical literature. In 1994 research was conducted to analyse several
river’s reaches protected by gabion / mattress structures from a global environmental approach and to
compare them to unaltered reaches of the same rivers.
These investigations proved that gabions and Reno mattresses enhance the growth of indigenous plant
life, showing the product’s potential ability to help the natural recovery of destroyed or partially
damaged surrounding environment.
Wind and water passing through and over the stone fill will deposit soil and seeds into the voids
between the rocks. After ±5-10 and ±10–20 years for wet and dry applications respectively, the
structure will be naturally vegetated.
In spite of evidence of these structures’ “natural greening” ability, a new design process, which
accelerates the natural greening process, is now spreading out. It consists of using double twist
hexagonal mesh structures along with living materials (plants) through the application of
environmental engineering techniques to speed up the process of consolidation.
Consolidation is the process whereby a stable state is reached within the structure. An ecosystem has
become established, which is no longer dependent on the inert materials that were used to create it.
BENEFIT FEATURE
Increase in soil Dries excessively wet sites through transpiration as the vegetation grows.
stability by reducing Provides for surface drainage and can positively affect the direction of seepage flow.
soil moisture
Increase soil stability
Reinforces the soil as roots develop, adding significant resistance to shallow sliding and
due to plant growth shear displacement for smaller slopes.
Improves water The heavily vegetated banks filter and slow storm water runoff and trap sediment,
quality thereby improving water quality.
Air quality The removal of harmful airborne chemicals and dust offer air quality improvement.
improvement Increased oxygen production.
Low maintenance The structure becomes self-maintaining and self-repairing.
Noise reduction Absorption of sound waves by the rocks, soil and vegetation.
Versatile Can be used in conjunction with conventional engineering systems.
Job creation Greening gabions is often labour intensive, due to hand planting requirements for
vegetation.
Environmental Supports indigenous plant species and wildlife habitat and speeds up ecological
benefits succession
Positive impact on Vegetation provides:
wildlife * • Shelter and nesting sites – protection from predators and floods;
• Shade – keeping the water cooler in summer and slowing the growth of algae;
• A source of food.
Aesthetics Indigenous plant species and wildlife habitats, improve the aesthetic appeal of the
structure.
Shelter Plants find shelter from the gabion materials in order for their roots to flourish.
Vandalism Vegetating the structure “removes” it from sight, assisting with the prevention of
vandalism.
Improved biological The filtering of water through the structure, and the consequent siltation within the
conditions voids and the growth of vegetation tend to improve the biological conditions, restoring
the natural ecosystem.
*Environment Agency, undated
• Greening is project specific. Refer to section 2.9 (Vegetation) for further information. Options
include:
o Seeded topsoil
o Hydroseeding
o Plant plugs
o Rooted cuttings
o Bulbs
o Grass / shrubs / creepers / trees
o Water margin plants – Provide bank erosion protection against water scour, wave
action, rainfall and animal traffic. Provide a natural habitat for eco-restoration.
o Grass sods (e.g. instant lawn)
Gabion Unit
Geotextile
BioMac™
Rooted plants
Note: Leafed condition of the plant material is not representative at the time of installation
FIGURE 3.8.3: CROSS SECTION OF VEGETATED GABION STRUCTURE
If space constraints do not allow for the installation of planter boxes, then rooted plants may be
planted into the backfill as shown in Figure 3.8.3.
3.9.1 Definition
A GeoMac™ mattress is a Reno Mattress that has been modified to facilitate greening of steep and
impermeable slopes.
A GeoMac™ mattress is lined with geotextile, filled with a combination of rock and soil and then
vegetated. It provides a long-term stable soil layer. Erosion of the soil fill can be controlled by
protection with either BioMac™ or MacMat™ below the mattress lids.
3.9.2 Purpose
GeoMac™ mattresses allow impermeable liners and rock-underlain slopes to be greened. With
appropriate rock or earth anchors, slopes of up to 700 may be greened.
3.9.3 Specifications
GeoMac™ specifications are shown in Table 3.9.1.
BENEFIT FEATURE
wet or dry slope solution or by other fixings. All units are laced together to
provide a single flexible protection system.
Combining hard and soft engineering Hard engineering requirements for stabilising a bank
revetment are combined with the use of soil and
vegetation to produce a soft engineering approach
Brush Layering: Cuttings or branches of easily rooted shrub and tree species are layered between
successive lifts of soil fill to reconstruct a slope or embankment to its natural angle of repose.
Joint Planting: Joint planting is a system that installs live stakes between the joints of previously
placed riprap rock or gabion mattresses.
Live Fascine: Live fascines are linear bundles of live cut branches tied together with twine and
anchored in a trench with wooden stakes. The trenches are typically excavated by hand and follow
the contour of the slope or stream bank. Once the bundle has been secured in the trench, the trench is
back-filled with soil to a point where just the top of the bundle is exposed.
Live Staking: Live stake planting involves the insertion and tamping of live, vegetative, woody
cuttings into the ground in a manner that allows the live stake to take root and grow.
Eco Shutter: An Eco Shutter is an organic revetment made from woven plant materials. The shoots
are only partially trimmed, leaving a rough finish, which is more effective in trapping silt. Live plant
material can be introduced between the woven elements to facilitate the long-term stability of the
structure.
Pre-vegetated Blanket: Pre-vegetated blankets are erosion control blankets that have been
established with rooted vegetation prior to installation.
Vegetated Reinforced Soil System (VRSS): Vegetated reinforced soil systems can be constructed
using geogrids. Geogrids are high tensile strength polymeric panels formed by intersecting ribs joined
at the junctions. The reinforcing panels are wrapped around layers of soil with live cut branches,
rooted or herbaceous plants installed between the layers. The front face of the vegetated reinforced
soil system is lined with a coconut fibre or geosynthetic blanket.
Vetiver Grass Technology (VGT): Vetiver Grass Technology is an erosion control technology that
uses vegetative barriers (also referred to as grass hedges) made out of Vetiver (Vetiver zizanioides).
VGT is a low-cost, simple technology employing the vetiver grass for soil and water conservation and
environmental protection
4.1.1 Definition
A brush mattress is a combination of live stakes and cuttings or branches layered on the ground and
soil fill, forming a protective ground cover mattress.
4.1.2 Purpose
A brush mattress forms an immediate protective surface cover using a combination of living units. It
is useful for reducing local velocities and capturing debris and sediment.
A brush mattress system is used to stabilise the soil on a cut stream bank slope face, and is useful as a
buffer around wetlands.
A brush mattress made from thorn tree branches may be used to prevent animals from accessing an
area that you are trying to protect from livestock trampling.
4.1.3 Applications
• Provides immediate surface protection.
• Brush mattresses capture sediment during flooding, which assists in rebuilding the bank and the
establishment of both the installed vegetation and the capturing of new seeds for germination.
• Provides surface stability for the natural colonisation of plants from the surrounding plant
community.
• Enhances opportunities to restore wildlife corridors, food sources, nesting and protection.
• The heavily vegetated banks filter and slow storm water runoff, thereby improving water quality.
• A single brush mattress is typically 3 m in face measurement. They may be doubled on the slope
face, but if the slope is wet or excessively dry, it is not advisable to go higher than 3 m on the
slope face.
EcoGabion to
4.2.1 Definition
Cuttings or branches of easily rooted shrub and tree species are layered between successive lifts of
soil fill to reconstruct a slope or embankment to its natural angle of repose.
Brush layering is also used with vegetated reinforced soil systems and other bioengineering
applications, when constructing steepened slopes or embankments.
4.2.2 Purpose
This technique is used to stabilise cut and fill slopes, particularly road slopes where construction
disturbance has or will result in unstable soil conditions. Brush layering places live branches
approximately horizontal in successive layers up the face of the slope at its natural angle of repose.
The brush layer live cut branches, especially after rooting, add reinforcement to slopes by serving as
tensile inclusions, which provide a measure of frictional resistance to shallow sliding or other types of
surficial displacement. The protruding brush retards runoff and reduces surface erosion, by offering
direct overhanging surface protection.
Brush layering is best used concurrently with the construction of cut or fill slopes or embankments.
Cuttings are placed by hand while appropriate equipment is used to fill and compact each successive
lift of soil backfill. This practice is also a good remedial action to repair gullies on existing slopes.
4.2.3 Applications
• On cut slopes the live cut branches are placed on formed terraces that are dug into the slope face.
They are useful when deeper reinforcement is needed, beyond that which can be provided by the
live fascine method (see Section 4.5: Live fascines).
• The brush layer method is often combined with live fascines on slopes composed of low cohesive
soils.
• On fill slopes, the live cut branches are placed on formed terraces that are constructed during the
conventional backfill operations that form the new slope. These are useful when much deeper
reinforcement in needed.
• Brush layering breaks up a long slope into a series of shorter slopes separated by rows of
protruding branches.
• May be used on a slope with a steeper angle than the natural soil friction angle, by including
reinforcing materials for additional strength.
• Reinforces the soil surface initially with the branches and over time the roots develop, adding
resistance to shallow sliding and shear displacement for smaller slopes.
• Reinforce or protect the facing element using brush layering in combination with geogrids, wire
mesh reinforcement or coir netting.
• Useful for trapping debris on the slope and aids infiltration on cut sites. They are more useful on
dry cut slopes because of their deeper installation.
• Dries excessively wet sites through transpiration as the vegetation grows.
• Adjusts the site's microclimate, thus aiding seed germination and natural regeneration.
• Promotes natural invasion of plants from the surrounding plant community.
• Enhances the development of wildlife corridors, food sources, nesting and cover protection for
wildlife.
Place the live cut branches, 75- 150 mm thick, in a crisscross or overlapping configuration. The growing tips
should protrude 150- 300 mm from the slope face.
Immediately cover the brush layer branches with 150 mm of fill soil and compact lightly to ensure topsoil is
consolidated. Compact according to the construction specification.
Earth moving equipment should not travel directly over the cuttings. There must be at least 150 mm or more soil
between the brush layer branches and equipment at all times.
Fill and compact the soil placed above the brush layer in successive lifts, maximum 150- 200 mm in depth.
Install the next brush layer 0.75- 2.5 m (face measurement) above the previously installed row.
Seed and mulch slope using one half the normal seed weight. Slopes are generally seeded and mulched by hand.
Do not seed over the brush layer installation. Steeper slopes are seeded by hand with coir netting installed
between and beneath the layers of live cut branches.
4.3.1 Definition
Joint planting is a system that installs live stakes between the joints of previously placed riprap rock
or gabion mattresses.
4.3.2 Purpose
Joint planting increases the effectiveness of riprap rock or gabion mattresses by forming a living root
mat and water filtering system in the base upon which the riprap or gabion mattress have been placed.
Joint planting also increases sediment deposition, improves water quality, habitat value and aesthetics.
4.3.3 Applications
• Can be used on upland slopes, stream banks, riparian zones and wetland areas.
• Vegetation establishment improves aesthetics and provides cover by developing wildlife corridors
for movement, nesting, rearing, feeding, and resting areas.
• Joint planting enhances conditions for natural invasion and the establishment of other plants from
the surrounding plant community.
• Joint planting assists in protecting steep gradient stream banks from high flows.
• Acts as an energy dissipater on the stream bank.
• Through consolidation of the soil particles it helps to prevent the washout of fines.
4.4.1 Definition
A vegetated cribwall consists of a hollow, interlocking arrangement of logs or timbers, soil, rocks and
live cut branches.
4.4.2 Purpose
Live crib walls are used for slope stabilisation, usually at the toe of slopes, or for stream bank
protection applications. Vegetation improves the strength of the wall and improves the overall
aesthetics by screening the structural components.
4.4.3 Applications
• Stabilises the toe of a slope, protecting it against scouring and undermining.
• Useful where space is limited because it is a vertical or near vertical structure.
• Useful where a less intrusive more natural appearance is desired in a highly steepened area.
• The upper area may be used as a walking trail.
4.5.1 Definition
Live fascines are linear bundles of live cut branches tied together with twine and anchored in a trench
with wooden stakes. The trenches are typically excavated by hand and follow the contour of the slope
or stream bank. Once the bundle has been secured in the trench, the trench is back-filled with soil to a
point where just the top of the bundle is exposed.
4.5.2 Purpose
Live fascines are used to provide erosion and sedimentation control by increasing infiltration, slowing
or redirecting runoff, and trapping seed and sediments. The method provides immediate mechanical
surface slope stabilisation and shallow soil reinforcement through the development of the roots and
the subsequent vegetative growth. The ability of live fascines to function properly depends on the
quality and suitability of the materials used to construct the live fascine, the means and methods of
installation and the proper consideration of the site characteristics. For the live fascine to function
completely, it is important that the live fascine develops suitable growth. (ASTM, 2000)
The terraces formed by a series of live fascines trap sediment and debris. Infiltration is increased as
runoff is somewhat slowed. On dry sites this increases the available water for the initial establishment
of vegetation. On moist slopes the live fascines may be installed on angle to collect and direct water
across and down the slope.
4.5.3 Applications
• Live fascines may be used for road cuts, gullies or slumped areas, surface erosion sites on upland
slopes, shorelines, stream banks and along riparian and wetland buffers.
• Useful for the repair of small earth slips or to protect slopes from shallow slides that are
0.2- 0.3 m deep.
• Live fascines are useful on slopes requiring other planting materials such as container plants, live
stakes, grasses and legumes. Live fascines enhance conditions for natural colonisation and
improve the establishment of plants from the surrounding plant community.
• Live fascines are useful in the repair and prevention of rills and gullies by reducing the effective
slope length and thereby dissipating the energy of water moving down slope.
• Live fascines control surface erosion immediately after installation.
• Dries excessively wet sites through transpiration as the vegetation grows.
• Can trap and hold soil on stream bank by creating small dam-like structures and reducing the
slope length into a series of shorter slopes.
• Facilitates drainage when installed at an angle on the slope.
Firmly install the live fascines with one row of wooden stakes driven directly through the bundle and flush on
the top exposed side of the live fascine bundle every metre. Install a live stake 0. 75 m long 1.0 m apart in
between the previously installed wooden stakes along the down slope side of the bundle, leaving 50- 70 mm
exposed above the ground elevation.
Overlap the tapered growing tips of adjacent live fascines on top of the basal ends and stake down. Use two
stakes at each bundle overlap.
Live stakes are typically 0.75 m long in most soils. Wooden stakes are typically 1 m long in unconsolidated soils
and 0.75 m long in cohesive soils.
Proper backfilling is essential to the successful mechanical function and growth of the live fascines. Backfill live
fascines with soil from the trench. Work the moist backfill into the live fascine bundle between the branches and
at each dead stout stake. A practical method to compact behind and below the bundle is by walking on it.
Ameliorate the excavated/ backfill soil as necessary to promote plant growth.
Repeat the proceeding steps to the top of the slope in the slope face.
The top of the bundle should be slightly visible when the installation is completed.
Seed and mulch slope as specified by hand in between the live fascine bundles. Erosion control blankets are
typically used to protect the slope in between the live fascine bundles from erosion until the vegetation is
established. Do not seed on top of the live fascine bundles as the competition with the grass may cause the live
fascines to perform poorly from the living aspects.
4.6.1 Definition
Live stake planting involves the insertion and tamping of live, vegetative, woody cuttings into the
ground in a manner that allows the live stake to take root and grow.
Live stakes are approximately 0.25-0.4 m in diameter and 0.6-0.75 m in length, with one end
sharpened to a point or a steep angular cut. (ASTM, 2000).
4.6.2 Purpose
A system of live stakes creates a root mat that stabilises the soil by reinforcing and binding soil
particles together and by extracting excess soil moisture. Over time top growth forms to protect the
soil surface and further enhance the system.
Live staking is a relatively simple procedure that is economical and fast to install. Live stakes may be
used as a primary anchoring mechanism in conjunction with other soil bioengineering practices, e.g.
coir mats and EcoLogs™. Live stakes are also used for stabilising stream banks near the waterline,
for small earth slips and for slump areas created by groundwater seepage.
4.6.3 Applications
• Repair of small, simple, shallow, local earth slips and slumps.
• Areas best suited for live staking are the bottoms and banks of small incipient gullies; sediment
fills behind check dams and bare gully banks.
• Live stakes can be tamped through interstices or openings in green gabions, Green Terramesh™,
or riprap, over time offering additional environmental, mechanical and aesthetic benefits.
• Live stakes can be used to anchor and enhance the effectiveness of live fascines, EcoLogs™,
erosion control blankets and other erosion control materials.
• Live staking improves conditions for the natural colonisation of the surrounding plant community.
• As a temporary measure, live staking performs an important function in stabilising and modifying
the soil, serving as a pioneer species until other plants become established.
• It is useful when a quick, simple and inexpensive repair is appropriate.
4.7.1 Definition
An Eco Shutter is an organic revetment made from woven plant materials. The shoots are only
partially trimmed, leaving a rough finish, which is more effective in trapping silt. Live plant material
can be introduced between the woven elements to facilitate the long-term stability of the structure.
4.7.2 Purpose
Eco Shutters provide soil protection and stability, which is required for the regeneration of a bank.
Eco Shutters can either be attached to vertical stakes and used as a bank revetment or placed on top of
gabions to function as planter boxes. Alternatively they may be pegged out flat on a sloping bank to
encourage silt deposition.
4.8.1 Definition
Pre-vegetated blankets are erosion control blankets that have been established with rooted vegetation
prior to installation.
4.8.2 Purpose
Pre-vegetated blankets provide immediate and long-term erosion protection on embankments,
shorelines, wetland boundaries and stream banks. The blankets provide a stable medium to support
the healthy growth and development of plants.
4.8.3 Applications
• Aids in the establishment of rapid vegetative cover.
• Protects stream banks, wetland boundaries and shorelines from erosion.
• Can be used on existing structural elements, such as gabion revetments, when the gabions are
filled with stone and soil.
• Useful when an instant vegetative cover is needed.
4.9.1 Definition
Vegetated reinforced soil systems can be constructed using geogrids. Geogrids are high tensile
strength polymeric panels formed by intersecting ribs joined at the junctions. The reinforcing panels
are wrapped around layers of soil with live cut branches, rooted or herbaceous plants installed in
between the layers. The front face of the vegetated reinforced soil system is lined with a coconut fibre
or geosynthetic blanket.
4.9.2 Purpose
Vegetated reinforced soil systems are used to stabilise slopes, particularly fill slopes. The reinforcing
anchors interact by friction and interlocking with the soil to achieve the desired stability. This system
integrates well into natural surrounding environments.
4.9.3 Applications
• Can be used for upland slopes, stream banks and shoreline areas.
• Provides immediate and long-term protection from surface erosion and geotechnical failures.
• Provides a wide range of aquatic and riparian cover and wildlife habitat benefits.
• Provides a wide variety of aesthetic “looks” ranging from very natural using indigenous plants to
tailored using exotics.
• Helps to slow near bank water velocities and trap sediment.
• Various vegetation techniques can be used with this system, including brush layering, live stakes
and rooted woody plants. Vegetation techniques are incorporated during installation of the
structure.
• VRSS’s can be complex and expensive.
• VRSS’s should, where appropriate, be used with soil bioengineering systems and vegetative
plantings to stabilise the upper bank and ensure a regenerative source of stream bank vegetation.
• A stable foundation is required.
Note: Leafed condition of the plant material is not representative at the time of installation.
FIGURE 4.9.2: CROSS SECTION OF A VEGETATED REINFORCED SOIL SYSTEM
4.10.1 Definition
Vetiver Grass Technology (VGT) is an erosion control technology that uses vegetative barriers (also
referred to as grass hedges) made out of Vetiver (Vetiver zizanioides). VGT is a low-cost, simple
technology employing the vetiver grass for soil and water conservation and environmental protection.
4.10.2 Purpose
VGT is a practical, inexpensive, low maintenance, effective means of soil erosion and sediment
control, water conservation, land stabilisation and rehabilitation. Being vegetative, it is also
environmentally friendly.
When planted in rows vetiver plants will form a dense hedge, a living porous barrier that slows and
spreads runoff water and traps sediment. As water flow is slowed down, its erosive power is reduced.
This allows more time for water to infiltrate the soil, and for eroded material to be trapped by the
hedges. Therefore an effective hedge will reduce soil erosion and act as a filter, conserving soil
moisture and trapping sediment on site.
Due to its special morphological characteristics such as stiff and erect stems, extensive and deep root
systems (Figure 4.10.1), vetiver has provided a very effective means of trapping sediment (Figure
4.10.2) flood erosion control and steep slope stabilisation.
4.10.3 Specifications
Vetiver specifications are shown in Table 4.10.1.
conditions annual burning of vetiver hedges will greatly reduce the incidence of termite
damage due to burn out of dead plant material.
Longevity Vetiver is known to live for a long time. The longest recorded period is about 60 years (at
Msamfu Research Station in Zambia). It normally survives ±40 years.
4.10.5 Applications
• Soil and water conservation:
o Contour hedging;
o Terraced landscape support;
o Erosion gully interception;
o River bank protection e.g. wing walls;
o Dam wall protection;
For detailed planting guidelines please contact the South African Vetiver Network (SAVN) or refer to the green
book, which may be found on the SAVN website: (WWW.INR.UNP.AC.ZA/VETIVER).
5 DESIGN SOFTWARE
Macra 1 (2002) allows the user to verify the channel section using different longitudinal protection
works.
The MACRA1/Bank Protection software was developed to provide engineers with a rapid and
efficient tool with which to conduct the stability analysis of watercourse cross-sections with respect to
both water flow and wave motion. This program allows the user to check a large number of hydraulic
conditions of watercourse sections lined with Maccaferri (African Gabions) products, such as gabions,
Reno mattresses and MacMat™, as well as with the most widespread soil bioengineering techniques.
The software, working in an AutoCAD format, allows the engineer to design the river training works
in a stretch of river under the conditions of steady flow, taking into account the river geometry,
roughness, structure dimensions and flow.
It is generally advised to approach a river training design by allowing streams to maintain the most
natural geometry, and combining experience and best management practices to establish the most
environmentally friendly protective system.
Designing river training works using an environmentally friendly approach will often require you to
take account of the vegetation establishment over time. This will most likely have an effect on the
flow conveyance and on the material’s allowable shear resistance. It is recommended in this case to
verify the channel section under two scenarios:
End of installation, where the river section will provide the maximum flow conveyance (due to the
low roughness), and the protective system the lowest allowable shear resistance. This condition will
normally be critical to the protection used and is dependent on the inert materials only.
Vegetation completely grown, where the resistance to erosion will be higher due to the consolidating
effect of the roots. Vegetation will most likely reduce the river conveyance section due to the
increased roughness and reduced cross sectional flow area. Design flow capacity with the vegetation
completely grown (minimum 3 years after end of installation) needs to be verified.
The software gives the user the roughness and shear resistance values for the situation at the end of
installation: the user must execute the checks for the situation with vegetation completely grown.
The following tables give the fundamental parameters (τc, τl, n) taken into account in the bank
protection calculation where:
τc critical shear stress
τl limit shear stress
n Manning’s n roughness coefficient
(b) = The coefficient shall be computed on the basis of the real typology of the work, taking into account
shape and dimensions of the stones using equation n=0.0385d901/6
(c) = The actual resistant shear stress depends on the stone dimensions and may be computed using
equation τc = C*(γs- γw)dm
(d) = Depends on the vegetation growth.
MINOR STREAMS (top width at flood stage < 30m) Minimum Normal Maximum
n n n
Streams on plain
1. Clean, straight, full stage, no rifts or deep pools 0.025 0.030 0.033
2. Same as above, but more stones and weeds 0.030 0.035 0.040
3. Clean, winding, some pools and shoals 0.033 0.040 0.045
4. Same as above, but some weeds and stones 0.035 0.045 0.050
5. Same as above, lover stages, more ineffective slopes and sections 0.040 0.048 0.055
6. Same as 4, but more stones 0.045 0.050 0.060
7. Sluggish reaches, weedy, deep pools 0.050 0.070 0.080
8. Very weedy reaches, deep pools, or floodways with heavy stand of 0.075 0.100 0.150
timber and underbrush
Mountain stream, no vegetation in channel, banks usually steep, trees
and brush along banks submerged at high stages
9. Bottom: gravels, cobbles and few boulders 0.030 0.040 0.050
10. Bottom: cobbles with large boulders 0.040 0.050 0.070
FLOOD PLAINS
Pasture, no brush
11. Short grass 0.025 0.030 0.035
12. High grass 0.030 0.035 0.050
Cultivated areas
13. No Crop 0.020 0.030 0.040
14. Mature row crops 0.025 0.035 0.045
15. Mature field crops 0.030 0.040 0.050
Brush
16. Scattered brush, heavy weeds 0.035 0.050 0.070
17. Light brush and trees, in winter 0.035 0.050 0.060
18. Light brush and trees, in summer 0.040 0.060 0.080
19. Medium to dense brush, in winter 0.045 0.070 0.110
20. Medium to dense brush, in summer 0.070 0.100 0.160
Trees
21. Dense willows, summer, straight 0.110 0.150 0.200
22. Cleared land with tree stumps, no sprouts 0.030 0.040 0.050
23. Same as above, but with heavy growth of sprouts 0.050 0.060 0.080
23. Heavy stand of timber, a few down trees, little undergrowth, flood 0.080 0.100 0.120
stage below branches
25. Same as above, but with flood stage reaching branches 0.100 0.120 0.160
MAJOR STREAMS (top width at flood stage > 30 m)
The n value is less than that for minor streams of similar description,
because banks offer less effective resistance.
26. Regular section with no boulders or brush 0.025 0.060
27. Irregular and rough section 0.035 0.100
Engineered designs of Green Terramesh™ structures may be verified using this programme.
An eco-compatible design approach requires analytical instruments, which assess the environmental
impact induced by river training works. The MAQUA program, which is being developed by
Maccaferri in Italy, provides the required support in choosing between different design solutions,
selecting the one with the minimum environmental impact to the existing ecosystem, while preserving
biodiversity.
Developed in a Windows format, the software enables the operator to design river training works and
watercourse management. It is based on the methodologies already used for environmental impact
assessments, such as the US Army Corps and Engineers’ habitat evaluation system and the Italian
National Institute for Energy and Environment’s MIVEC (Modello Interpretativo Valutazione Eco-
sistemi) interpretative model for the definition and assessment of ecosystems.
Vegetation can ameliorate many of the factors and conditions causing earth slope and riverbank
instability. But we cannot ask the plant, or better their roots, to provide us something they will never
be able to give us in the causes – effects – solution chronological scale.
If the problem is a lack of internal geotechnical equilibrium, we cannot take into account the soil
shear strength increase offered from the vegetation roots, because at the moment of the intervention,
after the failure, they do not exist, or demonstrate to be sufficient: the solution is the use of a
retaining structure (mass gravity or reinforced soil structure) that can solve the problem immediately.
If the problem is erosion control, we can use the widest range of solutions, from simple seeding
through the widest range of geosynthetics up to the heaviest stone revetment.
Today the global infrastructural solution must create (or re-create) new habitats suitable for the life of
animals and plant communities, whose aim is the improvement of the global local environmental
quality.
Combining these two concepts gives way to the soil bioengineering concept, where the most
appropriate inert material to provide an immediate solution, can be combined with plants to ultimately
create a complex, unique building block which is living as it is functioning in its restoration of a
natural ecosystem.
7 REFERENCES
African Gabions (Maccaferri). MAC.R.A 1 – Bank Protection Reference Manual.
Agostini, R., Cesario, L., Ferraiolo, F., Papetti, A., 1988. Flexible gabion and Reno mattress
structures in river and stream training works, Section two: Longitudinal structures, Officine
Maccaferri S.p.A. – Bologna, Italy.
ASTM, 2000. Standard Practice for Construction of Live Fascines on Slopes, Draft No. 2, April 4
2000.
Ciarla, M., Ferraiolo, F. and Malcevschi, S., 1995. New Design Criteria Respectful of the Needs of
the Environment, XXVI International Erosion Control Association Conference, March 1993, Atlanta,
Georgia, USA.
Chow, V.T., 1959. Open Channel Hydraulics, McGraw – Hill Book Co., New York, Toronto,
London.
Di Pietro, P. and Brunet, G., 2000. Design Considerations Related to the Performance of Erosion
Control Products Combined with Soil Bioengineering Techniques. ASTM Workshop: Testing and
Performance of Flexible Erosion Control Materials.
Di Pietro, P., 2000. Soil Bioengineering and Ecological Systems: Erosion problems in natural and
altered habitats can be controlled through the use of geosynthetics. In: Geotechnical Fabrics Report,
September 2000, Volume 18. Number 7.
Di Pietro, P. and Scotto, M., 1999. Grids And Steel Mesh Combine For Cost Savings, GFR,
September 1999, Volume 17, P 34-38.
DWAF, 1998. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Soil and Water Conservation: An Audit
of South African Approaches and Activities, Learning from South African Experience in Sustainable
Land Management.
Ellis, H., 2001. Natural Progression. In: Soil Bioengineering: Integrating Ecology with Engineering
Practice, Ground Engineering, March 2001.
Escarameia, M., 2001. The Right Choice for Erosion. In: Soil Bioengineering: Integrating Ecology
with Engineering Practice, Ground Engineering, March 2001.
Fischenich, J.C., 1997. Hydraulic Impacts of Riparian Vegetation – Summary of literature U.S.
Army of engineers – W.E.S.
Greenway, D.R., 1987. Vegetation and slope stability pp187-230 In: Anderson, M G, Richards, K S
(Eds) Slope stability Chichester, Wiley.
Greenwood, J., 2001. Rooting for Research. In: Soil Bioengineering: Integrating Ecology with
Engineering Practice, Ground Engineering, March 2001.
Maccaferri, 2000. Designs On The Market, Soil Nailing and Reinforced Soil. Ground Engineering,
February 2000.
Maccaferri, 1998. Hexagonal Double Twist Wire Mesh Product Training Guide.
Maccaferri, 1997. Hexagonal Double Twist Mesh Products applications Training Guide.
Maccaferri, 1997. For The Restoration And Training Of Fluvial Environments. Edition 1997: With
the results of a research on the environmental implication of gabions and Reno mattresses and new
bioengineering techniques.
Pilarczyk, K., 1997. Revetments in Hydraulic Engineering using Geosynthetics, Geosynthetics News
3, Akzo Nobel, 1997.
Sotir, 2001. The Value of Vegetation. In: Soil Bioengineering: Integrating Ecology with Engineering
Practice, Ground Engineering, March 2001.
Staten, P., 2001. Training up on Design. In: Soil Bioengineering: Integrating Ecology with
Engineering Practice, Ground Engineering, March 2001.
Truong, Dr. P. Asia-Pacific Conference and Exhibition on Ground and Water Bioengineering.
Vetiver Grass Technology for Erosion and Sediment Control, Slope Stabilisation and Environmental
Protection. SESSION 1: Introduction to Vetiver Grass Technology.
Varma, C.V.J., 1995. Management of Sediment – Philosophy, Aims and Techniques. Sixth
International Symposium of River Sedimentation, New Delhi.
Erosion Control Blanket (ECB) fixing patterns will vary depending on application type, slope length,
slope grade, soil type and annual rainfall. The fixing patterns shown above are based on slope length
and slope grade. Increased fixing rates may be necessary depending on site conditions.
Peg types include steel pegs, wooden stakes or live stakes. Steel pegs, 200 mm long (4 mm Ø) are
available from African Gabions.
For technical specifications or any other information on ECB’s, please contact your nearest African
Gabions’ Technical Department.
APPENDIX B
1. Biodegradable materials should never be stored for long periods in a building when wet as this
will lead to microbial action, decay and loss of strength.
2. If the material has to be stored outside prior to installation, it should be protected against rainfall
and kept clear of the ground to allow air circulation.
3. If the materials become wet they should be thoroughly dried if they are to be stored inside prior to
being used at a later date.
4. Storage for prolonged periods requires attention to temperature, humidity, air circulation and
stacking to minimise risk of moisture gain.
5. At site where the material is to be used within a short period, no special measures are required.
However, it should be noted that the biodegradable materials absorb water, and therefore should
be protected against rain. This will reduce problems in handling when the product is installed.
APPENDIX C
To ensure the correct ‘woven cloth’ is produced the Processing Quality Control Department of the
Factory unit carries out the following checks:
1. Check for correct weight of yarn supplied by batching department where the yarn is produced and
prepared.
2. Prior to spinning the yarn is checked for yarn diameter, moisture content and oil content of the
warp and weft threads.
3. A number of warp and weft threads are checked for compliance with the batch specification
during weaving process.
4. A check is carried out on the woven product for weaving faults and irregularities. Any rejected
cloth is recycled in the batching department.
5. Regular checks are carried out on the length and width of woven product pieces.
6. Only when all the above checks are satisfied as complying with the specification for the
production batch will the material be released.
The mill has an excellent quality control record and has been approved according to ISO 9002/1994,
certificate no. QSC/L 004111.
APPENDIX D