Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cecilia Maynard Unit 2 Assignment Jerome Kerviel Rogue Trader or Misguided Employee 1
Cecilia Maynard Unit 2 Assignment Jerome Kerviel Rogue Trader or Misguided Employee 1
Cecilia Maynard
Post University
Rogue Trader or Misguided Employee 2
Introduction
One hundred fifty-five years in the making, Société Générale is one of the oldest yet third
largest bank in France. Founded in 1864, Société Générale often nicknamed “SocGen” was
originated by a group of producers and investors during the second empire (Napoleon III reign).
The French banking has grown to serve 19.2 million individual clients in 76 countries. SocGen
operates in three major businesses: 1. Retail banking and financial services; 2. Global
investment management and services; and 3. Corporate and Investment banking. In 2006
SocGen was classified as 67 on the Fortune’s 2006 Global 500 which had built a $72 billion
position in Euro stock index futures. In the prior year, it had rated 152 on Fortune’s list which its
Jerome Kerviel an unmarried 31-year-old at the time worked for SocGen in the summer
of 2000. He began working in the middle class as a monitoring support role which he oversaw
the futures traders for five years. In 2005, he then got promoted as the junior trader (broker) to
the futures trading front desk. Kerviel job was arbitrage which he would trade European futures
by betting on the future execution of these funds. His trading surplus increased throughout the
year of 2007, as he continued to bet that the markets would fall during that time. When the year
ended Kerviel needed to disguise his gains, so he formed counterfeit losing positions to weaken
his gains. He was hindering more than $73.3 billion an excessive amount which exceeded
SocGen’s overall market cap of $52.6 billion. Although Kerviel was a rogue trader/misguided
Should other Individuals and the Bank be held Accountable for Kerviel Actions?
Yes, I strongly believe that other individuals and the bank should be held accountable for
Kerviel actions. He is not the only one responsible for these actions as he so mentioned himself
as being the “scapegoat”. Kerviel should be the first individual held responsible for these loses
for two reasons. First, he knew exactly what he was doing this malicious, evil, devious act that
was not right and against company policy. Second, his fraud activities were done deliberately of
Société Générale systems and system developers is next in line for being held responsible
for these loses. Meaning these systems demonstrated to be not safe, especially when the
expertise used in the fraud easily avoided the fraud detecting system. Also, alerts concerning
irregular accounts in the system were not set in motion at an effective rate, which made it
possible for Kerviel to further avoid being captured. In addition, the system did not detect the
Société Générale management team is the third to be blamed for these loses. First, the
fact that the management did not foresee probable fraud when they moved Kerviel between two
attached positions. Second, the internal control had scheduled checks on each trader’s books that
were known to Kerviel, which gave him the chance to fix any problems before these checks.
Third, the management team was not on top of things, meaning they should have put a stop to
this madness from the first beginning. Instead SocGen management neglected the action after it
discovered that the trading fraud had a meaningful impact on the world marketplace.
Rogue Trader or Misguided Employee 4
Describe What I Believe to have been Kerviel Personal & Professional Ethics
Professionally accepted standards of personal and business behavior, values and guiding
help guide members in performing their job functions according to sound and consistent ethical
Jerome Kerviel personal ethics moves towards the individualism side, someone who cashed on
free internal controls of society general. His independency may be controlled from the following
factors; such as a negative life experience or an overly aggressive financial career objective.
The ethical reasoning for his moral responsibility for the harmful effects of his actions
would be “1. He knowingly and freely acted or caused the act to happen and knew that his act
was morally wrong or hurtful to others and 2. He knowingly and freely failed to act or prevent a
harmful act, and he knew it would be morally wrong for him to do this.” (Weiss, 2014) On the
other hand, his professional ethics got washed away when he assured himself that nobody will
ever find out what he has done which led to breach of trust. He luxuriates into scandal at the
stake of the company which exceed to his credit limits. His actions were familiar to his superiors
and the loses were caused by fear selling by the bank. In addition, his actions were practiced by
Explain How A Stakeholder and Issues Analysis can help Me Understand this Case
The only way a stakeholder and an issues analysis can help me understand this case better
is by being honest. Meaning bringing forth all the evidence. Not keeping any information out.
Conclusion
In conclusion, no one knows what was going on in the mind of Jerome Kerviel at the
time, but what was certain that his actions had brought bankruptcy where he worked. He has
found a way to manipulate and suppress the system where he worked very well by analyzing his
weaknesses. However, regardless of the negative side caused by the institution where he
worked, Kerviel managed to make a lot of profits (gains). You know what they say, actions
speak louder than words. Some might call him genius but really, he should be called greedy with
a sinful nature.
Rogue Trader or Misguided Employee 6
References
Weiss, J. W. (2014). Chapter 2: Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, & Decision-Making Guidelines.
https://pages.stolaf.edu/ein/disciplines/personal-ethics/
What are professional ethics? definition and meaning. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://businessdictionary.com/definition/professional-ethics.html