This document provides an overview and criteria for a case study argument where students will argue whether ice melts faster in saltwater or freshwater and why it matters. The product will be a group presentation arguing their claim and providing evidence from their learning, as well as individual reflections. The group presentation should introduce the argument, summarize learning, and provide 3 pieces of evidence with a conclusion. Individual reflections will discuss how this experience differed from a traditional learning style, strengths/weaknesses, and advice for future students. A scoring rubric is also provided to evaluate the presentations.
This document provides an overview and criteria for a case study argument where students will argue whether ice melts faster in saltwater or freshwater and why it matters. The product will be a group presentation arguing their claim and providing evidence from their learning, as well as individual reflections. The group presentation should introduce the argument, summarize learning, and provide 3 pieces of evidence with a conclusion. Individual reflections will discuss how this experience differed from a traditional learning style, strengths/weaknesses, and advice for future students. A scoring rubric is also provided to evaluate the presentations.
This document provides an overview and criteria for a case study argument where students will argue whether ice melts faster in saltwater or freshwater and why it matters. The product will be a group presentation arguing their claim and providing evidence from their learning, as well as individual reflections. The group presentation should introduce the argument, summarize learning, and provide 3 pieces of evidence with a conclusion. Individual reflections will discuss how this experience differed from a traditional learning style, strengths/weaknesses, and advice for future students. A scoring rubric is also provided to evaluate the presentations.
This document provides an overview and criteria for a case study argument where students will argue whether ice melts faster in saltwater or freshwater and why it matters. The product will be a group presentation arguing their claim and providing evidence from their learning, as well as individual reflections. The group presentation should introduce the argument, summarize learning, and provide 3 pieces of evidence with a conclusion. Individual reflections will discuss how this experience differed from a traditional learning style, strengths/weaknesses, and advice for future students. A scoring rubric is also provided to evaluate the presentations.
Overview of Case Study Guiding Question: Does ice melt faster in saltwater or freshwater? Why does it matter?
Long-Term Learning Target: I can argue using evidence why ice melting faster or slower in saltwater compared to freshwater has an impact on the world we live in. (Short Term Learning targets can be found in the PowerPoint on Schoology)
Product: Argument using evidence from learning and research supporting the guiding question, and answering the Long-Term Learning Target.
Criteria for Argument Group Presentation supporting claim of “Why does it matter?” (First Slides) *Introduce Argument and Claim *Summarize learning experience in this case study *3 pieces of evidence from the learning we did in class and/or articles we have read *Short conclusion to bring together your pieces of evidence
Individual: (Last Slides-each person does the following, and at the end of the presentation each person will have time to present these sides) *How has this experience been different from a traditional/normal learning experience? We took a learning style quiz at the beginning of the year, has this helped you? *What were your strengths and weaknesses in this case study? *What advice would you give the freshmen next year doing this experience?
Template: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/19ZwUwrCNPMESfxbwKatbVMeIT8lE2fv1Ee6HyGnxJlw/edit?us p=sharing If your groups decides to use something other than slides just make sure it has the criteria listed above and fulfills the Rubric.
Rubric: 0 1 2 3 4 Introduction Not Present Many A few errors Well explained and X (Group) errors and/or claim makes sense and/or confusing confusing points Summarize Not Present Many A few errors Well explained X Learning errors and/or learning Experience and/or confusing experience and no (Group) confusing points errors 3 Pieces of Not Present Many 2 of the claims 1 of the claims does All 3 Pieces of Evidence errors do not make not make evidence support (Group) and/or sense/not sense/not claim with little to confusing thorough/many thorough/mistakes no errors mistakes Short Not Present Many A few errors Well explained X Conclusion errors and/or learning (Group) and/or confusing experience and no confusing points errors Explanation Not Present Many A few errors Well explained Student shows of errors and/or learning great amount of Experience and/or confusing experience reflection and well (Individual) confusing points explained Strengths Not Present Many A few errors Well explained Student shows and errors and/or learning great amount of Weaknesses and/or confusing experience reflection and well (Individual) confusing points explained Advice Not Present Some Well explained X X (individual) errors learning and/or experience and confusing no errors
Total: _____________/20pts
Scoring for Portfolio: 0=0pts 1-5=1pt 6-10=2pts 11-15=3pts 16-20=4pts