Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PL RBI Germanischerlloyd1 PDF
PL RBI Germanischerlloyd1 PDF
Practice
Dr. Gundula Stadie-Frohbös / Dr. Felix Weise
www.futureship.net
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and
Practice
• Short Presentation of GL
• Introduction / Basics
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 2
GL is global service provider in maritime and energy
market (oil & gas, renewables)
1.050 Australia,
Africa
Oil & Gas (GL Noble Denton) Pacific
100 350
Technical Assurance
GL offices
Engineering Consulting
Employees
Asset Performance & Maintenance
Marine Operations & Consulting
Strong growth accelerated by acquisitions
Project Execution [EURm] 800
Software Products
567
Renewables (GL Garrad Hassan) 430
Certification 429
370 231
Engineering Consulting 327 128
270 89
Marine Operations 205 208 222 72
184 56
Industrial 35 43 43 50 336 370
Measurements 255 281 301
Maritime 149 162 165 172 214
Software Products
Training
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 3
Introduction / Basics
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 4
Reasons for leakage
Nat. Hazard
0%
Material - steel
defect Other Anchor
8% 14% 16%
Material - weld
Impact
defects
18%
6%
Structural
0%
Corrosion
38%
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 5
Introduction: What is risk?
Risk - understanding
Conceptual design
Detailed design
Construction
Commissioning
Decommissioning
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 7
Risk method – Example
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 8
GALIOM for Pipelines
Consequence of a
Risk = PoF × CoF failure (CoF) shall
be assessed
Design Index Third Party Index carefully!
Probability
Risk is the
of failure
combination of
PoFIndex
PoF and CoF
Corrosion Index Operation Index
Economical Environmental
consequence impact
Probability of
Consequence
failure (PoF) can Location of failure
often be estimated! Class
Reputation
Main technical Operation Human safety and political
Pressure
aspects are consequence
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 9
Probability of failure | Two track concept
Semi - quantitative approach
increasing decreasing
Results used to
generate inspection
strategy which
considers cost
and safety aspects.
Conse-
Negligible
Medium
Serious
Risk development for two quence
High
Low
Flaw A equivalent corrosion flaws, Negligible
B B B B
with same corrosion growth, Low
0.8 2012
0.6
2008
a/t
0.4 2004
0.2
2000
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
c/D Flaw B
Flaw assessment according to RSTRENG Flaw A
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 12
Example: Pipeline
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 13
Pipeline
Outer diameter Wall thickness Operating pressure Medium Age
32 in 30 mm 200 bar Crude oil 29 Jahre
Changing risk
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 14
Evaluation of design index
100
More precise information
80
about the influences of
60 different topics on the
individual phases of the
40
“life cycle”, here: “Design”
20 with respect to failure
probability.
0
y
g
ue
re
an
il
s
ks
ilit
So
rin
ck
su
ec
tig
Sp
ab
he
ctu
es
ch
Fa
St
ee
lc
fa
Pr
l
a
ca
om
Fr
nu
ob
Lo
Ma
ott
Gl
-b
On
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 15
Assessment of remaining life time - example
80.00
70.00
60.00
Remaining life time [years]
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Fatigue Corrosion Design
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 16
Displaying risk in GALIOM
Risk displayed in a
Risk 5 x 5 risk matrix
Medi
um
1
High
2
Serio
us
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 18
What are the Advantages of Performing RBI
• Distinct knowledge of Deterioration Modes and Mechanisms that are affecting
equipment
Look Less – More Focus
• Reduction in Shutdown Inspections in favour of On-Stream Methodologies
Shorter Shutdowns – Greater Availability
• Develop Run to Failure methodologies for Low Consequence Equipment
Reduced Maintenance – Cost Saving
• Reduction in Unforeseen Repairs
Greater Availability
• Ability to identify Risk Mitigation Measures to reduce either the Consequence of
Failure or Probability of Failure
Improved Safety
RBI for Offshore Pipelines – Challenges in Theory and Practice | 2011-12-01 | No. 19
Thanks for your attention!
Contact details:
Email: gsf@gl-group.com
www.futureship.net