Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scientific Project Guidelines PDF
Scientific Project Guidelines PDF
Scientific Project Guidelines PDF
SCIENCE
Scientific Project Guidelines
Editors | Siti Aishah Mohd Ali | Carolyn Melissa Payus | Vun Leong Wan |
Editors
Siti Aishah Mohd Ali
Carolyn Melissa Payus
Vun Leong Wan
2015
i
First Published 2015
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval
system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or
recording, without prior written permission from the Faculty of Science and Natural
Resources, UMS.
ISBN 978-967-0582-37-5
ii
PREFACE
This book seeks to provide guidance and instructions
for final year undergraduate students of
Environmental Science Programme, Faculty of
Science and Natural Resources (FSSA).
Our aim in writing this guideline is to assist the final year students in understanding the
structure and procedures so that they can carry out their scientific research systematically
and in an organized manner.
The book is divided into 11 main chapters on the topics of scientific project management,
type of research projects, literature research, research proposal, sampling design in
environmental research, how to design a questionnaire in environmental science research,
secondary data sources for research, statistics for environmental research, scientific project
report and assessment guidelines. In addition, this book also contains the relevant forms and
planner needed. We hope that this book it will help students to manage and complete their
scientific research project successfully.
In the process of writing and materializing of this book, we have received bundle of
references from various sources of literatures both in printed and also electronic forms
which have been appropriately cited and acknowledged.
We would particularly like to express our gratitude to Faculty of Science and Natural
Resources for printing and publishing this book. Last but not least, we thank our family and
colleagues, for their support, patience and understanding during the process of planning,
preparing and writing of the book. Thank you.
July 2015
iii
CONTENTS
Preface iii
Contents iv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Siti Aishah Binti Mohd Ali
3.1 INTRODUCTION 10
3.2 PRIMARY RESEARCH 10
Local Field Research 10
Laboratory Research 10
3.3 SECONDARY RESEARCH 11
3.4 EXAMPLES OF SCIENTIFIC PROJECT 11
iv
CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Vun Leong Wan
CHAPTER 7 QUESTIONNAIRE
Carolyn Melissa Payus & Vun Leong Wan
v
CHAPTER 8 SECONDARY DATA SOURCES FOR RESEARCH
Vun Leong Wan & Ahmad Norazhar Mohd Yatim
8.1 INTRODUCTION 40
8.2 WHAT IS SECONDARY DATA? 40
Using Secondary Data Inferior to Primary Data? 40
What is not Secondary Data? 41
Sources of Secondary Data 41
Where to Begin? 41
8.3 QUALITY CONTROL 42
8.4 WHY DO WE USE SECONDARY DATA? 42
8.5 ADVANTAGES OF USING SECONDARY DATA 42
8.6 DISADVANTAGES OF USING SECONDARY DATA 43
vi
CHAPTER 11
ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES
Siti Aishah Binti Mohd Ali
81
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
References 85
Appendixes
vii
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
INTRODUCTION
1
1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE SCIENTIFIC PROJECT
Undergraduate scientific project is a subject where the students have to design, execute,
analyze and disseminate their research ideas. Third year students are required to carry out a
scientific project independently and submit a formal written report at the end of each
semester. This scientific project is a substantial research work that will require students to
grasp the theoretical and practical aspects of scientific research. The nature of the project is
either field studies, laboratory-based or environmental modeling work within the fields of
environmental science.
This scientific project aims to give a clear understanding of the concept of research in
environmental science that will allow students to become more familiar with the actual
research environment. This research based learning courses also serves as an introduction to
the development of logical, analytical thinking and deductive reasoning.
A project proposal covers background of the study and problem statement, literature review,
methodology, written report and presentation. Project proposal also involves execution of the
research plans that have been developed and will be evaluated. The students will undertake
an independent research work on the approved proposal topic in consultation with the
respective supervisor. The results will be subsequently analyzed, interpreted, discussed and
finally presented as a written scientific report.
This scientific project is to be undertaken in two phases over the period of two semesters, in
which each phase carries its own number of credits. Scientific Project 1 carries 3 credits hour
and needs to be done in the first semester of the final year. It is a prerequisite for scientific
Project 2, which means that students must register and pass scientific Project 1 before they
can proceed to scientific Project 2 in the following semester. Scientific Project 2 carries 6
credit hours and needs to be done in the second semester of the final year.
1
Chapter 1: Introduction
In semester 1, students are required to prepare a research proposal and present it for
endorsement and assessment. For scientific Project 1, students will need to prepare chapters
on introduction, literature review and methodology. Supervisors will assess the students
based on their initiative and management of the project. In semester 2, at the completion of
research project, students will have to write up a complete dissertation/thesis and submit it
for examination and viva-voce. The scientific project is assessed in three sections:
Note: Scientific Project 1 carries 3 credit hours; Scientific Project 2 carries 6 credit hours.
2
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
2
SCIENTIFIC PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
Students are encouraged to propose their own project titles. However, students can also get
topics/titles from the prospective supervisors. If the students are interested in any of the
academic staff’s project, the student should contact the respective academic staff at the
earliest opportunity. There is no guarantee that the student will be allocated for their
preferred project.
Whether the student chooses their own topic or the academic staff project, there are a
number of conditions that they have to consider. The project must contain both a theoretical
and a practical component which covers identifying a problem and developing a solution to
the problem.
A work plan is needed to demonstrate that a student have a clear ideas of how to
proceed with the scientific project.
The student should identify activities and allocate time accordingly within the two (2)
semesters. Figure 2.1 and 2.2 shows scientific project planning activities.
The planning should take into account factors such as the workload from other
courses and the various deadlines that the students need to follow.
3
Chapter 2: Scientific Project Management
SEMESTER 1
SUBMISSION HS11-SP01
Week 2
FORM
METHODOLOGY Chapter 3:
• Research design
• Sampling Methods
• Data collection methods
• Research procedures
• Data analysis methods
• Gantt Chart
PROPOSAL Week 14
PRESENTATION
4
Chapter 2: Scientific Project Management
SEMESTER2
VIVA-VOCE Week 14
PRESENTATION
5
Chapter 2: Scientific Project Management
The research focus for the academic staffs is shown in Table 2.1.
Hydrology/
Prof. Dr. Kawi Bidin Environmental Hydrology
Hydro-geomorfology
Atmospheric Chemistry /
Ms. Carolyn Melissa Atmospheric Chemistry /
Environmental Law/ Water
Payus Environmental Law / Water Resource
Resource
Ms. Siti Aishah Binti
Environmental Chemistry Environmental Chemistry
Mohd. Ali
6
Chapter 2: Scientific Project Management
The approval of the supervisor is needed to change the project title. This request needs to be
submitted to the scientific project coordinator for processing. The scientific project
committee in the programme does not encourage the change of supervisor. For special case
where the change of supervisor is necessary, the existing and the new supervisor, together
with the student must all agree with the changes. The scientific project coordinator’s
endorsement is necessary before the request is submitted to the scientific project committee
in the programme.
A supervisor is an academic staff to whom the students were allocated and responsible
for guiding the students with the scientific project.
As the supervisor, he/she will guide, direct, advice and assess the student through
every stages of the scientific project until completion.
However, it is NOT the supervisor responsible to do the work for their students.
The supervisor will assist the students on the technical part of the project which
covers sampling, lab and data analysis where necessary.
It is the supervisor responsibility to encourage initiative in the students to take
responsibility for their work and not overly dependent on their supervisor.
The discussion between the supervisor and the students should not be the supervisor
telling the students on what and how to do his/her project.
The supervisors are expected to be understanding, courteous and considerate with
their students.
The supervisor and the student should meet regularly at time and place suits to them.
If the supervisor has some difficulties or problem with their student’s performance,
he/she should communicate and discuss it with the scientific project coordinator.
The ratio supervisor between students should not exceed 10 students per supervisor.
The ultimate responsibility for the completion of scientific project lies on the students
and it should be his / her own work.
The students should not depend on the supervisor to actively solve their problems.
The students should develop initiatives in completing the scientific project; it should
contain the ideas of the students with guidance from the supervisor.
7
Chapter 2: Scientific Project Management
The students are expected to behave with maturity in respect to their supervisor, the
lab staff, their peers and the scientific project.
The students should be courteous to their supervisor, accept direction, complete the
works as required and be punctual for the meetings.
If the student has any query or problem with her/his project that cannot be resolved
by the supervisor, the student can discuss this with the Scientific Project Coordinator.
It is the student responsibility to contact their supervisor to set up a meeting and
discuss their progress. Please plan the meetings in advance as the supervisor has other
responsibilities and may not be in position to meet the students at any time.
The students should NOT plagiarise their research writing.
The students should keep two (2) log books that show their work progress.
One of it is for their own use and contains working notes, measurements, notes, lab
work notes.
The second logbook will be the formal log book which will be distributed to all
students at the start of the session (refer Appendix B).
Student must be careful to safeguard their records, keeping copies of vital papers or
results. This includes doing sufficient softcopy backup for all computer media or
reports that are needed for the assessment.
All progress made or discussion with the supervisor must be recorded/documented
and maintained in the formal log book. This covers summary of discussions, design
work, theoretical work, experimental results and conclusion.
This log book will be inspected from time to time by project supervisor and
moderating examiner for evidence of satisfactory progress.
Constant review from supervisors will ensure that students execute their projects
according to the school’s procedure and standard. A complete log book should be
submitted concurrently with the hard binding thesis.
2.8 SUBMISSION
There are two (2) submission deadlines that the student has to meet. Each student has
to submit two (2) copies to the Faculty of Science and Natural Resources (FSSA Main
Office). These copies will be used for the assessment.
o The first submission is in week 13th of 1st semester for written proposal.
o The second submission is in week 13th of 2nd semester for the full scientific
project report.
Any late submission the student will be penalized accordingly.
8
Chapter 2: Scientific Project Management
For full scientific project report, the student will have 2 weeks to do all the correction
once the project have been accessed and returned to them. The hard cover can only be
preceded after all amendments and suggestions have been done and have been
approved by their supervisor.
After getting the examiner and supervisor signature in the Project Submission Form,
then the student will bind final report and the hardcover will be sent to Bilik Sumber
FSSA for record. The form will be collected for the Dean to sign.
Failure to submit the three (3) copies of hardcover thesis including one (1) softcopy in
CD (for supervisor) to the faculty may result in his/her graduation will be put on hold.
IMPORTANT DATES
NO. MATTERS SCIENTIFIC SCIENTIFIC ACTION
PROJECT 1 PROJECT 2
Student acquires scientific research Previous
1 - Student
title from supervisor Semester
Scientific Project
Collecting and distributing of Coordinator,
8 Week 13
project reports supervisor, examiner
(FSSA main office)
Presentation Student, Scientific
9 Proposal (Project 1) Week 14 Project Coordinator,
Viva-voce (Project 2) Examiner
Correction & submission of three (3)
Student
10 copies of final report including 1 - Week 14 - 18
(Bilik Sumber FSSA)
softcopy in CD
Checklist and declaration of
Student, Scientific
11 submission of final report form– - Week 18
Project Coordinator
FYP06
9
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
TYPE OF RESEARCH
PROJECTS 3
3.1 INTRODUCTION
At the beginning of developing a research project, you will have to decide on the type of
research that you would like to conduct. There are several types of undergraduate research
projects, for examples laboratory works, field study, desktop study and data analysis. The
type of research that you select will depend on your research question.
Primary research is any type of research that student investigate by collecting new data from
the field or the laboratory. The methods vary on how student run an experiment or study, but
it typically follows the scientific method. Conducting primary research is a useful skill to
acquire as it can greatly supplement scientific research in secondary sources, such as journals
or books.
Local field research is a collection of primary data by conducting fieldwork outside of the
classroom, laboratory, library or workplace setting. Field research involves a range of
methods: recording direct observations, collecting samples, distributing surveys or
conducting interviews. In the environmental science, field research refers to field
experiments utilizing in situ instruments and sampling samples. The quality of results
obtained from field research depends on the data gathered in the field.
10
Chapter 3: Type of Research Projects
The field of Environmental Science Program is a science based research area that addresses
the interface of environmental science and human activity using a broad range of disciplines.
Most of the projects offered through this program can be categorized into several research
fields:
Assessing the concentration and toxicity of dissolved metals of acid mine drainage
downstream of Mamut Copper Mine, Ranau, Sabah.
The potential of Pistia stratiotes in removing heavy metals from simulated wastewater.
Study on temporal and spatial variations of nitrogen dioxides, ozone and carbon
monoxide in Kota Kinabalu City.
Distribution, source and enrichment of selected heavy metals in sediments and waters
along the coastal area of Papar - Tuaran, Sabah.
Parameters affecting the adsorption of Cu (II) from aqueous solution by rice husk in
batch adsorption system.
Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in water and sediments from coastal area of
Papar, Sabah.
Heavy metal determination in tea and its removal utilizing cattails, Typha spp.
Investigate the presence of pesticide in fishes in Kinabatangan River.
11
Chapter 3: Type of Research Projects
12
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
LITERATURE
RESEARCH 4
4.1 UNDERSTANDING THE TERMINOLOGY LITERATURE
The common mass read whatever they want; this could range from daily newspapers to
romantic novel. These reading materials are often entertaining as they do not require serious
focusing and mental analysis. However, a scholar read what he or she needs to. Of course,
doing what you want and what you need is a totally different feeling altogether, now add in
the focusing and understanding factors to be incorporated in the reading process, life just got
tougher, isn’t it?
Towards graduation, it is a common requirement that a final year student needs to perform a
research project and write a dissertation or thesis about it. Majority of students faced
problem even at the very initial stage just because they failed to acknowledge their role as a
researcher. A student reads mostly text books but a researcher reads mostly journals. A text
book is a literature on mostly established theory while a journal is a literature on new
developments in research. Both of these literatures had gone through scientific review
process where the facts had been verified by qualified academician in the particular niche of
knowledge.
In scientific research, it is best to avoid referring to literature that its content validity is
questionable. Examples are website which its author cannot be identified as well as book and
journal published by predatory publishers.
The purposes of performing a good intensive literature search are (i) to establish thorough
related database and (ii) to identify data gap on the subject of interest.
13
Chapter 4: Literature Research
particular person is lack of basic knowledge in that subject of interest. In such case, it will be
more beneficial to read up text books and enhance the basic knowledge first before jumping
into research based literature search.
Just like anything we do in research, literature search requires planning and strategy. To aid
the literature search planning and strategy, questions can be listed and grouped in categories
so that keywords can be identified along the process. These keywords are very important as
journal content are tagged based on them. Thus, identifying the wrong keywords will not get
you the correct literature that you need.
Classified and sensitive information related to national security will never be published in
journal due to restriction posed by the governing body. Thus, if one is looking at topic like
uranium deposit in a particular area, perhaps the best place to start the search is at the
Mineral and Geoscience Department or consultant report (if any). Such departmental report
will normally require letter from the faculty stating your intention of research before the said
department allows one to access such document.
Impact factor journal is a good source if one is searching for (i) thorough yet established
research methodology, (ii) variety of valid data presentation technique and (iii) work with
novelty value. Another two categories of journals are indexed and non-indexed journal.
Although it may not be necessarily true, it is a common belief that the quality of the journal
increased from non-indexed to indexed and peaked at higher impact factor journal.
Therefore, if the subject of interest is of novel value, one should start the research based
literature search in impact factor journal. Journal can be easily searched utilising
ScienceDirect and Scopus which are available at http://www.sciencedirect.com and
http://www.scopus.com, respectively. It is however risky to refer to journal published by
predatory publishers.
At times, on-going research, due to their incomplete nature, is available in the form of
proceeding. One needs to understand that data of on-going research is presented in
conference and documented in the form of proceeding for information sharing and
discussion. While it is unfair to say the quality of literature in a proceeding is low, one need to
understand that its level of review process is somehow lenient. Researcher do not normally
refers to proceeding as to avoid the question on validity.
14
Chapter 4: Literature Research
A single keyword search in ScienceDirect can lead you to thousands of matching journal
articles. For example, the key word adsorption will lead you to 578,605 matching journal
articles (Figure 4.1). You have two options to proceed: (i) to manually go through one by one
of these journals and pick out the one that you need, or (ii) to zoom in your search by adding
another keyword (Figure 4.2).
15
Chapter 4: Literature Research
The advantage of option (ii) is that it is very convenient and fast. Of course if one feels that
108,900 matching journal articles are still too pain staking to process, one can add in more
keywords to narrow down the number of matching. However, there is a catch with option (ii)
because at times due to technical error in tagging of the keyword, articles that you are
supposed to look for are not found in the matching list. For this reason, it is advisable to stick
to option (i). In such, it means that research based literature search cannot be done last
minute. One will also need to understand that number and sequence of the keyword matching
list change from time to time whenever newer articles are available.
Since there are thousands of matching articles to read and process, it is very unlikely for a
researcher to read all of these at one go or within a week or two. Therefore, perhaps the best
strategy one can do is to create folders to organise these found articles and read them later
when one is doing the literature review process (Figure 4.3).
16
Chapter 4: Literature Research
Whatever one does during the literature search, just remember one thing that one must not
be desperate but take control of time and plan the strategy ahead. In other words, one need to
visualise the research based literature search outcome before swinging into action.
17
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
RESEARCH PROPOSAL
5
5.1 WHAT IS A RESEARCH PROPOSAL?
A good research proposal helps to put your ideas into objective, clear and focused statements,
so that you will be able to know your scopes of research, your motivation, your research
objectives and the methodology to achieve that, and finally your hypothesis (which are
tentative and provisional statement(s) that you believe you are going to find out in your
research).
It is both thinking and writing process. When preparing a research proposal, you will have the
opportunity to think about many issues related, besides outlining your research
designs/approach and methods, location, the proposal would also require you to demonstrate
a level of knowledge of the literature in the relevant fields and also the up-to-date
information on the topic.
Research proposal is usually considered as a short “action plan” for your proposed piece of
the research project. It also serves as a provisional agreement between you and your
supervisor, something that you have made a commitment to accomplish within the next 2
semesters. A time table (Gantt chart) is included in a proposal to help you plan ahead by
thinking about the different stages of your research, so that you can weed out unrealistic
research objectives.
Usually a research proposal will become your chapter 1 (introduction) in your scientific
project. However, research proposal is not the same as the proposal report for scientific
Project 1.
The keywords to remember when writing a research proposal are as follows: clear, short and
focused, you should have the intention also to convince your readers or any members of the
scientific community about the need of your research project. Just like a story book, the first
chapter should attempt to draw others into your research by putting your words
“scientifically intriguing”.
18
Chapter 5: Research Proposal
There is no definite answer to this. Just as a guide, and not a rule, the following is the
benchmark for a scientific project research proposal:
This should provide a specific summary of the proposed work and no over-claim.
Example:
19
Chapter 5: Research Proposal
4. YES
A study of soil microbial diversity changes following logging in north-eastern Sabah
A “scientifically-intriguing” introduction work best to hook your readers and set the context
of your proposed research project. Capture your readers’ attention if possible in the first two-
three sentences. This is the opportunity to show that your research has not been done before
and the findings will add something new and significant to the existing body of knowledge.
A brief description of the field in which the study is to be on: the brief background provided
for the research should provide an adequate context for the study to help the readers
understand the questions and objectives. The selective literature will show the readers that
you have a good knowledge of what is happening.
Suggested format:
The literature review section is to summarize in brief what the literature has to say about the
research topic/questions that you are undertaking. It would be good to summarize key
research findings and/or important theories in the field; appropriate references help to set
the research in a context and show that you have done some relevant and selective reading in
your intended area of research.
20
Chapter 5: Research Proposal
A further description of the research problem could also be carried out; this could arise from
a gap or conflict in previous or recent researches or be an extension/continuity of what
others have done. It could also arise from a puzzling issue or new methods in the recent
development in the relevant field.
How many objectives should there be in a scientific project? The answer lies in achievability
and not the number of it, sometimes the number of objectives will change based on the
findings of your research.
Setting the number of objectives depend on what is your research question(s) in the first
place. Objectives are set to answer just that. It could be written in the form of research
questions (e.g. what impact does…), hypothesis or purposeful sentences (e.g. this study aims
to investigate…)
Some authors suggested that research objectives should be SMART (Specific, Measurable,
Achievable, Realistic and Time-bound), as this would help you to break down your objectives
to stages and set the scope. SMART is a good guide in setting reasonable and feasible
objectives.
The student-learning-time (SLT) for a scientific project depends on the credit hours allocated.
Based on Malaysia Qualification Framework (MQF), 40 active learning hours are associated
with each credit, thus for 3 credit hours scientific Project 1, a student should be spending
approximately 120 hours a semester on it. Too much time spent just on scientific project will
jeopardize a student’s performance in other subjects, thus one must manage his/her time
wisely to learn. The SLT for scientific Project 2 is 240 hours for a semester (6 credit hours).
Justification is the need of the research. Your literature review will have already helped to
lead the reader to an understanding of why your topic is of importance. This is where you will
explicitly state how your proposed research will advance the existing body of knowledge.
What are all the positive effects? Will your study ultimately change understanding or
practices or policies?
21
Chapter 5: Research Proposal
This section derived from your research objectives and the methods used must help you to
achieve your objectives. They have to be logically arranged and it should cover your
experimental design, data collection, quality control and data analysis.
Expected results are the outcome of the research, what would expect to find at the end of the
project.
Developing a time table / Gantt chart (Figure 5.1) that indicates the sequence of research
phases/stages and the time that you might need for each phases will help in planning your
plan and focus also. Though estimation, you still need to carefully assign the activities and
time span, so that the Gantt chart will not be just a display.
2015 2016
Research activities Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Literature Review
Fieldwork
Laboratory Analysis
Data interpretation
Report writing
Viva
Figure 5.1 Example of Gantt chart for scientific Project 1 & 2 planning
22
Chapter 5: Research Proposal
1. http://www.ait.ac.th/education/LanguageCenter/ait-writing-services/guide-book
2. http://www.writingcenter.uconn.edu/pdf/Research_Proposal_Writing.pdf
3. http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/ (top rated)
4. http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/
23
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
6
SAMPLING DESIGN IN
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH
6.1 WHAT IS SAMPLING?
Sampling refers to the way that data collection is done. There are many techniques of doing
sampling. However, understanding the data set is required before doing sampling.
Data are VALUE (measurements or observations) that the variable can assume. A collection of
data values forms a DATA SET.
24
Chapter 6: Sampling Design in Environmental Research
Example
Univariate Data Bivariate Data Multivariate Data
Example:
Example:
25
Chapter 6: Sampling Design in Environmental Research
Example:
Example:
There are three (3) main principles of experimental design to help researcher to conclude
that differences in the results of an experiment are not reasonably attributable to chance, but
are likely caused by the treatment.
1. Control: Some method should be used to control for effects due to factors other than the
ones of primary interest.
26
Chapter 6: Sampling Design in Environmental Research
Replicate for taking sample is how many samples will be taken from one point or
station of sampling.
27
Chapter 6: Sampling Design in Environmental Research
Sampling design is really important and must be suitable to the hypothesis of problem
statement that needs to be solved. From the design, researcher can identify:
Example A:
Media Sampling Parameter Location Station Replicate N
Monthly in a Each
Zn, Cu, Pb River A, B, C 12 x 3 x 3 x
Water year (12 location 5 3
(3) (3) 5 x 3 = 1620
times) stations
Expected Results:
Sampling River Station Parameter Data Replicates
ZnA11
Zn ZnA12
ZnA13
CuA11
January A 1 Cu CuA12
CuA13
PbA11
Pb PbA12
PbA13
28
Chapter 6: Sampling Design in Environmental Research
Example B:
Media Sampling Parameter Location Station Replicate N
Morning
(6am-12pm)
0 5x3x3x
Afternoon
1 day (because 4 x 0 = 180
(12pm-6pm)
(24 hour) use
Zn, Cu, Pb A, B, C Evening
Air cumulative Each
(3) (3) (6pm- 12am)
5 days data by interval
Midnight
hours has 45
(12am-6am)
interval) data
(4 times interval)
Example C:
Media Sampling Parameter Location Station Replicate N
Surface 2 1x3x3x5
sediment x 2 = 90
(5 station)
Zn, Cu, Pb A, B, C
Sediment 1 times
(3) (3)
Corer 50 cm cut 1x3x3x0
each 5cm x 10 = 90
(10)
Example D:
Media Sampling Parameter Location Station Replicate N
Zn, Cu, Pb A, B, C 2 x 3 x 3 x 0 x 15 =
Biota 2 species 0 15
(3) (3) 540
Example E:
Media Sampling Parameter Location Station Replicate N
There were 8
characteristics
Choose score 3 times
8 selected selected to 8x8x0x1
Report 0 1 to 5 reading
reports compare each x 3 = 192
(1) the report
reports
(8)
29
Chapter 6: Sampling Design in Environmental Research
Example F:
Media Sampling Parameter Location Station Replicate N
Water quality Surface
parameters (depth 0 m- 1x1x3x3x
(Example: DO, 0.5 m) 3 = 27
Lake °C, BOD, A, B, C Middle
1 time 3
water nitrate, (3) (depth 1 m (if you choose
ammonia, oil -1.5 m) 3 parameters,
& grease etc.) Bottom so 27x3 =81)
(1) (3)
Example G: Combination
Media Sampling Parameter Location Station Replicate N
2 species By transect Number of
live at or quadrate individuals 2x3x3x3
Biota (3 point each
surface River biota in = 54
sediment Zn, Cu, Pb location. quadrate
A, B, C
(3) Example:
(3)
upstream,
Surface 1x3x3x2
Sediment middle & 3
sediment x 3 = 54
downstream
*For more examples, please refer to journal that related to your fields of interest.
The sampling design can help the researcher to manage the time, method, technique and how
many sample that is appropriate to solve the problem statement.
30
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
QUESTIONNAIRE
7
7.1 DESIGNING A QUESTIONNAIRE
Usually, questionnaires are used in a survey which requires the students to collect
information from organizations or people for their research. Questionnaires should be well
designed to achieve the same types of information which are collected from a large number of
people. Hence, the data can also be analyzed quantitatively and systematically. It is important
to design a suitable questionnaire to ensure that you get valid responses to the questions
asked. The objectives in designing a questionnaire are as below:
1. Maximize the proportion of subjects answering the questionnaire (the response rate)
2. Obtain accurate and relevant information
The first objective is to establish a connection with the subjects, explain the purpose of the
survey and also as a reminder to those who have not responded. For the second objective, the
way we ask questions to the subjects is important which compromises what to ask, how to
ask, the order of the questions and the general layout of the questionnaire.
Early Planning
A timeline for the research, preparation of question and preliminary survey is suggested
to recognize any possible problems with the questionnaires before the interview.
Give Instruction
Explain the objective of the survey and provide extra help that the respondent will need
for the completion of the questionnaire.
31
Chapter 7: Questionnaire
Length of Questionnaire
Generally, the shorter and simpler the questionnaires (1-2 pages), the better and higher
the response rates.
a) Questions to be Asked
b) Types of Questions
Closed Format: Respondents are only required to select the answer from the given
options.
32
Chapter 7: Questionnaire
The responses must also be balanced (for every Very Satisfied, have a Very
Unsatisfied). For example is rate the effectiveness of the recent school recycling
education program on a scale of 1 to 5.
Open Format: It is based on the respondents own answers where their answers
provide specific comments or feedback.
33
Chapter 7: Questionnaire
The casual approach: “By the way, have you ever happened to litter, maybe when no
one was looking?” should be used as a last part of another decoy question.
The numbered card approach: “Please pick one or more of the following items which
correspond to how you view littering.” In the list of choices, include: “I occasionally
litter”
The everybody approach: “As we all know, some people litter when they have no
choice. Are you one of them?”
The other people approach: A scenario is given to the participants, “John occasionally
tosses small pieces of litter out his car window.” They were then asked, “Do you feel
John is wrong? What penalty should be imposed for John? Have you done this in the
past? Would you ever consider doing the above?”
d) Arrangement of Questions
It is important to arrange the questions to get the most information out of the participant.
Some general rules are:
34
Chapter 7: Questionnaire
There are a number of ways of managing questionnaires. Example is they may be completed
independently (self-administered) which may be sent by post, email or electronically online,
or read out loud in the form of interview which may be completed over the telephone or in
face-to-face interviews.
The choice of method of administration depends on who the respondent are. For example,
older people may be suitably surveyed by interviews and university lecturers by email.
It is impossible to get the questionnaire right for the first round even for the experts. The
questionnaires should be conducted on a small sample of people characteristic of those in the
survey population. Each pilot respondent are asked with questions regarding the survey
design: effects of different wordings, their opinion on the answer they gave, their
understanding on a particular word, length and appropriateness of questions, etc. The
questionnaire can be improved by polishing the question order, wording and layout.
A personalized cover letter or an introductory statement is a good idea to start with where
the purpose of the survey can be explained, the importance of the respondent’s participation,
the person in charge of the survey, and a statement guaranteeing confidentiality.
Lots of students have difficulties talking to strangers when conducting an interview surveys
and questionnaires. A good way to start the conversation with a stranger is as follow:
35
Chapter 7: Questionnaire
(name)
“Hello. My name is ________________ (school/institute) I’m working
and I am a student from _______________________.
on a research project looking at_________________________________
(title of research project) for a college-credit class called
“The Global Environment.” I found your phone number/email address on the internet and I
was wondering if you have a few minutes to answer some questions regarding with my
research.”
In order to yield valid information, the questionnaires must be designed carefully. Every
question must be relevant, appropriate, intelligible, precise and unbiased with the objective of
the research. The questions must also be in the right order and the layout must be clear.
Drafting is recommended for a clear personalized cover letter. A trail for the questionnaire
must be made before the actual survey.
The important things to be included in a cover letter are the name of institute/school, title of
research project, the name of researcher, objective of the research, the selection of
respondents, the confidentiality of the respondents identification and personal opinion and
finally a word of appreciation for the respondents’ participation in your questionnaire.
36
Chapter 7: Questionnaire
Color coding
Due to the several types of respondents within a single survey (for example wholesalers
and retailers), color coding makes it easier to manage the questionnaire.
Interviewer instructions
Instruction should be provided alongside the questions to make it easier for the
interviewers to complete the questionnaire.
a) Open-ended question
Advantage
- Respondent are free to provide their own answer.
- A variety of a possible answer can be obtained.
Disadvantage
- Difficult to analyze data.
37
Chapter 7: Questionnaire
b) Fixed response
Advantage
- Analyzing data is easier.
- Respondents do not have to answer in detail.
- Time spent to answer is short.
- Higher respond rate.
Disadvantage
- Limited answer.
- Respondent does not answer the question seriously.
a) Force Choice
Type of questionnaire where respondents have to choose a response that shows definitive
options.
Example:
Do you understand by the concept of sustainable environment?
( ) Yes
( ) No
Example:
Rate the current environmental policy by United Nations on each of the following:
Decisive ___: ___: ___: ___: ___: ___: ___: Indecisive
Active ___: ___: ___: ___: ___: ___: ___: Passive
c) Likert Scale
Psychometric response scale used in questionnaire to get the series of preferences from
respondents. It measures the degree of opinion and converts an ordinal scale to
quantitative data.
38
Chapter 7: Questionnaire
Example:
Indicate your level of agreement on the role of individual in river pollution?
( ) Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree
( ) Uncertain
( ) Agree
( ) Most agree
A model which provides data needed of the full research study but on a smaller scale. It works
as a trail before the actual questionnaire is distributed to identify and improve errors in
selected questions. It requires at least 30 questionnaires to be tested and all the
questionnaires are analyzed and improve before it is included in the final questionnaire.
Be professional
The questionnaire must always be proofread where it is assured to be relevant to the
topic. This helps to create a good image about you.
39
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
8
SECONDARY DATA
SOURCES FOR RESEARCH
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Data collection is the most important process in a study. This is because the collection of
accurate data, data analysis and processing are needed to answer the research questions or
objectives in a study. The data we collected or observed should correspond to the purpose of
the study. There are two types of data that can be used in a study, namely primary and
secondary data.
With the availability of secondary data, it can help students or researchers to manipulate
them to achieve different objectives. In addition, it can be used as a reference point or as
comparison to the present study.
Primary data are data collected by the researcher himself/herself for a specific purpose,
for example data collected by a research students in his/her final year research project.
Secondary data are data collected by someone else for some other purposes, but being
used by the researcher for another purpose.
The answer is no. There are some advantages and disadvantages in using primary and
secondary data. Quality is not the issue. However in primary data collection, the researcher
himself/herself will be able to determine the quality of it, whereas in using secondary data,
one can only hope that the data are in good quality.
40
Chapter 8: Secondary Data Sources for Research
Whatever data a researcher has obtained first hand by himself/herself are NOT secondary
data and they are considered as primary data. Examples of primary data sources are:
Direct observation
In situ readings
Questionnaires and surveys
Interviews
Laboratory experiments
Official Statistics: Official statistics are statistics collected by governments and this
information is readily available in the annual statistic reports. For example the
Department of Statistics Malaysia would have census and surveys for various activities
and even on the environment. The Department of Environment also produces annual
report on the quality of the environment on their website.
Scientific journals are a good source of secondary information as they usually undergo
peer review and they are first hand reports of original findings.
Review articles are assembles and summaries of the related publications on a specific
topic. Reviews are usually written by experts in the relevant field. The review article will
attempt to give any overview of the latest development and list all the relevant
publication from which the information is derived.
41
Chapter 8: Secondary Data Sources for Research
Quality control is the key that able to judge the quality of such data. Questions to ask:
Is the source reliable?
Does if include a method section and is the method sound?
When is the source published, is it consistent with the information reported
(Sometimes a year 2011 data can exist in a 2008 report)? Is it up-to-date?
Is it a primary or secondary data?
Is it well referenced?
Does it make sense?
Most of the time, secondary data (as in Literature Review) are used to help us have a
better understanding of the topic that we are researching.
It can also be valuable in generating hypothesis and identifying the areas of interests.
It helps to plan for primary data collection to ensure that the data collected are
comparable with the secondary data.
The analysis of secondary data will also help in identifying the possible root of a problem.
More readily available (can be obtained from public sources) - the secondary data readily
available either online or manually. Some departments or agencies periodically upload
data unto their department's websites
Cost-saving / It is less expensive.
Provide basic idea in designing the new study.
Serve as starting point in preparing the formation of the research problem, research
hypothesis or research methods.
Reliability of data collected by government and commercial research institutions is
probably higher
Time-saving. The study does not need to start or collect any information that was known.
Help decide whether a research should be done.
Help shape the various hypotheses.
There is no hassles for data collection
It is not time consuming
It may allow the researcher to cover a wider spatial or temporal range
42
Chapter 8: Secondary Data Sources for Research
Information may be outdated or obsolete. This is because the old data will often cause
dispute if it becomes the primary data in a research.
Concept definition may differ from other studies. Data acquired in the past is to answer
the question at that particular period of time, and it may not be able to answer the
objectives in the current study.
Units of measurement may differ.
Difficult to ascertain the previous research design.
The data may be incomplete and inaccurate (Some researches may be bias during data
collection).
Perhaps there is a conversion of data, thus the secondary data do not follow the format
required by the researchers.
The researcher cannot decide what is collected
One can only hope that the data is of good quality
Incompatibilities
Limited access
Usually researchers will use data observed in the field as control or benchmarking to
maintain and ensure the quality of the secondary data.
43
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
STATISTICS FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL 9
RESEARCH
9.1 INTRODUCTION
Normal Distribution- The normal distribution is a descriptive model that describes the
distribution of a set of data to represent the situations or phenomena or an experiment. A
normal distribution curve is bell shape. The shape and position of normal distribution
curve depend on two parameters, the mean and standard deviation. The larger the
standard deviation, the more dispersed or spread out, the distribution is. So, normal
distribution is important to identify the distributions of a set of data before analyzing it
further with statistical calculations.
The bell shape normal distribution graph covered 100% or probability-1 of total area
under the graph. The area is important to find the percentage or probability of significant
for decision making for hypothesis of situation or phenomena or experiment to be solved.
Normal Distribution Table (can find it from any statistical text book) is used as a
reference to find the critical value of alpha (α).
44
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Distinguishing Features
The P-value method or probability value is the probability of getting a sample statistic
(such as the mean) or a more extreme sample statistic in the direction of the alternative
hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true.
45
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
The null hypothesis, (H0) is a statistical hypothesis that states that there is no difference
between a parameter and a specific value, or that there is no difference between two
parameters.
The alternative hypothesis, (Ha) is a statistical hypothesis that states the existence of a
difference between a parameter and a specific value, or states that there is a difference
between two parameters.
Example:
Title: Measured pollutant-Lead (Pb) inside fish tissue and water from FSSA Lake.
When the null hypothesis is rejected at a specific significance level, it can be concluded that
the difference is probably not due to chance and thus is statistically significant. However,
the results may not have any practical significance.
It is up to the student / researcher to use common sense when interpreting the results of a
statistical test.
46
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
9.3 STATISTICS
Statistics is a branch of mathematics that has applications in almost every facet of our daily
life. The field of statistics is composed of both theory and methods that govern its application.
In this text, it shall look on statistics as a methodological tool in analyzing numerical data to
make better decision.
Statistics
Numerical Tables
Sampling River Station Parameter Data Replicates (ppm)
12.0
Zn 11.5
13.2
10.0
January A 1 Cu 12.6
13.0
0.5
Pb 0.8
0.9
47
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Line Graph
Inferential statistics is the branch of statistics that deals with problem. Also, consists of
procedures used to make inferences about population characteristics from information
contained. It consists of generalizing from samples to populations, performing estimations
and hypothesis tests, determining relationships among variables, and making predictions.
The inferential statistics involves determining whether a relationship between two or more
numerical or quantitative variables exists.
9.4.1 Range
The data set obtained by observing the values of a variable for an entire population is called
population data. A data set obtained by observing the values of a variable for a sample of the
population is called sample data. The data set from observation has a smallest and largest
numbers or minimum and maximum values. The difference of minimum and maximum is
called range.
9.4.2 Mean
The most commonly used measure of center is the mean. When people speak of taking an
average, it is the mean that they are most often referring to. The mean of a data set is the sum
of the observations divided by the number of observation. Researcher used mean as a
number to represent a set of data that used in an experiment had been done.
48
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Mean, X
X
x1 x 2 x3 ......xi
N N
Where,
X = measured value of item
N = size of sample
9.4.3 Variance
Variance is the average of the squares of the distance each value is from the mean. Variance is
to find how far all observation is from the mean, the total deviation from the mean. The
symbol sample variance (S2) and population variance (σ2).
2
N N
x x x x
2 2 2 2
x x .... xi x
S 2
1 2
n 1 n 1
In contrast to the range, the standard deviation takes into account all of the observations. To
describe that quantitatively, we use a descriptive measure that indicates the amount of
variation or spread in a data set. Such descriptive measures are referred to as measures of
variation or measures of spread. The standard deviation measures variation by indicating
how far, on average, the observation are from the mean. For a data set with a large amount of
variation, the observations will, on the average, be far from the mean; hence the standard
deviation will be large. For a data set with a small amount of variation, the observations will,
on the average, be close to the mean; consequently, the standard deviation will be small. So,
standard deviation is to find how far each observation is from the mean, the deviation from
the mean.
To compute the standard deviation of a data set, we need to know whether it is population
data or sample data. This information is necessary because the formulas for standard
deviations of sample data and population data differ slightly. The symbol sample data (s) and
population data (σ).
x x1 2 x 2 2 ....xi 2
2
N N
49
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
x x x x
2 2 2 2
x x .... xi x
S 1 2
n 1 n 1
Until this point, all the inferential statistics we have considered involve using one sample as
the basis for drawing conclusion about one population. Although these single sample
techniques are used occasionally in real research, most research studies aim to compare of
two (or more) sets of data in order to make inferences about the differences between two (or
more) populations.
9.5.1 Student T-Test for Two Population Mean (used table t-distribution)
ASSUMPTIONS
1. Independent samples
2. Normal populations or large samples
3. Equal population standard deviations
Step 1: The null hypothesis is Ho: µ1 = µ2 and the alternative hypothesis is one of the
following:
± t α/2 or -t α or tα
(Two-tailed) (Left-tailed) (Right-tailed)
With df = n1 + n2 - 2. Use Normal Distribution Table to find the critical value(s)
50
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Where
Step 5: If the value of the test statistic falls in the rejection region, reject H0: otherwise, do
not reject H0.
The hypothesis test is exact for normal populations and is approximately correct for large
samples from non-normal populations.
9.5.2 Paired T-Test for Two Population Mean (used table t-distribution)
Example Pair: Before & after or to test the efficiency of thing in one experiment.
ASSUMPTIONS
1. Paired samples
2. Normal differences or large samples
Step 1: The null hypothesis is Ho: µ1 = µ2 and the alternative hypothesis is one of the
following:
± t α/2 or -t α or tα
(Two-tailed) (Left-tailed) (Right-tailed)
With df = n - 1. Use Normal Distribution Table to find the critical value(s)
51
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Where
D D
t
sD n
with d.f. = n -1 and where
D n D 2 D 2
D and sD
n n n 1
Step 6: If the value of the test statistic falls in the rejection region, reject H0: otherwise, do
not reject H0.
52
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
9.6 CORRELATION
The correlation coefficient (r) computed from the sample data measures the strength
and direction of a linear relationship between two variables.
n xy x y
r
n
x x n y y
2 2
2 2
*The t-test is used to support the r, where it is significant at which level either 0.05 or
0.01 or not significant at all. Only the value of r with significant level will accepted, Ha.
Hypothesis testing
n2
tr
1 r2
53
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Step Procedure:
9.7 REGRESSION
Regression is a statistical method used to describe the nature of the relationship between
variables—that is, positive or negative, linear or nonlinear. If the value of the correlation
coefficient is significant, the next step is to determine the equation of the regression line
which is the data’s line of best fit. Best fit means that the sum of the squares of the vertical
distance from each point to the line is at a minimum.
a
y x x xy
2
n x x
2 2
n xy x y
b
n x x
2 2
where
a = y intercept
b = the slope of the line.
54
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
*The f-test is used to support the R, where it is significant at which level either 0.05 or
0.01 or not significant at all. Only the value of R with significant level will accepted, Ha.
R2 k
F
1 R2 n k 1
where
n = the number of data groups
k = the number of independent variables
d.f.N. = n – k
d.f.D. = n – k – 1
Step Procedure:
b) Objective
55
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
d) Results
e) Normal Distribution
Zn Cu
Kurtosis 0.4697 -0.8919
56
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Number of Zn (ppm)
Species
individuals Sampling 1 x- x (x- x )2 Sampling 2 x- x (x- x )2
1 4.9390 1.0441 1.0901 6.6630 3.1227 9.7513
2 2.1250 -1.7699 3.1325 3.8130 0.2727 0.0744
3 3.1300 -0.7649 0.5851 1.5490 -1.9913 3.9653
4 3.6480 -0.2469 0.0610 1.8870 -1.6533 2.7334
5 4.3060 0.4111 0.1690 1.3460 -2.1943 4.8150
6 2.6870 -1.2079 1.4590 3.3480 -0.1923 0.0370
7 3.4260 -0.4689 0.2199 6.5630 3.0227 9.1367
Mollusk 8 3.9460 0.0511 0.0026 4.0690 0.5287 0.2795
9 5.2290 1.3341 1.7798 7.9040 4.3637 19.0419
10 5.0000 1.1051 1.2212 2.6300 -0.9103 0.8286
11 4.4160 0.5211 0.2715 1.0050 -2.5353 6.4277
12 3.0960 -0.7989 0.6382 3.0580 -0.4823 0.2326
13 5.2240 1.3291 1.7665 3.1680 -0.3723 0.1386
14 2.8800 -1.0149 1.0300 1.8860 -1.6543 2.7367
15 4.3710 0.4761 0.2267 4.2160 0.6757 0.4566
Sum of X 58.4230 13.6533 53.1050 60.6552
N 15 15
Minimum
2.1250 1.0050
Data
Maximum
5.2290 7.9040
Data
Standard deviation S = √ S2
Sampling 1= (0.9752)1/2 = 0.9875 Sampling 2= (4.3325)1/2= 2.0814
57
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Number of Cu (ppm)
Species
individuals Sampling 1 x- x (x- x )2 Sampling 2 x- x (x- x )2
1 0.2640 0.1679 0.0282 0.1380 0.0431 0.0019
2 0.0470 -0.0491 0.0024 0.1300 0.0351 0.0012
3 0.0460 -0.0501 0.0025 0.1200 0.0251 0.0006
4 0.0330 -0.0631 0.0040 0.1480 0.0531 0.0028
5 0.0230 -0.0731 0.0053 0.1930 0.0981 0.0096
6 0.2110 0.1149 0.0132 0.0560 -0.0389 0.0015
7 0.0490 -0.0471 0.0022 0.0810 -0.0139 0.0002
Mollusk 8 0.1330 0.0369 0.0014 0.1890 0.0941 0.0089
9 0.1903 0.0942 0.0089 0.0340 -0.0609 0.0037
10 0.0520 -0.0441 0.0019 0.1690 0.0741 0.0055
11 0.1500 0.0539 0.0029 0.0420 -0.0529 0.0028
12 0.1360 0.0399 0.0016 0.1340 0.0391 0.0015
13 0.0530 -0.0431 0.0019 0.0600 -0.0349 0.0012
14 0.1940 0.0979 0.0096 0.0610 -0.0339 0.0011
15 0.1630 0.0669 0.0045 0.0690 -0.0259 0.0007
Sum of X 1.7443 0.0905 1.6240 0.0433
N 15 15
Minimum
0.0230 0.0340
Data
Maximum
0.2640 0.1930
Data
Standard deviation S = √ S2
Sampling 1 = (0.0065)1/2 = 0.0803 Sampling 2 = (0.0031)1/2 = 0.0556
58
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
h) Comparison of Two Means (always refer back to your data collection & design)
Step 1: Hypothesis
Ho: There is no significant different Zn concentration in mollusc between sampling 1
and 2.
Ha: There is significant different Zn concentration in mollusc between sampling 1 and
2.
Zn
Sampling 1 Sampling 2
x 3.8949 3.5403
n 15 15
S2 0.9752 4.3325
15 10.9752 15 14.3325
15 15 2
13.6528 60.6550
28
2.65385 =1.6291
59
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
x1 x2
t
1 1
SP
n1 n2
3.8949 3.5403
t
1 1
1.6291
15 15
0.3546
t 1.6291
=9.4471
0.1333
Step 5: Critical value ttwo tailed=1.701 less than Test statistical value ttest =9.4471, falls in
rejection region. So, Reject Ho.
We use the same size individual of mollusk in sampling 1 and 2. Typically, paired T-Test is
used to check the efficiency before and after treatment. So, the same size of mollusk in this
case study will determine the efficiency of accumulation of Zn and Cu by mollusk in
specific size.
Step 1: Hypothesis
Ho: There is no significant different Zn concentration in mollusc (<5cm length)
between sampling 1 and 2.
Ha: There is significant different Zn concentration in mollusc (<5cm length) between
sampling 1 and 2.
60
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Number of Zn
individuals Sampling 1 (before) Sampling 2 (after) D D2
1 4.9390 6.6630 -1.7240 2.9722
2 2.1250 3.8130 -1.6880 2.8493
3 3.1300 1.5490 1.5810 2.4996
4 3.6480 1.8870 1.7610 3.1011
5 4.3060 1.3460 2.9600 8.7616
6 2.6870 3.3480 -0.6610 0.4369
7 3.4260 6.5630 -3.1370 9.8408
8 3.9460 4.0690 -0.1230 0.0151
9 5.2290 7.9040 -2.6750 7.1556
10 5.0000 2.6300 2.3700 5.6169
11 4.4160 1.0050 3.4110 11.6349
12 3.0960 3.0580 0.0380 0.0014
13 5.2240 3.1680 2.0560 4.2271
14 2.8800 1.8860 0.9940 0.9880
15 4.3710 4.2160 0.1550 0.0240
Sum of X 5.3180 60.1247
Mean, D
D
5.3180
= 0.3545
n 15
SD
n D 2 D 2
n(n 1)
D D 0.3545 0 0.3545
t = 1.0428
SD 1.3167 0.3400
n 15
Step 6: Critical value ttwo tailed=1.761 more than Test statistical value ttest =1.0428, falls in
non- rejection region. So, Do Not Reject Ho.
61
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
k) Relationship Analysis
Number of Zn Cu
Individuals x y xy x2 y2
1 4.9390 0.2640 1.3039 24.3937 0.0697
2 2.1250 0.0470 0.0999 4.5156 0.0022
3 3.1300 0.0460 0.1440 9.7969 0.0021
4 3.6480 0.0330 0.1204 13.3079 0.0011
5 4.3060 0.0230 0.0990 18.5416 0.0005
6 2.6870 0.2110 0.5670 7.2200 0.0445
7 3.4260 0.0490 0.1679 11.7375 0.0024
8 3.9460 0.1330 0.5248 15.5709 0.0177
9 5.2290 0.1903 0.9951 27.3424 0.0362
10 5.0000 0.0520 0.2600 25.0000 0.0027
11 4.4160 0.1500 0.6624 19.5011 0.0225
12 3.0960 0.1360 0.4211 9.5852 0.0185
13 5.2240 0.0530 0.2769 27.2902 0.0028
14 2.8800 0.1940 0.5587 8.2944 0.0376
15 4.3710 0.1630 0.7125 19.1056 0.0266
16 6.6630 0.1380 0.9195 44.3956 0.0190
17 3.8130 0.1300 0.4957 14.5390 0.0169
18 1.5490 0.1200 0.1859 2.3994 0.0144
19 1.8870 0.1480 0.2793 3.5608 0.0219
20 1.3460 0.1930 0.2598 1.8117 0.0372
21 3.3480 0.0560 0.1875 11.2091 0.0031
22 6.5630 0.0810 0.5316 43.0730 0.0066
23 4.0690 0.1890 0.7690 16.5568 0.0357
24 7.9040 0.0340 0.2687 62.4732 0.0012
25 2.6300 0.1690 0.4445 6.9169 0.0286
26 1.0050 0.0420 0.0422 1.0100 0.0018
27 3.0580 0.1340 0.4098 9.3514 0.0180
28 3.1680 0.0600 0.1901 10.0362 0.0036
29 1.8860 0.0610 0.1150 3.5570 0.0037
30 4.2160 0.0690 0.2909 17.7747 0.0048
Sum of Data 111.5280 3.3683 12.3029 489.8677 0.5036
62
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
Step 1: Hypothesis
H0: 0 (there is no correlation between the Zn and Cu in the population of mollusk)
Ha: 0 (there is a significant correlation between the Zn and Cu in the population of
mollusk)
Step 3: The Critical Value from T-Distribution table is ttwo tailed =1.701 (d.f = n-2 = 30-
2=28)
n xy x y
r
n x x n y y
2 2 2 2
3012.3029 111.52803.3683
r
30489.8677 111.5280 300.5036 3.3683
2 2
369.0867 375.6598
r
14696.0315 12438.494815.1084 11.3454
6.5731
r = -0.0713
8494.9250
n2 28 28
tr 0.0713 0.0713 = 0.7882
1 r2 1 0.0713
2
0.9949
Step 6: Critical value ttwo tailed=1.701 more than Test statistical value ttest =0.7882, falls in
non- rejection region. So, Do Not Reject Ho.
Step 7: There is no correlation relationship (r= -0.0713, P<0.05) between the Zn and Cu in
the population of mollusk. This study shown, there is no influencing from both elements in
mollusk. Both elements are independent.
63
Chapter 9: Statistic for Environmental Research
m) Regression (using Microsoft Excel to create the graph and add the tradeline)
The figure below shown the equation regression line y 0.0184 x 4.0027 and
R2=0.0101, so, R 0.0101 0.1005 (In this case, there is a no relationship among the
variables; the value of R is far from 1.00)
The figure below shown the equation regression line y 0.0007 x 0.1233 and
R2=0.0091, so, R 0.0091 0.0954 (In this case, there is a no relationship among the
variables; the value of R is far from 1.00)
The figure below shown the equation regression line y 0..0184 x 4.0027 and
R2=0.0101, so, R 0.0101 0.1005 (In this case, there is a no relationship among the
variables; the value of R is far from 1.00)
64
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
SCIENTIFIC PROJECT
REPORT 10
10.1 SCIENTIFIC PROJECT REPORT OUTLINE
Project proposal and final report writing must follow the format set by the Faculty of Science
and Natural Resources (FSSA), where students must refer to “Panduan Penulisan Disertasi”
book. Students also need to seek their supervisors’ approval before submitting the proposals
and full report to FSSA main office.
Towards the end of the first semester, each student is required to submit two (2) copies of
their project proposals to be evaluated. The content of the project proposal report must
follow the format given below.
Front Page
Table of Content
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Symbols and Abbreviations
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Literature Review
Chapter 3 Methodology
References
Student is required to submit two (2) copies of their final report at the end of the second
semester to be evaluated. The content of the final report must follow the format given below.
65
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
Front page
Declaration
Verification
Acknowledgement
Abstrak
Abstract
Table of Content
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Symbols and Abbreviations
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Literature Review
Chapter 3 Methodology
Chapter 4 Results and discussion
Chapter 5 Conclusion
References
Appendix
a) Be concise. The report should be written scientifically, whereby it has to be clear and
straightforward. It is very important to use as few words as possible but at the same time
manage to cover as much details as needed. Scientific reports should be comprehensive
and repetition should be avoided.
b) Write in third person sentence structure. The report should be written using the third
person and all activities must be described in the past tense (except future activities
outlined in the proposal report). For example, do not use ‘I’, ‘you’ or ‘we’ in the report.
Instead of:
"I have analyzed the experimental results" write "The experimental results have
been analyzed".
“We have conducted a water quality test for the untreated gravity water resource”
change to “The study has conducted a water quality test for the untreated gravity
water resource”.
“From this study if anyone is interested to venture into oil palm as a source of
income, he or she could plan to buy a suitable land size and the area that could
derive a maximum revenue from the oil palm yields” change to third person
sentence “From this study, in oil palm venture it is found that the land size and the
land area the important factors that can maximize the revenue of the oil palm
yields”.
66
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
“According to farm supervisor Mr. Soreal Mansor (2013), many palm trees in oil
palm plantations in Jerudo were planted in mid-2005 and 2006 and this resulted in
the yield production for 2010 to 2011 did not reach the maximum production for
oil palm age immature of 6 to 7 years” change to “According to Soreal Mansor
(2013), many palm trees in oil palm plantations in Jerudo were planted in mid-
2005 and 2006 and this resulted in the yield production for 2010 to 2011 did not
reach the maximum production for oil palm age immature of 6 to 7 years”.
c) Language. The proposal report and final report should be written in Bahasa Melayu.
Permission from both the supervisor and the Dean of Faculty of Science and Natural
Resources is required to write a report in English. The style of writing should be formal
and easily understood by readers. It is very important to use proper Bahasa Melayu @
English grammar and sentence structure. If other languages are used, it must be italicized.
For example:
Every chapter has specific content that describes the process, progress and results of the
project. The outline content of what should go into each chapter of the report writing or
project report is given below.
a) Introduction
i. The background to the investigation, briefly stating the significance and contribution
reasons of this research governing the need for the investigation. This background
should reflect the title of the project.
ii. Problem statement including the precise definition and importance. Introduction
should avoid very technical definitions and statements (present them in Chapter 2).
67
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
iii. The main aims or objectives of the investigation. The main objectives of the study
together with the outline of research must be as concise as possible and should not
contain argument or discussion.
iv. The scope of research must be spelled-out clearly together with limitations. It should
have a good flow, natural, style of writing and should read like a story.
v. Research contributions or proposed solutions (why they are expected to be better or
essence of the idea(s) used in proposed solutions), research conditions, assumptions
and limitations of the research done.
b) Literature Review
For scientific projects, literature review gives some current information on research findings
based on previous study related to the research topic. In this section, student must provide a
brief, clear statement of the rationale for their approach to the problem studied. Student need
to express the different views of the research topic that will be essential for the development
of the framework for research. Student also must have an original critical opinions not just
reporting from previous research. Student can use the previous research and presented in the
forms of paraphrase, quotation or simply stating the data from the source.
All references selected must be up-to-date. Student must evaluate all the information
retrieved (books, journals, magazines, thesis, internet or articles) and write a summary on its
significance to the research project. It should be relevant, sensible and concise with original
evidence. All reference sources in text must be recorded clearly with correct format citations
and listed in the references chapter. In this chapter also, student can review about techniques,
methods, equipment or technology that has been used in previous study or will be used in the
project.
c) Methodology
This chapter reports on the overall approach and framework chosen during design and
implementation of the scientific project. Research methodology describes the methods and
techniques used such as sampling stations, types of sample, variables and measurement,
type/method of data collection, instrumentation and techniques of data analysis. The
parameters used in research methodology must reflect the theoretical framework so that the
objectives of study can be attained.
68
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
ii. Research Design: In research designs, it will provide the structure of the scientific
research and student carefully planning the research approach. The student should
identify, define and provide justification/rationale of the choice of specific methods used
and cite the methods source. The research study can be conducted based on the nature
of study. There are several elements will be considered: sampling type, how the data be
collected/ generated, how will the data be analyzed, how to obtain results and how to
identify and acknowledge any issues or barriers.
iii. Sampling methods: In this section, detailed description of sampling method and the
actual sample size should be provided.
iv. Data Collection Methods: Student should describe the major methods for collecting
data from the subjects. Data collection and sampling can be carried out in the form of
quantitative or qualitative measurements. All equipment / instrument should be
specified fully (i.e. model numbers, reference numbers). This specification may also
include the accuracy, validity and reliability of the equipment used.
vi. Data Analysis Methods: The student should identify and describe appropriate data
analysis methods for the study. Two types of data analysis method:
This chapter is generally considered as the most critical section of the scientific Project 2. The
findings should be presented and analysed on the basis of the specific objectives, hypotheses
or research questions. The results section always begins with text, reporting the main results
without interpretation. Write the text of the Results section concisely, objectively and logical
sequence using both text and illustrative materials. If the study didn’t get the anticipated or
negative results, it should be reported and it may mean that the hypothesis was incorrect and
needs to be reformulated or further research is needed.
69
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
Discussion section will provide interpretation and the analysis of the results by comparing
them to the findings of previous studies or theoretical background presented in the literature
review.
Tables, charts or graphs should be used to present quantitative data along with the
explanation.
All tables, graphs or chart should be referred directly within the text, in such a way in
describing the outcomes of the study. If the information can summarize in one
sentence, then a table or graph is not necessary.
Report findings must write in the past tense.
Avoid present the same data in both a table and figure. Decide whether a figure or
table is the more effective way to present the data.
Avoid report raw data, unless the raw data is more critical. Raw data can be including
in an Appendix.
Result findings must be present in a clear and easy to understand manner.
The topics of the discussion should follow the same order as the Results section.
Interpret the results of each of the studies presented in the Results.
Focus on whether results supported specific hypotheses presented in the introduction
and the cited literature.
Describe limitations of the research, potential applications of the findings, and ideas
for further research
This chapter highlights the findings along with recommendation for future research of the
study upon which a conclusion is drawn in line with the objectives of project. Be specific
when drawing conclusions. Conclusions should be based on real results of the project. It is not
necessary that all the conclusions are positive. Negative conclusions are sometimes more
valuable than positive ones. It is suitable as well to discuss in this chapter the alternative
methods that could be taken to solve the identified research problems and suggestions for
future research work based on the findings and conclusions generated from the study. It also
can include the contribution of this study towards end-user communities or societies.
70
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
f) References
References are the detailed description of resources from which information, theory or ideas
were obtained in preparing the scientific project report. A proper format of citations must be
followed which come from books, journals, magazines, thesis, articles, internet, etc. The detail
references written format should follow the “Panduan Penulisan Disertasi” FSSA book. The
details of every references cited in the text MUST be listed in this chapter and list in
alphabetical order. If more than one published materials by the same author are cited, these
materials should be listed chronologically. Articles in PDF format are acceptable for reference
and internet information should only be treated as secondary or supporting reference.
Appendix C show easy step to compile a cited sources.
g) Abstract
Abstract is a single sheet which gives an overview of the whole report and it is required with
all research projects. The abstract should never exceed one page (not exceeding 200-300
words) and should be considered as an alternative to reading the whole report, not as an
introduction to it. An abstract summarizes the main point of a piece of writing that includes
the field of study, the aim of the project, problem definition, methodology adopted, research
process, results and conclusions reached. It should be written only when almost all section of
the report have been completed. Abstracts typically serve to help readers decide if they
should read an entire article and to understand the achievement of report project by acting as
a pre-reading outline of key points. An abstract in both Bahasa Melayu and English are
required. Bahasa Melayu report written must include abstract and title project in English, and
vice versa. Both abstract and abstrak sections should be separated.
h) Appendices
The appendices are supplementary materials that are not compulsory for the report but help
in better understanding. Material that would seriously obstruct the flow of the text or ideas of
the report should also be placed into appendices. This could be extensive technical details or
explanation of mathematical derivation/procedures, lists of numerical data, maps and extra
photographs, analysis output, diagrams of specialized equipment, questionnaire form etc. as
additional information or reference to the text to support a report. All appendices should be
titled and numbered alphabetically. All material placed into the appendices should be cited in
the text of the report. For example: "Illustrations of typical equipment are shown in Appendix
B". All appendices also must be listed in the List of Appendices page (Appendix G).
71
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
i) Acknowledgement
a) Page Formatting
b) Figures in Text
All figures must be numbered with respect to the chapter. For example, Figure 4.1 is
the first figure that appears in Chapter 4.
Figure should be positioned after it has been cited for the first time in the text.
All figures must have a caption and should be positioned at the bottom of the figure.
Caption should be bold and written in Sentence case. The caption should describe the
figure accordingly. For example:
c) Tables in Text
All tables must be numbered with respect to the chapter. For example, Table 4.1 is the
first table that appears in Chapter 4.
A table should be positioned after it has been cited for the first time in the text.
All tables must have a caption, which should be positioned at the top of the table.
Caption should be bold and written in Sentence case. For example:
Table 4.1 Mean concentration of heavy metals (mgkg−1) in C. obtusa and sediment
Heavy metal concentration (mgkg−1)
Metals Cerithidea obtusa Sediment
Mean Lower Upper Mean Lower Upper
Cd 0.66 0.41 0.81 2.23 0.74 3.64
Cr 1.11 0.84 1.61 11.65 8.41 16.61
Cu 16.01 10.14 28.08 65.00 12.81 26.58
Fe 89.51 96.86 92.43 53.29 84.09 99.59
Pb 0.30 0.10 0.66 7.78 4.68 17.43
Zn 12.79 10.77 17.12 13.66 7.49 23.64
d) Equations in Text
e) Tables of Content
All sections and their sub-sections should be listed appropriately with their associated
page numbers. Refer to Appendix D.
73
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
f) List of Tables
All indication and labels must be clear in the list of tables. Refer to Appendix E.
g) List of Figures
All indication and labels must be clear in the list of figures. Refer to Appendix F.
h) List of Appendices
All indication and labels must be clear in the list of appendices. Refer to Appendix G.
All indication and labels must be clear in the list of symbols and abbreviations. Refer to
Appendix H.
10.3 PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism is the act of using someone else’s ideas or words without acknowledgement. All
idea or words whether deliberate or accidental plagiarized is a serious matter and punishable
offense in research projects. Students must make a report project using their own words and
must not contain any plagiarize material. The report should clearly mention any work that is
not student work whenever such work is presented. Students found guilty of plagiarism will
get an E grade in scientific project.
Accidental plagiarism occurs when a student draws phrases or words from someone else’s
research writing and presenting them as their own work without providing complete source
citation. Accidental plagiarism may include:
1. Copying someone else’s report writing - paragraphs, sentences, pictures, maps, ideas,
concepts and tables from sources such as journals, textbooks, magazines, internet and
others without proper source citation.
2. Forgetting to place quotation marks around original author words.
3. Omitting or paraphrasing a source citation someone else’s idea without
acknowledgement in a source citation to the original authors.
74
Chapter 10: Scientific Project Report
If the student wants to use the ideas or research finding from other sources, he/she must
obtain a written permission from the original authors. It is unethical if the student did not do
the citation or credited to the original authors. To avoid plagiarism, students are encourage
rephrasing or constructing their own words from reading many sources and should always
acknowledge other research reports that are not common knowledge. Students are also
prohibited from seeking friend’s help to write the report or using a thesis writing ‘service’ to
write the written report. It is a breach of academic integrity to hand in work that is not their
own or to use parts of another student's paper.
75
Environmental Science: Scientific Project Guidelines
ASSESSMENT
GUIDELINES 11
11.1 MARKING SCHEME
The assessment of the scientific project work will be based on a proposal / viva-voce
presentation, report writing and supervision. The detail marking scheme are listed in
Appendix I – N. The variety of rubric assessment features include:
b) Supervisor Point
c) Report Writing
Presentation/Writing
Format, spelling and language comply with FSSA’s format
Text well organized and easy to understand
Clear and relevant illustrations
76
Chapter 11: Assessment Guidelines
Content
Introduction with clear and sufficient evidence of research
Sufficient and appropriate literature review
Sufficient, clear and relevant methodology
Results and analysis with adequate, appropriate, accurate and fulfils the study
objectives
Results discussed in a scientific manner and accompanied by relevant supporting
references
References with complete and written in the correct format
Clear conclusion
Oral presentations are considered as an important part of the scientific project assessment
because of the importance placed on communications skills both in academia and industry.
Communication skills, which not only mean in spoken or written languages is also refer to an
individual's ability to transfer information in a manner that is interesting, accurate,
informative and concise. The purpose of the scientific project oral presentation is to train
students in presenting and defending the objectives, research analysis, findings and
conclusions of their own research projects. Formal dressing is needed.
An oral presentation by each final year student is compulsory. The scientific project
presentation is assessed in general both on content and delivery to ensure that the student is
able to communicate project work done that is of a standard worthy of an honours degree.
The presentation should describe the aim of the project, an outline of the presentation, the
results obtained and the extent to which the goals of the project are met. The scientific project
presentation will be graded according to proposal / viva-voce presentation evaluation rubric
form as shown in Appendix K and N.
The supervisor(s) and the examiner will attend and assess the presentation. Student must
bring PowerPoint presentation on a USB flash drive and each student should arrive for the
presentation earlier and stay for the presentation after their own. Student must have a plan B
in the event of technical difficulties such as a laptop with a copy of slide presentation, extra
flash drive or handouts. The time allocated for the presentation session is usually 10 to 15
minutes and an additional 5 minutes for the question and answer session. Questions will be
asked to assess the student’s understanding and knowledge of the project.
77
Chapter 11: Assessment Guidelines
a) Scientific Project 1
78
Chapter 11: Assessment Guidelines
b) Scientific Project 2
Practice / rehearse presentation in advance. Measure presentation time. Make sure not
exceed time limit.
Speak with good pace/speed and clear language so that the audience is able to listen and
follow the presentation.
Stand straight, be confident and face the audience. Practice good eye contact to
audience.
Try to emphasis: body language, gestures, pitch and expression to highlight important
points.
Use a laser pointer on the screen. Don’t stand between the projector and the screen. The
screen must be visible for assessment panel and audience.
During the question and answer session, the student should be able to answer in details,
accurate and confidently. Try to communicate fluently to answer basic/fundamental
questions within the areas/scopes of the project.
79
Chapter 11: Assessment Guidelines
Take some time to think of how to answer the questions rather than answering it
immediately. Answer straight to the point.
Questions can be answered by simple English statements or with the use of visual aids.
Do not try to make-up an answer for a question. Please admit if unable to answer a
particular question and move on.
Do some homework. Think, prepare and practice for questions that could be asked.
80
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)
GENERAL
81
FAQs
SUPERVISION
82
FAQs
Q: What should I do if I want to get raw / secondary data from an outside organization?
To get data from an outside organization, the formal letter must be made through the faculty.
Application letter will be made after you fill out a form in the Deputy Dean (HEPA) Office.
83
FAQs
SUBMISSION
Q: Can I submit the final written report for assessment in soft copy?
No. The final written report should be submitted in ring bind for assessment.
Q: When is the deadline for the submission of the hard cover copies of my thesis?
You must submit the hard cover thesis to the faculty on week 18 to Bilik Sumber FSSA.
Q: What are the consequences if I fail to submit my scientific project to the FSSA Office
by Week 13?
Failure to submit within the specified deadline will be penalized accordingly. Ultimately, you
will be given Grade E (Fail) for your project.
Q: Can I present the proposal / viva before sending the written report for assessment?
No. You are not allowed to present a proposal / viva if you have not sent the written report.
84
REFERENCES
Bluman, G. A. 2007. Elementary Statistics: A step by step approach. Seventh Edition. McGraw –Hill
Companies, Inc. New York. ISBN: 978-0-07-009178-8
Bryan, F. J. M. 2009. Statistics for Environmental Science and Management. Chapman and Hall: New
York.
Cole, R., Young, T. & Newport, D. 2012. Guidelines for the Preparation and Submission of Final Year
Project Reports. Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering Department.
University of Limerick. http://www2.ul.ie/pdf/714746740.pdf
Eiselen, R., Uys, T. & Potgieter, N. 2005. Analysis Survey Data Using SPSS13: A Workbook. University
of Johannesburg.
Final Year Project Guidelines. 2012. Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology.
http://www.fcsit.unimas.my/images/must_read/FCSIT_FYP_Guidelines.pdf.
Final Year Project Report Guidelines. 2012. Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman.
http://www.utar.edu.my/fes/file/FES%20FYP%20Report%20Guidelines-R2.pdf.
Neil, A. W. 1999. Introductory Statistics. Fifth Edition. Addison Wesley Longman. United States of
America.
PSM Handbook. 2010. Department of Computer Systems and Communications, FSKSM, UTM.
Short Guide to Writing Your Final Year Project Report or MSc Dissertation. 2011. School of
Computer Science and Informatics. Cardiff University.
https://www.cs.cf.ac.uk/PATS2/wiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=project-report.pdf
Stewart, A.M., Bowman, K., Buckley, S., Graves, M., Landis, C., Werner, N., Patterson, N. & Rivera, Y.
2009. A Research Guide for Students and Teachers. College of Environmental Science and
Forestry. State University of New York. Syracuse, NY.
Szecsi, T. 2006. Student Guide to Final Year Projects. School of Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering. Dublin City University.
http://webpages.dcu.ie/~szecsit/Modules/Final_Year_Project/FYP_Guide_Edition_6.pdf
85
APPENDIX A
Supervisor Approval Form (HS11-SP01)
STUDENT INFORMATION
Name:
Matric Number:
Handphone No.:
E-mail Address:
SUPERVISOR APPROVAL
I agree/do not agree* to be the supervisor for this student for the project entitled:
Official Stamp :
PROJECT INFORMATION
Please attaches the project information in accordance with the following format:
(a) Project background including significance of study and literature reviews (maximum
300 words)
(b) Objective(s)
Example:
1. To identify......
2. To assess ......
3. To investigate.....
(c) Methodology
1. Description of methodology
2. Flow chart of research activities
3. Gantt chart of research activities
(d) References
86
APPENDIX B
MAKLUMAT PELAJAR
Student Details
Penyelia i) ____________________________________________________________________________________
Supervisor(s) ii)____________________________________________________________________________________
87
APPENDIX B
Log Book /FYP02
1 8
2 9
3 10
4 11
5 12
6 13
7 14
Tandatangan Penyelia /
Supervisor’s Signature: _________________________
Cop Rasmi/
Official Stamp:
88
APPENDIX B
Log Book /FYP03
Cadangan Pencapaian
Minggu Hadapan
Expected Achievement
For Next Week
Masalah / Persoalan /
Ketidakpastian
Problems / Questions /
Uncertainties
89
APPENDIX B
Log Book /FYP04
1 8
2 9
3 10
4 11
5 12
6 13
7 14
Tandatangan Penyelia /
Supervisor’s Signature: _________________________
Cop Rasmi/
Official Stamp:
90
APPENDIX B
Log Book /FYP05
Cadangan Pencapaian
Minggu Hadapan
Expected Achievement
For Next Week
Masalah / Persoalan /
Ketidakpastian
Problems / Questions /
Uncertainties
91
APPENDIX B
Log Book /FYP06
Borang ini hendaklah dilengkapkan oleh pelajar dan diserahkan kepada Penyelaras Projek Saintifik sebelum
mengemukakan jilid keras laporan akhir kepada pihak Fakulti (sebelum minggu ke 18)
This form should be completes by the student and submitted to Scientific Project Coordinator before submission of
hard cover final report to the Faculty (before week 18)
92
APPENDIX C
Author: Author:
Title: Title:
Volume: Volume:
1. 5.
Page: Page:
Year: Year:
Publication: Publication:
Author: Author:
Title: Title:
Volume: Volume:
2. 6.
Page: Page:
Year: Year:
Publication: Publication:
Author: Author:
Title: Title:
Volume: Volume:
3. 7.
Page: Page:
Year: Year:
Publication: Publication:
Author: Author:
Title: Title:
Volume: Volume:
4. 8.
Page: Page:
Year: Year:
Publication: Publication:
93
APPENDIX D
TABLE OF CONTENT
Pages
DECLARATION ii
CERTIFIED BY iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENT vii
LIST OF TABLES ix
LIST OF FIGURES x
LIST OF APPENDICES xi
LISTS OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS xii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.1.1 ….. 2
1.1.2 …… 3
1.2 Objectives
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 24
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 48
REFERENCE 48
APPENDIX 56
94
APPENDIX E
Example of List of Tables
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
4.3 ………………………………………………………………… 64
95
APPENDIX F
Example of List of Figures
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
3.2 Flow Chart of general steps for all stages during this study 57
4.4 ………………………………………………………….. 47
96
APPENDIX G
Example of List of Appendices
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Page
G ……………………………………………………….. 64
97
APPENDIX H
Example of List of Symbols and Abbreviations
% Percentage
& and
°C Degree Celsius
cm Centimeter
µg microgramme
mm milimeter
pg picogramme
mg miligramme
ng nanogramme
L litre
g gramme
DO Dissolved oxygen
EC Electrical conductivity
DCM Dichloromethane
σ Sigma
β Beta
98
APPENDIX I
(i) Pengenalan (Adakah ia memberi gambaran yang jelas dan mencukupi mengenai
kajian yang telah dan akan dijalankan? Rasional untuk kajian?)
/ 10
Introduction (Does it give a clear and sufficient evidence of research that has been
and will be conducted? Rationales for the research?)
(ii) Ulasan Perpustakaan (Adakah ia mencukupi dan sesuai dengan tajuk kajian?)
/ 15
Literature Review (Is it sufficient and appropriate to the topic of study?)
(iii) Metodologi (Adakah ia mencukupi, jelas dan relevan?)
/ 15
Methodology (Is it sufficient, clear and relevant to the research objectives?)
(iv) Rujukan ( Adakah senarai rujukan lengkap dan ditulis mengikut format?)
/5
References (Is the reference list complete, and written in the correct format?)
/60
Signature : _____________________________________________________
Date : _____________________________________________________
99
APPENDIX J
Scientific Project 1: Supervisor’s Point Rubric
Points
A EVALUATION CRITERIA
awarded
Initiative
(i) /4
(Did this candidate initiate his / her own research activities?)
Laboratory or field work
(ii) (Did the candidate spend the equivalent of 3 credit hours performing the scientific /4
Project 1 in this semester?)
Candidate’s research skill
(iii) (Did the candidate demonstrate a trustworthy research workmanship? Is the research /4
data produced reliable?)
Intellectual advancement
(iv) (Did the candidate demonstrate a significant / normal / mild / no intellectual /4
advancement in his or her research niche?)
Time management and progress
(v) /4
(Is this candidate a last minute or consistent doer?)
Total points awarded to the candidate (higher point signifies better performance) 20
Total
B STUDENT NAME (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v)
(20%)
10
C ENDORSEMENT BY SUPERVISOR
Date: _____________________________________
100
APPENDIX K
Total
B STUDENT MATRIC NO. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi)
(20%)
10
C ENDORSEMENT BY EVALUATOR
Date: _____________________________________
101
APPENDIX L
Scientific Project 2: Writing Evaluation Rubric
Markah
Laporan Projek Saintifik 2 / Scientific Project 2 Report
Points
A Penyampaian/penulisan laporan
Presentation/ writing of report
(i) Format, Ejaan dan Bahasa (Adakah ia mengikut format FSSA, ejaan betul dan
bahasa lancar?)
/5
Format, Spelling and Language (Does it comply with FSSA’s format; having
correct spelling and is grammatically correct?)
(ii) Susunan Teks (Adakah ia teratur, mudah difahami dan ada kesinambungan
dengan perenggan lain)
/5
Text flow (Is it well organized, easy to understand and has continuity with other
paragraphs?)
(iii) Illustrasi (Adakah rajah,foto,jadual,graf dan sebagainya cukup jelas dan
relevan) /5
Illustrations (Are the figures, pictures, tables, graphs and etc clear and relevant?)
B Isi Kandungan
Table of contents
(i) Pengenalan/ Ulasan Perpustakaan/ Methodology (Adakah ia mencukupi, jelas
dan relevan?)
/ 10
Introduction / Literature Review / Methodology (Is it sufficient, clear and
relevant)
(ii) Hasil dan Analisis (Adakah ia mencukupi, sesuai, tepat dan menjawab objektif
kajian?)
/ 30
Results and Analysis (Is it adequate, appropriate, accurate and fulfils the study
objectives? Did the candidate manage to describe/summarise his/her results?)
(iii) Perbincangan (Adakah hasil dibincangkan secara saintifik dan disertakan
dengan sokongan rujukan yang relevan? Adakah ia menjawab objektif kajian?)
Discussion (Are the results discussed in a scientific manner and accompanied by / 30
relevant supporting references? Does it answer the objectives of the study? Any
attempt to interpret the results?)
(iv) Kesimpulan ( Adakah ia merangkumi keseluruhan kajian?)
/ 10
Conclusion (Does it answer the objective(s)?)
(v) Rujukan ( Adakah senarai rujukan lengkap dan ditulis mengikut format)
/5
References (Is the reference list complete, and written in the correct format?)
/100
Signature : _____________________________________________________
Date : _____________________________________________________
102
APPENDIX M
Scientific Project 2: Supervisor’s Point Rubric
Initiative
(i) /2
(Did this candidate have initiatives in his/her own research activities?)
Laboratory or field work
(ii) (Did this candidate spend the equivalent of 6 credit hours performing the Project 2 in /5
this semester?)
Candidate’s research skill
(iii) (Did this candidate demonstrate a trustworthy research workmanship? Is the /5
research data produced reliable?)
Intellectual advancement
(iv) (Did this candidate demonstrate a significant / normal / mild / no intellectual /5
advancement in his or her research niche?)
Time management and progress
(v) /3
(Did the candidate manage his/her project well?)
Total points awarded to the candidate (higher point signifies better performance) 20
Total
B STUDENT NAME (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v)
(20%)
1
10
C ENDORSEMENT BY SUPERVISOR
Date: _____________________________________
103
APPENDIX N
Points
A EVALUATION CRITERIA
awarded
Suitability of the title
(i) /2
(Does it reflect the content of the work?)
Research background
(ii) /3
(Are the research question and literature review stated clearly?)
Objective/s
(iii) /3
(Are the objectives clearly defined and have been achieved?)
Methodology
(iv) /5
(Are the description stated clearly and of acceptable standard?)
Results and Discussion
(v) / 10
(Did the candidate summarise, evaluate and interpret the results?)
Communication skills
(vi) /3
(Correct use of grammar and intonation, body language etc.?)
Question and answering skills
(vii) /4
(Ability to communicate with sensible answer?)
Total points awarded to the candidate (higher point signifies better performance) 30
Total
B STUDENT MATRIC NO. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii)
(30%)
1
10
C ENDORSEMENT BY EVALUATOR
Date: _____________________________________
104
Environmental Science Programme
Faculty of Science & Natural Resources
Universiti Malaysia Sabah
Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu Sabah
Phone: 088-320000 ext 5872
Fax: 088-435324
E-mail: pej.fssa@ums.edu.my
http://www.ums.edu.my/fssa/