archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/MagneticBell_04.

pdf
more of this topic at http://www.stealthskater.com/Science.htm#MagneticBell

note: because important websites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was
archived from http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2388 on
September 3, 2008. This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned web-
site. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if the updated original cannot be
found at the original author's site.

The Tesla Beograd WWII Nazi Bell Connection

comments by Jack Sarfatti, PhD Physics

[Jack]: I am keeping almost everything anonymous {xxxxxxxxxx}to emphasize the physics and not
the people.

Posted on Saturday, May 26, 2007 @ 18:16:21 PDT by William Alek [aka vlad]:

I personally saw a craft of this type execute 2 right-angle turns while covering 9 miles of airspace in
under a 1½ seconds on December 13, 1989 just north of the Ontario International Airport over Rancho
Cucamonga at about 11:44 PM on that date. It produced no sonic boom. I roughly calculated that the
object, a brilliant, bluish-white sphere had to been travelling upwards of 12,000-to-14,000 miles-per-
hour. It was headed (just by coincidence) in the direction of Edwards AFB.

It has been a while since I talked to {xxxxxxxxxx}. He did attempt to explain how he THOUGHT it
might work. But it sounded like something I had seen in Moray B. King's second book on Tapping
Zero-Point Energy. The gist of the circuit's operation -- in what little detail {xxxxxxxxxx} has shared
with me -- went something like the following with components oriented in the following way.

The "capacitor section" of the circuit (as shown in my ARV cutaway illustration) is made up of 48
individual plate capacitor sections. Each section is comprised of 8 long, thin, isosceles triangular plates,
each approximately ½-inch thick.

[Jack] Can you send that? Or is that it below?

Between each plate is about ¾-inch of dielectric material. {xxxxxxxxxx} thinks that it's Dow
Chemical Co's G-10, resin-based plastic. But it is not. The individual sections are stacked in an order
that lines up with the gaps in the adjacent sections so that the plates in one vertical section line up with
the gaps in the 2 stacks on either side of it.

Something like this as viewed while looking at the outer edge and towards the center of the array:

========....................========....................========
...................========....................========
========....................========....................========
1
 In the center of this radially-oriented array all cast within a single chunk of dielectric is "the central
column". Brad stated that he did not know what was inside it but that it contained Mercury vapor (a
"noble gas"). He referred to it as the "Amplifier Section". But this was about all he claimed that he
knew concerning this component. (Or so he said at the time).

[Jack] Reminds me of the "Nazi Bell machine".

The bottom of the crew compartment sphere (which measured 12 feet in diameter on the 24-foot
diameter ARV) was flush with the bottom of the cast capacitor section. The amplifier section was a
column approximately 24 inches in diameter that ran vertically up through the center of the sphere with
its upper end embedded in the Carbon-Kevlar pultruded material of the crew compartment.

At the center of the column was a 2-inch thick metallic disc approximately 9-feet in diameter . It was
designed to spin around the central column on a concentric axis. This component was thought to be a
homopolar generator. Brad said it also contributed to vehicle stability in low-power, hover mode. It
was centered in the plane of the next component (the "Antenna Section").

Around the outer surface of the crew compartment sphere was another casting. Within it appeared to
be multiple loops of ¼-inch thick copper wire or tubing. (I have forgotten what Brad said specifically
on this point). But the component was about 24 inches wider than the crew compartment in radius and
was about 9 inches thick with its out edge milled in a manner that provide a frustrum-shaped mounting
surface that lined up with the outer edge of the cap section below it. This ring -- which gave the crew
compartment the appearance of the planet Saturn -- was referred to as the "Antenna Section".

Another witness told me that the crew compartment sphere was trapped between the flanges of the
upper and lower halves of the crew compartment sphere. During an ejection, the upper section is
jettisoned along with the central column and the 4 ejection seats mounted on it back-to-back. Brad did
not know this. The witness suggested that this feature protected the crew from the effects of the
ionization and X-ray photons (?) around the highly-charged craft in the event of an ejection. He also
suggested that the upper crew compartment section could act as a rudimentary heat shield if a re-entry
into the atmosphere was required.

It doesn't take much imagination in looking at the bare-bones assembly to visualize this as a very
large and cleverly-constructed, self-powered Tesla Coil system. In fact, it looks remarkably like the
layout of a design that Tesla discussed in an early-20th Century newspaper article for a craft he called the
"Ion Craft" (or something like that). The layout was very close to this configuration. This general
layout also comes very close to matching the layout of the "ElectroHydroDynamic Vehicle" patented by
James Frank King Jr. -- a technician working in the Labs of Agnew Bahnson with Thomas Townsend
Brown.

[Jack] Has anybody written a real physics analysis of this with explanation? At the moment, I
cannot "connect the dots" to get an idea how this thing could possibly fly. If it did, it would
be some kind of EM stress drive with g-forces like any conventional craft and therefore not
an alien saucer for sure. A WWII Nazi craft? Okay …

2
... and I never fully agreed about the layout of the Tesla Coil circuit. He felt that both primary and
secondary coils were encapsulated in the outer ring. My belief was that the ring (r "Amplifier Section")
was the primary winding set and the secondaries were wrapped around the central column (or
"Amplifier Section"). {xxxxxxxxxx} didn't seem to know (or at least never stated to me) which
configuration was correct.

[Jack] What is being "amplified"? Magnetic field presumably.

In {xxxxxxxxxxxxx's} mind, the circuit worked like this. Two 24-volt deep cycle marine batteries
were used to power up the rotation of the homopolar generator. It in turn produced a much higher
voltage potential that was stored on each capacitor section, charging them up sequentially in parallel.
After the full array was charged, the entire bank of capacitors would discharge in series through the
central column (kind of like a cyclotron tube, further boosting the voltage. I seem to recall that ionic
resonance played a role here as well.

One witness who claimed his mother had worked on the project said that the Mercury ions in the
amplifier section had to be in resonance with the dielectric material in the capacitor section for it to work
properly. He never told me "why", though. He did say that was why the dielectric material was critical
to the {yyyyyyyyyyyyy'}s operation. I have never shared what that material is with {xxxxxxxxxx}
because of the manner in which he has treated me over the years. But it isn't plastic!

[Jack] While this is all very interesting. I still am mystified of what the basic lift mechanism could
be here. I need to see it mathematically expressed in terms of electrodynamics of continuous
media like in the Landau-Lifshitz book. Now is this dielectric supposed to be alien ET or Nazi
WWII? {xxxxxxxxxxxxx} at {yyyyyyyyyyyyy} spoke of Nazi WWII stuff roughly like what you
describe.

Basically we have electrons and nuclei and a near non-radiating EM field to first
approximation. Not enough far field radiation to make lift. We sure do not have Ivanov's 10 9
volts/cm needed to bend space directly for real zero g-force warp drive. Nor do we have his
current densities. In terms of the dynamical action 'A', we have

A(Matter) + A(EM Field)

with minimal coupling i.e. covariant derivatives D = d + eA in A(Matter) where A is the EM 1-

form potential and

A(EM Field) = *FΛF/4

F = dA

Maxwell's field equations are

dF = 0 (Faraday EM induction + zero divergence of B magnetic field)

d*F = *J (Ampere's law + Gauss's law)

3
 for D & H field with all the DIELECTRIC resonance inhomogeneities etc. in *F and *J(electric
currents).

Okay? Now {xxxxxxxxxxxx} et-al and {xxxxxxxxxxx} independently shot down

{xxxxxxxxxxxx's} EM stress drive with specific arguments. Remember, {xxxxxxxxxxxx} is a Tesla
expert having access to the Tesla files in Beograd.

However, there is a very simple general proof that no EM stress system can fly if the symmetry
group is the 10-parameter Poincare group of 1905 Einstein Special Relativity. This is Noether's
theorem. The total linear momentum of matter + EM field is a constant of the motion. The near
EM field is stuck to the matter of the ship. Therefore no propellantless propulsion no lift is
possible. The center of mass of matter + EM field has conserved momentum and the mass is not
changing.

Torsion fields might change this because then the torsion field stress-energy density tensor is
not symmetric. Also note that a vortex ring in the fabric of space itself would be a kind of warp
field with "motion" perpendicular to the ring (like in hydrodynamics).

This high-voltage discharge fired through the central column was then routed back to be stored on
each individual cap section again, this time in parallel with each section carrying the new "higher"
voltage than it started with. The sections were then discharged in series again starting the whole cycle
over again, firing again and again, in each cycle reaching progressively higher voltages.

I felt that there were some very important reasons why the cap sections were oriented as they were
and {xxxxxxxxxxx} did not necessarily agree with my POV. I believed that part of the purpose of the
array's radial construction was to act as a kind of swash plate solution to the levitation created by the
high voltage charging and discharging of the plate capacitor sections. A result of the Biefield-Brown
Effect. Alter the voltage level in one section and you could create the effects of yaw and pitch while the
craft was in flight.

In fact, {xxxxxxxxxxxx} more-or-less confirmed this point, in noting that while he observed the
craft in the hangar at Skunkworks, there was a bowl-shaped mechanism rising out of one arm of the
pilot's ejection seat that would respond to the pull of gravity. And if the craft tilted slightly to one side,
the bowl would swing in pendulum-fashion in the direction of the tilt (apparently still subject to some
gravitation in the environment) and the ARV would automatically right itself. He said the motion of the
craft while hovering unmanned in the hangar was like watching a large ship drifting softly while tied up
at a pier.

My opinion was that the Biefield-Brown effect was merely a flight control mechanism. The real
acceleration and dramatic performance of the craft was caused by whatever was going on in the central
column. {xxxxxxxxxxxx} suggested to me that it was tapping into "scalar waves" when he first
described it to me. He also mentioned that the atmosphere in the part of the hangar where the three
ARV's were isolated was significantly colder than the other areas of the hangar. It was about 102
degrees outside that day (I checked with the NWS) and he said it felt like it was around 70 degrees in the
area around the ARV's.

This colder temperature is consistent with stories we've heard in the past with "cold current" where
circuits tapping into the ZPE actually began to frost over.

[Jack] I do not see how that is possible with this kind of device.
4
 In my discussions with {xxxxxxxxxxxxx} regarding this craft, I speculated that the core of the
"Amplifier Section" was using some aspect of plasma physics to generate a "doorway" for tapping the
ZPE. I asked him if there was such a thing as "virtual plasma, and he got rather excited, saying that
there was much speculation in the physics community about that very concept being a means of tapping
into the ZPE. My reading in plasma physics and in trying to comprehend the ion behavior in the
"Amplifier Section" led me to wonder if there were some special conditions that existed within the
central column.

[Jack] That's vacuum polarization. But the effect is very weak. And that's the problem here. I do
not see how an ionized plasma will strongly couple to the virtual electron-positron pairs
inside the vacuum. Maybe … But one has to show exactly how with the math of
mainstream physics.

... began opining some "vortexian" process that occurred within the column, tapping the ZPE in a
manner suggested in the work of Viktor Schauberger of Germany back in the 1920s, 30s and 40s. That
the ions had to "precess" in some particular way. I did not completely disagree with his idea -- only in
the manner in which it was carried out. {xxxxxxxxxx} has described some of his work with Kenneth
Shoulders that involved something I think were called "electron clusters" (or something like that). He
said they had experimented with high voltage discharges with cone or annular-shaped electrodes (wetted
with water, I think it was). I seem to recall his mentioning that when fired, these bundles of electrons
would vaporize the material of any surface they impacted upon. But that was many years ago.

[Jack] Yes, but so what?

My idea was to combine both -- a cone-shaped electrode and an annular-shaped one. I patterned my
design, (or at least the one I supposed was utilized in the ARV) after what I had read in Nick Cook's The
Hunt for Zero Point, around page 192 (hardback edition). He described a secret project conducted by the
Nazis near the end of World War II called "The Bell". It used a solution of Mercury, Beryllium
Peroxide, and Thorium that was contained in 2 cylinders that spun in opposite directions.

This was very similar to the description of a UFO propulsion system described to me by an
individual back in 1989. In that instance, a Mercury-like metallic fluid was seen circulating upward
inside a 2-to-3 foot diameter glass tube that ran from floor-to-ceiling in the propulsion system room. It
rotated in one direction while at its base was a metallic disc rotated in the opposite direction. Around
the edge of the pit in the floor that this device was standing in, one could look across at the material
beneath the floor on the opposite side of this circular pit and see large copper-colored loops of wire
embedded in a clear solid material. This sounded remarkably like what {xxxxxxxxxx} had described
seeing at SkunkWorks and told to me by someone who knew nothing about {xxxxxxxxxxx}.

One witness claiming to be familiar with the process in the {xxxxxxxxxxx} told me that the
Beryllium Peroxide was used as a kind of "wetting agent" to keep the Mercury solution in contact with
the electrodes in spite of the high-voltage discharges. {xxxxxxxxxxxxx} suggested that the Thorium
was used to reduce the "threshhold of emission" as the solution became ionized. I also thought it
peculiar that the anode-cathode arrangement looked remarkably like the early X-ray machines and
wondered if they played a role in the operation of the circuit.

5
[Jack] Very interesting. But I still do not see any warp drive like you witnessed with zero-g force
from this.

In thinking of the system that the UFO witness had seen and the German apparatus, it seemed
obvious that the "solution" circulated down through the center of the column through the inner cylinder,
spinning in one direction while it also circulated back to the top between the inner cylinder and the outer
cylinder which rotated in the opposite direction. With a few angled vanes placed at the top of this
apparatus where the inner and outer fluid sections crossed over, one could impart a swirling flow to the
metallic liquid as it passed between the two electrodes. The cone-shaped anode being at the top center
of the outer cylinder mounted under its "cap" and the annular cathode would be mounted into the
opening of the inner cylinder. These vanes would look something like what one finds inside the torque
converter of an automobile.

I imagined that a powerful discharge of electricity between a cone-shaped anode and an annular-
shaped cathode spinning in opposite directions in a highly pressurized solution of Mercury, Beryllium
Peroxide, and Thorium. The idea being that upon firing a high voltage current between the spinning
anode and cathode inside the rotating central column with the solution circulating down through the
center of one concentric tube, a burst of ions shaped like a torus would travel through the length of the
inner cylinder. Because of the extreme pressure under which the solution was placed, the Mercury
solution could never vaporize. Thus acting like what I had visualized as a "virtual plasma".

[Jack] Very imaginative. But I still don't get it. Again, one needs a mathematical model using
mainstream physics.

Part of this action as I visualized it came from something I had observed while SCUBA diving.
When properly executed at depths of 15 feet -or-more, one can take a deep breath of compressed air
from the scuba second stage (mouthpiece) and -- upon removing it from your mouth -- sputter a sudden
burst of air from your mouth while looking straight up. It takes some practice. But if done properly, it
creates a perfect ring of compressed air that can be seen swirling in upon itself as it floats to the surface.

The toroid shape expands as it floats upward. And the cross-section of the torus of air thins out until
the cohesive actions of the air and water cause it to break into a set of sausage link shapes, still swirling
and still in a circular pattern as they move uniformly to the surface. I saw this kind of action occurring
in the central column, inner cylinder (albeit moving in a downward direction).

[Jack] OK. But how does this apply to the machine?

In one of {xxxxxxxxxx's} sketches that he did for {yyyyyyyyyy} when they met back in the early
1990's, {xxxxxxxxxxx} indicated that there was a third electrode-like system inside the inner cylinder.
This device actually looked more like a long, flexible, all-metal bottle brush that spiraled down through
the center of the inner cylinder. I suggest to you that this item is a "pickup" for the "cold current"
produced from the precessing and rotating torus of ions that fires out of the annular cathode inside the
inner cylinder.

6
 I don't pretend to understand how all of this works except that there are many overlapping aspects of
this system. For example, the powerful electromagnetic field generated by the primary windings of the
"Antenna Section" stroke vertically through the core of the central column. This may be significant in
the dynamics of the "virtual plasma" generated in the burst of high-voltage current between the anode
and cathode and reminded me of an anti-matter trap with the winding of the primary or secondary coils
outside the chamber.

Secondly, these same field lines created by the "Antenna Section" stroke horizontally through the
length of the plates in the "Capacitor Section". This occurs during the charge and discharge phases of
the circuit's operation.

In essence, what I am suggesting is that just like in the anti-matter trap, the electrons held in
potential in the dielectric and capacitor plates are aligned in "strands" that follow the field lines of the
primary windings. At the moment of charge and discharge, this would create a sort of rudimentary
"longitudinal wave" or "scalar wave" travelling the length of each capacitor section and within the
same plain as the capacitor array. I am not sure what kind of effect this might produce. But I think it is
a key point in understanding the dramatic acceleration and apparent loss of mass and inertia within the
craft.

[Jack] Noether's theorem above kills all this unless some kind of torsion field in the fabric of space
itself is generated.

I personally saw a craft of this type execute 2 right-angle turns while covering 9 miles of airspace in
under a 1½ seconds on December 13, 1989 just north of the Ontario International Airport over Rancho
Cucamonga at about 11:44 PM on that date. It produced no sonic boom. I roughly calculated that the
object, a brilliant, bluish-white sphere had to been travelling upwards of 12,000-to-14,000 miles-per-
hour. It was headed (just by coincidence) in the direction of Edwards AFB.

If I can clarify any of the above details, let me know....

William S. Alek
FREE ENERGY, Anti-Gravitational, and Time-Travel Technologies
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/intalek
INTALEK, INC. PHONE/FAX: 219.924.2742
3506-43rd. Place EMAIL: mailto:wsalek01@intalek.com
Highland, IN 46322 USA http://www.intalek.com

==================================================

http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1430

 On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:58:21 -0500, William Alek wrote:

>>
>> Hello all,
>>

7
 >> Inspired by Tim Ventura's of American Antigravity information about the NAZI Bell
Experiment, I decided to try a simple experiment. I managed to capture by photo what I call a
"Diagravitic Effect": http://www.intalek.com/Pictures/DiagraviticSystem.jpg
>>
>> Shown in this photo are two Gravitrons glued together and placed on a spring scale. These
Gravitrons are available at the Museum of Science and Industry:
>> http://www.roboticsonline.com/public/articles/archivedetails.cfm?id=1521
>>
>> What I discovered is an effect similar to diamagnetism. In diamagnetism, two
spinning/counter-spinning magnetic fields cancel each other such that the element has NO net
magnetic field. However, applying an external magnetic field to the spinning system causes the
element to produce a "counter-magnetic field". The element Bismuth has this property. I
observed a similar gravitational effect which I call "diagravitic" simply by spinning/counter-
spinning "non-magnetic" discs. The difference I observed -- though tiny -- is shown here:
>> http://www.intalek.com/Pictures/DiagraviticComparison.jpg
>>
>> The theory is that two spinning/counter-spinning discs produces a temporal effect which
generates a counter-gravitic force against gravity. This ISN'T anti-gravitational but instead a
counteracting or opposing gravitational force.
>>
>> I will be showing this experiment at next week's Tesla Tech show in Salt Lake City.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> ---
>> William S. Alek
>> FREE ENERGY, Antigravitational, and Time Travel Technologies
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/intalek
>>
>> INTALEK, INC. PHONE/FAX: 219.924.2742
>> 3506-43rd. Place EMAIL: mailto:wsalek01@intalek.com
>> Highland, IN 46322 USA HOME PAGE: http://www.intalek.com/

> From: Robert Neil Boyd

> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 7:37 AM
> Subject: Re: Diagravitic Systems and the NAZI Bell Experiment
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> You may recall, I predicted just such an effect on the Greenglow egroup about 5 years ago.
Thanks for doing the experiment. :) There is -- as I mentioned on Greenglow -- a critical velocity
involved of about 27,000 RPM where the effect will be magnified. Then if you arrange to charge the
rotating discs electrically to say 400KV, the resulting effects can be enormous based on Aether
theory. Also, the greater the masses involved, the larger the effect. But you need to be careful with
such high rotational velocities and such high voltages involved, needless to say.
>
> So what happened at Estes Park? Did you ever make it up there?
>
> :)
>
8
 > Neil

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:50:41 -0700, Tim Ventura wrote:

> Hi Neil --
>
> Well, you're in good company on that prediction although it would appear that some of the hidden-
constraints in engineering drive people towards using Mercury and/or plasmas for this type of effect.
However, while there is a DC component to this field, nearly all of the claims involve an AC-overlay
waveform of some type onto that DC baseline field.>

The real fun happens when you put high voltage DC on the discs in pulses with no AC components
whatsoever. No bounces or fluctuations. Just pure WHAPS of high voltage DC. Like smacking the
surface of a pond with your hand. Ideally, the DC input should conform to the Dirac delta function,
which is an infinitely high rise-time of an infinitely high voltage. An explosive electrical discharge.

At 100,000,000 volts DC, you reach the vacuum breakdown threshold where the "fabric of space" is
converted into an avalanche of energetic aether particle flux which carries nearby particles along for the
ride. Tesla had valid concerns that the avalanche of energy which arises at the vacuum breakdown
threshold could result in a torrent of continuous and growing energy of such immensity as to
dissociatively vanish the atoms comprising the atmosphere and to cause the Earth's crust to boil at the
point where the discharge met the planet's surface -- such results getting worse with the passage of time
-- as the avalanche gained in strength.

Fortunately for Telsa and for us, he found that the avalanche discharges resulting from impulse
voltages at 100MV DC were self-quenching, meeting with high resistance to the downpouring aether
flux in the form of electrons, which act to stem the rush of aether particles, and to convert portions of the
aether flood into prodigious volumes of ever more quantities of electrons.

The growing volume of electrons acted to choke off the cascading aether torrent, acting as
resistances to the horrendous volume of aether particles which threatened to literally split the Earth in
half.

So, the way the Universe is designed, these avalanche discharges are self-quenching -- contrary to
the strongly held views of some highly regarded scientists in the service of the DoD whose opinions
have led to some misguided repressions of important researches in these directions. To the misfortune
of all.

There is a way to attain the vacuum breakdown threshold without resorting to the massive and
expensive equipment which is normally required to generate 100 MV discharges. It has to do with the
enormous voltage gradients which exist at the scale of atomic lattices and intra-atomic interactions.
When somebody signs over a check and the deposit clears the bank, then I'll talk about it in some detail.
Until then, that's about as big a clue as you're going to get from me on this. Have fun! :)

Best Wishes,
Neil

9
http://www.mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=5717728&tstart=0

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Sarfatti [mailto:sarfatti@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:15 PM
To: Eric Julien; Nick Cook; noory George
Cc: Gordon Novel; Ronald Pandolfi; Mike Dignam; Mark Bush; Stanton Friedman; David Froning;
Mark Pesses; John Petersen; Dr. Don Altfeld; William Hamilton; Tim Ventura; Bob Shaheen;
Gary &amp, Val Esolen; George Uhlig;
frstdraw@aol.com; James Brannon; bruce maccabee; John Alexander; John Hutchison; Paul
Price; Brad Sorensen; David Sereda; Linda Moulton Howe; Ryan Wood; Kerry Cassidy; Ken
Kerber; Steve Tangherlina; Stephan A. Schwartz; Robert Wood; Jim Marrs; Hal Puthoff;
Wendelle Stevens; Amara D. Angelica; Tim Ventura; Alan Holt; Lisette Larkins; leon lisbona;
William Gazecki;
alison Savitch; Byron Belitsos; Lisa Pease; Tony Meldonian; Tony Cabot; David Michael;
Ramsey Clark; Dan Smith; Nat Kobitz; ross.perot@ps.net; Burt Rutan; Danny B. Catselas
Burisch, Sc.D.; John Lewis; Jim Hamill; Paul
Hellyer; bvr1001@msn.com; flyingwg@msn.com; Steven Saltzman; jschindler@bellsouth.net;
Tom T; Sharon Weinberger; Gary Bekkum; antigray; William Birnes; George Knapp; RAY
HUDSON; Dan Smith; caryn anscomb; Colin
Bennett; Philip Coppens; Mark Pilkington; Kit Green; Hal P; Eric Davis; S-P Sirag; Creon
Levit; Gennady Shipov; Vladimir Poponin; antigray; Russell Targ; Andrew Beckwith;
ROBERT BECKER; elizabeth Rauscher; James Woodward; art wagner;
ryguy@realityuncovered.com; Jerry Pippin; Sam Arnold; John Alexander

Subject: G. Noory & Sudden Epiphany on Nazi Bell Podkletnov UFO ARV Vortex Torsion Field
Propulsion

Descartes had a vortex theory competing with Newton's particle mechanics. Think of a planar
smoke ring. It is a vortex ring. The planar smoke ring spontaneously moves in the direction
perpendicular to its plane. This is a hydrodynamic Lorentz force effect where the vorticity (i.e., curl of
velocity) -- at least in the core -- is like a magnetic field with the vortex itself like a "charge" (ref. A. Zee
"Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" p.299).

In a superfluid, there will also be the nonlocal Bohm-Aharonov effect. But that's an advanced detail
tangential to my main point below. There is also a kind of Berry-phase Chern-Simons nonlocal
communication topological gauge field effect independent of clocks and measuring rods (non metrical).
Smething like George Noory's "mental internet" beyond space & time for remote viewing and nonlocal
mind.

Two straight vortices with same flow (e.g. clockwise) repel each other. And therefore there is an
effective torque (Lorentz force couple) on each of them from the others so that they simply circle each
other. But a vortex-antivortex pair -- one clockwise, one anti-clockwise -- move each other mutually in
the same direction. A smoke ring (closed planar vortex ring) is like spokes in a wheel with vortex-anti-
vortex pairs at the antipodal points on lines through the center of the ring.

Okay. Well can we make the torsion field version of a smoke ring on the rim of the flying disk?
The propellantless hovering motion would be analogous to the NASA 'Gravity B' gravimagnetic local
inertial frame (LIF) dragging from a whirlwind (e.g., Ezekial's vision of whirls within whirls) of the
fabric of space itself.

10
 Note the latter is not a torsion field effect. Torsion adds new effects beyond the 1915 GR effects.
However, we do not want precession of a gyroscope which is like the mutual circular motion of 2
vortices whirling in the same sense. We want the smoke ring effect.

The issue then is how the torsion vortex ring in the rim of the flying disk is generated. This is where
the alleged Nazi Bell experiment comes in. Some kind of MHD plasma in a torus configuration as
suggested by the <Joseph-Farrell-Interview.pdf> of Tim Ventura.

Jack Sarfatti

if on the Internet, Press <BACK> on your browser to return to

the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)
else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this
file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'

11