Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Less is more? Antibiotic duration and outcomes in


Fournier’s gangrene

Margaret Hedgecock Lauerman, MD, Olga Kolesnik, MD, Kinjal Sethuraman, MD,
Ronald Rabinowitz, MD, Manjari Joshi, MD, Emily Clark, MS, Deborah Stein, MD,
Thomas Scalea, MD, and Sharon Henry, MD, Baltimore, Maryland

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic management of Fournier’s gangrene (FG) is without evidence-based guidelines and is based on expert opinion. The ef-
fect of duration of antibiotic therapy on outcomes in FG is unknown.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of FG patients from 2012 to 2015 at a single institution. Patients were managed by our in-
stitutional practice of complete primary wound closure as possible, with antibiotic duration according to physician judgment. Pa-
tients were stratified into multiple durations of antibiotic administration.
RESULTS: Overall, 168 patients with FG were included. When examining multiple stratifications of antibiotic therapy of 7 days or less, 8 days
to 10 days, 11 days to 14 days, or 15 days or more of antibiotics, there was no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.11), primary
closure (p = 0.75), surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.52), or Clostridium difficile infection (p = 0.63). There were no cases of re-
current FG in any antibiotic stratification. Mortality was not increased (p = 1.00) and ability to achieve primary closure was not
decreased (p = 0.08) with initial antibiotic therapy exclusive of cultured organisms.
CONCLUSION: Shorter antibiotic courses for patients in whom source control is obtained and initial antibiotic selection exclusive of many resistant
organisms were not associated with worse outcomes in FG. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83: 443–448. Copyright © 2017
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.
KEY WORDS: Necrotizing fasciitis; Fournier’s gangrene; antibiotics.

F ournier’s gangrene (FG) is a serious diagnosis with mortality


ranging from 6% to 40%.1–15 Wide debridement is often re-
quired for local source control, and residual perineal wounds can
studies have examined duration of antibiotics in infections such
as intra-abdominal infections and ear infections, but unfortunately,
similar data do not exist for necrotizing soft tissue infections.27,28
be substantial. Patients with necrotizing infections often present Shorter courses of antibiotics generally reduce the risk of
with sepsis and organ dysfunction and can be critically ill.16,17 the development of antibiotic resistance and development of
Most prior research on necrotizing infections has focused on Clostridium difficile colitis.29,30 However, too short of an antibi-
predictors of mortality, with surgical factors such as spread of otic duration may place patients at risk for recurrent FG, SSI, or
disease and time to debridement associated with higher mortality.17,18 inability to achieve complete primary wound closure. The aim of
Long-term management of open wounds created with debride- this study was to investigate the effect of duration of antibiotic
ment of FG ranges from primary wound closure to healing by sec- therapy on outcomes in FG. We hypothesized that shorter dura-
ondary intention, skin grafting, and creation of fasciocutaneous tion antibiotic therapy would not be associated with increased
flaps. The optimal strategy associated with lowest mortality and mortality, increased rates of associated infections, or decreased
least morbidity has not been clearly identified.12–15,19–23 rates of primary closure.
The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in FG is simi-
larly poorly elucidated, as is the effect antibiotic duration has PATIENTS AND METHODS
on mortality and other outcomes, such as ability to achieve com-
plete primary wound closure, occurrence of surgical site infec- A retrospective review was performed at a single institu-
tion (SSI) and development of recurrent FG. Expert opinions tion, the University of Maryland Medical Center R Adams
for antibiotic duration in necrotizing infections guide clinical Cowley Shock Trauma Center, over a 3-year period from 2012
care,24–26 with continuation of antibiotics until the patient is to 2015. Institutional review board approval was obtained before
clinically well and debridements have been completed. Recent beginning the review. Only patients ages 18 years and older were
included. FG was defined as a necrotizing infection requiring
perineal debridement and was exclusive of patients who under-
went incision and drainage of a perineal abscess. Patients who
Submitted: February 6, 2017, Revised: March 20, 2017, Accepted: April 30, 2017,
Published online: Month May 22, 2017.
underwent perineal exploration for concern for FG without de-
From the Division of Trauma and Critical Care, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Cen- bridement were similarly excluded.
ter, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland. Patients with FG were managed according to our institu-
Address for reprints: Margaret Lauerman, MD, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, tional practice. Patients undergo sequential debridements, typically
22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; email: mlauerman@umm.edu.
every 48 hours or 72 hours until the perineal wound contains
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001562 only healthy, viable tissue. If possible when the debridements
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Volume 83, Number 3 443

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.


J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Lauerman et al. Volume 83, Number 3

are completed, the wound is managed with complete primary Overall, 28 (16.7%) patients received 7 days or less of an-
wound closure, defined as 100% apposition of the skin edges tibiotic therapy, 52 (30.1%) patients received 8 days to 10 days
of the wound. This focus on wound closure as the goal definitive of antibiotic therapy, 56 (33.3%) patients received 11 days to
wound management technique in all patients allows investiga- 14 days of antibiotic therapy, and 32 (19.0%) patients received
tion of complete primary wound closure as an outcome in FG. 15 days or more of antibiotic therapy (Fig. 1). Mean duration
Secondary intention healing was defined as management of a re- of antibiotic therapy was 11.6 days ± 6.14 days. There was no
sidual wound without complete closure of the wound. Patients significant difference in presenting physiology between patients
are referred for hyperbaric oxygen treatment, and focus is placed undergoing different durations of antibiotic therapy, with 3.6%,
on assuring adequate nutritional intake. 11.5%, 10.7%, and 12.5% (p = 0.65) of patients requiring pres-
Debridements were defined as those occurring at our insti- sor therapy on admission and 7.1%, 15.4%, 23.2%, and. 9.4%
tution only and were exclusive of debridements which occurred (p = 0.18) of patients requiring mechanical ventilation on admis-
at referring institutions. Sepsis and septic shock were defined sion, respectively. Sepsis on admission was common, occurring
according to the Sepsis-3 guidelines.31 Types I, II, and III bacte- in 32.1%, 59.6%, 53.6%, and 68.8%, (p = 0.03) of patients, with
rial infections were defined according to standard criteria, with septic shock less common on admission, occurring in 3.6%,
type I a polymicrobial infection, Type II a gram positive only 1.9%, 5.4%, and 6.3% (p = 0.75) of patients among the anti-
infection, and Type III a gram negative only infection.32 At our biotic groups (Table 1).
institution, antibiotic duration is not standardized but rather indi- The extent of infection was as well similar between antibi-
vidualized to each patient based on their clinical illness, ability otic groups, with no significant difference seen in rates of wounds
to achieve source control, and provider preference. However, isolated to the perineum (46.4% vs. 46.2% vs. 51.8% vs. 68.8%,
our infectious disease team often manages patients with FG in p = 0.20) or ability to achieve primary wound closure (35.7% vs.
conjunction with the surgical team, and antibiotic duration is de- 44.2% vs. 35.7% vs. 43.8%, p = 0.75) between the antibiotic
termined after discussion between the infectious disease and sur- groups. Similarly, for associated infections, rates of C. difficile co-
gical teams; patients with FG are not managed in completely litis infection (3.6% vs. 3.8% vs. 5.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.63) and SSI
closed units. For this study, antibiotic duration excluded antibi- (0% vs. 1.9% vs. 0% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.52) were not significantly
otics received at other institutions in patients who were trans- different between these antibiotic groups. Lastly, there was no sig-
ferred. Recurrent FG was defined as a recurrent necrotizing nificant difference in mortality (10.7% vs. 0% vs. 3.6% vs. 3.1%,
infection requiring debridement within 30 days of admission. p = 0.11) between these antibiotic groups (Table 2).
Time to final wound management was defined as time from ad- The mean time from final wound management to antibi-
mission to our institution until either wound closure or cessation otic cessation was 4.8 days ± 7.2 days. Mean time from final
of debridement. wound management to antibiotic cessation was not significantly
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24 lower in patients who died compared with those who did not
(IBM, Armonk, NY). Univariate analysis was performed exam- die (0.17 days vs. 4.93 days, p = 0.11), higher in patients with
ining frequencies of the study variables. Visual inspection was C. difficile infection compared to those without C. difficile infec-
used to assess for normality of antibiotic duration. Bivariate test- tion (2.17 days vs. 4.85 days, p = 0.37) or lower in patients with
ing was performed with t tests, analysis of variance, χ2, and SSI compared to those without an SSI (11.50 days vs. 4.67 days,
Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression was performed in a for- p = 0.19). Nineteen patients had their antibiotics stopped before
ward fashion for mortality including variables with significance final wound management.
of p < 0.20 on bivariate testing for association with mortality. Six (3.6%) patients were initially prescribed antibiotics that
Variance inflation factors (VIF) and χ2 test were used as regres- did not cover the organism ultimately cultured from the wound,
sion diagnostics. and these patients all required alteration in antibiotic therapy.
Bacteria not covered by initial antibiotic therapy included:

RESULTS
Overall 168 patients were included, with 93 (55.4%) pa-
tients younger than 60 years. Eighty (47.6%) patients had disease
spread beyond the perineum. Sixty-seven (39.9%) patients ulti-
mately underwent complete primary wound closure, and 101
(60.1%) underwent secondary intention healing as their defini-
tive wound management strategy. The admission mean Sequen-
tial Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 2.47 ± 3.04.
Seventeen (10.1%) patients required pressor administration on
admission, and 92 (54.8%) patients met sepsis criteria on admis-
sion. Medical comorbidities were common, with 105 (62.5%)
diabetic patients and 101 (60.1%) hypertensive patients, in addi-
tion to the 115 (68.5%) obese patients with a body mass index of
30 or greater. Six (3.6%) patients with FG died. C. difficile infec-
tion occurred in six (3.6%) patients, SSI in two (1.2%) patients, Figure 1. Frequency of the categories of antibiotic duration in
and recurrent FG did not occur in any patients. Fournier’s gangrene.

444 © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.


J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Volume 83, Number 3 Lauerman et al.

TABLE 1. Demographic, Physiologic, and Comorbidity Variables in Patients With Fournier’s Gangrene Stratified by Antibiotic Duration
7 Days or Less of 8–10 Days of 11–14 Days of 15 Days or More of
Antibiotics (n = 28) Antibiotics (n = 52) Antibiotics (n = 56) Antibiotics (n = 32) p
Demographics
Age: 60 years and older, N (%) 15 (53.6%) 24 (46.2%) 23 (41.1%) 13 (40.6%) 0.69
Male sex, N(%) 19 (67.9%) 41 (78.8%) 38 (67.9%) 27 (84.4%) 0.25
Race, N (%)
White 11 (39.3%) 38 (73.1%) 31 (55.4%) 22 (68.8%) 0.04
African American 16 (57.1%) 11 (21.2%) 20 (35.7%) 8 (25.0%)
Other 1 (3.6%) 3 (5.8%) 5 (8.9%) 1 (3.1%)
Unknown 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (3.1%)
Outside hospital transfer, n (%) 26 (92.9%) 48 (92.3%) 56 (100%) 31 (96.9%) 0.19
Outside hospital operation, n (%) 8 (28.6%) 17 (32.7%) 20 (35.7%) 8 (25.0%) 0.75
Physiology on admission
Pressors, n (%) 1 (3.6%) 6 (11.5%) 6 (10.7%) 4 (12.5%) 0.65
Ventilator, n (%) 2 (7.1%) 8 (15.4%) 12 (23.2%) 3 (9.4%) 0.18
Heart rate, mean ± SD 98.54 ± 18.24 93.67 ± 17.38 100.61 ± 22.91 98.75 ± 16.75 0.31
Systolic blood pressure, mean ± SD 128.75 ± 23.87 129.02 ± 22.54 127.59 ± 22.17 130.59 ± 25.64 0.95
SOFA score, mean ± SD 1.50 ± 2.03 2.63 ± 3.03 2.52 ± 3.00 2.97 ± 3.75 0.28
Sepsis, n (%) 9 (32.1%) 31 (59.6%) 30 (53.6%) 22 (68.8%) 0.03
Septic shock, n (%) 1 (3.6%) 1 (1.9%) 3 (5.4%) 2 (6.3%) 0.75
Lactate, mean ± SD 1.92 ± 1.01 1.76 ± 0.66 2.04 ± 1.79 1.98 ± 0.84 0.70
WBC, mean ± SD 16.63 ± 7.92 18.06 ± 7.94 17.20 ± 8.03 15.45 ± 6.89 0.51
Creatinine, mean ± SD 1.56 ± 1.60 1.83 ± 1.55 1.75 ± 2.26 1.59 ± 1.09 0.89
Comorbidities
Hypertension, n (%) 16 (57.1%) 34 (65.4%) 34 (60.7%) 17 (53.1%) 0.71
Hyperlipidemia, n (%) 12 (42.9%) 19 (36.5%) 18 (32.1%) 7 (21.9%) 0.35
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 18 (64.3%) 36 (69.2%) 34 (60.7%) 17 (53.1%) 0.51
HIV, n (%) 1 (3.6%) 2 (3.8%) 3 (5.4%) 0 (0%) 0.63
Chronic kidney disease, n (%) 2 (7.1%) 8 (15.4%) 7 (12.5%) 2 (6.3%) 0.52
COPD, n (%) 3 (10.7%) 10 (19.2%) 2 (3.6%) 3 (9.4%) 0.07
Congestive heart failure, n (%) 1 (3.6%) 6 (11.5%) 4 (7.1%) 1 (3.1%) 0.42
BMI≥30, n (%) 16 (57.1%) 41 (78.8%) 37 (66.1%) 21 (65.6%) 0.21
BMI, body mass index; N, number; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in three patients, Klebsiella with mortality, including antibiotic duration. χ2 Test indicated
in one patient, and Escherichia coli in two patients. Initial anti- good model fit, and all VIF were less than 10, with a mean
biotic therapy not covering the bacteria ultimately cultured in- VIF 1.39.
cluded: clindamycin, vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam
in two patients; vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam in DISCUSSION
two patients; linezolid and piperacillin-tazobactam in one patient;
and vancomycin, ertapenem and metronidazole in one patient. In FG, antibiotic duration is quite varied in clinical prac-
Mortality rates (0% vs. 3.7%, p = 1.00) and rates of complete tice. After stratifying antibiotic duration into subgroups, there
primary wound closure (0% vs. 41.1%, p = 0.08) were not sig- was no association seen with shorter antibiotic courses and
nificantly different in patients with inadequate initial antibiotic multiple outcome measures, including complete primary wound
therapy when compared with patients whose initial antibiotic closure, SSI, C. difficile infection, and mortality. There is no
therapy was adequate. high-grade evidence to define the optimal duration of antibiotic
Given the potential for confounding variables, logistic re- therapy, unlike other infections, such as ear infections or intra-
gression was performed for factors associated with mortality in abdominal infections,27,28 and duration of antibiotic therapy in
bivariate analysis, including: lactate, white blood cell (WBC) FG is therefore based on expert opinion.24–26
count, SOFA score, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, human Surgical management of FG at the R Adams Cowley
immunodeficiency virus, chronic kidney disease, sepsis, wounds Shock Trauma Center occurs in a standardized fashion, focusing
isolated to the perineum, and antibiotic duration (data not shown). on complete primary wound closure as the optimal definitive
In logistic regression, WBC (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence in- wound management strategy, with secondary intention healing
terval, 0.78–0.99; p = 0.03) and lactate (odds ratio, 1.93; 95% for residual wounds if complete primary wound closure is not
confidence interval, 1.26–2.96; p = 0.003) were significantly as- achievable. Flap creation and early skin graft placement are
sociated with mortality. All other variables were not associated not routinely pursued outside of specific indications, such as

© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 445

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.


J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Lauerman et al. Volume 83, Number 3

TABLE 2. Operative Variables and Outcomes for Patients With Fournier’s Gangrene Stratified by Antibiotic Duration
7 Days or Less of 8–10 Days of 11–14 Days of 15 Days or More of
Antibiotics (n = 28) Antibiotics (n = 52) Antibiotics (n = 56) Antibiotics (n = 32) p
Bacterial type
Type I, n (%) 17 (60.7%) 34 (65.4%) 34 (60.7%) 25 (78.1%) 0.41
Type II, n (%) 4 (14.3%) 11 (21.2%) 13 (23.2%) 5 (15.6%)
Type III, n (%) 1 (3.6%) 1 (1.9%) 0 (0%) 1 (3.1%)
Cultures negative, n (%) 1 (3.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
No cultures, n (%) 5 (17.9%) 6 (11.5%) 9 (16.1%) 1 (3.1%)
Operative variables
Wound isolated to perineum, n (%) 13 (46.4%) 24 (46.2%) 29 (51.8%) 22 (68.8%) 0.20
Complete primary wound closure, n (%) 10 (35.7%) 23 (44.2%) 20 (35.7%) 14 (43.8%) 0.75
Colostomy, n (%) 5 (17.9%) 4 (7.7%) 8 (14.3%) 4 (12.5%) 0.57
Total debridements, mean ± SD 2.18 ± 0.98 2.63 ± 0.93 2.68 ± 1.03 2.97 ± 1.33 0.04
Outcomes
Mortality, n (%) 3 (10.7%) 0 (0%) 2 (3.6%) 1 (3.1%) 0.11
Clostridium difficile infection, n (%) 1 (3.6%) 2 (3.8%) 3 (5.4%) 0 (0%) 0.63
Recurrent FG, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) —
SSI, n (%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.9%) 0 (0%) 1 (3.1%) 0.52

for coverage of a concurrent urinary fistula, although they re- likelihood of wound closure or increasing the likelihood of
main options.12–15,19–23 spread of the infection. Our rate of C. difficile infection despite
Antibiotic therapy at our institution is generally initiated the sometimes protracted courses of antibiotics in FG was quite
with broad-spectrum antibiotics covering gram positive (includ- low, and duration of antibiotics does not seem to influence devel-
ing methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus), Gram-negative, opment of C. difficile infection in this patient cohort.
and anaerobic organisms, with alterations for patient allergies Rates of SSI in FG are poorly defined in the literature,
or if cultures from the referral institution are already available. with closure of these previously infected wounds created by
If there is concern for toxin production, clindamycin is added, FG debridement potentially placing patients at risk for SSI.
and consideration given to intravenous immunoglobulin. Once One downside of shorter courses of antibiotics is potentially an
cultures are available, antibiotics are narrowed to cover only or- increased rate of SSI; however, despite the complete primary
ganisms isolated in operative cultures. closure of wounds in approximately one third of patients in this
Depending on provider preference, patients either receive review, the rate of SSI occurrence was quite low overall and in all
a set course of antibiotic therapy, such as a 14-day course of an- antibiotic duration stratifications.
tibiotics, or have their antibiotics stopped after surgical source Another potential downside of shorter courses of antibi-
control has been obtained and they have clinically improved, otic therapy is recurrent FG if the initial infection is undertreated
without a set-course of therapy. In this review, patients with with antibiotics. In this analysis, no cases of recurrent FG were
shorter antibiotic durations most likely had antibiotics stopped seen with any antibiotic duration. With a surgical strategy incor-
after source control was obtained and clinical improvement porating serial debridements until the wound is clear of infection
was seen, rather than undergoing a set course of therapy. and necrotic tissue, and judicious use of antibiotics, recurrent
Necrotizing infections may encompass a significant body FG seems to be an infrequent occurrence.
surface area.17 One potential concern with using shorter courses For most patients with FG, our broad initial antibiotic se-
of antibiotics in FG is that the infection could spread farther lection practices provided adequate coverage for bacteria ulti-
than with longer antibiotic courses, decreasing ability to achieve mately cultured from the wound. However, a small percentage
complete primary wound closure and leaving patients with of patients had operative cultures remarkable for organisms re-
larger wounds. However, rapid surgical source control is a tenet sistant to the initial antibiotics chosen. A significant mortality
of FG treatment, and patients in this review had source control increase was not seen in patients with inadequate initial antibi-
obtained in two to three operative debridements. Likely due to otic coverage, although none of these patients had complete
this quick provision of source control, neither an increase of primary wound closure. Given the number of patients in this
spread of infection beyond the perineum nor a decrease in rate cohort, it is not possible to determine whether this low rate of
of complete primary wound closure with shorter courses of anti- complete primary wound closure was due to initially narrow an-
biotics was seen, and shorter courses of antibiotics in FG do not tibiotic coverage, is a reflection of a more severe infection, or is
seem to be associated with disease extension. due to another unmeasured factor. Beginning antibiotic coverage
C. difficile infections are common in necrotizing infec- in all patients with FG inclusive of resistant organisms identified
tions,17 with duration of antibiotic therapy associated with the in only 3.6% of patients would result in over treatment of a sig-
development of C. difficile infection overall.29 A shorter course nificant number of patients. Given the low mortality seen, this
of antibiotics may decrease a patient's risk of developing this po- is difficult to justify. Reserving non–first-line antibiotic agents
tentially fatal hospital-acquired infection without decreasing the to patients with culture proven resistant infections seems the

446 © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.


J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Volume 83, Number 3 Lauerman et al.

most appropriate approach to antibiotic stewardship in patients contributed to the study design, data collection, data interpretation, and
with FG. critical revision. K.S. contributed to the data interpretation and critical re-
vision. R.R. contributed to the study design, data interpretation, and crit-
A critical question for antibiotic duration in FG is the du- ical revision. M.J. contributed to the study design, data interpretation, and
ration of antibiotics required after wound management is com- critical revision. E.C. contributed to the study design and critical revision.
pleted. In this review there was no significant association of D.S. contributed to the data interpretation and critical revision. T.S. contrib-
SSI, C. difficile infection, or mortality with time from final wound uted to the study design, data interpretation, and critical revision. S.H.
management to cessation of antibiotics, and many patients had contributed to the study design, data interpretation, and critical revision.
their antibiotics stopped even before definitive wound manage- DISCLOSURE
ment. Antibiotics can likely be quickly stopped when surgical
Conflicts of Interest and Sources of Funding: M.L. is ATOX study sub-
source control is obtained, even if definitive wound management investigator. O.K. has nothing to disclose. K.S. has nothing to disclose.
has not been completed, although prospective research will be R.R. is Allergan speakers bureau. M.J. is Pfizer consultancy and ATOX study
required however to determine the optimal duration of antibiotic subinvestigator, DOD grants. E.C. has nothing to disclose. D.S. has noth-
therapy after source control is obtained as source control is a dif- ing to disclose. T.S. has nothing to disclose. S.H. is ATOX study site pri-
mary investigator.
ficult variable to accurately evaluate retrospectively. Funding: None from NIH, Welcome Trust, or HHMI.
Limitations of this review include its retrospective nature.
We are unable to account for effects of factors not included in
REFERENCES
this dataset. While this review included a large number of pa-
1. Saffle JR, Morris SE, Edelman L. Fournier's gangrene: management at a re-
tients for a single-institution study given the rarity of FG, the gional burn center. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(1):196–203.
overall small patient population makes type II error possible. 2. Altarac S, Katusin D, Crnica S, Papes D, Rajkovic Z, Arslani N. Fournier's
Many of the outcomes of FG, including SSI, recurrent FG, and gangrene: etiology and outcome analysis of 41 patients. Urol Int. 2012;
mortality are rare. Operations at referral institutions and antibi- 88(3):289–293.
otics given at referral institutions were not included given that 3. Sorensen MD, Krieger JN, Rivara FP, Klein MB, Wessells H. Fournier's gan-
grene: management and mortality predictors in a population based study.
full medical records from referral institutions were not always J Urol. 2009;182(6):2742–2747.
available, and may underestimate the total debridements per- 4. Czymek R, Kujath P, Bruch HP, Pfeiffer D, Nebrig M, Seehofer D,
formed and duration of antibiotics. Although this study focuses Guckelberger O. Treatment, outcome and quality of life after Fournier's gan-
on the outcomes of patients with FG, the effect of development grene: a multicentre study. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(12):1529–1536.
of multi-drug resistant pathogens in both the FG patients and 5. Palvolgyi R, Kaji AH, Valeriano J, Plurad D, Rajfer J, de Virgilio C. Fournier's
other patients in the hospital is unknown. Although multiple gangrene: a model for early prediction. Am Surg. 2014;80(10):926–931.
6. Lin TY, Ou CH, Tzai TS, Tong YC, Chang CC, Cheng HL, Yang WH, Lin
clinical outcomes were investigated in this study, another impor- YM. Validation and simplification of Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index.
tant factor with antibiotic duration will be cost and should be an Int J Urol. 2014;21(7):696–701.
avenue of future research. Additionally, the rationale for stop- 7. Dahm P, Roland FH, Vaslef SN, Moon RE, Price DT, Georgiade GS, Vieweg
ping antibiotics is often not available, with clinical variables J. Outcome analysis in patients with primary necrotizing fasciitis of the male
such as WBC, temperature, and hemodynamics often influenc- genitalia. Urology. 2000;56(1):31–35; discussion 35–6.
ing that decision. 8. Kim SY, Dupree JM, Le BV, Kim DY, Zhao LC, Kundu SD. A contemporary
analysis of Fournier gangrene using the National Surgical Quality Improve-
With a mean duration of antibiotics of almost 12 days re- ment Program. Urology. 2015;85(5):1052–1056.
ported in this study, the courses of antibiotics for FG in this study 9. Göktaş C, Yıldırım M, Horuz R, Faydacı G, Akça O, Cetinel CA. Factors
may be overall longer than what is often prescribed in clinical affecting the number of debridements in Fournier's gangrene: our results in
practice at many high-volume centers. Antibiotics are often 36 cases. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012;18(1):43–48.
stopped after source control is obtained, and the patient has clin- 10. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Fujimura T, Ohe K, Matsuda S,
Fushimi K, Homma Y. Impact of surgical intervention timing on the case fa-
ically improved, but, in this retrospective review, patients may tality rate for Fournier's gangrene: an analysis of 379 cases. BJU Int. 2012;
have undergone longer courses of antibiotics for concurrent in- 110(11 Pt C):E1096–E1100.
fections rather than for FG (such as osteomyelitis or bacteremia). 11. Martinschek A, Evers B, Lampl L, Gerngross H, Schmidt R, Sparwasser C.
It is unknown whether patients receiving longer courses of anti- Prognostic aspects, survival rate, and predisposing risk factors in patients
biotics would have had worse outcomes with shorter courses with Fournier's gangrene and necrotizing soft tissue infections: evaluation
of clinical outcome of 55 patients. Urol Int. 2012;89(2):173–179.
of antibiotics. However, without these longer courses of antibi- 12. Ayan F, Sunamak O, Paksoy SM, Polat SS, As A, Sakoglu N, Cetinkale O,
otics, comparison to shorter courses of antibiotics would not Sirin F. Fournier's gangrene: a retrospective clinical study on forty-one pa-
be feasible. tients. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(12):1055–1058.
Patients with FG often present with concurrent medical 13. Ghnnam WM. Fournier's gangrene in Mansoura Egypt: a review of 74 cases.
comorbidities, sepsis, and organ dysfunction. In this retrospec- J Postgrad Med. 2008;54(2):106–109.
tive study, shorter courses of antibiotics were not associated with 14. Yanar H, Taviloglu K, Ertekin C, Guloglu R, Zorba U, Cabioglu N, Baspinar
I. Fournier's gangrene: risk factors and strategies for management. World J
worse outcomes, including C. difficile infection, SSI, and mor- Surg. 2006;30(9):1750–1754.
tality, although these outcomes were all quite rare. Current anti- 15. Ersay A, Yilmaz G, Akgun Y, Celik Y. Factors affecting mortality of Fournier's
biotic selection practices which exclude resistant gram negative gangrene: review of 70 patients. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(1–2):43–48.
bacteria and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus appear valid 16. Mills MK, Faraklas I, Davis C, Stoddard GJ, Saffle J. Outcomes from treat-
as well. ment of necrotizing soft-tissue infections: results from the National Surgical
Quality Improvement Program database. Am J Surg. 2010;200(6):790–796;
discussion 796–7.
AUTHORSHIP
17. Elliott DC, Kufera JA, Myers RA. Necrotizing soft tissue infections. Risk
M.L. contributed to the literature search, study design, data collec- factors for mortality and strategies for management. Ann Surg. 1996;224(5):
tion, data analysis, data interpretation, writing, and critical revision. O.K. 672–683.

© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 447

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.


J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Lauerman et al. Volume 83, Number 3

18. McHenry CR, Piotrowski JJ, Petrinic D, Malangoni MA. Determinants 26. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Everett ED, Dellinger P, Goldstein EJ,
of mortality for necrotizing soft-tissue infections. Ann Surg. 1995;221(5): Gorbach SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan EL, Montoya JG, et al. Practice guide-
558–563; discussion 563–5. lines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections.
19. Ferreira PC, Reis JC, Amarante JM, Silva AC, Pinho CJ, Oliveira IC, da Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(10):1373–1406.
Silva PN. Fournier's gangrene: a review of 43 reconstructive cases. Plast 27. Sawyer RG, Claridge JA, Nathens AB, Rotstein OD, Duane TM, Evans HL,
Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(1):175–184. Cook CH, O'Neill PJ, Mazuski JE, Askari R, et al. Trial of short-course an-
20. Eskitaşcıoğlu T, Özyazgan I, Coruh A, Günay GK, Altıparmak M, Yontar Y, timicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;
Doğan F. Experience of 80 cases with Fournier's gangrene and “trauma” as a 372(21):1996–2005.
trigger factor in the etiopathogenesis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014; 28. Hoberman A, Paradise JL, Rockette HE, Kearney DH, Bhatnagar S, Shope
20(4):265–274. TR, Martin JM, Kurs-Lasky M, Copelli SJ, Colborn DK, et al. Shortened an-
timicrobial treatment for acute otitis media in young children. N Engl J Med.
21. Eswara JR, McDougal WS. Long-term outcomes of surgical management
2016;375(25):2446–2456.
for nonmalignant perineal disease. J Urol. 2013;190(6):2139–2143.
29. Stevens V, Dumyati G, Fine LS, Fisher SG, van Wijngaarden E. Cumulative
22. Ahn DK, Kim SW, Park SY, Kim YH. Reconstructive strategy and classifi- antibiotic exposures over time and the risk of Clostridium difficile infection.
cation of penoscrotal defects. Urology. 2014;84(5):1217–1222. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(1):42–48.
23. Sallami S, Maalla R, Gammoudi A, Ben Jdidia G, Tarhouni L, Horchani A. 30. Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon JY, Chevret S, Thomas F, Wermert D, Clementi E,
Fournier's gangrene : what are the prognostic factors? Our experience with Gonzalez J, Jusserand D, Asfar P, et al. Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of anti-
40 patients. Tunis Med. 2012;90(10):708–714. biotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized
24. Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: diagnosis and trial. JAMA. 2003;290(19):2588–2598.
management. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(5):705–710. 31. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D,
25. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, et al.
SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan SL, Montoya JG, Wade JC, et al. Practice guide- The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock
lines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810.
2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect 32. Morgan MS. Diagnosis and management of necrotising fasciitis: a multi-
Dis. 2014;59(2):e10–e52. parametric approach. J Hosp Infect. 2010;75(4):249–257.

448 © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like