Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mcclelland'S Need Theory: Mcclelland'S Need Theory States That People Are Either Motivated by Need For Achievement
Mcclelland'S Need Theory: Mcclelland'S Need Theory States That People Are Either Motivated by Need For Achievement
McClelland’s Need Theory States that people are either motivated by need for achievement
, power or affiliation . A large part of what motivates a person depends on the culture and
environment he has been brought up in . Thus our analysis of Sachin’s career decision shows
the following
HE was constantly motivated by his brothers as a child . while his eldest brother influenced
him into building computers as a child , his middle brother constantly pushed him to
performing better as an athlete. Further Sachin did his early schooling in a very small
elementary school where everyone knew every one , making it important to him that he be
known to others . Thus we see that Sachin also internalised setting goal and achieving them
and that he enjoyed being known to others .The fact that both his brothers graduated from
an Ivey League college would have further influenced him into adopting the idea of setting
and achieving goals as a way of life
Thus linking with McClelland’s theory needs we can conclude that Sachin was largely
motivated by Need for achievement and Need for affiliation. This is further evidenced by
the below extracts from the case
Alderfer’s ERG Theory states that for one to be motivated have satisfaction at work three
needs need to be satisfied: Existence Needs, Relatedness Needs, and Growth Needs.
Existence Needs:
Sachin was from a well to do family and highly educated with a scholarship thus his basic
existence needs were satisfied
Relatedness Needs:
Sachin Made efforts to stay connected to his extended family and tied himself to the
identity of Indian American . He moved away from pure research as he figured out that he
was a peoples person and that he felt lonely sitting in office . Most importantly he made a
very important career decision by choosing to opt out of the Oxford program and choosing
to go to the Med school as his girl friend lived in Boston , the same place as his Med school
. This show hoe important Relatedness need was for Sachin.
Growth Needs:
Sachin had very strong growth needs . when he realized that his med school was not giving
much importance to health care policy, it effected him as he questioned the
meaningfulness of his efforts in doing the program . He addressed this by collaborating
with his class mate to get the commonwealth funding for creating website that intended to
improve the healthcare policy literacy of the medical students . This shows his need for
growth was high
Clarity of goals:
Sachin had discovered early on , what his interest were. This is evidenced by how he spent
all his project time as a government major at Harvard , in doing projects with a public policy
bend . This shows that he had clarity of what he wanted to do very early on in his career.
Challenge:
Sachin was consistently selected for the top schools in medicine and business domains. He
set himself high targets that he could achieve , but over the years learnt that there were
many ways to achieve success and let a plethora of options for his future
Commitment:
Sachin followed his love for public policy , especially healthcare public policy right from his
time as a government major to making the decision to go to med school to finally doing an
MBA and working with Michael Porter in the health care domain in his second year of MBA.
Feedback:
Sachin constantly reached out to prominent names for help and feedback throughout his
career so far . For example while he was making his decision about opting his degree
program he consulted NYU medical school’s associate dean to choose the school that better
aligned with his goals . He also received feedback from Don after his internship and it was
Don who prompted him to go to Med school . Thus we see feedbacks were an important
part of shaping his career.