Analysis and Modeling of Residential Building (G+22) Using Project Information Management Platform Incorporating ETABS & REVIT

Analysis and Modeling of Residential Building (G+22)
using Project Information Management Platform

Incorporating ETABS & REVIT
Project by:
SHAIKH ZIYAULHAQUE ABDUL HAQUE (13CE59)
ANSARI ABDUL MOIZ ABDUL KALAM (14DCE65)
ANSARI MEHDI HASAN IQBAL AHMED (14DCE66)
ANSARI MOHD SHAMSHAD ABDUL QAYYUM (14DCE68)
BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Under the Guidance of

Prof. SIDDIQUI MOHAMMED JUNAID
ANJUMAN-I-ISLAM’S KALSEKAR TECHNICAL CAMPUS

PLOT NO 2 &3, SECTOR 16, NEAR THANA NAKA, KHANDAGAON,
NEW PANVEL, NAVI MUMBAI-410206
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
ACADEMIC YEAR:
2016-2017
[Type the document title]
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the report titled “Analysis and Modeling of Residential Building
(G+22) using Project Information Management Platform Incorporating ETABS &
REVIT” Submitted by Shaikh Ziyaulhaque Abdul Haque (13CE59),Ansari Abdul Moiz
Abdul Kalam (14DCE65),Ansari Mehdi Hasan Iqbal Ahmed (14DCE66),Ansari Mohd
Shamshad Abdul Qayyum (14DCE68), in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the
degree of Bachelor Of Engineering In Civil Engineering, is a record of his work carried out in
Department Of Civil Engineering of this institute.
PROF. SIDDIQUI MOHAMMED JUNAID

GUIDE
DR. RAJENDRA B. MAGAR

Professor and Head of Civil Engg. Dept.
[Type text] Page 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………
1.1 AIM AND OBJECTIVES………………………………………

1.2 SCOPE………………………………………………………….
2.0 REVIEW OF LITERATURE……………………………………….
2.1 ETABS………………………………………………………….
2.2 Revit…………………………………………………………….
3.0 METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………..
4.0 REFERENCE………………………………………………………..
[Type text] Page 3

1. INTRODUCTION
India is a developing country; huge construction projects are yet to come as undeveloped
cities are needed to develop since so many years. In current century, many construction
projects all over the world are going, time delay takes place which in turn affects the growth
of the construction of huge projects. To avoid time delay and thereby the growth, economic
construction methodology should be adopted. To economize the structure, structural
optimization techniques should be used.
For large projects, it is necessary to go for structural optimization because it directly affects
cost of construction. Many Metropolitan cities are facing vast growth of infrastructure
whether it may be in terms of horizontal development or vertical development. Metropolitan
cities like Delhi and Mumbai have high population and in forth coming years’ land
availability problems will increase tremendously which will in turn affect the overall growth
of the city, so most of the builders in construction industries prefers vertical development of
structures. As we increase number of stories or height of structure, huge lateral forces come
into picture which will tend to increase the construction cost of the project in terms of
consumption of steel, concrete and such other materials. Hence usually optimization
techniques are adopted to economize the structure. New and different approaches to design
have become possible through the increased speed of computers and software tools of
optimization theory. The optimization exercise commences right from the architectural
concept stage. Suggested grid dimensions by architecture usually do not result into most
economical structural member sizes and reinforcement consumption. In general optimization
includes discretization of a whole structure into a series of sub frames with slab, beams,
columns and footings. The main parameters involved in the investigation of this project are
fundamental time, base shear, volume of reinforcement and volume of concrete. These
parameters are indirectly indicating the cost effectiveness of the individual technique and
there by the structure.
In 21st century, owing headed for massive inhabitants the numbers of areas in units are
diminishing gradually. Few years sponsor the populations were not so vast as a result they
used to stay in horizontal co-ordination system (due to large area available per person),
however at the present days’ people preferring vertical co-ordination System (high-rise
[Type text] Page 4

building due to deficiency of area). In high-rise buildings, we should concern about all the
forces that act on a building, its weight as well as the soil behavior. For external forces that
perform on the edifice beam, column, and reinforcement supposed to be good enough to
counteract these forces lucratively. The soil ought to be superior enough to distributing the
load effectively to the establishment. For loose soil, we preferred deep foundation (pile).
Calculation for a high-rise construction manually then it will take extra time in addition to
human individual errors possibly will be occurred. Consequently, the use of ETABS
(Extended Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems) and Revit will make it easy.
Structural analysis is the determination of the effects of loads on physical structures and their
components. Structures subject to this type of analysis include all that must withstand loads,
such as buildings, bridges, etc. Structural analysis employs the fields of applied mechanics,
materials science and applied mathematics to compute a structure's deformations, internal
forces, stresses, support reactions, accelerations and stability. The results of the analysis are
used to verify a structure's fitness for use, often precluding physical tests. Structural analysis
is thus a key part of the engineering design of structures.
ETABS offers a single user interface to perform: Modeling, Analysis, Design, Detailing, and
Reporting. A new model explorer is available for quick access to objects, properties, and
forms. ETABS has a wide selection of templates for quickly starting a new model. At this
model template stage, the user can define grid and grid spacing, the number of stories, the
default structural system sections, default slab and drop panel sections, and uniform loads
(specifically dead and live loads).
Modelling (or three-dimensional modelling) is the process of developing a mathematical

representation of any three-dimensional surface of an object (either inanimate or living) via
specialized software. The product is called a 3D model. It can be displayed as a two-
dimensional image through a process called 3D rendering.
Revit is a software application that supports a BIM (Building Information Modeling)

workflow from concept to construction. Use Revit to model designs with precision, optimize
performance and collaborate more effectively. From the outset, Revit was intended to allow
architects and other building professionals to design and document a building by creating a
parametric three-dimensional model that included both the geometry and non-geometric
design and construction information (quantities of steel and other materials).
[Type text] Page 5

1.1. AIM AND OBJECTIVE
At present ETABS and Revit are the leading designing and modelling software in the market.
We are analysing our structure using ETABS and modelling it done on Revit. By analysis on
ETABS we studied various forces and factors affecting on the structure. By Revit we get the
3D model of structure, quantities of steel and other materials.
1.2. SCOPE
Based on the aim and the objective mentioned in the preceding sections, the scope of the
present investigation is outline as under: -
1. By doing this project we will come to know some software of civil engineering related to
design and analysis of structures like ETABS and Revit.
2. By using Revit software we learn the estimation of materials in our structure forward by the
valuation of the project.
[Type text] Page 6

2. REVIEW OF LITRATURE
2.1. ETABS
AbhayGuleria (2014) presents the analysis of the multistoried building using ETABS
reflected that the storey overturning moment varies inversely with storey height. Moreover, L-
shape, I- shape type buildings give almost similar response against the overturning moment.
Storey drift displacement increased with storey height up to 6th storey reaching to maximum
value and then started decreasing. From dynamic analysis, mode shapes are generated and it
can be concluded that asymmetrical plans undergo more deformation than symmetrical plans.
Asymmetrical plans should be adopted considering into gap.
Arpit A. Bhusar and Ashish R. Akhare (2014) shows Building information models let
structural engineers design, visualize, simulate, analyze, document and build projects more
efficiently, accurately, and competitively. Among the most important benefits of BIM for
structural engineer are productivity, coordination and consistency of data, and improved
visualization and simulation of problems and situations. Structural engineers can easily spend
more time coordinating a project than performing the structural analysis. With the use of
BIM, the time spent in coordination is reduced, allowing structural engineers to focus all their
efforts in solving problems, instead of having to constantly be checking for errors or
coordinating changes made.
Sonia Longjam et.al. (2014) publishes the paper that presents the plan, model, analyze and
design of a vertical irregular shopping mall structure of G+10 storey and investigate its
performance under various lateral loading conditions. The main goal is to assess current
Indian Standard design practice and to provide design guidelines using ETABS, presents the
manual design calculation satisfying the necessary requirements as per BIS specification as
well as various Indian standard code specifications.
D.Ramya and A.V.S. Sai Kumar (2015), principle objective of the project is comparative
study on design and analysis of multistoried building (G+10) by STAAD Pro and ETABS
software. STAAD Pro is one of the leading software for the design of structures. G+10
Page 7
building is analyzed for finding the shear forces, bending moments, deflections
&reinforcement details for the structural components of building (such as Beams, columns &
slabs) to develop the economic design. ETABS is also a leading design software in present
days used by many structural designers. Analyzed the same structure using ETABS software
for the design. Finally, an attempt to define the economical section of G+10 multistoried
building using both STAAD Pro and ETABS comparatively. By the intensive study come to
know that the “economical sections” was developed using ETABS software.
S. VijayaBhaskar Reddy et. al. (2015), published a paper which describes the salient features
of ETABS (i.e., Extended Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems) and its various
applications in civil engineering. In this paper, using E tabs software the analysis of two multi
storied buildings is carried out with different heights (15m and 10m). Thus, it can help the
consulting engineers, construction experts, research scientists and students in the analysis of
concrete structures. The essential feature of ETABS is explained and the capability of the
important concepts of effective memory management, plot options and user interface are
described.
B.Anjaneyulu et.al. (2016), studies the analysis and design of Flat Slab by Using ETABS
Software, concludes that flat plate/slab can be designed and built either by conventional
reinforced concrete or posttensioning. However, due to issues mentioned above with post-
tensioning construction in India and its higher cost, conventional reinforced concrete design
should be preferred choice for spans up to 10 meters.
2.2. REVIT
AjlaAksamija et. al. (2011), Parametric design offers some advantages over traditional
modeling methods, since it allows adaptation of an object by rules and constraints or
“parameters” to influence the object’s properties. These processes as well as parametric
computational tools, are relatively new in architectural design. They enable the adaptation of
model geometry based on rules or data values, eliminating the need to recreate the model for
every design change. Cesar Augusto Hunt (2013), the benefits of using building information
modeling are evident, especially when analyzing the way that this methodology enhances the
Page 8
structural design workflow. Engineers are realizing the power of BIM for more efficient and
intelligent design, and most firms using BIM are reporting strong favor for this technology.
Using the building information model not only enables the production of construction
documents, but it also serves as a base to present the results from the structural analysis and
design in an easy sharable way, keeping all the information regarding the analysis, design and
documentation of a structural project in one place.
Nisarg M. Mistry et.al (2014) worked on Software for Building Information Modeling (BIM)
for Project Management and Controlling. It can be concluded that Revit helps to provide
immediate competitive advantage, better coordination and quality, and can contribute to
higher profitability for architects and the rest of the building team. It can also be concluded
that BIM is an efficient and reliable tool of project management. Project management can be
done more effectively by using this type of tool.
Wei Peng (2014), the art of architecture refers to the law of beauty, and uses the unique
architectural art language, so the building image has cultural value and aesthetic value, with
symbolic and formal beauty, reflecting the national character and sense of the times. This
paper takes the BIM building information modeling as integrated platform, through the Revit
data interface, and uses 3Ds max software to design the art shape of building structure.
Shashank R. Chandak (2016), presents the cost of optimization of construction projects using
BIM Software Revit. The projects conclude that by using BIM method 80% reduction in time
to generate estimates 10% saving on construction cost through clash detection. 20% saving
through construction cost simulation.
Based on the afore-mentioned literature review it is observe that ETABS and Revit are user
friendly softwares. Hence, we have decided to do analysis, designing, modelling and quantity
estimation of a residential structure by ETABS and Autodesk Revit.
Page 9
3. METHODOLOGY
The project is an analysis, design and modelling of multi-storeyed building (G+22). by using
ETABS and Autodesk Revit. The planning is done by the architect as per the client’s
requirement and This project consist of three main parts as follows:
Figure 1: Typical AutoCAD floor plan.
3.1. ANALYSIS
After completion of planning the project will move ahead by analyzing and designing process
with the help of ETABS software. ETABS offers a single user interface to perform: Analysis,
Design, Detailing, and Reporting. This software will analyze and design an educational
complex with much ease.
There is a step-by-step procedure followed by us for analyzing and designing the structure.
The steps are explained in detail in proper sequence below:
Page 10
1. Make a center line plan of AutoCAD plan of that structure.
Figure 2: Center line plan in AutoCAD.

2. Save AutoCAD Center line plan as .DXF file.
3. Opening .DXF file in ETABS and change the unit as kN.m.
4. Change the preferences from option for IS codes as IS 456:2000 for concrete, IS 800:
for steel and others.
5. Edit story data and add the stories, modify the story height and other factors in table.
Page 11
Figure 3: Edit story data table.
Similar
Story Height Elevation To
TERRACE 2.9 67.3 None
22F 2.9 64.4 1F
21F 2.9 61.5 1F
20F 2.9 58.6 1F
19F 2.9 55.7 1F
18F 2.9 52.8 1F
17F 2.9 49.9 1F
16F 2.9 47 1F
15F 2.9 44.1 1F
14F 2.9 41.2 1F
13F 2.9 38.3 1F
12F 2.9 35.4 1F
11F 2.9 32.5 1F
10F 2.9 29.6 1F
9F 2.9 26.7 1F
8F 2.9 23.8 1F
7F 2.9 20.9 1F
6F 2.9 18 1F
5F 2.9 15.1 1F
4F 2.9 12.2 1F
3F 2.9 9.3 1F
2F 2.9 6.4 1F
1F 2.9 3.5 None
GF 3.5 0.6 None
BASE 0 -2.9 None
Table
6. Define Material as M30, M35 etc. Grades of Concretes as per IS code 456-2000.
Page 12
Figure 4: Material defining table.
7. Define Section Properties like

Frame sections (like beams and columns)
Figure 5: Frame section table.

slabs and walls.
Page 13
Figure 6: Wall and Slab section table.
8. Frame section: In this section, Beams are defined as follows:
Figure 7: Beam sections provided in project.
9. And Columns are defined as follows:
Page 14
Figure 8: Column sections provided in project.

10. Slabs and shear wall are defined as follows:
Figure 9: Slab and Wall sections provided in project.
11. Modelling of elements: Beams, columns, slab and shear wall are modelled as
indicated in Centre line plan. After modelling of each element, the typical floors view
Page 15
is as follows:
Figure 10: typical floor view after modelling in ETABS.

12. Meshing of slab: After modelling meshing of slab is done by different options as
follows:
Figure 11: Area meshing dialogue box.
Page 16
13. Joints are restrained at plinth level and pinned at each upper level.
14. Load Definition: Different type of load such as Live, Dead, Seismic Loads, Wind
load, Sunk load, Water tank load, Lift room load, Water proofing load, Wall load etc.
are defined.
Figure 12: Load definition table.
Page 17
15. Assignment of Diaphragm: Rigid Diaphragm is provided.
Figure 13: Assignment of Diaphragm.

16. Response spectrum function and cases: Response spectrum is defined as per IS
1893:2002 and cases are defined in both X and Y directions.
Page 18
Figure 14: Response spectrum function as per IS 1893:2002.
Figure 15: Response spectrum case in X-direction.

17. Mass source: Mass source is defined as follows:
Figure 16: Mass source defining dialogue box.
Page 19
18. Modification of frame property:

i. Property of beam is modified by changing torsional constant as 0.01, moment of
inertia constant (I22 and I33) as 0.35.
Figure 17: Property modifier table for Beams.

ii. Property of column is modified by changing torsional constant as 0.35, moment
of inertia constant (I22 and I33) as 0.35.
Figure 18: Property modifier table for columns.

19. Assignment of loads: loads are assigned to beams, columns, slabs and shear walls.
Page 20
20. Checking of model: check the model for different as line overlap, area overlap,
loading on each floor, etc.
Figure 19: Model checking dialogue box.

21. Selection of Load Combinations: Different combination of loads are embedded in
ETABS as per IS code.
Combo Type Case Factor CaseType
DCON1 ADD DEAD 1.5 Static
DCON1 SUNK 1.5 Static
DCON1 WATERTANK 1.5 Static
DCON1 LIFTROOM 1.5 Static
DCON1 STAIRCASE 1.5 Static
DCON1 WATERPROOFING 1.5 Static
DCON1 WALL 1.5 Static
DCON2 LIVE 1.5 Static
Page 21
DCON3 WINDX 1.2 Static
DCON4 WINDX -1.2 Static
DCON5 WINDY 1.2 Static
Page 22
DCON6 WINDY -1.2 Static
Page 23
Page 24
DCON15 EQX 1.2 Static
DCON16 EQX -1.2 Static
DCON17 EQY 1.2 Static
Page 25
DCON18 EQY -1.2 Static
Page 26
Page 27
DCON27 SPECX 1.2 Spectrum
DCON28 SPECY 1.2 Spectrum
Page 28
22. Analyzing the model: After checking, model is free from warnings or errors then
analysis of the model is done.
3.2. DESIGNING
After analysing the structure, designing of the beams and columns are done on
ETABS. Designing of the structure is done as per IS 456-2000. Under this head, we
design the elements for bending,shear and torsion. We get the corresponding area of
steel to counter bending, shear and torsion (number of main bars, number of
distribution bars and spacing between the stirrups or tie bars). Different structural
members on different floors may or may not have same design and detailing schedule.
Page 29
3.3. MODELLING
This project demonstrates how to create and manage more complex projects and draw
model using Autodesk Revit software as the base layer. The group focuses on the
modeling of civil and building engineering structures, both linear and non-linear. In
modeling the quantity of material will be estimated and the 3-Dimensional view will
be displayed. Revit is a single software application that supports a BIM (Building
Information Modelling) work flow from concept to construction. Use Revit to model
designs with precision, optimize performance and collaborate more effectively.
The step by step procedure for modelling in Autodesk Revit is mentioned below:
1. Importing the AutoCAD center line plan.

2. Defining levels: Levels are defined from Foundation level, 1st to 22nd level and
terrace level.
Page 30
3. Definition of walls, beams, columns and slabs: dimensions for different walls,
beams, columns and slabs are duplicated as per schedule obtained from ETABS
analysis.
4. Modelling of foundation level: columns and footings which are required on

foundation level as per the AutoCAD drawing is placed.
5. Modelling of ground floor: This floor is being modelled as per the position of
beams and columns.
Page 31
6. Modelling of 1 st floor: This floor is modelled as per the residential complex

designed on ETABS.
7. All the typical floors are then replicated after the modelling of 1 st floor.
Page 32
3.4. Design of slab on Excel Sheets:
DESIGN OF SLAB AS PER IS-456 2000 S1
Slab ID : S1
Thickness of slab, D = 120 mm. self load 300 kg/m 2

Grade of concrete f ck = 35 N/mm 2. live 200 kg/m 2
Grade of Steel f y = 415 N/mm 2. floor finish 150 kg/m 2
Clear cover = 15 mm. sunk load 0 kg/m 2
sunk in slab = 0 mm. cobba 0 kg/m 2
diameter of short bar = 8 mm. TOTAL 650 kg/m 2
diameter of long bar = 8 mm.
Span & End Conditions for :
short bar Lx = 2.8 m. 8 D
long bar Ly = 3.6 m. 8 Ly
(Ly /Lx ) = 1.29 D D

Aspect ratio a y = 0.27 Lx
ax = 0.73
SHORT BAR: (To be provided along the shorter direction). D
Mux = 0.70 t-m.
K= 0.69 Section is singly reinforce.
Pt = 0.19 %. > 0.12%, Hence ok. (cl.26.5.2.1, IS-456: 2000).
Ast = 196.45 mm 2.
Deflection d = 0.89 mm. Safe in deflection.
spacing require, s = 256 mm c\c. < 3d, hence ok. (cl.26.3.3.b (1), IS-456: 2000).
provide 8 mm diameter bar @ 256 c\c.

LONG BAR: (To be provided along the longer direction).
Muy = 0.42 t-m.
Pt = 0.14 %. > 0.12%, Hence ok. (cl.26.5.2.1, IS-456: 2000).
Ast = 128.18 mm 2.
spacing require, s = 392 mm c\c. < 5d, Hence ok . (cl.26.3.3.b (2), IS-456: 2000)

Summary Quantity (approx.)
mm. @
Thickness. 120 1.21 cum.
short bar. 8 256 17.67 kg.
long bar. 8 392 12.78 kg.
sunk. 0 25.17 kg/cum.
Figure
Page 33
Table 1
Slab ID : S4
Thickness of slab, D = 120 mm. self load 300 kg/m 2

Grade of concrete f ck = 35 N/mm2. live 300 kg/m 2
Grade of Steel f y = 415 N/mm2. floor finish 150 kg/m 2
Clear cover = 15 mm. sunk load 0 kg/m 2
sunk in slab = 0 mm. cobba 0 kg/m 2
diameter of short bar = 8 mm. TOTAL 750 kg/m 2
diameter of long bar = 8 mm.
Span & End Conditions for :
short bar Lx = 1.8 m. 8 D
long bar Ly = 3.6 m. 8 Ly
(Ly /Lx ) = 2.00 D D

Aspect ratio a y = 0.06 Lx
ax = 0.94
SHORT BAR: (To b e provided along the shorter direction). D
Mux = 0.43 t-m.
Pt = 0.12 %. Provide m in reinf. of 0.12%. (cl.26.5.2.1), IS-456: 2000).
Ast = 144 mm2.
spacing require, s = 349 mm c\c. provide minimum spacing of 3d. (cl.26.3.3.b (1), IS-456: 2000).

LONG BAR: (To b e provided along the longer direction).
Muy = 0.11 t-m.
Pt = 0.12 %. Provide m in reinf. of 0.12%. (cl.26.5.2.1, IS-456: 2000).
Ast = 144 mm2.
spacing require, s = 349 mm c\c. < 5d, Hence ok. (cl.26.3.3.b (2), IS-456: 2000)

Summary Quantity (approx.)
mm. @
Thickness. 120 0.78 cum.
short bar. 8 303 9.23 kg.
long bar. 8 349 9.94 kg.
sunk. 0 24.65 kg/cum.
Figure
Page 34
3.5. DETAILING
Detailing of the structure is done as per IS 456-2000, IS 13920, IS 1893:2002, SP 34
etc. Detailing of the structure is performed on Autodesk Revit. The detailing is done
as follows:
3.5.1. Detailing of beams:
Figure B2
Page 35
Figure B29
3.5.2. Detailing of columns:
Figure C9 Figure C10
Page 36
3.5.3. Detailing of slabs:
Figure S-5
Figure S-1
Page 37
3.6. QUANTITY ESTIMATION

Quantity of each element in the project can be estimated by Revit Scheduling tool.
Here the estimation of rebar in one typical element.
3.6.1. Schedule of one typical Beam:
Rebar Schedule for beam B1

Family and Bar Rebar
Type Diameter Bar Length Number Reinforcement Volume
Rebar Bar: 8 T 8 mm 1750 mm 4 1055.58 cm³
Rebar Bar: 10M 10 mm 6075 mm 2 861.22 cm³
Grand total: 5 16509 mm 4840.99 cm³
3.6.2. Schedule of one typical Column:
Rebar Schedule Column C19

Bar Rebar
Family and Type Diameter Bar Length Number Reinforcement Volume
Rebar Bar: 8T 8 mm 325 mm 4 375.73 cm³
Page 38
Page 39
Grand total: 46 186556 mm 63510.44 cm³
Page 40
4. RESULT AND DESCUSION
After the detailed analysis of structure, the following results are obtained which shows the
area of steel required in respective structural members (beams, columns, shear walls). Along
with the steel area, the bending moment details, shear force details and deflections in each
beam is also obtained in a systematic manner. All these details are obtained in an auto-
generated “.docx” file which is generated automatically by ETABS software while we work
on the structure. Necessary snapshots are provided below.
As beams, columns and shear walls are designed in detailed manner in ETABS; the design of
footing is done in Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets. The details of footing design can be seen in
the following tables.
After obtaining the detailed design reports and necessary AutoCAD plans, the 3D modelling
of the structure is carried out in Autodesk Revit. We have also done the Rebar Modelling on
Revit which shows the reinforcement details structural members as per the design. The
following are some of the screenshots of reinforced structural members obtained after Rebar
Modelling.
After over viewing the above three software, discussion can be done that AutoCAD is one of
the most efficient and user-friendly software for planning purpose. ETABS give the user wide
possibilities for designing almost any kind of structure in any region and under various
conditions. Autodesk Revit is the most comfortable and user friendly software for 3D
modelling as it is very easy to understand the commands as well as to execute them. It also
provides a wide range of libraries for massing as well as for interior designing purpose.
Page 41
4.1. Story Shear:
The main on structure is due to seismic loading, for this response spectrum analysis is
performed.The story shear is the ratio of the story shear force when story collapse
occurs to the story shear force when total collapse occurs.
Story Load Loc P VX VY T MX MY

-
TERRACE EQX Bottom 0 2616.86 0 101785.9 0 -7588.9
-
TERRACE EQY Bottom 0 0 3784.75 -68923.7 10975.78 0
TERRACE SPECX Bottom 0 669.27 128.31 36118 372.106 1940.885
TERRACE SPECY Bottom 0 134.18 803 16264.6 2328.689 389.117
st
Table 1 iteration for scale factor
4.1.1. 1st iteration calculation:
.
Scale factor for U1 = = .
= 3.91
.
Scale factor for U2 = = = 4.71
Story Load Loc P VX VY T MX MY

-
TERRACE EQX Bottom 0 2616.86 0 101785.9 0 -7588.9
TERRACE EQY Bottom 0 0 -3784.75 -68923.7 10975.78 0
TERRACE SPECX Bottom 0 2502.48 479.78 135049.6 1391.349 7257.204
TERRACE SPECY Bottom 0 598.28 3580.44 72521.33 10383.27 1735.014
Table
4.1.2. 2nd iteration calculation:
.
= 1.05
.
= 1.05
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
4.2. Story Displacement:
Story displacement is the lateral deformation of the structure to the vertical axis. The
lateral displacement of the 22 storey structure is in the permissible limit for basic wind
speed 44m/sec. Displacement is zero at base due to seismic and wind loads.
Page 45
Page 46
4.3. Story Drift:
Story drift values are less than the permissible limits at base levels. The storey drift in storey
due to the minimum specified design lateral force, with partial load factor of 1 shall not
exceed 0.004 times the storey height (H/250), for the purpose of displacement requirements
only (IS 1893:2002 clause 7.11.1, 7.11.2 and 7.11.3)
The results are as follows:
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
4.4. Final Schedule of Beams, Columns, Walls and Slabs:
Page 50
5. CONCLUSION:
By the analysis and design of structure on ETABS and modelling it on revit the following
conclusions are obtained:
i. For the value of Response reduction factor (R) = 4.5, all the check for ductile shear
with ordinary moment shear resisting frame are within the permissible limits.
Therefore, the frames and shear walls are designed as per IS 456:2000, IS 13920:1993,
etc. And detailed as per 13920:2002.
ii. The structure is modelled on Revit, the detailing; rendering and estimation of
quantities of the structure can also perform on Autodesk Revit.
iii. The slabs are designed by the Microsoft Excel sheets and quantities of slabs are also
estimated by it.
Page 51
References
■ Abhay Guleria, “Structural Analysis of a Multi-Storied Building using ETABS for
different Plan Configurations”, International Journal of Engineering Research &
Technology (IJERT) Vol. 3 Issue 5, May – 2014.
■ Ajla Aksamija, Mario Guttman, Hari Priya Rangarajan and Tim Meador, “Parametric
Control of BIM Elements for Sustainable Design in Revit: Linking Design and
Analytical Software Applications Through Customization”, Perkins+Will Research
Journal 2011/ Vol 03.01.
■ Arpit A. Bhusar, Ashish R. Akhare, “Application of BIM in Structural Engineering”,
SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering (SSRG-IJCE) – volume 1 Issue5
October 2014.
■ B.Anjaneyulu , K Jaya Prakash, " Analysis And Design Of Flat Slab By Using
ETABS Software", International Journal of Science Engineering and Advance
Technology, February-2016.
■ Cesar Augusto Hunt, “The Benefits of Using Building Information Modeling
In Structural Engineering”, A report summited in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of M.S in Civil and Environmental Engineering in Utah
State University Logan, Utah (2013).
■ D.Ramya , A.V.S.Sai Kumar, “Comparative Study on Design and Analysis of
MultiStoried Building (G+10) By Staad pro and ETABS Software’s”, International
Journal Of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology October, 2015.
■ Nisarg M. Mistry, Hiren A. Rathod," Softwares for Building Information Modeling
(BIM) Project Management and Controlling", IJSRD - International Journal for
Scientific Research & Development| Vol. 2, Issue 10, 2014.
■ S. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Jagath Chandra. P, Srinivas Vasam, P Srinivasa Rao,
"Analysis of MultiStoried Structures Using ETABS", International Journal of Civil
and Structural Engineering Research Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp: (151-158), April 2015 -
September 2015.
■ Sonia Longjam, S. Aravindan, "Analysis and Design of shopping mall against lateral
forces", International Journal of Engineering Science Invention Volume 3 Issue 4 ǁ
April 2014.
■ Shashank.R.Chandak," Cost Optimization of Construction Projects using Building
Information Modelling", IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research &
Development| Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016.
■ Wei Peng, “Application of Computer 3D Simulation in Architectural Art Effect”,
2014 International Conference on Computer Science and Electronic Technology
(ICCSET 2014).
Page 52
Page 53

Analysis and Modeling of Residential Building (G+22) Using Project Information Management Platform Incorporating ETABS & REVIT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Analysis and Modeling of Residential Building (G+22) Using Project Information Management Platform Incorporating ETABS & REVIT

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis and Modeling of Residential Building (G+22) Using Project Information Management Platform Incorporating ETABS & REVIT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis and Modeling of Residential Building (G+22)

using Project Information Management Platform

Under the Guidance of

ANJUMAN-I-ISLAM’S KALSEKAR TECHNICAL CAMPUS

PROF. SIDDIQUI MOHAMMED JUNAID

DR. RAJENDRA B. MAGAR

[Type text] Page 2

1.1 AIM AND OBJECTIVES………………………………………

[Type text] Page 3

[Type text] Page 4

Modelling (or three-dimensional modelling) is the process of developing a mathematical

Revit is a software application that supports a BIM (Building Information Modeling)

[Type text] Page 5

[Type text] Page 6

Figure 1: Typical AutoCAD floor plan.

1. Make a center line plan of AutoCAD plan of that structure.

Figure 2: Center line plan in AutoCAD.

Figure 4: Material defining table.

7. Define Section Properties like

Figure 5: Frame section table.

Figure 6: Wall and Slab section table.

8. Frame section: In this section, Beams are defined as follows:

Figure 7: Beam sections provided in project.

9. And Columns are defined as follows:

Figure 8: Column sections provided in project.

Figure 9: Slab and Wall sections provided in project.

Figure 10: typical floor view after modelling in ETABS.

Figure 11: Area meshing dialogue box.

Figure 12: Load definition table.

15. Assignment of Diaphragm: Rigid Diaphragm is provided.

Figure 13: Assignment of Diaphragm.

Figure 15: Response spectrum case in X-direction.

Figure 16: Mass source defining dialogue box.

18. Modification of frame property:

Figure 17: Property modifier table for Beams.

Figure 18: Property modifier table for columns.

Figure 19: Model checking dialogue box.

1. Importing the AutoCAD center line plan.

4. Modelling of foundation level: columns and footings which are required on

6. Modelling of 1 st floor: This floor is modelled as per the residential complex

DESIGN OF SLAB AS PER IS-456 2000 S1

Thickness of slab, D = 120 mm. self load 300 kg/m 2

(Ly /Lx ) = 1.29 D D

provide 8 mm diameter bar @ 256 c\c.

provide 8 mm diameter bar @ 392 c\c.

Thickness of slab, D = 120 mm. self load 300 kg/m 2

(Ly /Lx ) = 2.00 D D

provide 8 mm diameter bar @ 303 c\c.

provide 8 mm diameter bar @ 349 c\c.

3.5.2. Detailing of columns:

Figure C9 Figure C10

3.6. QUANTITY ESTIMATION

Rebar Schedule for beam B1

3.6.2. Schedule of one typical Column:

Rebar Schedule Column C19

4. RESULT AND DESCUSION

Story Load Loc P VX VY T MX MY