Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE SYLLABUS

University of the Philippines


Prof. Tranquil S. Salvador III
 
Part I
 
 
A.Venue in Criminal Cases is Jurisdictional
 
1. Isip v. People, G.R. No.. 170298, June 26, 2007
2. Landbank of the Philippines v. Belisata, G.R. No. 170298, June 26, 2007
3. Bonifacio v. RTC of Makati, G.R. No. 184800, May 05, 2010
 
Applicable Laws:
 
a.1 Section 15, Rule 110, Rules of Criminal Procedure
a.2 Section 21, Chapter V, Republic Act 10175 otherwise known as the Cybercrime , Prevention Act of
2012
a.3 Section 58, Republic Act 9372 otherwise knownas the Human Security Act of 2007
a.4 Article 2, Revised Penal Code
 
B. Jurisdiction over the offense charged
 
b.1 Republic Act 7691
 
C.Jurisdiction to Issue Hold Departure Orders (Regular Courts Distinguished with the Sandiganbayan)
 
1.Mondejar v. Buban, A.M. No. MTJ-01-1349, July 12, 2001
2.Mupas v. Espanol, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1850, July 14, 2004
3.Santiago v. Vasquez, 217 SCRA 633
 
 
D.Jurisdiction over the person of the accused
 
1.Valdepenas v. People, G.R. No. L-20687, April 30, 1966
 
E.Jurisdiction determined by the allegations of the Complaint
 
1.Foz v. People, October 9, 2009, G.R. No. 167764
 
F. Creation of the Sandiganbayan

Section 4, Article XI of the 1987 Constitution


Presidential Decree 1486 dated June 11, 1978
Presidential Decree 1606 dated December 10, 1978
Presidential Decree 1861
Republic Act 7995 approved March 10, 1995
Republic Act 8249 approved February 5, 1997
 
 
G.Jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan
 
1. People v. Sandiganbayan, August 25, 2009, G.R. No. 167304
2. Serrana v. Sandiganbayan, January 22, 2008, G.R. 162059
3. Esquivel v. Ombudsman, September 17, 2002, G.R. 137237
 
 
H. Dismissal of the Complaint because of inordinate delay
 
1.Tatad v. Sandiganbayan, 159 SCRA 70
2.Cervantes v. Sandiganbayan, 307 SCRA 149
 
 
I.Jurisdiction of the Ombudsman
 
1. Department of Justice v. Liwag, February 11, 2005, G.R. No. 149311
2. Lazatin v. Desierto, June 5, 2009, G.R. No. 147097
3. Angeles v. Merceditas Gutierrez, G.R. Nos. 189161 & 189173, March 21, 2012
4. Busuego v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No.196842, October 9, 2013
 
Applicable law:
 
i.1 Republic Act No. 6770 otherwise known as the Ombudsman Act of 1989
 
J.Review of Decisions of the Ombudsman
 
1. Antonino v. Desierto, December 18, 2008, G.R. No. 144492
2. Enemecio v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 146731, January 13, 2004
3. Baviera v. Zoleta, G.R. NO. 169098, October 12, 2006
 
 
K.Procedure before the Ombudsman
 
1. Sesbreno v. Aglugub, February 28, 2005, A.M. No. MTJ 05-1581
2. Enriquez v. Caminade, A.M. NO. RTJ-05-1966, March 21, 2006
 
 
L.Power of the Secretary of Justice over Prosecutors
 
1. Punzalan v. de la Pena, July 21, 2004, G.R. No. 158543
2. Dino et al. v. Olivarez, G.R. No. 170447, December 04, 2009
 
 
Part II
 
 
A.Complaint or Information (Rule 110)
 
a.Sufficiency of Complaint or Information
People v. Dimaano, 469 SCRA 647
Sasot v. People, 462 SCRA 138
Lasoy v. Zenarosa, 455 SCRA 360
People v. Batin, G.R. No. 177223, November 28, 2007
People v. Cachapero, G.R. No. 153008, May 20, 2004
Bacasmas v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 189343, July 10, 2013
 
b.Substitution of Information
Saludaga v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 184537, April 23, 2010
Pacoy v. Cajigal, G.R. NO. 157472, September 28, 2007
 
c.Amended Information/Amendment
Cabo v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. NO. 169509, June 16, 2006
Kummer v. People, G.R. No. 174461, September 11, 2013
 
d.Filing of Information if there is pending Motion for Reconsideration
Ramiscal v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 172476-99, September 15, 2010
 
e.Prescription
Panaguiton v. DOJ, G.R. No. 167571, November 25, 2008
People v. Romuladez, G.R. No. 166510, April 29, 2009
Disini v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No.169823, September 11, 2013
 
f.Control and Direction of Criminal Action
Pinote v. Ayco, 477 SCRA 409
Bureau of Customs v. Whelan, G.R. No. 190487, April 13, 2011
Flores v. Gonzales, G.R. No. 188197, August 03, 2010
 
 
B.Civil Aspect of a Criminal Case (Rule 111)
 
a.Rule in Civil Liability Arising from Delict
Bun Tiong v. Balboa, G.R. No. 158177, January 28, 2008
 
b.Independent Civil Action
Simon v. Chan, G.R. No. 157547, February 23, 2011
 
c.Death of the Accused
Asilo v. People, G.R. Nos. 159017-18, March 09, 2011
People v. Bayot, G.R. No. 200030, April 18, 2012
 
d.Acquittal
People v. Tirso Velasco, G.R. No. 127444, September 13, 2000
Ching v. Nicdao, G.R. No. 141181, April 27, 2007
Coscoluella v. Sandiganbayan, G.R.No. 191411,  July 15, 2013
 
e.Prejudicial Question
Dreamwork Construction v. Janiola, G.R. No. 184861, June 30, 2009
Pimentel v. Pimentel, G.R. No. 172060, September 13, 2010
San Miguel Properties v. Perez, G.R. No.192253, September 18, 2013

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE SYLLABUS

Part II

Rule 112 Preliminary Investigation

a. Community Rural Bank v. Talavera, 455 SCRA 34


b. Serag v. Court of Appeals, 473 SCRA 590

c. Soriano v. People, G.R. No.162336, February 1, 2010

d. Samuel Lee v. KBC Bank, G.R. No. 164673, January 15, 2011

e. Okabe v. Gutierrez, May 27, 2004, G.R.No. 150185

Rule 113 Arrest

a. People v. De Leon , G.R. No. 169858, January 26, 2010

b. People v. Laguio, March 16, 2007, G.R. No. 128587

c. Valdez v. People, G.R.170180, November 23, 2007

d. Rolito Go v. Court of Appeals, G.R.No.101837, February 11, 1992

Rule 114 Bail

a. Mabutas v. Perello, A.M.-RTJ No. 03-1817, June 8, 2005.

b. Leviste v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.181922, March 17, 2010

c. Domingo v. Pagayatan, A.M.-RTJ No.03-1751, June 10, 2003

d. Lachica v. Tormis, A.M.-RTJ No. 05-1609September 20, 2005

e. Serapio v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148468, January 28, 2003

Rule 115 Rights of the Accused

a. Crisostomo v. Sandiganbayan, 456 SCRA 45

b. Andrado v. People, 452 SCRA 685

c. Olivarez v. Court of Appeals, 465 SCRA 465


d. Libuit v. People, 469 SCRA 510

e. Magtolis v. Salud, 469 SCRA 439

f. Herrera v. Alba, 460 SCRA 197

g. Yulo v. People, 452 SCRA 705

h. Petition for Radio and Television Coverage of the Multiple Murder Cases Against
Maguindanao Governor Ampatuan, June 2011

Part III

Rule 116

1. Adasa v. Abalos, G.R. No. 168617, February 19, 2007


2. People v. Documento, G.R. No. 188706, March 17, 2010

3. Virata v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No.114331, May 27, 1997

Rule 117

1. Los Banos v. Pedro, G.R. No. 173588, April 22, 2009


2. Lazarte v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 180122

3. People v. Lacson, G.R. No. 149453, October 7, 2003

Rule 118

1. Office of the Court Administrator v. Espanol, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1872, October 18, 2004
2. People v. Sunga, G.R. No. 126029, March 23, 2003
Rule 119

1. People v. Hernandez, August 28, 2006, G.R. No. 154218


2. Dayap v. Sendiong, G.R. No. 177960, January 29, 2009
3. Salazar v. People, September 23, 2003, G.R.No. 151931
4. Manguerra v. Risos, G.R. No. 152643, August 28, 2008

5. Salvanera v. People, G.R. No. 143093, May 21, 2007

6. People v. Estacio, G.R. No.171655, July 22, 2009

Rule 120

1. Merencillo v. People, G.R. No. 142369, April 13, 2007


2. Consulta v. People, G.R. No. 179462, February 12, 2009
3. Ching v. Nicdao, G.R. No. 141181, April 27, 2007

Rule 121

1. Writ of Habeas Corpus of Reynaldo de Villa, G.R.No.158802, November 17, 2004


2. Sumiran v. Damaso, G.R. No. 162518, August 19, 2009

Rule 122 to Rule 125

1. People v. Abon, G.R.No.169245, February 15, 2008


2. Quidet v. People, G.R. No.170289, April 8, 2010
3. Deus v. People, G.R. No. 178405, October 15, 2008
4. Tamayo v. People, G.R. No. 174698, July 28, 2008
5. People v. Taruc, G.R. 185202, February 18, 2009
Rule 126

1. Marimla v. People, G.R. No. 158467, October 16, 2009


2. Chan v. Honda Motors, G.R.No.172775, December 19, 2007
3. Sy Tan v. Sy Tiong, G.R. No. 174570, February 17, 2010
4. Quinicot v. People, G.R. No. 179700, June 22, 2009

You might also like