Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ST and LT Cap Fund Int With Rwacc
ST and LT Cap Fund Int With Rwacc
vs.
Long Term Capital Funding
SC #3
Cash $12.00 $43.06
A/R $37.50 $50.37 Actual growth (g) = 79.09%
Inv. $55.00 $81.61
PP&E Net $120.00 $127.12 Sustainable growth rate (g*) = 31.86% (using t=1)
OLTA $6.25 $6.25
TA $230.75 $308.40
g > g*, and will run out of funds, Ceteris Paribus
A/P $2.50 $4.48
STB $6.25 $11.19
LTD $100.00 $131.86
OLTL $0.00 $0.00
Total Liabs. $108.75 $147.53
OCI $50.00 $50.00
C/S + APIC $29.00 $29.00
R/E $43.00 $81.87
Total Equity $122.00 $160.87
Total L+E $230.75 $308.40
Check Assets - Liabilities - Equities = 0 $0.00 $0.00
Turns out that to hold Dm% at 21%, FL1 = FL0, so…. We solve for FL1 = 1.82 = $428.34/Eb1
Eb1 = $428.34/1.82 = $235.35 = (C/S1+APIC1) + RE1=$81.67 + OCI=$50 C/S1+APIC1 = $103.68
Inc Equity = (C/S1+APIC1) – (C/S0+APICo) = $103.68 - $29 = $74.68 $135.61
Inc Debt = $135.61 - $74.68 = $60.93
Given above split ($135.61 raised via $74.68 in new equity and $60.93 in additional debt), how would that change F/S?
- You are still raising $135.61, but you are using a mix of equity and debt.
- Cash balance should be same (assume I/E doesn’t change due to Debt inc)
- Cash Flow yields same ∆ Cash (assume I/E doesn’t change due to Debt inc), but FCF is tweaked
- Net Income Statement does not change (assume I/E doesn’t change due to Debt inc)
FL1=1.44 FL1=1.82
SC #4 Keeping Dm%
Cash $12.00 $178.67 Cash $12.00 $178.67
A/R $37.50 $50.37 A/R $37.50 $50.37
Inv. $55.00 $81.61 Inv. $55.00 $81.61
PP&E Net $120.00 $127.12 PP&E Net $120.00 $127.12
OLTA $6.25 $6.25 OLTA $6.25 $6.25
TA $230.75 $444.01 TA $230.75 $444.01
Net Income (or earnings) $38.87 Net Income (or earnings) $38.87
+ Depreciation $10.79 + Depreciation $10.79
- Increases in Working Cap -$32.56 - Increases in Working Cap -$32.56
+/- other non-cash adjustments $0.00 +/- other non-cash adjustments $0.00
Total Operating CF's $17.10 Total Operating CF's $17.10
+ Equity Issues (or - Equity repurchases) $135.61 + Equity Issues (or - Equity repurchases) $74.68
+ Debt Issues (or - Debt Pmts.) $31.86 + Debt Issues (or - Debt Pmts.) $92.79
- Dividends $0.00 - Dividends $0.00
Total Financing CF's $167.48 Total Financing CF's $167.47
Delta Cash $166.67 Delta Cash $166.67
Now, lets suppose that Dm% remains constant (as we just did), but your Financial Manager
tells you that she can only cover $91.08 of the $135.61 deficit. You need to come up with rest
If you need to come up with rest, you need to “Consume” less. Lets use the original
equation for Consumed Capital. Assume that Interest Expense rises from $5.06 to $6.87
Consumed Capital (Top Down) = COGS+SG&A+Inc WK+(CAPex+Dep)
Assume that you can’t change CAPex, so CAPex+Dep will remain the same as baseline
Thus, aforementioned means that you’ll need to lower COGS+SG&A+Inc WK by some amount
Lets assume that COGS drops 5%, SG&A drops 3.45%, Inv’s improve by $10.62 and that you
manage concessions with your providers to increase A/P to $6.72. In addition, you borrow
an additional $5.7 from original projection. Are these improvements enough???
COGS1x5% = $267.14x5% = $13.36
SG&A1x3.45% = $99.95x3.45% Net Income changes by
what was saved (net of Tax)
= $3.45 Op Improv’s
Inv Improvement = $10.62 and decreases by what I/E = $10.62 $35.54
increased by (net of tax)
A/Pnew – A/Porig = $6.72-$4.48 = $2.24
Relative STB increment = $16.89-$11.19 = $5.70
∆ Net Income = [($13.36+$3.45)-($6.87-$5.06)]x(1-40%) = $9.00
Improvements = $44.54
(CC1Orig-Op Improv’s)/FL0 - OCI1 -( RE1Orig + ∆NI) – [C/S0+APIC0]
, ∆ Equityinc = ($428.24-$35.54)/1.82-$50 -[$81.87 + $9]) - $29 = $45.95
, ∆ Debtinc = (FL0-1) x TE1REV - LTD0 = (1.82-1)x(29+45.95+90.87+50) -$100 = $76.94
What are the new Financial Statements???
Keeps FL1=FL0 and finances deficit with new capital Keeps FL1=FL0, finances deficit w/ Eff,PM improv’s, rest with new capital
Keeping Dm% Keeping Dm%
Cash $12.00 $178.67 Cash $12.00 $161.87
A/R $37.50 $50.37 A/R $37.50 $50.37
Inv. $55.00 $81.61 Inv. $55.00 $70.82
PP&E Net $120.00 $127.12 PP&E Net $120.00 $127.12
OLTA $6.25 $6.25 OLTA $6.25 $6.25
TA $230.75 $444.01 TA $230.75 $416.42
Net Income (or earnings) $38.87 Net Income (or earnings) $47.87
+ Depreciation $10.79 + Depreciation $10.79
- Increases in Working Cap -$32.56 - Increases in Working Cap -$13.83
+/- other non-cash adjustments $0.00 +/- other non-cash adjustments $0.00
Total Operating CF's $17.10 Total Operating CF's $44.83
+ Equity Issues (or - Equity repurchases) $74.68 + Equity Issues (or - Equity repurchases) $46.00
+ Debt Issues (or - Debt Pmts.) $92.79 + Debt Issues (or - Debt Pmts.) $76.94
- Dividends $0.00 You consume $35.54 less!!! - Dividends $0.00
Total Financing CF's $167.47 $428.35 >> $392.81 Total Financing CF's $122.94
Delta Cash $166.67 Delta Cash $149.87
In last Ex, you (as Divisional Mgr) self-financed $44.54 of the $135.61 in Deficit by finding
ways to consume less (to wit, you sought Eff and PM improvements). The rest ($135.61-
$44.54=$91.081) you needed to get from Financial Manager. The former is financing of the
type “Short Term Financing”. The latter (dealt with Equity and LTD) is “Long Term Financing”
What if Dm% into the future is different than in the past (to wit, that FL1 is < or > than FL0)?
Then, you can simply project as we have done here. But, in valuing the Equity Market, you
do the following adjustment to the Debt you subtract (assuming constant growth of FCF’s):
We do this b/c the Debt could be higher (FL1>FL0) or lower (FL1<FL0) than what is currently
reflected on the Balance Sheet as of t=0. Why do this? Because if Dm% is higher or lower,
your Rwacc reflects that higher or lower level of leverage (so an adjustment of the amount of
Debt you subtract from the total valuation is thus needed to sync up LTD with Rwacc)
Note: 1. This additional $91.08 is from the result of adding the $45.95 in new Equity and the additional $45.08 in LTD over the initial LTD at t=1 of $131.86
Effect of changing
Financial Leverage on Rwacc
If you believe that benefits of issuing debt (due to its tax shield, which tends to lower Rwacc)
are ever accruing, think twice. The more debt, the riskier both Equity and Debt become
Rwacc = Re x Em% + Rd x Dm% x (1-T)
Rwacc = Re x (1-Dm%) + Rd x Dm% x (1-T)
Rwacc = [Rf + Be x (Rm-Rf)] x (1-Dm%) + Rd x Dm% x (1-T)
Rwacc = [Rf + (Ba/Em%) x (Rm-Rf)] x (1-Dm%) + Rd x Dm% x (1-T), because Be = Ba/Em%1
- The more debt, the lower Em% is.
- The lower Em%, the higher Be is (Be = Ba/Em%) and the higher Re will be too!
- More debt increases both Re and Rd (the “drunker” the company, the worse for everyone) 2
- B/C of aforementioned, with more LTD, Rwacc drops until a point, but then Rwacc increases
Example:
Before capital issued to cover deficit:Be=1.33, Rf=2% and Rm-Rf=6%, Rd=3.5% and Dm%=21%
Re = 2%+1.33 x 6% = 10%
Rwacc=8.33% = 10% x (1-21%) + 3.5% x 21% x (1-40%), with T=40%
Rd = 3.50%
For case when you financed the deficit as all-equity, the Dm% changed from 21% to 13%
Re = 2% + [1.33 x (1-21%) / (1-13%)] x 6% = 9.24% Rwacc=8.294%=9.24% x (1-13%)
Rd = 3.20% (assume credit agency gives better rating due to lower Dm%) + 3.2% x 13% x (1-40%)
Lets assume (no financial statements are shown for this Ex) that the Dm% goes to 9%
Re = 2% + [1.33 x (1-21%) / (1-9%)] x 6% = 8.63% Rwacc=8.290%=11.0% x (1-30%)
Rd = 3.075% (assume credit agency gives better rating due to lower Dm%) + 3.075% x 30% x (1-40%)
Rwacc for a Dm%=5% (with an Rd=3.05%) = 8.297% Rwacc = 8.296% = 8.64%x95%+3.05%x5%x60%
Note: 1. Copeland’s Beta of Assets, for constant Dm% and risk of debt varying in relation to the risk of the enterprise, is said to be equal to Be x Em% + Bd x Dm%, with Bd ~ 0 (so Ba=BexEm%)
2. While not discussed in detail here, Rd is CAPM based (Rd = Rf + Bdx(RM-Rf)). However, as Long Term Debt is not as “liquid”, we take credit agency ratings as the value for Bdx(Rm-Rf)
Rwacc is NOT a declining function, but rather a function that declines and then veers up!!!
Rwacc
9.800%
9.600%
9.400%
9.200%
9.000%
8.800%
8.600%
8.400%
8.200%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Dm%
Rwacc is NOT a declining function, but rather a function that declines and then veers up!!!
Rwacc Rwacc
9.800% 8.330%
9.600% 8.325%
8.320%
9.400%
8.315%
9.200%
8.310%
9.000%
8.305%
8.800%
8.300%
8.600%
8.295%
8.400% 8.290%
8.200% 8.285%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Dm% Dm%
Effect of changing
Financial Leverage on Rwacc
VIDEO SKETCHES
1 2
3 4
5 6