SRI KRISHNA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
PO2-An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data
Criteria Excellent
4 3
Objectives & Students effectively expressed the
objective of experiment and
Equipment’s
identification of components clearly and
required completely.
Design/ Circuit Circuit diagram were drawn neatly with
all specifications and design calculations
with formulas, if necessary
Conduct Connections were perfect.
Procedures were well planned and well
Experiment &
executed.
Data Collection Data and observations were recorded
accurately, descriptively, and
completely, with no serious errors.
Data Analysis & Calculations and data analyses were
performed clearly, concisely, and
Interpretation
accurately, with correct units.
Graphs, if necessary, were drawn
accurately and neatly and were clearly
labeled.
Documentation Reasoning was perfect in the report, well
organized and clear
Understands plagiarism. Appreciate
work ethics. Combines well as team and
resolves conflict smoothly. Submit
records and observations in time. Work
is through and of good quality. Lab is
carried out with full attention to relevant
safety procedures & directions.
LABORATORY ASSESSMENT RUBRICS
Good
Students expressed the objective of
experiment and identification of
components almost completely
Circuit diagram were drawn with few
errors in specifications and design
calculations with formulas, if necessary
Connections were perfect.
Procedures were well planned and were
carried out in an organized fashion.
Data and observations were recorded
accurately, descriptively, and
completely, with only minor errors.
Calculations and data analyses were
performed accurately, with correct
units and properly worked-out
calculations, but the work may have
been slightly unclear or disorganized.
Graphs, if necessary, were drawn
accurately and neatly.
Reasoning was occasionally weak in
the report, but only in a few places.
--
Average
2 1
Students satisfactorily expressed the
objective of experiment and identification
of components weakly
Only a few errors in circuit diagram and
design calculation formulas were
observed
Only a few errors in connection.
Procedures were carried out well but may
have been slightly disorganized.
Data and observations were recorded
adequately, with only minor errors or
omissions.
Calculations and data analysis were
performed accurately, but minor errors
were made both in calculations and in
applying correct units.
Graphs, if necessary, were drawn
adequately and neatly
Reasoning was generally weak throughout
the report.
No idea of plagiarism. Does not
appreciate work ethics. Contradicting
opinions to the course instructor. Delayed
submission of course work. Work is
patchy. Not aware of safety norms.
Below average
Students may not have recognized
the objective of experiment and
identification of components; no
expression of understanding was
evident
Several serious errors in circuit
diagram and design calculation
formulas were observed
Several serious errors connection
Procedures were not well planned
and were carried out in a
disorganized fashion.
Most data and observations were
recorded adequately, but with
several significant errors or
omissions
Calculations and data analysis
were performed inaccurately, but
correct units were used most of the
time.
Graphs, if necessary, were drawn
adequately.
Errors in logic were made in the
report. The report may have been
disorganized and unclear
--