The grading rubric assesses student essays on the Emancipation Proclamation assignment based on four criteria: thesis and argument, use of evidence, and mechanics, usage and style (M.U.G.S.). For each criteria, essays can meet expectations at an outstanding, proficient, basic, below expectations, or does not meet expectations level based on elements like the clarity and focus of the thesis, relevance and thoroughness of primary source evidence used, and presence of grammatical errors.
Original Description:
Grading Rubric for Emancipation Proclamation Assignment(1)
Original Title
Grading Rubric for Emancipation Proclamation Assignment(1)
The grading rubric assesses student essays on the Emancipation Proclamation assignment based on four criteria: thesis and argument, use of evidence, and mechanics, usage and style (M.U.G.S.). For each criteria, essays can meet expectations at an outstanding, proficient, basic, below expectations, or does not meet expectations level based on elements like the clarity and focus of the thesis, relevance and thoroughness of primary source evidence used, and presence of grammatical errors.
The grading rubric assesses student essays on the Emancipation Proclamation assignment based on four criteria: thesis and argument, use of evidence, and mechanics, usage and style (M.U.G.S.). For each criteria, essays can meet expectations at an outstanding, proficient, basic, below expectations, or does not meet expectations level based on elements like the clarity and focus of the thesis, relevance and thoroughness of primary source evidence used, and presence of grammatical errors.
Grading Rubric for Emancipation Proclamation Assignment
Criteria Outstanding Proficient Basic Below Expectations Does Not Meet
A B C D Expectations F Thesis and Argument Essay has a unique title. Thesis is well Thesis is adequate, but Thesis is unclear or even Thesis is missing. No Thesis is well developed developed, but many may need further missing. Narrative or analysis or critical and clearly focused. need some additional explanation or description outweighs engagement with the Narrative and focus. Too much definition. Too much analysis. Conclusion topic. No conclusion. description kept to narrative or description narrative at the expense “goes through the minimum need for as the expense of of analysis. Conclusion motions” or is missing. analysis. The essay analysis. Essay ends “goes through the reflects in-depth with a concise motions.” The essay engagement with the conclusion. reflects passing assignment. Essay ends engagement with the with a concise topic. conclusion Use of evidence Primary source evidence Primary evidence is Supporting primary Supporting primary No relevant from the Emancipation thorough with mostly evidence is adequate evidence is irrelevant or supporting primary Proclamation is relevant to the thesis. but its relevance is not missing. Citations are evidence. Citation is thorough and relevant Proper citation is used always made clear. sloppy or missing. missing. to the thesis. Proper when needed. Citations are not always citation is used when used when needed and needed. may be in inappropriate format. M.U.G.S. –Mechanics, Writes with no errors in Writes with minor Writes with major errors Writes with numerous Writes with numerous Usage and Style grammar, capitalization, editing errors in in grammar, and repeated major and repeated major punctuation, and grammar, capitalization, capitalization, errors in grammar, errors in grammar, spelling. punctuation, and punctuation and capitalization, capitalization, spelling. spelling. punctuation and punctuation and spelling. spelling.