Thomson struggled due to its reliance on low-margin TV technology, failure to transition to digital, lack of new product offerings, ineffective diversification and acquisition strategies, high costs, underinvestment in R&D, and poor patent utilization. Management was unable to transform the business model from analog to digital technology as low-cost competitors emerged. A proactive strategy diversifying the business and developing future products was needed to address the root issues facing the company.
Thomson struggled due to its reliance on low-margin TV technology, failure to transition to digital, lack of new product offerings, ineffective diversification and acquisition strategies, high costs, underinvestment in R&D, and poor patent utilization. Management was unable to transform the business model from analog to digital technology as low-cost competitors emerged. A proactive strategy diversifying the business and developing future products was needed to address the root issues facing the company.
Thomson struggled due to its reliance on low-margin TV technology, failure to transition to digital, lack of new product offerings, ineffective diversification and acquisition strategies, high costs, underinvestment in R&D, and poor patent utilization. Management was unable to transform the business model from analog to digital technology as low-cost competitors emerged. A proactive strategy diversifying the business and developing future products was needed to address the root issues facing the company.
There are many reasons which attributed to the fall of Thomson:
1. Thomson stick to low end technology for TV sets which was under decline. There were low margins and their debt kept on increasing to be in this segment. 2. Management was not able to transform their business model for reforms from analog to digital technology as low cost competitors started emerging in Asian markets for consumer products segment 3. There were no new offering or complete solutions provided by Thomson rather Thomson provided part wise solutions 4. Thomson was lacking in good proactive strategy as they did not diversified their business model as they eliminated their medical business & defense business 5. Corporate staff size was very high and synergy was missing. 6. Thomson’s acquisition strategy was also ineffective and they acquired businesses in which they were not having expertise. 7. Investment in R&D for future product development was very low wrt revenue generation. 8. Patents were not utilized properly for further revenue generation
(b) Analysis of data, events, statements, etc., to build the big picture and arrive at the root cause/s of the problem