Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Human Work:: When Humans Collaborate With God
Human Work:: When Humans Collaborate With God
Throughout the history of human existence, many decisive events, changes, and
revolutions were determined or influenced by the prevailing working and occupational
conditions. If one will look closely at the different social systems of different eras, one will notice
that those systems represent forms of organizing human work which determine at the same time
the distribution of the economic returns of work. Human work is undoubtedly a very important
factor of social change. In fact, if one will look deeper into the causes of many social revolutions
around the world, it is not surprising to find in most of them a working condition that is
exploitative and inhuman.
2. Work as Necessary
Work is necessary because without it, human being’s self-preservation, the preservation
of the species, and the total development of human life are not possible. St. Paul said: “make it
a point of honor to . . . work with your hands as we directed you to do, so that you will give good
examples to outsiders and want for nothing” (1 Thess. 4:11).
5. Work as Service
Through their work, human beings put
themselves in the service of their brothers and sisters. In Work represents a fundamental
sharing their insights and skills with their fellow human dimension of human existence
beings, they can do a lot to serve the human family and as participation not only in the
to make the conditions of life more favorable (GS, 57). act of creation but also in that of
redemption (CSDC, 263).
It can also be said that work is a commitment for
others because by means of work man commits himself not only for his own sake but also for
others and with others. Each person collaborates in the work for others and for their good. Man
works in order to provide for the needs of his family, his community, his nation and ultimately
all humanity (C.A., 43).
Work, as a collective effort is a venue for workers to share hopes, aspirations, hardships,
and joy with one another thus drawing men together and uniting their minds, hearts and wills.
With this, human beings find themselves to be brothers and sisters (P.P., 27). Pope John Paul II
says that
In our time, the role of human work is becoming increasingly important as the productive factor
both of non-material and material wealth. Moreover, it is becoming clearer how a person’s work
is naturally interrelated with the work of others (C.A., 31).
Truly, there are people who possess sufficient wealth so much so that they do not have to
work for their livelihood. This is not bad. Rather, it is good for the society since instead of
working for their own bread, they will have greater time to render services to the Church, do
voluntary works and engage in cultural enterprises. What is important is that they still work for
the sake of other people and of the whole society.
In line with this, students have the duty to study hard, not only to get high grades but
more importantly to better equip themselves for the kind of job or profession they may choose in
the future.
D. Rights of Workers
Workers do not only have duties, they also have inalienable rights that they must enjoy.
The leaders of the society have the duty to satisfy the right of its members to have a work
that will support their needs and that of their dependents and to perform their calling to
cooperate with God in the plan of creation. Gaudium et Spes #67 teaches that “it is the duty of
society . . . to help its citizens find opportunities for adequate employment.” Pacem in Terris #64
teaches the same thing: “The government is also required to show no less energy and efficiency
in the matter of providing opportunities for suitable employment, graded to the capacity of the
workers.
But, on the other hand, although members of the society have the right to demand help
from the government in order to have an adequate employment, human reason tells us that those
who are unemployed cannot demand jobs which are not needed or beyond the economic capacity
and needs of the society especially if the over-all societal economy has no sufficient resources to
provide employment or jobs to all its unemployed citizens. Yet still, the leaders have to do all
they can within the confines of justice and charity in order to promote full employment in the
best possible way for all who have the capacity to work and want to work and most particularly,
for those who need to work in order to survive decently. And if ever those who want and are
able to work and depend on their wage for livelihood cannot be employed, then the community
has the duty to assist them. Assistance may come from richer families or communities and they
should be given without any strings attached and with the spirit of Christian charity and
compassion. Help should also be given in such a way that the receiver retains his dignity as a
person.
This right to work, however, does not give a person the right to demand for a profession
or job that he is not qualified to have nor to demand for a job that a he has learned or was prepared
for if there is no need for the said job.
Recognizing the importance of a just wage in our present society, Pope John Paul II even
makes just wage as the privileged criterion for determining whether a society and its economic
system is just (L.E., 19). He agrees with his predecessor, Pope Pius XII who considered just wage
as one of the most pressing requirements in the social program of the Church (Radio Message,
March 11, 1951).
But how can one say whether a wage is just or not? What are the criteria for a just wage?
The following are the criteria for a just wage based on the official documents of the Church:
Another idea related to the concept of a living wage is the family wage. Pope Pius XII
taught that a just wage is that which sustains the worker and his family. The wage of a head of
the family should be able to ensure that the family members who depend on him will be provided
with decent food, clothing, and shelter. In Mater et Magistra #71, Pope John XXIII wrote: “The
norms of justice and equity . . . requires that workers receive a wage sufficient to lead a life worthy
of a human being and to fulfill family responsibilities properly."
Following the teaching of Quadragesimo Anno, Pope John XXIII added another important
point to these criteria for a just wage, i.e., it is a demand of justice that workers be given the
possibility of being given some share in the enterprise. He wrote:
We must here call attention to the fact that in many countries today, the economic system is such
that large and medium sized productive enterprises achieve rapid growth precisely because they
finance replacement and plant expansion from their own revenues. Where this is the case, we
believe that such companies should grant to workers some share in the enterprise, especially
where they are paid no more than the minimum wage (M.M.,75).
But a question that one could ask is to which shall we give more priority, the wage of the
worker or the growth of the business? The Church is clear in her teaching that justice for the sake
of the workers should be prioritized. It is not just, nor even permissible to say that the growth or
expansion of the business does not allow justice for the workers to be done, if in fact, this business
or this national economy is being built on violence done to the workers. If the concrete
functioning of the business or the national economy does not allow the workers a just wage, then
the business or the economy must change rather than the worker’s call for their just rights be
suppressed (Antoncich, 1987, p. 94).
To safeguard the wage of the workers from exploitation, Pope John XXIII advised: “Just
as remuneration for work cannot be left entirely to unregulated competition, neither may it be
decided arbitrarily at the will of the more powerful. Rather, in this matter, the norms of justice
and equity should be strictly observed” (MM 71).
Lastly, it is good to note that the social teaching of the Church only lays down the
principles necessary in the existence of a just wage and she leaves it to the professional and
political persons to find the technical solutions to the present wage problems.
But very often, insurance programs are not available equally to all the members of the
society, for example, to the farmers with their lower income and other low income workers. Face
to face with this reality, the Church teaches that “insurance programs that are established for the
general public should not differ markedly whatever be the economic sector in which the
individuals work or the source of their income.” (M.M.,135) This system of social insurance
should also be a way of redistributing the income of a nation so as to reduce the imbalances
among different classes of citizens.
Regarding the protection of workers, particularly in terms of the labor conditions, the
Church teaches that efforts should be exerted, more importantly, from the side of the state
authorities to make sure that there is a protection of the worker’s person, life, and health by
regulations concerning the work place. State authorities should ensure that employers provide
safety measures against any hazards to health and life of the workers at the workplace. Workers
also have the right to be protected not only from physical harm but equally, from religious and
moral harm. They should be given the chance to practice their own faith and be granted adequate
periods of free time to attend to their religious obligations and to renew their energy. Also, no
work should be imposed upon the worker which is immoderate and beyond the hours that
human strength can endure. Likewise, no work which is incompatible with the worker’s sex and
age should be demanded from the worker.
In Laborem Exercens #7-19, Pope John Paul II emphasized that this basic rights of workers
and their families must always be protected and respected, and if ever they are threatened, the
state must intervene and secure them. He also reiterated the Church’s teaching on the dignity of
the human person which is the basis for all these rights when he taught that technical, economic,
and financial factors have to be subordinated to the human person and that industrialists,
managers and executives must see in the worker more than an accessory to a machine or a factor
in production. He also gave more concrete guidelines based on the Church’s teaching by
categorically giving the following pronouncements:
a. social benefits should cover the health care, especially in the case of accidents at
work and medical assistance should be easily available to workers if possible, cheap
or even free of charge;
b. workers have the right to a pension and to insurance for old age and in case of
accidents at work;
c. the right to rest involves a regular weekly rest comprising at least Sunday, and also
a larger period of rest, namely, the holiday or vacation taken once a year or possibly
in general shorter periods during the year;
d. workers should also be given the chance to cultivate their own potentials for their
own professional growth and development (LE 19).
Children have the right not to be compelled to work. They must be freed from
incorporation into the working process before they have sufficiently matured in body, mind and
spirit.
Child labor is one of the many problems in our society today. It is not just a social issue
but also a moral issue. The Catechism of Catholic Church states that “child labor, in its intolerable
forms, constitutes a kind of violence that is less obvious than others but it is not for this reason
any less terrible” (CCC, 639). Children are not supposed to be forced to work for their living.
They are supposed to be taken cared of and allowed to enjoy their childhood. Instead, child labor
deprives them of their rights and takes advantage of their weakness. The Catholic Church
considers child labor as a serious disrespect not only of the rights of the children but also of their
dignity as children of God. Pope Francis, in his speech at the Vatican during the celebration of
World Day Against Child Labor on June 12, 2013 stated that “All children must be able to play,
study, pray and grow, in their families, this in a harmonic context, in love and serenity but these
people instead of playing are slaves, and this is a plague. This is their right and our duty. A serene
childhood allows children to look with confidence towards life and tomorrow. Woe to those who
stifle them in their joyful enthusiasm of hope!"
The International Labor Organization (ILO) defines child labor as the “work that
deprives children of their childhood, their potential and their dignity, and that is harmful to
physical and mental development”. The ILO provides the following facts and figures on the
global situation of child labor (ILO, 2017):
• Worldwide 218 million children between 5 and 17 years are in employment. Among
them, 152 million are victims of child labor; almost half of them, 73 million, work in
hazardous child labor.
• In absolute terms, almost half of child labor (72.1 million) is to be found in Africa; 62.1
million in the Asia and the Pacific; 10.7 million in the Americas; 1.2 million in the Arab
States and 5.5 million in Europe and Central Asia.
• Almost half of all 152 million children
victims of child labor are aged 5-11 years;
42 million (28%) are 12-14 years old; and 37
million (24%) are 15-17 years old.
• 58% of all children in child labor and 62%
of all children in hazardous work are boys.
Boys appear to face a greater risk of child
labor than girls, but this may also be a
reflection of an under-reporting of girls’
work, particularly in domestic child labor.
• Child labor is concentrated primarily in
agriculture (71%), which includes fishing, forestry, livestock herding and aquaculture,
and comprises both subsistence and commercial farming; 17% in Services; and 12% in
the Industrial sector, including mining.
Most of the time they face dangerous and abusive situations and receive meager salaries.
They risk the dangers of contracting diseases, malnutrition, separation from family, lack of
education, and even death. Poverty is often blamed as the root cause of child labor. Children
work in order to help their parents earn money for the family. It is not wrong to ask children to
help in the upkeep of the family, but it should be done in such a way that the rights and safety of
children are not compromised.
To clarify what may be considered child labor and what is not, the ILO provides the
following descriptions that differentiate child labor from child work.
The Church does not agree to this kind of discrimination against women. First of all, the
Church acknowledges the special contribution of women in different spheres of life. In Gaudium
et Spes #60 it is written:
At present women are involved in nearly all spheres of life: they ought to be permitted to play
their part fully according to their own particular nature. It is up to everyone to see to it that
woman’s specific and necessary participation in cultural life be acknowledged and fostered.
The Church promotes the dignity of women. She teaches that men and women should
be protected, respected and promoted equally. Women must be given the same freedom and
dignity as that of men and they should be given the same right and opportunity in the cultural,
economic, social and political sphere.
Cognizant of the significant role of women in our society, Pope John Paul II wrote in
Laborem Exercens:
It is a fact that in many societies women work in nearly every sector of life. But it is fitting that
they should be able to fulfill their tasks in accordance with their own nature, without being
discriminated against and without being excluded from jobs for which they are capable, but also
without lack of respect for their family aspirations and for their specific role in contributing,
together with men, to the good of society. The true advancement of women requires that labor
should be structured in such a way that women do not have to pay for their advancement by
abandoning what is specific to them and at the expense of the family, in which women as mothers
have an irreplaceable role (L.E., 92).
Our government leaders acknowledge the OFW’s immense contribution to our economy
through the remittances they send for their families. They also help lessen the number of
unemployed in our country.
The Church acknowledges and upholds the right of every citizen to leave his native land
and look for a better life or source of livelihood in a foreign country. But nevertheless, the
Church insists that everything must be done
in order to prevent a greater moral harm
. . .indeed every possible effort should be
made to ensure that it may bring benefit to
the emigrant’s personal, family and social
life, both for the country to which he goes and
the country which he leaves. In this area
much depends on just legislation, in
particular with regard to the rights of
workers. It is obvious that the question of just
legislation enters into the context of the
present considerations, especially from the
point of view of these rights. . . The most
important thing is that the person working
away from his native land. . . should not be
placed at a disadvantage in comparison with
the other workers in that society in the matter
of working rights. . . The value of work
should be measured by the same standard
and not according to the difference in
nationality, religion or race (L.E., 23).
In a pastoral letter entitled: “Comfort My People, Comfort Them,” the Catholic Bishops'
Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) reiterated the right of Filipino migrant workers, be they
legal or illegal, to be given protection by the Philippine government from maltreatment and
abuses in foreign land. The bishops reminded the Philippine government, particularly its
embassies abroad, of its duty to protect the migrant workers from illegal recruiters and to see to
it that the basic human rights of our fellow Filipinos abroad are respected and protected.
The right of freely founding labor unions must be counted among the basic rights of the
human person. These unions should be truly able to represent the workers and to contribute to
the proper arrangement of economic life. Another such right is that of taking part freely in the
activity of these unions without risk of reprisal. Through this sort of orderly participation, joined
with an on-going formation in economic and social matters, all will grow day by day in the
awareness of their own function and responsibility (GS, 68).
In Laborem Exercens #20, Pope John Paul II provides a more profound discussion on the
nature of trade unions. According to him, unions are indispensable for justice to exist in the
society and that history teaches us that organizations of this type are indispensable elements of
social life, especially in modern industrialized societies. They serve as the mouthpiece of the
workers in defense of their rights.
It could be said that trade unions are necessary corrective measures to social and
managerial policies that are devoted purely to profit, regardless of the interests of the workers.
There can be a substantial imbalance of economic power between an isolated individual
employee and a large employer, and this imbalance cannot be corrected merely by the fact that
the employee has entered into a contract with the employers. In fact, contracts between unequal
parties are common causes of structural injustice. It is here that trade unions should provide the
necessary “check and balance” and promote the welfare of the workers.
Vatican Council II also acknowledges the right of the workers to strike. In Gaudium et Spes
#68 it is written that
When, however, socio-economic disputes arise, efforts must be made to come to a peaceful
settlement. Recourse must always be had first to a sincere dialogue between the parties, a strike,
nevertheless, can remain even in present day circumstances a necessary, though ultimate, aid for
the defense of the workers’ own rights and the fulfillment of their just desires. As soon as
possible, however, ways should be sought to resume negotiation and the discussion of
reconciliation.
In Laborem Exercens #20, Pope John Paul II stated that the Catholic Church recognizes
strike as a method that may be used by the workers’ groups but it must satisfy the proper
conditions and be within just limits.
i. Objective is morally acceptable. The objective for which the strike is being staged must
be lawful or morally acceptable. The cause must be a just cause. Strikers cannot go
on strike if their demands are immoral. It has to be pointed out that what is immoral
does not necessarily mean illegal nor what is legal is automatically moral. There might
be instances when workers have to rightfully and justly fight against a legal but
immoral law or policy.
ii. Morally acceptable and proportionate means. The means to be used must be morally
acceptable and proportionate to the objective pursued. The more harmful the effects
of the strike are, the graver the reason for the strike must be. The participants of the
strike must see to it that the strike will not cause greater damages to the welfare of the
people than the benefits that will be achieved from it. An example is the sudden strike
of medical doctors asking for a higher fee in a hospital without considering the welfare
of the patients in that hospital and therefore, endangering their lives. Such strike
cannot be morally permissible. Similarly, the means employed must be morally
acceptable. The end does not justify the means. Even if the demands are just and
morally valid, strikers cannot directly do immoral acts just to obtain them.
iii. No other peaceful means left. All other peaceful means to settle the dispute and solve
the problem must have been tried and exhausted. The strike should be the last resort,
i.e. if there is no other means left to the workers to obtain their just demands.