Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis and Comparison of Space Vector Modulation Schemes For A
Analysis and Comparison of Space Vector Modulation Schemes For A
Analysis and Comparison of Space Vector Modulation Schemes For A
V1 (pnnx) nnnn
D1 * V 1
Fig. 4 Projection of the reference vector into a,p plane in sector I .
The duty cycles for all the other sectors could be derived on Fig. 6 Choice of zero vector
a similar basis.
The splitting of active vectors about the zero vector as
SWITCHING SEQUENCE SCHEMES: shown below results in a significant reduction in the THD.
The number of commutations in one cycle is six.
The schemes which are analyzed are similar to the
one’s found in literature for a three leg inverter operating
under balanced load conditions [4,5,6]. All of the schemes
assume digital implementation, where the duty cycles are
precalculated at the beginning of the cycle.
Fig. 7 - Scheme 2
865
Sclieme 3 (Alfernating Zero Vector): In this scheme the SIMULATION RESULTS
zero vectors are used alternatively in adjacent cycles so
that the effective switching frequency is halved, as shown A 150 kW inverter was simulated for both
in Fig. 8.However, the sampling period is still Ts, same as balanced and unbalanced load conditions. The parameters
in the other schemes. The number of commutations in one used were L = 1.25 mH, C = 210 uF, Vg = 850 V, f, = 60
Ts is four and hence the switching losses are expected to Hz, f, = 2160 Hz, The phase current waveform and its
reduce. Current THD is significantly higher due to the spectrum for each of the schemes for balanced load
existence of the harmonics at half the sampling fiequency. conditions are shown in Fig.9
lpnnn 1 pnnp I ppnp pppp j ppnp 1 pnnp j pnnn nnnn j The simulated phase currents, output voltages and
i
I :
" I
I
the current through the neutral leg for balanced and
I unbalanced load conditions are shown in Fig. 10. Scheme 1
b j I
j
was used for Fig. 10 The load was assumed to be 255 A
peak for the balanced case. For the unbalanced case the
load currents were assumed to be 2 5 5 ~ 0 ' A ,127.5L60' A, and
63.75.dA for the three phases 'a', 'b', and 'c'.
Fig. 8 - Scheme3
Scheme1
Scheme2
Scheme3
Phase currents
Output voltages
-- .&
! !
.b 6
!
- - - I .._.
866
The Fourier coefficients of the phase current can be
obtained by
ANALYSIS - cnphav_volfqe
Cnphme-currenl - (6)
2”
1-
output.
eo14
Considering a pulse shown in Fig.11 with 3’
fimdamental period To = l/f, its Fourier coefficients at
frequency nf, are given by
0.08 Scheme 1
O.OR I
. . . . , .
0 Modulation index 1
hfl = 3,a s (s
)- (- M(’
2nx
(d,T,+T,))) (4) (b)
nx 5 5 Fig. 12 (a) THD of Phase voltage
(6) THD ofphase current.
The results are similar to the three leg inverter case, [5].
Switching loss:
The switching losses are assumed to be proportional
Fig. 11 Output voltage pulse to the product of the voltage across the switch and the
current through the switch at the instant of switching. Since
where dm is the pulse duty cycle, T, is the pulse delay the voltage across the switch is the bus voltage, it is
time, V, is the pulse magnitude, and T, = l/f, considered to be a constant. Thus the losses are
A typical line/ phase voltage can be split into a proportional to the current during switching.
number of pulses equal to the ratio of f,/f, = N, with a
period To. This is illustrated for scheme 1 in Appendix. Under balanced load conditions the neutral leg
Thus the Fourier coefficients of the voltage can be found carries only the high ii-equency ripple as shown in Fig. 10.
using: Hence the switching losses are expected to be similar to the
three leg inverters. Losses for schemes 1 and 3 are
independent of the load whereas for scheme 2 the losses
c, = 1 C o n 2+
,=I
X bn2
,=I
depend on the load power factor and its loss performance
has been optimized using the flow chart presented in Fig.6.
867
The Fourier coefficients of the phase current can be
obtained by
ANALYSIS - n' phm_voltap
Cnpho.s_curreni - (6)
Z"
A. Performance Comparisonfor Balanced Loads: where z, is the line impedance.
The modulation schemes are analyzed for their
harmonic performance using an algorithm [4] where the Fig. 12 shows the variation of THD (of phase voltage and
Fourier components of the output voltage are calculated by phase current ) with modulation index for all the
summing up the Fourier components of the individual schemes,
pulses. The harmonics of the line currents are calculated by
using the load impedance information. The complete
algorithm is given in appendix.
0 Modulation index 1
(b)
(4) Fig. 12 (a) THD of Phase voltage
(b) THD ofphase current.
A
4
n r
The results are similar to the three leg inverter case, [SI.
Switching loss:
The switching losses are assumed to be proportional
to the product of the voltage across the switch and the
Fig 1I Output voltage pulse
current through the switch at the instant of switching. Since
the voltage across the switch is the bus voltage, it is
where dm is the pulse duty cycle, T, is the pulse delay
considered to be a constant. Thus the losses are
time, V, is the pulse magnitude, and T, = l/f,
proportional to the current during switching.
A typical line/ phase voltage can be split into a
number of pulses equal to the ratio of fJf, = N, with a
Under balanced load conditions the neutral leg
period To. This is illustrated for scheme 1 in Appendix.
carries only the high fi-equency ripple as shown in Fig. 10.
Thus the Fourier coefficients of the voltage can be found
Hence the switching losses are expected to be similar to the
using:
three leg inverters. Losses for schemes 1 and 3 are
independent of the load whereas for scheme 2 the losses
I.,
depend on the load power factor and its loss performance
(5) has been optimized using the flow chart presented in Fig.6.
868
Fig. 13 shows the relative variation of losses with
load power factor for the three schemes.
scheme 1
g
- 08
Scheme 2
.
c 0.5
0
z115-
0.4 >
$ 11-
* Scheme 2
----
0.1
0.2 i .
PSI
1
-80
. .
-60 -40 -20 0 20
Load power factor
40 60 80
r l t , , ~; ,
Scheme 1
~ /
Fig 13 Relative switching losses as a function of loadpowerfactor 09
100% Load power 10%
B. Performance Comparison for Unbalanced Load: Fig. 15 Variation of THD ofphase voltage with loadpower
Total Harmonic Distortion:
Depending on the load and load power factor Switching Losses:
angle (lpf) there are several cases of unbalance that could Load power factor angle unbalance: Here though
be studied. Two cases are presented here. the load currents are all of the same magnitude the currents
(1) Load power factor angle unbalance: Here each of the through the filter inductors and hence the switches are
three phases are assumed to be carrying full load current, dependent on the load power factor. Fig.16 shows the
however the lpf of ‘phase a’ is assumed to vary from -90 variation of switching losses with load power factor.
to 90. Fig. 14 shows the variation of THD of phase voltage
when the lpf is leading and lagging.
1Zr . . .
17-
14-
16-
15-
040 io i o inio io 0
Load power factor angle
(b)
0 Load power factor angle 90 Fig. 16 Relative switching lossfor
(b) (a) Leading loadpowerfactors
Fig 14 Variation of THD ofphase voltage with loadpowerfactor (b) Lagging loadpower factors
a) leading, b) lagging
869
I Modulation schemes Scheme 1 Scheme 2 Scheme 3
Symmetric Highest Current Alternating Zero
not Switched Vector
No of commutations in Ts 8 6 4
Number of switching states in Ts * 10 7 4
Dominant harmonic fs fs &I2
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
This paper analyzes the most important
modulation schemes for both balanced and unbalanced [l] Richard Zhang, Dushan Boroyevich, V.Himamshu Prasad,
Hengchun Mao, Fred C lee, and Stephen Dubovsky,” A Three-phase
load conditions for a four-leg inverter. The analysis was Inverter with a Neutral Leg with space vector modulation”, Conference
performed over the entire range of modulation index and Record of IEEE APEC 1997.
over the entire range of load power factor for the balanced [2] Thomas M. Jahns, R. W. De Doncker, et al,” System Design
load conditions. Two typical unbalance conditions - load Considerations for a High-Power Aerospace Resonant Link Converter,”
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vo1.8, No.4, 1993
power factor angle and load magnitude, were studied for [3] H.W. van der Broeck, H.C. Skudelny, and G.V.Stanke, “ Analysis
harmonic distortion and switching losses. Table 1 and realization of a Pulse Width Modulator based on Voltage Space
summarizes the results of the analysis. The analysis clearly Vector ,” IEEE Trans. on Ind. App.,vol 24, no. 1, pp.142-150, 1988. [4]
brings out the trade off s to be observed between the THD V. Himamshu Prasad, Dushan Boroyevich and Stephen Dubovsky,
“ Comparison of high frequency PWM algorithms for a Voltage Source
and switching losses i.e., a scheme with low THD usually Inverter,” Proc VPEC 1996 Ann Meet,pp. 115-122.
has high losses. Also the design of filter inductance must [ 5 ] D.G.Holmes ,“ The Significance of Zero Space Vector for Carrier
be done for the worst case unbalance situation. The study based PWM Schemes,” Proc. IEEE-IAS 1995 Ann.Meet.,pp. 245 1 -
of unbalanced load conditions reveals that both THD and 2458.
[6] Victor R. Stefanovic, and Slobodan N. Vukosavic,” Space vector
losses increase. Overall scheme 1 should be used at low PWM Voltage Control with Optimized Switching Strategy,” IEEE IAS-
switching frequencies where the switching loss is small. At 1992 Ann Meet,pp.l025 - 1033.
high switching frequencies scheme 2 is recommended.
870
APPENDIX
Table A. 1
87 1