Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Country Health Profile 2019 Sweden PDF
Country Health Profile 2019 Sweden PDF
Sweden
Country Health Profile 2019
The Country Health Profile series Contents
The State of Health in the EU’s Country Health Profiles 1. HIGHLIGHTS 3
provide a concise and policy-relevant overview of 2. HEALTH IN SWEDEN 4
health and health systems in the EU/European Economic
3. RISK FACTORS 7
Area. They emphasise the particular characteristics and
challenges in each country against a backdrop of cross- 4. THE HEALTH SYSTEM 9
country comparisons. The aim is to support policymakers 5. PERFORMANCE OF THE HEALTH SYSTEM 12
and influencers with a means for mutual learning and 5.1. Effectiveness 12
voluntary exchange.
5.2. Accessibility 16
The profiles are the joint work of the OECD and the 5.3. Resilience 19
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 6. KEY FINDINGS 22
in cooperation with the European Commission. The team
is grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions
provided by the Health Systems and Policy Monitor
network, the OECD Health Committee and the EU Expert
Group on Health Information.
Data and information sources The calculated EU averages are weighted averages of
the 28 Member States unless otherwise noted. These EU
The data and information in the Country Health Profiles averages do not include Iceland and Norway.
are based mainly on national official statistics provided
to Eurostat and the OECD, which were validated to This profile was completed in August 2019, based on
ensure the highest standards of data comparability. data available in July 2019.
The sources and methods underlying these data are
To download the Excel spreadsheet matching all the
available in the Eurostat Database and the OECD health
tables and graphs in this profile, just type the following
database. Some additional data also come from the
URL into your Internet browser: http://www.oecd.org/
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), the
health/Country-Health-Profiles-2019-Sweden.xls
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
(ECDC), the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children
(HBSC) surveys and the World Health Organization
(WHO), as well as other national sources.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of
the OECD or of its member countries, or of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies or any of its Partners. The views expressed herein
can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union.
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation
of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
© OECD and World Health Organization (acting as the host organisation for, and secretariat of, the European Observatory on Health Systems and
Policies) 2019
SE EU Health status
84 Life expectancy at birth was 82.5 years in 2017 – over 1.5 years above the
82.5
82 80.9
EU average. While stroke and other cardiovascular diseases are decreasing
80
79.8 as causes of death, a growing number of people are dying from Alzheimer’s
78 77.3
disease and other dementias. About half of Swedes aged over 65 report
having one or more chronic diseases.
76 2000 2017
Life expectancy at birth, years
SE EU Risk factors
%01
Country
%01 EU
Smoking 10 % Only 10 % of adults in Sweden smoked every day in 2017, down from 19 %
in 2000, and the lowest rate among all EU countries. However, the use
20 % EU
Binge drinking of other tobacco products such as snuff is common, especially among
Country
men. Overall alcohol consumption per adult has decreased over the past
Obesity 13 %
decade, but one-fifth of adults reported heavy alcohol consumption on a
regular basis in 2014. The obesity rate among adults increased from 9 % in
% of adults 2000 to 13 % in 2017 but remains below the EU average.
SE EU Health system
EUR 4 000 Sweden has the third highest health spending in the EU as a share of GDP
EURSmoking
3 000 17 (11.0 % in 2017 compared to the EU average of 9.8 %), and the third highest
EUR 2 000 per capita spending (EUR 3 872 compared to the EU average of EUR 2 884).
EURBinge
1 000drinking
22
Most health spending is publicly funded (84 %), a share also higher than
2011 2017
the EU average (79 %).
Per capita spending (EUR PPP)
Obesity 21
2 Health in Sweden
Life expectancy in Sweden is higher been slightly slower in Sweden than elsewhere in the
than in most other EU countries EU. Between 2000 and 2017, Swedes gained 2.7 years
of life, compared with 3.6 years for all EU citizens
In 2017, life expectancy at birth of the Swedish (Figure 1). The gender gap in Sweden has narrowed, as
population was 82.5 years, more than 1.5 years above men have gained more years in life expectancy than
the EU average (80.9 years). Progress, however, has women.
Gender gap:
Sweden: 3.3 years
83.4
85 –
83.1
82.6
82.7
82.7
82.5
82.4
82.2
82.2
81.8
81.6
81.6
81.7
81.7
81.4
81.3
81.2
80.9
81.1
81.1
79.1
78.4
80 –
77.8
78
77.3
75.8
75.3
76
74.9
74.8
75 –
70 –
65 –
n
ly
or e
ay
Sw nd
en
Cy a
Lu Ire s
m d
he rg
Au s
Fi ia
Be d
Po um
te Gr l
ng e
m
G enia
D any
k
EU
Es ia
Cr ia
Po ia
Sl nd
H kia
th y
Ro nia
La a
Bu ia
ia
a
u
nd
c
ar
t
i
Li ar
ai
xe lan
an
ug
r
an
tv
ar
Ita
do
et ou
al
an
e
pr
w
ed
st
a
la
oa
a
Sp
ec
to
ua
m
g
i
e
rla
lg
lg
el
nl
M
ov
ov
rt
m
un
b
Fr
en
Cz
Ic
er
N
Sl
Ki
d
N
ni
U
Social inequalities in life expectancy Figure 2. The education gap in life expectancy is
four years for men and three years for women
exist, but are less pronounced than
in many other EU countries
Life expectancy at age 30 for men with the lowest
level of education was more than four years lower
55.9
than for those with the highest level in 2016 (Figure 2). 53.0 years 53.3
years 49.2 years
This gap was smaller among women (about three years
years). Although these education gaps in longevity are
less pronounced than in many other EU countries,
they have increased by 0.3 years for men and 0.1 years Lower Higher Lower Higher
for women over the last decade. educated educated educated educated
women women men men
This education gap can be explained at least partly by
Education gap in life expectancy at age 30:
differences in exposure to risk factors and lifestyle,
including higher smoking rates, poorer nutrition and Sweden: 2.9 years Sweden: 4.1 years
EU21: 4.1 years EU21: 7.6 years
higher obesity rates among people with low levels
of education (see Section 3). It is also related to
differences in income level and income standards, Note: Data refer to life expectancy at age 30. High education is defined
as people who have completed tertiary education (ISCED 5-8) whereas
which affects exposure to other risk factors and low education is defined as people who have not completed secondary
access to care. education (ISCED 0-2).
Source: Eurostat Database (data refer to 2016).
Figure 3. The leading causes of death are still ischaemic heart disease and stroke, but mortality from
Alzheimer’s disease has increased greatly
% change 2000-16 (or nearest year)
50
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Pancreatic cancer Lung cancer
0
40 60 80 100 120 140
Diabetes Colorectal cancer
Prostate cancer
-50
Pneumonia Stroke
Note: The size of the bubbles is proportional to the mortality rates in 2016. The increase in mortality rates from Alzheimer’s disease is largely due to changes
in diagnostic and death registration practices.
Source: Eurostat Database.
Most Swedes report being in good health, Figure 4. Inequalities in self-rated health by income
level are similar to the EU average
but there are disparities by income group
Low income Total population High income
In 2017, more than three-quarters of people in Ireland
Sweden (77 %) reported being in good health, a greater Cyprus
Norway
share than in the EU as a whole (70 %). However, as Italy1
in other countries, people on lower incomes are less Sweden
Netherlands
likely to report being in good health: only two-thirds Iceland
Malta
(67 %) of Swedes in the lowest income quintile report United Kingdom
being in good health compared to 87 % of those in Belgium
Spain
the highest (Figure 4). This gap is similar to the EU Greece1
Denmark
average. Luxembourg
Romania1
Austria
Finland
EU
France
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Germany
Slovenia
Czechia
Croatia
Hungary
Poland
Estonia
Portugal
Latvia
Lithuania
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of adults who report being in good health
Note: 1. The shares for the total population and the population on low
incomes are roughly the same.
Source: Eurostat Database, based on EU-SILC (data refer to 2017).
Swedes live longer than before, but While nearly half of Swedes aged 65 them reported in
not all remain healthy in old age 2017 having at least one chronic condition, this does
not necessarily hinder them from living a normal life
The share of people aged 65 and over is steadily and carrying on their usual activities. Most people
growing in Sweden because of rising life expectancy. are able to continue to live independently in old
In 2017, one in five people (20 %) in Sweden were aged age; just over one in ten people aged 65 and over
65 and over, up from 16 % in 1980; this is projected to reported some limitations in basic activities of daily
reach one in four people (25 %) by 2050. living, such as dressing and eating, that may require
assistance. This proportion is much lower than the EU
In 2017, Swedes aged 65 could expect to live slightly
average and mainly concentrated among people aged
more than 20 years – an increase of about two years
over 80.
since 2000 – and most of these years are spent
without disability (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Nearly half of Swedes after age 65 have at least one chronic disease
Notes: 1. Chronic diseases include heart attack, stroke, diabetes, Parkinson disease, Alzheimer’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. 2. Basic
activities of daily living include dressing, walking across a room, bathing or showering, eating, getting in or out of bed and using the toilet. 3. People are
considered to have moderate depression symptoms if they report more than three depression symptoms (out of 12 possible variables).
Source: Eurostat Database for life expectancy and healthy life years (data refer to 2017); SHARE survey for other indicators (data refer to 2017).
Figure 6. More than one in three deaths in Sweden can be attributed to behavioural risk factors
Alcohol
Sweden: 3%
EU: 6%
Note: The overall number of deaths related to these risk factors (33 000) is lower than the sum of each one taken individually (36 000), because the same
death can be attributed to more than one risk factor. Dietary risks include 14 components such as low fruit and vegetable consumption, and high sugar-
sweetened beverages and salt consumption.
Source: IHME (2018), Global Health Data Exchange (estimates refer to 2017).
Smoking among adults has decreased, but Among adolescents, 13 % of 15- and 16-year-olds
alcohol consumption remains a concern reported in 2015 that they had smoked in the previous
month, much less than in most EU countries. The
About 10 % of adults in Sweden smoked daily in 2017, proportion of 15- and 16-year-olds who reported binge
down from 14 % in 2010. The proportion of adults drinking at least once in the past month in 2015 was
who smoke every day in Sweden is the lowest in the also among the lowest in the EU.
EU. These figures, however, do not include the use
of other tobacco products. In 2016, 21 % of Swedish Overweight and obesity among
men and 4 % of women used snuff daily (NOMESCO, children and adults are growing
2017). As with other tobacco products, the use of snuff
increases the risk of ischaemic heart disease and More than one in eight adults in Sweden (13 %) were
stroke, as well as pancreatic, mouth and oesophageal obese in 2017, a rate that has grown over time but
cancers. remains lower than in most other EU countries.
Alcohol sales and consumption have generally Child overweight and obesity rates are also growing.
decreased over the past decade (Systembolaget, 2019), Nearly 20 % of 15-year-olds in Sweden were
but one in five adults reported regular heavy alcohol overweight or obese in 2013-14, a rate higher than the
consumption (binge drinking1 ) in 2014, a higher EU average (17 %). This rate increased substantially
proportion than in most EU countries (Figure 7). between 2001-02 and 2013-14.
Regular binge drinking in Sweden is more than twice
as frequent among men as among women – a pattern
also observed in many EU countries.
1: Binge drinking is defined as consuming six or more alcoholic drinks on a single occasion for adults, and five or more alcoholic drinks for adolescents.
The proportion of Swedish teenagers who report Social inequality contributes to health risks
engaging in at least moderate physical activity
each day is lower than in most EU countries. This is Many behavioural risk factors in Sweden are more
particularly the case among teenage girls: only 10 % common among people with lower education or
of 15-year-old girls in Sweden reported doing at least income. In 2016, one in seven adults (14 %) who had
moderate physical activity in 2013-14 compared to not completed secondary education smoked daily,
15 % s among 15-year-old boys. compared to only 5 % among those with tertiary
education (Folkhälsomyndigheten, 2018a). In the same
vein, 65 % of adults without secondary education
were overweight or obese, compared to only 44 % of
those with higher education (Folkhälsomyndigheten,
2018b). This higher prevalence of risk factors among
socially disadvantaged groups has a significant impact
on health inequalities.
Figure 7. Child overweight and obesity and physical inactivity are growing public health issues in Sweden
Smoking (children)
Obesity (adults)
Note: The closer the dot is to the centre, the better the country performs compared to other EU countries. No country is in the white ‘target area’ as there is
room for progress in all countries in all areas.
Source: OECD calculations based on ESPAD survey 2015 and HBSC survey 2013-14 for children indicators; and EU-SILC 2017, EHIS 2014 and OECD Health
Statistics 2019 for adults indicators. Select dots + Effect > Transform scale 130%
Public expenditure accounts for 84 %, which is Expenditure on pharmaceuticals and medical devices
considerably above the EU average (79 %). Most of takes up a smaller proportion of health spending
the remaining health spending (15 %) is paid directly (12 %) than the EU average (18 %). In Sweden, as in
out of pocket by households, while voluntary health other EU countries, this only includes those dispensed
insurance only accounts for about 1 % of health outside hospital, not those purchased in hospital,
spending (see Section 5.2). However, the number which are reported under inpatient care (or outpatient
of people with private voluntary health insurance care in hospital). The relatively low spending on
coverage is increasing rapidly, as this facilitates pharmaceuticals dispensed outside hospital in
quicker access to consultation and care than using Sweden is due partly to low prices for medicines (see
the public services. Section 5.3), as well as fairly high use of generics.
4 000 10.0
3 000 7.5
2 000 5.0
1 000 2.5
0 0.0
Ge way
Au y
S ria
he n
nm s
k
m e
Be rg
Ire m
Ice d
ite Fin d
Ki nd
m
EU
ta
ly
Cz n
Sl hia
Po nia
Cy al
Gr s
Sl ce
Li akia
Es ia
Po ia
Hu nd
Bu ry
Cr ia
La a
Ro via
ia
De nd
u
xe nc
ar
ti
an
et de
ai
n
n
ug
n
n
ar
an
Ita
iu
do
u
a
al
ee
pr
st
la
la
la
la
oa
t
Sp
ec
ua
to
ng
bo
Lu Fra
rla
rm
lg
N we
lg
ov
ov
rt
m
or
ng
th
N
d
Un
Figure 9. Outpatient care and long-term care are the two main health spending items in Sweden
EUR PPP per capita Sweden EU
1 600
34%
1 400 of total
spending
126 89
0 89
0
Outpatient care1 0
Long-term care2 0 care3
Inpatient 0
Pharmaceuticals 0
Prevention5
and medical devices4
Note: Administration costs are not included. 1. Includes home care; 2. Includes only the health component; 3. Includes curative-rehabilitative care in hospital
and other settings; 4. Includes only the outpatient market.
Source: OECD Health Statistics 2019; Eurostat Database (data refer to 2017).
Population coverage is high and user primary care visit, 200-400 kronor (EUR 19-38) for a
charges vary across regions specialist visit and 100 kronor (EUR 9.5) per day of
hospitalisation for an adult. User fees for medical
The Swedish system provides coverage for all consultations are capped at 1 150 kronor (EUR 109)
residents, regardless of nationality, while emergency per individual per year, as are prescribed medicines at
coverage is provided to all patients from the EU/ 2 300 kronor (EUR 218). Exemptions from user charges
EEA and via bilateral agreements. Services are apply for children, adolescents, pregnant women and
either free or highly subsidised, with user charges older people.
set by the regions for primary and specialist care.
For 2019, fees were 0-300 kronor (EUR 0-28) for a
Figure 10. Sweden has many doctors and nurses per population relative to other EU countries
Practicing nurses per 1 000 population
20
Doctors Low Doctors High
Nurses High Nurses High
18 NO
16
FI IS
14
IE DE
12 LU
BE
NL SE
10 SI DK
FR
EU EU average: 8.5
8 UK MT
HR LT
HU
RO EE CZ ES PT AT
6 IT
PL SK
LV CY BG
4
EL
2
Doctors Low Doctors High
Nurses Low EU average: 3.6 Nurses Low
0
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5
Practicing doctors per 1 000 population
Note: In Portugal and Greece, data refer to all doctors licensed to practise, resulting in a large overestimation of the number of practising doctors (e.g. of
around 30 % in Portugal). In Austria and Greece, the number of nurses is underestimated as it only includes those working in hospital.
Source: Eurostat Database (the data for Sweden refer to 2016; for most other countries they refer to 2017).
A waiting time guarantee aims to assessment in primary care within three days, to see a
strengthen access to services specialist within 90 days and to receive any necessary
treatment/surgery within 90 days. When these
Swedish people are free to choose their primary care thresholds for waiting times are exceeded, patients
providers and contact specialists directly in most are offered care elsewhere, paid for by their region.
regions. Waiting time guarantees are designed to Nevertheless, these waiting times thresholds are
ensure that patients are able to contact a primary exceeded in many cases (see Section 5.2).
care centre the same day, to receive a medical
Note: Preventable mortality is defined as death that can be mainly avoided through public health and primary prevention interventions. Mortality from
treatable (or amenable) causes is defined as death that can be mainly avoided through health care interventions, including screening and treatment. Both
indicators refer to premature mortality (under age 75). The data is based on the revised OECD/Eurostat lists.
Source: Eurostat Database (data refer to 2016)
Figure 12. Vaccination rate is high among children, Low rates of hospital admissions reflect a
but lower among older people shift from inpatient to outpatient care
Sweden EU For several communicable or chronic diseases,
Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis admissions to hospital can be avoided through
Among children aged 2 well-organised prevention and primary care.
97 % 94 % Admission rates for chronic diseases such as asthma
and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),
diabetes and congestive heart failure are below the
EU average (Figure 14), although some countries have
Measles
Among children aged 2 even lower rates. These low rates in Sweden can be
explained at least partly by the shift from inpatient
97 % 94 %
to outpatient care, so that only patients with higher
clinical needs are admitted, while others are managed
in primary and outpatient care settings.
Hepatitis B
Among children aged 2
Figure 13. Mortality rates following hospital
92 % 93 % admission for acute myocardial infarction and stroke
are low
30-day mortality rate per 100 hospitalisations
30
Influenza
Among people aged 65 and over 25
49 % 44 %
20
15
EU16
10 SE
EU17
Note: The data refer to the third dose for diphtheria, tetanus and
pertussis, and hepatitis B, and the first dose for measles. SE
Source: WHO/UNICEF Global Health Observatory Data Repository 5
for children (data refer to 2018); OECD Health Statistics and Eurostat
Database for people aged 65 and over (data refer to 2017 or nearest year). 0
AMI Stroke
800
600
400
200
0
al
ly
ia
en
ay
nd
ce
21
ria
ta
ia
nd
ry
a
nd
ar
ni
hi
ni
an
ai
an
an
ug
en
ak
Ita
do
iu
EU
ga
al
an
w
ed
st
la
la
Sp
to
ec
ua
m
rla
m
lg
el
nl
ov
ov
rt
or
Ire
Po
Au
un
ng
Fr
Sw
en
Es
Cz
Ic
th
Be
Fi
er
Po
he
Sl
Sl
H
Ki
Li
et
d
N
te
ni
U
Source: OECD Health Statistics 2019 (data refer to 2017 or nearest year).
Cancer care has improved, but Cervical cancer screening is also rolled out nationally
screening is still not fully rolled out for women aged 23-59, with high uptake (82 % in
2016).
Survival following diagnosis for different types of
cancer (breast, cervical, colorectal and lung cancer) On the other hand, screening for colorectal cancer
has increased in Sweden over the past decade and is not yet widely offered to men and women across
is among the highest in the EU, reflecting earlier the country, and only two of the 21 county councils
diagnosis and effective treatments (Figure 15). provide screening for their residents aged 50-59.
This explains why only 33 % of people aged 50-74 in
Since the launch of the national cancer strategy Sweden reported ever having been screened in 2014,
in 2009, Sweden has put much effort in improving compared to the EU average of almost 50 %.
cancer care, and the new government in place since
January 2019 also identified cancer care as a priority Despite generally good outcomes, cancer care has
for new investment. While the strategy has a strong been criticised for long waiting times and a lack
focus on quality and equity in treatment, it also of people-centred care. The latest national reform
targets prevention and early detection. All Swedish in cancer care attempts to improve the patient
regions offer mammography screening for women experience by creating standardised pathways
aged 40-74, with a high level of coverage. Among involving all stakeholders in the care process to
women aged 50-69, 90 % reported that they had a minimise delays and uncertainty for patients.
breast examination in the past two years in 2014.
Figure 15. Cancer survival rates in Sweden are above the EU average
5.2. Accessibility
The benefit package is broad, but some Co-payment ceilings limit adverse effects
disparities still exist across regions of user fees, but cost barriers exist
All residents in Sweden are automatically entitled to Some 15 % of health spending in Sweden is funded
publicly funded health services, and the regulation by out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure – slightly lower
of health service provision to new immigrants has than the EU average. The fees are applied to almost
also been improved. Even though Sweden has a all types of services and goods, with the exceptions
broad benefit package and a health care law with a for maternal and child health services provided in
strong focus on equity and needs-based provision, primary care settings and some services for people
the regional structure with 21 autonomous county aged over 85. The regions set the fees independently,
councils leads to some disparities in service coverage and the fee structure provides an incentive to consult
rules in different parts of the country. To mitigate this primary care over hospital visits. Only the fees for
structural problem, the National Board for Health prescribed medicines and dental services are set
and Welfare and the Swedish Association of Local at a national level. Most OOP spending goes on
Authorities and Regions work together to agree on pharmaceuticals, dental care and other outpatient
common guidelines and strategies. care, as these services are generally less covered than
hospital inpatient care (Figure 16).
Figure 16. Out-of-pocket spending is mainly on pharmaceuticals, dental care and outpatient care
Overall share of Distribution of OOP spending Overall share of Distribution of OOP spending
health spending by type of activities health spending by type of activities
Sweden EU
Inpatient 0.3% Inpatient 1.4%
Outpatient
Outpatient
medical care 3.4%
medical care 3.1%
Pharmaceuticals 4.6%
OOP OOP Pharmaceuticals 5.5%
15.0% 15.8%
Dental care 3.3%
Dental care 2.5%
Long-term care 1.8% Long-term care 2.4%
Others 1.7% Others 0.9%
Unmet medical care needs are low due to costs, distance to travel or waiting times in
2017. The percentage of people reporting unmet needs
Some people report unmet care needs due to financial for dental care was about 2 % overall in 2017, but
or non-financial barriers. Unmet medical care over 5 % among people in the lowest income group Others
needs are low: 1.4 % of all respondents and 2.4 % of Others (Figure 17).
Long-term care
respondents on low incomes reported episodes of Long-term care
unmet needs for a medical examination or treatment Dental care
Dental care
Not OOP OOP
Not OOP OOP pharmaceuticals
pharmaceuticals
Outpatient medical care
Outpatient medical care
Inpatient
Finland Iceland
Iceland Finland
EU Norway
Sweden Denmark
Norway EU
Denmark Sweden
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 5 10 15 20
% reporting unmet medical needs % reporting unmet dental needs
Note: Data refer to unmet needs for medical or dental examination or treatment due to costs, distance to travel or waiting times.
Source: Eurostat Database, based on EU-SILC (data refer to 2017).
User fees for many services can have a rationing Waiting times continue to
effect. National ceilings on fees are separate for attract public attention
care services, prescription medicines, health-related
transport and medical aids, but counties have As in many other national health service systems,
different methods to weigh reimbursement according waiting times have been a longstanding feature of
to health care needs. Consequently, the total annual the Swedish health system and the problem has been
amount can be substantial for people on low incomes. subject to numerous debates and policy initiatives.
In addition, dental care is not included in the benefit
The most important policy initiative was the Health
package and is subject to higher co-payments for
Guarantee Act of 2010, which stipulated maximum
adults above the age of 23. The government has
waiting times for different types of service. Other
commissioned an official inquiry, with the aim of
initiatives have included national programmes to
proposing reforms to the dental care system, focusing
incentivise regions to reduce queues (these incentives
on tackling inequalities. Its final report is expected to
were abolished in 2015) and increase transparency
be delivered in 2020.
by regularly publishing data on waiting times. This
Private health insurance is rapidly has been done both at the individual provider level,
gaining popularity in Sweden to help patients make informed choices, and at the
national level, by comparing regions to put pressure
The number of people with private health insurance on regional administrations. Regional differences
has increased rapidly in the last 15 years, with an in waiting times are large (European Commission,
estimated 10 % of the population aged 16-64 now 2019a), and are generally lower in urban areas. While
thought to have supplementary health insurance, the vast majority of the population in the Stockholm
although the type of coverage and premiums vary region are able to consult a specialist and receive
substantially. This insurance is mostly employment an intervention within 90 days following a specialist
based and mainly provides people with faster access assessment, about 30 % of the population in the
to outpatient (ambulatory) visits and elective surgery, Northern region had to wait longer than 90 days to get
but often also includes health check-ups and other access to these services in 2017 (Figure 18).
occupational health services. Although private health
insurance coverage is still relatively marginal, it does
raise concerns about equity in access to services.
Figure 18. Waiting times for specialist consultation and treatment are longer in some regions
Norrbotten Norrbotten
28 32
Vasterbotten Vasterbotten
25 42
Vasternorrland Vasternorrland
Jamtland 25 Jamtland 42
25 36
Gavleborgs Gavleborgs
20 29
Dalarnas Dalarnas
22 Uppsala 36 Uppsala
21 20
Vastmanlands Vastmanlands
Varmlands Stockholms Varmlands Stockholms Varml
18 28
27 Orebro 4 37 Orebro 16 27
17 Sodermanlands 35 Sodermanlands
26 26
ntervention: Specialist consultation: Surgical intervention:
Ostergotlands Ostergotlands
le waiting Vastra Götalands 10 % of people waiting Vastra Götalands 14 % of people waiting Vastra Götal
0 days 17 at least 90 days 35 at least 90 days 17
Jonkopings Jonkopings
11 Kalmar Gotlands < 15 11 Kalmar Gotlands < 15
Hallands Kronobergs 14 10 Hallands Kronobergs 16 11 Hallands
4 7 11 15 - 24 6 32 15 - 24 7
Blekinge Blekinge
Skane > 24 Skane > 24
17 16
13 28
Waiting times have increased in recent years for nurses with specific expertise in geriatrics are able to
some services, especially for elective surgery. For knee assess the health and long-term care needs of older
replacement, while the share of patients waiting more people arriving in emergency departments.
than three months decreased sharply between 2010
and 2014, it then went up from 5 % in 2014 to 25 % in However, the number of such advanced practice
2017. Similar trends have also occurred for cataract nurses and specialist nurses remains limited, and the
surgery and hip replacement, with the share of number of new graduates with an advanced nursing
patients on waiting lists for more than three months degree and specialty training has fallen since 2005. In
more or less the same in 2017 as in 2010. The new January 2019, the government announced a renewed
government has committed to increasing efforts to effort to train more advanced practice and specialist
reduce waiting times. nurses to improve timely access to care.
Figure 19. Numbers of hospital beds and average length of stay are low
Sweden: Beds ALOS EU: Beds ALOS
Beds per 1 000 population ALOS (days)
8 10
6 8
4 6
2 4
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
However, bed occupancy rates are very high, raising For example, the regional rates of day surgery for the
concerns about patient safety, given the very limited removal of tonsils varied between 4 % and 94 % in
margins to respond to emergencies in acute care 2013 (Tiainen & Lindelius, 2016).
hospitals and stressful working conditions. A national
reporting system has recently been developed Box 3. Clinicians have played a leading role in the
Boxdiffusion
rapid 3. Clinicians have
of day played
surgery a leading role in
in Sweden
to monitor bed occupancy rates, with the aim of the rapid diffusion of day surgery in Sweden
reducing any adverse effects (Sveriges Kommuner och
One of the main factors that has contributed to
Landsting, 2018).
theOne of the
steady main factors
expansion of daythat has contributed
surgery in Sweden is
The growing adoption of day surgery has helped to clinical leadership in the adoptionsurgery
to the steady expansion of day in
of evidence-based
Sweden is clinical leadership in the adoption
guidelines to streamline pre- and postoperative
shift care from inpatient to outpatient settings and of evidence-based guidelines to streamline
achieve substantial savings, with clinicians playing surgical procedures and the promotion of safe and
pre- and postoperative surgical
effective use of day surgery. Nationwide procedures and
collaboration
a lead role in this development (Box 3). A total of the promotion of safe and effective use of day
2.7 million surgical interventions were carried out and support from national authorities have helped to
surgery.
develop andNationwide
disseminate collaboration and support
new standards, while leaving
in 2013, an increase of over 1 million interventions from national authorities have helped to develop
compared to 2005 (European Commission, 2019b). sufficient autonomy to facilitate adaptation to local
and disseminate new standards, while leaving
circumstances.
Of these, 70 % were performed as day cases in 2013, sufficient autonomy to facilitate adaptation to
compared to 42 % in 2005. Nonetheless, a 2016 review local circumstances.
by the National Board of Health and Welfare pointed
out that the full potential savings of day surgery had
not yet been reached, as the share of day surgery still
varied widely across the 21 county councils.
2: Resilience refers to health systems’ capacity to adapt effectively to changing environments, sudden shocks or crises.
Delayed discharges from hospital are an Delayed discharges for patients who no longer need to
example of care coordination issues stay in hospital is an example of coordination issues.
The number of bed days related to delayed discharges
The Swedish health system suffers from shortcomings in 2016 was much higher in Sweden than in Denmark
in care coordination at different levels and in and Norway (Table 1).
responding to patient expectations. Results from the
2016 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Since 2018, new legislation has promoted more
Survey showed that Swedish patients report negative timely discharge from hospital by strengthening
experiences with care coordination more often than cooperation among the different actors in the system.
patients in the other ten countries participating This promotes better coordination between health
in the survey (Commonwealth Fund, 2016). About care and social services following hospital discharge
one-third of respondents in Sweden declared they by creating safe and effective discharge processes. It
had experienced a problem with care coordination outlines a formal discharge procedure, which begins
or communication problems, and half of patients at hospital admission. The law obliges regions and
reported experiencing a coordination gap in hospital municipalities to enter into agreements on common
discharge planning. guidelines for cooperation and planning discharges.
Municipalities face financial penalties if they cannot
reach an agreement to better manage and reduce
delayed discharges.
Table 1. Delayed discharges use more bed days in Sweden than in Denmark and Norway
Source: Suzuki (forthcoming), Reducing delays in hospital discharge, OECD Health Working Papers (data refer to 2016).
Monitoring and improving care for people A number of initiatives to promote appropriate
with Alzheimer and other dementias use of pharmaceuticals and access to
new medicines have been launched
In 2018, about 7 % of the Swedish population aged
over 60 were living with Alzheimer’s disease and A number of initiatives have been pursued at the
this proportion is expected to rise to 9 % by 2040 if national and regional level to promote a more
the age-specific prevalence of dementia remains appropriate use of pharmaceuticals and greater use of
unchanged (OECD/EU, 2018). generics, as well as to reduce their prices.
In response to this growing burden, Sweden has Generic substitution is mandatory. In addition,
developed registries to monitor both dementia Sweden uses an approach of the ‘preferred product of
and the behavioural and psychological symptoms the month’ and established a system of mandatory
of dementia (BPSD). The BPSD registry includes substitution for the lowest priced generic alternative
data from nursing homes and other care settings, for reimbursement, regardless of what the doctor has
allowing these establishments to monitor and adapt indicated on the prescription (WHO Regional Office
the quality of care. The dementia registry includes for Europe, 2018).
data from across the health system, including
memory clinics, the majority of general practices and
long-term care. The data collected include not only
clinical information but also further indicators of
quality of life.
Box 4. Sweden joined a collaboration on health A national recommendation for the pricing of digital
technology assessment of new pharmaceuticals care has been agreed, along with a minimum patient
fee for such contacts. A government investigation
Launched in 2018, the overall objective of the is also exploring how the consumer choice system
FINOSE collaboration between the Finnish, and the emerging digital care market in primary care
Norwegian and Swedish HTA authorities is to assess should be regulated in order to improve equity.
the relative effectiveness of new pharmaceuticals
and carry out economic analysis jointly. Following
these joint assessments, each country will still have
the flexibility to make final decisions regarding the
reimbursement and prices of new pharmaceuticals,
in accordance with their national context and
regulations.
6 Key findings
• Swedish people live longer than people in • Sweden allocates a large amount of money
most other EU countries, although progress to health, with spending per capita and as
in life expectancy has been slower in Sweden a share of GDP the third highest among
than the EU average since 2000. The gender EU countries. However, the country spends
gap is relatively small, but socioeconomic comparatively little on hospital inpatient
disparities persist. Many years of life after care, focusing instead on outpatient care
age 65 are spent with one or more chronic and long-term care. This reflects deliberate
diseases and some disabilities. strategies over the past two decades to
move care from hospitals to primary care or
community care as much as possible.
• Some important risk factors to health like
smoking and alcohol drinking are generally
low in Sweden, but overweight and obesity • Sweden has relatively high numbers of
are growing public health issues among doctors and nurses, but problems persist with
adolescents and adults. Almost one in five recruiting staff, particularly in rural areas.
15-year-olds are overweight or obese, and Only 15 % of doctors are general practitioners,
almost one in eight adults are obese, up from restricting timely access to primary care.
one in eleven in 2000. Many risk factors are Some effective task-sharing between nurses
more prevalent among populations with and doctors has been implemented in primary
lower income or education, contributing to care, with nurses playing a greater role, for
socioeconomic disparities in health and life example, in managing chronic diseases.
expectancy. In 2014, the government set a However, the lack of advanced practice
goal to eliminate avoidable health status and specialist nurses hampers greater
gaps between population groups within one task-sharing in primary care and in hospitals.
generation. This has been followed up by the In January 2019, the government announced
adoption of a new public health policy in 2018, a plan to train more specialist nurses and to
aiming to facilitate the implementation of strengthen the role of assistant nurses.
actions in eight target areas and to evaluate
progress.
• Waiting times for health services are a
longstanding issue and are increasing in some
• The decentralisation of the Swedish health cases. For example, about 20 % of patients
system into 21 counties contributes to were on waiting lists for cataract surgery for
regional differences in access to care and over three months in 2018, up from 10 % in
outcomes, which goes against Sweden’s aim of 2013. The new government announced its
health equity. To mitigate these disparities, a intention to allocate more money to reducing
new redistribution system has been suggested waiting times for elective surgery and other
to ensure a more equitable distribution of health services. Another important challenge
resources across regions. Additional funding is to improve care coordination and the
is available for targeted programmes. The new timeliness of services for patients with cancer,
government announced a broad primary care mental illness, Alzheimer’s disease and other
reform, including plans to reduce regional dementias.
disparities and improve access in rural areas.
References
Burström B et al. (2017), Equity Aspects of the Primary Folkhälsomyndigheten (2018b), Övervikt och fetma
Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – A Scoping Review, [Overweight and obesity].
International Journal for Equity in Health, 16:29.
Government of Sweden (2019), Statement of
Commonwealth Fund (2016), The 2016 Commonwealth Government Policy, 21 January 2019.
Fund International Health Policy Survey of Adults.
NOMESCO (2017), Health Statistics for the Nordic
Eurofound (2017), European Quality of Life Survey 2016: countries 2017, Copenhagen.
Quality of Life, Quality of Public Services, and Quality of
Society, Luxembourg. Public Health Agency of Sweden (2019), Monitoring of
Alcohol, Narcotics, Doping and Tobacco.
European Commission-EPC (2018), The 2018 Ageing
Report – Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Swedish Transport Authority (2019), Vision Zero Academy.
Member States (2016-2070). Institutional Paper 079. May
Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (2018), Hälso- och
2018, Brussels.
sjukvårdsrapporten 2018: Öppna jämförelser. [Health
European Commission (2019a), Country Report Sweden Care Report 2018: Open Comparisons].
2019, European Semester, Brussels.
Systembolaget (2019), Så dricker vi i Sverige [How we
European Commission (2019b), Tools and Methodologies drink in Sweden].
to Assess the Efficiency of Health Care Services in Europe:
Tiainen A and Lindelius B (2016), Fortsätt utveckla
Report by Expert Group on Health System Performance
dagkirurgin [Continuing the development of day
Assessment, Brussels.
surgery].
Folkhälsomyndigheten (2018a), Daglig rökning [Daily
WHO Regional Office for Europe (2018), Medicines
smoking].
Reimbursement Policies in Europe, Copenhagen.
Country abbreviations
Austria AT Denmark DK Hungary HU Luxembourg LU Romania RO
Belgium BE Estonia EE Iceland IS Malta MT Slovakia SK
Bulgaria BG Finland FI Ireland IE Netherlands NL Slovenia SI
Croatia HR France FR Italy IT Norway NO Spain ES
Cyprus CY Germany DE Latvia LV Poland PL Sweden SE
Czechia CZ Greece EL Lithuania LT Portugal PT United Kingdom UK
Please cite this publication as: OECD/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (2019), Sweden:
Country Health Profile 2019, State of Health in the EU, OECD Publishing, Paris/European Observatory on Health
Systems and Policies, Brussels.