Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bank Bumiputera
Bank Bumiputera
FPP 1998 34
AN EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM AS
PERCEIVED BY OFFICERS OF
BY
October 1998
This project paper with a title "An Effective Performance Appraisal System as
espoused by officers of Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Berhad" has been prepared by
Partini Haji Ibrahim in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Science in Human Resource Development.
Approved by :
�'f/Jov (�
Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prof. Madya Dr. Maimunah binti Ismail
Department of Extension Education
Faculty of Educational Studies
U niversiti Putra Malaysia
(Supervisor)
2-6-/, (! q ¥-
Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dr. Shamsudin Ahmad
Department of Extension Education
Faculty of Educational Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Examiner)
ii
ACKNOWLEDGE M ENTS
extending my special grat it ude to Universit i Putra Ma laysia for a place to satisfy
my hunger for knowledge in the field of Huma n Resource Development and
t urni n g my dreams to achieve higher educations i nto a rea l ity.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
ABSTRAK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xii
CHAPTER
INTRODUCTION
II REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Concepts of Performance Management Systems (PMS) . . . . 15
Purposes of Performance Appraisals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Approaches to Appraisal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Performance Appraisal Cycle/Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Factors Associated with PMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 37
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
iv
III M ETHODS AND PROC EDURES
Research Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Theoritical and Research Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Hypotheses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Measurement and Instrument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Pre-testing of I nstrument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Population and Sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Data Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Research Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Significance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 81
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
I mplications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
v
APPENDICES
VITA 1 17
vi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
Appraisal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Appraisal Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
7. Breakdown of Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Appraisal System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Coaching Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
vii
1 6. T-test to Determine the Differences of the
Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
ix
Abstract of project paper submitted to the Department of Extension Education,
Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia in partial fulfilment of
the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Human Resource
Development.
BY
PARTINI HAJI IBRAHIM
OCTOBER 1 998
The results of the study revealed that there are a number of major
shortcomi ngs of the current PAS which need to be addressed by the Bank in
developing an effective PAS. It is further concluded that an effective PAS should
comprised of performance planning process, performance coaching process,
performance review process and performance appraisal process. There is no
x
significance differences on responses of male and female respondents towards
the planning process, coaching process, review process and performance
appraisal process.. However, there were significant differences between
managers' and executives' responses towards coaching and reviewing processes.
On the other hand length of service is negatively related to planning process and
therefore long service officers do not see planning process as a characteristic of
an effective PAS.
xi
Abstrak projek penyelidikan yang dikemukakan kepada Jabatan Pendidikan
Pengembangan, Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan, Universiti Putra Malaysia sebagai
memenuhi sebahagian daripada keperluan untuk mendapatkan Ijazah M aster
Sains.
Oleh
PARTINI HAJI IBRAHIM
Oktober 1 998
xiii
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Wit h the above object ives, principal aims, the Bank has came u p with a
mission and vision statement as stated briefly below:
Vision Statem e nt
Our vIsion IS to t ra nsform Ban k Bumlput ra Into a BETTER ban k better
t ha n before, better t ha n others
All organizat ions face the task of p repanng their organizations for t h e
futu re O rganizations know t hat change I S n ecesssa ry If t h ey are gOing t o b e
sufficient ly compet itive to meet tomorrow's cha llenges While no one can predict
t h e future , each of us must do our best to anticipate the changes required to
p repa re our organizations for It
One of the ways In IdentifYing the possible threats and opportunit ies IS by
conducting an orga nizational climate survey The Importa nce of organizat iona l
climate survey I S becoming appare nt as It IS a link between the Individua l and t h e
organizatio n (Floclone, Sussma n & Herden , 1 987 , Kozlowski & Doherty, 1 989 ,
Poole, 1 985 Schneider, 1 983 a , 1 983 b), If these beliefs a n d attitudes a bout
t h e orga nizat ion a re favourable, It may then follow t hat the individua l w i l l be
committed to the orga nization Welsch and La Va n's ( 1 98 1 ) research supports
this view
Taglun views climate as a property of the organ izat ion Itself, Ident ifiable
by particular charact eristi cs and I nt erpreted by organizational members , t hat In
turn affects their attitudes and mot ivation
In thiS respect , to ena ble the ba nk to Identify ItS threats and undertake the
necessa ry I n it iative or Improvement programmes or remedia l actions, the Ban k
had commissioned a consultant t o undertake a n organizationa l climate survey
a i med at measunng climate The Ba nk has selected 1 032 officers to represent
4
the total population of 4,000 officers. The participants comprises of officers from
all levels and business functions. The climate dimensions measured are as follows:
* Flexibility
* Responsibility
* Standards
* Rewards
* Clarity
* Team Commitment
%
80
60
40
20
I] Actual
o Ideal
CLIMATE DIMENSIONS
Source: BBMB Report, December 1996
*
P ractically, most Asian companies tend to exhibit more or less the same
trend except that they could be at the higher percentile.
*
What is ideal is not high. All the dimensions tend to hover around the
70th percentile, indicating that the participants are very realistic in terms
of their expectations.
*
Any gaps exceeding 20% should be a cause of concern . I n this case , It
is all except for STA N DARDS.
*
The widest gap IS with respect to REWARDS.
Threats
The em ployees of the Bank is not happy with the existing policy of
rewards which is the widest gap which exceeds 20% of the ideal percentile. The
ideal is taken as the 70th percentile of the graph. The other 2 dimenSions i . e .
clarity and responsibility should also b e a cause o f concern . It is also further
emphasized by the participants that they l i ke to see changed to make the
organization an even better place to work with respect to the following:
*
Abolish favoritism when giving promotion
*
Promotion should be based on performance and not who knows who
*
R eward system should be solely based on performance
*
A ccept ideas from lower group if their ideas are good for the
organization
*
To p lace the experienced and right person in the specific job.
*
Performance is main criteria for promotion
*
Respect and recognize the contribution of staff
*
Recognition for good work done.
*
O bjectives and goals to be clearly defined
*
Direction from supervisor must be very clear
6
Opportunities
The sampling felt t hat working in the Bank, there is a job security, friendly
working environment as well as being provided with good benefits.
I n the 1 990s, however, more and more organizations a re coming to rea l ize
t hat to compete effectively one must change the way the company is managed.
In so doing compa nies begin to recognize t hat there is no quick fix. There is no
solutio n which magically will t ra nsform a company to a more desirable, ideal
organization. Rather, Ma nagement must embrace cha nge, recognizing t hat
t here a re many related to st rategy, culture, skills, teamwork and the REWARD
a n d RECOGN I TION SYSTEM of a company ( Ba rnevick, P . , 1 994; Killma n , R ,
1 99 1 ) .
Certai n ly, the Ban k has t o undertake a lot of effort in designing and
implementing the a bove change i n it iatives. However, what the researcher i ntend
to focus i n t his p roject is to explore what a re the characteristics of a n effective
Performance Appraisal constitutes and comprises of.
Over the past fifty years, performan ce a ppraisal has become such a
common place in organizationa l life t hat virt ually every compa ny has an a ppraisa l
syst e m . I t i s claimed t hat it is becoming a serious business to inst it ut e a formal
performance a ppraisa l procedure . That is a firmly esta blished, middle-aged
management technique, however, does not mea n t hat it has achieved a
comfortable place in organizations. In fact , no one seems satisfied with the
system t hey have or content with the results it produces. Gary P . Latnam and
Kennet h N. Wexley ( 1 993) asserted t hat "Performance Appra isal Systems are a
lot l i ke seat belts" and "M ost people believe t hey are necessa ry, b ut t hey don't
l i ke to use them".
7
Simila rly like B B M B we have lived w it h the a ppra isal system over 20 years
a n d have a lways spa rked debate about their effectiveness. P roponents, not
surp rising ly, have cla imed t hat Performance Management ( P M Ps) boost a
compa ny's bottom line by linking employees' activities and compensation to
specific o rg a nization goals. Critics, meanwhile, h a v e complained that the
Resea rch conducted by Dan ielie M c Donald et .al, ( 1 996) showed a st rong
fin d i ngs that companies t hat implement PMS perform better t ha n those w ho
don't . M c Dona l d and team had furt her conducted their research on 1 8
com panies i n w hich Senior Managers and huma n resources executive were
pa rticula rly satisfied wit h the results of their PM Ps. The researchers found t hat
those programs sha red severa l characteristics . Among them:
8
*
I m plementation at the Top
The Top IS Involved I n the Implementation and used the p rogram for those
reporting directly to them
*
A Simple Process
The PM P process was relat ively simple and was I ntegrated Into the da lly
work process Some sati sfied compa n ies sa id t hey onducted PM P uSing
only single - page forms, which kept the process short a n d pa inless
*
A Reasonable N umber of Goals
The n umber of goals was lim ited t o four or five, wit h bonuses and
i ncentives to rewards those who achieved thler goals
Clinton D Longenecker (1 997) tend to suggest the formal a ppra isa ls have
been found to be a potentially effect ive device for
1 Performa nce planning and goa l setting
2 Providing performa nce feedback and coaching
3 Employee development , counseling and p lanning, and
4 Linking performance to compensation and promotion
decIsions
In order for the Ban k to address the needs of the employees of t h e Ban k
highlighted I n the organizat ional survey as threats , a n attempt must be mad e to
gat her Informat ion t hat may help policy makers to design a n effect ive
Performan ce Appra isal System ThiS IS hope to I mprove the climate dimensions
which IS a cause of concern With respect to reward , clanty and responsibility, and
hence t ransforming the Ba nk to the desired culture I e In thiS case performa nce
based culture and focus the energy of every Ban k's member towards t h e
achievement the achievement o f organizat ional goals
Statement of Problem
N evert heless, the orga nizat ional climate survey emba rked by the Ban k
has concl uded t hat the employees a re not happy With the eXisting policy o n
rewa rds They would like to s e e cha nged I n the orga nizat ion and would l i ke the
Ban k to be t ra nsformed to a performance based culture I n thiS respect the Ban k
has decided to undertake severa l Init iatives, o n e o f which IS to design a n
effective performance appraisa l system In the effort to Improve rewa rds, clanty
10
Objectives
Genera l O bjective
The objective of the study IS to examine the charactenstlcs t hat contn bute
t owa rds t h e development of an effective performance appra isal system of t h e
Ban k