Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ArticleYERMAKNonna PDF
ArticleYERMAKNonna PDF
net/publication/292722048
CITATIONS READS
0 206
4 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Algourdin Nonna on 02 February 2016.
1. INTRODUCTION
Various researchers have shown that concrete thermal instability could be the
result of vapor pressure build-up mechanisms [1] and/or the restrained thermal
dilatation mechanisms [2]. The first is connected with the pressure increase in the
porous concrete network during heating and the second is associated with
dilatation/shrinkage gradients which take place on a concrete surface subjected to
high temperature. Parameters such as water content, porosity, permeability, type of
aggregates, heating rate have an influence on concrete thermal stability. Some
research has shown that the behaviour of concrete at high temperature can be
improved by adding polypropylene fibers and steel fibers. The melting (160°C-
170°C) and vaporization (350°C) of polypropylene fibers increase porosity and
permeability of concrete, which reduce the likelihood of explosive spalling [3].
According to [4], steel fibers significantly improve the residual bending strength of
concrete.
_____________
Nonna Yermak, PhD, L2MGC, University of Cergy - Pontoise, F-95000 Cergy-Pontoise
Prosper Pliya, Lecturer, University of Cergy - Pontoise, F-95000 Cergy-Pontoise
Anne-Lise Beaucour, Lecturer, University of Cergy - Pontoise, F-95000 Cergy-Pontoise
Albert Noumowé, Professor, University of Cergy - Pontoise, F-95000 Cergy-Pontoise
Alain Simon, Project Manager, EIFFAGE TP, 12, st. Hélène Boucher, F-93330 Neuilly
sur Marne
2
One part of this work was to study the thermal stability of high strength concrete
containing PP and/or S fibers under ISO 834 fire curve. The second part was to
study influence of the fibers on the evolution of the physical and mechanical
properties of concrete as the function of the temperature during the slow heating.
2. EXPERIMENTAL SCHEDULE
2.1 Materials
The cement used was CEM I 52.5 N CE CP2 NF of “Villiers au Bouin”. The
limestone (C) and siliceous-calcareous (X) aggregates were used. Limestone
aggregates were composed of calcareous (87-91%) and quartz (9-13%). Siliceous-
calcareous aggregates were composed of flints (70-75%), calcium carbonate (20-
25%) and feldspaths (5%). The aggregates fractions were 0/4 (sand) and 4/10
(gravel). Monofilaments cylindrical PP fibres of Duomix M12 and Krampeharex
were used. The length of PP fibres was 12 mm (Duomix M12) and 6 mm
(Krampeharex). The nominal diameter was 32 µm. Dramix RC-80/30-CP steel
fibers were used. They were high carbon galvanized fibers with hooked ends. The
diameter of S fibers was 0.38 mm and the length was 30 mm.
3
during 90 days. Only one concrete [Cref(C) «drying»] was stored under this mode
and its moisture content by weight was 2.1%.
Mode 3: specimens were kept in their moulds the first seven days, then in sealed
plastic bags at least during 90 days. A pre-drying was performed 7 days before the
fire test in air-conditioned room at a temperature of 30°C and 20% of relative
humidity till the day of the tests. The average moisture content was 4.0%.
Specimens used on the second part were stored in non-drying condition (mode
1).
In the first part the 150x300 mm concrete cylinders (132 specimens) were
subjected to ISO 834 fire curve of 2 hours duration, in a large furnace (inner
dimensions of 7x5 m).
In the second part, 150x300 mm concrete cylinders and 100x100x400 mm
concrete prisms were subjected to various heating-cooling cycles from the room
temperature to 200°C, 300°C, 500°C, 600°C, 750°C, and 900°C. Each cycle
includes a phase of rise in temperature (0.5°C/min), a phase of temperature dwell
(one hour) and a phase of cooling. This slow heating ensures the homogeneity of
temperature in the specimen.
The type K thermocouples were used to monitor the temperatures of furnace,
concrete cylinder surface and centre. The thermocouple at the centre of the
specimen was placed during casting and is located at mid-height and mid-diameter.
The location of specimens in the furnace and the evolution of furnace temperature
are presented on Figure 1. The evolution of furnace temperature was compared to
standard curve ISO 834.
Compressive strength (fc): the compression test was carried out on four
cylindrical specimens ∅ 150 × 300 mm (diameter × height) with the loading rate of
0.5 MPa s-1. The test was in accordance with European standard EN 12390-3
(2012).
Flexural tensile strength (ft): the tests were carried out on three prismatic
specimens 100 × 100 × 400 mm with the loading rate of 0.05 MPa/s in accordance
with European standard EN 12390-5 (2012).
Ethanol porosity (P): each type of concrete was tested on four samples of
average mass 400 g. Porosity is obtained in according with French standard NF
P18-459 (2010).
4
TABLE I. MIX PROPORTIONS OF CONCRETES
1200
1000
Tf
800 max
600 ISO
834
400
Tf
200 min
0
0 30 60 90 120 150
(a) (b)
Figure 1 Location of the test specimens during ISO 834 fire – (a), and time-temperature curve in the furnace compared to
standard curve ISO 834 (b)
5
(a) (b)
Figure 2 [Cref (X)] – (a), and [CS 60] – (b) concretes after ISO 834 fire
In the second part of the study, the [Cref(C)], [CS 60] and [CPPS 0.75-60]
mixes were used for understanding the adverse effect of S fibers and the favorable
influence of PP fibers on the spalling. The temperature and mass transfers as well as
porosity tests were carried out. These specimens were heated at 80°C, 200°C and
500°C. The cycle temperatures were chosen according to the behaviour of PP fibres
during the heating: melting (160-165°C) and vaporization (360°C). The slow
heating tests (300°C, 600°C, 750°C, 900°C) on [CPPS 0.75-60] concrete helped to
quantify the improvement of mechanical properties, induced by cocktail of fibers on
the post-fire behavior compared to [Cref(C)].
Before heating, the concrete specimens were kept in sealed plastic bags at 20 ±
2°C at least during 90 days. The average moisture content by weight was 5.1%.
Figure 3 presents the difference between the surface and the centre temperatures
during the slow heating.
Créf(C) CPPS
CS 60 CPPS 0,75-60
150 8
6,1
Tsurf-Tcentre (°C)
Mass loss, %
The results obtained on the two concretes [Cref(C)] and [CPPS 0.75-60] at room
temperature and after heat treatment are gathered in TABLE II. Compressive
strength and flexural strength were studied as a function of the surface temperature.
The relative residual strength was calculated by dividing the residual strength after
heating-cooling cycles by the strength of the unheated concrete. The standard
deviations (SD) of the mechanical properties are given for the room temperature.
17 200
15 150
PT/P80 (%)
13
(%)
100
11
50
9
7 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 200 500
T(°C) T (°C)
Figure 5 Evolution of absolute and relative porosity of [Cref(C)], [CS 60] and [CPPS 0.75-60] concretes as a function
of heat treatment
7
Cref(C) CPPS 0,75-60
Créf(C) CPPS 0,75-60
100%
100%
fcT°/fc20
80% 80%
ftT°/ft20
60% 60%
40% 40%
20% 20%
0% 0%
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 T(°C) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
T(°C)
Figure 7 Relative residual flexural tensile strength of
Figure 6 Relative residual compressive strength of [Cref(C)],
[Cref(C)], [CPPS 0.75-60] concretes as a function of
[CPPS 0.75-60] concretes as a function of the temperature
temperature
For the two types of concretes the residual compressive strength decreased with
the temperature (Figure 6). The significant loss of strength appeared between 300
and 600°C and continued to spread until 900°C. This strain loss slope on Figure 6
was similar for the concretes with and without fibers.
It is interesting to notice that at the temperature of 900°C the improvement of
residual compressive strength of CPPS 0.75-60 was almost zero.
The flexural tensile strength decreased gradually with the rise in temperature
with or without fibers (Figure 7).
At the temperature of 600°C two concretes lose approximately 50% of their
initial strength. The more important difference in relative flexural tensile strength
between two concretes was 7%, which appeared at 750°C.
At 900°C the decreasing of residual flexural strength was sharper. Furthermore,
the intersection of the [Cref(C)] and [CPPS 0.75-60] curves appeared. We suppose
that it was due to the loss of mechanical properties of steel fibers. We have noticed
the differences in failure mechanism between 300°C, 600°C and 900°C. After the
test on CPPS at 300°C only a small crack in the middle of the specimen appeared.
There were no broken S fibers; fibers were pulled out, whereas the 900°C CPPS
concrete was failed abruptly during the test. This failure mode after 900°C can be
explained by oxidation or corrosion of the S fibers at high temperatures. [10]
noticed the beginning of oxidization phenomena at 500°C. After 700°C the
corrosion phenomenon becomes more important: at 700°C the oxide layers
thickness is about 30 µm and at 800°C it is about 75µm, whether 84% of the section
is damaged.
It is interesting to notice that the ductility of [CPPS 0.75-60] concrete is retained
until 600°C.
4. CONCLUSION
8
TABLE II. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AS A FUNCTION OF THE TEMPERATURE
Measured Temperature
Concretes
parameter (°C)
20 SD 300 600 750 900
Compressive Cref(C) 65.2 0.7 58.4 36.0 18.1 6.4
strength fc,
CPPS
(MPa) 81.3 0.8 83.4 56.4 34.0 10.1
0.75-60
Flexural Cref(C) 7.4 0.1 5.9 3.7 2.3 1.0
tensile
strength ft, CPPS 10.9 0.1 9.0 5.7 4.2 1.2
(MPa) 0.75-60
REFERENCES:
[1] Harmathy T. Thermal properties of concrete at elevated temperatures. J Mater 1965:47–74.
[2] Ulm F-J, Coussy O, Bazant Z. The “Chunnel fire”. I: chemoplastic softening in rapidly
heated concrete. J Eng Mech 1999:272–82.
[3] Hammer T. High strength concrete, phase 3, SP 6 fire resistance report 6.2, Spalling
reduction through material design. SINTEF Rep STF70F92156 1992.
[4] Watanabe K, Bangi MR, Horiguchi T. The effect of testing conditions (hot and residual) on
fracture toughness of fiber reinforced high-strength concrete subjected to high temperatures.
Cem Concr Res 2013;51:6–13. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.04.003.
[5] CEN. TC 250, Eurocode 2 Des Concr Struct – Part 1-2 Gen Rules – Struct Fire Des 2004.
[6] Xing Z, Beaucour A-L, Hebert R, Noumowé A, Ledesert B. Influence of the nature of
aggregates on the behaviour of concrete subjected to elevated temperature. Cem Concr Res
2011;41:392–402. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.01.005.
9
[7] Kalifa P, Chene G, Galle C. High-temperature behaviour of HPC with polypropylene fibers -
from spalling to microstructure. Cem Concr Researc 1999;31:1487–99.
[8] Noumowé A. Mechanical properties and microstructure of high strength concrete containing
polypropylene fibres exposed to temperatures up to 200 °C. Cem Concr Res 2005;35:2192–
8. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.007.
[9] Pliya P, Beaucour A-L, Noumowé. A. Contribution of cocktail of polypropylene and steel
fibres in improving the behaviour of high strength concrete subjected to high temperature.
Constr Build Mater 2011;25:1926–34. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.064.
[10] Ezziane M, Molez L, Kadri T, Jauberthie R, Gouttefangeas F. Adhérence fibre d’acier –
matrice cimentaire dans les mortiers fibrés à hautes températures 2012:1–10.
10